Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r092-tall-171624189700625.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-01b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189700625
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 580K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 22 14:36 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 22 14:36 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K May 19 07:15 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 19 18:08 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 12 08:07 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 161K Apr 12 08:07 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Apr 12 08:06 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K Apr 12 08:06 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K Apr 22 14:36 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 22 14:36 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716335701207

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-01b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-21 23:55:02] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-21 23:55:02] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-21 23:55:02] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 84 ms
[2024-05-21 23:55:02] [INFO ] Transformed 284 places.
[2024-05-21 23:55:02] [INFO ] Transformed 235 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:55:02] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-21 23:55:02] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 284 places and 235 transitions and 683 arcs in 184 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 17 ms.
Support contains 102 out of 284 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 272 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 272 transition count 223
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 268 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 268 transition count 219
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 268 transition count 215
Applied a total of 36 rules in 53 ms. Remains 268 /284 variables (removed 16) and now considering 215/235 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 215 rows 268 cols
[2024-05-21 23:55:02] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 27 ms
[2024-05-21 23:55:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 365 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:55:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:55:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 223 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 621 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 214 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:55:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/268 variables, 39/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 16/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 20/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 20/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 20/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 9/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 13/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 3/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 85 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 12/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 215/483 variables, 268/452 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 0/452 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/483 variables, 2/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 483/483 variables, and 454 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 268/268 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 214/214 constraints, Known Traps: 121/121 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/268 variables, 39/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 16/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 121/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 3/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 12/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 215/483 variables, 268/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 214/685 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 8/693 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 483/483 variables, and 693 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 268/268 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 214/214 constraints, Known Traps: 146/146 constraints]
After SMT, in 60101ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60128ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 268/284 places, 215/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60832 ms. Remains : 268/284 places, 215/235 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 268 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-21 23:56:03] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-21 23:56:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-21 23:56:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 215 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 268 places (down from 102) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
RANDOM walk for 29509 steps (287 resets) in 994 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 0/53 properties
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 215 transitions.
Computed a total of 68 stabilizing places and 59 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 482 edges and 268 vertex of which 257 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 11 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 265 transition count 215
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 253 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 253 transition count 201
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 247 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 247 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 247 transition count 192
Applied a total of 44 rules in 19 ms. Remains 247 /268 variables (removed 21) and now considering 192/215 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 247 cols
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 299 ms returned [4]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 301 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 246/268 places, 192/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 246 /246 variables (removed 0) and now considering 192/192 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 327 ms. Remains : 246/268 places, 192/215 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 192 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6016361296833616979.gal : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16557146489934494856.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6016361296833616979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16557146489934494856.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06022e+16,24.4778,701740,2,418668,5,2.9202e+06,6,0,1177,2.88553e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 23:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 23:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15225127266918767249.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15225127266918767249.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15225127266918767249.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15225127266918767249.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15225127266918767249.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 23:56:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 23:56:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 23:56:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:56:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 19 ms.
