fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r180-tall-171640603500490
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
1149.075 468896.00 513025.00 1363.10 TFTTTTFTTTFTTTFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r180-tall-171640603500490.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r180-tall-171640603500490
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 472K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 22 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 22 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 22 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 22 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 22:27 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 117K Apr 11 22:27 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K Apr 11 22:27 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K Apr 11 22:27 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716507912151

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 60 ms
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Transformed 188 places.
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Transformed 197 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 188 places and 197 transitions and 477 arcs in 151 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Support contains 113 out of 188 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 197/197 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 182 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 182 transition count 191
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 179 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 179 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 179 transition count 186
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 178 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 178 transition count 185
Applied a total of 22 rules in 36 ms. Remains 178 /188 variables (removed 10) and now considering 185/197 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 178 cols
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 212 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 349 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 184 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:45:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 185/362 variables, 177/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/363 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/363 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 363/363 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 6215 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 185/362 variables, 177/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 184/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/363 variables, 1/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 0/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/363 variables, 0/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 363/363 variables, and 372 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 6083 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12362ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12380ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 178/188 places, 185/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12787 ms. Remains : 178/188 places, 185/197 transitions.
Support contains 113 out of 178 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-23 23:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2024-05-23 23:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-23 23:45:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 185 transitions.
Support contains 111 out of 178 places (down from 113) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (507 resets) in 1395 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 7/94 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (65 resets) in 306 ms. (130 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (82 resets) in 132 ms. (300 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (86 resets) in 232 ms. (171 steps per ms) remains 5/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (59 resets) in 84 ms. (470 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (82 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (77 resets) in 82 ms. (481 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
[2024-05-23 23:45:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 152/177 variables, 9/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 185/362 variables, 177/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp79 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 363/363 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved in 124 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 131ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-23 23:45:27] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-23 23:45:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-23 23:45:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-23 23:45:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 185 transitions.
Support contains 94 out of 178 places (down from 95) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 35 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 268 edges and 178 vertex of which 165 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 13 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 177 transition count 185
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 163 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 163 transition count 171
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 158 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 158 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 158 transition count 162
Applied a total of 43 rules in 25 ms. Remains 158 /178 variables (removed 20) and now considering 162/185 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 158 cols
[2024-05-23 23:45:27] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:45:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:45:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:45:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:45:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 162/319 variables, 157/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/320 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 320/320 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 4614 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 162/319 variables, 157/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 161/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 1/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/320 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 320/320 variables, and 328 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 4876 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9516ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9519ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 158/178 places, 162/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9697 ms. Remains : 158/178 places, 162/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-23 23:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-23 23:45:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 162 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-23 23:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-23 23:45:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5277502878017152842.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:45:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10719068131787292247.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5277502878017152842.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10719068131787292247.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.88212e+11,4.86381,148520,2,26737,5,626655,6,0,796,639946,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(((AG(AF((p181==1))) + (p93==1)) + AF(AG((p64==1)))) U (p151==1))) + (EX(AX(EX(((p173==1)||(p116==1))))) * AF((p119==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(!(!((E(!((p151==1)) U (!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p181==1))))))) + (p93==1)) + !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p...463
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t6, t7, t8, t13, t23, t24, t30, t38, t44, t53, t60, t67, t74, t81, t88, t98, t105, t112, ...285
