Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r070-tall-171620504900001.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is CANConstruction-PT-005, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r070-tall-171620504900001
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 696K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 121K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K Apr 22 14:31 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 22 14:31 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K Apr 22 14:31 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 22 14:31 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 12 18:15 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 148K Apr 12 18:15 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 18:14 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K Apr 12 18:14 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 22 14:31 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 22 14:31 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 167K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716213286170

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=CANConstruction-PT-005
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-20 13:54:47] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-20 13:54:47] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-20 13:54:47] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 76 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:47] [INFO ] Transformed 112 places.
[2024-05-20 13:54:47] [INFO ] Transformed 140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:47] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 112 places and 140 transitions and 400 arcs in 178 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 18 ms.
Support contains 99 out of 112 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 140/140 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 112 /112 variables (removed 0) and now considering 140/140 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 112 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:47] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 15 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 235 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 269 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/112 places, 140/140 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 111 /111 variables (removed 0) and now considering 140/140 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 309 ms. Remains : 111/112 places, 140/140 transitions.
Support contains 99 out of 111 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (509 resets) in 2405 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 17/123 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (12 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (13 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (10 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (12 resets) in 47 ms. (83 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (12 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 43 ms. (91 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (12 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (12 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (13 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (12 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (10 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (12 resets) in 41 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (12 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (10 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (11 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (13 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (14 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 111 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp56 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp58 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp72 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp75 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp78 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp101 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp102 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp113 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 81/106 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/110 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 140/250 variables, 110/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 45/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/251 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 251/251 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved in 248 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp57 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 99/105 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/110 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 140/250 variables, 110/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 45/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/251 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 251/251 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved in 208 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/17 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 513ms problems are : Problem set: 16 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 26 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=26 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 5 ms.
Successfully simplified 16 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
Support contains 86 out of 111 places (down from 88) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 21 stabilizing places and 25 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 95 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 95 transition count 109
Applied a total of 32 rules in 11 ms. Remains 95 /111 variables (removed 16) and now considering 109/140 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 95 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:49] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned [12, 26, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 163 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/111 places, 109/140 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 90 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 90 transition count 107
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 90 /92 variables (removed 2) and now considering 107/109 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 90 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/111 places, 107/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 408 ms. Remains : 90/111 places, 107/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality636717965611757979.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality367538061398805906.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality636717965611757979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality367538061398805906.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92262,0.089887,6620,2,2157,5,13864,6,0,452,11352,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX((EF((Node4WaitAnswer>0)) + (Node4requestsent3>Node3ResZone))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((E(TRUE U (Node4WaitAnswer>0)) + (Node4requestsent3>Node3ResZone))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t37, t42, t49, t54, t59, t63, t75, Intersection with reachable a...224
(forward)formula 0,0,0.675982,27644,1,0,187,96444,242,114,2667,106274,244
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 97 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 113
Applied a total of 28 rules in 6 ms. Remains 97 /111 variables (removed 14) and now considering 113/140 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [12, 26, 52, 66]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/111 places, 113/140 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 89 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 89 transition count 109
