Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r092-tall-171624189800697.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-30a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189800697
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Apr 22 14:37 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 22 14:37 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:37 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 22 14:37 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 12 08:40 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 130K Apr 12 08:40 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K Apr 12 08:38 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Apr 12 08:38 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K Apr 22 14:37 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 22 14:37 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716348931173

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-30a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-22 03:35:32] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-22 03:35:32] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-22 03:35:32] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 72 ms
[2024-05-22 03:35:32] [INFO ] Transformed 234 places.
[2024-05-22 03:35:32] [INFO ] Transformed 191 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:35:32] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-22 03:35:32] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 234 places and 191 transitions and 926 arcs in 175 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 14 transitions.
Support contains 84 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 177/177 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 233 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 233 transition count 176
Applied a total of 2 rules in 33 ms. Remains 233 /234 variables (removed 1) and now considering 176/177 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 233 cols
[2024-05-22 03:35:32] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 27 ms
[2024-05-22 03:35:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 316 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 03:35:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:35:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 03:35:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 308 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 651 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 175 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:35:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:35:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 176/409 variables, 233/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/409 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/409 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 409/409 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved in 9699 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 176/409 variables, 233/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 1/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 175/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 409/409 variables, and 472 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 39899ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39913ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 233/234 places, 176/177 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40615 ms. Remains : 233/234 places, 176/177 transitions.
Support contains 84 out of 233 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-22 03:36:13] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-22 03:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
FORMULA DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-22 03:36:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-22 03:36:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (894 resets) in 2502 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 24/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (18 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (17 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 51 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (20 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (17 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (18 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (18 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (18 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (14 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (17 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (18 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (23 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (18 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (18 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (22 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (18 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (20 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
[2024-05-22 03:36:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:36:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 16/57 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 54/111 variables, 26/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 89/200 variables, 22/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 6/206 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 175/381 variables, 206/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 28/409 variables, 27/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/409 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 409/409 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 1423 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 16/57 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 54/111 variables, 26/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 89/200 variables, 22/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 6/206 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 175/381 variables, 206/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 16/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 3/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 28/409 variables, 27/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 8/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 409/409 variables, and 322 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 5014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 6450ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 41 out of 233 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 233 transition count 174
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 233 transition count 174
Applied a total of 7 rules in 37 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 174/176 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 37 ms. Remains : 233/233 places, 174/176 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (526 resets) in 565 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 23/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (11 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (13 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (9 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (10 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (15 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 534296 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=178 ) properties seen :0 out of 23
Probabilistic random walk after 534296 steps, saw 76585 distinct states, run finished after 3008 ms. (steps per millisecond=177 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 233 cols
[2024-05-22 03:36:24] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-22 03:36:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 13/48 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 66/114 variables, 31/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 95/209 variables, 24/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 174/383 variables, 209/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 4/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 24/407 variables, 24/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/407 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 407/407 variables, and 298 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 1353 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 13/48 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 66/114 variables, 31/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 95/209 variables, 24/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 174/383 variables, 209/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 4/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 15/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 5/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 3/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 3/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 24/407 variables, 24/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 8/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/407 variables, 1/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/407 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 407/407 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 22271 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints]
After SMT, in 23646ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Fused 23 Parikh solutions to 20 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 4828 ms.
Support contains 35 out of 233 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 174/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 174/174 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 10 ms. Remains : 233/233 places, 174/174 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (513 resets) in 260 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 21/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (11 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (10 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (11 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (11 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (11 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (11 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 575123 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=191 ) properties seen :0 out of 21
Probabilistic random walk after 575123 steps, saw 82641 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=191 ) properties seen :0
[2024-05-22 03:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:36:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 6/35 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/110 variables, 33/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/208 variables, 24/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 174/382 variables, 208/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 4/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 25/407 variables, 25/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/407 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 407/407 variables, and 298 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 1236 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 6/35 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/110 variables, 33/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/208 variables, 24/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 174/382 variables, 208/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 4/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 13/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 6/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 3/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 5/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 25/407 variables, 25/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 8/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 1/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/407 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 407/407 variables, and 334 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 9719 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 10967ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Fused 21 Parikh solutions to 19 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5055 ms.