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-23 23:46:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-23 23:46:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14270295802615633806.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14270295802615633806.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14270295802615633806.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14270295802615633806.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14270295802615633806.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-23 23:46:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-23 23:46:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-23 23:46:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 55 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:46:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-23 23:46:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8728864742941900585.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16691784245591118708.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8728864742941900585.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16691784245591118708.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.88212e+11,0.058131,6192,406,35,4802,296,393,7086,53,614,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(((AG(AF((i9.u62.p181==1))) + (i5.i1.u35.p93==1)) + AF(AG((i4.i0.u23.p64==1)))) U (i8.i1.u56.p151==1))) + (EX(AX(EX(((i9.u61.p173==1)...208
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(!(!((E(!((i8.i1.u56.p151==1)) U (!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((i9.u62.p181==1))))))) + (i5.i1.u35.p93==1...604
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t23, t144, i0.t139, i0.i1.u4.t132, i2.t126, i2.i2.t119, i3.t112, i3.i1.u22.t105, i4.t98, ...402
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,2.29564,87504,1,0,189103,662,2460,222940,267,1935,175245
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 153 edges and 178 vertex of which 7 / 178 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 261 edges and 172 vertex of which 159 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 13 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 13 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 85 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 85 transitions
Performed 85 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 85
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 158 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 93 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 73 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 72 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 69 transition count 78
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 69 transition count 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 52 transition count 61
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 44 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 44 transition count 53
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 28 transition count 37
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 27 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 26 transition count 35
Applied a total of 272 rules in 28 ms. Remains 26 /178 variables (removed 152) and now considering 35/185 (removed 150) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-23 23:46:09] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:46:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:46:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-23 23:46:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-23 23:46:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:46:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:46:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 34/52 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/60 variables, 8/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 61/61 variables, and 27 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 225 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 26/26 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 34/52 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 12/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 8/60 variables, 8/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 14/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 61/61 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 248 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 26/26 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 481ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 481ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/178 places, 35/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 580 ms. Remains : 26/178 places, 35/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 35 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12196928795642709444.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6073370558136720482.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12196928795642709444.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6073370558136720482.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,427920,0.023911,4412,2,205,5,5879,6,0,138,5618,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(((p23==1) * !(EG((p44==1))))) U !(EF((p37==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U (p37==1))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U (p37==1)))) U (!(!(((p23==1) * !(EG((p44==1)))))) ...195
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t22, t23, t24, t25, Intersection with reachable at ...221
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.271758,16184,1,0,250,77272,104,138,906,93367,279
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 177 transition count 185
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 160 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 160 transition count 168
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 152 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 152 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 152 transition count 154
Applied a total of 57 rules in 10 ms. Remains 152 /178 variables (removed 26) and now considering 154/185 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 152 cols
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 153 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:46:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 154/305 variables, 151/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/306 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 306/306 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved in 4253 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 152/152 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 154/305 variables, 151/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 153/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/306 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 306/306 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved in 4724 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 152/152 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9002ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9003ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/178 places, 154/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9141 ms. Remains : 152/178 places, 154/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 154 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12423304719428859685.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13652743230642443927.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12423304719428859685.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13652743230642443927.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.43432e+11,4.92702,152288,2,26728,5,641455,6,0,764,662607,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(AF((p40!=1)) U ((E(EF((p80==1)) U EX((p58==1))) * !(AF((p147==1)))) * (p22==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,!(((E(E(TRUE U (p80==1)) U EX((p58==1))) * !(!(EG(!((p147==1)))))) * (p22==1)))) * !(!(EG(!((p40...624
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t4, t5, t6, t10, t21, t22, t27, t34, t41, t48, t55, t62, t69, t76, t83, t90, t97, t104, t...284
