Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r136-tall-171631131900106.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is Dekker-PT-050, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r136-tall-171631131900106
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 2.1M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 19 07:08 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 19 15:45 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K Apr 22 14:39 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 22 14:39 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 11 21:00 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 149K Apr 11 21:00 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 11 20:52 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 121K Apr 11 20:52 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:39 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 22 14:39 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5M May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716336123155

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Dekker-PT-050
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-22 00:02:04] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-22 00:02:04] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-22 00:02:04] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 195 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:04] [INFO ] Transformed 250 places.
[2024-05-22 00:02:04] [INFO ] Transformed 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:02:04] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-22 00:02:04] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 250 places and 2600 transitions and 20100 arcs in 310 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 137 out of 250 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 34 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:02:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 250 cols
[2024-05-22 00:02:04] [INFO ] Computed 150 invariants in 24 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 386 ms returned [100, 103, 106, 109, 112, 115, 118, 121, 124, 127, 130, 133, 136, 139, 142, 145, 148, 151, 154, 157, 160, 166, 169, 172, 175, 178, 181, 184, 187, 190, 193, 196, 199, 202, 205, 208, 211, 214, 217, 220, 223, 226, 229, 232, 235, 238, 241, 244, 247]
Discarding 49 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 425 ms to find 49 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 201/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 495 ms. Remains : 201/250 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Support contains 137 out of 201 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-22 00:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 236 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 159 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2069 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 4/70 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 284 ms. (140 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 189 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 188 ms. (211 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 147 ms. (270 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
[2024-05-22 00:02:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 201 cols
[2024-05-22 00:02:07] [INFO ] Computed 101 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/401 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 68 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/201 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/100 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 175ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-22 00:02:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 110 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 117 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 42 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:02:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:02:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:02:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 415 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 00:02:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:02:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:02:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 00:02:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 531 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 949 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 2550 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:02:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:02:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:02:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 200/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 99/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
[2024-05-22 00:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 200/401 variables, and 380 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved in 30063 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 200/201 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 99/100 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2550/2550 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 200/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 99/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 80/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 20/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
[2024-05-22 00:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 3/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 1)
(s2 0)
(s3 1)
(s4 0)
(s5 1)
(s6 0)
(s7 1)
(s8 0)
(s9 1)
(s10 0)
(s11 1)
(s12 0)
(s13 1)
(s14 0)
(s15 1)
(s16 0)
(s17 1)
(s18 0)
(s19 1)
(s20 0)
(s21 1)
(s22 0)
(s23 1)
(s24 0)
(s25 1)
(s26 0)
(s27 1)
(s28 0)
(s29 1)
(s30 0)
(s31 1)
(s32 0)
(s33 1)
(s34 0)
(s35 1)
(s36 0)
(s37 1)
(s38 0)
(s39 1)
(s40 0)
(s41 1)
(s42 0)
(s43 1)
(s44 0)
(s45 1)
(s46 0)
(s47 1)
(s48 0)
(s49 1)
(s50 0)
(s51 1)
(s52 0)
(s53 1)
(s54 0)
(s55 1)
(s56 0)
(s57 1)
(s58 0)
(s59 1)
(s60 0)
(s61 1)
(s62 0)
(s63 1)
(s64 0)
(s65 1)
(s66 0)
(s67 1)
(s68 0)
(s69 1)
(s70 0)
(s71 1)
(s72 0)
(s73 1)
(s74 0)
(s75 1)
(s76 1)
(s77 0)
(s78 1)
(s79 0)
(s80 1)
(s81 0)
(s82 1)
(s83 0)
(s84 1)
(s85 0)
(s86 1)
(s87 0)
(s88 1)
(s89 0)
(s90 1)
(s91 0)
(s92 1)
(s93 0)
(s94 1)
(s95 0)
(s96 1)
(s97 0)
(s98 1)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 1)
(s102 1)
(s103 0)
(s104 1)
(s105 0)
(s106 1)
(s107 0)
(s108 1)
(s109 0)
(s110 1)
(s111 0)
(s112 1)
(s113 0)
(s114 1)
(s115 0)
(s116 1)
(s117 0)
(s118 1)
(s119 0)
(s120 1)
(s121 0)
(s122 1)
(s123 0)
(s124 1)
(s125 0)
(s126 1)
(s127 0)
(s128 1)
(s129 0)
(s130 1)
(s131 0)
(s132 1)
(s133 0)
(s134 1)
(s135 0)
(s136 1)
(s137 0)
(s138 1)
(s139 0)
(s140 1)
(s141 0)
(s143 1)
(s144 0)
(s145 1)
(s146 0)
(s147 1)
(s148 0)
(s149 1)
(s150 0)
(s151 1)
(s152 0)
(s153 1)
(s154 0)
(s155 1)
(s156 0)
(s157 1)
(s158 0)
(s159 1)
(s160 0)
(s161 1)
(s162 0)
(s163 1)
(s164 0)
(s165 1)
(s166 0)
(s167 1)
(s168 0)
(s169 1)
(s170 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 200/401 variables, and 443 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved in 30042 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 200/201 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 99/100 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/2550 constraints, Known Traps: 143/143 constraints]
