Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r070-tall-171620504900002.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is CANConstruction-PT-005, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r070-tall-171620504900002
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 696K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 121K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K Apr 22 14:31 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 22 14:31 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K Apr 22 14:31 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 22 14:31 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 12 18:15 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 148K Apr 12 18:15 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 18:14 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K Apr 12 18:14 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 22 14:31 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 22 14:31 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 167K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716213287193

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=CANConstruction-PT-005
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 75 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Transformed 112 places.
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Transformed 140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 112 places and 140 transitions and 400 arcs in 183 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 72 out of 112 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 140/140 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 112 /112 variables (removed 0) and now considering 140/140 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 112 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 208 ms returned [40, 54]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 242 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/112 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 109 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 109 transition count 139
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 109 /110 variables (removed 1) and now considering 139/140 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 109 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 109/112 places, 139/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 482 ms. Remains : 109/112 places, 139/140 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 109 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (518 resets) in 1623 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 5/66 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (127 resets) in 190 ms. (209 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (140 resets) in 160 ms. (248 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (134 resets) in 150 ms. (264 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (130 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (130 resets) in 64 ms. (615 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp35 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 94/105 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/108 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 139/247 variables, 108/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 45/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/248 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/248 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 248/248 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved in 197 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 99/105 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/108 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 139/247 variables, 108/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 45/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/248 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/248 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 248/248 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved in 178 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 401ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 105 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 28 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 28 transitions
Performed 28 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 28
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 109 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 81 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 79 transition count 109
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 79 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 77 transition count 107
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 61 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 61 transition count 76
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 61 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 59 transition count 74
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 56 transition count 71
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -10
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 51 transition count 81
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 51 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 50 transition count 80
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 50 transition count 80
Applied a total of 120 rules in 45 ms. Remains 50 /109 variables (removed 59) and now considering 80/139 (removed 59) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 50/109 places, 80/139 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1376 resets) in 286 ms. (139 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (281 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (282 resets) in 56 ms. (701 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 4423 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 24818 steps, saw 4423 distinct states, run finished after 63 ms. (steps per millisecond=393 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 4423 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 24818 steps, saw 4423 distinct states, run finished after 44 ms. (steps per millisecond=564 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
Support contains 67 out of 109 places (down from 68) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 24 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 30 rules in 6 ms. Remains 94 /109 variables (removed 15) and now considering 110/139 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 110/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 197 ms. Remains : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16158441488674906963.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5945552077761481766.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16158441488674906963.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5945552077761481766.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.068142,6072,2,1614,5,11346,6,0,444,9200,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AF((Node4GiveAnswer3>=1))) * EF((((Node2DHTinfo2>=1)&&(InsertedCount>=1))&&(Node1ReadyToInsert>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),!((Node4GiveAnswer3>=1)))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U (((Node2DHTinfo2>=1)&&(InsertedCount>=1...196
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t66, t69, t73, t105, t106, In...251
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 104/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,0.472798,23136,1,0,196,79997,246,115,2685,82046,244
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 95 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 95 transition count 111
