Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r180-tall-171640604000713.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-03, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r180-tall-171640604000713
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 524K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Apr 22 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Apr 22 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 12 20:12 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 160K Apr 12 20:12 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Apr 12 20:11 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Apr 12 20:11 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716519217173

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-03
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 65 ms
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Transformed 121 places.
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Transformed 232 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 121 places and 232 transitions and 597 arcs in 160 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 22 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 7 transitions.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 82 out of 121 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 225/225 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 106 transition count 195
Applied a total of 30 rules in 20 ms. Remains 106 /121 variables (removed 15) and now considering 195/225 (removed 30) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 187 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 13 ms
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 203 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 187 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 333 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 194 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 187 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:53:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 110 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 11/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 186/292 variables, 106/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 5/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/293 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/293 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 293/293 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 13818 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 62/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 186/292 variables, 106/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 194/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/293 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/293 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 293/293 variables, and 380 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 14361 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints]
After SMT, in 28284ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28301ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/121 places, 195/225 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 28673 ms. Remains : 106/121 places, 195/225 transitions.
Support contains 82 out of 106 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:07] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-24 02:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 106 places (down from 82) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2710 resets) in 2257 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 26/77 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 60 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (39 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (39 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (39 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 26/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 23/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (38 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
[2024-05-24 02:54:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 187 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/76 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 30/106 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 186/292 variables, 106/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/293 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/293 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 293/293 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved in 864 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 45/76 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/106 variables, 6/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 16/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 186/292 variables, 106/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 20/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 1/293 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/293 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 293/293 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved in 2887 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/23 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints]
After SMT, in 3767ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 20 unsolved
Fused 20 Parikh solutions to 17 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 16 properties in 1543 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 106 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 137 edges and 106 vertex of which 8 / 106 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 384 edges and 102 vertex of which 96 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 6 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 6 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 96 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 92 transition count 170
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 92 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 89 transition count 168
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 53 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 53 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 53 transition count 96
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 47 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 47 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 47 transition count 81
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 45 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 45 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 43 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 43 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 43 transition count 69
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 42 transition count 68
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -30
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 37 transition count 98
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 15 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 15 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 37 transition count 98
Applied a total of 144 rules in 44 ms. Remains 37 /106 variables (removed 69) and now considering 98/195 (removed 97) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 37/106 places, 98/195 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 28515 steps (5178 resets) in 500 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
Computed a total of 10 stabilizing places and 18 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 63 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 63 transition count 115
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 57 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 57 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 57 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 56 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 56 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 55 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 55 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 55 transition count 95
Applied a total of 105 rules in 6 ms. Remains 55 /106 variables (removed 51) and now considering 95/195 (removed 100) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 4/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 92/147 variables, 55/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 2219 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 10/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 92/147 variables, 55/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 94/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 2568 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 4811ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4812ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/106 places, 95/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4905 ms. Remains : 55/106 places, 95/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3891443739657552649.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5561895289300571081.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3891443739657552649.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5561895289300571081.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94455,0.053233,5224,2,917,5,7165,6,0,311,7924,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AF(EX((p98==0))) * A(((E(((p78==0)||(p100==1)) U (p82==1)) * (((p120==0)||(p6==1))||(p48==1))) * ((p109==0)||(p14==1))) U ((AX(((p32...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EG(!(EX((p98==0))))) * !((E(!(((!(EX(!(((p32==0)||(p55==1))))) + (p5==0)) + (p97==1))) U (!(((E((...432
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...387
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.629751,24688,1,0,358,124618,234,190,2278,108404,383
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 65 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 65 transition count 119
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 60 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 60 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 60 transition count 107
