fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r092-tall-171624189400481
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
1154.819 84840.00 100744.00 193.20 FFFTFFFFFTFTFTTT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r092-tall-171624189400481.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189400481
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 536K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:36 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 22 14:36 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 19 07:15 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 19 18:06 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 12 12:51 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K Apr 12 12:51 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K Apr 12 12:50 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Apr 12 12:50 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:36 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:36 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716318585223

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] Transformed 553 places.
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 553 places and 150 transitions and 600 arcs in 167 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 16 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 444 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 444 places and 0 transitions.
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 11 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 150/150 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 139
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 82 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 82 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 82 transition count 103
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 74 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 74 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 74 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 73 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 73 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 73 transition count 90
Applied a total of 80 rules in 40 ms. Remains 73 /109 variables (removed 36) and now considering 90/150 (removed 60) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 73 cols
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 193 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 371 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 89 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:09:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/163 variables, 73/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 30/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/163 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 163/163 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 1676 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/163 variables, 73/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 30/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 89/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/163 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 163/163 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 2771 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4606ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4620ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/109 places, 90/150 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5048 ms. Remains : 73/109 places, 90/150 transitions.
Support contains 11 out of 73 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-21 19:09:51] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2024-05-21 19:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:51] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-21 19:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
Support contains 5 out of 73 places (down from 11) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9172 resets) in 785 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (4120 resets) in 294 ms. (135 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (4014 resets) in 164 ms. (242 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3997 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/30 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/53 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/125 variables, 53/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 12/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 36/161 variables, 19/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 17/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 2/163 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/163 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 163/163 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 64 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 28/30 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/53 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/125 variables, 53/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 12/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 36/161 variables, 19/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 17/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 2/163 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/163 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 163/163 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 66 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 137ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 24 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 73 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 90/90 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 217 edges and 73 vertex of which 72 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 72 transition count 89
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 67 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 67 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 65 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 64 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 64 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 63 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 63 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 63 transition count 74
Applied a total of 22 rules in 20 ms. Remains 63 /73 variables (removed 10) and now considering 74/90 (removed 16) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 20 ms. Remains : 63/73 places, 74/90 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9180 resets) in 179 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (4148 resets) in 50 ms. (784 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 20971 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 48 ms. (steps per millisecond=436 )
Probabilistic random walk after 20971 steps, saw 9383 distinct states, run finished after 51 ms. (steps per millisecond=411 ) properties seen :1
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 4 simplifications.
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 11 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 239 edges and 73 vertex of which 72 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 67 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 67 transition count 80
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 64 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 64 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 62 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 62 transition count 73
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 60 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 60 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 60 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 59 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 59 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 58 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 58 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 58 transition count 64
Applied a total of 34 rules in 10 ms. Remains 58 /73 variables (removed 15) and now considering 64/90 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:09:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/122 variables, 58/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 841 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/122 variables, 58/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 63/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1365 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2250ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2251ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/73 places, 64/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2388 ms. Remains : 58/73 places, 64/90 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:09:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6148580433155199189.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13629052241405810100.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6148580433155199189.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13629052241405810100.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.39871e+07,2.53863,86012,2,18239,5,299149,6,0,296,378855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,2.54031,86268,1,0,6,299149,7,1,403,378855,1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 68 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 68 transition count 83
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 66 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 66 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 65 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 64 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 64 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 64 transition count 75
Applied a total of 20 rules in 9 ms. Remains 64 /73 variables (removed 9) and now considering 75/90 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-21 19:09:57] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:09:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:09:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:09:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:09:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:09:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:09:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 75/139 variables, 64/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 25/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 1005 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 75/139 variables, 64/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 25/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 74/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 1923 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2978ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2979ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/73 places, 75/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3131 ms. Remains : 64/73 places, 75/90 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:10:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:10:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17998340997974859352.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16767090684119290468.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17998340997974859352.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16767090684119290468.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19909e+08,4.65571,135892,2,15745,5,575268,6,0,331,570414,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(((l504<2)&&(l137<2))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(((l504<2)&&(l137<2))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,4.9264,135892,1,0,9,575268,9,2,688,570414,2
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 67 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 67 transition count 80
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 64 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 64 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 62 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 62 transition count 73
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 60 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 60 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 60 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 59 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 59 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 58 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 58 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 58 transition count 64
Applied a total of 34 rules in 5 ms. Remains 58 /73 variables (removed 15) and now considering 64/90 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-21 19:10:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:10:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:10:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:10:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:10:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:10:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/122 variables, 58/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 823 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/122 variables, 58/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 63/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1338 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2197ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2198ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/73 places, 64/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2315 ms. Remains : 58/73 places, 64/90 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16565885048861116644.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12339843922108370252.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16565885048861116644.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12339843922108370252.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.39871e+07,2.63591,86084,2,18239,5,299149,6,0,296,378855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,2.63754,86084,1,0,6,299149,7,1,403,378855,1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 90/90 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 68 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 68 transition count 81
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 66 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 66 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 65 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 64 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 64 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 63 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 62 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 62 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 62 transition count 72
Applied a total of 24 rules in 17 ms. Remains 62 /73 variables (removed 11) and now considering 72/90 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-21 19:10:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:10:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:10:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:10:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 19:10:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:10:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:10:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/134 variables, 62/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 21/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 923 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/134 variables, 62/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 21/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 71/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1595 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2558ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2559ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/73 places, 72/90 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2686 ms. Remains : 62/73 places, 72/90 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6207122456791949468.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3655587216384465073.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6207122456791949468.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3655587216384465073.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.28246e+07,7.89303,202480,2,22668,5,742177,6,0,320,855674,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AG((p37<=0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U !((p37<=0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t43, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t6...296
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph757363508704165746.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph757363508704165746.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph757363508704165746.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph757363508704165746.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph757363508704165746.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:10:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:10:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:10:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 61 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 51 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:10:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality432579566788857203.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:10:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18231515400649202949.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality432579566788857203.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18231515400649202949.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.28246e+07,4.95876,94904,2575,1068,128087,13812,235,242754,95,167883,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AG((i4.u0.p37<=0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U !((i4.u0.p37<=0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t9, t24, t43, t51, t52, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t...290
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
(forward)formula 0,1,26.289,361848,1,0,290253,115314,948,2.17035e+06,576,1.63345e+06,482551
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-21 19:11:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 19:11:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 83714 ms.

BK_STOP 1716318670063

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189400481"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m10 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;