After SMT, in 62482ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2550 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 62521ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 63532 ms. Remains : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 96 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 91 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 88 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 89 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11600506887326950618.gal : 49 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6609782486504939026.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11600506887326950618.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6609782486504939026.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.756301,35644,2,646,5,46945,6,0,3407,14960,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((E((((flag_1_19==1)&&(flag_1_33==1))&&(p1_19==1)) U !((((flag_1_24==1)&&(flag_1_40==1))&&(p1_40==1)))) + E(((!(((flag_1_22==1)&&(fl...315
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((E((((flag_1_19==1)&&(flag_1_33==1))&&(p1_19==1)) U !((((flag_1_24==1)&&(flag_1_40==1)...372
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,0,6.05894,180280,1,0,5289,1.18457e+06,5231,2626,35464,595667,5256
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:03:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:03:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 414 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 420 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 452 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 94 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 86 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11261442142607919497.gal : 15 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1698126677767829071.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11261442142607919497.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1698126677767829071.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.733956,35680,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(AG((!((((flag_1_5==1)&&(flag_1_47==1))&&(p1_47==1))) + !(AF((((flag_1_37==1)&&(flag_1_43==1))&&(p1_43==1)))))) U (EX(AF((((flag_1_47=...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!((((flag_1_5==1)&&(flag_1_47==1))&&(p1_47==1))) + !(!(EG(!((((flag_1_37==1)&&(fla...343
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,1,5.67017,157640,1,0,5275,1.04282e+06,5242,2615,35563,511879,5235
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:03:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:03:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 424 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 432 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 458 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 73 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10960417721652371189.gal : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4225080659555111398.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10960417721652371189.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4225080659555111398.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.760215,35676,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AX(!((((flag_1_14==1)&&(flag_1_43==1))&&(p1_43==1)))) U !((!((((flag_1_3==1)&&(flag_1_10==1))&&(p1_3==1))) + !(EX(AG((((flag_1_4==1)&&(...188
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,!(EX(!(!((((flag_1_14==1)&&(flag_1_43==1))&&(p1_43==1))))))) * !(!((((flag_1_3==1)&&(flag_1_10==...249
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,0,4.99251,150968,1,0,5260,1.01783e+06,5222,2602,35280,490311,5210
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:03:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:03:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 407 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 411 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 442 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 73 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 77 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 81 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18259529540807598943.gal : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14389194089090643715.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18259529540807598943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14389194089090643715.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.743301,35676,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(EF((((flag_1_12==1)&&(flag_1_34==1))&&(p1_12==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(E(TRUE U (((flag_1_12==1)&&(flag_1_34==1))&&(p1_12==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,1,5.26887,150772,1,0,5260,1.02146e+06,5221,2604,35373,492582,5215
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 161 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:03:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:03:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 359 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 362 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 94 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 621 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 79 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 88 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 88 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11894621028161890785.gal : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1754363885772943772.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11894621028161890785.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1754363885772943772.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.738828,35672,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((EG(!((((flag_1_6==1)&&(flag_1_41==1))&&(p1_41==1)))) * ((((flag_1_29==1)&&(flag_1_46==1))&&(p1_46==1)) + (!((((flag_1_9==1)&&(flag_1...393
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(EG(!((((flag_1_6==1)&&(flag_1_41==1))&&(p1_41==1)))) * ((((flag_1_29==1)&&(flag_1_46==1))&&(p1_...445
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 00:04:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 00:04:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 77 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1795875746626494604.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1795875746626494604.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1795875746626494604.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1795875746626494604.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1795875746626494604.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 00:04:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 00:04:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 00:04:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 7200 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 259 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 52 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:04:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18212642829496570918.gal : 16 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6950331857366552862.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18212642829496570918.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6950331857366552862.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.382527,11288,103,10,1473,1350,2815,1150,26,1325,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((EG(!((((u6.flag_1_6==1)&&(u41.flag_1_41==1))&&(u41.p1_41==1)))) * ((((u29.flag_1_29==1)&&(u46.flag_1_46==1))&&(u46.p1_46==1)) + (!((...471
