Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r048-tajo-171620399500450.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2' backing_fmt='qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-01, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r048-tajo-171620399500450
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 496K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 101K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:30 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 22 14:30 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 22 14:30 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 22 14:30 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K Apr 11 16:34 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K Apr 11 16:34 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Apr 11 16:34 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K Apr 11 16:34 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:30 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:30 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716333543734

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-01
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-21 23:19:06] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-21 23:19:06] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-21 23:19:06] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 102 ms
[2024-05-21 23:19:06] [INFO ] Transformed 200 places.
[2024-05-21 23:19:06] [INFO ] Transformed 178 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:19:06] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-21 23:19:06] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 200 places and 178 transitions and 487 arcs in 284 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 20 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 91 out of 199 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 199/199 places, 177/177 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 197 transition count 177
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 186 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 186 transition count 166
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 183 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 183 transition count 163
Applied a total of 30 rules in 66 ms. Remains 183 /199 variables (removed 16) and now considering 163/177 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 183 cols
[2024-05-21 23:19:06] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 18 ms
[2024-05-21 23:19:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1005 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:19:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:19:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 326 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1385 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:19:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/183 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 130 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 78 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 108 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 78 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 78 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 73 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 93 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 151 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 112 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 80 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 140 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 2856 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 160 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 2806 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 2761 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 96 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 131 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 160 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 110 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 118 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 74 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 65 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 87 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 2706 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 79 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 84 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 160 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 159 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 1515 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 106 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 76 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 78 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
[2024-05-21 23:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 20/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 158 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30126ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 30154ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 183/199 places, 159/177 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 182 transition count 159
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 182 /183 variables (removed 1) and now considering 159/159 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 182 cols
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 182/199 places, 159/177 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31849 ms. Remains : 182/199 places, 159/177 transitions.
Support contains 91 out of 182 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 23:19:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 182 places (down from 91) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (467 resets) in 3163 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 11/76 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (90 resets) in 166 ms. (239 steps per ms) remains 10/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (101 resets) in 133 ms. (298 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (99 resets) in 174 ms. (228 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (97 resets) in 135 ms. (294 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 225 ms. (177 steps per ms) remains 9/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (116 resets) in 170 ms. (233 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (101 resets) in 113 ms. (350 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (88 resets) in 123 ms. (322 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (105 resets) in 84 ms. (470 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2024-05-21 23:19:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 83/103 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 47/150 variables, 11/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 26/176 variables, 9/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 155/331 variables, 176/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 5 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 7/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 9/340 variables, 5/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 5 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 6/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 5 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 2/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/341 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 226 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved in 1417 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 182/182 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp65 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 86/97 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/149 variables, 12/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 27/176 variables, 10/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 13/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 155/331 variables, 176/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 9/340 variables, 5/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1/341 variables, 1/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved in 216 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 182/182 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/8 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 1646ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 75 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=75 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 5 ms.