Applied a total of 8 rules in 5 ms. Remains 89 /93 variables (removed 4) and now considering 109/113 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/111 places, 109/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 202 ms. Remains : 89/111 places, 109/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9938646969240260818.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1583087782836660228.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9938646969240260818.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1583087782836660228.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,93219,0.057599,6156,2,1668,5,11765,6,0,450,9685,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A(!(EG(EF((Node2GiveAnswer4<=Node3GiveAnswer0)))) U AG(AF((Node3IsInserted<=Node2requestsent4)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((Node3IsInserted<=Node2requestsent4))))))))) * !(!(EG(E(TRUE U ...346
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t69, t70, t73, t74, t89, t90, ...264
(forward)formula 0,0,1.37513,54604,1,0,452,286509,248,250,2764,272046,533
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 111
Applied a total of 30 rules in 15 ms. Remains 96 /111 variables (removed 15) and now considering 111/140 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 96 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned [12, 26, 52, 66]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/111 places, 111/140 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 8 rules in 14 ms. Remains 88 /92 variables (removed 4) and now considering 107/111 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/111 places, 107/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 226 ms. Remains : 88/111 places, 107/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15219854488717099540.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12081531349442711938.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15219854488717099540.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12081531349442711938.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.057982,6140,2,1699,5,11744,6,0,444,9980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((AF((Node3JoinMsg<=Node1IsInserted)) + ((A((Node4requestsent2>=1) U (Node3requestsent0>=1)) * (Node1DHTinfo<=0)) * (Node2ReadyToInse...391
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(((!(EG(!((Node3JoinMsg<=Node1IsInserted)))) + ((!((E(!((Node3requestsent0>=1)) U (!((Node4requests...571
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t69, t70, t73, t89, t90, Inte...249
(forward)formula 0,0,2.14588,81860,1,0,423,444194,240,239,2656,468730,503
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 95 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 95 transition count 109
Applied a total of 32 rules in 4 ms. Remains 95 /111 variables (removed 16) and now considering 109/140 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 95 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [12, 52, 66]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/111 places, 109/140 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 89 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 89 transition count 106
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 89 /92 variables (removed 3) and now considering 106/109 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/111 places, 106/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 207 ms. Remains : 89/111 places, 106/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10959807538356620358.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7635271374701413583.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10959807538356620358.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7635271374701413583.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92262,0.05138,5880,2,1453,5,9622,6,0,447,8191,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A((EX((Node2ID2>=1)) + EF((EmptyCAN<=Node2DHTinfo))) U !(((Node1IsInserted<=1)&&(Node1WaitAnswer<=Node1ID2))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(((Node1IsInserted<=1)&&(Node1WaitAnswer<=Node1ID2))))) * !(!(((Node1IsInserted<=1)...357
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t15, t20, t26, t27, t37, t38, t48, t49, t62, t66, t70, t74, Intersection with reacha...229
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 92/9/14
(forward)formula 0,1,0.437118,23468,1,0,182,78403,244,110,2800,91343,238
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 97 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 113
Applied a total of 28 rules in 3 ms. Remains 97 /111 variables (removed 14) and now considering 113/140 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [12, 26, 52, 66]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/111 places, 113/140 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 90 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 90 transition count 110
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 90 /93 variables (removed 3) and now considering 110/113 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 90 cols
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/111 places, 110/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 90/111 places, 110/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14136283139243822419.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:54:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1940976692878551735.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14136283139243822419.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1940976692878551735.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,93231,0.073171,6688,2,1802,5,13051,6,0,455,10641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A((EX((AF((Node0GiveAnswer3>=1)) + A((Node0GiveAnswer2>=1) U (Node0requestsent3<=Node1Request)))) + AF(AG((Node3IsInserted<=Node3NOshare...410
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY((Init * !((E(!(!(EX(!(((!((E(!((Node1requestsent2>=1)) U (!((Node0GiveAnswer2>=1)) * !((Node1requestsen...1084
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t37, t42, t48, t49, t58, t62, t63, t66, t67, t70, t74, t78, t79, ...264
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,5.03169,149528,1,0,998,867846,293,592,2794,877851,1297
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 97 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 112
Applied a total of 28 rules in 3 ms. Remains 97 /111 variables (removed 14) and now considering 112/140 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [12, 26, 53, 67]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 79 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/111 places, 112/140 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 89 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 89 transition count 108
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 89 /93 variables (removed 4) and now considering 108/112 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/111 places, 108/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 263 ms. Remains : 89/111 places, 108/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12878566387460998398.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14309065753179394568.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12878566387460998398.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14309065753179394568.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.061052,6412,2,1835,5,12293,6,0,449,10007,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((Node3ID2<1) * AF(((AX(((Node0GiveAnswer4>=1)||(Node4IsNonInsertedNode<=0))) + AG((Node3DHTinfo2<=Node0ReadyToInsert))) + ((Node2Join...222
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((Node3ID2<1) * !(EG(!(((!(EX(!(((Node0GiveAnswer4>=1)||(Node4IsNonInsertedNode<=0))))) + !(E(TRUE U ...289
