fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r048-tajo-171620398900170
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
1809.071 1121385.00 1207819.00 234.30 TFFTFTFTFFFFFFFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r048-tajo-171620398900170.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2' backing_fmt='qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r048-tajo-171620398900170
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.5M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 13 01:20 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K Apr 13 01:20 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Apr 13 01:18 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 238K Apr 13 01:18 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 13 01:27 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 127K Apr 13 01:27 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K Apr 13 01:26 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 417K Apr 13 01:26 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 223K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716325630326

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-21 21:07:11] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-21 21:07:11] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-21 21:07:11] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 81 ms
[2024-05-21 21:07:11] [INFO ] Transformed 48 places.
[2024-05-21 21:07:11] [INFO ] Transformed 288 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:07:11] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 48 places and 288 transitions and 2090 arcs in 184 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 26 ms.
Support contains 46 out of 48 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 48/48 places, 288/288 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 46 transition count 288
Applied a total of 2 rules in 28 ms. Remains 46 /48 variables (removed 2) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 285 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:07:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-21 21:07:12] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-05-21 21:07:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 285 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 21:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD201 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD267 is UNSAT
[2024-05-21 21:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 265 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 90/136 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 22/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 136/136 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved in 4669 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 285/285 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 90/136 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 22/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 263/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 136/136 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved in 7046 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/285 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 12234ms problems are : Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 22 dead transitions in 12266ms
Found 22 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 22 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) triggered by suspicious arc values removed 22 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:07:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-21 21:07:24] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-21 21:07:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 21:07:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:07:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:07:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 21:07:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/48 places, 266/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12468 ms. Remains : 46/48 places, 266/288 transitions.
Support contains 46 out of 46 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-21 21:07:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 88 ms
[2024-05-21 21:07:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2024-05-21 21:07:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (444 resets) in 5139 ms. (7 steps per ms) remains 36/83 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 190 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (16 resets) in 68 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (15 resets) in 63 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (14 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (15 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (16 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 35/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (15 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (16 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (13 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (15 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (15 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (16 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (13 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (15 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (16 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 65 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (12 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (15 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (19 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (13 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (16 resets) in 67 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (15 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (13 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (15 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (16 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (16 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
[2024-05-21 21:07:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:07:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:07:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp61 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp63 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp74 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp80 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 28 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/44 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 86/131 variables, 45/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved in 612 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 11/40 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 27 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
[2024-05-21 21:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp51 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp79 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 84/125 variables, 41/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 20/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 7/132 variables, 5/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 22/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved in 968 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/34 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1731ms problems are : Problem set: 12 solved, 22 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 532 ms.
Support contains 25 out of 46 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 43 transition count 264
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 41 transition count 262
Applied a total of 9 rules in 44 ms. Remains 41 /46 variables (removed 5) and now considering 262/266 (removed 4) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 41/46 places, 262/266 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (616 resets) in 483 ms. (82 steps per ms) remains 17/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (28 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (27 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (25 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (24 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (26 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (26 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (25 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (24 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (24 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (24 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (27 resets) in 28 ms. (137 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 38 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (24 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (28 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (27 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (25 resets) in 53 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (27 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
[2024-05-21 21:07:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 41 cols
[2024-05-21 21:07:30] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:07:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 14/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/121 variables, 39/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 2/123 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 123/123 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 357 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 14/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/121 variables, 39/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 17/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/123 variables, 2/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 123/123 variables, and 84 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 649 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1029ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 358 ms.
Support contains 24 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 262/262 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 262/262 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 19 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 262/262 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (619 resets) in 367 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 12/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (273 resets) in 191 ms. (208 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (272 resets) in 156 ms. (254 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (265 resets) in 177 ms. (224 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (282 resets) in 219 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (276 resets) in 208 ms. (191 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (264 resets) in 124 ms. (320 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (265 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (267 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (282 resets) in 157 ms. (253 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (266 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (285 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (289 resets) in 96 ms. (412 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2024-05-21 21:07:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:07:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:07:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 19/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/121 variables, 39/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 2/123 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 123/123 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved in 325 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 19/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/121 variables, 39/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 12/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/123 variables, 2/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 123/123 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved in 480 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 823ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 880 ms.