[2024-05-21 23:56:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5146549602463103744.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:56:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8811783269348426639.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5146549602463103744.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8811783269348426639.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06022e+16,0.650826,26776,3161,72,36573,364,700,154496,84,999,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((A(AX((i9.u66.p240==1)) U ((((i4.u28.p115==1) * EF((i7.i1.u50.p185==1))) * (AF((i0.i0.u2.p8==0)) + (i2.u10.p41==0))) + ((((((i8.i0.u41...445
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(((((i4.u28.p115==1) * E(TRUE U (i7.i1.u50.p185==1))) * (!(EG(!((i0.i0.u2.p8==0)))) ...1149
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t10, t53, t55, t57, t141, t185, i0.i1.u16.t108, i0.i1.u16.t109, i0.i1.u32.t80, i1.t129, i...803
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 266 transition count 215
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 251 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 251 transition count 200
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 251 transition count 197
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 242 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 242 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 242 transition count 182
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 241 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 241 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 241 transition count 180
Applied a total of 62 rules in 16 ms. Remains 241 /268 variables (removed 27) and now considering 180/215 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 241 cols
[2024-05-21 23:57:05] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned [4, 7]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 121 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 239/268 places, 180/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 239 /239 variables (removed 0) and now considering 180/180 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 139 ms. Remains : 239/268 places, 180/215 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:57:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 180 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:57:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11625994004237976075.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3711934445559259300.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11625994004237976075.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3711934445559259300.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.74514e+15,22.8128,668752,2,417100,5,2.58266e+06,6,0,1134,2.72596e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 23:57:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 23:57:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10545091759849579595.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10545091759849579595.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10545091759849579595.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10545091759849579595.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10545091759849579595.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 23:57:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 23:57:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 23:57:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:57:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-21 23:57:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6691084895452919435.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12185598500566819747.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6691084895452919435.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12185598500566819747.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.74514e+15,0.197133,11932,2312,66,19352,422,651,26785,84,1033,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((i8.i0.i1.u41.p153==0)||(i6.u36.p141==1))) U ((EF(AG(AX((i4.u27.p95==0)))) * (i7.i1.i2.u43.p167==0)) * !(AG((AX((i8.i0.i1.u41.p176==...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(((i8.i0.i1.u41.p153==0)||(i6.u36.p141==1)))) * (E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((i4.u27.p...277
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t54, t87, t132, t173, i0.u8.t116, i1.t120, i1.u6.t125, i1.u6.t126, i1.u7.t122, i1.u7.t123...716
(forward)formula 0,1,19.7416,500596,1,0,1.0808e+06,1345,3945,1.51784e+06,442,3937,1273022
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 266 transition count 215
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 252 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 252 transition count 201
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 252 transition count 198
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 245 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 245 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 245 transition count 186
Applied a total of 52 rules in 18 ms. Remains 245 /268 variables (removed 23) and now considering 186/215 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 186 rows 245 cols
[2024-05-21 23:57:55] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned [8]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 107 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 244/268 places, 186/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 186/186 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 134 ms. Remains : 244/268 places, 186/215 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 186 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17787134016791937535.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:57:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16705511444617782450.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17787134016791937535.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16705511444617782450.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.28061e+15,22.8656,670096,2,417371,5,2.5969e+06,6,0,1160,2.73068e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 23:58:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 23:58:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17348569970434897263.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17348569970434897263.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17348569970434897263.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17348569970434897263.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17348569970434897263.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 23:58:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 23:58:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 23:58:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:58:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-21 23:58:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6308458859280622651.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3210588638547712916.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6308458859280622651.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3210588638547712916.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.28061e+15,0.371604,17844,2063,69,29352,557,711,58353,86,1831,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EF(((E(((i1.u6.p19==0)||(i2.u12.p42==1)) U (i10.i0.u70.p260==1)) * (i4.i3.u27.p106==1)) * (((i7.i3.u65.p218==0)||(i4.i2.u26.p89==1))|...541
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U ((E(((i1.u6.p19==0)||(i2.u12.p42==1)) U (i10.i0.u70.p260==1)) * (i4.i3.u27.p106==1...1178
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t52, t54, t56, t58, t87, t138, i0.i0.u41.t74, i1.t126, i1.u7.t131, i1.u7.t132, i1.u8.t128, i1...777
(forward)formula 0,1,2.8503,94404,1,0,186016,966,4157,421074,455,3199,322861
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 482 edges and 268 vertex of which 260 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 259 transition count 192
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 240 transition count 192
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 240 transition count 182
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 230 transition count 182
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 217 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 217 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 217 transition count 165
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 216 transition count 165
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 216 transition count 164
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 215 transition count 164
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 207 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 207 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 207 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 206 transition count 148
