Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r136-tall-171631131800042.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r136-tall-171631131800042
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 464K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 17:56 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K Apr 11 17:56 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K Apr 11 17:56 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K Apr 11 17:56 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K Apr 22 14:39 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Apr 22 14:39 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 22 14:39 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Apr 22 14:39 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 17:57 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K Apr 11 17:57 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 11 17:57 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K Apr 11 17:57 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:39 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K Apr 22 14:39 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716330359179

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 40 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Transformed 38 places.
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 38 places and 32 transitions and 88 arcs in 143 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 21 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Reduced 2 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Reduced 2 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Reduced 2 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Reduced 2 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Reduced 2 identical enabling conditions.
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 38 out of 38 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 38 /38 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 38 cols
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 152 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 253 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 32/70 variables, 38/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/70 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 70/70 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 560 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 38/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 32/70 variables, 38/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 28/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/70 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 70/70 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 341 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 38/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 928ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 938ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1218 ms. Remains : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 38 out of 38 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 47 to 37
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1211 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 4/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 316 ms. (126 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 141 ms. (281 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 125 ms. (317 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2024-05-21 22:26:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp35 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 11/31 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 11/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 38/70 variables, and 41 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 0 unsolved in 40 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 52ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-21 22:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 38 /38 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 32/70 variables, 38/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/70 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 70/70 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 386 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 38/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 32/70 variables, 38/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 28/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/70 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 70/70 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 304 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 38/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 700ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 700ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 795 ms. Remains : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1274588825056255522.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8071272551782388664.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1274588825056255522.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8071272551782388664.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,153,0.019011,3412,2,254,5,916,6,0,187,609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((EF(((((Active_2_2==1)&&(Acknowledge_1_2==1))||((Acknowledge_2_2==1)&&(Active_1_2==1)))||(((Acknowledge_2_1==1)&&(Active_1_1==1))||((...1127
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!((E(TRUE U ((((Active_2_2==1)&&(Acknowledge_1_2==1))||((Acknowledge_2_2==1)&&(Active_1_2==1)))||((...1990
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.055228,4816,1,0,32,7161,33,23,950,5599,46
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 34 transition count 32
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 34 /38 variables (removed 4) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned [3, 30]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 49 ms. Remains : 32/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17763754975179133246.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15828178047301875648.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17763754975179133246.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15828178047301875648.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,153,0.009967,3484,2,106,5,442,6,0,163,300,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(AX(A(A(((((WaitMutex_1_2==1)&&(Mutex_2==1))||((WaitMutex_2_2==1)&&(Mutex_2==1)))||(((WaitMutex_1_1==1)&&(Mutex_1==1))||((Mutex_1==1)...496
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EG((((Modify_2_2==1)||(Modify_2_1==1))||((Modify_1_1==1)||(Modify_1_2==1)))))) * !(!(...1274
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.024101,4064,1,0,11,4217,22,4,688,3259,10
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 38 /38 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 38 cols
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 32/70 variables, 38/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/70 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 70/70 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 375 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 38/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 32/70 variables, 38/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 28/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/70 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 70/70 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 316 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 38/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 696ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 697ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 779 ms. Remains : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13444551288077805492.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15917295132723669968.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13444551288077805492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15917295132723669968.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,153,0.006737,3528,2,254,5,916,6,0,187,609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((((updating_2_1==0)&&(updating_1_1==0))&&((updating_1_2==0)&&(updating_2_2==0)))) * A(((((RecBuff_1_2==1)&&(all_passive_1==1))||((all...721
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((((updating_2_1==0)&&(updating_1_1==0))&&((updating_1_2==0)&&(updating_2_2==0)))))] = FAL...1718
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.032238,5164,1,0,14,6161,36,7,892,2856,12