Support contains 19 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 262/262 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 262/262 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 262/262 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (618 resets) in 265 ms. (150 steps per ms) remains 11/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (276 resets) in 188 ms. (211 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (271 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (268 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (284 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (277 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (261 resets) in 176 ms. (225 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (264 resets) in 117 ms. (339 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (270 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (278 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (266 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (289 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 63294 states, properties seen :9
Probabilistic random walk after 226115 steps, saw 63294 distinct states, run finished after 838 ms. (steps per millisecond=269 ) properties seen :9
Explored full state space saw : 63294 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 226115 steps, saw 63294 distinct states, run finished after 798 ms. (steps per millisecond=283 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 14 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-21 21:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2024-05-21 21:07:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2024-05-21 21:07:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
Computed a total of 29 stabilizing places and 42 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:07:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-21 21:07:37] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 21:07:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4732 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 9574 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 14601ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14604ms
[2024-05-21 21:07:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:07:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:07:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 21:07:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:07:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:07:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 21:07:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 21:07:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:07:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:07:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:07:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4576 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 6840 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 11733ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11737ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26491 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:08:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 21:08:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-21 21:08:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:08:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 21:08:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 21:08:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15448786315534189876.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 21:08:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6290177216434830884.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15448786315534189876.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6290177216434830884.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,19.7582,507104,2,201548,5,390601,6,0,452,710550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((AF((EG(((((((NB_ATTENTE_B_10<1)||(ROUTE_B<1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_4<1)||(ROUTE_B<1)))&&(((NB_ATTENTE_B_5<1)||(ROUTE_B<1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_...12472
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!((EG(((((((NB_ATTENTE_B_10<1)||(ROUTE_B<1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_4<1)||(ROUTE_B<1)))&&(((NB_ATTENT...12103
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
[2024-05-21 21:08:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-21 21:08:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:08:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11197665055841271767.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11197665055841271767.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11197665055841271767.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11197665055841271767.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11197665055841271767.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:08:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:08:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:08:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 575 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:08:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 113 ms
[2024-05-21 21:08:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 105 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:08:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9528502559406587005.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 21:08:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7427758208721357686.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9528502559406587005.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7427758208721357686.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.40032,42720,2040,798,57487,8207,213,233456,122,45267,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((AF((EG(((((((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_10<1)||(i1.u5.ROUTE_B<1))&&((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_4<1)||(i1.u5.ROUTE_B<1)))&&(((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_5<1...16042
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!((EG(((((((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_10<1)||(i1.u5.ROUTE_B<1))&&((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_4<1)||(i1.u5.RO...16327
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t55, t87, t95, t177, t185, t197, t205, i0.t135, i0.t126, i0.t54, i1.u2.t10...266
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:09:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:09:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:09:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4488 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7660 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 12516ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12521ms
[2024-05-21 21:09:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:09:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:09:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 21:09:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:09:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:09:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 21:09:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:09:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:09:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:09:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4240 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7621 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 12163ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12166ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24838 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:09:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:09:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:09:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:09:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:09:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 21:09:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7827926017121417041.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 21:09:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12409805960261890852.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7827926017121417041.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12409805960261890852.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,24.5985,507600,2,201548,5,390601,6,0,452,710550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF(!(E(AX((SUR_PONT_B>=1)) U !((((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_2>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1)))))))) * EG(EF(((AG(AF((SUR_PONT_B>...2487
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * EG(E(TRUE U !(E(!(EX(!((SUR_PONT_B>=1)))) U !((((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_2>=1)&&(C...1608
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 21:09:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:09:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:09:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8935360108107145488.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8935360108107145488.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8935360108107145488.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8935360108107145488.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8935360108107145488.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:09:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:09:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:09:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 545 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:09:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-21 21:09:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 117 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:09:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3888387268164584805.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 21:09:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1164257585397275811.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3888387268164584805.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1164257585397275811.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.11103,29784,953,773,39262,6962,190,117872,131,43039,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF(!(E(AX((i0.u1.SUR_PONT_B>=1)) U !((((i1.u4.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i1.u5.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i2.u3.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i1.u5.COMPTEUR_10>=1)))))))...3255