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 206 transition count 145
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 203 transition count 145
Performed 69 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 134 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 132 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 130 transition count 74
Applied a total of 265 rules in 57 ms. Remains 130 /268 variables (removed 138) and now considering 74/215 (removed 141) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 130 cols
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/268 places, 74/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 129 /129 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 141 ms. Remains : 129/268 places, 74/215 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
RANDOM walk for 276 steps (10 resets) in 11 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4410013336181201772.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15736661114095586535.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4410013336181201772.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15736661114095586535.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 482 edges and 268 vertex of which 258 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 10 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 10 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 257 transition count 194
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 241 transition count 194
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 241 transition count 184
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 231 transition count 184
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 219 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 219 transition count 172
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 219 transition count 169
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 218 transition count 169
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 218 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 217 transition count 168
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 209 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 209 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 209 transition count 153
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 208 transition count 152
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 208 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 205 transition count 149
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 137 transition count 81
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 137 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 135 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 133 transition count 79
Applied a total of 257 rules in 56 ms. Remains 133 /268 variables (removed 135) and now considering 79/215 (removed 136) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 133 cols
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 86 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/268 places, 79/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 146 ms. Remains : 132/268 places, 79/215 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11325613325822493196.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2748895658007743083.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11325613325822493196.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2748895658007743083.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.12707e+09,1.04241,38048,2,51096,5,186684,6,0,605,155092,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((((p211==0) + EF((p165==0))) + EG(E((p223==1) U ((p23==0)||(p84==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((((p211==0) + E(TRUE U (p165==0))) + EG(E((p223==1) U ((p23==0)||(p84==1)))))))))] != FA...158
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t8, t9, t14, t20, t45, t51, t52, t54, t55, t66, t70, t77, Intersection with reac...230
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 23:58:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 23:58:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11277375652997330183.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11277375652997330183.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11277375652997330183.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11277375652997330183.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11277375652997330183.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 23:58:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 23:58:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 23:58:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:58:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 23:58:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7585790463631121113.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:58:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15272467014877663672.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7585790463631121113.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15272467014877663672.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.12707e+09,0.065057,6676,1208,194,6940,717,361,6829,94,2222,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((((i10.u37.p211==0) + EF((i4.i1.u17.p165==0))) + EG(E((i4.i2.u26.p223==1) U ((i1.u0.p23==0)||(i1.u6.p84==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((((i10.u37.p211==0) + E(TRUE U (i4.i1.u17.p165==0))) + EG(E((i4.i2.u26.p223==1) U ((i1.u...198
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t55, t66, t70, t77, i0.i0.u2.t9, i0.i0.u2.t14, i0.i1.u1.t45, i1.u6.t8, i1.u7.t54, i2.t52,...296
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,22.653,684344,1,0,1.83697e+06,6165,2222,1.86788e+06,554,31698,2218643
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 265 transition count 215
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 250 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 250 transition count 200
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 250 transition count 198
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 240 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 240 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 240 transition count 182
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 239 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 239 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 239 transition count 180
Applied a total of 64 rules in 15 ms. Remains 239 /268 variables (removed 29) and now considering 180/215 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 239 cols
[2024-05-21 23:59:21] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:59:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned [4, 7]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 209 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/268 places, 180/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 237 /237 variables (removed 0) and now considering 180/180 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 231 ms. Remains : 237/268 places, 180/215 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:59:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 180 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:59:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6974723468466308923.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:59:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3987587876365144080.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6974723468466308923.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3987587876365144080.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.84721e+15,28.4767,675928,2,416205,5,2.5797e+06,6,0,1129,2.72478e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 23:59:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 23:59:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 23:59:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11917217128851020345.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11917217128851020345.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11917217128851020345.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11917217128851020345.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11917217128851020345.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 23:59:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 23:59:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 23:59:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:59:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 23:59:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2024-05-21 23:59:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11638585083240600144.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:59:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4218862085428337523.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11638585083240600144.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4218862085428337523.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.84721e+15,1.09027,39152,7746,72,87629,485,695,67081,81,1390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(((i11.i0.u15.p65==0)||(i13.i1.u33.p140==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(((i11.i0.u15.p65==0)||(i13.i1.u33.p140==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t62, t87, t132, t154, t174, i0.t120, i0.u7.t125, i0.u7.t126, i0.u8.t122, i0.u8.t123,...754
