fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r180-tall-171640604000721
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for HealthRecord-PT-04

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
447.424 81145.00 114408.00 296.10 FTTFTTTTFFTTFTTT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r180-tall-171640604000721.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-04, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r180-tall-171640604000721
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 408K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 22 14:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K Apr 12 20:08 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K Apr 12 20:08 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K Apr 12 20:07 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K Apr 12 20:07 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716519330241

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 64 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Transformed 123 places.
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Transformed 239 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 123 places and 239 transitions and 617 arcs in 168 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 8 transitions.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 65 out of 123 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 231/231 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 95 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 95 transition count 177
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 94 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 94 transition count 175
Applied a total of 58 rules in 22 ms. Remains 94 /123 variables (removed 29) and now considering 175/231 (removed 56) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 15 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 213 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:55:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 341 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 174 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 6/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 15/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 5/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 168/262 variables, 94/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 7724 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 6/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 40/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 168/262 variables, 94/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 174/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 263/263 variables, and 321 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 7421 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 15245ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15257ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/123 places, 175/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15646 ms. Remains : 94/123 places, 175/231 transitions.
Support contains 65 out of 94 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:47] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-24 02:55:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-24 02:55:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 175 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 94 places (down from 65) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3098 resets) in 1563 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 19/59 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 16/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (42 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (44 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (44 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (42 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (43 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (46 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 12/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 48/64 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 6/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/94 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 168/262 variables, 94/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved in 930 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 48/64 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 8/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 02:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/94 variables, 6/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 4/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 168/262 variables, 94/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 11/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/263 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 263/263 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved in 865 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/12 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints]
After SMT, in 1808ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 11 unsolved
Fused 11 Parikh solutions to 9 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 9 properties in 577 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 94 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 122 edges and 94 vertex of which 8 / 94 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 343 edges and 90 vertex of which 85 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 85 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 82 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 81 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 80 transition count 151
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 80 transition count 150
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 79 transition count 150
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 48 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 4 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 48 transition count 88
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 40 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 40 transition count 72
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 40 transition count 68
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 38 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 38 transition count 62
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 36 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 36 transition count 58
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 36 transition count 56
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -25
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 31 transition count 81
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 31 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 30 transition count 80
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 30 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 29 transition count 79
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 10 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 10 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 29 transition count 79
Applied a total of 134 rules in 58 ms. Remains 29 /94 variables (removed 65) and now considering 79/175 (removed 96) transitions.
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-24 02:55:50] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 69/98 variables, 29/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 14/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/98 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 98/98 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved in 556 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/28 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 69/98 variables, 29/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 14/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 52/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/98 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 98/98 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved in 870 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1487ms problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 11 dead transitions in 1489ms
Found 11 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 11 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) triggered by suspicious arc values removed 11 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 29/94 places, 68/175 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 88 edges and 29 vertex of which 28 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 27 transition count 67
Applied a total of 3 rules in 7 ms. Remains 27 /29 variables (removed 2) and now considering 67/68 (removed 1) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 1555 ms. Remains : 27/94 places, 67/175 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 12710 steps (2082 resets) in 399 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 175 transitions.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 12 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 60 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 60 transition count 112
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 54 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 54 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 54 transition count 98
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 52 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 52 transition count 92
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 50 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 50 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 50 transition count 86
Applied a total of 92 rules in 6 ms. Remains 50 /94 variables (removed 44) and now considering 86/175 (removed 89) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 50 cols
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 85 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/134 variables, 50/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 1340 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 84/134 variables, 50/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 85/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 2126 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 3490ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3492ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/94 places, 86/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3582 ms. Remains : 50/94 places, 86/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18063914067726247038.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1181904606503419113.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18063914067726247038.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1181904606503419113.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,53957,0.03129,4384,2,723,5,3768,6,0,284,3209,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AX(EG(((p8!=0)&&(p73!=1)))) + EG(AG((p87==0)))) + ((p112==0)&&(p55==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EX(!(EG(((p8!=0)&&(p73!=1)))))) + EG(!(E(TRUE U !((p87==0)))))) + ((p112==0)&&(p55==1))))] != FAL...157