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * EG(E(TRUE U !(E(!(EX(!((i0.u1.SUR_PONT_B>=1)))) U !((((i1.u4.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i1.u5.COMPTEUR_10>=1))|...3340
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t55, t99, t105, t179, t185, t199, t205, i0.u1.t10, i0.u1.t23, i1.t135, i1....267
(forward)formula 0,0,21.246,285032,1,0,359572,47304,1171,1.90184e+06,838,255808,309745
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:10:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:10:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:10:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4118 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7281 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 11765ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11771ms
[2024-05-21 21:10:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:10:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:10:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [12]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 11818 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 21:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 21:10:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:10:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10601150617600148364.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 21:10:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9880457870892924481.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10601150617600148364.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9880457870892924481.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,18.3094,344948,2,127229,5,450360,6,0,448,553031,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(EG(AX((((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_2>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1)))))) * AF(EX(((E((((((((CAPACITE>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&...10836
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!(EX(!((((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_2>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))))))))))) * !(...9643
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
[2024-05-21 21:11:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-21 21:11:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:11:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12168442209238558633.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12168442209238558633.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12168442209238558633.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12168442209238558633.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12168442209238558633.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:11:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:11:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:11:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 494 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:11:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2024-05-21 21:11:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 132 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:11:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5749313328708044300.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:11:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16997928459810729857.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5749313328708044300.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16997928459810729857.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.05415,45932,1693,631,55161,3722,156,208207,153,18136,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(EG(AX((((i0.u0.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i0.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i2.u3.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i0.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1)))))) * AF(EX(((E((((((((i1.u2.CAP...13878
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!(EX(!((((i0.u0.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i0.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i2.u3.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i0.u0.COMPTE...13941
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t55, t197, t205, t247, t255, i0.t106, i0.t54, i1.u2.t10, i1.u2.t23, Inter...247
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:11:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:11:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:11:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7397 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 11743ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11748ms
[2024-05-21 21:11:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:11:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:11:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 21:11:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:11:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:11:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 21:11:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:11:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:11:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:11:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4767 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 6809 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 11834ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11838ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23677 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:11:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 21:11:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-21 21:11:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:11:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 21:11:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 21:11:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5635711675899619872.gal : 16 ms
[2024-05-21 21:11:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10482369795401310362.ctl : 19 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5635711675899619872.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10482369795401310362.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,21.1951,507448,2,201548,5,390601,6,0,452,710550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG((((EF(((((((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))||(((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1))||((ROUTE_...13104
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG((((E(TRUE U ((((((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))||(((...11471
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 21:12:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-21 21:12:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:12:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8676433569986340766.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8676433569986340766.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8676433569986340766.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8676433569986340766.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8676433569986340766.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:12:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:12:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:12:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 577 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:12:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2024-05-21 21:12:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 113 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:12:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17555247702136481386.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:12:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11052414795450977505.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17555247702136481386.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11052414795450977505.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,0.627542,25044,790,476,31988,4186,178,103964,116,20515,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG((((EF(((((((i0.u0.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((i0.u0.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1)))||(((i0.u0.ROUTE_A>=1)&&...16998
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG((((E(TRUE U ((((((i0.u0.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))||((i0.u0.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(i0.u0.N...19211
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t54, t86, t95, t126, t135, t166, t175, i0.u2.t10, i0.u2.t23, i1.t245, i1.t...266
(forward)formula 0,1,29.0098,369504,1,0,463579,38791,1823,2.5468e+06,811,263969,392789
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:12:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:12:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:12:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 3989 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7210 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 11436ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11440ms