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-23 23:46:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-23 23:46:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3656411354102473727.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3656411354102473727.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3656411354102473727.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3656411354102473727.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3656411354102473727.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-23 23:46:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-23 23:46:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-23 23:46:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 53 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:46:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-23 23:46:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7276026331331148130.gal : 9 ms
[2024-05-23 23:46:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9584076969502600385.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7276026331331148130.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9584076969502600385.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.43432e+11,0.089337,5876,389,37,4160,268,354,6960,50,543,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(AF((i1.i1.u14.p40!=1)) U ((E(EF((i3.i1.u26.p80==1)) U EX((i2.i1.u18.p58==1))) * !(AF((i7.i1.u51.p147==1)))) * (i0.i1.u7.p22==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,!(((E(E(TRUE U (i3.i1.u26.p80==1)) U EX((i2.i1.u18.p58==1))) * !(!(EG(!((i7.i1.u51.p147==1))))))...849
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t136, i0.t131, i0.i1.u9.t124, i1.t118, i1.i1.u10.t111, i2.t104, i2.i1.u20.t97, i3.t90, i...413
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,1,11.9787,307628,1,0,582066,462,2254,718015,252,1457,396445
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 156 edges and 178 vertex of which 7 / 178 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 261 edges and 172 vertex of which 159 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 13 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 13 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 89 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 89 transitions
Performed 89 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 89
Iterating post reduction 0 with 89 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 158 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 89 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 97 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 69 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 68 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 67 transition count 76
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 67 transition count 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 50 transition count 59
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 42 transition count 51
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 42 transition count 51
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 25 transition count 34
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 24 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 23 transition count 32
Applied a total of 278 rules in 13 ms. Remains 23 /178 variables (removed 155) and now considering 32/185 (removed 153) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 31/46 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/54 variables, 8/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 183 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 31/46 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 8/54 variables, 8/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 16/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 47 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 201 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 404ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 404ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/178 places, 32/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 549 ms. Remains : 23/178 places, 32/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 11 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (2 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14188169131118435749.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18168522659898767540.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14188169131118435749.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18168522659898767540.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 177 transition count 185
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 166 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 166 transition count 174
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 164 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 164 transition count 172
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 164 transition count 170
Applied a total of 29 rules in 9 ms. Remains 164 /178 variables (removed 14) and now considering 170/185 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 164 cols
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 213 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 169 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:47:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 170/333 variables, 163/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/334 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 4859 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 170/333 variables, 163/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 169/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/334 variables, 1/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 342 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 5260 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10145ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10147ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/178 places, 170/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10370 ms. Remains : 164/178 places, 170/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 170 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10000741416803613223.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13669772746769494349.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10000741416803613223.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13669772746769494349.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.17744e+11,5.22552,163452,2,29165,5,710848,6,0,828,693749,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!((((AF((p2==1)) * EX((p48==1))) + EF((p55==1))) * !((EF((p178==1)) + E((p162==1) U (p142==1)))))) + E(((((p180!=1)&&(p23==1))&&(p115...336
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((!((((!(EG(!((p2==1)))) * EX((p48==1))) + E(TRUE U (p55==1))) * !((E(TRUE U (p178==1)) + E((p162==1...471
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t8, t12, t24, t25, t31, t42, t48, t55, t63, t71, t77, t87, t94, t103, t111, t119, t12...282
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-23 23:47:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-23 23:47:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17137286244134949143.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17137286244134949143.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17137286244134949143.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17137286244134949143.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17137286244134949143.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-23 23:47:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-23 23:47:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-23 23:47:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:47:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-23 23:47:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5912242447317546283.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17566706568184433537.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5912242447317546283.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17566706568184433537.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.17744e+11,0.063501,6308,382,24,5531,231,401,7578,41,483,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!((((AF((i0.i0.u0.p2==1)) * EX((i3.i1.u19.p48==1))) + EF((i3.i0.u18.p55==1))) * !((EF((i10.u64.p178==1)) + E((i9.u60.p162==1) U (i8.i...531
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((!((((!(EG(!((i0.i0.u0.p2==1)))) * EX((i3.i1.u19.p48==1))) + E(TRUE U (i3.i0.u18.p55==1))) * !((E(T...686
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t152, i1.i0.t138, i1.i0.u5.t147, i2.t132, i2.i1.u16.t125, i3.i1.t111, i3.i1.u19.t119, i4.i2.t...419