Applied a total of 94 rules in 10 ms. Remains 60 /106 variables (removed 46) and now considering 107/195 (removed 88) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 105 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 105 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 105 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 104/164 variables, 60/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 1/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 77 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 2554 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 8/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 104/164 variables, 60/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 106/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 2475 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 5056ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/106 places, 107/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5183 ms. Remains : 60/106 places, 107/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9318033699064443270.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16544936702821462011.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9318033699064443270.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16544936702821462011.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,151317,0.035765,5108,2,735,5,6494,6,0,342,6397,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(((EG((A(((p99==0)||(p96==1)) U ((p3==0)||(p56==1))) * EF((p63==1)))) + EX((p87==1))) + (AG((p115==1)) + EF((p26==1)))) U !((((EX((p4...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((EG((!((E(!(((p3==0)||(p56==1))) U (!(((p99==0)||(p96==1))) * !(((p3==0)||(p56==1))))) ...362
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...418
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.881,37032,1,0,519,217170,265,260,2517,158038,572
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 68 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 68 transition count 123
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 64 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 64 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 64 transition count 113
Applied a total of 86 rules in 8 ms. Remains 64 /106 variables (removed 42) and now considering 113/195 (removed 82) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-24 02:54:25] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:54:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:54:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 112 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 6/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 108/172 variables, 64/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/173 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 173/173 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 2538 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 6/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 108/172 variables, 64/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 112/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/173 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 173/173 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 3297 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 5867ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5869ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/106 places, 113/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5974 ms. Remains : 64/106 places, 113/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11951158967300252862.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3263561429969887774.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11951158967300252862.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3263561429969887774.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,132688,0.121483,9088,2,2127,5,21383,6,0,358,28663,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(((EF((p17==1)) * (p73==0)) * (p80==1))) + ((A(((p9==0)||(p39==1)) U (A((p7==1) U ((p58==0)||(p25==1))) * AG(((p99==0)||(p20==1))))...249
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(((E(TRUE U (p17==1)) * (p73==0)) * (p80==1))))) + ((!((E(!((!((E(!(((p58==0)||(p25==1))) U ...708
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, ...436
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,4.97641,169960,1,0,673,994732,277,395,2652,980070,680
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 142 edges and 106 vertex of which 8 / 106 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 57 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 57 transition count 109
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 47 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 47 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 47 transition count 84
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 44 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 44 transition count 75
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 41 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 41 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 41 transition count 66
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 41 transition count 63
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 39 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 38 transition count 60
Applied a total of 137 rules in 17 ms. Remains 38 /106 variables (removed 68) and now considering 60/195 (removed 135) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 38 cols
[2024-05-24 02:54:36] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:54:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 02:54:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 46 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/38 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/93 variables, 38/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/93 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 93/94 variables, and 47 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved in 529 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/38 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 55/93 variables, 38/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 46/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/93 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 93/94 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved in 737 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 1275ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1276ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/106 places, 60/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1358 ms. Remains : 38/106 places, 60/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13166094558141228905.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17705503736030985580.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13166094558141228905.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17705503736030985580.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,41260,0.030915,4844,2,802,5,5707,6,0,205,6787,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AF((p21==0)) + (p45==1)) U (p14==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!((p21==0)))) + (p45==1))) * (p14==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t18, t19, t29, t30, t31, t32, t41...265
(forward)formula 0,1,0.48031,25560,1,0,217,104032,144,125,1359,155992,262
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 65 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 65 transition count 118
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 57 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 57 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 57 transition count 99
Applied a total of 101 rules in 4 ms. Remains 57 /106 variables (removed 49) and now considering 99/195 (removed 96) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 57 cols
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 98 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 95/152 variables, 57/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 2275 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 95/152 variables, 57/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 98/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 3091 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 5389ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5390ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/106 places, 99/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5465 ms. Remains : 57/106 places, 99/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13270063392766096124.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2537249157955934810.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13270063392766096124.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2537249157955934810.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,115785,0.028425,4528,2,589,5,3719,6,0,320,3323,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AG((((p60==0)||(p97==1))||(p89==1)))) * (AX((((((p75==1)||(p26==0))||((p51==1)||(p108==0)))||(p81==1))&&(((p107!=0)||(p12==0))||(p93=...222
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((((p60==0)||(p97==1))||(p89==1))))] = FALSE * [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(((p44==0) * !(EX(...398
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...367
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.221546,14032,1,0,262,61916,226,135,2375,49044,278
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 58 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 58 transition count 106
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 50 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 50 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 50 transition count 86
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 47 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 47 transition count 77
