Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r092-tall-171624189800666.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-10a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189800666
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 19 07:08 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 19 15:41 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K Apr 22 14:36 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 22 14:36 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 12 08:28 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 146K Apr 12 08:28 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 08:26 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K Apr 12 08:26 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K Apr 22 14:36 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 22 14:36 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716341698190

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-10a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-22 01:34:59] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-22 01:34:59] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-22 01:34:59] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 64 ms
[2024-05-22 01:34:59] [INFO ] Transformed 155 places.
[2024-05-22 01:34:59] [INFO ] Transformed 112 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:34:59] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-22 01:34:59] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 155 places and 112 transitions and 552 arcs in 195 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 14 transitions.
Support contains 121 out of 155 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 155/155 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 154 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 154 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 18 ms. Remains 154 /155 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 154 cols
[2024-05-22 01:34:59] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 16 ms
[2024-05-22 01:34:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 244 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 01:34:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:35:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 01:35:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 404 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:35:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:35:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/251 variables, 154/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 2/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 251/251 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 4180 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 4/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/251 variables, 154/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 96/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 2/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 251/251 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 17139 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 21399ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 21420ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 154/155 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21869 ms. Remains : 154/155 places, 97/98 transitions.
Support contains 121 out of 154 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-22 01:35:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2024-05-22 01:35:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-22 01:35:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 84 to 82
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (885 resets) in 1833 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 29/82 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (23 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (17 resets) in 81 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (20 resets) in 52 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (18 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 28/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (20 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (19 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (18 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (25 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (26 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (13 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (26 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (14 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (19 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (15 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (19 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (14 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (19 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (19 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (17 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (22 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
[2024-05-22 01:35:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:35:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 48/108 variables, 33/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 38/146 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 27 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp73 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 97/243 variables, 146/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 1/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 2/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 8/251 variables, 8/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 251/251 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved in 1412 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp71 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/103 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 43/146 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 97/243 variables, 146/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 2/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 8/251 variables, 8/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 23/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 251/251 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved in 3682 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/28 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 5127ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
Fused 25 Parikh solutions to 24 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 2024 ms.
Support contains 46 out of 154 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 154 transition count 96
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 154 transition count 96
Applied a total of 5 rules in 19 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/97 (removed 1) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 19 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 96/97 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (877 resets) in 1705 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (29 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (20 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (25 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (12 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (22 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (19 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (22 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (15 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (14 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (18 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (20 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (18 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (20 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (27 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (18 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 634335 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=211 ) properties seen :0 out of 22
Probabilistic random walk after 634335 steps, saw 88590 distinct states, run finished after 3004 ms. (steps per millisecond=211 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 154 cols
[2024-05-22 01:35:33] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:35:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/83 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 21/104 variables, 11/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 41/145 variables, 24/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 96/241 variables, 145/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 3/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 2/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 9/250 variables, 9/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 2/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 250/250 variables, and 223 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 1948 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/83 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 21/104 variables, 11/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/145 variables, 24/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 96/241 variables, 145/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 3/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 2/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 9/250 variables, 9/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 2/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 250/250 variables, and 248 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 4346 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 6313ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Fused 22 Parikh solutions to 20 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2132 ms.
Support contains 46 out of 154 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 96/96 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:35:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:35:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 98 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 96/96 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (887 resets) in 257 ms. (155 steps per ms) remains 21/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (14 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (25 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (23 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (21 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (18 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (17 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (20 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (17 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (15 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (28 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (32 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 659359 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=219 ) properties seen :0 out of 21
Probabilistic random walk after 659359 steps, saw 91528 distinct states, run finished after 3002 ms. (steps per millisecond=219 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 153 cols
[2024-05-22 01:35:45] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 01:35:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/82 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/102 variables, 10/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 41/143 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 96/239 variables, 143/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 3/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 10/249 variables, 10/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 249/249 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 1319 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/82 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/102 variables, 10/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 41/143 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 96/239 variables, 143/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 10/249 variables, 10/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 19/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 249/249 variables, and 243 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 3179 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 4513ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Fused 21 Parikh solutions to 20 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2010 ms.