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 265 transition count 215
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 250 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 250 transition count 200
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 250 transition count 197
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 240 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 240 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 240 transition count 181
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 239 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 239 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 239 transition count 179
Applied a total of 65 rules in 13 ms. Remains 239 /268 variables (removed 29) and now considering 179/215 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 239 cols
[2024-05-22 00:00:22] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:00:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned [4, 7]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 179 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/268 places, 179/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 237 /237 variables (removed 0) and now considering 179/179 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 203 ms. Remains : 237/268 places, 179/215 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:00:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:00:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 00:00:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 179 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:00:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:00:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:00:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13229761606295868991.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 00:00:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9939995791683896926.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13229761606295868991.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9939995791683896926.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.72579e+15,24.7447,668628,2,416920,5,2.58007e+06,6,0,1128,2.72648e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 00:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 00:00:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 00:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2015083396752967522.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2015083396752967522.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2015083396752967522.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2015083396752967522.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2015083396752967522.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 00:00:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 00:00:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 00:00:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 00:00:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:00:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17190625472824208996.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:00:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3481541814611323058.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17190625472824208996.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3481541814611323058.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.72579e+15,0.308756,15728,2275,65,26824,656,605,46603,81,2257,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(AX((i7.u67.p246==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((i7.u67.p246==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t53, t55, t57, t88, t132, i0.u11.t116, i1.u77.t17, i2.u14.t110, i3.t120, i3.u7.t125, i3.u...695
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 482 edges and 268 vertex of which 257 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 11 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 11 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 256 transition count 192
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 239 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 238 transition count 191
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 238 transition count 181
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 228 transition count 181
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 215 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 215 transition count 168
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 215 transition count 164
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 214 transition count 164
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 214 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 213 transition count 163
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 205 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 205 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 205 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 204 transition count 147
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 204 transition count 144
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 201 transition count 144
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 133 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 131 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 129 transition count 74
Applied a total of 261 rules in 34 ms. Remains 129 /268 variables (removed 139) and now considering 74/215 (removed 141) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 129 cols
[2024-05-22 00:01:22] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 105 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 128/268 places, 74/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 142 ms. Remains : 128/268 places, 74/215 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality415870104128304814.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13036452420401793071.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality415870104128304814.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13036452420401793071.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.75313e+09,0.838839,30580,2,38139,5,150945,6,0,584,125526,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((p256==1) U AF(((p219==0)||(p208==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((p256==1) U !(EG(!(((p219==0)||(p208==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t6, t8, t12, t14, t20, t33, t44, t50, t51, t53, t54, t65, t68, Intersection with rea...231
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 00:01:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 00:01:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7046502150514881318.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7046502150514881318.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7046502150514881318.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7046502150514881318.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7046502150514881318.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 00:01:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 00:01:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 00:01:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 7 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:01:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:01:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17258020670962162922.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1144728839653884467.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17258020670962162922.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1144728839653884467.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.75313e+09,0.047974,5576,612,64,4159,246,314,5153,77,472,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((i12.i1.u44.p256==1) U AF(((i9.i0.u34.p219==0)||(i8.u33.p208==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((i12.i1.u44.p256==1) U !(EG(!(((i9.i0.u34.p219==0)||(i8.u33.p208==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t33, t65, t68, u2.t44, u49.t0, i0.u3.t8, i0.u3.t14, i1.t53, i1.u1.t12, i1.u7.t6, i2.t51, i2.u...292
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,0.879963,49664,1,0,126355,611,1565,117616,358,1502,171948
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 482 edges and 268 vertex of which 257 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 11 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 11 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 256 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 238 transition count 191