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 23:19:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
Computed a total of 151 stabilizing places and 128 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 351 edges and 182 vertex of which 181 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 181 transition count 159
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 160 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 160 transition count 138
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 160 transition count 137
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 147 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 147 transition count 124
Applied a total of 70 rules in 17 ms. Remains 147 /182 variables (removed 35) and now considering 124/159 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 147 cols
[2024-05-21 23:19:42] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:19:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:19:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:19:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:19:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 11/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 5/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 4/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 5/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 6/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 124/271 variables, 147/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 341 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 5/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 3/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 0/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 271/271 variables, and 217 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 14161 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 42/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 2/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 124/271 variables, 147/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 123/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 2/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 0/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 271/271 variables, and 344 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 9265 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints]
After SMT, in 23447ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23448ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 147/182 places, 124/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23629 ms. Remains : 147/182 places, 124/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:20:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:20:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16810606089211796814.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:20:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17488157845857426389.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16810606089211796814.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17488157845857426389.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27085e+10,0.89651,29616,2,17241,5,97859,6,0,713,132055,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AG((p191==0)) + AF((((p51==0)||(p138==0))||((p193==0)||(p87==0))))) + (A((p24==1) U EG((p86==1))) + EF((((((p34==1)&&(p113==1))&&(p1...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!((E(!(EG((p86==1))) U (!((p24==1)) * !(EG((p86==1))))) + EG(!(EG((p86==1)))))) + E...340
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t5, t24, t27, t30, t33, t36, t39, t42, t45, t48, t53, t56, t59, t63, t64, t67, t68, t...305
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 23:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 23:20:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 23:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17095720324976777691.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17095720324976777691.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17095720324976777691.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17095720324976777691.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17095720324976777691.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 23:20:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 23:20:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 23:20:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:20:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2024-05-21 23:20:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2024-05-21 23:20:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16449075461474188946.gal : 15 ms
[2024-05-21 23:20:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16662007652176733797.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16449075461474188946.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16662007652176733797.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27085e+10,0.127383,7304,1164,25,7524,275,349,10781,46,559,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AG((i12.u48.p191==0)) + AF((((i0.u16.p51==0)||(i9.u38.p138==0))||((i12.u39.p193==0)||(i10.u27.p87==0))))) + (A((i2.u8.p24==1) U EG((...290
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!((E(!(EG((i10.u27.p86==1))) U (!((i2.u8.p24==1)) * !(EG((i10.u27.p86==1))))) + EG(...447
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t68, t72, t86, t114, t115, i0.t64, i0.u16.t67, i1.u6.t89, i2.t85, i2.t78, i3.u4.t92, i4.u12.t...466
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,1,14.8735,297704,1,0,595020,311,2268,802978,242,660,726974
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 181 transition count 159
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 159 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 159 transition count 137
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 159 transition count 136
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 145 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 145 transition count 122
Applied a total of 74 rules in 11 ms. Remains 145 /182 variables (removed 37) and now considering 122/159 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 145 cols
[2024-05-21 23:20:51] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:20:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:20:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:20:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 264 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:20:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 7/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 122/267 variables, 145/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 6/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 5/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 17052 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 42/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/267 variables, 145/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 121/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 4/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 11701 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints]
After SMT, in 28770ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28775ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 145/182 places, 122/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29064 ms. Remains : 145/182 places, 122/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:21:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 23:21:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:21:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:21:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:21:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:21:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13967199970800006035.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:21:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability983998020361253028.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13967199970800006035.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability983998020361253028.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.30044e+10,0.697715,27900,2,15368,5,91386,6,0,703,122784,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(((p8==1) + EX(!(((p33==1)&&((p106==1)||(p182==1)))))) U AG(!(EX(((p8==1)||(p89==1)))))) * EF(AX((p32==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(((p8==1) + EX(!(((p33==1)&&((p106==1)||(p182==1)))))) U !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(((p8==1)||(p89==1))))...198
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t22, t25, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t51, t54, t57, t61, t62, t65, t66, t69, ...305
(forward)formula 0,1,16.3472,356724,1,0,367,1.44724e+06,274,203,4289,1.75417e+06,371
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 181 transition count 159
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 158 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 158 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 158 transition count 135