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,3.41925,127220,1,0,290489,231,2694,269642,190,502,252767
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 177 transition count 185
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 160 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 160 transition count 168
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 153 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 153 transition count 161
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 153 transition count 156
Applied a total of 54 rules in 14 ms. Remains 153 /178 variables (removed 25) and now considering 156/185 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 153 cols
[2024-05-23 23:47:46] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:47:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:47:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 182 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 155 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:47:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 156/308 variables, 152/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/309 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/309 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 309/309 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved in 4217 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 155/155 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 156/308 variables, 152/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 155/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/309 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/309 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 309/309 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved in 4558 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 155/155 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8793ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8795ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/178 places, 156/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8991 ms. Remains : 153/178 places, 156/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:47:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:47:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4527385307025024792.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:47:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1762050073390514198.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4527385307025024792.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1762050073390514198.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52757e+11,5.03104,157156,2,27652,5,660869,6,0,770,680369,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(AF((AX((p16==1)) + EF((p11==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(EY(Init)),!((!(EX(!((p16==1)))) + E(TRUE U (p11==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t4, t5, t6, t10, t21, t22, t27, t34, t41, t48, t55, t62, t69, t76, t83, t90, t97, t104, t...284
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-23 23:48:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-23 23:48:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-23 23:48:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14458432124511609845.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14458432124511609845.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14458432124511609845.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14458432124511609845.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14458432124511609845.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-23 23:48:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-23 23:48:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-23 23:48:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 65 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:48:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-23 23:48:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-23 23:48:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11430600631069924646.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:48:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1582612030997096362.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11430600631069924646.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1582612030997096362.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52757e+11,0.050729,5920,325,29,4238,266,356,5982,45,474,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(AF((AX((i1.i2.u5.p16==1)) + EF((i1.i0.u4.p11==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(EY(Init)),!((!(EX(!((i1.i2.u5.p16==1)))) + E(TRUE U (i1.i0.u4.p11==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t138, i1.i2.t124, i1.i2.t133, i2.t118, i2.i1.u16.t111, i3.t104, i3.i1.u22.t97, i4.t90, i...403
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,1.27061,47368,1,0,107275,302,2163,110700,213,819,97573
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 177 transition count 185
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 163 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 163 transition count 171
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 158 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 158 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 158 transition count 162
Applied a total of 43 rules in 10 ms. Remains 158 /178 variables (removed 20) and now considering 162/185 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 158 cols
[2024-05-23 23:48:27] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:48:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:48:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:48:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:48:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 162/319 variables, 157/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/320 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 320/320 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 4530 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 162/319 variables, 157/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 161/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 1/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/320 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 320/320 variables, and 328 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 4644 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9190ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9192ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 158/178 places, 162/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9350 ms. Remains : 158/178 places, 162/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:48:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-23 23:48:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:48:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 162 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:48:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:48:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:48:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12409198470601403777.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:48:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16785494002844953996.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12409198470601403777.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16785494002844953996.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.13653e+11,9.55147,273896,2,47525,5,1.05714e+06,6,0,796,1.09342e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-23 23:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-23 23:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17824251364556750076.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17824251364556750076.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17824251364556750076.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17824251364556750076.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17824251364556750076.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-23 23:49:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-23 23:49:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-23 23:49:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-23 23:49:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13443395059050106415.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4632204339395093694.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13443395059050106415.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4632204339395093694.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.13653e+11,0.058606,6232,392,35,4941,415,415,7690,51,943,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((((((AF(((i1.i1.u15.p40==1)||(i2.i1.u24.p61==1))) * AF((i0.i0.u8.p19==0))) * ((((i3.i2.u29.p75==0)&&(i0.i0.u5.p10==0))||((i10.u62.p17...636
