fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r179-tall-171640602200713
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for HealthRecord-PT-03

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
414.203 41139.00 67160.00 233.80 FFFTFTFTTFTTFFTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r179-tall-171640602200713.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is HealthRecord-PT-03, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r179-tall-171640602200713
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 524K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Apr 22 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Apr 22 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 12 20:12 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 160K Apr 12 20:12 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Apr 12 20:11 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Apr 12 20:11 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716490196220

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-03
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 66 ms
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Transformed 121 places.
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Transformed 232 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 121 places and 232 transitions and 597 arcs in 166 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 18 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 7 transitions.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 82 out of 121 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 225/225 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 106 transition count 195
Applied a total of 30 rules in 20 ms. Remains 106 /121 variables (removed 15) and now considering 195/225 (removed 30) transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 187 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned []
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 187 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 324 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 194 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 187 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 18:49:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 11/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 186/292 variables, 106/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 5/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/293 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/293 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 293/293 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 14219 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 62/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 186/292 variables, 106/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 194/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/293 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/293 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 293/293 variables, and 380 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 14478 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints]
After SMT, in 28808ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28828ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/121 places, 195/225 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29192 ms. Remains : 106/121 places, 195/225 transitions.
Support contains 82 out of 106 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:26] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-23 18:50:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 106 places (down from 82) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2673 resets) in 1580 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 25/77 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (39 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (38 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (37 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (34 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (37 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (40 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (40 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (40 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (37 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
[2024-05-23 18:50:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 187 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-23 18:50:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-23 18:50:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 41/76 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 30/106 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 14/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 10/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 186/292 variables, 106/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/293 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/293 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 293/293 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved in 2448 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 44/75 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 8/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 5/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 23 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 31/106 variables, 6/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 22/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-23 18:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-23 18:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 186/292 variables, 106/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 22/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/293 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/293 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 293/293 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved in 1918 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/25 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints]
After SMT, in 4377ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
Fused 22 Parikh solutions to 21 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 8850 steps, including 380 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 125 ms. (steps per millisecond=70 )
Parikh walk visited 22 properties in 2692 ms.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2024-05-23 18:50:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
Computed a total of 10 stabilizing places and 18 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 63 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 63 transition count 115
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 57 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 57 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 57 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 56 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 56 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 55 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 55 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 55 transition count 95
Applied a total of 105 rules in 10 ms. Remains 55 /106 variables (removed 51) and now considering 95/195 (removed 100) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10 ms. Remains : 55/106 places, 95/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 65 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 65 transition count 119
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 60 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 60 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 60 transition count 107
Applied a total of 94 rules in 4 ms. Remains 60 /106 variables (removed 46) and now considering 107/195 (removed 88) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 60/106 places, 107/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 68 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 68 transition count 123
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 64 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 64 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 64 transition count 113
Applied a total of 86 rules in 5 ms. Remains 64 /106 variables (removed 42) and now considering 113/195 (removed 82) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 64/106 places, 113/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 142 edges and 106 vertex of which 8 / 106 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 57 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 57 transition count 109
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 47 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 47 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 47 transition count 84
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 44 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 44 transition count 75
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 41 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 41 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 41 transition count 66
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 41 transition count 63
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 39 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 38 transition count 60
Applied a total of 137 rules in 31 ms. Remains 38 /106 variables (removed 68) and now considering 60/195 (removed 135) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31 ms. Remains : 38/106 places, 60/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 65 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 65 transition count 118
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 57 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 57 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 57 transition count 99
Applied a total of 101 rules in 5 ms. Remains 57 /106 variables (removed 49) and now considering 99/195 (removed 96) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 57/106 places, 99/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 58 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 58 transition count 106
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 50 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 50 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 50 transition count 86
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 47 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 47 transition count 77
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 44 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 44 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 44 transition count 68
Applied a total of 131 rules in 6 ms. Remains 44 /106 variables (removed 62) and now considering 68/195 (removed 127) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 44/106 places, 68/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 60 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 60 transition count 109
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 51 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 51 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 51 transition count 87
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 48 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 48 transition count 78
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 45 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 45 transition count 72
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 45 transition count 70
Applied a total of 128 rules in 7 ms. Remains 45 /106 variables (removed 61) and now considering 70/195 (removed 125) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 45/106 places, 70/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 70 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 61 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 61 transition count 112
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 56 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 56 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 56 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 55 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 55 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 54 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 54 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 54 transition count 94
Applied a total of 107 rules in 7 ms. Remains 54 /106 variables (removed 52) and now considering 94/195 (removed 101) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 54/106 places, 94/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 59 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 59 transition count 107
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 52 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 52 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 52 transition count 91
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 49 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 49 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 47 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 47 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 47 transition count 76
Applied a total of 122 rules in 6 ms. Remains 47 /106 variables (removed 59) and now considering 76/195 (removed 119) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 47/106 places, 76/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 68 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 68 transition count 124
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 63 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 63 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 63 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 62 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 62 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 61 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 61 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 61 transition count 107
Applied a total of 92 rules in 5 ms. Remains 61 /106 variables (removed 45) and now considering 107/195 (removed 88) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 61/106 places, 107/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 65 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 65 transition count 120
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 57 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 57 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 57 transition count 101
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 54 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 54 transition count 92
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 51 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 51 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 51 transition count 83
Applied a total of 116 rules in 4 ms. Remains 51 /106 variables (removed 55) and now considering 83/195 (removed 112) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 51/106 places, 83/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 64 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 64 transition count 117
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 56 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 56 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 56 transition count 99
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 54 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 54 transition count 93
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 52 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 52 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 52 transition count 88
Applied a total of 111 rules in 4 ms. Remains 52 /106 variables (removed 54) and now considering 88/195 (removed 107) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 52/106 places, 88/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 195/195 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 59 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 59 transition count 108
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 52 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 52 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 52 transition count 92
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 49 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 49 transition count 83
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 46 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 46 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 46 transition count 74
Applied a total of 125 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /106 variables (removed 60) and now considering 74/195 (removed 121) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 46/106 places, 74/195 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 13 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.sr.xml took 4 ms.
[2024-05-23 18:50:35] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 106 places, 195 transitions and 523 arcs took 2 ms.
Total runtime 38046 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN-meddly tool, MCC 2023
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Running HealthRecord-PT-03

IS_COLORED=
IS_NUPN=

LOADING PETRI NET FILE /home/mcc/execution/413/model.pnml (PNML) ...
PNML VERSION 2009, P/T NET.
COLOR CLASSES: 0
CONSTANTS: 0
PLACES: 106
TRANSITIONS: 195
COLOR VARS: 0
MEASURES: 0
LOADING TIME: [User 0.003s, Sys 0.000s]


SAVING FILE /home/mcc/execution/413/model (.net / .def) ...
EXPORT TIME: [User 0.000s, Sys 0.000s]


----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN/Meddly.
Copyright (C) 1987-2022, University of Torino, Italy.
website: https://github.com/greatspn/SOURCES

Based on MEDDLY version 0.16.0
Copyright (C) 2009, Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.
website: http://meddly.sourceforge.net

Process ID: 886
MODEL NAME: /home/mcc/execution/413/model
106 places, 195 transitions.

Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Building monolithic NSF...
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
Ok.
EXITCODE: 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------

BK_STOP 1716490237359

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-03"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-03, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r179-tall-171640602200713"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-03.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-03 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;