About the Execution of ITS-Tools for DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
16198.460 | 3600000.00 | 3677258.00 | 9891.20 | TFTTFF?????????? | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r092-tall-171624189400482.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189400482
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 536K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:36 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 22 14:36 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 19 07:15 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 19 18:06 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 12 12:51 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K Apr 12 12:51 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K Apr 12 12:50 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Apr 12 12:50 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:36 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:36 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2023-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716318671164
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 80 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] Transformed 553 places.
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 553 places and 150 transitions and 600 arcs in 171 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 444 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 444 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 68 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 150/150 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 99 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 99 transition count 136
Applied a total of 24 rules in 23 ms. Remains 99 /109 variables (removed 10) and now considering 136/150 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 99 cols
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 14 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 62 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 370 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 135 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:11:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 62 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 136/235 variables, 99/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 62/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 3278 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, ReadFeed: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 136/235 variables, 99/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 62/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 135/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 298 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 5458 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, ReadFeed: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8942ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8957ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/109 places, 136/150 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9368 ms. Remains : 99/109 places, 136/150 transitions.
Support contains 68 out of 99 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-21 19:11:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 66 to 63
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9268 resets) in 2227 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 30/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (402 resets) in 55 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (175 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (203 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (202 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (187 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (184 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (222 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (121 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (614 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (194 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 27/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (432 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (199 resets) in 53 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (191 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (381 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 25/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (219 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (424 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (404 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (198 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (205 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (201 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (448 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (188 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (204 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (144 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (191 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (201 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (190 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (140 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
[2024-05-21 19:11:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:11:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 62 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 23/64 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 21/85 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 131/216 variables, 85/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 57/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 19/235 variables, 14/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 5/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved in 658 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, ReadFeed: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 32/55 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/80 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 119/199 variables, 80/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 45/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 36/235 variables, 19/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 17/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 17/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved in 1233 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, ReadFeed: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/25 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1937ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 18 unsolved
Fused 18 Parikh solutions to 15 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 788 ms.
Support contains 21 out of 99 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 292 edges and 99 vertex of which 98 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 98 transition count 134
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 89 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 89 transition count 123
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 89 transition count 120
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 87 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 87 transition count 118
Applied a total of 28 rules in 34 ms. Remains 87 /99 variables (removed 12) and now considering 118/136 (removed 18) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 34 ms. Remains : 87/99 places, 118/136 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9191 resets) in 267 ms. (149 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (423 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (182 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (207 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (191 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (406 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (436 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (217 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (408 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (209 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (199 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (398 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (219 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (196 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (106 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (190 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (216 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 47144 steps, run visited all 16 properties in 261 ms. (steps per millisecond=180 )
Probabilistic random walk after 47144 steps, saw 20536 distinct states, run finished after 269 ms. (steps per millisecond=175 ) properties seen :16
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-21 19:11:26] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-21 19:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-21 19:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
Support contains 50 out of 99 places (down from 56) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 18 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 330 edges and 99 vertex of which 98 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 77 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 77 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 65 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 65 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 64 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 64 transition count 78
Applied a total of 73 rules in 10 ms. Remains 64 /99 variables (removed 35) and now considering 78/136 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-21 19:11:26] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:11:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:11:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:11:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:11:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:11:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 78/142 variables, 64/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 23/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/142 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 142/142 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 1015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 78/142 variables, 64/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 23/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 77/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/142 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 142/142 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 2087 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3165ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3166ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/99 places, 78/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3314 ms. Remains : 64/99 places, 78/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:11:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:11:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15851460611428841011.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2326798087167126371.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15851460611428841011.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2326798087167126371.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24107e+08,7.98394,192824,2,20237,5,767755,6,0,334,849730,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EF((((s1<1)||(l91<1)) * EG(((s1>=1)&&(l510>=1))))) + EG(EX((((s1<1)||(l337<1))&&((s1<1)||(l345<1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * ((s1<1)||(l91<1))),((s1>=1)&&(l510>=1)))] != FALSE + [FwdG(EY(Init),EX((((s1<1)||(...197
