Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r158-smll-171636266600290.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is FMS-PT-00010, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r158-smll-171636266600290
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 436K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 22 14:43 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 22 14:43 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:43 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 22 14:43 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K Apr 11 22:03 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K Apr 11 22:03 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 11 22:03 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 107K Apr 11 22:02 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K Apr 22 14:43 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 22 14:43 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716582636653

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=FMS-PT-00010
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-24 20:30:38] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-24 20:30:38] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-24 20:30:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 79 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:39] [INFO ] Transformed 22 places.
[2024-05-24 20:30:39] [INFO ] Transformed 20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 22 places and 20 transitions and 50 arcs in 294 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 34 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 22 out of 22 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-24 20:30:39] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 229 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:30:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 392 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 42/42 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 485 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 42/42 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 358 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 892ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 911ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1364 ms. Remains : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Support contains 22 out of 22 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1446 steps (0 resets) in 191 ms. (7 steps per ms) remains 0/34 properties
[2024-05-24 20:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:30:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 42/42 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 379 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 42/42 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 317 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 712ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 714ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 855 ms. Remains : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4597597727230585485.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14295924944715695097.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4597597727230585485.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14295924944715695097.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50141e+09,0.086231,4716,2,823,5,9046,6,0,111,8365,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(E(((EX((P2M2>=1)) * (P1d>=1)) * ((E(((P2wM2>=1)&&(M2>=1)) U (P1d>=1)) + (P2M2>=1)) + ((P12wM3>=1)&&(M3>=1)))) U (((P2<1)&&(P2wM2>=1...222
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),((EX((P2M2>=1)) * (P1d>=1)) * ((E(((P2wM2>=1)&&(M2>=1)) U (P1d>=1)) + (P2M2>=1)) + ((...275
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 16/3/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.428986,10776,1,0,17,47409,24,7,673,42168,15
FORMULA FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 22 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 18 transition count 15
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 15 transition count 15
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 15 transition count 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 14 transition count 14
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 13 transition count 13
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 13 transition count 13
Applied a total of 17 rules in 66 ms. Remains 13 /22 variables (removed 9) and now considering 13/20 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 13 rows 13 cols
[2024-05-24 20:30:42] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:30:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 13/26 variables, 13/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/26 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 26/26 variables, and 17 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 174 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 13/26 variables, 13/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/26 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 26/26 variables, and 26 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 169 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 351ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 351ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 13/22 places, 13/20 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 507 ms. Remains : 13/22 places, 13/20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 13 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13641072255473048662.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3994512998963249320.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13641072255473048662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3994512998963249320.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.10939e+06,0.021381,3680,2,254,5,2299,6,0,68,2029,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((A(EF((P2d>=1)) U ((M2>=1)&&(P3M2>=1))) + EF(((((P12>=1)&&(P1wP2>=1))&&(P2wP1>=1))||(P1>=1)))) U EG(EF(((P1>=1)||(P2d>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((!((E(!(((M2>=1)&&(P3M2>=1))) U (!(E(TRUE U (P2d>=1))) * !(((M2>=1)&&(P3M2>=1))))) + EG(...290
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.116677,5264,1,0,12,10320,27,3,406,9202,19
FORMULA FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 42/42 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 331 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 42/42 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 319 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 661ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 662ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 767 ms. Remains : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17458797981176019004.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6790430599789988247.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17458797981176019004.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6790430599789988247.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50141e+09,0.075985,4788,2,823,5,9046,6,0,111,8365,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AG(EX(A(((P1wP2>=1)&&(P2wP1>=1)) U (P2>=1))))) U (!((!(A((P3>=1) U (P1M1>=1))) + EX(((P1<1) * AF((P1>=1)))))) + AG((P1>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((E(!((P2>=1)) U (!(((P1wP2>=1)&&(P2wP1>=1))) * !((P2>=1)))) + EG(!((P2>=1))))...443
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 18/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 17/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.702285,15288,1,0,15,73778,50,6,762,66870,21
FORMULA FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 42/42 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 355 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 42/42 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 284 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 650ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 651ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 749 ms. Remains : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability353627634505447412.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15188767647885620327.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability353627634505447412.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15188767647885620327.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50141e+09,0.068781,4788,2,823,5,9046,6,0,111,8365,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((P2<1)) + (EX((P3<1)) * EF(((AF((P2s<1)) + !(E((P2>=1) U ((P2wM2>=1)&&(M2>=1))))) + !(A((P12>=1) U ((P12>=1)&&(P12s>=1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (P2<1))] != FALSE + (([(FwdU((Init * EX((P3<1))),TRUE) * !(EG(!((P2s<1)))))] != FALSE + [(F...435
(forward)formula 0,1,0.071134,5052,1,0,7,9046,8,1,114,8365,1
FORMULA FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:30:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 42/42 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 300 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 42/42 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 309 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 622ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 625ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 730 ms. Remains : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12014260203678056081.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8020347322477472340.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12014260203678056081.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8020347322477472340.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50141e+09,0.074726,4788,2,823,5,9046,6,0,111,8365,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((P1M1>=1) + AX(((P1M1>=1) + AX((P1d>=1))))) + (P1d>=1)) U EF((P1<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (P1<1)))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U (P1<1))) U (!((((P1M1>=1) + !(EX(!(((P1M1>=1) + !(EX(!((P...218
