Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r136-tall-171631132500388.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r136-tall-171631132500388
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 452K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 19 07:08 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 19 15:46 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:41 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 22 14:41 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K Apr 12 01:57 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K Apr 12 01:57 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Apr 12 01:57 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K Apr 12 01:57 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:41 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:41 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716374501129

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-22 10:41:42] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-22 10:41:42] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-22 10:41:42] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 70 ms
[2024-05-22 10:41:42] [INFO ] Transformed 212 places.
[2024-05-22 10:41:42] [INFO ] Transformed 224 transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:41:42] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-22 10:41:42] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 212 places and 224 transitions and 582 arcs in 162 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 27 out of 212 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 224/224 transitions.
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 198 transition count 224
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 166 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 166 transition count 192
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 158 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 158 transition count 184
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 152 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 152 transition count 178
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 147 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 147 transition count 173
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 145 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 145 transition count 169
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 144 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 144 transition count 168
Applied a total of 122 rules in 74 ms. Remains 144 /212 variables (removed 68) and now considering 168/224 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 144 cols
[2024-05-22 10:41:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 16 ms
[2024-05-22 10:41:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 213 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:41:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:41:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 363 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 167 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:41:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/312 variables, 144/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 312/312 variables, and 160 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 5993 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 14/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 168/312 variables, 144/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 167/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 312/312 variables, and 327 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 5320 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 11426ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11443ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 144/212 places, 168/224 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11900 ms. Remains : 144/212 places, 168/224 transitions.
Support contains 27 out of 144 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-22 10:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-22 10:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-22 10:41:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
Support contains 26 out of 144 places (down from 27) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 5739 steps (22 resets) in 293 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 0/23 properties
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 26 stabilizing places and 26 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 279 edges and 144 vertex of which 142 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&X((F(p1)&&X(X(G(p2))))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 135 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 135 transition count 158
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 130 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 130 transition count 151
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 127 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 127 transition count 148
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 125 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 125 transition count 146
Applied a total of 38 rules in 14 ms. Remains 125 /144 variables (removed 19) and now considering 146/168 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 125 cols
[2024-05-22 10:41:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-22 10:41:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:41:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:41:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 145 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:41:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 146/271 variables, 125/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 14/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 271/271 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 4439 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 14/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 146/271 variables, 125/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 145/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 271/271 variables, and 286 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 4165 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 8664ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8666ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/144 places, 146/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8839 ms. Remains : 125/144 places, 146/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 382 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 437 steps with 3 reset in 8 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-00 finished in 9295 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((p0&&X(G(p1))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 135 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 135 transition count 158
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 130 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 130 transition count 151
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 126 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 126 transition count 146
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 123 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 123 transition count 143
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 122 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 122 transition count 142
Applied a total of 44 rules in 44 ms. Remains 122 /144 variables (removed 22) and now considering 142/168 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 142 rows 122 cols
[2024-05-22 10:42:04] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 10:42:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 359 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:42:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:42:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 441 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:42:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 142/264 variables, 122/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 15/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/264 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 264/264 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 4887 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 142/264 variables, 122/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 141/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/264 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 264/264 variables, and 280 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 4268 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 9196ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9201ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/144 places, 142/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9688 ms. Remains : 122/144 places, 142/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 150 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-01 finished in 9883 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 135 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 135 transition count 158
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 130 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 130 transition count 152
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 127 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 127 transition count 148
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 125 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 125 transition count 146
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 124 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 124 transition count 145
Applied a total of 40 rules in 23 ms. Remains 124 /144 variables (removed 20) and now considering 145/168 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 145 rows 124 cols
[2024-05-22 10:42:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 10:42:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 376 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:42:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:42:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 467 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 144 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:42:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 145/269 variables, 124/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 15/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/269 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 269/269 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved in 4695 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 144/144 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 145/269 variables, 124/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 144/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/269 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 269/269 variables, and 285 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved in 4133 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 144/144 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 8913ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8914ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/144 places, 145/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9405 ms. Remains : 124/144 places, 145/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 110 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 85 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-02 finished in 9543 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(p0) U (p1&&G(p0)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 135 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 135 transition count 158
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 129 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 129 transition count 150
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 125 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 125 transition count 145
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 122 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 122 transition count 142
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 121 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 121 transition count 141
