fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r092-tall-171624189300449
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
572.951 24740.00 41182.00 126.20 TTFFTFFTFTFTFFFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r092-tall-171624189300449.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189300449
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 536K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:35 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 22 14:35 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 22 14:35 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 22 14:35 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.5K Apr 12 12:50 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K Apr 12 12:50 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K Apr 12 12:49 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K Apr 12 12:49 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:35 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:35 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716317496205

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 76 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] Transformed 553 places.
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 553 places and 150 transitions and 600 arcs in 168 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 444 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 444 places and 0 transitions.
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 9 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 150/150 transitions.
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 103 transition count 146
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 82 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 82 transition count 107
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 73 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 73 transition count 98
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 71 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 71 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 71 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 70 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 70 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 69 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 69 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 69 transition count 88
Applied a total of 81 rules in 39 ms. Remains 69 /109 variables (removed 40) and now considering 88/150 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 69 cols
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 352 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 87 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 18:51:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 88/156 variables, 68/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 34/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/157 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
[2024-05-21 18:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 18:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 2/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
[2024-05-21 18:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/157 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/157 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 157/157 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 3662 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 88/156 variables, 68/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 34/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 75/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/157 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 12/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/157 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 157/157 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 3512 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 7303ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7314ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/109 places, 88/150 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7730 ms. Remains : 69/109 places, 88/150 transitions.
Support contains 9 out of 69 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:45] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 3 formulas.
[2024-05-21 18:51:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:45] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-21 18:51:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
Support contains 5 out of 69 places (down from 9) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9181 resets) in 895 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (4009 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (8000 resets) in 135 ms. (294 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (4004 resets) in 161 ms. (246 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (4084 resets) in 126 ms. (314 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/29 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 19/48 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 64/112 variables, 48/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 39/151 variables, 18/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 21/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 6/157 variables, 3/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 3/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/157 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 157/157 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 68 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/4 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 9/13 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/71 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 6/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 21/92 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 21/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 20/112 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 8/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 41/153 variables, 27/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 26/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 4/157 variables, 2/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 2/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/157 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 157/157 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 68 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 142ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 9 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 69 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 88/88 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 205 edges and 69 vertex of which 68 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 65 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 63 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 63 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 62 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 62 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 61 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 60 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 60 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 59 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 59 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 59 transition count 67
Applied a total of 26 rules in 26 ms. Remains 59 /69 variables (removed 10) and now considering 67/88 (removed 21) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 26 ms. Remains : 59/69 places, 67/88 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9227 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (4071 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 3966 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=247 )
Probabilistic random walk after 3966 steps, saw 1787 distinct states, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=208 ) properties seen :1
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 3 simplifications.
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 12 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 227 edges and 69 vertex of which 67 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 88/88 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 64 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 64 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 62 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 62 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 62 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 61 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 61 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 60 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 60 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 59 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 59 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 58 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 58 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 58 transition count 64
Applied a total of 29 rules in 15 ms. Remains 58 /69 variables (removed 11) and now considering 64/88 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 18:51:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/122 variables, 58/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 855 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/122 variables, 58/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 63/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1398 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2294ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2295ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/69 places, 64/88 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2435 ms. Remains : 58/69 places, 64/88 transitions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5486605913269225237.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8634500962919792679.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5486605913269225237.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8634500962919792679.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,133604,0.279308,15216,2,4969,5,44105,6,0,296,44127,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.280548,15216,1,0,6,44105,7,1,403,44127,1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 88/88 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 66 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 66 transition count 79
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 64 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 64 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 64 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 63 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 62 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 62 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 61 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 60 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 60 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 60 transition count 68
Applied a total of 24 rules in 12 ms. Remains 60 /69 variables (removed 9) and now considering 68/88 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-21 18:51:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 18:51:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 18:51:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 18:51:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 67 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 18:51:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/128 variables, 60/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 128/128 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 903 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/128 variables, 60/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 67/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 128/128 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 1566 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2508ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2508ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/69 places, 68/88 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2638 ms. Remains : 60/69 places, 68/88 transitions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8180748613894611997.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8969193456830548491.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8180748613894611997.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8969193456830548491.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,139978,0.407166,20632,2,5790,5,65815,6,0,308,58784,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF((l497<=0)) * AX((p12<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!((l497<=0)))) * !(EX(!((p12<1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t41, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t5...296
(forward)formula 0,1,3.19159,104992,1,0,396,430487,165,218,2098,525809,400
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 88/88 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 64 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 64 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 62 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 62 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 62 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 61 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 61 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 60 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 60 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 59 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 59 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 58 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 58 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 58 transition count 64
Applied a total of 29 rules in 13 ms. Remains 58 /69 variables (removed 11) and now considering 64/88 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-21 18:51:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 18:51:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 18:51:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 18:51:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 18:51:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/122 variables, 58/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 845 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/122 variables, 58/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 63/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1477 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2356ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2357ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/69 places, 64/88 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2487 ms. Remains : 58/69 places, 64/88 transitions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2024-05-21 18:51:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12265446751254852250.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 18:51:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5100065784811890250.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12265446751254852250.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5100065784811890250.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,133604,0.264827,15292,2,4969,5,44105,6,0,296,44127,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EX(EG((l153>=2)))) + AF(((AX(FALSE) * EF(EX(TRUE))) + EX(TRUE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EG(!(EX(EG((l153>=2)))))))),!(((!(EX(!(FALSE))) * E(TRUE U EX(TRUE))) + EX(TRUE))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t5...286
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,3.28277,115408,1,0,283,563556,165,145,2100,528037,330
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-21 18:52:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 18:52:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 23610 ms.

BK_STOP 1716317520945

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r092-tall-171624189300449"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;