Support contains 45 out of 153 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 153/153 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 153/153 places, 96/96 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (889 resets) in 300 ms. (132 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (15 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (27 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (17 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (26 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (19 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (16 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (20 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (16 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (15 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (17 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 649872 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=216 ) properties seen :0 out of 21
Probabilistic random walk after 649872 steps, saw 90425 distinct states, run finished after 3002 ms. (steps per millisecond=216 ) properties seen :0
[2024-05-22 01:35:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:35:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/82 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/102 variables, 10/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 41/143 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 96/239 variables, 143/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 10/249 variables, 10/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 249/249 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 1769 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/82 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/102 variables, 10/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 41/143 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 96/239 variables, 143/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 4/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 10/249 variables, 10/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 19/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 249/249 variables, and 244 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 3728 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 5513ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Fused 21 Parikh solutions to 20 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 2408 ms.
Support contains 44 out of 153 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 153/153 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 153/153 places, 96/96 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (878 resets) in 311 ms. (128 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (19 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (26 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (27 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (23 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (15 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (28 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (15 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (20 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (14 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (18 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 665093 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=221 ) properties seen :0 out of 20
Probabilistic random walk after 665093 steps, saw 92195 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=221 ) properties seen :0
[2024-05-22 01:36:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:36:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/81 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/101 variables, 10/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 42/143 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 96/239 variables, 143/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 10/249 variables, 10/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 2/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 249/249 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 2198 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/81 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/101 variables, 10/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 42/143 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 96/239 variables, 143/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 10/249 variables, 10/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 18/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 249/249 variables, and 243 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 3329 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 5537ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Fused 20 Parikh solutions to 19 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 1652 ms.
Support contains 39 out of 153 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 153/153 places, 96/96 transitions.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 153 transition count 96
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 10 ms. Remains : 153/153 places, 96/96 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (874 resets) in 281 ms. (141 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (27 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (14 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (16 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (15 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (21 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (22 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (21 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (32 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (16 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (18 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (18 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 638755 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=212 ) properties seen :0 out of 17
Probabilistic random walk after 638755 steps, saw 89168 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=212 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 153 cols
[2024-05-22 01:36:16] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:36:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 36/75 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 24/99 variables, 12/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 42/141 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 96/237 variables, 141/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 3/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 12/249 variables, 12/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 249/249 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 679 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 36/75 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 24/99 variables, 12/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 42/141 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 96/237 variables, 141/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 3/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 2/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 3/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 12/249 variables, 12/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 15/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 4/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 249/249 variables, and 239 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 3469 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 4170ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Fused 17 Parikh solutions to 15 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2212 ms.
Support contains 39 out of 153 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 153/153 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 11 ms. Remains : 153/153 places, 96/96 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 153/153 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:36:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:36:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 01:36:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:36:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 01:36:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 217 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 01:36:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:36:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:36:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 96/249 variables, 153/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 3/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 249/249 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 1992 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 96/249 variables, 153/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 3/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 95/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 4/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 3/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 2/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 2/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 249/249 variables, and 324 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 25010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 27030ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27031ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 27264 ms. Remains : 153/153 places, 96/96 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 17 properties.
[2024-05-22 01:36:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:36:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 35 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 01:36:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 35 positive and 24 generalized place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 01:36:50] [INFO ] After 134ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:17
[2024-05-22 01:36:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 35 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 01:36:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 35 positive and 24 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 01:36:50] [INFO ] After 290ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :17
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2024-05-22 01:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:51] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 50 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2024-05-22 01:36:51] [INFO ] After 973ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :17
[2024-05-22 01:36:51] [INFO ] After 1338ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :17
