Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r070-tall-171620505400226.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is CSRepetitions-PT-02, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r070-tall-171620505400226
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 736K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 12 09:39 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K Apr 12 09:39 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 12 09:35 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K Apr 12 09:35 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K Apr 22 14:32 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 31K Apr 22 14:32 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K Apr 22 14:32 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 22 14:32 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Apr 12 09:43 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 124K Apr 12 09:43 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 39K Apr 12 09:42 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 218K Apr 12 09:42 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:32 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.7K Apr 22 14:32 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716273546198

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=CSRepetitions-PT-02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 43 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] Transformed 23 places.
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] Transformed 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 23 places and 28 transitions and 92 arcs in 143 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 17 ms.
Support contains 23 out of 23 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 189 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 296 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 333 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 266 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 647ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 656ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 975 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Support contains 23 out of 23 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 43 to 39
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2265 resets) in 1180 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 2/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (922 resets) in 429 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (392 resets) in 136 ms. (292 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 17/51 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 16 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 27ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 199 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 195 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 407ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 408ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 475 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5260220468189660625.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1885938418450853459.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5260220468189660625.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1885938418450853459.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.023374,4028,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(A(!((((RequestBuffer_4>=1)||(RequestBuffer_1>=1))||((RequestBuffer_3>=1)||(RequestBuffer_2>=1)))) U ((((AG((((((RequestBuffer_2>=1)...2256
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(((((!(E(TRUE U !((((((RequestBuffer_2>=1)&&(Server_Waiting_2>=1))||((Server...8509
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.341186,17244,1,0,302,79280,107,183,891,94652,340
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 190 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 224 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 429ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 430ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 510 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15676452554976174827.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16833186391590948551.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15676452554976174827.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16833186391590948551.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.014891,4104,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(E(!(AF(((((Client_Sending_4>=1)&&(RequestBufferSlots>=1))||((Client_Sending_1>=1)&&(RequestBufferSlots>=1)))||(((Client_Sending_2>=...1295
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(!(!(EG(!(((((Client_Sending_4>=1)&&(RequestBufferSlots>=1))||((Client_Sending...1371
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,1,0.290137,16636,1,0,233,75596,93,127,863,91033,251
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 202 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 195 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 405ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 406ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 475 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14125506093384218125.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6281213118724446328.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14125506093384218125.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6281213118724446328.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.020809,4092,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG((((((Client_Sending_1>=1)&&(Server_Anwering_1_1>=1))||((Client_Sending_4>=1)&&(Server_Anwering_4_2>=1)))||(((Client_Sending_2>=1)&...2653
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG((((((Client_Sending_1>=1)&&(Server_Anwering_1_1>=1))||((Client_Sending_4>=1)&&(Server_Anwering_...3374
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,0,0.180652,11220,1,0,222,45817,102,113,877,51525,245
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 15 transition count 24
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 9 transition count 18
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 9 transition count 18
Applied a total of 24 rules in 20 ms. Remains 9 /23 variables (removed 14) and now considering 18/28 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 9 cols
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 46 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 14 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 18/26 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/27 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 27/27 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 88 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 9/9 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 18/26 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 14/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/27 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 27/27 variables, and 25 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 92 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 9/9 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 184ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 184ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 9/23 places, 18/28 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 256 ms. Remains : 9/23 places, 18/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11081096434471429295.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6718759653975402410.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11081096434471429295.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6718759653975402410.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,84,0.003507,3408,2,20,5,181,6,0,53,171,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((((AG(EF((((RequestBuffer_4<1)&&(RequestBuffer_1<1))&&((RequestBuffer_3<1)&&(RequestBuffer_2<1))))) * ((RequestBuffer_2<1)||(Serve...502
