About the Execution of ITS-Tools for DoubleExponent-PT-002
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
657.035 | 62536.00 | 97394.00 | 399.30 | FTFTTFTFTTFFFTFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r136-tall-171631132900532.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is DoubleExponent-PT-002, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r136-tall-171631132900532
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 560K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:41 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K Apr 22 14:41 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:41 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 22 14:41 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 12 03:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 141K Apr 12 03:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 12 03:15 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 125K Apr 12 03:15 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:41 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:41 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716385000172
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DoubleExponent-PT-002
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-22 13:36:41] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-22 13:36:41] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-22 13:36:41] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 49 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:41] [INFO ] Transformed 110 places.
[2024-05-22 13:36:41] [INFO ] Transformed 98 transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:36:41] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 110 places and 98 transitions and 276 arcs in 138 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 35 out of 110 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 106 transition count 98
Applied a total of 4 rules in 21 ms. Remains 106 /110 variables (removed 4) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:41] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 13 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned [73]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 227 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/110 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 268 ms. Remains : 105/110 places, 98/98 transitions.
Support contains 35 out of 105 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-22 13:36:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 26 to 25
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1316 resets) in 1935 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 11/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (1121 resets) in 471 ms. (84 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (1150 resets) in 172 ms. (231 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (1116 resets) in 177 ms. (224 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (1123 resets) in 155 ms. (256 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (1134 resets) in 157 ms. (253 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (1152 resets) in 272 ms. (146 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (1118 resets) in 128 ms. (310 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (1149 resets) in 131 ms. (303 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (1151 resets) in 153 ms. (259 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (1120 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (1133 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:43] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 15/33 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 53/86 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/87 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 91/178 variables, 87/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 20/198 variables, 15/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 4/202 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/203 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 203/203 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved in 1029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 15/30 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 54/84 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 88/173 variables, 85/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 5/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 23/196 variables, 16/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 4/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 4/200 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 3/203 variables, 2/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/203 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 203/203 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved in 864 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/11 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1938ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 2646 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 87 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 83 transition count 76
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 83 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 6 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 78 transition count 71
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 61 transition count 54
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 59 transition count 54
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 59 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 58 transition count 53
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 6 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 58 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 52 transition count 47
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 52 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 51 transition count 46
Applied a total of 113 rules in 41 ms. Remains 51 /105 variables (removed 54) and now considering 46/98 (removed 52) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 51/105 places, 46/98 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (4421 resets) in 512 ms. (77 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3052 resets) in 409 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3053 resets) in 127 ms. (312 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3078 resets) in 109 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:48] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/13 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 26/39 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/41 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 44/85 variables, 41/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 4/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 11/96 variables, 9/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/97 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 97/97 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 105 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/13 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 26/39 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/41 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 44/85 variables, 41/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 4/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 11/96 variables, 9/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/97 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 97/97 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 103 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 213ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 179 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 51 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 51/51 places, 46/46 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 51 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 50 transition count 45
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 49 transition count 44
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 44
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 48 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 47 transition count 43
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 47 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 46 transition count 42
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 46 transition count 42
Applied a total of 11 rules in 20 ms. Remains 46 /51 variables (removed 5) and now considering 42/46 (removed 4) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 20 ms. Remains : 46/51 places, 42/46 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5458 resets) in 73 ms. (540 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3492 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3586 resets) in 113 ms. (350 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 844 steps, run visited all 2 properties in 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 )
Probabilistic random walk after 844 steps, saw 456 distinct states, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=56 ) properties seen :2
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 10 simplifications.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 170 edges and 105 vertex of which 103 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((X(p1)&&p0))))'
Support contains 4 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:49] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [75]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:49] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:36:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:36:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/105 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 218 ms. Remains : 103/105 places, 97/98 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 238 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-00
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 22 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-00 finished in 511 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(G(p0))&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 105 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 85 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 81 transition count 74
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 81 transition count 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 76 transition count 69
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 58 transition count 51
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 56 transition count 51
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 56 transition count 51
Applied a total of 100 rules in 25 ms. Remains 56 /105 variables (removed 49) and now considering 51/98 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:49] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [39]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 37 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/105 places, 51/98 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 152 edges and 55 vertex of which 54 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 53 transition count 49