Applied a total of 46 rules in 17 ms. Remains 121 /144 variables (removed 23) and now considering 141/168 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 141 rows 121 cols
[2024-05-22 10:42:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 10:42:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:42:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:42:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 275 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 355 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 140 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:42:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 141/262 variables, 121/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 11/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 262/262 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 4079 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 11/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 141/262 variables, 121/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 140/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/262 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 3961 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 8094ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8096ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/144 places, 141/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8468 ms. Remains : 121/144 places, 141/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 114 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-03
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-03 finished in 8595 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F(p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 135 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 135 transition count 158
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 129 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 129 transition count 150
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 125 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 125 transition count 145
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 122 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 122 transition count 142
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 121 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 121 transition count 141
Applied a total of 46 rules in 7 ms. Remains 121 /144 variables (removed 23) and now considering 141/168 (removed 27) transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:42:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:42:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:42:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:42:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 140 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:42:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 141/262 variables, 121/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 11/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 262/262 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 4170 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 11/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 141/262 variables, 121/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 140/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/262 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 3844 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 8061ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/144 places, 141/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8210 ms. Remains : 121/144 places, 141/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 105 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 311 steps with 1 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-04 finished in 8331 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 1 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 279 edges and 144 vertex of which 142 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 141 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 116 transition count 140
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 116 transition count 120
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 96 transition count 120
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 92 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 92 transition count 115
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 92 transition count 114
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 91 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 89 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 89 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 88 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 88 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 87 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 87 transition count 109
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 53 transition count 75
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 48 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 48 transition count 65
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 43 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 43 transition count 59
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 38 transition count 50
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 38 transition count 50
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 212 place count 33 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 33 transition count 44
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 222 place count 28 transition count 35
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 28 transition count 35
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 232 place count 23 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 23 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 22 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 22 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 22 transition count 27
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 22 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 20 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 22 edges and 18 vertex of which 15 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 15 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 11 transition count 18
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 8 transition count 15
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 8 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 6 transition count 11
Applied a total of 264 rules in 89 ms. Remains 6 /144 variables (removed 138) and now considering 11/168 (removed 157) transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:42:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 8 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 6 cols
[2024-05-22 10:42:40] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 8 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 18 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 7 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 8 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/11 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/13 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/13 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 13/14 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 135 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/11 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 7/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/13 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/13 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 13/14 variables, and 13 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 106 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 250ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 250ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 6/144 places, 11/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 424 ms. Remains : 6/144 places, 11/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-05 finished in 502 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(X(F(p0))))))'
Support contains 1 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 134 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 134 transition count 157
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 128 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 128 transition count 149
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 124 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 124 transition count 144
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 121 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 121 transition count 141
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 120 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 120 transition count 140
Applied a total of 48 rules in 10 ms. Remains 120 /144 variables (removed 24) and now considering 140/168 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 120 cols
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 247 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 139 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:42:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 140/260 variables, 120/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 15/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/260 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved in 4449 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 139/139 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 140/260 variables, 120/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 139/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 260/260 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved in 3771 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 139/139 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 8289ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8290ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/144 places, 140/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8549 ms. Remains : 120/144 places, 140/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 203 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 17623 reset in 207 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 17647 reset in 108 ms.
Computed a total of 23 stabilizing places and 23 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 241 edges and 120 vertex of which 119 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Computed a total of 23 stabilizing places and 23 stable transitions
Detected a total of 23/120 stabilizing places and 23/140 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 89 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 177 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 4 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (0 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 102 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 177 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 1 out of 120 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 140/140 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 120 /120 variables (removed 0) and now considering 140/140 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:42:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:42:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:42:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:42:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 139 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:42:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 140/260 variables, 120/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 15/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/260 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved in 3883 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 139/139 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 140/260 variables, 120/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 139/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 260/260 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved in 3885 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 139/139 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 7798ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7799ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7915 ms. Remains : 120/120 places, 140/140 transitions.