[2024-05-21 21:13:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:13:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:13:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 21:13:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:13:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:13:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 21:13:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 21:13:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:13:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:13:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:13:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4311 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7097 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 11677ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11680ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23265 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:13:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 21:13:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 21:13:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:13:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 21:13:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 21:13:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability50848921515177094.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 21:13:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16803408235773849804.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability50848921515177094.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16803408235773849804.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,19.0394,507880,2,201548,5,390601,6,0,452,710550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AG(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_2>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=...41812
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(C...44203
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
[2024-05-21 21:13:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-21 21:13:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:13:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5039801820427332746.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5039801820427332746.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5039801820427332746.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5039801820427332746.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5039801820427332746.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:13:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:13:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:13:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 577 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:13:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2024-05-21 21:13:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 113 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:13:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12866904649254835529.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:13:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9548972171359563439.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12866904649254835529.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9548972171359563439.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.21881,39028,885,482,60446,9039,184,140706,113,57510,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AG(((((((((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i2.u2.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i2.u2.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((i0.u0.NB_AT...53548
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i2.u2.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i2.u2.NB_A...56868
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t54, t62, t65, t152, t155, t172, t175, i0.u1.t10, i0.u1.t23, i2.t255, i2.t...266
(forward)formula 0,0,1.60752,39292,1,0,60446,9909,2162,140706,777,57510,43725
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:13:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:13:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:13:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 3912 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7560 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 11746ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11751ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:14:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:14:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 21:14:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:14:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:14:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 21:14:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:14:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:14:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:14:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4210 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 6393 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 10862ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10865ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 22757 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:14:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:14:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1319873450902387710.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10116201976420206367.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1319873450902387710.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10116201976420206367.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,18.3457,506840,2,201548,5,390601,6,0,452,710550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((AX((SUR_PONT_B<1)) + EF(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0<1)||(CONTROLEUR_1<1))||((NB_ATTENTE_B_3<1)||(COMPTEUR_7<1)))&&(((NB_ATTENTE_A_0<...20140
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((!(EX(!((SUR_PONT_B<1)))) + E(TRUE U ((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0<1)||(CONTROLEU...53587
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
[2024-05-21 21:14:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:14:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3596950141508967187.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3596950141508967187.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3596950141508967187.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3596950141508967187.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3596950141508967187.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:14:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:14:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:14:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 577 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:14:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 113 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:14:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12833130088937708327.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12917167691339638000.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12833130088937708327.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12917167691339638000.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.49112,38504,885,482,59299,9395,185,141393,118,60746,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((AX((i0.u1.SUR_PONT_B<1)) + EF(((((((((((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_0<1)||(i1.u3.CONTROLEUR_1<1))||((i1.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_3<1)||(i2.u5.COMPT...26068
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((!(EX(!((i0.u1.SUR_PONT_B<1)))) + E(TRUE U ((((((((((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_0<1)...73218
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t54, t62, t65, t152, t155, t172, t175, i0.u1.t10, i0.u1.t23, i2.t255, i2.t...266
(forward)formula 0,1,3.05932,39032,1,0,59299,12450,1479,162570,762,60746,74672
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:14:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:14:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:14:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 3917 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 6498 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 10674ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10679ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:14:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:14:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [28]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 76 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 10762 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:14:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:14:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability428470437575025547.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:14:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18173844372979556347.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability428470437575025547.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18173844372979556347.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,17.9514,431980,2,126696,5,527444,6,0,448,723125,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(A((A((((CAPACITE>=10)&&(VIDANGE_2>=1))||((CAPACITE>=10)&&(VIDANGE_1>=1))) U ((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_...10394
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!((E(!(EX((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(ATTENTE_A>=1))&&((CAPACITE>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((NB_A...30565
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
[2024-05-21 21:15:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-21 21:15:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:15:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9205980982158427890.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9205980982158427890.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9205980982158427890.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9205980982158427890.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9205980982158427890.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:15:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:15:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:15:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 515 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:15:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 63 ms