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 38 /38 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 22:26:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 32/70 variables, 38/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/70 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 70/70 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 374 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 38/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 32/70 variables, 38/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 28/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/70 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 70/70 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 316 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 38/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 702ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 702ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 763 ms. Remains : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8925736561614592736.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12695589961722695780.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8925736561614592736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12695589961722695780.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,153,0.007192,3528,2,254,5,916,6,0,187,609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((((Message_1_1==1)||(Message_2_1==1))||((Message_2_2==1)||(Message_1_2==1)))) + (A(!(((((A(((((WaitMutex_1_2==1)&&(Mutex_2==1))||((Wa...1431
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((Message_1_1==1)||(Message_2_1==1))||((Message_2_2==1)||(Message_1_2==1))))] != FALSE + [...5104
(forward)formula 0,1,0.008334,3844,1,0,7,916,8,1,199,609,1
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 38 /38 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned [3, 34]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 30 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 36 /36 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31 ms. Remains : 36/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2553329599939199818.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16237689248224291783.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2553329599939199818.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16237689248224291783.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,153,0.005135,3508,2,114,5,440,6,0,179,295,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AX(EG(((all_active_1==1)||(all_active_2==1))))) * EG(EF((AG(EX((((MesBuffReply_2_2==1)||(MesBuffReply_2_1==1))||((MesBuffReply_1_1==1...542
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(EG(((all_active_1==1)||(all_active_2==1)))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EG(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !...994
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 24/0/8
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 20/24/12
(forward)formula 0,0,0.040936,5408,1,0,16,9496,37,6,995,5949,15
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 34 transition count 32
Applied a total of 4 rules in 0 ms. Remains 34 /38 variables (removed 4) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned [3, 30]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 24 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 25 ms. Remains : 32/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9384646305678360603.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17815950019418192226.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9384646305678360603.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17815950019418192226.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,153,0.004734,3480,2,106,5,442,6,0,163,300,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((E(((((WaitMutex_1_2==1)&&(Mutex_2==1))||((WaitMutex_2_2==1)&&(Mutex_2==1)))||(((WaitMutex_1_1==1)&&(Mutex_1==1))||((Mutex_1==1)&&...408
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((E(((((WaitMutex_1_2==1)&&(Mutex_2==1))||((WaitMutex_2_2==1)&&(Mutex_2==1)))||(((WaitM...468
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 20/0/12
(forward)formula 0,1,0.018314,4324,1,0,10,3596,23,2,768,1997,10
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 34 transition count 32
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 34 /38 variables (removed 4) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned [3, 30]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 28 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 30 ms. Remains : 32/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability129030543366984704.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16687496751315732564.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability129030543366984704.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16687496751315732564.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,153,0.004713,3484,2,106,5,442,6,0,163,300,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(A(!(EF((((updating_2_1==1)||(updating_1_1==1))||((updating_1_2==1)||(updating_2_2==1))))) U !(AX((((Message_1_1==1)||(Message_2_1==...596
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(!(!(EX(!((((Message_1_1==1)||(Message_2_1==1))||((Message_2_2==1)||(Message_1_2==...1229
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.032129,4856,1,0,23,6515,35,12,835,4389,22
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 34 transition count 32
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 34 /38 variables (removed 4) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned [3, 30]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 40 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 43 ms. Remains : 32/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7206360568942842915.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8699275526975107676.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7206360568942842915.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8699275526975107676.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,153,0.007051,3484,2,106,5,442,6,0,163,300,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG((EF((all_active_2==0)) * AF((updating_1_2==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (all_active_2==0))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),!((updating_1_2==0...168
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 30/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.013731,3800,1,0,7,1984,21,0,752,789,11
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 35 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 23 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 20 transition count 17
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 19 transition count 17
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 19 transition count 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 18 transition count 16
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 17 transition count 15
Applied a total of 38 rules in 22 ms. Remains 17 /38 variables (removed 21) and now considering 15/32 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 15 rows 17 cols
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned [2]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 24 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 16/38 places, 15/32 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 16 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 6 edges and 13 vertex of which 4 / 13 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 11 transition count 13
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 11 transition count 11
Applied a total of 8 rules in 8 ms. Remains 11 /16 variables (removed 5) and now considering 11/15 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 10 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 11 cols
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 10 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 21 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 43 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 11/38 places, 11/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 97 ms. Remains : 11/38 places, 11/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 11 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14367798343037985894.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1934526110928832808.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14367798343037985894.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1934526110928832808.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,14,0.002498,3352,2,30,5,113,6,0,56,76,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AG((EG((MesBuffReply_2_1==1)) * ((Acknowledge_1_1==0)||(Active_2_1==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((EG((MesBuffReply_2_1==1)) * ((Acknowledge_1_1==0)||(Active_2_1==0))...171