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 1502 ms.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-22 01:36:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-22 01:36:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 01:36:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 51 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 154 cols
[2024-05-22 01:36:51] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 01:36:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 01:36:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:36:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 01:36:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:36:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:36:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/251 variables, 154/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 2/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 251/251 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 3762 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 4/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/251 variables, 154/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 96/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 2/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 251/251 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 16765 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 20555ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20556ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20728 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:37:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 01:37:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 01:37:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:37:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:37:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 01:37:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15751051837128168719.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:37:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8225426365639796.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15751051837128168719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8225426365639796.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 01:37:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11863739650122344009.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11863739650122344009.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11863739650122344009.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11863739650122344009.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11863739650122344009.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:37:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:37:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:37:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2024-05-22 01:37:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:37:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11885143107499808144.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 01:37:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12275600668702113710.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11885143107499808144.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12275600668702113710.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,1.23418,42084,5864,432,81846,2040,319,151294,137,6990,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(EX(!(E((i1.u0.p42==1) U ((i0.u2.p33==1)&&(i0.u2.p45==1)))))) U ((AX((EF(((i0.u2.p38==1)&&(i0.u2.p45==1))) + ((((((((i10.u34.p113==1)...1406
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(EX(!((E(TRUE U ((i0.u2.p38==1)&&(i0.u2.p45==1))) + ((((((((i10.u34.p113==1)&&(i11.u35.p115=...4676
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, t90, u13.t50, u49.t5, u49.t21, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t31, i0.u2.t35, i0.u2.t36, i0.u2...383
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:38:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:38:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 114 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 119 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 01:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:38:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 01:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 01:38:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability566499899192973520.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 01:38:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11010350670214486217.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability566499899192973520.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11010350670214486217.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-22 01:38:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4595243680369297090.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4595243680369297090.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4595243680369297090.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4595243680369297090.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4595243680369297090.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:38:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:38:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:38:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 01:38:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:38:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4452453880776241540.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:38:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10600050336376506395.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4452453880776241540.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10600050336376506395.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,1.38173,46344,5866,432,90465,2039,314,172319,138,7008,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AF((((i7.u19.p84==0)||(i7.u27.p101==0)) * EG(((i2.u5.p54==1)&&(i2.u41.p128==1))))) * AG(((u48.p12==0)||(u48.p150==0)))) * AX(((i0.u2...183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(EG(!((((i7.u19.p84==0)||(i7.u27.p101==0)) * EG(((i2.u5.p54==1)&&(i2.u41.p128==1))))))) *...259
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, t90, u12.t50, u48.t5, u48.t21, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t31, i0.u2.t35, i0.u2.t36, i0.u2...383
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:39:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:39:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 113 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 128 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 01:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 01:39:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 01:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 01:39:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5772340675586675072.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:39:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12642295599593969032.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5772340675586675072.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12642295599593969032.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-22 01:39:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7829368686652231998.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7829368686652231998.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7829368686652231998.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7829368686652231998.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7829368686652231998.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:39:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:39:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:39:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 01:39:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 11 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1320411043760608648.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 01:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13196270117470924517.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1320411043760608648.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13196270117470924517.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,1.33605,45548,5841,429,89326,2043,311,168899,136,7054,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((i1.u7.p62==1)&&(i2.u11.p67==1))&&(i0.u12.p69==1)) U !((((((i11.u23.p90==1)&&(i11.u31.p107==1)) + AF((((i0.u2.p35==1)&&(i0.u2.p45==1)...376
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((((((i11.u23.p90==1)&&(i11.u31.p107==1)) + !(EG(!((((i0.u2.p35==1)&&(i0.u2.p45==1))&&((i2.u6....1488
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, t90, u13.t50, u49.t5, u49.t21, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t31, i0.u2.t35, i0.u2.t36, i0.u2...383
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:40:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:40:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 90 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 92 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 01:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 01:40:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 01:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13618101238328815279.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5861821003336187253.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13618101238328815279.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5861821003336187253.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:40:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 01:40:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:40:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14977949857336028548.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14977949857336028548.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14977949857336028548.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14977949857336028548.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14977949857336028548.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:40:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:40:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:40:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:40:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 01:40:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 11 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:40:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1542564299605937279.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 01:40:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12279905884071474318.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1542564299605937279.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12279905884071474318.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,1.36145,45808,5727,431,90135,2222,311,170504,138,8182,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG(AF((((((i2.u7.p59==1)&&(i2.u8.p61==1))&&((i2.u5.p54==1)&&(i2.u41.p128==1)))&&((i1.u0.p42==0)||(i1.u6.p55==0))) + AF(((i12.i1.u45.p13...642