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 238 transition count 182
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 229 transition count 182
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 216 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 216 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 216 transition count 165
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 215 transition count 165
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 215 transition count 164
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 214 transition count 164
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 206 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 206 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 206 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 205 transition count 148
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 205 transition count 145
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 202 transition count 145
Performed 62 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 140 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 138 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 136 transition count 81
Applied a total of 247 rules in 26 ms. Remains 136 /268 variables (removed 132) and now considering 81/215 (removed 134) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 136 cols
[2024-05-22 00:01:53] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/268 places, 81/215 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 135 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 134 transition count 80
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 134 /135 variables (removed 1) and now considering 80/81 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 134 cols
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned [9, 43, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 129]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 204 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 115/268 places, 80/215 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 239 edges and 115 vertex of which 113 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 111 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 102 transition count 68
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 14 places
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 79 transition count 59
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 78 transition count 58
Applied a total of 53 rules in 11 ms. Remains 78 /115 variables (removed 37) and now considering 58/80 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 78 cols
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [46]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 43 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 77/268 places, 58/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 77 /77 variables (removed 0) and now considering 58/58 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 4 iterations and 365 ms. Remains : 77/268 places, 58/215 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 58 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10638663001356531340.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 00:01:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6506756346403618091.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10638663001356531340.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6506756346403618091.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.17116e+06,0.081675,7328,2,5326,5,16630,6,0,361,16811,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p76==1) + !((AF(((EF((p110==0)) * ((p108==0)||(p143==1))) * (p124==1))) + (p139!=1)))) U AF((p144==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((p144==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!((p144==1))))) U (!(((p76==1) + !((!(EG(!(((E(TRUE U (p11...258
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t4, t6, t10, t12, t16, t22, t38, t43, t45, t46, t47, t48, t50, t54, Intersection wit...236
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 00:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 00:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7103381822108054220.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7103381822108054220.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7103381822108054220.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7103381822108054220.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7103381822108054220.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 00:02:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 00:02:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 00:02:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 7 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:02:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2633258874402802556.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18191567643871501454.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2633258874402802556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18191567643871501454.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.17116e+06,0.030014,4884,427,87,2621,332,250,3679,78,786,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i3.u6.p76==1) + !((AF(((EF((i4.u13.p110==0)) * ((i3.u10.p108==0)||(i6.u15.p143==1))) * (i4.u13.p124==1))) + (u14.p139!=1)))) U AF((i6...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((i6.u15.p144==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!((i6.u15.p144==1))))) U (!(((i3.u6.p76==1) + !((!(...317
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t43, t48, t50, u2.t38, u1.t16, u14.t54, i2.t47, i2.u8.t10, i3.t46, i3.u10.t45, i3.u11.t6,...295
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,9.81162,352248,1,0,719183,1411,1288,849527,383,6069,655918
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 265 transition count 215
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 250 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 250 transition count 200
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 250 transition count 197
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 241 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 241 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 241 transition count 183
Applied a total of 59 rules in 7 ms. Remains 241 /268 variables (removed 27) and now considering 183/215 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 241 cols
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned [4, 7]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 107 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 239/268 places, 183/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 239 /239 variables (removed 0) and now considering 183/183 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 116 ms. Remains : 239/268 places, 183/215 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5610479846663905515.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 00:02:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1242885342985277153.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5610479846663905515.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1242885342985277153.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.25382e+15,28.9554,668404,2,416212,5,2.59115e+06,6,0,1140,2.72599e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 00:03:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 00:03:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11903905575720184290.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11903905575720184290.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11903905575720184290.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11903905575720184290.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11903905575720184290.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 00:03:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 00:03:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 00:03:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:03:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5892878587580881071.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14891634016544745114.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5892878587580881071.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14891634016544745114.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.25382e+15,0.437526,21820,2585,81,42399,1026,626,66786,86,3260,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(EX(((i2.u8.p48==1)||(i2.u11.p44==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(EX(((i2.u8.p48==1)||(i2.u11.p44==0)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t58, t87, t135, t177, i0.u31.t79, i0.u14.t109, i1.t123, i1.u6.t128, i1.u6.t129, i1.u...710
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 265 transition count 215
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 249 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 249 transition count 199
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 249 transition count 196