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 143 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 143 transition count 120
Applied a total of 78 rules in 24 ms. Remains 143 /182 variables (removed 39) and now considering 120/159 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 143 cols
[2024-05-21 23:21:36] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:21:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:21:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 18/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 5/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 11/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 10631 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 43/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 119/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 263/263 variables, and 345 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 12443 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints]
After SMT, in 23095ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23097ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 143/182 places, 120/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23331 ms. Remains : 143/182 places, 120/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:22:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 23:22:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 23:22:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:22:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:22:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:22:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14170846268364216293.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:22:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15880741483812297275.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14170846268364216293.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15880741483812297275.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24738e+10,0.770414,27172,2,14993,5,88735,6,0,693,119299,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(EX(!(AG((p52==1)))) U AG(!(AG((p4==1))))) * EF((p121==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p52==1)))))) U !(E(TRUE U !(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p4==1)))))))))))] = FALS...212
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t22, t25, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t51, t54, t57, t61, t62, t65, t66, t69, ...301
(forward)formula 0,1,11.2673,238888,1,0,262,958713,268,124,4028,976598,266
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 181 transition count 159
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 161 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 161 transition count 139
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 161 transition count 138
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 147 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 147 transition count 124
Applied a total of 70 rules in 12 ms. Remains 147 /182 variables (removed 35) and now considering 124/159 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 147 cols
[2024-05-21 23:22:11] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 187 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 275 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 2215 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 4/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 124/271 variables, 147/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 3/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 3/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 271/271 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 17841 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 43/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 124/271 variables, 147/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 123/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 3/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 5/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 3/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 271/271 variables, and 353 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 15089 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints]
After SMT, in 32976ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 32980ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 147/182 places, 124/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33269 ms. Remains : 147/182 places, 124/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 23:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:22:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:22:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-21 23:22:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18223721152826575408.gal : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 23:22:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2773078202526722237.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18223721152826575408.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2773078202526722237.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.37919e+10,1.13238,36456,2,16489,5,113361,6,0,713,179590,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((((AX((E((p43==1) U (p132==1)) * (p153==1))) * AG(A((((p68==1)&&(p124==1))&&(p194==1)) U (((p57==1)&&(p133==1))&&(p193==1))))) + (p85...262
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY((Init * !(!(EX(!((((!(EX(!((E((p43==1) U (p132==1)) * (p153==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((((p57==1)...845
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t14, t24, t28, t29, t31, t34, t37, t41, t42, t44, t47, t50, t55, t58, t61, t65, t66, ...310
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 23:23:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 23:23:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9698273542117290711.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9698273542117290711.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9698273542117290711.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9698273542117290711.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9698273542117290711.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 23:23:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 23:23:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 23:23:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:23:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2024-05-21 23:23:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11533459175666749103.gal : 15 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14444071500415551051.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11533459175666749103.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14444071500415551051.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.37919e+10,0.072652,6576,872,24,6679,293,392,7885,47,611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((((AX((E((i4.u12.p43==1) U (i13.u39.p132==1)) * (i14.u43.p153==1))) * AG(A((((i15.i1.u18.p68==1)&&(u36.p124==1))&&(i15.i1.u50.p194==1...404
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY((Init * !(!(EX(!((((!(EX(!((E((i4.u12.p43==1) U (i13.u39.p132==1)) * (i14.u43.p153==1))))) * !(E(TRU...1214
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t74, t78, t86, t114, u36.t34, i0.t70, i0.t66, i0.u13.t73, i0.u15.t69, i1.u4.t92, i2.u6.t89, i...491
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,3.59065,137256,1,0,277394,293,2349,420915,220,693,395512
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 351 edges and 182 vertex of which 181 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 179 transition count 132
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 154 transition count 130
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 152 transition count 130
Performed 36 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 36 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 152 transition count 94
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 110 transition count 94
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 155 place count 88 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 88 transition count 72
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 88 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 87 transition count 70
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 87 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 85 transition count 68
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 52 transition count 37
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 52 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 51 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 50 transition count 35
Applied a total of 251 rules in 68 ms. Remains 50 /182 variables (removed 132) and now considering 35/159 (removed 124) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 50 cols