Applied a total of 3 rules in 5 ms. Remains 53 /55 variables (removed 2) and now considering 49/51 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:49] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:36:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:36:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 13:36:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 53/105 places, 49/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 186 ms. Remains : 53/105 places, 49/98 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 117 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10817 reset in 204 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10821 reset in 134 ms.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 149 edges and 53 vertex of which 52 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 95 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (4305 resets) in 198 ms. (201 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (2837 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (2779 resets) in 66 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 228 steps, run visited all 2 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=57 )
Probabilistic random walk after 228 steps, saw 121 distinct states, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties seen :2
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 154 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 111 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 119 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 4 out of 53 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 49/49 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 49/49 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:36:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:36:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:36:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:36:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 13:36:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 13:36:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 48 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:36:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:36:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 49/102 variables, 53/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/102 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 993 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 49/102 variables, 53/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 48/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/102 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 2027ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2028ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2154 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 49/49 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 149 edges and 53 vertex of which 52 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 80 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 132 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (4324 resets) in 70 ms. (563 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (2813 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
[2024-05-22 13:36:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:36:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 27/29 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/33 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/35 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 38/73 variables, 35/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 21/94 variables, 11/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 4/98 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 4/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/102 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 58 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 27/29 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/33 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/35 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 38/73 variables, 35/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 21/94 variables, 11/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 4/98 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 4/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/102 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 65 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 127ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 53 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 49/49 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 143 edges and 53 vertex of which 52 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 52 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 49 transition count 45
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 48 transition count 44
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 4 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 48 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 44 transition count 40
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 7 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 44 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 43 transition count 39
Applied a total of 26 rules in 12 ms. Remains 43 /53 variables (removed 10) and now considering 39/49 (removed 10) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 12 ms. Remains : 43/53 places, 39/49 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 38278 steps (4817 resets) in 42 ms. (890 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 129 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 145 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 134 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10784 reset in 93 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10816 reset in 128 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin1065939400284282365
[2024-05-22 13:36:54] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 49 transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:36:54] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 7 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 13:36:54] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 49 transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:36:54] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 13:36:54] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 49 transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:36:54] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 13:36:54] [INFO ] Built C files in 39ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin1065939400284282365
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1065939400284282365;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 297 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1065939400284282365;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 47 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin1065939400284282365;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased2714554818753952540.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 122 ms.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-01 finished in 5330 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((((p1||X(!p2)) U p2)||p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 84 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 83 transition count 76
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 83 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 79 transition count 72
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 62 transition count 55
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 61 transition count 55
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 61 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 60 transition count 54
Applied a total of 88 rules in 19 ms. Remains 60 /105 variables (removed 45) and now considering 54/98 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [45]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/105 places, 54/98 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 146 edges and 59 vertex of which 58 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 57 transition count 52
Applied a total of 3 rules in 4 ms. Remains 57 /59 variables (removed 2) and now considering 52/54 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 57 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 57/105 places, 52/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 191 ms. Remains : 57/105 places, 52/98 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 41 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 11 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-02 finished in 246 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0||G(p1)||G(F(p2))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [75]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/105 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 214 ms. Remains : 103/105 places, 97/98 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 250 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3522 reset in 176 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3540 reset in 196 ms.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 167 edges and 103 vertex of which 101 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 102 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 64 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
RANDOM walk for 106 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p2))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 117 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 55 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Support contains 1 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 97/97 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 167 edges and 103 vertex of which 102 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 101 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 80 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 79 transition count 73
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 79 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 74 transition count 68
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 55 transition count 49
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 53 transition count 49