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((((i4.i1.u34.p86==0)||(i10.u58.p169==0))||(i10.u63.p184==0))&&(i3.i1.u27.p70==0))...1480
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t22, t144, i0.t139, i0.i1.u4.t129, i1.t123, i1.i2.t116, i2.i1.t102, i2.i1.u20.t110, i3.i1.t85...428
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,3.67185,126880,1,0,260763,434,2906,359183,285,1285,225700
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 124 edges and 178 vertex of which 7 / 178 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 261 edges and 172 vertex of which 160 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 12 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 12 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 159 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 94 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 88 transition count 103
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 88 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 75 transition count 90
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 64 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 64 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 64 transition count 77
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 64 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 63 transition count 76
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 48 transition count 61
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 48 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 47 transition count 60
Applied a total of 229 rules in 16 ms. Remains 47 /178 variables (removed 131) and now considering 60/185 (removed 125) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 47 cols
[2024-05-23 23:49:10] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:49:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:49:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-23 23:49:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 54 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-23 23:49:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 56 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:49:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:49:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 59/102 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/106 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/107 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 107/107 variables, and 48 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 669 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 59/102 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 39/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/106 variables, 4/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 17/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/107 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 107/107 variables, and 104 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 758 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1435ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1435ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/178 places, 60/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1510 ms. Remains : 47/178 places, 60/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability747398236606728741.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7799949406699279855.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability747398236606728741.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7799949406699279855.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.29909e+07,0.122007,8532,2,551,5,24407,6,0,247,27830,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((p124==0)) * EG((AF(((((p167==0)||(p46==0))&&(((p38==0)||(p169==0))||(p184==0)))&&(p48==0))) * ((((p176==0) * !(E((p143==1) U (p89==1...229
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((p124==0)))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EG((!(EG(!(((((p167==0)||(p46==0))&&(((p38==0)||(p169==0))||(p18...314
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t7, t11, t17, t21, t28, t38, t40, t41, t42, t45, t48, t59, Intersection with reachab...227
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,6.30776,223668,1,0,659,1.4266e+06,171,372,1650,1.59234e+06,687
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 177 transition count 185
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 161 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 161 transition count 169
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 153 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 153 transition count 161
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 153 transition count 155
Applied a total of 55 rules in 14 ms. Remains 153 /178 variables (removed 25) and now considering 155/185 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 153 cols
[2024-05-23 23:49:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:49:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:49:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 154 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:49:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 155/307 variables, 152/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/308 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 308/308 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 4196 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 155/307 variables, 152/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 154/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/308 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 308/308 variables, and 316 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 4415 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8627ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8628ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/178 places, 155/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8772 ms. Remains : 153/178 places, 155/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:49:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:49:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6012516776842573102.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15193298890305090222.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6012516776842573102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15193298890305090222.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52799e+11,4.99421,158956,2,28520,5,680551,6,0,769,684564,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((p42==1)) + EX((p133==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p42==1))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * (p133==1))] != FALSE)
(forward)formula 0,1,5.01624,158956,1,0,7,680551,8,1,772,684564,1
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 177 transition count 185
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 164 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 164 transition count 172
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 158 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 158 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 158 transition count 162
Applied a total of 43 rules in 13 ms. Remains 158 /178 variables (removed 20) and now considering 162/185 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 158 cols