[2024-05-21 21:15:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 94 labels/synchronizations in 16 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:15:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3026591620595998764.gal : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 21:15:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability632610307007486841.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3026591620595998764.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability632610307007486841.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.81037,38996,894,924,33647,15981,152,92595,147,256175,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(A((A((((i0.u2.CAPACITE>=10)&&(u3.VIDANGE_2>=1))||((i0.u2.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i2.u1.VIDANGE_1>=1))) U ((((((((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)...13271
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!((E(!(EX((((((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(i0.u0.ATTENTE_A>=1))&&((i0.u2.CAPACITE>=1)&&(u3.CONTRO...39608
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t54, t151, t155, t171, t175, i0.u2.t10, i0.u2.t23, i2.t235, i2.t228, i2.t5...256
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,27.6447,485012,1,0,424883,99340,1431,1.6683e+06,957,4.19686e+06,395098
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:15:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:15:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:15:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4251 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 6802 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 11308ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11312ms
[2024-05-21 21:16:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:16:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:16:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [12]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 11363 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:16:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 21:16:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-21 21:16:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:16:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:16:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:16:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1410426280204446757.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:16:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15059985893217683850.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1410426280204446757.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15059985893217683850.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,18.1199,345656,2,127229,5,450360,6,0,448,553031,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((!(A((((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_3>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_7>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1...30069
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((((CAPACITE>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(A...60042
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
[2024-05-21 21:16:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2024-05-21 21:16:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:16:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5630161264479240952.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5630161264479240952.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5630161264479240952.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5630161264479240952.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5630161264479240952.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:16:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:16:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:16:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 585 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:16:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 63 ms
[2024-05-21 21:16:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 110 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:16:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1279282739220027362.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 21:16:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5773519222059336497.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1279282739220027362.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5773519222059336497.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,8.93039,168352,2099,726,120382,17228,188,1.52182e+06,126,126914,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((!(A((((((((((((i0.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i0.u5.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i2.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_3>=1)&&(i0.u0.COMPTEUR_7>=1)))||(((i0.u5.NB_...38481
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((((i2.u2.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i1.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i2.u3.NB_A...80274
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t55, t87, t95, t207, t215, t247, t255, i0.t135, i0.t126, i0.t54, i2.u2.t10...266
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 265/266 (removed 1) transitions.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:17:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 45 cols
[2024-05-21 21:17:08] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 4217 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 262/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 5711 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 10134ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10136ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:17:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:17:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 265/265 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 10209 ms. Remains : 43/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13590890967960377799.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14305791108743933222.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13590890967960377799.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14305791108743933222.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,22.0441,536892,2,60230,5,817141,6,0,439,1.03369e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0<1)||(CONTROLEUR_1<1))||((NB_ATTENTE_B_9<1)||(COMPTEUR_8<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0<1)||(CONTROLEUR_1<1))||((NB_ATTENTE_B_9<1)||(COMPTEUR_8<1)))))] = FA...158
(forward)formula 0,0,24.8483,536892,1,0,9,817141,9,2,830,1.03369e+06,2
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 265/266 (removed 1) transitions.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:17:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:17:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:17:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 3827 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 262/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 6287 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 10476ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10482ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:17:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:17:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 76 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 265/265 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 10566 ms. Remains : 43/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11540012426101158314.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 21:17:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16062329669922236518.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11540012426101158314.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16062329669922236518.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 21:18:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-21 21:18:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:18:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16376459323017810231.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16376459323017810231.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16376459323017810231.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16376459323017810231.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16376459323017810231.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:18:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:18:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:18:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 587 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:18:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2024-05-21 21:18:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 108 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:18:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability987221845741773147.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:18:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability838012782501954706.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability987221845741773147.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability838012782501954706.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...260
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,3.64999,79584,1011,391,117060,9423,179,440073,108,83785,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AG(((!(E((((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i2.u5.COMPTEUR_9>=1))) U (((i2.u4.NB_ATT...912
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(E((((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=...1269
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t23, t54, t112, t114, t162, t164, t252, t254, i1.u1.t10, i2.t74, i2.t67, i2.t53...255
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 265/266 (removed 1) transitions.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:18:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:18:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:18:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 4174 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 262/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 6315 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 10810ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10816ms