Applied a total of 97 rules in 12 ms. Remains 53 /103 variables (removed 50) and now considering 49/97 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:56] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 13:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:36:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 13:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 13:36:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 48 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:36:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 49/102 variables, 53/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/102 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1137 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 49/102 variables, 53/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 48/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/102 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 928 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 2078ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2079ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/103 places, 49/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2195 ms. Remains : 53/103 places, 49/97 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 150 edges and 53 vertex of which 52 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p2, (X p2), (X (X p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 90 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
RANDOM walk for 46 steps (1 resets) in 4 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p2, (X p2), (X (X p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p2))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 102 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 77 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 60 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9259 reset in 75 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9262 reset in 82 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin7164966576317889405
[2024-05-22 13:36:59] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 49 transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:36:59] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 13:36:59] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 49 transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:36:59] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 13:36:59] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 49 transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:36:59] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 13:36:59] [INFO ] Built C files in 5ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin7164966576317889405
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7164966576317889405;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 147 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7164966576317889405;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 29 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin7164966576317889405;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased3272557198318631762.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 139 ms.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-04 finished in 4517 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||(F(G(p0)) U p1)))'
Support contains 4 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 104 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 87 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 84 transition count 77
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 84 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 78 transition count 71
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 59 transition count 52
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 57 transition count 52
Applied a total of 94 rules in 7 ms. Remains 57 /105 variables (removed 48) and now considering 52/98 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 57 cols
[2024-05-22 13:36:59] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [41]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/105 places, 52/98 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 149 edges and 56 vertex of which 55 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 54 transition count 50
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 54 transition count 50
Applied a total of 3 rules in 3 ms. Remains 54 /56 variables (removed 2) and now considering 50/52 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 54/105 places, 50/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 170 ms. Remains : 54/105 places, 50/98 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 136 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 9 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-05 finished in 319 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(!p0))'
Support contains 1 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 104 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 79 transition count 72
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 79 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 75 transition count 68
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 54 transition count 47
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 52 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 51 transition count 46
Applied a total of 105 rules in 7 ms. Remains 51 /105 variables (removed 54) and now considering 46/98 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/105 places, 46/98 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 143 edges and 50 vertex of which 49 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 48 transition count 44
Applied a total of 3 rules in 2 ms. Remains 48 /50 variables (removed 2) and now considering 44/46 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/105 places, 44/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 183 ms. Remains : 48/105 places, 44/98 transitions.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 53 ms :[true, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-07 finished in 250 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(p0)||G(F(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:37:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/203 variables, 105/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 7/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/203 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 203/203 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 3286 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 9/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/203 variables, 105/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 97/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 2/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/203 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 203/203 variables, and 223 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 4960 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 8260ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8263ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8406 ms. Remains : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 148 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3289 reset in 72 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3345 reset in 116 ms.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 170 edges and 105 vertex of which 103 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Detected a total of 7/105 stabilizing places and 7/98 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 112 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1332 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (1122 resets) in 63 ms. (625 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (1134 resets) in 72 ms. (547 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-05-22 13:37:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 16/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 50/69 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 14/83 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 86/169 variables, 83/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 25/194 variables, 17/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 4/198 variables, 2/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 4/202 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem apf0 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/203 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 203/203 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 165 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 11/13 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 62/75 variables, 5/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 6/81 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/83 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 86/169 variables, 83/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 25/194 variables, 17/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 4/198 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 4/202 variables, 2/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/203 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 203/203 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 131 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 317ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 16 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 105 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 80 transition count 73
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 80 transition count 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 76 transition count 69
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 54 transition count 47
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 52 transition count 47
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 4 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 52 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 48 transition count 43
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 48 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 47 transition count 42
Applied a total of 123 rules in 10 ms. Remains 47 /105 variables (removed 58) and now considering 42/98 (removed 56) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 10 ms. Remains : 47/105 places, 42/98 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5047 resets) in 44 ms. (888 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3435 resets) in 25 ms. (1538 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 1710 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=244 )
Probabilistic random walk after 1710 steps, saw 886 distinct states, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=244 ) properties seen :1
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (G (OR p0 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 194 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 105 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 103 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 3 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 104 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 79 transition count 72
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 79 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 75 transition count 68
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 56 transition count 49
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 54 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 53 transition count 48