Support contains 29 out of 233 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 174/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 174/174 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 233/233 places, 174/174 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (517 resets) in 354 ms. (112 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (12 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (9 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (10 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (11 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (12 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (11 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (11 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (11 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 566799 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=188 ) properties seen :0 out of 21
Probabilistic random walk after 566799 steps, saw 81469 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=188 ) properties seen :0
[2024-05-22 03:37:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:37:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 6/35 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/110 variables, 33/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/208 variables, 24/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 174/382 variables, 208/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 4/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 25/407 variables, 25/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/407 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 407/407 variables, and 298 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 1240 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 6/35 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/110 variables, 33/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/208 variables, 24/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 174/382 variables, 208/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 4/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 13/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 6/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 3/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 5/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 25/407 variables, 25/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 8/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 1/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/407 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 407/407 variables, and 334 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 9676 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 10925ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Fused 21 Parikh solutions to 19 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5096 ms.
Support contains 29 out of 233 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 174/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 174/174 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 10 ms. Remains : 233/233 places, 174/174 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 174/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 174/174 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:37:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:37:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 133 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 174/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 174/174 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 151 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 174/174 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (525 resets) in 334 ms. (119 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (11 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (11 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (11 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 558259 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=186 ) properties seen :0 out of 21
Probabilistic random walk after 558259 steps, saw 80216 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=186 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 232 cols
[2024-05-22 03:37:34] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:37:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 6/35 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 74/109 variables, 32/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/207 variables, 24/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 174/381 variables, 207/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 2/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 25/406 variables, 25/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 406/406 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 1117 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 232/232 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 6/35 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 74/109 variables, 32/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 98/207 variables, 24/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 174/381 variables, 207/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 13/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 7/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 25/406 variables, 25/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 8/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 2/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 1/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 406/406 variables, and 328 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 14196 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 232/232 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 15329ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Fused 21 Parikh solutions to 20 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 17 properties in 23773 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 174/174 transitions.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 232 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 231 transition count 173
Applied a total of 2 rules in 28 ms. Remains 231 /232 variables (removed 1) and now considering 173/174 (removed 1) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 28 ms. Remains : 231/232 places, 173/174 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-22 03:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-22 03:38:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
Computed a total of 136 stabilizing places and 130 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 233 cols
[2024-05-22 03:38:14] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-22 03:38:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 117 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 121 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:38:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-22 03:38:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-22 03:38:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:38:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 03:38:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 03:38:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17117294391525284469.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 03:38:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1341942130989185807.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17117294391525284469.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1341942130989185807.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 03:38:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11343752566126719827.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11343752566126719827.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11343752566126719827.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11343752566126719827.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11343752566126719827.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:38:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:38:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:38:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2024-05-22 03:38:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:38:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3565324526963252202.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 03:38:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12953665641317688554.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3565324526963252202.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12953665641317688554.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,3.41366,112244,9778,3490,286041,13166,301,203303,298,83413,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E((A(!(EF((i6.u26.p179==1))) U E(((u47.p31==0)||(u12.p84==1)) U ((u47.p232==0)||(u47.p31==1)))) * ((u12.p87==0) + AG(((i4.i1.u39.p205==...622
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,E((!((E(!(E(((u47.p31==0)||(u12.p84==1)) U ((u47.p232==0)||(u47.p31==1)))) U (!(!(E(TRUE ...1860
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u12.t129, u13.t11, u47.t5, u47.t40, i0.i0.t0, i0.i0.t167, i0.i0.t173, i...629
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:39:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:39:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 187 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 189 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 195 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-22 03:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-22 03:39:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-22 03:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-22 03:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1695186578327887508.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 03:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7213151718393980635.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1695186578327887508.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7213151718393980635.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:39:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-22 03:39:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:39:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5736590574123224555.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5736590574123224555.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5736590574123224555.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5736590574123224555.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5736590574123224555.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:39:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:39:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:39:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 37 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:39:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2024-05-22 03:39:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 27 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:39:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2390616165613605418.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 03:39:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10136191123084719338.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2390616165613605418.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10136191123084719338.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,3.93887,106160,14913,2559,226001,12259,328,337007,301,76951,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(AF((((EF(((i6.u22.p170==0)&&(i11.u47.p224==1))) + (i1.u11.p147==0)) + ((i11.u44.p215==0)&&(i4.i0.u26.p178==1))) * !(A((i1.u11.p148==1...316