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 239 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 239 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 239 transition count 180
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 238 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 238 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 238 transition count 178
Applied a total of 67 rules in 10 ms. Remains 238 /268 variables (removed 30) and now considering 178/215 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 238 cols
[2024-05-22 00:03:34] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned [4, 7]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 117 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/268 places, 178/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 236 /236 variables (removed 0) and now considering 178/178 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 129 ms. Remains : 236/268 places, 178/215 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:03:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4636403492714720156.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 00:03:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6174560853307595696.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4636403492714720156.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6174560853307595696.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.71666e+15,24.2409,666916,2,415900,5,2.57807e+06,6,0,1123,2.72328e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 00:04:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 00:04:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12923376125812962862.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12923376125812962862.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12923376125812962862.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12923376125812962862.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12923376125812962862.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 00:04:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 00:04:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 00:04:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:04:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7746754351096429308.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16544612355280543989.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7746754351096429308.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16544612355280543989.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.71666e+15,0.362424,18612,2361,79,33411,1020,583,58339,83,3322,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(A((i8.u37.p151==1) U E(((i9.u45.p178==0)||(i9.u39.p156==1)) U ((i2.u11.p47==0)||(i11.i0.i0.u51.p196==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!((E(!(E(((i9.u45.p178==0)||(i9.u39.p156==1)) U ((i2.u11.p47==0)||(i11.i0.i0.u51.p196==1)))) U (!(...372
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t56, t87, t131, t172, i0.u31.t79, i1.t119, i1.u8.t124, i1.u8.t125, i1.u9.t121, i1.u9...708
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 482 edges and 268 vertex of which 257 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 11 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 11 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 256 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 238 transition count 191
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 238 transition count 182
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 229 transition count 182
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 217 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 217 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 217 transition count 166
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 216 transition count 166
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 216 transition count 165
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 215 transition count 165
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 208 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 208 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 208 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 207 transition count 151
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 207 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 205 transition count 149
Performed 69 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 136 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 134 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 132 transition count 78
Applied a total of 254 rules in 29 ms. Remains 132 /268 variables (removed 136) and now considering 78/215 (removed 137) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 00:04:34] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 131/268 places, 78/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 131 /131 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 116 ms. Remains : 131/268 places, 78/215 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5856506043564835423.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6859296252921325577.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5856506043564835423.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6859296252921325577.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65203e+09,1.16405,45648,2,62924,5,223275,6,0,600,186332,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((A(EG(AF((p113==1))) U (p167==0)) * (p171==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((p167==0))) * !((p167==0))) * !(EG(!(EG(!((p113==1)))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(FwdU(Init...231
(forward)formula 0,0,1.20807,45648,1,0,8,223275,9,2,605,186332,1
FORMULA DES-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 265 transition count 215
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 250 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 250 transition count 200
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 250 transition count 197
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 241 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 241 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 241 transition count 183
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 240 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 240 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 240 transition count 181
Applied a total of 62 rules in 17 ms. Remains 240 /268 variables (removed 28) and now considering 181/215 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 240 cols
[2024-05-22 00:04:36] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned [4, 7]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 114 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/268 places, 181/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 238 /238 variables (removed 0) and now considering 181/181 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 133 ms. Remains : 238/268 places, 181/215 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 181 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:04:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1141198672550351533.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:04:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6183093510945703672.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1141198672550351533.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6183093510945703672.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.57499e+15,24.395,689516,2,416250,5,2.87312e+06,6,0,1134,2.78785e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 00:05:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 00:05:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2514091709786054868.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2514091709786054868.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2514091709786054868.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2514091709786054868.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2514091709786054868.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 00:05:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 00:05:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 00:05:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:05:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:05:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3915133766841503274.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12835268944806242713.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3915133766841503274.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12835268944806242713.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.57499e+15,0.37853,18272,2938,74,35724,604,690,48752,84,1621,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((E((i4.i1.u26.p104!=0) U (i1.u11.p52==1)) * E(((i0.i0.u31.p128==0)||(i0.i0.u31.p129==1)) U EG(((i5.i1.u30.p123==0)||(i7.i0.u37.p147...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * E((i4.i1.u26.p104!=0) U (i1.u11.p52==1))),((i0.i0.u31.p128==0)||(i0.i0.u31.p12...216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t54, t56, t58, t87, t133, t175, i0.i0.u31.t79, i0.i3.u77.t17, i1.u11.t112, i1.u11.t1...740