[2024-05-21 23:23:18] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [0, 1, 5, 6, 7]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/182 places, 35/159 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 35/35 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 128 ms. Remains : 45/182 places, 35/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 35 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2340370692852512992.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13777513634326589893.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2340370692852512992.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13777513634326589893.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2838,0.030101,3968,2,325,5,2421,6,0,216,2220,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((((p81==0)||(p139==0))||(p193==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p81==0)||(p139==0))||(p193==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t10, t15, t21, t27, t33, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...188
(forward)formula 0,1,0.06872,5288,1,0,73,9889,92,34,1352,5671,79
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 181 transition count 159
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 161 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 161 transition count 139
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 161 transition count 138
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 148 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 148 transition count 125
Applied a total of 68 rules in 10 ms. Remains 148 /182 variables (removed 34) and now considering 125/159 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 148 cols
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 205 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 367 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:23:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 125/273 variables, 148/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 3/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 5/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/273 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 273/273 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 10148 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 148/148 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 29/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 125/273 variables, 148/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 124/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 3/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 2/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 3/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/273 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 273/273 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 13812 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 148/148 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints]
After SMT, in 23996ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24000ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/182 places, 125/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24380 ms. Remains : 148/182 places, 125/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:23:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:23:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15647692267693100765.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:23:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3282788990071510405.ctl : 12 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15647692267693100765.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3282788990071510405.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.39253e+10,0.827842,33040,2,16867,5,105940,6,0,718,155503,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(A((EF((p41==1)) * !(E((p55==1) U (p14==1)))) U ((p116==1) + !(EG((p3==1)))))) U AF(AG(((p181!=1) + ((p36==1) * EX((p132==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p181!=1) + ((p36==1) * EX((p132==1)))))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE ...469
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t8, t23, t27, t28, t30, t33, t36, t39, t42, t45, t48, t53, t56, t59, t63, t64, t67, t68, ...321
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,17.7277,494932,1,0,742,2.13143e+06,299,421,4404,2.15001e+06,870
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 351 edges and 182 vertex of which 181 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 179 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 155 transition count 131
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 153 transition count 131
Performed 35 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 35 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 153 transition count 96
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 112 transition count 96
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 91 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 91 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 91 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 90 transition count 73
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 90 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 88 transition count 71
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 57 transition count 42
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 57 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 56 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 55 transition count 40
Applied a total of 241 rules in 56 ms. Remains 55 /182 variables (removed 127) and now considering 40/159 (removed 119) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [7, 8, 9]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 60 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/182 places, 40/159 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 52 /52 variables (removed 0) and now considering 40/40 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 131 ms. Remains : 52/182 places, 40/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9682315062109360153.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17241821691206435130.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9682315062109360153.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17241821691206435130.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5004,0.014308,4004,2,468,5,2967,6,0,248,2939,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(EF((p154==1)) U EF((p186==1))) U E(!((((p17==1)&&(p98==1))&&(p193==1))) U AG((((p81==1)&&(p139==1))&&(p193==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,E(E(TRUE U (p154==1)) U E(TRUE U (p186==1)))),!((((p17==1)&&(p98==1))&&(p193==1)))) * !(E(TRUE ...207
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t6, t13, t14, t19, t20, t26, t38, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. ...201
(forward)formula 0,0,0.083942,6908,1,0,85,19141,102,38,1533,13732,90
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 181 transition count 159
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 161 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 161 transition count 139
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 148 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 148 transition count 126
Applied a total of 67 rules in 4 ms. Remains 148 /182 variables (removed 34) and now considering 126/159 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 148 cols
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 210 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 125 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:24:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 118 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 11/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 5/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 126/274 variables, 148/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 83 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 81 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 5/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 5/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 2/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 274/274 variables, and 206 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 12331 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 148/148 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 30/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 126/274 variables, 148/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 125/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 95 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 5/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 1167 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 4/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 123 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 274/274 variables, and 341 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 13899 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 148/148 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 26276ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26279ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/182 places, 126/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26493 ms. Remains : 148/182 places, 126/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:24:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:24:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10348129322121445719.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9650139042850680131.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10348129322121445719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9650139042850680131.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.49099e+10,0.997998,33160,2,16449,5,105528,6,0,719,154015,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(E((p130==1) U (E((p55==1) U (p4==1)) * AX((((p10==1)&&(p118==1))&&(p193==1))))) U ((A((((p142==1)&&(p64==1))&&(p5!=1)) U !(EG((p63==...220