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/73/77
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t49, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t6...296
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:12:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13880013782978220704.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13880013782978220704.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13880013782978220704.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13880013782978220704.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13880013782978220704.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:12:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:12:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:12:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 60 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2024-05-21 19:12:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 35 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:12:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability494806233013338322.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:12:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14076482892534909369.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability494806233013338322.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14076482892534909369.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24107e+08,5.44517,125572,1725,1381,116952,28682,213,460257,112,997402,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EF((((u0.s1<1)||(i1.u1.l91<1)) * EG(((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0.l510>=1))))) + EG(EX((((u0.s1<1)||(u8.l337<1))&&((u0.s1<1)||(u2.l345<1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * ((u0.s1<1)||(i1.u1.l91<1))),((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0.l510>=1)))] != FALSE + [FwdG(EY(Init)...224
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t28, t49, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, ...290
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 80 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 80 transition count 103
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 70 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 70 transition count 91
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 68 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 87
Applied a total of 65 rules in 8 ms. Remains 68 /99 variables (removed 31) and now considering 87/136 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-21 19:12:30] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:12:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:12:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:12:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:12:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 86 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:12:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:12:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 87/155 variables, 68/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 32/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 1280 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 87/155 variables, 68/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 32/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 86/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 2753 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4096ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4098ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/99 places, 87/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4274 ms. Remains : 68/99 places, 87/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 19:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:12:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5986850628708886343.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14998754850022050084.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5986850628708886343.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14998754850022050084.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.52069e+08,14.1082,290468,2,30950,5,1.38009e+06,6,0,359,1.11714e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l340>=1))) U EG(AF(((p18>=1)&&(l115>=1))))) * EF((((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))) * EG((((s1<1)||(l15...239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU((Init * E(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l340>=1))))) U EG(!(EG(!(((p18>=1)&&(l115>=1)))))))),TRUE) * (!(EX(!(((...426
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t56, t58, t59, t60, t6...361
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:13:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:13:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11577901920797824063.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11577901920797824063.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11577901920797824063.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11577901920797824063.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11577901920797824063.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:13:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:13:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:13:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 79 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:13:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 76 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:13:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5555749090140647274.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8101585562358787367.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5555749090140647274.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8101585562358787367.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 77 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 77 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 63 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 74
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 61 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 59 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 59 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 59 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 58 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 58 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 58 transition count 64
Applied a total of 90 rules in 21 ms. Remains 58 /99 variables (removed 41) and now considering 64/136 (removed 72) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-21 19:13:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:13:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:13:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:13:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 19:13:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:13:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:13:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/122 variables, 58/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 864 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/122 variables, 58/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 63/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1491 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2398ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2399ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/99 places, 64/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2562 ms. Remains : 58/99 places, 64/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:13:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:13:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5001635801197688843.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability510743446587931206.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5001635801197688843.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability510743446587931206.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.39871e+07,2.69402,85232,2,18239,5,299149,6,0,296,378855,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(AF(((s1<1)||(l0<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((s1<1)||(l0<1))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t5...286
(forward)formula 0,1,8.72184,211460,1,0,207,1.0329e+06,158,85,2055,1.20933e+06,244
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 78 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 78 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 99
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 67 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 67 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 86
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 64 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 64 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 79
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 62 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 62 transition count 76
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 60 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 60 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 59 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 59 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 59 transition count 69
Applied a total of 88 rules in 23 ms. Remains 59 /99 variables (removed 40) and now considering 69/136 (removed 67) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 59 cols
[2024-05-21 19:13:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:13:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:13:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:13:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 19:13:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 68 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:13:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:13:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 69/128 variables, 59/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 25/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 128/128 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 882 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 69/128 variables, 59/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 25/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 68/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 128/128 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 1689 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2604ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2605ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/99 places, 69/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2747 ms. Remains : 59/99 places, 69/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:13:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:13:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1957297525481731039.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 19:13:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10528109118047681558.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1957297525481731039.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10528109118047681558.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.54079e+07,2.66845,82832,2,18047,5,299451,6,0,305,342203,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t45, t50, t51, t52, t5...331