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, ...308
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.592606,26172,1,0,327,136857,210,179,2096,128253,364
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 99 edges and 94 vertex of which 6 / 94 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 59 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 59 transition count 112
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 52 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 52 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 52 transition count 95
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 52 transition count 92
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 50 transition count 90
Applied a total of 88 rules in 15 ms. Remains 50 /94 variables (removed 44) and now considering 90/175 (removed 85) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 50 cols
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 89 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 85/135 variables, 50/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 136/136 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 1866 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/135 variables, 50/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 89/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 136/136 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 1899 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 3788ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3790ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/94 places, 90/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3914 ms. Remains : 50/94 places, 90/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6977406328365234737.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5725202131581903102.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6977406328365234737.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5725202131581903102.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,138137,0.036419,4992,2,660,5,6483,6,0,283,6995,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(((p86==0)||(p92==1)) U (p44==1)) U EG((AF((AF(((p52==0)||(p17==1))) * (p48!=0))) * (!(((p99==0)&&(p68==1))) + E(AF((p103==1)) U E((p3...189
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,E(((p86==0)||(p92==1)) U (p44==1))),(!(EG(!((!(EG(!(((p52==0)||(p17==1))))) * (p48!=0))))) * (!(...251
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t2...346
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.64766,65828,1,0,589,358917,234,329,2028,409044,655
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 62 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 62 transition count 115
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 56 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 56 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 56 transition count 100
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 54 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 54 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 53 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 53 transition count 92
Applied a total of 85 rules in 7 ms. Remains 53 /94 variables (removed 41) and now considering 92/175 (removed 83) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 89/142 variables, 53/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 143/143 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 1964 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 89/142 variables, 53/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 91/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 143/143 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2521 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 4506ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4508ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/94 places, 92/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4612 ms. Remains : 53/94 places, 92/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12682403564439117690.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2376362102691504158.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12682403564439117690.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2376362102691504158.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,104985,0.033534,4764,2,1051,5,5871,6,0,300,6011,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EG(((AX(((p50==0)||(p43==1))) + ((AF(((p80==0)||(p13==1))) * (p90==1)) * ((p26==0)&&(p21==0)))) + ((p106==0)||(p100==1)))) + (p87==0...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p68==1))) * !((p87==0))) * !(EG(((!(EX(!(((p50==0)||(p43==1))))) + ((!(EG(!(((p80==0)||...242
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...347
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.941534,39888,1,0,328,206663,219,175,2189,224445,326
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 104 edges and 94 vertex of which 6 / 94 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 57 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 57 transition count 110
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 49 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 49 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 49 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 48 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 48 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 47 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 47 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 47 transition count 84
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 47 transition count 82
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 46 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 45 transition count 80
Applied a total of 96 rules in 23 ms. Remains 45 /94 variables (removed 49) and now considering 80/175 (removed 95) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 45 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:07] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 02:56:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 66 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/45 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/120 variables, 45/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/121 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 953 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/45 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 75/120 variables, 45/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 66/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/121 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 1157 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 2125ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2126ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/94 places, 80/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2230 ms. Remains : 45/94 places, 80/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality488372992621057763.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2676816146119607281.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality488372992621057763.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2676816146119607281.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,47742,0.042215,5212,2,693,5,7092,6,0,254,8353,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((A(((p115==0)||(p5==1)) U (p72==0)) + ((p35==0)&&(p62==1))) + ((p97==1)&&(p120==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p97==1)&&(p120==0)))) * !(((p35==0)&&(p62==1)))),!((p72==0))) * (!(((p115==0)||(...292
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 78/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.090337,6796,1,0,13,18633,24,7,1359,10138,10
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 61 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 61 transition count 113
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 55 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 55 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 55 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 54 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 54 transition count 96
Applied a total of 82 rules in 3 ms. Remains 54 /94 variables (removed 40) and now considering 96/175 (removed 79) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 93/147 variables, 54/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 2841 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 8/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 93/147 variables, 54/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 95/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 2742 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 5609ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5610ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/94 places, 96/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5711 ms. Remains : 54/94 places, 96/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5044076842302495843.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3722696709836735363.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5044076842302495843.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3722696709836735363.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,77040,0.054654,5844,2,1744,5,9188,6,0,308,10500,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((p65==1) + EG((p100==1)))) * !(A(EX(!(((p8==1)&&(p103==0)))) U ((AG((((p37==0)||(p108==1))&&((p115==0)||(p80==1)))) * EX(TRUE)) * A(...195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((p65==1) + EG((p100==1))))),!(((!(E(TRUE U !((((p37==0)||(p108==1))&&((p115==0...1705
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...392
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.34753,81996,1,0,540,435417,239,281,2381,461831,594
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 63 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 63 transition count 116
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 58 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 58 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 58 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 56 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 56 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 55 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 55 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 55 transition count 95