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(EG(!((((u6.flag_1_6==1)&&(u41.flag_1_41==1))&&(u41.p1_41==1)))) * ((((u29.flag_1_29==1)&&(u46.f...523
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t51, u1.t103, u2.t155, u3.t207, u4.t259, u5.t311, u6.t363, u7.t415, u8.t467, u9.t519, u10....684
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
(forward)formula 0,0,2.73346,104736,1,0,257912,1350,18816,253610,170,1325,348675
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:04:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:04:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 386 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 389 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 413 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 72 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 79 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 79 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 80 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2703518761808054423.gal : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12325532336301169406.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2703518761808054423.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12325532336301169406.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.687844,35700,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(!(EX((((flag_1_43==1)&&(flag_1_49==1))&&(p1_43==1))))) U !((EG(!(((((flag_1_12==1)&&(flag_1_29==1))&&((p1_12==1)&&(flag_1_24==1)))&&...240
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX((((flag_1_43==1)&&(flag_1_49==1))&&(p1_43==1)))))) * !(EG(!(((((flag_1_12==1)&&(flag_...391
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,1,5.26732,156800,1,0,5268,1.03826e+06,5230,2611,35841,507415,5228
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:04:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:04:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 407 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 412 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 441 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 73 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 84 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 88 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9174017458015029347.gal : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11882041941170904797.ctl : 73 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9174017458015029347.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11882041941170904797.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.713942,35708,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX((EG(EX((((flag_1_2==0)||(flag_1_43==0))||(p1_2==0)))) + (AX((((flag_1_3==1)&&(flag_1_47==1))&&(p1_3==1))) * (((flag_1_1==0)||(flag_...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((EY(EY(Init)) * !(EG(EX((((flag_1_2==0)||(flag_1_43==0))||(p1_2==0))))))) * !((((flag_1_3==1)&&(flag_1_47=...320
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,1,4.90692,151068,1,0,5266,1.00316e+06,5226,2608,35342,496427,5216
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:04:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:04:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 313 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 319 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 341 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 89 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13304656216604987316.gal : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8544823138687323235.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13304656216604987316.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8544823138687323235.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.680804,35708,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((EX((((flag_1_15==1)&&(flag_1_17==1))&&(p1_17==1))) + EG((((flag_1_17==0)||(flag_1_18==0))||(p1_17==0)))) + (EX(((E((((flag_1_2==1...1384
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((EX((((flag_1_15==1)&&(flag_1_17==1))&&(p1_17==1))) + EG((((flag_1_17==0)||(flag_1...2060
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,1,6.39851,210492,1,0,5321,1.32559e+06,5248,2647,35513,679688,5304
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:04:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:04:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 399 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 401 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 426 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 77 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 79 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14229589694344642931.gal : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15436619521343363869.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14229589694344642931.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15436619521343363869.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.681771,35700,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(AF(!(E((((flag_1_12==1)&&(flag_1_34==1))&&(p1_12==1)) U (((flag_1_0==1)&&(flag_1_2==1))&&(p1_0==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(!(E((((flag_1_12==1)&&(flag_1_34==1))&&(p1_12==1)) U (((flag_1_0==1)&&(flag_1_2...191
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,5.43977,170656,1,0,5276,1.13303e+06,5233,2615,35729,563159,5240
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:04:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:04:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 399 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 403 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 429 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 66 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15977252959044239987.gal : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4762451417381046481.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15977252959044239987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4762451417381046481.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.759301,35704,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(AG(EF(((((flag_1_5==1)&&(flag_1_27==1))&&(p1_27==1))||(((flag_1_22==1)&&(flag_1_44==1))&&(p1_44==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((((flag_1_5==1)&&(flag_1_27==1))&&(p1_27==1))||(((flag_1_22==1)&&(fla...198
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,1,5.41012,151064,1,0,5261,1.01327e+06,5221,2603,35434,488262,5211