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:14:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16603666065664217151.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16603666065664217151.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16603666065664217151.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16603666065664217151.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16603666065664217151.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:14:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:14:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:14:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 61 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:14:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 37 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:14:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4067315710871300000.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:14:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5625302394952235446.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4067315710871300000.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5625302394952235446.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.54079e+07,2.20555,61892,1329,560,73715,5585,221,351631,70,48240,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((i2.u1.s1>=1)&&(u0.l149>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((i2.u1.s1>=1)&&(u0.l149>=1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t9, t24, t45, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, ...289
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,1,24.7637,452080,1,0,559193,42188,924,2.71377e+06,409,375795,679247
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 78 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 78 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 95
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 68 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 68 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 68 transition count 84
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 66 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 66 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 65 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 64 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 64 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 63 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 63 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 63 transition count 74
Applied a total of 77 rules in 6 ms. Remains 63 /99 variables (removed 36) and now considering 74/136 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-21 19:14:43] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:14:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:14:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:14:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:14:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 73 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:14:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:14:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 74/137 variables, 63/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 21/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 989 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 74/137 variables, 63/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 21/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 73/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 1900 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2931ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2931ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/99 places, 74/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3077 ms. Remains : 63/99 places, 74/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:14:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 19:14:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:14:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:14:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:14:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:14:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability785602540785249872.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:14:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9292803347118110457.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability785602540785249872.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9292803347118110457.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.33836e+07,10.277,251416,2,23722,5,1.08397e+06,6,0,326,950633,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(E(AF(!(((p33>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) U EF(((p39>=1)&&(l137>=1))))) + AX(((s1>=1)&&(l91>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(E(!(EG(!(!(((p33>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) U E(TRUE U ((p39>=1)&&(l137>=1)))))))))) * !(((s1...181
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t44, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t6...301
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:15:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:15:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:15:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18289419072401497013.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18289419072401497013.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18289419072401497013.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18289419072401497013.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18289419072401497013.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:15:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:15:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:15:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 72 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:15:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:15:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 39 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:15:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15750461777771445359.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:15:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12250121810097469840.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15750461777771445359.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12250121810097469840.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 81 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 81 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 81 transition count 102
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 73 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 73 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 73 transition count 93
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 71 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 71 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 71 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 70 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 70 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 69 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 69 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 68 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 68 transition count 83
Applied a total of 67 rules in 21 ms. Remains 68 /99 variables (removed 31) and now considering 83/136 (removed 53) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-21 19:15:47] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:15:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:15:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:15:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:15:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 19:15:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:15:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:15:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/151 variables, 68/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 28/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 151/151 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 1239 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/151 variables, 68/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 28/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 82/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 151/151 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 2258 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3557ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3557ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/99 places, 83/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3710 ms. Remains : 68/99 places, 83/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:15:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:15:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:15:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:15:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:15:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:15:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5660754346910878798.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:15:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17090589794941553482.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5660754346910878798.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17090589794941553482.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.01676e+08,24.5058,573112,2,45512,5,1.99297e+06,6,0,355,2.60478e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:16:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 19:16:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:16:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7212404283934747393.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7212404283934747393.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7212404283934747393.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7212404283934747393.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7212404283934747393.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:16:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:16:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:16:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 84 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:16:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:16:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 57 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:16:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5649687634639371768.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:16:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1212129810211274626.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5649687634639371768.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1212129810211274626.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 78 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 78 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 78 transition count 95