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(E((p130==1) U (E((p55==1) U (p4==1)) * !(EX(!((((p10==1)&&(p118==1))&&(p193==1))))))) U ...351
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t16, t25, t28, t32, t33, t35, t38, t41, t44, t47, t50, t55, t58, t62, t63, t67, t68, ...316
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,23.7369,541680,1,0,511,2.47624e+06,306,236,4434,2.71565e+06,559
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 162 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 162 transition count 139
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 162 transition count 138
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 149 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 149 transition count 125
Applied a total of 67 rules in 25 ms. Remains 149 /182 variables (removed 33) and now considering 125/159 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 149 cols
[2024-05-21 23:24:52] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:24:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:24:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:24:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 153 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 223 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:24:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 18/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 112 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 16/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 125/274 variables, 149/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 6/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 83 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 5/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 274/274 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 12503 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 18/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 37/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 125/274 variables, 149/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 124/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 247 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 8/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 4/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 3/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 274/274 variables, and 361 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 30037 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints]
After SMT, in 42559ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42561ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/182 places, 125/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42812 ms. Remains : 149/182 places, 125/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2743247647083031148.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6898628440603970065.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2743247647083031148.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6898628440603970065.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41909e+10,1.23929,31396,2,18664,5,102199,6,0,722,138866,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(E((((p62==1)&&(p124==1))&&(p185==1)) U (((EF((((p51==1)&&(p138==1))&&(p193==1))) * AX((p115==1))) * (AX((p75==1)) * (p101==1))) * (((...239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,E(E((((p62==1)&&(p124==1))&&(p185==1)) U (((E(TRUE U (((p51==1)&&(p138==1))&&(p193==1))) * !(EX...322
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t22, t25, t28, t31, t34, t38, t39, t41, t44, t47, t52, t55, t58, t62, t63, t66, t67, ...310
(forward)formula 0,1,15.5326,317044,1,0,282,1.15348e+06,290,130,4499,1.391e+06,280
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 107 edges and 182 vertex of which 7 / 182 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 344 edges and 176 vertex of which 175 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 173 transition count 116
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 139 transition count 115
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 138 transition count 115
Performed 28 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 28 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 138 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 104 transition count 87
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 85 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 85 transition count 68
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 85 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 84 transition count 67
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 50 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 49 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 48 transition count 34
Applied a total of 242 rules in 22 ms. Remains 48 /182 variables (removed 134) and now considering 34/159 (removed 125) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-21 23:25:50] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [0, 1, 6, 7, 8]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 101 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/182 places, 34/159 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 34/34 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 125 ms. Remains : 43/182 places, 34/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:25:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 34 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:25:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6743468035259424043.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7097570023393508148.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6743468035259424043.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7097570023393508148.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1248,0.013087,3632,2,256,5,1848,6,0,206,1223,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(A((p29==1) U (p142==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((E(!((p142==1)) U (!((p29==1)) * !((p142==1)))) + EG(!((p142==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t14, t18, t24, t25, t30, t31, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destro...194
(forward)formula 0,0,0.096909,7384,1,0,141,22246,98,75,1262,22648,174
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 181 transition count 159
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 162 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 162 transition count 140
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 162 transition count 139
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 149 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 149 transition count 126
Applied a total of 66 rules in 42 ms. Remains 149 /182 variables (removed 33) and now considering 126/159 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 149 cols
[2024-05-21 23:25:51] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:25:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:25:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:25:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 278 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 125 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:25:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 119 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 2366 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 286 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 8/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 967 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 4/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 5/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 126/275 variables, 149/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 6/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/275 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 275/275 variables, and 223 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 14313 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 46/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 4/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 126/275 variables, 149/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 125/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 3/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/275 variables, 0/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 275/275 variables, and 360 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 11361 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints]