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((E(TRUE U ((i6.u22.p170==0)&&(i11.u47.p224==1))) + (i1.u11.p147==0)) + ((i11.u44.p215...459
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u12.t129, u48.t5, u48.t40, i0.i0.u0.t10, i0.i0.u6.t174, i0.i1.t0, i0.i1...628
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:40:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:40:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 141 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 146 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:40:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 03:40:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:40:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5843335733998640740.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 03:40:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1682042273846612335.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5843335733998640740.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1682042273846612335.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:40:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 03:40:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:40:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7838686952869606623.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7838686952869606623.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7838686952869606623.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7838686952869606623.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7838686952869606623.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:40:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:40:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:40:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:40:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 03:40:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:40:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14674309302189945796.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:40:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12071578425317248140.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14674309302189945796.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12071578425317248140.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,3.35267,101996,9733,3488,262286,13169,301,186163,298,82215,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EX(AX((AG(((i5.i0.u25.p177==0)||(i1.u2.p104==1))) + (u47.p50==1))))) + AG(AX((AF((i4.u16.p159==1)) + (i5.i0.u25.p178==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((EY(FwdU((Init * !(EG(EX(!(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i5.i0.u25.p177==0)||(i1.u2.p104==1))))) + (u47.p50==1)))))...222
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u12.t129, u13.t11, u47.t5, u47.t40, i0.i0.u0.t10, i0.i0.u6.t174, i0.i1....629
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:41:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:41:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 202 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 202 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 209 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:41:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:41:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4943063824628429389.gal : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 03:41:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17169183514219583030.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4943063824628429389.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17169183514219583030.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:41:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 03:41:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:41:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8897485672518703410.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8897485672518703410.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8897485672518703410.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8897485672518703410.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8897485672518703410.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:41:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:41:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:41:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:41:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 03:41:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:41:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18301271301351908736.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 03:41:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14859388282989627197.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18301271301351908736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14859388282989627197.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,3.31529,108072,9766,3488,274545,13197,303,192409,296,78234,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(((!((u48.p59==0)||(i0.u2.p94==1)))||(u14.p19!=1))) U (!((A(EX(((u48.p58==0)||(u48.p53==1))) U E((i0.u2.p111==0) U (i0.u2.p95==1))) +...203
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(((FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U ((!((u48.p59==0)||(i0.u2.p94==1)))||(u14.p19!=1)))) * ((u13.p80==0)||(u14.p15==1))...489
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u13.t129, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t40, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t70, i0.u2.t74, i0....629
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 231 transition count 175
Applied a total of 1 rules in 20 ms. Remains 231 /233 variables (removed 2) and now considering 175/176 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 231 cols
[2024-05-22 03:42:16] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-22 03:42:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 03:42:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:42:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 227 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 358 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 03:42:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 172 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:42:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/230 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 175/405 variables, 230/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 1/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 4/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/406 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 406/406 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 11363 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 231/231 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/230 variables, 7/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 175/405 variables, 230/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 172/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 4/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/406 variables, 1/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 406/406 variables, and 470 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 231/231 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 41460ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41462ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 231/233 places, 175/176 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41852 ms. Remains : 231/233 places, 175/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:42:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:42:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:42:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 175 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:42:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:42:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:42:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14880855346197692380.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 03:42:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4544625455054035129.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14880855346197692380.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4544625455054035129.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 03:43:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8842385712835014491.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8842385712835014491.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8842385712835014491.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8842385712835014491.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8842385712835014491.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:43:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:43:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:43:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-22 03:43:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:43:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17925556083822837419.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:43:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10981588566419655199.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17925556083822837419.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10981588566419655199.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,1.40472,53348,5077,3568,118917,8125,248,119674,292,45354,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((u48.p31==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((u48.p31==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t135, t136, t168, u13.t128, u14.t10, u48.t5, u48.t39, i0.i0.u0.t9, i0.i0.u6.t173, i0.i1.t...628
(forward)formula 0,1,9.56349,321836,1,0,649458,71626,1886,1.23571e+06,3244,365314,841789
FORMULA DES-PT-30a-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 233 cols