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((((i2.u7.p59==1)&&(i2.u8.p61==1))&&((i2.u5.p54==1)&&(i2.u41.p128==1)))&&((i1.u0.p42=...1401
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, u48.t5, u48.t21, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t31, i0.u2.t35, i0.u2.t36, i0.u2.t37, i0.u2.t3...389
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:41:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:41:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 113 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 124 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:41:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:41:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7181244138362931244.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:41:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13990246687190639531.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7181244138362931244.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13990246687190639531.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 01:41:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8644655090073917480.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8644655090073917480.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8644655090073917480.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8644655090073917480.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8644655090073917480.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:41:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:41:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:41:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 01:41:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:41:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6386159489152018424.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 01:41:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11381710392982414123.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6386159489152018424.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11381710392982414123.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,1.2978,45548,5866,432,89273,2058,316,169129,138,7089,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((i0.u2.p35==0)||(i0.u2.p45==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((i0.u2.p35==0)||(i0.u2.p45==0)))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,16.9831,344420,1,0,712192,5177,1205,1.60524e+06,784,25188,1033398
FORMULA DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:42:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:42:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 87 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 96 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:42:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:42:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14590204720071337655.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7239392265712586083.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14590204720071337655.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7239392265712586083.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:42:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:42:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph579065171615618942.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph579065171615618942.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph579065171615618942.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph579065171615618942.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph579065171615618942.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:42:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:42:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:42:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:42:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:42:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2748289542330314026.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9832835889367937652.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2748289542330314026.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9832835889367937652.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,0.46203,23372,2089,576,47752,2405,293,56299,139,8924,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AG(((u13.p72==0)||(i13.i0.u43.p135==0))) + !(E(!((EF(((i13.i0.u42.p132==1)&&(i13.i0.u43.p137==1))) + ((u47.p18==1)&&(u47.p150==1))))...254
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((u13.p72==0)||(i13.i0.u43.p135==0))))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(...386
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, t90, u12.t50, u13.t11, u47.t5, u47.t21, i0.u0.t10, i0.u6.t95, i1.t94, i1.t88, i...384
(forward)formula 0,1,6.4334,212396,1,0,439077,8987,1661,660668,1208,39811,458811
FORMULA DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:42:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:42:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 105 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 107 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:42:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:42:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18297020540419407952.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:42:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12047234987398445724.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18297020540419407952.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12047234987398445724.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 01:43:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9780705253149011435.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9780705253149011435.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9780705253149011435.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9780705253149011435.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9780705253149011435.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:43:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:43:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:43:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:43:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:43:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17948018216742687959.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:43:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3830662449857494859.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17948018216742687959.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3830662449857494859.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,0.477331,24168,2194,583,49551,2397,298,58763,137,8369,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EF((((u13.p1==1)&&(u13.p73==1))&&(u13.p75==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (((u13.p1==1)&&(u13.p73==1))&&(u13.p75==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, t90, u12.t50, u13.t11, u47.t5, u47.t21, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t31, i0.u2.t35, i0.u2.t...384
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,2.56522,107592,1,0,234129,8771,1842,410075,1297,36477,303729
FORMULA DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:43:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:43:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 01:43:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:43:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 01:43:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 201 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:43:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:43:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/251 variables, 154/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 2/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 251/251 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 3803 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 4/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/251 variables, 154/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 96/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 2/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 251/251 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 16586 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 20410ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20411ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20614 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:43:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:43:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 01:43:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:43:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:43:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:43:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9665621419454432183.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:43:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17796939965805963741.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9665621419454432183.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17796939965805963741.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:44:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 01:44:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:44:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14846044204551078384.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14846044204551078384.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14846044204551078384.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14846044204551078384.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14846044204551078384.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:44:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:44:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:44:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:44:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:44:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:44:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2694439860972309339.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:44:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9775592203232777370.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2694439860972309339.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9775592203232777370.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,0.448437,22064,2098,583,43446,2390,303,51742,138,8334,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((E(EX(((i0.u2.p46==1)&&(i0.u12.p68==1))) U A(((i13.i1.u47.p149==1)&&(u48.p153==1)) U ((u13.p30==1)&&(u13.p70==1)))) + EG((((u48.p16=...1125
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((E(EX(((i0.u2.p46==1)&&(i0.u12.p68==1))) U !((E(!(((u13.p30==1)&&(u13.p70==1))) U (!(((i13.i1.u47.p...1313