[2024-05-23 23:49:31] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:49:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:49:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:49:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 162/319 variables, 157/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/320 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 320/320 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 4550 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 162/319 variables, 157/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 161/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/320 variables, 1/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/320 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 320/320 variables, and 328 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 5271 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9843ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9844ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 158/178 places, 162/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9975 ms. Remains : 158/178 places, 162/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:49:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 162 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:49:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8010724646641764368.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:49:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9375586790052979028.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8010724646641764368.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9375586790052979028.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.07919e+11,5.90511,181800,2,32423,5,791004,6,0,796,742458,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AF(EX(EF((((p110==1)&&(p169==1))&&(p184==1)))))) + ((AF(E(E((p187==1) U (p88==1)) U E((p60==1) U (p17==1)))) * A(((!(((p52==1)||(((p1...336
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((Init * !(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(EX(E(TRUE U (((p110==1)&&(p169==1))&&(p184==1)))))))))))),!(E(E((p187==1) U (p88...1491
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t4, t5, t6, t10, t21, t22, t28, t36, t42, t49, t56, t63, t71, t81, t87, t94, t101, t108, ...285
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-23 23:50:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-23 23:50:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7536563716185380596.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7536563716185380596.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7536563716185380596.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7536563716185380596.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7536563716185380596.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-23 23:50:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-23 23:50:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-23 23:50:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 54 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:50:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-23 23:50:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11829798736758485855.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability261670783302060159.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11829798736758485855.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability261670783302060159.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.07919e+11,0.050501,5932,343,28,4247,230,363,6050,46,462,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AF(EX(EF((((i6.i1.u39.p110==1)&&(i10.u55.p169==1))&&(i10.u60.p184==1)))))) + ((AF(E(E((i10.u58.p187==1) U (i5.i1.u31.p88==1)) U E((i3...531
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((Init * !(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(EX(E(TRUE U (((i6.i1.u39.p110==1)&&(i10.u55.p169==1))&&(i10.u60.p184==1)))))))))...2054
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t144, i1.t139, i1.i1.u4.t129, i2.t124, i2.i2.u15.t116, i3.t108, i3.i1.u17.t101, i4.t94, ...415
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,2.91375,109684,1,0,233192,368,2705,321295,234,970,201981
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 177 transition count 185
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 161 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 161 transition count 169
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 154 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 154 transition count 162
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 154 transition count 157
Applied a total of 52 rules in 10 ms. Remains 154 /178 variables (removed 24) and now considering 157/185 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 154 cols
[2024-05-23 23:50:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:50:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:50:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 156 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:50:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 157/310 variables, 153/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/311 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/311 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 311/311 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved in 4183 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 157/310 variables, 153/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 156/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/311 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/311 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 311/311 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved in 4632 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8829ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8830ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 154/178 places, 157/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8967 ms. Remains : 154/178 places, 157/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 157 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7401982869251125551.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability939155489284158602.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7401982869251125551.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability939155489284158602.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.62166e+11,5.1416,160912,2,29920,5,700472,6,0,775,680159,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((AX((p71==0)) * (p42==1)) * ((p22==1)&&(p99==1)))) + AG((!(E(!(((((p104==1)&&(p169==1))&&(p184==1))||(p91==1))) U EX((p109==1)))) + ...171
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !(EG(((!(EX(!((p71==0)))) * (p42==1)) * ((p22==1)&&(p99==1)))))),TRUE) * !(EX((p109==1))...232
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t4, t5, t6, t10, t21, t22, t27, t34, t41, t48, t55, t62, t69, t76, t83, t93, t100, t107, ...285
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9483454161775863701.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9483454161775863701.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9483454161775863701.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9483454161775863701.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9483454161775863701.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 63 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14776216350181661495.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17809571444456640097.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14776216350181661495.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17809571444456640097.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.62166e+11,0.052169,5944,393,28,4296,243,390,6428,44,480,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((AX((i3.i0.u26.p71==0)) * (i1.i3.u16.p42==1)) * ((i0.i1.u8.p22==1)&&(i5.i1.u36.p99==1)))) + AG((!(E(!(((((i5.i0.u39.p104==1)&&(i8.i1...270
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !(EG(((!(EX(!((i3.i0.u26.p71==0)))) * (i1.i3.u16.p42==1)) * ((i0.i1.u8.p22==1)&&(i5.i1.u...331
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t139, i0.t134, i0.i1.t127, i1.t121, i1.i3.t114, i2.i0.t100, i2.i0.u18.t107, i3.t93, i3.i2.t83...427
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,0,0.738716,36568,1,0,75394,446,2591,121018,229,1259,88958
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 177 transition count 185
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 162 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 162 transition count 170
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 155 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 155 transition count 163
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 155 transition count 157
Applied a total of 51 rules in 11 ms. Remains 155 /178 variables (removed 23) and now considering 157/185 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 155 cols