[2024-05-22 03:43:37] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:43:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 159 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 163 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:43:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:43:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 03:43:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:43:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:43:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-22 03:43:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17650843925680747809.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:43:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2156020987241900890.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17650843925680747809.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2156020987241900890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:44:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:44:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:44:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4995610383414026424.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4995610383414026424.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4995610383414026424.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4995610383414026424.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4995610383414026424.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:44:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:44:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:44:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:44:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2024-05-22 03:44:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:44:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14954235100098274642.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:44:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4432546326222541598.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14954235100098274642.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4432546326222541598.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,2.98871,105196,9253,3490,269343,13147,320,166626,298,83409,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX((EF(((i5.i1.u25.p178==0)&&(i11.i1.u46.p225==1))) + !(E((i1.u2.p126==0) U (i11.i1.u43.p213==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((E(TRUE U ((i5.i1.u25.p178==0)&&(i11.i1.u46.p225==1))) + !(E((i1.u2.p126==0) U (i11.i1.u43.p21...177
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u12.t129, u13.t11, u47.t5, u47.t40, i0.i0.t0, i0.i0.t167, i0.i0.t173, i...635
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 231 transition count 175
Applied a total of 1 rules in 18 ms. Remains 231 /233 variables (removed 2) and now considering 175/176 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 231 cols
[2024-05-22 03:44:38] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:44:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 03:44:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:44:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 313 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 505 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 03:44:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 172 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:44:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/230 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 175/405 variables, 230/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 1/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 4/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/406 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 406/406 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 11558 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 231/231 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/230 variables, 7/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 175/405 variables, 230/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 172/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 4/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/406 variables, 1/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 406/406 variables, and 470 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 231/231 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 41731ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41733ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 231/233 places, 175/176 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42265 ms. Remains : 231/233 places, 175/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:45:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 03:45:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:45:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 175 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:45:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 03:45:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 03:45:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7896798943193557250.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 03:45:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16450810946416599928.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7896798943193557250.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16450810946416599928.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:45:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:45:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:45:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10003730511500759925.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10003730511500759925.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10003730511500759925.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10003730511500759925.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10003730511500759925.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:45:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:45:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:45:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:45:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 03:45:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:45:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2281846601251852761.gal : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 03:45:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16093751526952682973.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2281846601251852761.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16093751526952682973.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,2.99262,105348,10429,3552,269696,7453,244,193640,294,39230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((i12.u44.p220!=0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(i12.u44.p220!=0))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 233 cols
[2024-05-22 03:46:20] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 03:46:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 146 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 162 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 169 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 03:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 03:46:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 03:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 03:46:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4019723626188856578.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:46:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4179606801059261155.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4019723626188856578.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4179606801059261155.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:46:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:46:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:46:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3826164213557041505.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3826164213557041505.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3826164213557041505.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3826164213557041505.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3826164213557041505.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:46:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:46:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:46:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:46:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2024-05-22 03:46:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:46:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1579350957058517589.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:46:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9026004502390592648.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1579350957058517589.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9026004502390592648.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,2.88991,101200,9747,3488,258213,13164,301,180613,298,82084,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AG(((i1.u2.p92==0) * (EG((u12.p80==0)) + AX((u47.p54==0))))) * (u47.p32==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i1.u2.p92==0) * (EG((u12.p80==0)) + !(EX(!((u47.p54==0))))))))) * (u47.p32==0))))] ...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u12.t129, u13.t11, u47.t5, u47.t40, i0.i0.u0.t10, i0.i0.u6.t174, i0.i1....629
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:47:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:47:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 133 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 137 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:47:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:47:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 03:47:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:47:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:47:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:47:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16938545125484308058.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 03:47:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8470464028822939616.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16938545125484308058.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8470464028822939616.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:47:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:47:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:47:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1685023399653713013.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1685023399653713013.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1685023399653713013.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1685023399653713013.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1685023399653713013.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:47:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:47:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:47:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 38 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:47:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 03:47:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:47:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11820627741662721057.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:47:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16420758357645132355.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11820627741662721057.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16420758357645132355.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,5.7918,118040,14974,2564,247542,12256,327,377499,298,76773,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((i0.u2.p108==0)||(u12.p149==1))) * EF((((i3.u14.p154!=1)||(i0.u2.p100==1)) * EX((u12.p66==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU((Init * EX(((i0.u2.p108==0)||(u12.p149==1)))),TRUE) * ((i3.u14.p154!=1)||(i0.u2.p100==1)))) * (u12.p6...171