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 68 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 68 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 83
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 65 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 65 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 65 transition count 76
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 63 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 73
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 61 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 61 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 61 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 60 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 68
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 60 transition count 66
Applied a total of 86 rules in 11 ms. Remains 60 /99 variables (removed 39) and now considering 66/136 (removed 70) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-21 19:16:51] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:16:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:16:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:16:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:16:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 65 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:16:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:16:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 66/126 variables, 60/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 21/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/126 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 126/126 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 810 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 66/126 variables, 60/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 21/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 65/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/126 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 126/126 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 1447 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2288ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2288ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/99 places, 66/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2429 ms. Remains : 60/99 places, 66/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:16:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:16:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:16:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:16:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:16:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:16:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10758947648062022749.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:16:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3231850943196666551.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10758947648062022749.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3231850943196666551.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.59929e+07,6.67298,188688,2,20358,5,798944,6,0,306,743452,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(E(((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1)) U EX(((s1>=1)&&(l112>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1)) U EX(((s1>=1)&&(l112>=1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t19, t29, t41, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t5...301
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:17:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:17:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:17:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18000120190224661241.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18000120190224661241.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18000120190224661241.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18000120190224661241.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18000120190224661241.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:17:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:17:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:17:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 49 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:17:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:17:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 27 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:17:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7445542973818609338.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:17:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11413831081995415116.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7445542973818609338.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11413831081995415116.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 77 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 77 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 65 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 65 transition count 80
Applied a total of 71 rules in 6 ms. Remains 65 /99 variables (removed 34) and now considering 80/136 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-21 19:17:53] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:17:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:17:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:17:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:17:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:17:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:17:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/145 variables, 65/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 23/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1075 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/145 variables, 65/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 23/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 79/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2045 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3169ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3170ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/99 places, 80/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3315 ms. Remains : 65/99 places, 80/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 19:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:17:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:17:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4223841827054071044.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:17:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8126961775706307020.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4223841827054071044.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8126961775706307020.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64311e+08,10.9941,287844,2,25256,5,1.1966e+06,6,0,340,1.31626e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((((AG(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1)))) + EX(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1)))) + (AF(((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1))) + (s1<1))) + (l338<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1)))))))) + EX(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1)))) + (!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&...203
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t51, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t7...296
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:18:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:18:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:18:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17865565074999411216.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17865565074999411216.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17865565074999411216.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17865565074999411216.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17865565074999411216.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:18:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:18:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:18:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 58 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:18:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:18:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 49 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:18:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9708211931189680808.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:18:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14508938433605176014.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9708211931189680808.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14508938433605176014.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64311e+08,23.6569,420296,1627,2227,362409,180638,218,2.26412e+06,126,1.75194e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((((AG(AF(((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0.l337>=1)))) + EX(((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0.l509>=1)))) + (AF(((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0.l337>=1))) + (u0.s1<1))) + (u0.l338<...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0.l337>=1)))))))) + EX(((u0.s1>=1)&&(u0.l509>=1)))) + (!(EG...227
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t9, t28, t51, t59, t60, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t...289
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 83 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 83 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 83 transition count 108
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 79 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 79 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 79 transition count 102
Applied a total of 45 rules in 4 ms. Remains 79 /99 variables (removed 20) and now considering 102/136 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 79 cols