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((((!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (((RequestBuffer_4<1)&&(RequestBuffer_1<1))&&((RequestBuffer_3<1...570
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t12, t15, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inter...177
(forward)formula 0,1,0.011014,3988,1,0,49,949,67,27,367,1107,56
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 58 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 199 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 188 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 405ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 406ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 466 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16910600082045558624.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12918754061349664630.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16910600082045558624.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12918754061349664630.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.01455,4100,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(E(!((((RequestBuffer_4>=1)||(RequestBuffer_1>=1))||((RequestBuffer_3>=1)||(RequestBuffer_2>=1)))) U (((((RequestBuffer_2>=1)&&(Serv...3972
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((((EX((((Client_Waiting_4<1)&&(Client_Waiting_2<1))&&((Client_Waiting_3<1)&&(Client_Wait...4047
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,1,0.120233,8852,1,0,124,30453,94,55,834,35489,116
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 189 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 176 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 371ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 371ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 423 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17426289043728972280.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13051053763991596654.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17426289043728972280.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13051053763991596654.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.01605,4096,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((E(AG((((((RequestBuffer_2>=1)&&(Server_Waiting_2>=1))||((Server_Waiting_1>=1)&&(RequestBuffer_3>=1)))||(((RequestBuffer_1>=1)&&(Serv...1763
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (E(!(E(TRUE U !((((((RequestBuffer_2>=1)&&(Server_Waiting_2>=1))||((Server_Waiting_1>=1)&&(...1863
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,0,0.151479,10148,1,0,121,38052,87,52,858,42286,115
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 54 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 177 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 187 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 370ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 370ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 431 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4654811053179938090.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2778902869681873006.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4654811053179938090.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2778902869681873006.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.019978,4100,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A((AF(((((((RequestBuffer_2>=1)&&(Server_Waiting_2>=1))||((Server_Waiting_1>=1)&&(RequestBuffer_3>=1)))||(((RequestBuffer_1>=1)&&(Serve...1578
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((((((Client_Sending_1>=1)&&(Server_Anwering_1_1>=1))||((Client_Sending_4>=1)&&(Server_Anwer...2525
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,0,0.173519,11492,1,0,201,47720,94,94,850,49388,219
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 48 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 182 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 192 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 392ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 393ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 442 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14369225758818520946.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability674046680845424071.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14369225758818520946.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability674046680845424071.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.018087,4100,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((((Client_Waiting_4<1)&&(Client_Waiting_2<1))&&((Client_Waiting_3<1)&&(Client_Waiting_1<1))) * (((AF((((RequestBuffer_4<1)&&(Request...2141
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((EY(Init) * (((Client_Waiting_4<1)&&(Client_Waiting_2<1))&&((Client_Waiting_3<1)&&(Client_Waiting_1<1)))) *...3462
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,0,0.264085,15136,1,0,248,68381,94,116,876,78105,280
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 206 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 219 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 439ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 439ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 507 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4081651675027549189.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9492182091850545935.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4081651675027549189.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9492182091850545935.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.026397,4096,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EX((RequestBuffer_4>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX((RequestBuffer_4>=1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,0,0.073751,6208,1,0,94,16784,77,38,792,17044,78
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 209 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 240 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 473ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 474ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 552 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3972407906366166942.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14009417671340523813.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3972407906366166942.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14009417671340523813.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.014344,4096,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AF(AG((RequestBuffer_2>=1))) * AX((AX(((Server_Anwering_1_2>=1)&&(Client_Sending_1>=1))) + ((Server_Waiting_2>=1)&&(RequestBuffer_3>...286
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((RequestBuffer_3<1)||(Client_Sending_2<1))||((Server_Anwering_2_2<1)||((Server_Waiting_2...368
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,0,0.139059,9904,1,0,160,37627,84,82,809,42487,171
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 61 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 215 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 221 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 443ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 444ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 506 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2747129041125377052.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13995726544345852843.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2747129041125377052.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13995726544345852843.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.018739,4100,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((EX(((RequestBuffer_1<1)||(Server_Waiting_2<1))) * EG(((Client_Sending_2>=1)&&(Server_Anwering_2_1>=1)))) * ((Client_Waiting_3<1)&...207
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((EX(((RequestBuffer_1<1)||(Server_Waiting_2<1))) * EG(((Client_Sending_2>=1)&&...271
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,0,0.106506,8060,1,0,144,26474,85,62,817,28571,143