Applied a total of 81 rules in 23 ms. Remains 55 /94 variables (removed 39) and now considering 95/175 (removed 80) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 91/146 variables, 55/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 147/147 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 2138 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 91/146 variables, 55/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 94/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 147/147 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 2756 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 4919ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4920ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/94 places, 95/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5039 ms. Remains : 55/94 places, 95/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13435872249243151923.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10225076617231024920.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13435872249243151923.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10225076617231024920.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,100450,0.023055,4244,2,602,5,3158,6,0,308,2510,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((AF(((!(((p24==0)||(p21==1))) + AX(((p67==0)||(p64==1)))) + EF((p22==1)))) * (p17==0)) * ((!(((E((p46==1) U ((p53==0)||(p95==1))) * EX...234
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(EX(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((p114==1))))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!(EX(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((p114==1)))))...433
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, ...338
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.497906,24384,1,0,364,133273,234,196,2303,105611,377
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 58 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 58 transition count 108
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 50 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 50 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 50 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 48 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 48 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 47 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 47 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 47 transition count 79
Applied a total of 99 rules in 4 ms. Remains 47 /94 variables (removed 47) and now considering 79/175 (removed 96) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 47 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/47 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 77/124 variables, 47/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/125 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 125/125 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 1223 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/47 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 77/124 variables, 47/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 78/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/125 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 125/125 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2088 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 3330ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3331ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/94 places, 79/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3417 ms. Remains : 47/94 places, 79/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17560179846170625770.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality784945906029407576.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17560179846170625770.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality784945906029407576.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,51768,0.059457,6004,2,1907,5,9988,6,0,265,12303,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(EX(((p13==1) * E(((p78==0)||(p101==1)) U (p12==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE)) * (p13==1)),((p78==0)||(p101==1))) * (p12==1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 72/0/7
(forward)formula 0,1,0.117062,7324,1,0,12,12312,17,2,597,17456,9
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 125 edges and 94 vertex of which 8 / 94 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 53 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 53 transition count 103
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 45 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 45 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 45 transition count 83
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 42 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 42 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 42 transition count 74
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 40 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 40 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 40 transition count 68
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 40 transition count 64
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 38 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 37 transition count 61
Applied a total of 114 rules in 21 ms. Remains 37 /94 variables (removed 57) and now considering 61/175 (removed 114) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 47 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/37 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/93 variables, 37/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/93 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 93/94 variables, and 46 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 528 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/37 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 56/93 variables, 37/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 47/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/93 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 93/94 variables, and 95 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 664 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 1209ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1210ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/94 places, 61/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1310 ms. Remains : 37/94 places, 61/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7967860911993399531.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18298439022825444241.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7967860911993399531.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18298439022825444241.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,22846,0.022645,4080,2,614,5,2743,6,0,203,2244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((p107!=0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(p107!=0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 58/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.056559,5664,1,0,8,12189,19,2,1072,6481,8
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 56 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 56 transition count 104
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 48 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 48 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 48 transition count 84
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 45 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 45 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 45 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 43 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 43 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 43 transition count 69
Applied a total of 108 rules in 6 ms. Remains 43 /94 variables (removed 51) and now considering 69/175 (removed 106) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 43 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 68 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 67/110 variables, 43/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/111 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 111/111 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 958 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 67/110 variables, 43/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 68/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/111 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 111/111 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 1427 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 2399ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2400ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/94 places, 69/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2492 ms. Remains : 43/94 places, 69/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6259060871635817962.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5852921219473102084.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6259060871635817962.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5852921219473102084.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,34272,0.016489,3852,2,646,5,2592,6,0,239,1995,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(EX(((p81==0)||(p121==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(EX(((p81==0)||(p121==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, Intersecti...242
(forward)formula 0,0,0.088009,7864,1,0,127,20229,152,59,1637,17552,147
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 57 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 57 transition count 106
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 48 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 48 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 48 transition count 84
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 45 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 45 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 45 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 44 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 44 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 44 transition count 72
Applied a total of 105 rules in 5 ms. Remains 44 /94 variables (removed 50) and now considering 72/175 (removed 103) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 70/114 variables, 44/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/115 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 115/115 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1305 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 70/114 variables, 44/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 71/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/115 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 115/115 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1545 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 2863ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2863ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/94 places, 72/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2932 ms. Remains : 44/94 places, 72/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17325579336430342991.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9258787512875284364.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17325579336430342991.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9258787512875284364.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,44235,0.034015,4976,2,947,5,6186,6,0,246,7130,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((p64==1)) + AX((p15==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(E(TRUE U (p64==1))))) * !((p15==1)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t21, t22, t34, t...282