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t26, t31, t37, t38, t48, t49, t58, t66, t70, t71, t74, t82, t83, Intersect...244
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.316,47616,1,0,374,194069,254,237,2770,248985,388
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 110
Applied a total of 30 rules in 6 ms. Remains 96 /111 variables (removed 15) and now considering 110/140 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 96 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [12, 26, 53, 67]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/111 places, 110/140 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 89 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 89 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 89 /92 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 173 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 214 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/111 places, 107/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 272 ms. Remains : 89/111 places, 107/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5630085544755771534.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5034646117744097811.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5630085544755771534.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5034646117744097811.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92262,0.060852,6144,2,1688,5,11824,6,0,448,9336,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(!(A((!(EG((Node4DHTinfo2>=1))) * A((Node0ResZone>=1) U (Node3Request<=0))) U EX(((Node2OKshare>=1)&&(Node4JoinMsg>=1)))))) * EX(AX(AX...193
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(EX(((Node2OKshare>=1)&&(Node4JoinMsg>=1))))))) * !(E(!(EX(((Node2OKshare>=1)&&(Node...460
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t15, t16, t27, t32, t38, t39, t49, t50, t59, t67, t71, Intersection with reachable a...224
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,2.95592,104240,1,0,544,618824,255,365,2662,602223,595
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 111
Applied a total of 30 rules in 3 ms. Remains 96 /111 variables (removed 15) and now considering 111/140 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 96 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:05] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [12, 26, 52, 66]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/111 places, 111/140 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 88 /92 variables (removed 4) and now considering 107/111 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/111 places, 107/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 216 ms. Remains : 88/111 places, 107/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6676996861975258105.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14862504105241550049.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6676996861975258105.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14862504105241550049.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.060181,6144,2,1724,5,11757,6,0,444,9827,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(EX(AG(A((Node1ReadyToInsert<=0) U (Node3GiveAnswer4<=0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((Node3GiveAnswer4<=0)) U (!((Node1ReadyToInsert<=0)) * !((Node3G...219
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t69, t70, t73, t97, t98, Inte...249
(forward)formula 0,1,0.627512,26340,1,0,224,97323,247,130,2721,100348,292
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 111
Applied a total of 30 rules in 1 ms. Remains 96 /111 variables (removed 15) and now considering 111/140 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 96 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [12, 66]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/111 places, 111/140 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 93 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 93 transition count 110
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 93 /94 variables (removed 1) and now considering 110/111 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 93 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/111 places, 110/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 176 ms. Remains : 93/111 places, 110/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14114232051121912111.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3258023671071763085.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14114232051121912111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3258023671071763085.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.055761,5912,2,1576,5,10475,6,0,467,8602,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF((AX((Node0Bootstrap>Node4JoinMsg)) * EF((Node3GiveAnswer2>=1)))) * (Node0OKshare>=1)) * EG((((Node0ReadyToInsert<1) * AG((Node3Wa...212
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U (!(EX(!((Node0Bootstrap>Node4JoinMsg)))) * E(TRUE U (Node3GiveAnswer2>=1)))) * (Node0OKs...287
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t16, t21, t27, t28, t39, t44, t50, t51, t64, t65, t72, t98, t99, Intersection with r...234
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,3.38959,128580,1,0,707,749058,262,432,2998,770440,801
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 101 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 101 transition count 120
Applied a total of 20 rules in 2 ms. Remains 101 /111 variables (removed 10) and now considering 120/140 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 101 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [26, 53, 67]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/111 places, 120/140 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 120/120 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 98/111 places, 120/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4569293298044925353.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1464047654656575770.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4569293298044925353.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1464047654656575770.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94427,0.078192,6748,2,1776,5,14010,6,0,497,11274,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(A(AG((A((Node4requestsent3<=Node4IsNonInsertedNode) U (Node2requestsent0<=Node1Request)) * EG((Node1OKshare<=Node2ResZone)))) U (Node...806
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((E(!((Node3requestsent1>=1)) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!((Node2requestsent0<=Node1Request)) U (!((No...1354
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t16, t21, t28, t33, t40, t45, t52, t57, t62, t63, t66, t67, t70, t71, t82, t83, t86, ...293
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,3.64646,139112,1,0,912,830137,326,518,3095,778132,1110
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 97 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 113
Applied a total of 28 rules in 2 ms. Remains 97 /111 variables (removed 14) and now considering 113/140 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [12, 26, 52, 66]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 43 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/111 places, 113/140 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 89 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 89 transition count 109
Applied a total of 8 rules in 1 ms. Remains 89 /93 variables (removed 4) and now considering 109/113 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/111 places, 109/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 174 ms. Remains : 89/111 places, 109/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15833591039642327912.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4652222778182481572.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15833591039642327912.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4652222778182481572.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,93206,0.078023,6680,2,1884,5,13366,6,0,450,11133,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EX(EX(!(E((Node2NOshare<=Node1requestsent3) U (Node0GiveAnswer3>=1)))))) + AX(E((Node3GiveAnswer0<=0) U (Node0DHTinfo>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(EX(!(E((Node2NOshare<=Node1requestsent3) U (Node0GiveAnswer3>=1))))))))))) * !(E(...208
