About the Execution of ITS-Tools for BusinessProcesses-PT-17
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
376.979 | 74125.00 | 95358.00 | 50.20 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r048-tajo-171620399800581.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2' backing_fmt='qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-17, examination is UpperBounds
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r048-tajo-171620399800581
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 652K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:31 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 22 14:31 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:31 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 22 14:31 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 11 16:34 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 151K Apr 11 16:34 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K Apr 11 16:34 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K Apr 11 16:34 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:31 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:31 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 161K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of positive values
NUM_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-11
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716336962907
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=UpperBounds
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-17
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
UpperBounds PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-22 00:16:04] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, UpperBounds, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-22 00:16:04] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-22 00:16:04] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 87 ms
[2024-05-22 00:16:04] [INFO ] Transformed 650 places.
[2024-05-22 00:16:04] [INFO ] Transformed 580 transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:16:04] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-22 00:16:04] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 650 places and 580 transitions and 1709 arcs in 194 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/UpperBounds.xml in 7 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 10 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 4 transitions.
Current structural bounds on expressions (Initiallly, because the net is safe) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Before main loop) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
// Phase 1: matrix 576 rows 646 cols
[2024-05-22 00:16:04] [INFO ] Computed 108 invariants in 29 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
RANDOM walk for 10000 steps (66 resets) in 49 ms. (200 steps per ms)
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-14 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-13 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-11 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-10 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-01 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-00 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
BEST_FIRST walk for 100009 steps (115 resets) in 127 ms. (781 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
[2024-05-22 00:16:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:16:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 183 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 241 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:05] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:16:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 23 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 182 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 167 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 169 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 176 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 189 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 217 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 182 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 189 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 180 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 166 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 168 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 144 places in 175 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 187 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 167 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 140 places in 209 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 144 places in 175 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 193 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 145 places in 154 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 140 places in 178 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 168 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 153 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 151 places in 172 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 142 places in 136 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 143 places in 133 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 142 places in 172 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:10] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close... while checking expression at index 0
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:299)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTTrapUtils.refineWithTraps(SMTTrapUtils.java:177)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:868)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.findStructuralMaxWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:2251)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.UpperBoundsSolver.applyReductions(UpperBoundsSolver.java:219)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:910)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:189)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:45)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:136)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:402)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:651)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:588)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1459)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1432)
[2024-05-22 00:16:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 25 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 265 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 164 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:16:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 29 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 300 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 226 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 201 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 202 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 168 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 196 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 198 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 168 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 164 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 163 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 168 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 158 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 191 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 152 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 169 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 176 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 161 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 122 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 120 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:15] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 19/18 trap constraints in 3617 ms
[2024-05-22 00:16:15] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 540/880/540 causal constraints (skipped 35 transitions) in 62 ms.
Maximisation of solution failed !
Minimization took 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:16:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 27 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 208 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 231 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:17] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:16:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 23 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 181 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 207 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 206 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 183 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 137 places in 181 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 169 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 196 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 223 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 194 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 178 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 210 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 177 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 174 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 198 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 211 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 190 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 189 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 186 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 179 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 203 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 169 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 170 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 120 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:22] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close... while checking expression at index 2
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:299)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTTrapUtils.refineWithTraps(SMTTrapUtils.java:177)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:868)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.findStructuralMaxWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:2251)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.UpperBoundsSolver.applyReductions(UpperBoundsSolver.java:219)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:910)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:189)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:45)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:136)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:402)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:651)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:588)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1459)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1432)
[2024-05-22 00:16:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 25 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 213 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 203 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:22] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:16:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 27 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 234 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 198 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 180 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 168 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 171 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 174 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 140 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 183 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 158 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 157 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 137 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 133 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 158 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 133 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 148 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 133 places in 151 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 159 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 148 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 164 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 152 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 145 places in 146 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 175 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 147 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 155 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 106 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 109 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:27] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close... while checking expression at index 3