[2024-05-21 21:19:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:19:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:19:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 83 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 265/265 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 10916 ms. Remains : 43/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:19:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 21:19:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 21:19:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:19:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 21:19:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 21:19:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8351968325631395592.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 21:19:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9891881290361823558.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8351968325631395592.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9891881290361823558.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,23.2779,536252,2,60230,5,817141,6,0,439,1.03369e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 21:19:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-21 21:19:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:19:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17179712406445979906.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17179712406445979906.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17179712406445979906.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17179712406445979906.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17179712406445979906.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:19:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:19:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:19:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 614 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:19:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-21 21:19:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 108 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:19:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability764697954129900700.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 21:19:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3316481383206951538.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability764697954129900700.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3316481383206951538.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.62672,56316,833,588,77809,14555,154,300615,113,109603,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(EX(AX((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i0.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(i2.u5.COMPTEUR_8>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U EX(!(EX(!((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i0.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&...195
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t23, t53, t122, t124, t192, t194, i1.u2.t10, i2.t254, i2.t247, i2.t54, Interse...245
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,25.9311,590808,1,0,662964,128196,688,4.16595e+06,696,1.21357e+06,373673
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 265/266 (removed 1) transitions.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:20:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:20:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:20:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 3992 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 262/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 6708 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 10899ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10902ms
[2024-05-21 21:20:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:20:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:20:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 70 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 265/265 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 10976 ms. Remains : 43/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:20:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 21:20:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 21:20:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:20:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 21:20:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 21:20:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9235914871420591879.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:20:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13270570258582465548.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9235914871420591879.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13270570258582465548.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,22.4521,536912,2,60230,5,817141,6,0,439,1.03369e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 21:20:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-21 21:20:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:20:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1975803264201294107.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1975803264201294107.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1975803264201294107.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1975803264201294107.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1975803264201294107.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:20:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:20:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:20:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 487 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:20:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2024-05-21 21:20:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 82 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:20:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5627391182376208486.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:20:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7443426161179987049.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5627391182376208486.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7443426161179987049.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,3.34736,110060,755,890,137790,15397,142,824317,155,117277,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(AF((((i1.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1)&&(i1.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(u3.COMPTEUR_9>=1))))) + EX(((AG(((i1.u1.ROUTE...1115
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !((EG(!(EG(!((((i1.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1)&&(i1.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&...2277
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t23, t53, t54, t70, t165, t174, t185, t194, i1.u2.t10, Intersection with reach...229
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 43 transition count 264
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 41 transition count 262
Applied a total of 9 rules in 48 ms. Remains 41 /46 variables (removed 5) and now considering 262/266 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:21:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 41 cols
[2024-05-21 21:21:13] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned [12, 26]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/46 places, 262/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 39 /39 variables (removed 0) and now considering 262/262 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 157 ms. Remains : 39/46 places, 262/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:21:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 262 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:21:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6541493208648695209.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3165541058196251955.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6541493208648695209.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3165541058196251955.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,63294,1.88436,52744,2,9294,5,100249,6,0,419,109422,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_8>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_8>=1)))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 125/0/137
(forward)formula 0,0,13.1459,316216,1,0,109,1.05034e+06,19,3,2539,767082,108
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 265/266 (removed 1) transitions.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:21:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 45 cols
[2024-05-21 21:21:26] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 4533 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 262/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 5897 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 10659ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10661ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 87 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 265/265 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 10753 ms. Remains : 43/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13858782059734030157.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 21:21:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14367732707970567931.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13858782059734030157.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14367732707970567931.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 21:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 21:22:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8342697803969871952.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8342697803969871952.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8342697803969871952.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8342697803969871952.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8342697803969871952.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:22:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:22:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:22:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 523 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-21 21:22:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 89 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:22:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1119105153612910281.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 21:22:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13474494953177423573.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1119105153612910281.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13474494953177423573.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.8979,61120,1723,979,47911,17589,151,285138,140,275226,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i0.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_6>=1)&&(i0.u2.COMPTEUR_3>=1)))&&(((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0<...248