After SMT, in 25698ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25701ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/182 places, 126/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26022 ms. Remains : 149/182 places, 126/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:26:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 23:26:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 23:26:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:26:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:26:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:26:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5882252501114195763.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:26:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12943009064858800676.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5882252501114195763.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12943009064858800676.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27364e+10,1.0917,34424,2,17022,5,110232,6,0,723,163887,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((p169==0) * AX((AG((p19==1)) + E((p8==1) U (p55==1))))) * (AG((p53==0)) * ((EF((p137==0)) + AG((p97!=1))) + ((p11==1)||(((p65==1)&&(...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p169==0) * !(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((p19==1)))) + E((p8==1) U (p55==1)))))))) * !(E(T...560
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t12, t25, t26, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t50, t51, t55, t58, t61, t65, t66, ...321
(forward)formula 0,1,12.6501,334308,1,0,392,1.35646e+06,284,190,4383,1.41182e+06,397
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 181 transition count 159
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 158 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 158 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 158 transition count 135
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 143 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 143 transition count 120
Applied a total of 78 rules in 4 ms. Remains 143 /182 variables (removed 39) and now considering 120/159 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 143 cols
[2024-05-21 23:26:29] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:26:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 219 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:26:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:26:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 192 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 414 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:26:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 18/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 5/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 165 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 11/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 263/263 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 13203 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 43/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/263 variables, 143/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 119/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 2/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 1/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/263 variables, 0/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 263/263 variables, and 345 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 13723 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints]
After SMT, in 26968ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26970ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 143/182 places, 120/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27388 ms. Remains : 143/182 places, 120/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-21 23:26:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:26:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17156909428395657013.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:26:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5601241111482130792.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17156909428395657013.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5601241111482130792.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24738e+10,0.587675,27148,2,14993,5,88735,6,0,693,119299,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AG((((p34==1)&&(p108==1))&&(p193==1)))) + AG(EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((p34==1)&&(p108==1))&&(p193==1)))))))))),TRUE) * !(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t22, t25, t28, t31, t34, t37, t40, t43, t46, t51, t54, t57, t61, t62, t65, t66, t69, ...301
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 23:27:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:27:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 23:27:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1785847169121381467.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1785847169121381467.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1785847169121381467.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1785847169121381467.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1785847169121381467.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 23:27:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 23:27:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 23:27:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:27:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-21 23:27:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 23:27:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability643919224609483293.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 23:27:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3012283573332609916.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability643919224609483293.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3012283573332609916.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24738e+10,0.109841,8888,1216,23,11769,296,352,12131,46,614,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AG((((i3.u11.p34==1)&&(i5.u32.p108==1))&&(i12.u47.p193==1)))) + AG(EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((i3.u11.p34==1)&&(i5.u32.p108==1))&&(i12.u47.p193==1)))))))))),TRUE) * !(...174
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t62, t66, t70, t74, t82, t110, t111, u33.t37, u34.t34, i0.u16.t65, i0.u25.t51, i0.u38.t22, i1...439
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,0,3.92001,149072,1,0,323446,403,2445,363383,236,972,540503
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 181 transition count 159
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 159 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 159 transition count 137
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 159 transition count 136
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 144 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 144 transition count 121
Applied a total of 76 rules in 10 ms. Remains 144 /182 variables (removed 38) and now considering 121/159 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 144 cols
[2024-05-21 23:27:31] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:27:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:27:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:27:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 269 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:27:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 12/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 3/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 3/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 121/265 variables, 144/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 2114 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 7/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 265/265 variables, and 208 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 18415 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 36/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 2/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 121/265 variables, 144/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 120/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 6/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 265/265 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 14024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints]
