About the Execution of 2023-gold for ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
459.995 | 15906.00 | 25865.00 | 540.00 | FFFFTFFTFTTFTFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r087-tall-171620521800262.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool gold2023
Input is ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r087-tall-171620521800262
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 468K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 22 14:33 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 22 14:33 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 22 14:33 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 22 14:33 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 23:08 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 120K Apr 12 23:08 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K Apr 12 23:08 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K Apr 12 23:08 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 22 14:33 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:33 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716253086603
bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=gold2023
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202304061127
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 22 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Transformed 25 places.
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Transformed 18 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 25 places and 18 transitions and 54 arcs in 81 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 22 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 25 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 188 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 34 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 233 ms. Remains : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Support contains 22 out of 25 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10015 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 35 ms. (steps per millisecond=286 ) properties (out of 29) seen :28
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=476 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
[2024-05-21 00:58:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:58:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-21 00:58:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-21 00:58:09] [INFO ] After 42ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0
Fused 1 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||X((p1&&X(F(p0))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 2 ms. Remains 22 /25 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:09] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /21 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 422 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 2}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=4, aps=[p0:(LEQ 2 s19), p1:(LEQ s17 s4)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24849 reset in 259 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 25491 steps with 6313 reset with depth 20 and stack size 20 in 40 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-01 finished in 835 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0||X(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /25 variables (removed 4) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:10] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 24 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 27 ms. Remains : 20/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(GT s15 s17), p1:(GT 1 s16)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null][false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6 reset in 217 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 21521 steps with 1 reset with depth 16701 and stack size 16701 in 47 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 430 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 22 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 18 transition count 14
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 18 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 15 transition count 11
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 13 transition count 9
Applied a total of 21 rules in 11 ms. Remains 13 /25 variables (removed 12) and now considering 9/18 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 13 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:10] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [8]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 12/25 places, 9/18 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 12 transition count 7
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 10 transition count 7
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 10 /12 variables (removed 2) and now considering 7/9 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 10 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:10] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:58:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:58:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 10/25 places, 7/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 105 ms. Remains : 10/25 places, 7/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 121 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GT s7 s8) (GT 2 s4))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3500 reset in 131 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 327 steps with 11 reset with depth 29 and stack size 29 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 380 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0&&(p1 U (p2&&X(X(p3))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /25 variables (removed 4) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:11] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 49 ms. Remains : 20/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 543 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(OR (AND p2 p0) (AND p0 p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p2 p0 p1), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p2 p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(OR (AND p2 p0) (AND p0 p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND p2 p0 p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND p2 p1), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(OR (AND p2 p0 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3))), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p2 p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p2 p0 p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p2 p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(OR (AND p2 p0 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3))), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 4}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p2 p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND p2 p0 p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=7 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=7 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=7 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND p2 p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=7 dest: 7}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(LEQ 1 s13), p0:(LEQ s4 s18), p1:(GT 2 s18), p3:(LEQ 2 s19)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8373 reset in 88 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8493 reset in 101 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1 p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p2 p1))), (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 p1))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1)), (X (OR (AND p2 p0) (AND p0 p1))), (X (AND (NOT p2) p1)), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p2 p0 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (OR (AND p2 p0) (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 28 factoid took 272 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 36 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 36 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 436 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3)]
Finished random walk after 292 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 18 properties in 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1 p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p2 p1))), (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 p1))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1)), (X (OR (AND p2 p0) (AND p0 p1))), (X (AND (NOT p2) p1)), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p2 p0 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (OR (AND p2 p0) (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (AND p2 p1)), (F (AND p2 (NOT p1))), (F (OR (AND p0 p2 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3)))), (F (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3))), (F (AND p0 p2 p1)), (F (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (F (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))), (F (AND p0 p2 p1 (NOT p3))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (F (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (F (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (F (NOT (OR (AND p0 p2) (AND p0 p1)))), (F (AND p2 p1 (NOT p3))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (F (AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (F (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3))), (F (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 28 factoid took 1010 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 36 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 36 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 393 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 436 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3)]
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 20 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 17/17/17 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] Added : 9 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 14 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Support contains 4 out of 20 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 20/20 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:58:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 32 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 100 ms. Remains : 20/20 places, 18/18 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p2) p1 p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p2 p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)), (X (AND (NOT p2) p1)), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (OR (AND p0 p2) (AND p0 p1))), (X (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p2 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (OR (AND p0 p2) (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 28 factoid took 273 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 36 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 36 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 436 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3)]