Applied a total of 28 rules in 5 ms. Remains 95 /109 variables (removed 14) and now considering 111/139 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 95 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [12, 26, 65]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/109 places, 111/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 89 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 89 transition count 108
Applied a total of 6 rules in 4 ms. Remains 89 /92 variables (removed 3) and now considering 108/111 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/109 places, 108/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 214 ms. Remains : 89/109 places, 108/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3927511065800081798.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8302925773486173617.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3927511065800081798.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8302925773486173617.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.064133,6412,2,1807,5,12526,6,0,449,10803,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(E(EX((Node3ResZone<1)) U (EF((Node4DHTinfo2>=1)) + AG((Node4DHTinfo>=1))))) + (Node4GiveAnswer3<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((Node4GiveAnswer3<1))),EX((Node3ResZone<1))),TRUE) * (Node4DHTinfo2>=1))] = FA...280
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t37, t42, t48, t49, t58, t62, t66, t67, t70, t74, t106, t107, In...251
(forward)formula 0,1,0.512914,25108,1,0,206,86631,247,128,2761,102230,266
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 98 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 98 transition count 118
Applied a total of 22 rules in 3 ms. Remains 98 /109 variables (removed 11) and now considering 118/139 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/109 places, 118/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 92 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 92 transition count 115
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 92 /95 variables (removed 3) and now considering 115/118 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 92 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/109 places, 115/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 176 ms. Remains : 92/109 places, 115/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17818249477814604499.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10035806423139551216.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17818249477814604499.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10035806423139551216.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94386,0.083639,6708,2,2107,5,14163,6,0,468,12620,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(E(!(EF(AG(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node3ReadyToInsert>=1))))) U ((AG((((Node3IsInserted>=1)&&(Node1requestsent3>=1))||(Node3GiveAnswer2>...467
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node3ReadyToInsert>=1))))))) U ((!(E(TRUE U !((((N...549
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t58, t61, t62, t65, t69, t70, t73, t81, ...305
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,3.82509,139420,1,0,809,795998,281,427,2999,810346,888
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 93 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 93 transition count 108
Applied a total of 32 rules in 2 ms. Remains 93 /109 variables (removed 16) and now considering 108/139 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 93 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [26, 64]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 108/139 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 89 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 89 transition count 106
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 89 /91 variables (removed 2) and now considering 106/108 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/109 places, 106/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 190 ms. Remains : 89/109 places, 106/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13756852483767858625.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16013966300649014839.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13756852483767858625.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16013966300649014839.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92262,0.055244,5888,2,1540,5,10529,6,0,447,8721,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((EF(((Node0WaitAnswer>=1)&&(Node0OKshare>=1))) + AX(AG(((Node1IsInserted>=1)&&(Node2Request>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((E(TRUE U ((Node0WaitAnswer>=1)&&(Node0OKshare>=1))) + !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((Node1IsInserted>=1...194
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t15, t16, t26, t27, t37, t38, t48, t49, t58, t62, t66, t70, Intersection with reacha...229
(forward)formula 0,0,0.763876,34644,1,0,267,137586,241,195,2645,163695,330
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 93 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 93 transition count 108
Applied a total of 32 rules in 2 ms. Remains 93 /109 variables (removed 16) and now considering 108/139 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 93 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [12, 26]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 108/139 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 89 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 89 transition count 106
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 89 /91 variables (removed 2) and now considering 106/108 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/109 places, 106/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 178 ms. Remains : 89/109 places, 106/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8034725178999465882.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10093588930698840820.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8034725178999465882.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10093588930698840820.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92262,0.067908,6672,2,2016,5,12922,6,0,447,10643,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A((!(EG(EX((Node4IsNonInsertedNode>=1)))) + !(E(AX(((Node4WaitAnswer>=1)&&(Node4NOshare>=1))) U (Node2IsNonInsertedNode<1)))) U ((Node1...196
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,!(((Node1IsInserted>=1)&&(Node0requestsent1>=1)))) * !(((Node1IsInserted>=1)&&(Node0requests...379
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t48, t53, t58, t62, t66, t74, Intersection with reacha...229
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 97/0/9
(forward)formula 0,1,0.626392,28564,1,0,209,103743,251,129,2778,116734,265
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 97 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 97 transition count 116
Applied a total of 24 rules in 8 ms. Remains 97 /109 variables (removed 12) and now considering 116/139 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/109 places, 116/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 91 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 91 transition count 113
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 91 /94 variables (removed 3) and now considering 113/116 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 91 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/109 places, 113/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 230 ms. Remains : 91/109 places, 113/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3975185109292827208.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability469949128633231326.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3975185109292827208.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability469949128633231326.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94215,0.079926,6696,2,2000,5,13961,6,0,462,12038,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG(((Node1GiveAnswer3>=1) + E((Node4ID>=1) U AF((Node3GiveAnswer2>=1)))))) * A(EX(((Node0IsInserted>=1)&&(Node1Request>=1))) U ((!(AX...420