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 156 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:50:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 157/311 variables, 154/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/312 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 312/312 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved in 4425 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 155/155 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 157/311 variables, 154/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 156/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/312 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 0/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 312/312 variables, and 320 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved in 4793 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 155/155 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9237ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9238ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 155/178 places, 157/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9373 ms. Remains : 155/178 places, 157/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:51:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 157 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:51:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6021971712448075257.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14495880438510796247.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6021971712448075257.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14495880438510796247.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5641e+11,5.70256,176480,2,30874,5,762175,6,0,779,744449,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EX(((p160==0) * EG((p52==0))))) * AX(AX(EF((((p185==1)||(p44==1)) * EF((p73==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EX(((p160==0) * EG((p52==0))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(E(TRUE U (((p185==1)||(p44==1)) * E...186
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t7, t8, t12, t13, t24, t25, t30, t37, t44, t51, t58, t65, t72, t79, t86, t93, t100, t107,...286
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-23 23:51:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-23 23:51:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph88983870551213585.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph88983870551213585.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph88983870551213585.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph88983870551213585.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph88983870551213585.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-23 23:51:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-23 23:51:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-23 23:51:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 55 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:51:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2024-05-23 23:51:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6371781701623385985.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8646915408122568225.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6371781701623385985.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8646915408122568225.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5641e+11,0.063029,6192,337,40,5304,333,344,7015,48,724,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EX(((i8.u57.p160==0) * EG((i2.i0.u18.p52==0))))) * AX(AX(EF((((i9.i2.u62.p185==1)||(i1.i0.u10.p44==1)) * EF((i3.i0.u26.p73==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EX(((i8.u57.p160==0) * EG((i2.i0.u18.p52==0))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(E(TRUE U (((i9.i2....233
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t24, t139, i0.t134, i0.i1.u4.t127, i1.t121, i1.i0.t114, i2.t107, i2.i2.t100, i3.t93, i3.i...413
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,2.24826,82224,1,0,160157,452,2193,217582,253,1523,157666
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 157 edges and 178 vertex of which 7 / 178 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 261 edges and 172 vertex of which 159 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 13 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 13 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 90 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 90 transitions
Performed 90 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 90
Iterating post reduction 0 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 158 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 90 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 68 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 67 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 66 transition count 75
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 66 transition count 57
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 48 transition count 57
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 237 place count 40 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 40 transition count 49
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 25 transition count 34
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 24 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 23 transition count 32
Applied a total of 278 rules in 9 ms. Remains 23 /178 variables (removed 155) and now considering 32/185 (removed 153) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-23 23:51:36] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:51:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:51:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-23 23:51:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 49 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-23 23:51:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:51:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:51:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 31/49 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/54 variables, 5/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 208 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 31/49 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 18/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/54 variables, 5/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 8/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 263 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 485ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 485ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/178 places, 32/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 547 ms. Remains : 23/178 places, 32/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3357509208685221927.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12891720342040424054.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3357509208685221927.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12891720342040424054.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,185433,0.022362,4392,2,204,5,5325,6,0,123,5723,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((p63==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(p63==1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 30/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.037807,4656,1,0,8,5876,19,2,648,5723,8
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 177 transition count 185
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 161 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 161 transition count 169
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 153 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 153 transition count 161
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 153 transition count 155
Applied a total of 55 rules in 3 ms. Remains 153 /178 variables (removed 25) and now considering 155/185 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 153 cols