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:04:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:04:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 347 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 349 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 376 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 73 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 78 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 78 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 78 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6390715101423694821.gal : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability259506563246747187.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6390715101423694821.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability259506563246747187.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.705057,35704,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(E(!(AX((((flag_1_3==1)&&(flag_1_44==1))&&(p1_44==1)))) U EG((((flag_1_16==1)&&(flag_1_17==1))&&(p1_17==1)))) U (!((!(AF((((flag_1_10...509
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(E(!(!(EX(!((((flag_1_3==1)&&(flag_1_44==1))&&(p1_44==1)))))) U EG((((flag_1_16==1)&&(fla...581
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,1,6.33559,190332,1,0,5295,1.22384e+06,5247,2630,35577,623158,5271
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:04:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:04:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 366 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 368 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 397 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 73 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 73 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 73 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8391823469903226310.gal : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3378380890937585823.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8391823469903226310.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3378380890937585823.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.690138,35704,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(EG(!((((flag_1_29==1)&&(flag_1_32==1))&&(p1_29==1)))) U (E((((flag_1_26==1)&&(flag_1_40==1))&&(p1_26==1)) U (((flag_1_24==1)&&(flag_...231
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(EG(!((((flag_1_29==1)&&(flag_1_32==1))&&(p1_29==1)))) U (E((((flag_1_26==1)&&(flag_1_40==1))&&(p1...282
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,0,5.09,154496,1,0,5263,1.02901e+06,5232,2607,35641,503865,5219
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:04:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:04:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 370 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 373 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 391 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 86 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 74 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17481891953350494334.gal : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6600116893000431873.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17481891953350494334.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6600116893000431873.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.682193,35696,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AX(AG(EF((((flag_1_16==0)||(flag_1_36==0))||(p1_36==0))))) * AG((((((flag_1_30==0)||(flag_1_42==0))||(p1_42==0))&&(((flag_1_17==0)||(...285
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (((flag_1_16==0)||(flag_1_36==0))||(p1_36==0)))))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !...366
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,0,4.46328,151056,1,0,5260,1.02454e+06,5222,2602,35315,492253,5210
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:05:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:05:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:05:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 311 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 314 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 342 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:05:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 80 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:05:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 72 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 74 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2474946245846306884.gal : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11643732605441922870.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2474946245846306884.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11643732605441922870.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.671872,35700,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E((E(!((((((((flag_0_0==1)&&(flag_0_1==1))&&((flag_0_2==1)&&(flag_0_3==1)))&&(((flag_0_4==1)&&(flag_0_5==1))&&((flag_0_6==1)&&(flag_0_...1271
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E((E(!((((((((flag_0_0==1)&&(flag_0_1==1))&&((flag_0_2==1)&&(flag_0_3==1)))&&(((flag_0_4==1)&&(fl...1469
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,1,5.79091,179912,1,0,5292,1.1721e+06,5253,2633,35723,584356,5280
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:05:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 2400 similar events)
[2024-05-22 00:05:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:05:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 334 ms returned [142]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 336 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2600/2600 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 354 ms. Remains : 200/201 places, 2600/2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:05:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 66 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 2600 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:05:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 70 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 72 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3268633187322869999.gal : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2854642248861426987.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3268633187322869999.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2854642248861426987.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.692083,35704,2,642,5,46701,6,0,3403,14896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((A((((flag_1_0==1)&&(flag_1_10==1))&&(p1_0==1)) U (((flag_1_6==1)&&(flag_1_12==1))&&(p1_12==1))) * (EF((((flag_1_6==1)&&(flag_1_17...493
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((!((E(!((((flag_1_6==1)&&(flag_1_12==1))&&(p1_12==1))) U (!((((flag_1_0==1)&&(...1106
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t103, t155, t207, t259, t311, t363, t415, t467, t519, t571, t623, t675, t727, t779, t831...494
(forward)formula 0,1,4.77744,154760,1,0,5266,1.03015e+06,5229,2607,35361,509826,5216
FORMULA Dekker-PT-050-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-22 00:05:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 78 ms
Total runtime 190986 ms.

BK_STOP 1716336315289

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Dekker-PT-050"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Dekker-PT-050, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r136-tall-171631131900106"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Dekker-PT-050.tgz
mv Dekker-PT-050 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;