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((Node1GiveAnswer3>=1) + E((Node4ID>=1) U !(EG(!((Node3GiveAnswer2>=1))))))))))...1095
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t62, t65, t66, t69, t70, t73, t74, ...296
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.68181,107048,1,0,491,588712,278,274,2830,617008,571
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 30 rules in 1 ms. Remains 94 /109 variables (removed 15) and now considering 110/139 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 79 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 110/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 261 ms. Remains : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6008373695538641883.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15898116949281829451.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6008373695538641883.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15898116949281829451.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.067872,6412,2,1939,5,12927,6,0,444,10747,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(AX((Node3GiveAnswer2>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((Node3GiveAnswer2>=1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t62, t65, t69, t73, t95, t96, Inte...249
(forward)formula 0,1,0.756849,33508,1,0,220,144901,236,128,2548,138638,276
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 30 rules in 2 ms. Remains 94 /109 variables (removed 15) and now considering 110/139 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned [12, 64]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/109 places, 110/139 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 90 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 90 transition count 108
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 90 /92 variables (removed 2) and now considering 108/110 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 90 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/109 places, 108/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 189 ms. Remains : 90/109 places, 108/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability90961502364757117.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8132510541831283216.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability90961502364757117.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8132510541831283216.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.055227,5888,2,1566,5,10538,6,0,453,8899,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(!(E(AX(EG((Node4ID2>=1))) U AF(((Node2GiveAnswer3>=1)||((Node3IsInserted>=1)&&(Node1requestsent3>=1))))))) * EF(((EX(!(E((Node1ID>=1)...329
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((Init * EG(!(E(!(EX(!(EG((Node4ID2>=1))))) U !(EG(!(((Node2GiveAnswer3>=1)||((Node3IsInserted>=1)&&(Nod...693
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t15, t20, t26, t27, t37, t38, t48, t49, t62, t66, t67, t70, t74, t88, t89, Intersect...244
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.30053,83628,1,0,524,465686,267,338,2806,502146,667
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 30 rules in 2 ms. Remains 94 /109 variables (removed 15) and now considering 110/139 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 110/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 175 ms. Remains : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7621139657370240402.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16162836732402629494.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7621139657370240402.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16162836732402629494.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.063521,6412,2,1765,5,12908,6,0,444,10286,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AG(((Node2IsInserted<1)||(Node4Request<1))) * AF(EX(((Node0IsInserted<1)||(Node1requestsent0<1))))) * (AF((Node3GiveAnswer1<1)) * ((...221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((EY(Init) * (!(E(TRUE U !(((Node2IsInserted<1)||(Node4Request<1))))) * !(EG(!(EX(((Node0IsInserted<1)||(Node...478
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t58, t61, t65, t69, t73, t93, t94, Inte...249
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.716151,30224,1,0,251,128254,258,150,2729,126882,328
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 97 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 97 transition count 116
Applied a total of 24 rules in 2 ms. Remains 97 /109 variables (removed 12) and now considering 116/139 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/109 places, 116/139 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 92 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 92 transition count 114
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 92 /94 variables (removed 2) and now considering 114/116 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 92 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/109 places, 114/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 186 ms. Remains : 92/109 places, 114/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2648839581412833007.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8219482925473511593.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2648839581412833007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8219482925473511593.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94019,0.064611,6704,2,1809,5,12568,6,0,467,11469,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((Node4GiveAnswer2>=1) + AX(A(EF((Node1DHTinfo>=1)) U (Node2JoinMsg>=1)))) U A(((E((((Node0IsInserted>=1)&&(Node2requestsent0>=1))&&(No...340
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,((Node4GiveAnswer2>=1) + !(EX(!(!((E(!((Node2JoinMsg>=1)) U (!(E(TRUE U (Node1DHTinfo>=1))) * !((No...535
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t15, t20, t26, t27, t37, t38, t48, t49, t58, t59, t62, t63, t66, t70, t71, t74, t82, ...291
(forward)formula 0,0,3.60347,136444,1,0,753,793401,275,407,2749,831714,886
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 96 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 96 transition count 114
Applied a total of 26 rules in 1 ms. Remains 96 /109 variables (removed 13) and now considering 114/139 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 96 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/109 places, 114/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 90 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 90 transition count 111
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 90 /93 variables (removed 3) and now considering 111/114 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 90 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:09] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/109 places, 111/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 174 ms. Remains : 90/109 places, 111/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17317569336118541631.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1541261715476651087.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17317569336118541631.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1541261715476651087.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,93704,0.072701,6692,2,1955,5,12979,6,0,456,11192,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(AG(AX(AF((Node2GiveAnswer4>=1)))) U (Node3GiveAnswer2>=1)) U AG((Node1GiveAnswer0>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((Node2GiveAnswer4>=1)))))))))) U (Node3GiveAnswer2>=1))) * !(E(TRUE U !...191
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t62, t65, t69, t70, t73, t74, t83, ...280
(forward)formula 0,0,0.658467,26780,1,0,196,100340,244,112,2577,101284,235
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 95 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 95 transition count 112