Applied a total of 101 rules in 5 ms. Remains 53 /105 variables (removed 52) and now considering 48/98 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-22 13:37:10] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 13:37:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:37:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 13:37:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 13:37:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 47 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:37:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 48/101 variables, 53/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 101/101 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 542 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 48/101 variables, 53/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 47/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 101/101 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 651 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1209ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1211ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/105 places, 48/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1315 ms. Remains : 53/105 places, 48/98 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 152 edges and 53 vertex of which 51 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Detected a total of 2/53 stabilizing places and 2/48 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 108 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (4337 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (2795 resets) in 79 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (2787 resets) in 44 ms. (888 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-05-22 13:37:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/33 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 11/44 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 2/46 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 47/93 variables, 46/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem apf0 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 8/101 variables, 7/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 101/101 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 86 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/7 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 31/38 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/42 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 4/46 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 47/93 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 8/101 variables, 7/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 101/101 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 87 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 177ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 7 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 53 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 48/48 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 52 transition count 47
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 4 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 52 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 48 transition count 43
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 48 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 47 transition count 42
Applied a total of 19 rules in 6 ms. Remains 47 /53 variables (removed 6) and now considering 42/48 (removed 6) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 47/53 places, 42/48 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5091 resets) in 57 ms. (689 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3475 resets) in 28 ms. (1379 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 1960 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=178 )
Probabilistic random walk after 1960 steps, saw 1010 distinct states, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=178 ) properties seen :1
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (G (OR p0 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 223 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 97 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 113 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 95 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10902 reset in 78 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10846 reset in 88 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin11540760698327304139
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 48 transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 48 transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 48 transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Built C files in 3ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin11540760698327304139
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11540760698327304139;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 374 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11540760698327304139;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin11540760698327304139;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased17665485085656654666.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 156 ms.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-09 finished in 13073 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||X(G((!p0||X((p1||G(p2)))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [75]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/105 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 183 ms. Remains : 103/105 places, 97/98 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[true, false, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), false, (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3300 reset in 65 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3347 reset in 71 ms.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 167 edges and 103 vertex of which 101 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Detected a total of 7/103 stabilizing places and 7/97 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 93 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 191 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1321 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 2/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (1129 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (1153 resets) in 76 ms. (519 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-05-22 13:37:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/12 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/19 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 54/73 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 79/153 variables, 74/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 33/186 variables, 21/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 8/194 variables, 4/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 5/199 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem apf2 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 1/200 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 200/200 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 164 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 65/66 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 6/72 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/74 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/153 variables, 74/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 33/186 variables, 21/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 8/194 variables, 4/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 5/199 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1/200 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 200/200 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 89 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 255ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 8 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 97/97 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 167 edges and 103 vertex of which 101 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 101 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 76 transition count 70
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 76 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 71 transition count 65
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 50 transition count 44
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 48 transition count 44
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 5 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 48 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 43 transition count 39
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 43 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 42 transition count 38
Applied a total of 127 rules in 6 ms. Remains 42 /103 variables (removed 61) and now considering 38/97 (removed 59) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 42/103 places, 38/97 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 15699 steps (1974 resets) in 21 ms. (713 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F p0), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 275 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 197 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 207 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)]
Support contains 4 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:37:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:37:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:37:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/103 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/200 variables, 103/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 4/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 200/200 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 3891 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/103 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 9/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/200 variables, 103/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 96/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 200/200 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 4570 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 8472ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8473ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8612 ms. Remains : 103/103 places, 97/97 transitions.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 167 edges and 103 vertex of which 101 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Detected a total of 7/103 stabilizing places and 7/97 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 164 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)]
RANDOM walk for 33999 steps (1128 resets) in 39 ms. (849 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p0), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 327 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 194 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 215 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 202 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3272 reset in 73 ms.