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:299)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTTrapUtils.refineWithTraps(SMTTrapUtils.java:177)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:868)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.findStructuralMaxWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:2251)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.UpperBoundsSolver.applyReductions(UpperBoundsSolver.java:219)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:910)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:189)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:45)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:136)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:402)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:651)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:588)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1459)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1432)
[2024-05-22 00:16:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 18 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 156 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:28] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:16:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 132 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 203 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 206 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 170 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 188 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 206 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 203 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 163 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 166 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 171 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 143 places in 176 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 147 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 172 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 144 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 136 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 156 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 158 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 139 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 149 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 161 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 125 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 137 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 154 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 119 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 119 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 117 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:33] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed... while checking expression at index 4
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:299)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.refineWithCausalOrder(DeadlockTester.java:954)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:875)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.findStructuralMaxWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:2251)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.UpperBoundsSolver.applyReductions(UpperBoundsSolver.java:219)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:910)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:189)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:45)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:136)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:402)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:651)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:588)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1459)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1432)
[2024-05-22 00:16:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 18 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 162 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 158 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:33] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:16:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 139 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 134 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 130 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 139 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 141 places in 126 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 174 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 145 places in 128 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 128 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 145 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 139 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 132 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 121 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 153 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 138 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 131 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 146 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 122 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 159 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 149 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 122 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 157 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 156 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 133 places in 133 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 95 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 117 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 114 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 122 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 119 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:38] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close... while checking expression at index 5
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:299)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTTrapUtils.refineWithTraps(SMTTrapUtils.java:177)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:868)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.findStructuralMaxWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:2251)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.UpperBoundsSolver.applyReductions(UpperBoundsSolver.java:219)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:910)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:189)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:45)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:136)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:402)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:651)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:588)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1459)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1432)
[2024-05-22 00:16:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 18 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 195 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 206 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:39] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:16:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 218 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 183 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 178 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 173 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 201 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 180 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 179 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 194 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 180 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 138 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 139 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 140 places in 139 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 135 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 161 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 157 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 140 places in 148 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 137 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 138 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 186 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 133 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 146 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 147 places in 132 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 154 places in 128 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 151 places in 151 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 150 places in 125 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 152 places in 148 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 150 places in 128 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 155 places in 175 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:44] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close... while checking expression at index 6
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:299)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTTrapUtils.refineWithTraps(SMTTrapUtils.java:177)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:868)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.findStructuralMaxWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:2251)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.UpperBoundsSolver.applyReductions(UpperBoundsSolver.java:219)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:910)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:189)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:45)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:136)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:402)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:651)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:588)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1459)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1432)
[2024-05-22 00:16:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 175 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 172 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:45] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:16:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 163 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 194 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 182 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 150 places in 161 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 160 places in 153 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 149 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 137 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 133 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 136 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 139 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 164 places in 140 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 144 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 16/15 trap constraints in 2278 ms
[2024-05-22 00:16:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 540/880/540 causal constraints (skipped 35 transitions) in 34 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:16:50] [INFO ] Added : 345 causal constraints over 69 iterations in 2386 ms. Result :unknown
[2024-05-22 00:16:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 254 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:50] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:16:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 244 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 161 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 127 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 136 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:53] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 19/18 trap constraints in 2033 ms
[2024-05-22 00:16:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 540/880/540 causal constraints (skipped 35 transitions) in 41 ms.
Maximisation of solution failed !