Applied a total of 28 rules in 3 ms. Remains 95 /109 variables (removed 14) and now considering 112/139 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 95 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/109 places, 112/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 89 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 89 transition count 109
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 89 /92 variables (removed 3) and now considering 109/112 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/109 places, 109/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 89/109 places, 109/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6493665575200938842.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11588006140958168736.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6493665575200938842.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11588006140958168736.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,93219,0.074697,6680,2,1896,5,13150,6,0,450,11500,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(((Node0GiveAnswer3>=1) + !(AX(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node4ReadyToInsert>=1))))) U AX((Node4GiveAnswer1>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((Node0GiveAnswer3>=1) + !(!(EX(!(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node4ReadyToInsert>=1)))))))) * !(EX(!((Node...184
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t58, t61, t65, t66, t69, t73, t79, t80, ...266
(forward)formula 0,0,0.863952,37628,1,0,312,146367,242,195,2545,191728,355
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 97 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 97 transition count 116
Applied a total of 24 rules in 2 ms. Remains 97 /109 variables (removed 12) and now considering 116/139 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/109 places, 116/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 91 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 91 transition count 113
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 91 /94 variables (removed 3) and now considering 113/116 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 91 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:11] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/109 places, 113/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 184 ms. Remains : 91/109 places, 113/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2032820429270988057.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability351959690951106565.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2032820429270988057.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability351959690951106565.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94202,0.074134,6700,2,1905,5,13376,6,0,462,11830,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AF((Node4GiveAnswer2<1)) * EG(!(E((Node3ID2>=1) U ((Node0IsInserted>=1)&&(Node1Request>=1)))))) * ((A((Node1DHTinfo>=1) U ((EmptyCAN...522
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((EY(Init) * (!(EG(!((Node4GiveAnswer2<1)))) * EG(!(E((Node3ID2>=1) U ((Node0IsInserted>=1)&&(Node1Request>=...1487
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t58, t61, t62, t65, t66, t69, t70, t73, ...296
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,5.80424,178704,1,0,849,1.00822e+06,273,520,2852,1.18026e+06,946
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 93 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 93 transition count 108
Applied a total of 32 rules in 1 ms. Remains 93 /109 variables (removed 16) and now considering 108/139 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 93 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/109 places, 108/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 87 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 87 transition count 105
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 87 /90 variables (removed 3) and now considering 105/108 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 87 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 87/109 places, 105/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 178 ms. Remains : 87/109 places, 105/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15265313948900674507.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10609292512128977163.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15265313948900674507.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10609292512128977163.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92262,0.069477,6144,2,1711,5,12001,6,0,438,9686,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((Node2JoinMsg<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((Node2JoinMsg<1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t69, t73, Intersection with r...234
(forward)formula 0,0,0.420357,21736,1,0,173,78480,226,106,2418,81684,217
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 30 rules in 4 ms. Remains 94 /109 variables (removed 15) and now considering 110/139 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 110/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8775716333526927606.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6696051166700808316.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8775716333526927606.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6696051166700808316.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.067329,6140,2,1795,5,12203,6,0,444,9922,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(!(EG(A((Node3Bootstrap>=1) U ((Node2IsInserted>=1)&&(Node3Request>=1))))) U (!(((Node3ID<1)||(Node0GiveAnswer2>=1))) + AG((EF(((Node...221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!(EG(!((E(!(((Node2IsInserted>=1)&&(Node3Request>=1))) U (!((Node3Bootstrap>=1)) * !(((Node2IsInser...399
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t62, t65, t69, t73, t77, t78, Inte...249
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,2.52175,99384,1,0,527,564675,264,300,2737,548642,639
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 139/139 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 30 rules in 1 ms. Remains 94 /109 variables (removed 15) and now considering 110/139 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [12, 26, 64]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/109 places, 110/139 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 0 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 156 ms. Remains : 88/109 places, 107/139 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8040578912115967126.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14026711393404889194.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8040578912115967126.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14026711393404889194.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.067467,6404,2,1753,5,12265,6,0,444,10408,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(E(EX(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node4ReadyToInsert>=1))) U EG((Node4GiveAnswer0>=1)))) * AF(((EG((Node1JoinMsg>=1)) + AX(((Node0Request...233
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(EX(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node4ReadyToInsert>=1))) U EG((Node4GiveAnswer0>=1)))))))...303
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t69, t73, t74, t99, t100, Int...250
(forward)formula 0,1,0.651368,30064,1,0,241,127442,253,140,2508,137577,304
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-20 13:55:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 33728 ms.

BK_STOP 1716213322187

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CANConstruction-PT-005"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is CANConstruction-PT-005, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r070-tall-171620504900002"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CANConstruction-PT-005.tgz
mv CANConstruction-PT-005 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;