(forward)formula 0,1,0.17115,10784,1,0,157,34818,165,69,1703,31409,166
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 65 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 65 transition count 121
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 60 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 60 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 60 transition count 110
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 58 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 58 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 57 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 57 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 57 transition count 101
Applied a total of 76 rules in 11 ms. Remains 57 /94 variables (removed 37) and now considering 101/175 (removed 74) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 57 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/155 variables, 57/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/156 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/156 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 156/156 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2227 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 98/155 variables, 57/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 100/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/156 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/156 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 156/156 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 3224 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 5489ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5490ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/94 places, 101/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5629 ms. Remains : 57/94 places, 101/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5714530488286253428.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16602517970379207000.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5714530488286253428.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16602517970379207000.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,154396,0.049791,5596,2,931,5,8472,6,0,324,10006,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((p34==0)||(p84==1)) U (AG(((EF(((p87==0)||(p69==1))) + (p68==0)) + (p26!=1))) + (p25!=0))) * (EG((EF((p55==0)) * (p65==0))) + (!(A(AG...249
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((FwdU(((FwdU(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(((E(TRUE U ((p87==0)||(p69==1))) + (p68==0)) + (p26!=1))))) + (p25!=0))))...722
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...408
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.4625,55700,1,0,536,309306,255,303,2378,321179,559
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 56 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 56 transition count 104
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 47 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 47 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 47 transition count 81
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 44 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 44 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 44 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 42 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 42 transition count 68
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 42 transition count 66
Applied a total of 111 rules in 6 ms. Remains 42 /94 variables (removed 52) and now considering 66/175 (removed 109) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:41] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:56:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 65 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/42 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/106 variables, 42/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/107 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 107/107 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 974 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/42 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 64/106 variables, 42/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 65/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/107 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 107/107 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 1271 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 2261ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2262ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/94 places, 66/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2342 ms. Remains : 42/94 places, 66/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17651005478116733893.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15855474139193388069.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17651005478116733893.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15855474139193388069.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,38646,0.036877,4936,2,1000,5,6056,6,0,232,6464,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((p26==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((p26==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t30, t45, t47, t48, t...257
(forward)formula 0,0,0.170133,11008,1,0,126,36960,152,57,1582,31746,143
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 58 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 58 transition count 108
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 52 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 52 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 52 transition count 93
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 50 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 50 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 50 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 49 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 49 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 49 transition count 84
Applied a total of 94 rules in 4 ms. Remains 49 /94 variables (removed 45) and now considering 84/175 (removed 91) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 49 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 82/131 variables, 49/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 1327 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 82/131 variables, 49/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 83/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 2169 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 3521ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3523ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/94 places, 84/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3604 ms. Remains : 49/94 places, 84/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10860735238300930984.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3340548579805194074.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10860735238300930984.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3340548579805194074.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,52497,0.028259,4188,2,778,5,3603,6,0,278,2947,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((AF((p60==1)) + A((p121==1) U ((p72==0)||(p81==1))))) + EF((p87==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((p60==1)))))] != FALSE + [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((p72==0)||(p81==1)))))) * !(E(!(((p72==0)||...265
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t...302
(forward)formula 0,1,0.53786,24760,1,0,283,124680,199,133,1939,114590,327
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 175/175 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 57 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 57 transition count 106
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 49 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 49 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 49 transition count 86
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 46 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 46 transition count 78
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 44 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 44 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 44 transition count 72
Applied a total of 105 rules in 5 ms. Remains 44 /94 variables (removed 50) and now considering 72/175 (removed 103) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 70/114 variables, 44/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/115 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 115/115 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1066 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 70/114 variables, 44/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 71/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/115 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 115/115 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1623 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 2704ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2706ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/94 places, 72/175 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2793 ms. Remains : 44/94 places, 72/175 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:56:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17603508561152579408.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10516717946958475934.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17603508561152579408.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10516717946958475934.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,41562,0.0508,5236,2,1503,5,7448,6,0,246,8302,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((p10==0)||(p87==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * ((p10==0)||(p87==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.052585,5500,1,0,8,7448,8,1,334,8302,2
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-24 02:56:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 02:56:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 79973 ms.

BK_STOP 1716519411386

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-04, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r180-tall-171640604000721"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-04.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;