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.00509,3568,1,0,9,298,23,2,257,198,9
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 35 transition count 32
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 35 /38 variables (removed 3) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 35 cols
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned [3]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 24 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 34/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 26 ms. Remains : 34/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7196208560597306850.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4128902119956006893.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7196208560597306850.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4128902119956006893.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,153,0.005152,3500,2,135,5,516,6,0,171,348,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((AF((all_active_2!=1)) * A((EF((Modify_1_1==1)) + (MesBuffReply_1_1==1)) U (EX(((Acknowledge_2_2==1)&&(Active_1_2==1))) * EG((Message...432
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(((Mutex_1==1)&&(WaitMutex_2_1==1)))))) * !(E(!(((Mutex_1==1)&&(WaitMutex_2_1==1))) U (!(((!(EG...1692
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 27/0/5
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 30/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.028513,4872,1,0,26,5583,56,10,917,3116,30
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 34 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 22 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 14 transition count 12
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 12 transition count 12
Applied a total of 46 rules in 3 ms. Remains 12 /38 variables (removed 26) and now considering 12/32 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 12 cols
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 50 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 8 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/12 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/24 variables, 12/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 24/24 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 64 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 12/12 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/12 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/24 variables, 12/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 8/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 24/24 variables, and 36 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 79 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 12/12 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 145ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 145ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 12/38 places, 12/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 203 ms. Remains : 12/38 places, 12/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3255428509868633491.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2847023571926061640.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3255428509868633491.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2847023571926061640.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,22,0.003896,3364,2,40,5,152,6,0,63,100,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(((AF((all_active_2==1)) * (WaitMutex_2_2==1)) * (Mutex_2==1)) U !(EF((Modify_2_2==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((!(EG(!((all_active_2==1)))) * (WaitMutex_2_2==1)) * (Mutex_2==1)) U !(E(TRUE U (Modify...177
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.008173,3680,1,0,11,577,29,2,288,352,11
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 36 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 26 transition count 19
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 22 transition count 19
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 22 transition count 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 20 transition count 17
Applied a total of 33 rules in 4 ms. Remains 20 /38 variables (removed 18) and now considering 17/32 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 17 rows 20 cols
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned [17]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 31 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/38 places, 17/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 19 transition count 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 17 transition count 15
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 17 /19 variables (removed 2) and now considering 15/17 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 15 rows 17 cols
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 52 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 17/38 places, 15/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 89 ms. Remains : 17/38 places, 15/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 15 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9898493788999493572.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12226263692146006458.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9898493788999493572.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12226263692146006458.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,30,0.004864,3392,2,44,5,181,6,0,86,125,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(((MesBuffReply_1_1==0) * EF(!(E(((Active_2_2==1)&&(Acknowledge_1_2==1)) U ((Acknowledge_1_1==1)&&(Active_2_1==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(((MesBuffReply_1_1==0) * E(TRUE U !(E(((Active_2_2==1)&&(Acknowledge_1_2==1)) U ((Acknow...204
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 12/2/3
(forward)formula 0,0,0.011718,3972,1,0,10,608,28,3,410,397,13
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 35 transition count 32
Applied a total of 3 rules in 0 ms. Remains 35 /38 variables (removed 3) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 35 cols
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned [3, 31]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 33 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 33 /33 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 34 ms. Remains : 33/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11356707675462384628.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5610056063903719111.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11356707675462384628.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5610056063903719111.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,153,0.007598,3492,2,109,5,448,6,0,167,302,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(AG(AF(AX((all_active_2==0))))) * E(!((!(AX((Message_1_1!=1))) * (updating_1_2==1))) U EX(AF(((Acknowledge_2_1==1)&&(Active_1_1==1))))...157
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((Init * EX(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((all_active_2==0)))))))))))),!((!(!(EX(!((Message_1_1!=1))))) * ...239
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.021427,4600,1,0,14,4591,33,2,821,2220,14
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 35 transition count 32
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 35 /38 variables (removed 3) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned [3, 31]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 35 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 33 /33 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 38 ms. Remains : 33/38 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11715447141806131858.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13475977966252488430.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11715447141806131858.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13475977966252488430.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,153,0.007659,3492,2,109,5,448,6,0,167,302,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(!(E(A((updating_1_1==1) U ((Acknowledge_2_1==1)&&(Active_1_1==1))) U (all_active_1==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(E(!((E(!(((Acknowledge_2_1==1)&&(Active_1_1==1))) U (!((updating_1_1==1)) * !(((Ackn...278
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 29/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,0.021328,4336,1,0,13,4410,32,6,818,2366,17
FORMULA DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 22:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 6398 ms.

BK_STOP 1716330366780

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r136-tall-171631131800042"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02.tgz
mv DatabaseWithMutex-PT-02 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;