Computed a total of 23 stabilizing places and 23 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 241 edges and 120 vertex of which 119 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Computed a total of 23 stabilizing places and 23 stable transitions
Detected a total of 23/120 stabilizing places and 23/140 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 85 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 209 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 4 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (0 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 127 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 219 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 194 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 324 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 17633 reset in 69 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 17677 reset in 77 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 219 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 1 out of 120 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 140/140 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 241 edges and 120 vertex of which 119 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 119 transition count 139
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 119 transition count 139
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 119 transition count 139
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -7
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 119 transition count 146
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 116 transition count 143
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 116 transition count 143
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -30
Deduced a syphon composed of 67 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 116 transition count 173
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 110 transition count 161
Deduced a syphon composed of 67 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 110 transition count 161
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 92 transition count 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 92 transition count 131
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 74 transition count 101
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 74 transition count 101
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 68 transition count 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 68 transition count 95
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 56 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 56 transition count 77
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 221 place count 32 transition count 41
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 32 transition count 41
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 32 transition count 37
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 31 transition count 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 31 transition count 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 251 rules in 47 ms. Remains 31 /120 variables (removed 89) and now considering 36/140 (removed 104) transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:43:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 35 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:43:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 31 cols
[2024-05-22 10:43:00] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 10:43:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
[2024-05-22 10:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 33 unsolved
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 34/65 variables, 31/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 14/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/66 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 66/66 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved in 358 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/15 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/47 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 13/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 13/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 16/63 variables, 15/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 2/65 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/66 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 66/66 variables, and 63 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved in 238 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/35 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 605ms problems are : Problem set: 22 solved, 13 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 22 dead transitions in 605ms
Found 22 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 22 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 22 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/120 places, 14/140 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 33 edges and 31 vertex of which 13 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 18 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 18 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 13 /31 variables (removed 18) and now considering 14/14 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 13/120 places, 14/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 664 ms. Remains : 13/120 places, 14/140 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin2113645930875791757
[2024-05-22 10:43:01] [INFO ] Built C files in 17ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin2113645930875791757
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2113645930875791757;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 390 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2113645930875791757;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 49 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2113645930875791757;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased2832823441717928876.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 368 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-06 finished in 21049 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 279 edges and 144 vertex of which 142 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 141 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 117 transition count 141
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 117 transition count 120
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 96 transition count 120
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 92 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 92 transition count 114
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 89 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 89 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 88 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 88 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 87 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 87 transition count 108
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 55 transition count 76
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 51 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 51 transition count 68
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 47 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 47 transition count 64
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 193 place count 43 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 43 transition count 56
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 39 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 39 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 35 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 35 transition count 44
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 217 place count 31 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 31 transition count 40
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 30 transition count 40
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 224 place count 29 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 29 transition count 38
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 226 place count 28 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 28 transition count 36
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 27 transition count 35
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 27 transition count 35
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 230 place count 26 transition count 33
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 26 transition count 33
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 232 place count 25 transition count 32
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 25 transition count 32
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 24 transition count 30
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 24 transition count 30
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 236 place count 23 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 23 transition count 29
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 21 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 34 edges and 20 vertex of which 19 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 19 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 18 transition count 25
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 16 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 14 transition count 21
Applied a total of 249 rules in 25 ms. Remains 14 /144 variables (removed 130) and now considering 21/168 (removed 147) transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 18 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 14 cols
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 18 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 49 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 16 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 18 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/12 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 17/29 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/31 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/31 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 31/32 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved in 143 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/12 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 17/29 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 16/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/31 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/31 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 31/32 variables, and 31 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved in 125 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 274ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 274ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 14/144 places, 21/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 355 ms. Remains : 14/144 places, 21/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-07
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-07 finished in 407 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 279 edges and 144 vertex of which 142 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 141 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 117 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 116 transition count 140
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 116 transition count 120
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 96 transition count 120
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 92 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 92 transition count 115
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 92 transition count 114
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 91 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 89 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 89 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 88 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 88 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 87 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 87 transition count 109
Performed 33 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 54 transition count 76
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 180 place count 49 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 49 transition count 66
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 190 place count 44 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 44 transition count 60
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 40 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 40 transition count 53
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 36 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 36 transition count 48
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 215 place count 32 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 32 transition count 41
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 223 place count 28 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 28 transition count 36
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 27 transition count 35
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 27 transition count 35
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 27 transition count 34
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 27 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 25 transition count 32
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 28 edges and 23 vertex of which 20 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 20 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 16 transition count 25