[2024-05-21 19:18:57] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:18:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:18:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:18:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:18:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 101 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:18:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:18:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/181 variables, 79/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 39/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/181 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 181/181 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 1917 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/181 variables, 79/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 39/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 101/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/181 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 181/181 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 3238 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5231ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5232ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/99 places, 102/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5407 ms. Remains : 79/99 places, 102/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:19:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:19:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6143392765851288029.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:19:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10231448848492694360.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6143392765851288029.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10231448848492694360.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.25353e+08,22.8867,533536,2,31438,5,1.9229e+06,6,0,418,2.23511e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:19:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:19:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:19:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4945438402953702497.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4945438402953702497.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4945438402953702497.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4945438402953702497.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4945438402953702497.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:19:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:19:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:19:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:19:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 19:19:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 65 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:19:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2230115801413043330.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:19:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3916955373966055053.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2230115801413043330.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3916955373966055053.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 79 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 79 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 79 transition count 102
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 68 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 68 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 89
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 65 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 65 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 65 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 63 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 79
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 61 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 61 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 61 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 60 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 60 transition count 72
Applied a total of 86 rules in 21 ms. Remains 60 /99 variables (removed 39) and now considering 72/136 (removed 64) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-21 19:20:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:20:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:20:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:20:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:20:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 19:20:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:20:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:20:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/132 variables, 60/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 28/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 865 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/132 variables, 60/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 28/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 71/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 2093 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2993ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2994ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/99 places, 72/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3143 ms. Remains : 60/99 places, 72/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:20:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:20:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5854769503413880170.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:20:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2113696391532303497.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5854769503413880170.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2113696391532303497.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.67812e+07,4.10244,110828,2,17514,5,388326,6,0,312,477202,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AG((AG(((s1<1)||(l149<1))) * ((s1<1)||(l33<1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((!(E(TRUE U !(((s1<1)||(l149<1))))) * ((s1<1)||(l33<1)))))))))] = FA...158
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t42, t43, t44,...354
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:20:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18081266699821539068.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18081266699821539068.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18081266699821539068.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18081266699821539068.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18081266699821539068.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:20:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:20:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:20:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 79 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:20:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 42 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:20:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16128032912978110762.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:20:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5314799972910563155.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16128032912978110762.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5314799972910563155.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.67812e+07,8.30737,167592,3236,519,188696,6928,270,925492,49,109829,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AG((AG(((i2.u3.s1<1)||(i0.u0.l149<1))) * ((i2.u3.s1<1)||(i3.u11.l33<1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((!(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u3.s1<1)||(i0.u0.l149<1))))) * ((i2.u3.s1<1)||(i3...183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t7, t9, t24, t25, t26, t28, t29, t30, t33, t42, t43, t44, t48, t53, t54, t56, t57, t5...334
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 82 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 82 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 82 transition count 103
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 75 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 75 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 74 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 74 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 73 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 73 transition count 93
Applied a total of 54 rules in 9 ms. Remains 73 /99 variables (removed 26) and now considering 93/136 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 73 cols
[2024-05-21 19:21:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:21:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:21:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:21:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:21:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 19:21:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:21:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:21:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/166 variables, 73/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 31/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 1644 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/166 variables, 73/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 31/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 92/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 3046 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4763ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4764ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/99 places, 93/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4930 ms. Remains : 73/99 places, 93/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:21:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:21:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:21:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:21:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:21:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:21:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10760217531229224081.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:21:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4604975629789033886.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10760217531229224081.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4604975629789033886.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.60909e+08,16.2162,384296,2,28536,5,1.60807e+06,6,0,385,1.33414e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((((E(((s1>=1)&&(l486>=1)) U E(((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s8>=1)&&(l151>=1)))) + (EF(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))) * (((s1>=1)&&(l3>=1))||((s1...243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((E(((s1>=1)&&(l486>=1)) U E(((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s8>=1)&&(l151>=1)))) + (E(TRUE U ((...330
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t28, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t58, t59, t67, t68, t69, t70,...364
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:21:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:21:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:21:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2681696921042235843.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2681696921042235843.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2681696921042235843.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2681696921042235843.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2681696921042235843.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:21:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:21:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:21:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 97 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:21:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:21:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 74 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:21:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11596191003153444691.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:21:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15443066845698695525.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11596191003153444691.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15443066845698695525.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 79 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 79 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 79 transition count 96