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 44 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 44 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 44 transition count 68
Applied a total of 131 rules in 5 ms. Remains 44 /106 variables (removed 62) and now considering 68/195 (removed 127) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 67 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 67 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 67 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 67 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 66/110 variables, 44/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/111 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 111/111 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 1221 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 66/110 variables, 44/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 67/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/111 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 111/111 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 1448 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 2683ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2684ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/106 places, 68/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2757 ms. Remains : 44/106 places, 68/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5787332106641534299.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1745572420316699720.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5787332106641534299.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1745572420316699720.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,39376,0.026349,4404,2,774,5,3822,6,0,242,3393,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX((EX(TRUE) + EF(((p73!=0) + AG((p68==1)))))) U (p110==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX((EX(TRUE) + E(TRUE U ((p73!=0) + !(E(TRUE U !((p68==1))))))))) * (p110==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t22, t23, t24, t49, ...263
(forward)formula 0,1,0.343406,18492,1,0,216,69986,162,123,1636,83687,260
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 60 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 60 transition count 109
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 51 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 51 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 51 transition count 87
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 48 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 48 transition count 78
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 45 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 45 transition count 72
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 45 transition count 70
Applied a total of 128 rules in 5 ms. Remains 45 /106 variables (removed 61) and now considering 70/195 (removed 125) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 45 cols
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 69 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 67/112 variables, 45/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/113 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/113 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 113/113 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved in 1405 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 67/112 variables, 45/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 69/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/113 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/113 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 113/113 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved in 1631 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 3047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3047ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/106 places, 70/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3119 ms. Remains : 45/106 places, 70/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 70 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1494194804593464713.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1605526132377545755.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1494194804593464713.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1605526132377545755.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,48609,0.035358,5216,2,1000,5,6727,6,0,245,7524,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((p113==0)||(p11==1)) + ((EX((p14==1)) * EX((p1==0))) + ((p22==0)&&(p67==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p113==0)||(p11==1)))) * !(((p22==0)&&(p67==1)))) * !(EX((p14==1))))] = FALSE * [(((Fw...251
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t21, t22, t33, t...302
(forward)formula 0,0,0.171602,11816,1,0,156,38668,158,68,1635,38903,151
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 61 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 61 transition count 112
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 56 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 56 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 56 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 55 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 55 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 54 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 54 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 54 transition count 94
Applied a total of 107 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /106 variables (removed 52) and now considering 94/195 (removed 101) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:54:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/146 variables, 54/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 147/147 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 1511 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 92/146 variables, 54/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 93/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 147/147 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 2696 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 4226ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4227ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/106 places, 94/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4298 ms. Remains : 54/106 places, 94/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18134035478248069068.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2973619345906987633.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18134035478248069068.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2973619345906987633.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,75583,0.026764,4504,2,627,5,4337,6,0,308,4047,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AX((((p9==0)||(p117==1)) + (((p118==0)||(p80==1)) * (AG((p105==1)) + EF(((p23==0)||(p48==1))))))) U AG((A(!(((p72==0)||(p89==1))) U AX(...202
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EX(!((((p9==0)||(p117==1)) + (((p118==0)||(p80==1)) * (!(E(TRUE U !((p105==1)))) + E(TRUE U ((p23=...391
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...357
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.528382,25852,1,0,345,112975,227,198,2250,123885,400
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 59 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 59 transition count 107
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 52 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 52 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 52 transition count 91
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 49 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 49 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 47 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 47 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 47 transition count 76
Applied a total of 122 rules in 6 ms. Remains 47 /106 variables (removed 59) and now considering 76/195 (removed 119) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 47 cols
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 75 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/47 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 73/120 variables, 47/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved in 1581 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/47 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 73/120 variables, 47/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 75/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved in 1383 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 2987ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2988ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/106 places, 76/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3067 ms. Remains : 47/106 places, 76/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1792837590961377505.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2244567639320928943.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1792837590961377505.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2244567639320928943.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,49581,0.019894,3884,2,593,5,2483,6,0,259,2126,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF(!(E((((p114==0)||(p29==0))||(p120==1)) U !(((p115==0)||(p37==1)))))) * AF((p19==1))) * ((p102==1) + AX(E(((p82==0)||(p41==1)) U (...167
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U !(E((((p114==0)||(p29==0))||(p120==1)) U !(((p115==0)||(p37==1)))))) * !(EG(!((p19==1)))))...228
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t24, t...262
(forward)formula 0,1,0.437344,21900,1,0,341,106450,193,184,1853,103681,402
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 68 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 68 transition count 124
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 63 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 63 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 63 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 62 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 62 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 61 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 61 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 61 transition count 107