Minimization took 1 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:16:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 211 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 209 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:56] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:16:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive place invariants in 27 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 62 positive and 46 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 206 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 187 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 178 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 141 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 179 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 179 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 147 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 141 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 140 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 123 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 156 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 163 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 121 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 143 places in 159 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 148 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 135 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 147 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 175 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 143 places in 174 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 133 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 138 places in 147 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 137 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 134 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 155 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 129 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 129 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 154 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 143 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:01] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close... while checking expression at index 9
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:299)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTTrapUtils.refineWithTraps(SMTTrapUtils.java:177)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:868)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.findStructuralMaxWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:2251)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.UpperBoundsSolver.applyReductions(UpperBoundsSolver.java:219)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:910)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:189)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:45)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:136)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:402)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:651)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:588)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1459)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1432)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
Support contains 10 out of 646 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 576/576 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 358 edges and 646 vertex of which 7 / 646 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1304 edges and 640 vertex of which 636 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 138 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 138 transitions
Performed 138 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 138
Iterating post reduction 0 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 636 transition count 429
Reduce places removed 138 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 498 transition count 427
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 496 transition count 427
Performed 94 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 94 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 496 transition count 333
Deduced a syphon composed of 94 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 206 rules applied. Total rules applied 488 place count 384 transition count 333
Discarding 79 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 79 rule applications. Total rules 567 place count 305 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 3 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 646 place count 305 transition count 254
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 646 place count 305 transition count 246
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 664 place count 295 transition count 246
Performed 101 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 101
Deduced a syphon composed of 101 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 104 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 205 rules applied. Total rules applied 869 place count 191 transition count 145
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 871 place count 190 transition count 149
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 873 place count 190 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 875 place count 188 transition count 147
Applied a total of 875 rules in 134 ms. Remains 188 /646 variables (removed 458) and now considering 147/576 (removed 429) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 143 ms. Remains : 188/646 places, 147/576 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 147 rows 188 cols
[2024-05-22 00:17:01] [INFO ] Computed 82 invariants in 4 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (24813 resets) in 3273 ms. (305 steps per ms)
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-15 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-12 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-09 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-08 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-06 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-05 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-04 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-03 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-02 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000001 steps (9308 resets) in 2100 ms. (475 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 59 positive place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 59 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 60 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] [Real]Added 13 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 59 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 59 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 53 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 13 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 96/443/96 causal constraints (skipped 49 transitions) in 14 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:17:07] [INFO ] Added : 30 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 125 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 264 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 188 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Drop transitions (Removing consumers from one bounded place p344) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 146/146 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 188 transition count 143
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 185 transition count 143
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 185 transition count 138
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 178 transition count 138
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 177 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 177 transition count 137
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 174 transition count 134
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 174 transition count 134
Applied a total of 27 rules in 43 ms. Remains 174 /188 variables (removed 14) and now considering 134/146 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 174/188 places, 134/146 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 134 rows 174 cols
[2024-05-22 00:17:08] [INFO ] Computed 80 invariants in 3 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (28733 resets) in 2996 ms. (333 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000001 steps (15493 resets) in 2322 ms. (430 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 60 positive place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 60 positive and 20 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 59 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] [Real]Added 14 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 60 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 60 positive and 20 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 50 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 14 Read/Feed constraints in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 81/416/81 causal constraints (skipped 51 transitions) in 28 ms.
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 131 ms
[2024-05-22 00:17:13] [INFO ] Added : 28 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 258 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 70 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[1] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 174 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 174/174 places, 134/134 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 174 /174 variables (removed 0) and now considering 134/134 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 13 ms. Remains : 174/174 places, 134/134 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 174/174 places, 134/134 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 174 /174 variables (removed 0) and now considering 134/134 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 00:17:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 00:17:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 192 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 32, 33, 34, 35, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56]
[2024-05-22 00:17:14] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [1, 4, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, 32, 33, 34, 35, 42, 43, 44, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56]
Discarding 23 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 197 ms to find 23 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 151/174 places, 134/134 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 151 /151 variables (removed 0) and now considering 134/134 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 220 ms. Remains : 151/174 places, 134/134 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 134 rows 151 cols
[2024-05-22 00:17:14] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 3 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[1] Max Struct:[1]
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-17-UpperBounds-07 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (28690 resets) in 2369 ms. (421 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 0 steps (0 resets) in 0 ms. (0 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[] Max Struct:[]
RANDOM walk for 0 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (0 steps per ms) remains 0/0 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 0 steps, run visited all 0 properties in 0 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
[2024-05-22 00:17:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2024-05-22 00:17:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-22 00:17:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6675585587749667111.gal : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 00:17:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12290649249156385248.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6675585587749667111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12290649249156385248.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Current structural bounds on expressions (After reachability solving 0 queries.) : Max Seen:[] Max Struct:[]
All properties solved without resorting to model-checking.
Total runtime 72815 ms.
BK_STOP 1716337037032
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ UpperBounds = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution UpperBounds -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination UpperBounds -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-17"
export BK_EXAMINATION="UpperBounds"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-17, examination is UpperBounds"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r048-tajo-171620399800581"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-17.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-17 execution
cd execution
if [ "UpperBounds" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "Liveness" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "UpperBounds" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "UpperBounds" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "UpperBounds.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property UpperBounds.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "UpperBounds.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "UpperBounds" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "Liveness" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME UpperBounds"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;