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.243067,7164,1,0,6,22348,24,1,654,13749,7
FORMULA FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:30:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 42/42 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 244 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 42/42 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 189 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 444ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 444ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 543 ms. Remains : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14282345661587663970.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4657206364087460528.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14282345661587663970.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4657206364087460528.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50141e+09,0.047092,4788,2,823,5,9046,6,0,111,8365,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((P2M2>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((P2M2>=1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.143295,6900,1,0,6,22774,11,0,595,12426,4
FORMULA FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 42/42 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 342 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 42/42 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 238 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 591ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 592ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 673 ms. Remains : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10939636282073775884.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2253405831836657042.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10939636282073775884.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2253405831836657042.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50141e+09,0.074486,4788,2,823,5,9046,6,0,111,8365,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EX(AF(((P1wM1>=1)&&(M1>=1))))) + EG(EF(AG((P1s>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((P1s>=1)))))))),TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!(((P1wM1>=1)&&(M1>=1))))))))] = FAL...157
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.430861,10860,1,0,10,47414,31,4,691,38653,12
FORMULA FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 42/42 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 315 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 42/42 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 272 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 593ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 594ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 666 ms. Remains : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1873078012345346284.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9470126327234046452.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1873078012345346284.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9470126327234046452.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50141e+09,0.073231,4788,2,823,5,9046,6,0,111,8365,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((AX((P3>=1)) + AG(((AF((P2s>=1)) * (P2<1)) * (P1s<1)))) + (((P12wM3>=1)&&(M3>=1)) + (AX((P3<1)) * EF((P1d<1))))) + ((P2<1)&&((M2<1)|...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((P2<1)&&((M2<1)||(P3M2<1))))) * !((!(EX(!((P3>=1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !(((!(EG(!((P2s>...447
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.342671,9276,1,0,26,36511,32,13,668,29079,18
FORMULA FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 42/42 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 325 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 42/42 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 308 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 640ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 641ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 732 ms. Remains : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5563769362207601404.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8121011063227498552.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5563769362207601404.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8121011063227498552.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50141e+09,0.074237,4784,2,823,5,9046,6,0,111,8365,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(EX((((P2d>=1)||(P12>=1))&&((P2d>=1)||(P1>=1))))) * !(EX(EX((((P12M3>=1)&&(M2>=1))&&(P3M2>=1)))))) U ((P12wM3>=1)&&(M3>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(EX((((P2d>=1)||(P12>=1))&&((P2d>=1)||(P1>=1))))) * !(EX(EX((((P12M3>=1)&&(M2>=1))&&(P3M2>=1))))))...192
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.584474,14024,1,0,157,64680,16,147,623,68484,224
FORMULA FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 42/42 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 212 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/42 variables, 22/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 17/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/42 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 42/42 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 172 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 389ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 389ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 456 ms. Remains : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4964936452901933957.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:30:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2605043325924170857.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4964936452901933957.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2605043325924170857.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50141e+09,0.076856,4792,2,823,5,9046,6,0,111,8365,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((AG(((P2d<1)||(P1d<1))) * (((EX(((M2>=1)&&(P3M2>=1))) + (P1s>=1)) + ((P1d>=1)||(P1>=1))) + (((P2wM2>=1)&&(M2>=1)) + ((EG((P2<1)) * ...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((P2d<1)||(P1d<1))))) * (((EX(((M2>=1)&&(P3M2>=1))) + (P1s>=1)) + ((P1d...264
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.452713,11392,1,0,20,51602,30,6,664,46081,16
FORMULA FMS-PT-00010-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 22/22 places, 20/20 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 22 transition count 15
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 11 edges and 15 vertex of which 9 / 15 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 9 transition count 15
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 8 transition count 9
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 8 transition count 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 7 transition count 8
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 6 transition count 7
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 6 transition count 5
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 6 transition count 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Application raised an uncaught exception Index 10 out of bounds for length 4
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 10 out of bounds for length 4
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.outOfBounds(Preconditions.java:64)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.outOfBoundsCheckIndex(Preconditions.java:70)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.checkIndex(Preconditions.java:266)
at java.base/java.util.Objects.checkIndex(Objects.java:361)
at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:427)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.StructuralReduction.ensureUnique(StructuralReduction.java:916)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.StructuralReduction.ruleReducePlaces(StructuralReduction.java:1056)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.StructuralReduction.reduce(StructuralReduction.java:240)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.ReachabilitySolver.applyReductions(ReachabilitySolver.java:598)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:845)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:189)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:45)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:136)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:402)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:651)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:588)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1459)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1432)
Total runtime 13172 ms.

BK_STOP 1716582652189

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="FMS-PT-00010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is FMS-PT-00010, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r158-smll-171636266600290"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/FMS-PT-00010.tgz
mv FMS-PT-00010 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;