Finished random walk after 1760 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 18 properties in 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=117 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p2) p1 p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p2 p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)), (X (AND (NOT p2) p1)), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (OR (AND p0 p2) (AND p0 p1))), (X (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p2 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (OR (AND p0 p2) (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (AND p2 p1)), (F (AND p2 (NOT p1))), (F (OR (AND p0 p2 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3)))), (F (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3))), (F (AND p0 p2 p1)), (F (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (F (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))), (F (AND p0 p2 p1 (NOT p3))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (F (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (F (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (F (NOT (OR (AND p0 p2) (AND p0 p1)))), (F (AND p2 p1 (NOT p3))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (F (AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (F (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3))), (F (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 28 factoid took 913 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 36 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 36 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 414 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 400 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3)]
[2024-05-21 00:58:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:58:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-21 00:58:17] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-21 00:58:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-21 00:58:17] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-21 00:58:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-21 00:58:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-21 00:58:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-21 00:58:17] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 17/17/17 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 00:58:17] [INFO ] Added : 9 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 13 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 379 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8428 reset in 126 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8413 reset in 98 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin9946722738463955715
[2024-05-21 00:58:18] [INFO ] Built C files in 2ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin9946722738463955715
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9946722738463955715;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 227 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9946722738463955715;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin9946722738463955715;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased16003285842733978534.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 430 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 7715 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X((X(p0)&&F(p1)))&&G((p2||X((G(p3) U (p2&&G(p3))))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /25 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:18] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 43 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /21 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 278 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), true, (NOT p3)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-08 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) p3), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p3), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND p2 p3), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(NOT p3), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 6}, { cond=p3, acceptance={} source=7 dest: 7}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(LEQ 2 s4), p1:(LEQ 2 s17), p3:(LEQ s18 s7), p0:(LEQ s10 s1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 46 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 344 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((G(p0) U p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /25 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:19] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 21 /21 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 43 ms. Remains : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 168 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-10 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(OR (LEQ s13 s16) (LEQ 3 s5)), p0:(LEQ 3 s19)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 65 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 77 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to conjunction of knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 95 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-10 finished in 461 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(((p1 U (G((p1||G(!p2)))||(p3&&(p1||G(!p2)))))||p0)))'
Support contains 6 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 21 /25 variables (removed 4) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:19] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 37 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 20/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 325 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), p2]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=p2, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=1, aps=[p1:(LEQ 1 s18), p2:(AND (LEQ s10 s17) (LEQ 1 s18)), p3:(GT s8 s0), p0:(OR (GT s5 s17) (GT s8 s0))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 58 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 386 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((F(p0)&&(p1||G(p2))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 18
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 23 /25 variables (removed 2) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:20] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 63 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 66 ms. Remains : 22/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-12 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1 p2), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p2), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(GT 1 s16), p2:(LEQ 3 s1), p0:(AND (OR (GT 1 s16) (GT 2 s18)) (GT 3 s1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 62 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 81 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p2) p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to conjunction of knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 10 factoid took 114 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 500 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((F(p0) U p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 21 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 13
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 13 transition count 10
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 11 transition count 8
Applied a total of 24 rules in 9 ms. Remains 11 /25 variables (removed 14) and now considering 8/18 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 11 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:20] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned [8]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 10/25 places, 8/18 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 10 transition count 6
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 8 transition count 6
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 8 /10 variables (removed 2) and now considering 6/8 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 8 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:20] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:58:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:58:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 22 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 53 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 8/25 places, 6/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 112 ms. Remains : 8/25 places, 6/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-13 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(GT 3 s2), p0:(LEQ 3 s4)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 998 reset in 88 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 572 steps with 5 reset with depth 89 and stack size 89 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-13 finished in 306 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(((p0&&G(p1)) U (G((p0&&G(p1)))||(p0&&X(!p0)&&G(p1)))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 0 ms. Remains 22 /25 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:20] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 21 /21 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-14 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0, 1} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p1 p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0, 1} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={1} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p1 p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}]], initial=3, aps=[p1:(GT 1 s8), p0:(GT 2 s16)], nbAcceptance=2, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 12200 steps with 0 reset in 25 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-14 finished in 236 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(!p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /25 variables (removed 4) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2024-05-21 00:58:21] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:58:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 80 ms. Remains : 20/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 210 ms :[true, p0, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-15 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(LEQ 3 s12)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 37 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0-LTLCardinality-15 finished in 331 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 13097 ms.
BK_STOP 1716253102509
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202304061127.jar
+ VERSION=202304061127
+ echo 'Running Version 202304061127'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="gold2023"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool gold2023"
echo " Input is ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r087-tall-171620521800262"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0.tgz
mv ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P0 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;