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 71 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 71 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 71 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 70 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 70 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 70 transition count 83
Applied a total of 62 rules in 4 ms. Remains 70 /99 variables (removed 29) and now considering 83/136 (removed 53) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 70 cols
[2024-05-21 19:22:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:22:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:22:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/153 variables, 70/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 24/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 1324 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/153 variables, 70/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 24/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 82/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 2340 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3712ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3713ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/99 places, 83/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3853 ms. Remains : 70/99 places, 83/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:22:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:22:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4988718315281105039.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 19:22:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14207396532229486150.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4988718315281105039.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14207396532229486150.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.57159e+08,15.9046,372180,2,30417,5,1.1941e+06,6,0,363,2.04297e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(E(EF(((p10>=1)&&(l153>=1))) U EG(A(((s1>=1)&&(l501>=1)) U ((p25>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) + EX(((s1>=1)&&(l490>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(E(TRUE U ((p10>=1)&&(l153>=1))) U EG(!((E(!(((p25>=1)&&(l0>=1))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l501>=...290
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t48, t49, t51, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t6...326
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 19:22:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13284816165724797769.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13284816165724797769.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13284816165724797769.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13284816165724797769.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13284816165724797769.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:22:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:22:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:22:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 84 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:22:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:22:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12758812305358709114.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:22:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14030217871392900641.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12758812305358709114.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14030217871392900641.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 80 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 80 transition count 105
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 71 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 71 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 70 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 69 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 69 transition count 93
Applied a total of 61 rules in 4 ms. Remains 69 /99 variables (removed 30) and now considering 93/136 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 69 cols
[2024-05-21 19:23:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 19:23:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:23:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:23:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:23:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:23:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:23:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/162 variables, 69/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 35/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 1376 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/162 variables, 69/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 35/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 92/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 3082 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4513ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4514ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/99 places, 93/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4647 ms. Remains : 69/99 places, 93/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:23:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:23:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10901196115109652551.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 19:23:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11370839001404147352.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10901196115109652551.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11370839001404147352.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.25302e+08,17.2863,401224,2,23721,5,1.53628e+06,6,0,369,1.58763e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(AG(((s1<1)||(l150<1)))) + ((((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l338>=1)))&&(((s1<1)||(l509<1))||((l336<1)||((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1<1)||(l150<1)))))))) + ((((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l338>=1)))&&(((s...218
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t51, t52, t53, t60, t6...376
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:23:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8123445107465540796.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8123445107465540796.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8123445107465540796.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8123445107465540796.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8123445107465540796.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:23:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:23:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:23:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 67 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:23:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 47 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:23:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2206153978108101152.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:23:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10350645479672037905.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2206153978108101152.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10350645479672037905.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 81 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 81 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 81 transition count 104
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 73 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 73 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 73 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 72 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 72 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 71 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 71 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 70 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 70 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 70 transition count 87
Applied a total of 65 rules in 2 ms. Remains 70 /99 variables (removed 29) and now considering 87/136 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 70 cols
[2024-05-21 19:24:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:24:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:24:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:24:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:24:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 86 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:24:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:24:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 87/157 variables, 70/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 33/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/157 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 157/157 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 1357 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 87/157 variables, 70/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 33/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 86/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/157 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 157/157 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 2379 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3796ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3797ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/99 places, 87/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3937 ms. Remains : 70/99 places, 87/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:24:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:24:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:24:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:24:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:24:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:24:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16008031143110910733.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:24:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7668675434581794797.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16008031143110910733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7668675434581794797.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.08911e+08,8.22503,218652,2,22259,5,767710,6,0,367,982351,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG(!(A(!(((s1<1)||(l91<1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l32>=1))))) * ((s1<1)||(l339<1))) + ((EX(AF(((s1<1)||(l150<1)))) * AF(((s1>=1)&&(l484>=1)))...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l32>=1))) U (!(!(((s1<1)||(l91<1)))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l32>=1))))) ...347