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t66, t69, t73, t74, t79, t80, ...264
(forward)formula 0,0,1.48185,56176,1,0,359,276206,248,199,2650,283228,422
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 111
Applied a total of 30 rules in 5 ms. Remains 96 /111 variables (removed 15) and now considering 111/140 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 96 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:15] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [26, 52, 66]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/111 places, 111/140 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 90 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 90 transition count 108
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 90 /93 variables (removed 3) and now considering 108/111 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 90 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:15] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/111 places, 108/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 189 ms. Remains : 90/111 places, 108/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2959914432765426758.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality518072154518002420.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2959914432765426758.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality518072154518002420.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.053886,5892,2,1557,5,10307,6,0,453,8989,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(A(((Node3requestsent1<1) + EX((Node4GiveAnswer1<=0))) U (Node0ResZone>=1))) * EG((E((Node1requestsent0<=0) U EF(((Node2DHTinfo<=0)&&(...216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((FwdU(EY(Init),!((Node0ResZone>=1))) * !((Node0ResZone>=1))) * !((Node3requestsent1<1))) * !(EX((Node4GiveA...373
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t15, t16, t26, t27, t37, t38, t48, t49, t58, t59, t62, t66, t70, t102, t103, Interse...246
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 106/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.897734,40184,1,0,280,194096,258,161,2805,183099,368
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 111
Applied a total of 30 rules in 1 ms. Remains 96 /111 variables (removed 15) and now considering 111/140 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 96 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned [12, 26, 52, 66]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/111 places, 111/140 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 8 rules in 1 ms. Remains 88 /92 variables (removed 4) and now considering 107/111 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/111 places, 107/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 174 ms. Remains : 88/111 places, 107/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7085023906145277113.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17531305038195800703.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7085023906145277113.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17531305038195800703.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.063704,6408,2,1782,5,12207,6,0,444,10332,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(FALSE) * AX((Node2GiveAnswer0>0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !((Node2GiveAnswer0>0)))] = FALSE)
(forward)formula 0,0,0.067049,6672,1,0,9,12207,9,2,582,10332,2
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 98 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 114
Applied a total of 26 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /111 variables (removed 13) and now considering 114/140 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [26, 67]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/111 places, 114/140 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 94 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 94 transition count 112
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 94 /96 variables (removed 2) and now considering 112/114 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 94/111 places, 112/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 173 ms. Remains : 94/111 places, 112/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 112 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10692836961446392041.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16064874489066566267.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10692836961446392041.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16064874489066566267.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,93206,0.081813,6712,2,2043,5,13787,6,0,473,11626,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((E(!(((Node4requestsent3<=Node3WaitAnswer)&&(Node4IsNonInsertedNode<=0))) U EF((!((EF((Node2ResZone<=0)) * AX((Node1ReadyToInsert>=1))))...506
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU((Init * (E(!(((Node4requestsent3<=Node3WaitAnswer)&&(Node4IsNonInsertedNode<=0))) U E(TRUE U (!((E(TRU...737
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t15, t16, t27, t32, t39, t44, t50, t51, t60, t61, t72, t73, t84, t85, t106, t107, In...251
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,4.6147,167464,1,0,745,978609,299,487,2925,1.0025e+06,956
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 98 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 115
Applied a total of 26 rules in 4 ms. Remains 98 /111 variables (removed 13) and now considering 115/140 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-20 13:55:22] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [12]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/111 places, 115/140 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 97 /97 variables (removed 0) and now considering 115/115 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 97/111 places, 115/140 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:55:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3760960974926568512.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15231297203922577154.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3760960974926568512.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15231297203922577154.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,93559,0.069108,6468,2,2020,5,12311,6,0,488,10417,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!((((((Node1ResZone>EmptyCAN) * EG((Node1GiveAnswer2>=1))) + (((Node3WaitAnswer>0)&&(Node3JoinMsg<=0))&&(Node2requestsent3<=0))) * EX(...377
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,(!((((((Node1ResZone>EmptyCAN) * EG((Node1GiveAnswer2>=1))) + (((Node3WaitAnswer>0)&&(Node3Joi...445
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t16, t21, t27, t28, t39, t44, t51, t56, t61, t62, t65, t66, t81, t82, t107, t108, t11...263
(forward)formula 0,1,3.20786,101052,1,0,408,560349,266,248,3055,540090,538
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-20 13:55:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:55:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 38196 ms.

BK_STOP 1716213325579

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CANConstruction-PT-005"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is CANConstruction-PT-005, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r070-tall-171620504900001"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CANConstruction-PT-005.tgz
mv CANConstruction-PT-005 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;