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, t90, u13.t50, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t21, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t31, i0.u2.t35, i0.u2.t...384
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:44:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:44:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 88 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 97 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:44:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:44:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:44:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:44:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:44:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:44:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2995199230829998557.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:44:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4944175928614670966.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2995199230829998557.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4944175928614670966.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:45:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:45:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:45:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17447713364344159988.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17447713364344159988.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17447713364344159988.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17447713364344159988.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17447713364344159988.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:45:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:45:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:45:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:45:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 01:45:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:45:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7092515229775087719.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 01:45:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability633599232048483620.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7092515229775087719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability633599232048483620.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,0.483515,23384,2140,581,47805,2402,300,55816,135,8925,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AF((((!(E((((i0.u9.p62==1)&&(i1.u11.p67==1))&&(i2.u12.p69==1)) U (((i13.i1.u15.p77==1)&&(i13.i1.u16.p79==1))&&(i13.i0.u44.p136==1)))...427
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EG(!((((!(E((((i0.u9.p62==1)&&(i1.u11.p67==1))&&(i2.u12.p69==1)) U (((i13.i1.u15.p77==1)&&(i13.i1...494
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, t90, u13.t50, u14.t11, u48.t5, u48.t21, i0.t94, i0.t88, i0.t0, i0.u1.t9, i1.u0....384
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,11.1109,370220,1,0,767878,10582,2231,1.22568e+06,1404,49077,710922
FORMULA DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:45:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:45:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 77 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 81 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:45:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:45:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:45:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:45:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:45:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:45:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability944857093621569625.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:45:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability669143649066969321.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability944857093621569625.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability669143649066969321.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:45:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 01:45:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:45:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15674014924674003624.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15674014924674003624.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15674014924674003624.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15674014924674003624.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15674014924674003624.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:45:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:45:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:45:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:45:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 01:45:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 11 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:45:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3152393960043941900.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:45:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3428949466374438406.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3152393960043941900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3428949466374438406.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,1.28479,44752,5721,431,87163,2204,311,171433,138,8818,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((((((i7.u29.p104==0)||(i7.u37.p120==0))||((u48.p14==0)||(u48.p150==0))) * EF(((i1.u7.p59==1)&&(i1.u8.p61==1)))) * E((i2.u2.p46==1) U ...354
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX((((((i7.u29.p104==0)||(i7.u37.p120==0))||((u48.p14==0)||(u48.p150==0))) * E(TRUE U ((i1.u7.p59==1...627
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, u48.t5, u48.t21, i0.t90, i0.u0.t10, i0.u6.t95, i0.u12.t50, i1.t94, i1.t88, i1.t...389
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:46:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:46:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 76 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 01:46:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:46:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7598789610499158880.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:46:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6645398298714671799.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7598789610499158880.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6645398298714671799.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:46:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:46:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:46:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2284468475232147242.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2284468475232147242.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2284468475232147242.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2284468475232147242.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2284468475232147242.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:46:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:46:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:46:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:46:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:46:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:46:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8941536324954037774.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:46:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4217211221759909707.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8941536324954037774.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4217211221759909707.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,0.455104,22052,2138,432,45455,2076,314,52874,138,7757,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(((i0.u1.p44==1)&&(i0.u9.p64==1))) * (A((((i4.u13.p5==1)&&(i4.u13.p73==1))&&(i4.u14.p75==1)) U ((i13.i1.u46.p143==1)&&(i13.i1.u47.p14...967
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(((!(((!((E(!(((i0.u5.p54==1)&&(i0.u41.p128==1))) U (!((((i4.u13.p5==1)&&(i4.u13.p73==1))&&(...3007
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, t90, u12.t50, u48.t5, u48.t21, i0.t94, i0.t88, i0.t0, i0.u1.t9, i1.u0.t10, i1.u...383
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 104 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 745 steps (16 resets) in 8 ms. (82 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6968717975880617229.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5347433282118881494.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6968717975880617229.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5347433282118881494.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 95 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 96 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4750536118983030154.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17961177902743820843.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4750536118983030154.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17961177902743820843.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:47:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:47:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15725807814192388972.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15725807814192388972.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15725807814192388972.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15725807814192388972.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15725807814192388972.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:47:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:47:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:47:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:47:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:47:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5972518978220643076.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4946247594018355345.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5972518978220643076.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4946247594018355345.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,1.35082,45820,5869,432,90134,2062,323,169737,135,7112,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((EX(EX(((i0.u2.p40==1)&&(i0.u2.p45==1)))) + ((u49.p19==1)&&(u49.p150==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(EX(EX(((i0.u2.p40==1)&&(i0.u2.p45==1)))) + ((u49.p19==1)&&(u49.p150==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, t90, u13.t50, u49.t5, u49.t21, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t31, i0.u2.t35, i0.u2.t36, i0.u2...383
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,10.8349,276448,1,0,651138,6402,1737,1.33582e+06,1035,28815,890383