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 68 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 200 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 204 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 422ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 423ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 493 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3192192745753012541.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1584111630167791818.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3192192745753012541.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1584111630167791818.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.019927,4096,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((A(((Client_Sending_4>=1)&&(RequestBufferSlots>=1)) U EF(AG(((Client_Sending_1>=1)&&(RequestBufferSlots>=1))))) + A(((Server_Anwering...604
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX((!((E(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((Client_Sending_1>=1)&&(RequestBufferSlots>=1))))))) U (!(((Client...1289
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.325961,17860,1,0,396,81076,113,249,846,101252,485
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 17 transition count 25
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 13 transition count 21
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 13 transition count 21
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 12 transition count 20
Applied a total of 19 rules in 14 ms. Remains 12 /23 variables (removed 11) and now considering 20/28 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 12 cols
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 46 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 16 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/12 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/32 variables, 12/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/32 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 32/32 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved in 103 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 12/12 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/12 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/32 variables, 12/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 16/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/32 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 32/32 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved in 106 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 12/12 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 213ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 214ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 12/23 places, 20/28 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 282 ms. Remains : 12/23 places, 20/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7180222126331253943.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13351309562015041118.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7180222126331253943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13351309562015041118.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,250,0.00406,3420,2,46,5,452,6,0,67,490,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG((EF((RequestBuffer_4<1)) + !(E(((Client_Sending_2>=1)&&(RequestBufferSlots>=1)) U ((Client_Sending_2>=1)&&(Server_Anwering_2_1>=1)...208
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((RequestBuffer_1<1)||(Server_Waiting_1<1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (RequestBuffer_4<1)) ...278
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t8, t11, t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reve...186
(forward)formula 0,1,0.014442,4264,1,0,87,2946,67,44,432,3700,93
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 57 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 190 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 181 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 377ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 379ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 436 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6598489200680088753.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12618373465005369164.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6598489200680088753.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12618373465005369164.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.020059,3836,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AX((RequestBuffer_3>=1)) + EX(AF((Client_Waiting_4<1)))) + A(((Client_Sending_4>=1)&&(Server_Anwering_4_2>=1)) U EG((((Server_Anweri...246
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(EG((((Server_Anwering_1_2>=1)&&(Client_Sending_1>=1)) + E(TRUE U ((RequestBuff...573
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.198759,12020,1,0,220,47755,99,129,824,54672,273
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 186 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 206 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 397ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 397ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 449 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12768452753908471137.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability52780031355172347.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12768452753908471137.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability52780031355172347.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.021232,4104,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(((EX((Client_Waiting_4>=1)) * AF(((Server_Waiting_2>=1)&&(RequestBuffer_4>=1)))) * (A(((Client_Sending_2>=1)&&(Server_Anwering_2_1...656
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((EX((Client_Waiting_4>=1)) * !(EG(!(((Server_Waiting_2>=1)&&(RequestBuffer_4>=...1547
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.537719,25256,1,0,673,120502,122,383,845,154784,795
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 55 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 06:39:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 177 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/51 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 24/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 186 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 369ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 370ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 434 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 28/28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-21 06:39:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8759059723317139257.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5455009206759666765.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8759059723317139257.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5455009206759666765.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7424,0.018217,4100,2,427,5,2544,6,0,119,3392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((Server_Waiting_2>=1)&&(RequestBuffer_4>=1)) U AG((((E(EG(((Client_Sending_2>=1)&&(RequestBufferSlots>=1))) U !(((Client_Sending_2>=1)...696
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((Server_Waiting_2>=1)&&(RequestBuffer_4>=1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((((E(EG(((Client_Sending_2>=1)&&(Reque...879
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with...235
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 17/10/11
(forward)formula 0,1,0.281542,16776,1,0,332,77518,109,166,827,91756,364
FORMULA CSRepetitions-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-21 06:39:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 06:39:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 13079 ms.

BK_STOP 1716273560524

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CSRepetitions-PT-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is CSRepetitions-PT-02, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r070-tall-171620505400226"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CSRepetitions-PT-02.tgz
mv CSRepetitions-PT-02 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;