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u12.t129, u48.t5, u48.t40, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t70, i0.u2.t74, i0.u2.t75, i...628
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:48:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:48:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 133 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 137 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:48:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:48:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11527430897327345053.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:48:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8499295921154422973.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11527430897327345053.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8499295921154422973.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:48:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 03:48:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:48:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16680871608243531451.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16680871608243531451.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16680871608243531451.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16680871608243531451.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16680871608243531451.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:48:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:48:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:48:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 40 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:48:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 03:48:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:48:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6149143253206294508.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:48:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15110092626260024137.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6149143253206294508.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15110092626260024137.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,5.99116,118048,14956,2564,244378,12244,334,402958,295,76811,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AF(((u13.p78==0)&&(i7.i1.u26.p175==1))) * EX(TRUE)) * (EG(((u13.p76==0)&&(i3.u14.p151==1))) * ((i1.u2.p105==1)||((i0.i1.u42.p208==0)...178
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EG(!(((u13.p78==0)&&(i7.i1.u26.p175==1))))) * EX(TRUE)) * (EG(((u13.p76==0)&&(i3.u14.p151==1)))...229
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u13.t129, u49.t5, u49.t40, i0.i0.u0.t10, i0.i0.u6.t174, i0.i1.t0, i0.i1...628
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:49:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:49:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 134 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 138 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:49:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:49:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10568092560155487597.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:49:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16076411868070108329.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10568092560155487597.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16076411868070108329.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:49:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 03:49:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:49:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12642246034741848881.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12642246034741848881.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12642246034741848881.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12642246034741848881.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12642246034741848881.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:49:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:49:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:49:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:49:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 03:49:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:49:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1458299790135258010.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:49:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7904100438206808733.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1458299790135258010.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7904100438206808733.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,3.68751,112288,9735,3483,288107,13184,297,196065,298,83280,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(!(A(AX(((u14.p11==0)||(u48.p232==1))) U EG(((u14.p2==0)||(i1.u2.p117==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!((E(!(EG(((u14.p2==0)||(i1.u2.p117==1)))) U (!(!(EX(!(((u14.p11==0)||(u48.p232==1)))))) * !(E...250
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u13.t129, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t40, i0.i0.t0, i0.i0.t167, i0.i0.t173, i...629
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:50:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:50:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 03:50:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:50:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 03:50:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 224 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 372 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 175 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:50:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:50:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 176/409 variables, 233/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/409 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/409 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 409/409 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved in 9253 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 176/409 variables, 233/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 1/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 175/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
[2024-05-22 03:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 409/409 variables, and 472 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 39365ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39367ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39743 ms. Remains : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 03:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:51:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:51:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14348891145788103192.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:51:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2972373211975379310.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14348891145788103192.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2972373211975379310.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:51:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:51:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:51:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9019573743560813741.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9019573743560813741.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9019573743560813741.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9019573743560813741.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9019573743560813741.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:51:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:51:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:51:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:51:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 03:51:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:51:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17772517347582002466.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:51:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11767820832331253641.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17772517347582002466.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11767820832331253641.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,3.37765,105416,10516,3490,258612,13172,290,191623,298,78282,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(AF(((u13.p78==0)&&(i12.u3.p131==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((u13.p78==0)&&(i12.u3.p131==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u13.t129, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t40, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t70, i0.u2.t74, i0....629