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t55, t58, t59, t60, t6...366
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:24:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:24:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:24:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5471167857294242473.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5471167857294242473.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5471167857294242473.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5471167857294242473.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5471167857294242473.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:24:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:24:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:24:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 89 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:24:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:24:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 63 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:24:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17586669830713614507.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:24:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9932441168116971394.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17586669830713614507.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9932441168116971394.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 80 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 80 transition count 103
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 70 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 70 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 70 transition count 91
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 68 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 68 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 87
Applied a total of 65 rules in 6 ms. Remains 68 /99 variables (removed 31) and now considering 87/136 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-21 19:25:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 19:25:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:25:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:25:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:25:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 86 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:25:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:25:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 87/155 variables, 68/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 31/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 1227 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, ReadFeed: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 87/155 variables, 68/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 31/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 86/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 2726 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, ReadFeed: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4001ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4002ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/99 places, 87/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4126 ms. Remains : 68/99 places, 87/136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:25:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:25:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17712492570111455737.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 19:25:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13016427584090074685.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17712492570111455737.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13016427584090074685.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.49533e+08,14.705,380932,2,32819,5,1.5705e+06,6,0,359,1.64585e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A((AF(E(((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l335>=1)))) + AF(!((((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1)))))) U ((!(E(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l335...377
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (EG((((s1<1)||(l91<1)) * EX(((s1>=1)&&(l510>=1))))) + ((!((E(!((((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1))||...1400
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t55, t64, t6...361
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:25:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:25:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:25:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5340269285402084777.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5340269285402084777.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5340269285402084777.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5340269285402084777.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5340269285402084777.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:25:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:25:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:25:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 75 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:25:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:25:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 47 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:25:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13902318458333752354.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:25:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10909263258893123105.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13902318458333752354.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10909263258893123105.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.49533e+08,7.06556,133540,2088,1162,155546,22530,229,270397,93,145630,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A((AF(E(((i1.u1.s1>=1)&&(u10.l339>=1)) U ((i1.u1.s1>=1)&&(i5.u8.l335>=1)))) + AF(!((((i1.u1.s1>=1)&&(u7.l149>=1))||((i1.u1.s1>=1)&&(i1....517
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (EG((((i1.u1.s1<1)||(u7.l91<1)) * EX(((i1.u1.s1>=1)&&(i1.u1.l510>=1))))) + ((!((E(!(((...1866
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t9, t11, t30, t55, t65, t66, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76, t77, t78, t...310
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:26:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5034985944465253265.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5034985944465253265.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5034985944465253265.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5034985944465253265.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5034985944465253265.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:26:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:26:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:26:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 126 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 19:26:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 109 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:26:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18354509220137632085.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:26:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7907173947654788498.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18354509220137632085.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7907173947654788498.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 137
[2024-05-21 19:36:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 19:36:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4526253763106576517.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:36:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8075392736811930986.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4526253763106576517.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8075392736811930986.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.57703e+09,105.11,2010512,2,131525,5,7.94234e+06,6,0,532,5.54865e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EF((((s1<1)||(l91<1)) * EG(((s1>=1)&&(l510>=1))))) + EG(EX((((s1<1)||(l337<1))&&((s1<1)||(l345<1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * ((s1<1)||(l91<1))),((s1>=1)&&(l510>=1)))] != FALSE + [FwdG(EY(Init),EX((((s1<1)||(...197
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/130/134
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t19, t21, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35,...576
(forward)formula 0,1,730.153,4183496,1,0,436,1.8484e+07,13,206,1716,2.34284e+07,124
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: (E(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l340>=1))) U EG(AF(((p18>=1)&&(l115>=1))))) * EF((((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))) * EG((((s1<1)||(l15...239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU((Init * E(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l340>=1))))) U EG(!(EG(!(((p18>=1)&&(l115>=1)))))))),TRUE) * (!(EX(!(((...426
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,0,1256.05,5429868,1,0,436,3.62357e+07,38,206,1994,2.41794e+07,193
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: (AG(E(AF(!(((p33>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) U EF(((p39>=1)&&(l137>=1))))) + AX(((s1>=1)&&(l91>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(E(!(EG(!(!(((p33>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) U E(TRUE U ((p39>=1)&&(l137>=1)))))))))) * !(((s1...181
(forward)formula 2,0,1493.32,6047320,1,0,436,3.90835e+07,15,206,2081,2.54135e+07,87
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 20:01:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 20:01:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:01:34] [INFO ] Transformed 99 places.
[2024-05-21 20:01:34] [INFO ] Transformed 136 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2024-05-21 20:01:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15232769404452587021.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 20:01:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4287287758408872116.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15232769404452587021.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4287287758408872116.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.57703e+09,534.056,3268936,2,86827,5,1.8883e+07,6,0,532,6.11598e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(((EF(((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1))) * (s1>=1)) * (l487>=1))) * (p33>=1)) * (l0>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))) U (EG((((p12>=1)&&(l0>=1)) ...286
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(((E(TRUE U ((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1))) * (s1>=1)) * (l487>=1))) * (p33>=1)) * (l0>=1))) + ((s...483
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t19, t21, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35,...576
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189400482"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;