FORMULA DES-PT-10a-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:47:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:47:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 86 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 88 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:47:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:47:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10129525687360122110.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:47:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17699324969725828703.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10129525687360122110.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17699324969725828703.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 01:48:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17703940307517524686.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17703940307517524686.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17703940307517524686.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17703940307517524686.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17703940307517524686.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:48:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:48:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:48:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:48:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 11 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:48:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2249927003798258762.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 01:48:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12886453717379031472.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2249927003798258762.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12886453717379031472.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,1.55743,54748,6430,429,93174,2066,280,280281,136,7679,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((AG(EF(((i0.u7.p59==1)&&(i0.u8.p61==1)))) * !((AG(AF(((u49.p14==1)&&(u49.p150==1)))) + !((((!((i0.u1.p44==1)&&(i0.u10.p64==1)))&&(i13...481
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((i0.u7.p59==1)&&(i0.u8.p61==1)))))) * !((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((u49.p14=...1401
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, t90, u13.t50, u49.t5, u49.t21, i0.t94, i0.t88, i0.t0, i0.u1.t9, i1.u0.t10, i1.u...380
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:48:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:48:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 01:48:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:48:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 01:48:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 222 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:48:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 01:48:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/251 variables, 154/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 2/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 251/251 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 3817 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 13/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 4/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/251 variables, 154/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 96/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-22 01:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 01:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 2/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 251/251 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 16846 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 20678ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20680ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20905 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 97/97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:49:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 01:49:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:49:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:49:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 01:49:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 01:49:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6755915255456779837.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-22 01:49:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18259906216040352490.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6755915255456779837.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18259906216040352490.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:49:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 01:49:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:49:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1761101594795684760.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1761101594795684760.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1761101594795684760.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1761101594795684760.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1761101594795684760.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:49:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:49:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:49:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:49:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 01:49:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 11 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:49:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11865561645555673298.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 01:49:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6330479842138995708.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11865561645555673298.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6330479842138995708.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,1.35017,42648,5719,431,83236,2200,312,153486,138,8624,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AX(!(A(((u49.p18==1)&&(u49.p150==1)) U (((u49.p20==1)&&(u49.p150==1))||((((i0.u0.p41==1)&&(i1.u1.p43==1))&&((i2.u2.p47==1)&&(i12.i0.u...618
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(!(!((E(!((((u49.p20==1)&&(u49.p150==1))||((((i0.u0.p41==1)&&(i1.u1.p43==1))&&((i2....1023
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, u49.t5, u49.t21, i0.t90, i0.u0.t10, i0.u6.t95, i0.u13.t50, i1.t94, i1.t88, i1.t...389
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 01:50:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 01:50:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 01:50:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 01:50:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11280197559373349072.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11280197559373349072.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11280197559373349072.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11280197559373349072.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11280197559373349072.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 01:50:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 01:50:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 01:50:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 01:50:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 01:50:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 01:50:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7099112165020808411.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 01:50:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10043887621490943051.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7099112165020808411.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10043887621490943051.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,1.28568,41864,5873,432,80868,2029,320,148269,137,6934,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(EX(!(E((i1.u0.p42==1) U ((i0.u2.p33==1)&&(i0.u2.p45==1)))))) U ((AX((EF(((i0.u2.p38==1)&&(i0.u2.p45==1))) + ((((((((i5.u34.p113==1)&...1406
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(EX(!((E(TRUE U ((i0.u2.p38==1)&&(i0.u2.p45==1))) + ((((((((i5.u34.p113==1)&&(i6.u35.p115==1...4676
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t57, t58, t90, u13.t50, u49.t5, u49.t21, i0.u2.t8, i0.u2.t31, i0.u2.t35, i0.u2.t36, i0.u2...383
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 02:15:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 02:15:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 02:15:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 02:15:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 02:15:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 83 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 02:15:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 02:15:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 44 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 02:15:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12397097301601602105.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 02:15:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4250098517637015744.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12397097301601602105.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4250098517637015744.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,150.587,2805572,312072,85,7.81729e+06,400,271,5.37978e+06,59,1093,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(EX(!(E((u5.p42==1) U ((u4.p33==1)&&(u7.p45==1)))))) U ((AX((EF(((u4.p38==1)&&(u7.p45==1))) + ((((((((u40.p113==1)&&(u41.p115==1))&&(...1180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(EX(!((E(TRUE U ((u4.p38==1)&&(u7.p45==1))) + ((((((((u40.p113==1)&&(u41.p115==1))&&((u42.p1...3914
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t20, t29, t38, t50, t57, t58, t66, t88, t90, t94, u5.t10, u6.t9, u7.t8, u12.t95, i50....273
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 137
[2024-05-22 02:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 02:26:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-22 02:26:03] [INFO ] Transformed 154 places.
[2024-05-22 02:26:03] [INFO ] Transformed 97 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2024-05-22 02:26:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2396098394680671979.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 02:26:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12125969676707415752.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2396098394680671979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12125969676707415752.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36574e+12,55.1684,1354568,2,1.47967e+06,5,5.96574e+06,6,0,712,5.50307e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-10a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-10a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189800666"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-10a.tgz
mv DES-PT-10a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;