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:52:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:52:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 134 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 153 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:52:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:52:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:52:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:52:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:52:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:52:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1412782600067027579.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 03:52:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13698836400236931819.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1412782600067027579.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13698836400236931819.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:52:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 03:52:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:52:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1843082435314505958.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1843082435314505958.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1843082435314505958.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1843082435314505958.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1843082435314505958.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:52:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:52:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:52:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:52:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 03:52:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:52:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14359899476226819472.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:52:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5791145136608556414.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14359899476226819472.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5791145136608556414.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,3.32524,112032,9752,3488,289315,13202,303,204831,296,78337,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((!(E((i7.u28.p181==0) U ((u14.p15==0)||(i8.u37.p199==1)))) * AF((i11.u44.p213==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(E((i7.u28.p181==0) U ((u14.p15==0)||(i8.u37.p199==1)))) * !(EG(!((i11.u44.p213==0))))...167
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u13.t129, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t40, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t70, i0.u2.t74, i0....629
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:53:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:53:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 170 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 175 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:53:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:53:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 03:53:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:53:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:53:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:53:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3189148940661424931.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:53:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality492994696892416729.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3189148940661424931.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality492994696892416729.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:53:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:53:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:53:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9979558323238240236.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9979558323238240236.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9979558323238240236.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9979558323238240236.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9979558323238240236.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:53:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:53:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:53:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:53:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 03:53:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:53:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7059154825833800167.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 03:53:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14597703012678462762.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7059154825833800167.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14597703012678462762.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,2.8261,98824,9687,3483,255265,13178,294,172924,298,82059,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((i11.u45.p218==1) + AF((AF(((u14.p16==0)||(i1.u2.p119==1))) * ((u13.p60==0)||(i1.u2.p90==1))))) U !(EX(((((i1.u12.p147==0)||(i11.u45...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(((((i1.u12.p147==0)||(i11.u45.p218==1))||(i1.u2.p114==0))&&(!((i11.u44.p215==1)&&(u13.p6...525
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u13.t129, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t40, i0.i0.u0.t10, i0.i0.u6.t174, i0.i1....629
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:54:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 03:54:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned [131]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 164 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 168 ms. Remains : 232/233 places, 176/176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 03:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-22 03:54:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 03:54:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12050389500431861538.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 03:54:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15857178041360384571.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12050389500431861538.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15857178041360384571.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 03:54:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5055016833462827544.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5055016833462827544.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5055016833462827544.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5055016833462827544.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5055016833462827544.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:54:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:54:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:54:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-22 03:54:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:54:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11989018857317658864.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 03:54:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16508349533446202244.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11989018857317658864.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16508349533446202244.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,3.35465,113612,9756,3488,293981,13193,303,202640,296,78412,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AF(((i6.u37.p200==0)&&(i9.u34.p194==1))) + (u13.p89==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((EY(Init) * !((u13.p89==1))),!(((i6.u37.p200==0)&&(i9.u34.p194==1))))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 03:55:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:55:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 03:55:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 03:55:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4515121669973306286.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4515121669973306286.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4515121669973306286.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4515121669973306286.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4515121669973306286.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 03:55:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 03:55:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 03:55:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 37 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 03:55:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 03:55:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 27 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 03:55:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4873231008151748930.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 03:55:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13322275587159279627.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4873231008151748930.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13322275587159279627.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 14 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,4.65633,115912,16614,2563,246325,12261,318,348662,306,76778,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E((A(!(EF((i7.u27.p179==1))) U E(((u48.p31==0)||(u12.p84==1)) U ((u48.p232==0)||(u48.p31==1)))) * ((u12.p87==0) + AG(((i5.u40.p205==0)|...616
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,E((!((E(!(E(((u48.p31==0)||(u12.p84==1)) U ((u48.p232==0)||(u48.p31==1)))) U (!(!(E(TRUE ...1845
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t136, t137, t169, u12.t129, u48.t5, u48.t40, i0.i0.t0, i0.i0.t167, i0.i0.t173, i0.i0.u1.t...628
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2024-05-22 04:11:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 04:11:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 04:11:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 04:11:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 04:11:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 221 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 04:11:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-22 04:11:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 123 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 04:11:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11508989730620950.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 04:11:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10281672148967755821.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11508989730620950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10281672148967755821.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 14 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.637e+13,1043.02,7513348,754135,536,2.03144e+07,1407,273,1.39361e+07,168,10612,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E((A(!(EF((u34.p179==1))) U E(((u2.p31==0)||(u3.p84==1)) U ((i52.u59.p232==0)||(u2.p31==1)))) * ((u3.p87==0) + AG(((u47.p205==0)||(u3.p...574
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,E((!((E(!(E(((u2.p31==0)||(u3.p84==1)) U ((i52.u59.p232==0)||(u2.p31==1)))) U (!(!(E(TRUE...1777
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t30, t50, t81, t119, t136, t137, t146, t167, t169, t173, u5.t10, u6.t9, u7.t8, u12.t1...281

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-30a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-30a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189800697"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-30a.tgz
mv DES-PT-30a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;