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 62456 steps with 2066 reset in 43 ms.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-10 finished in 11983 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((!p0 U X(G(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [75]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/105 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2024-05-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/105 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 193 ms. Remains : 103/105 places, 97/98 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Running random walk in product with property : DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3324 reset in 85 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3350 reset in 140 ms.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 167 edges and 103 vertex of which 101 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 81 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1328 resets) in 54 ms. (727 steps per ms) remains 1/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (1134 resets) in 31 ms. (1250 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-22 13:37:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 11/13 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 54/67 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/73 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/75 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 81/156 variables, 75/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 32/188 variables, 21/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 7/195 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 4/199 variables, 2/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 1/200 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 200/200 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 180 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 11/13 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 54/67 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/73 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/75 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 81/156 variables, 75/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 32/188 variables, 21/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 7/195 variables, 4/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 4/199 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 1/200 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 200/200 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 119 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 313ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 23 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 97/97 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 167 edges and 103 vertex of which 101 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 101 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 77 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 76 transition count 70
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 76 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 71 transition count 65
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 51 transition count 45
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 49 transition count 45
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 6 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 49 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 43 transition count 39
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 43 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 42 transition count 38
Applied a total of 127 rules in 5 ms. Remains 42 /103 variables (removed 61) and now considering 38/97 (removed 59) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 42/103 places, 38/97 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5079 resets) in 64 ms. (615 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3342 resets) in 33 ms. (1176 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 460 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=153 )
Probabilistic random walk after 460 steps, saw 240 distinct states, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=153 ) properties seen :1
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 180 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 84 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Support contains 3 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:37:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 13:37:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 13:37:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:37:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/103 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/200 variables, 103/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 4/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 200/200 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 3939 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/103 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 9/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/200 variables, 103/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 96/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 200/200 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 4492 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 8445ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8447ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8587 ms. Remains : 103/103 places, 97/97 transitions.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 167 edges and 103 vertex of which 101 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 98 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1339 resets) in 45 ms. (869 steps per ms) remains 1/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (1140 resets) in 30 ms. (1290 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-22 13:37:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 11/13 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 54/67 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/73 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/75 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 81/156 variables, 75/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 32/188 variables, 21/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 7/195 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 4/199 variables, 2/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 1/200 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 200/200 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 156 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 11/13 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 54/67 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/73 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/75 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 81/156 variables, 75/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 32/188 variables, 21/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 7/195 variables, 4/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 4/199 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 1/200 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 200/200 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 128 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 286ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 26 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 97/97 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 167 edges and 103 vertex of which 101 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 101 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 77 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 76 transition count 70
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 76 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 71 transition count 65
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 51 transition count 45
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 49 transition count 45
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 6 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 49 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 43 transition count 39
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 43 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 42 transition count 38
Applied a total of 127 rules in 6 ms. Remains 42 /103 variables (removed 61) and now considering 38/97 (removed 59) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 42/103 places, 38/97 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5193 resets) in 56 ms. (701 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3393 resets) in 39 ms. (1000 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 460 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=115 )
Probabilistic random walk after 460 steps, saw 240 distinct states, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=115 ) properties seen :1
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 171 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3339 reset in 82 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3320 reset in 92 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 87 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Support contains 3 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 97/97 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 167 edges and 103 vertex of which 102 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 102 transition count 96
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 102 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 102 transition count 98
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 98 transition count 94
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 98 transition count 94
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 98 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 97 transition count 96
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 97 transition count 96
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -7
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 97 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 95 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 95 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 64 rules in 20 ms. Remains 95 /103 variables (removed 8) and now considering 99/97 (removed -2) transitions.
[2024-05-22 13:37:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 98 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 95 cols
[2024-05-22 13:37:37] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 13:37:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/95 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 13:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 97 unsolved
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 99/194 variables, 95/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 4/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 194/194 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved in 1806 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 13/65 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 18/83 variables, 7/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 99/182 variables, 83/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 4/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 47/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 12/194 variables, 12/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
[2024-05-22 13:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 194/194 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved in 3130 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/98 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 4950ms problems are : Problem set: 51 solved, 47 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 51 dead transitions in 4952ms
Found 51 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 51 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 51 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/103 places, 48/97 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 144 edges and 95 vertex of which 53 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 42 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 42 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 4 ms. Remains 53 /95 variables (removed 42) and now considering 48/48 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 53/103 places, 48/97 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4986 ms. Remains : 53/103 places, 48/97 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin3338509319071362576
[2024-05-22 13:37:42] [INFO ] Built C files in 1ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin3338509319071362576
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3338509319071362576;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 195 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3338509319071362576;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 27 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin3338509319071362576;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased15986233075355618216.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 356 ms.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property DoubleExponent-PT-002-LTLFireability-12 finished in 17089 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 61369 ms.
BK_STOP 1716385062708
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DoubleExponent-PT-002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DoubleExponent-PT-002, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r136-tall-171631132900532"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DoubleExponent-PT-002.tgz
mv DoubleExponent-PT-002 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;