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 154 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:51:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 155/307 variables, 152/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/308 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 308/308 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 4175 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 155/307 variables, 152/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 154/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/308 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 308/308 variables, and 316 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 4546 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8739ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8741ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/178 places, 155/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8868 ms. Remains : 153/178 places, 155/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6801802487568716802.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:51:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1608567235319756314.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6801802487568716802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1608567235319756314.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52757e+11,7.16315,203972,2,34431,5,880057,6,0,769,855544,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(A(EG((p30==1)) U !(EF((p127==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U (p127==1))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U (p127==1)))) U (!(EG((p30==1))) * !(!(E(TRUE ...182
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t4, t5, t6, t10, t21, t22, t27, t34, t41, t48, t55, t62, t69, t76, t83, t90, t97, t104, t...284
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-23 23:52:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-23 23:52:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17086793393389918743.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17086793393389918743.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17086793393389918743.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17086793393389918743.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17086793393389918743.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-23 23:52:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-23 23:52:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-23 23:52:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:52:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-23 23:52:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6952972757148862263.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8923938136745756122.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6952972757148862263.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8923938136745756122.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52757e+11,0.051929,5888,342,35,4216,410,368,6083,50,921,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(A(EG((i2.i0.u12.p30==1)) U !(EF((i7.i0.u42.p127==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U (i7.i0.u42.p127==1))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U (i7.i0.u42.p127==1)))) U (!(EG((i2....222
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t137, i1.t132, i1.i1.u9.t125, i2.t120, i2.i2.u15.t112, i3.t104, i3.i1.u17.t97, i4.t90, i...415
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,1.82725,69248,1,0,156313,454,2405,178901,270,1298,141083
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 185/185 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 177 transition count 185
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 162 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 162 transition count 170
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 156 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 156 transition count 164
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 156 transition count 160
Applied a total of 47 rules in 16 ms. Remains 156 /178 variables (removed 22) and now considering 160/185 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 156 cols
[2024-05-23 23:52:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 23:52:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 23:52:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 159 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:52:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 160/315 variables, 155/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/316 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/316 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 316/316 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 4449 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 156/156 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 160/315 variables, 155/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 159/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/316 variables, 1/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/316 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 316/316 variables, and 324 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 4270 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 156/156 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8750ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8752ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 156/178 places, 160/185 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8885 ms. Remains : 156/178 places, 160/185 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:52:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:52:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14829661793729212201.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11540625621332724567.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14829661793729212201.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11540625621332724567.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.01533e+11,5.00259,156880,2,29217,5,684347,6,0,786,660825,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(AX((AF((p83==0)) + (p179==0)))) + (E((EF(((p130==1)&&(p102==1))) + !(EG((p111==1)))) U EG(E((((p122==1)&&(p169==1))&&(p184==1)) U (p...284
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((!(EG(!((p83==0)))) + (p179==0))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG((Init * E((E(TRUE U ((p130==1)&&(p102...453
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t4, t5, t7, t11, t22, t23, t28, t35, t42, t49, t57, t65, t71, t80, t87, t94, t101, t110, ...285
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-23 23:52:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-23 23:52:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8003593437557263353.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8003593437557263353.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8003593437557263353.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8003593437557263353.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8003593437557263353.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-23 23:52:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-23 23:52:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-23 23:52:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 49 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-23 23:52:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2024-05-23 23:52:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3248884362067360552.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 23:52:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3122295118818501501.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3248884362067360552.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3122295118818501501.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.01533e+11,0.059803,5424,502,28,3520,216,385,4795,48,396,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(AX((AF((i5.i0.u29.p83==0)) + (i0.u59.p179==0)))) + (E((EF(((i7.i1.u44.p130==1)&&(i6.i0.u36.p102==1))) + !(EG((i6.i1.u37.p111==1)))) ...422
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((!(EG(!((i5.i0.u29.p83==0)))) + (i0.u59.p179==0))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG((Init * E((E(TRUE U ...609
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t22, t142, i0.t11, i0.t4, i0.u53.t23, i0.u58.t5, i0.u59.t7, i1.t137, i1.i1.u8.t130, i2.t1...416
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,3.97884,139800,1,0,271529,344,2015,316919,216,1302,287377
FORMULA GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-23 23:53:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 23:53:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 467730 ms.

BK_STOP 1716508381047

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r180-tall-171640603500490"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b.tgz
mv GPUForwardProgress-PT-08b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;