After SMT, in 32460ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 32463ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 144/182 places, 121/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32743 ms. Remains : 144/182 places, 121/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 23:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 23:28:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 23:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16423080738801881175.gal : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 23:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3827972846910960820.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16423080738801881175.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3827972846910960820.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26039e+10,0.836716,27920,2,15076,5,90868,6,0,698,123385,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((!(EF(((p3==1)&&(p90==1)))) * A((p96==1) U !((((p51==1)&&(p138==1))&&(p193==1))))) U AF(EG(!(AX((p80==1)))))) + E(EF(!(E((p82==1) U (p...183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U ((p3==1)&&(p90==1)))) * !((E(!(!((((p51==1)&&(p138==1))&&(p193==1)))) U (!((p96==1)) * ...375
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t13, t23, t26, t29, t32, t35, t38, t41, t44, t47, t52, t55, t58, t62, t63, t66, t67, ...306
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 23:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 23:28:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 23:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4186728424816143976.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4186728424816143976.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4186728424816143976.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4186728424816143976.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4186728424816143976.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 23:28:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 23:28:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 23:28:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-21 23:28:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 23:28:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7560788372069146340.gal : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 23:28:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10888821535111008635.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7560788372069146340.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10888821535111008635.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26039e+10,0.253913,7892,782,29,9400,345,339,11243,44,791,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((!(EF(((i12.i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i10.u30.p90==1)))) * A((i10.u32.p96==1) U !((((i5.u17.p51==1)&&(i12.i1.u40.p138==1))&&(i13.u41.p193==1)))))...271
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U ((i12.i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i10.u30.p90==1)))) * !((E(!(!((((i5.u17.p51==1)&&(i12.i1.u40.p138=...515
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t63, t67, t71, t75, t83, t112, i0.u13.t74, i1.u15.t70, i2.u7.t86, i3.u5.t89, i4.t82, i5.u17.t...463
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,5.38296,144908,1,0,275673,345,2190,343101,225,791,322495
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 159/159 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 181 transition count 159
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 159 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 159 transition count 137
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 159 transition count 136
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 145 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 145 transition count 122
Applied a total of 74 rules in 24 ms. Remains 145 /182 variables (removed 37) and now considering 122/159 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 145 cols
[2024-05-21 23:28:39] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:28:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 23:28:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 23:28:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 245 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:28:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 11/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 5/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 122/267 variables, 145/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 3/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 3/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 2/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/267 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 9108 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 25/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/267 variables, 145/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 121/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 2/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 23:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 2/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
[2024-05-21 23:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 1/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/267 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/267 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 14325 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints]
After SMT, in 23453ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23458ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 145/182 places, 122/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23734 ms. Remains : 145/182 places, 122/159 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:29:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 23:29:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:29:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:29:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:29:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 23:29:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7666391261847827032.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:29:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1207585160998808389.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7666391261847827032.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1207585160998808389.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28679e+10,0.926271,27088,2,15096,5,88758,6,0,703,118163,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(A(A(((p116==1)||(p167==1)) U (((p106==1)&&(p69==1))&&(p72==1))) U EF((p67==1))) U AX((p196==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((p196==1)))))) * !(!((E(!(E(TRUE U (p67==1))) U (!(!((E(!((((p106==1)&&(p69==1))&&(p72...410
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t12, t24, t27, t30, t33, t36, t39, t42, t45, t48, t53, t56, t59, t63, t64, t67, t68, ...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 23:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 23:29:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 23:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9619899821308662156.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9619899821308662156.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9619899821308662156.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9619899821308662156.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9619899821308662156.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 23:29:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 23:29:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 23:29:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 36 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 23:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-21 23:29:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 23:29:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14309339006446283834.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 23:29:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17210031353641217813.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14309339006446283834.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17210031353641217813.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28679e+10,0.143184,10516,1445,33,14938,390,378,16876,49,834,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(A(A(((i10.u35.p116==1)||(i13.u44.p167==1)) U (((i11.u33.p106==1)&&(i14.i0.u21.p69==1))&&(i14.i0.u22.p72==1))) U EF((i14.i1.u19.p67==1...184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((i13.u50.p196==1)))))) * !(!((E(!(E(TRUE U (i14.i1.u19.p67==1))) U (!(!((E(!((((i11.u3...573
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t64, t72, t76, t84, t113, i0.i0.u39.t24, i0.i1.u16.t67, i0.i1.u25.t53, i2.t68, i2.u12.t75, i2...468
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,29.2618,707496,1,0,1.50237e+06,610,2370,1.645e+06,260,1755,1527054
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-21 23:30:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 23:30:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Total runtime 657251 ms.

BK_STOP 1716334203377

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-01"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-01, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r048-tajo-171620399500450"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-01.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-01 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;