Applied a total of 92 rules in 2 ms. Remains 61 /106 variables (removed 45) and now considering 107/195 (removed 88) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 104 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 61 cols
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 104 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 104 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 103/164 variables, 61/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 81 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 3101 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 10/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 103/164 variables, 61/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 106/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 2553 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 5677ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5678ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/106 places, 107/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5782 ms. Remains : 61/106 places, 107/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13833766119390494003.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13223308089626449423.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13833766119390494003.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13223308089626449423.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,267490,0.05269,5624,2,754,5,9524,6,0,344,9833,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((A(!(EX((p80==1))) U EX(EG((p43==1)))) * EF((EG(((p46==0) * AF(((p45==0)||(p40==1))))) * AX(EX((p54==1)))))) * AX(!(E(((E(((p0==0)||(p60...289
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,!(EX(EG((p43==1))))) * !(!(EX((p80==1))))) * !(EX(EG((p43==1)))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(EX(EG(...466
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...418
(forward)formula 0,0,0.25996,14336,1,0,225,52358,235,93,2423,49359,233
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 65 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 65 transition count 120
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 57 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 57 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 57 transition count 101
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 54 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 54 transition count 92
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 51 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 51 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 51 transition count 83
Applied a total of 116 rules in 3 ms. Remains 51 /106 variables (removed 55) and now considering 83/195 (removed 112) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/132 variables, 51/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 133/133 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 1329 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 81/132 variables, 51/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 82/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 2/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 133/133 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 2434 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 3787ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3788ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/106 places, 83/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3883 ms. Remains : 51/106 places, 83/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10904376885371028322.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3281319331866829062.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10904376885371028322.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3281319331866829062.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,125039,0.061711,6264,2,1045,5,11421,6,0,285,13530,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(E((p33==1) U (((p43==1)&&(p118!=1))&&(p46==1)))) + (E((AX(!(EF((p110==1)))) + (EF((((p85==0)||(p77==1))&&(p69==0))) * !(((p18==0)||(p...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !((E((!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U (p110==1)))))) + (E(TRUE U (((p85==0)||(p77==1))&&(p69==0))) * !(((p18==0)|...259
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t21, t22, t24, ...363
(forward)formula 0,0,0.560075,26516,1,0,332,135787,197,174,1945,121435,346
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 64 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 64 transition count 117
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 56 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 56 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 56 transition count 99
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 54 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 54 transition count 93
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 52 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 52 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 52 transition count 88
Applied a total of 111 rules in 7 ms. Remains 52 /106 variables (removed 54) and now considering 88/195 (removed 107) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 52 cols
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:55:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 87 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/137 variables, 52/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 1719 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 85/137 variables, 52/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 87/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 2667 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 4403ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4404ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/106 places, 88/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4496 ms. Remains : 52/106 places, 88/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14079258650117295751.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14010000770598550136.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14079258650117295751.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14010000770598550136.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,112869,0.066577,6568,2,1550,5,11701,6,0,292,15191,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((p64==1) U E(((AG(((p11==0)||(p29==1))) * EX((p93==1))) + !(AX((p51==1)))) U E(((p73==0)||(p46==1)) U (p14==1)))) + AX(AG(!(A(EG((p3==...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY((Init * !(E((p64==1) U E(((!(E(TRUE U !(((p11==0)||(p29==1))))) * EX((p93==1))) + !(!(EX(!((p51==1)))...363
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...367
(forward)formula 0,1,0.606121,26864,1,0,295,117949,219,139,2039,124656,324
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 59 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 59 transition count 108
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 52 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 52 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 52 transition count 92
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 49 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 49 transition count 83
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 46 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 46 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 46 transition count 74
Applied a total of 125 rules in 5 ms. Remains 46 /106 variables (removed 60) and now considering 74/195 (removed 121) transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 73 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/118 variables, 46/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 119/119 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 1191 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
[2024-05-24 02:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 02:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/118 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 73/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 119/119 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 1581 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 2783ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2784ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/106 places, 74/195 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2873 ms. Remains : 46/106 places, 74/195 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2024-05-24 02:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14234939966659549115.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9267240815534753899.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14234939966659549115.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9267240815534753899.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,70965,0.033569,4448,2,612,5,4388,6,0,256,5065,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AF(AX(E(((p82==0)||(p76==1)) U (p54==1)))) * ((p31==0)||(p26==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),!(!(EX(!(E(((p82==0)||(p76==1)) U (p54==1)))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(((p31==0)||(p26==1)))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t31, t...287
(forward)formula 0,0,0.312757,17120,1,0,265,57496,174,152,1736,87012,285
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-24 02:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 02:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 99944 ms.

BK_STOP 1716519318325

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-03"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-03, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r180-tall-171640604000713"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-03.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-03 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;