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 12 transition count 21
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 12 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 9 transition count 15
Applied a total of 258 rules in 19 ms. Remains 9 /144 variables (removed 135) and now considering 15/168 (removed 153) transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 11 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 9 cols
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 11 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 44 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 11 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-22 10:43:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 10/16 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/19 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/19 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 19/20 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 51 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 9/9 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 10/16 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 9/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/19 variables, 3/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/19 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 19/20 variables, and 18 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 54 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 9/9 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 108ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 108ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 9/144 places, 15/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 176 ms. Remains : 9/144 places, 15/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 121 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-09 finished in 316 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G((p0||X(F(p1))))&&X(p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 135 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 135 transition count 158
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 129 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 129 transition count 150
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 125 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 125 transition count 145
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 122 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 122 transition count 142
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 121 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 121 transition count 141
Applied a total of 46 rules in 6 ms. Remains 121 /144 variables (removed 23) and now considering 141/168 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 141 rows 121 cols
[2024-05-22 10:43:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 10:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:43:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 140 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:43:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 141/262 variables, 121/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 10/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 262/262 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 3884 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 141/262 variables, 121/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 140/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/262 variables, and 273 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 3545 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 7459ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7464ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/144 places, 141/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7601 ms. Remains : 121/144 places, 141/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 212 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 65 steps with 1 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-10 finished in 7825 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((X(X(X(X(p0))))||(p1&&G(F(p2)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 135 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 135 transition count 158
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 129 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 129 transition count 150
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 125 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 125 transition count 145
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 122 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 122 transition count 142
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 121 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 121 transition count 141
Applied a total of 46 rules in 13 ms. Remains 121 /144 variables (removed 23) and now considering 141/168 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 141 rows 121 cols
[2024-05-22 10:43:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 10:43:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:43:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:43:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 140 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:43:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 141/262 variables, 121/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 15/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 262/262 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 4135 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 141/262 variables, 121/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 140/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/262 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved in 3736 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 7905ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 140 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7907ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/144 places, 141/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8050 ms. Remains : 121/144 places, 141/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 501 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-11
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 192 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-11 finished in 8575 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 279 edges and 144 vertex of which 142 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 141 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 116 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 115 transition count 139
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 115 transition count 119
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 95 transition count 119
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 90 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 90 transition count 112
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 90 transition count 111
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 89 transition count 111
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 86 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 86 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 85 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 85 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 84 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 84 transition count 105
Performed 33 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 51 transition count 72
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 45 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 45 transition count 60
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 39 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 39 transition count 53
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 210 place count 34 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 34 transition count 44
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 29 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 29 transition count 38
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 230 place count 24 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 24 transition count 29
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 240 place count 19 transition count 23
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 19 transition count 23
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 18 transition count 22
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 18 transition count 22
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 18 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 16 transition count 19
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 16 edges and 14 vertex of which 11 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 11 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 9 transition count 14
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 7 transition count 12
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 7 transition count 10
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 5 transition count 8
Applied a total of 265 rules in 23 ms. Remains 5 /144 variables (removed 139) and now considering 8/168 (removed 160) transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 6 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 5 cols
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 15 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 6 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 40 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 4 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 6 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/8 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/10 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 10/11 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 32 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/8 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/10 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 10/11 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 38 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 73ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 73ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 5/144 places, 8/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 142 ms. Remains : 5/144 places, 8/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-12
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 11 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-12 finished in 194 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X((p0&&F(p1))) U G((G(p2) U p3)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 144 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 144/144 places, 168/168 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 136 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 136 transition count 160
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 131 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 131 transition count 153
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 128 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 128 transition count 149
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 125 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 125 transition count 146
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 124 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 124 transition count 145
Applied a total of 40 rules in 11 ms. Remains 124 /144 variables (removed 20) and now considering 145/168 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 145 rows 124 cols
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 144 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:43:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 145/269 variables, 124/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 10:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 13/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/269 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 269/269 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved in 4124 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 144/144 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 145/269 variables, 124/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 144/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/269 variables, 0/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 269/269 variables, and 283 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved in 4022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 144/144 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 8178ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8180ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/144 places, 145/168 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8327 ms. Remains : 124/144 places, 145/168 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 901 ms :[(NOT p3), (NOT p3), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), true, (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND p0 (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3) p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-14
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b-LTLFireability-14 finished in 9264 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 106755 ms.

BK_STOP 1716374609042

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r136-tall-171631132500388"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b.tgz
mv DiscoveryGPU-PT-07b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;