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 265 transition count 215
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 251 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 251 transition count 201
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 251 transition count 199
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 241 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 241 transition count 189
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 241 transition count 183
Applied a total of 59 rules in 6 ms. Remains 241 /268 variables (removed 27) and now considering 183/215 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 241 cols
[2024-05-22 00:05:36] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned [4, 7]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 147 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 239/268 places, 183/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 239 /239 variables (removed 0) and now considering 183/183 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 155 ms. Remains : 239/268 places, 183/215 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:05:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:05:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3493194084509644766.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:05:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5215091569053634895.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3493194084509644766.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5215091569053634895.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.1994e+15,25.5299,730884,2,529605,5,2.77525e+06,6,0,1140,2.97072e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 00:06:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 00:06:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 00:06:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8131841093235232122.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8131841093235232122.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8131841093235232122.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8131841093235232122.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8131841093235232122.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 00:06:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 00:06:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 00:06:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:06:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 00:06:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:06:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3322801736248421520.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 00:06:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality936338547045733202.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3322801736248421520.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality936338547045733202.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.1994e+15,0.192312,12460,1573,73,20275,669,690,27370,82,1914,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(A(((i0.i1.u77.p278==0)||(i8.i0.u37.p144==1)) U EG(((i5.i0.u28.p124==0)||(i2.u59.p237==1))))) + AG(AX(((i1.u10.p40==0)||(i7.i1.u73.p2...193
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(((Init * !(EG((i10.i1.u47.p174==1)))) * !(EX(!((E(!(EG(((i5.i0.u28.p124==0)||(i2.u59.p237==1)))) U (!(...368
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t55, t59, t88, t135, t177, i0.i0.u32.t80, i0.i1.u76.t17, i1.u11.t116, i2.u59.t49, i2.u66....762
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 00:06:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 00:06:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 00:06:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 00:06:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13628297377277774860.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13628297377277774860.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13628297377277774860.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13628297377277774860.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13628297377277774860.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 00:06:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 00:06:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 00:06:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:06:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-22 00:06:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:06:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11897517877298799775.gal : 16 ms
[2024-05-22 00:06:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11480772297419200058.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11897517877298799775.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11480772297419200058.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.86627e+16,0.58324,29168,3512,67,56855,906,685,108004,93,3597,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((A(AX((i9.u74.p240==1)) U ((((i6.u35.p115==1) * EF((i11.i1.i1.u57.p185==1))) * (AF((i0.u1.p8==0)) + (i4.u12.p41==0))) + ((((((i10.u49....426
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(((((i6.u35.p115==1) * E(TRUE U (i11.i1.i1.u57.p185==1))) * (!(EG(!((i0.u1.p8==0))))...1114
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t53, t61, t94, t140, t156, t206, i0.u39.t82, i0.u85.t17, i1.t114, i1.u20.t116, i2.u8.t148, i2...793
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 00:30:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 00:30:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 00:30:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 00:30:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 00:30:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:30:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 00:30:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:30:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9644219283533298788.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 00:30:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12316019725770375906.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9644219283533298788.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12316019725770375906.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.86627e+16,17.4077,551724,57751,266,619776,1436,630,5.3354e+06,151,5498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((A(AX((i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.u97.p240==1)) U ((((i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.i1.u134.p115==1) * EF((i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0....748
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(((((i1.i0.i1.i0.i1.i1.u134.p115==1) * E(TRUE U (i1.i1.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0...1874
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t156, i1.i0.i0.u20.t114, i1.i0.i0.u20.t116, i1.i0.i0.i0.u19.t120, i1.i0.i0.i0.u19.t122, i1.i0...1856
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 137
[2024-05-22 00:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 00:38:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 215 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:38:47] [INFO ] Transformed 268 places.
[2024-05-22 00:38:47] [INFO ] Transformed 215 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2024-05-22 00:39:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5927778040650889108.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 00:39:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3341292864744774542.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5927778040650889108.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3341292864744774542.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...328
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.86627e+16,3.50988,106872,2,74061,5,458765,6,0,1280,391252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((A(AX((p240==1)) U ((((p115==1) * EF((p185==1))) * (AF((p8==0)) + (p41==0))) + ((((((p153==0)||(p259==1))&&(p20==1))||(p196==0))||((p6...287
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(((((p115==1) * E(TRUE U (p185==1))) * (!(EG(!((p8==0)))) + (p41==0))) + ((((((p153=...795
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t10, t17, t23, t25, t27, t35, t37, t40, t51, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61,...452
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 137
Total runtime 3257285 ms.

BK_STOP 1716338959773

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-01b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-01b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189700625"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-01b.tgz
mv DES-PT-01b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;