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(EG(!(((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i0.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_6>=1)&&(i0.u2...304
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t23, t54, t112, t114, t212, t214, i0.t144, i0.t141, i0.t53, i1.u1.t10, Interse...245
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 265/266 (removed 1) transitions.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:22:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:22:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:22:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 60 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 4892 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 262/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 7702 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 12943ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12949ms
[2024-05-21 21:22:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:22:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:22:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [28]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 265/265 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 13052 ms. Remains : 44/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:22:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-21 21:22:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 21:22:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:22:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 21:22:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 21:22:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17968267897844033084.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:22:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3276578684849908431.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17968267897844033084.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3276578684849908431.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,29.1786,540896,2,142349,5,711996,6,0,443,1.02111e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 21:23:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 21:23:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:23:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1052501062144255326.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1052501062144255326.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1052501062144255326.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1052501062144255326.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1052501062144255326.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:23:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:23:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:23:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 478 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:23:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2024-05-21 21:23:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 81 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:23:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9501025969114778691.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 21:23:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1218633938454103468.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9501025969114778691.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1218633938454103468.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,0.249354,14260,795,779,12107,9175,136,20227,163,74527,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF((EF(((u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_8>=1)&&(u4.ROUTE_B>=1))) * !(A(((u3.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(u2.COMPTEUR_6>=1)) U (((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_10>=1)&&(u3.CONTRO...922
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * EG(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U ((u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_8>=1)&&(u4.ROUTE_B>=1))) * !(!((E(!((((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_10>=1)...1324
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t23, t53, t54, t121, t221, t224, t251, t254, i1.u1.t10, Intersection with reac...230
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,15.7174,280144,1,0,347029,75741,799,833929,1128,2.0688e+06,440753
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:23:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-21 21:23:36] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:23:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4449 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 21:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 9534 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 14329ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14332ms
[2024-05-21 21:23:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 21:23:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 21:23:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 14420 ms. Remains : 44/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:23:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 21:23:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 21:23:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2024-05-21 21:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 21:23:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15357084532211956977.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 21:23:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1276752873835917118.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15357084532211956977.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1276752873835917118.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,22.8834,446212,2,58851,5,761719,6,0,444,801294,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 21:24:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 21:24:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:24:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7583923717878471592.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7583923717878471592.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7583923717878471592.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7583923717878471592.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7583923717878471592.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:24:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:24:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:24:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 524 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:24:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-05-21 21:24:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 89 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:24:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8498171699417539826.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 21:24:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13517600154059494373.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8498171699417539826.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13517600154059494373.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.8175,41852,890,851,37792,15551,146,97099,137,264944,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(A((A((((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u3.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_2>=1)&&(i1.u4.COMPTEUR_1>=1))) U (i0.u1.SUR_PONT_B>=1)) * ...434
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u3.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((u3.NB_ATTENTE...828
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t54, t150, t155, t180, t185, i0.u1.t10, i0.u1.t23, i1.t165, i1.t158, i1.t5...256
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 21:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-21 21:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-21 21:24:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 21:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14775377794893288846.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14775377794893288846.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14775377794893288846.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14775377794893288846.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14775377794893288846.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 21:24:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 21:24:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 21:24:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 577 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 21:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2024-05-21 21:24:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 113 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 21:24:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9285385140007695433.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 21:24:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1507108896426938147.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9285385140007695433.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1507108896426938147.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.61759,35332,888,482,53428,8445,188,118169,117,54651,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((AF((EG(((((((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_B_10<1)||(i1.u5.ROUTE_B<1))&&((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_4<1)||(i1.u5.ROUTE_B<1)))&&(((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_5<1...16042
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!((EG(((((((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_B_10<1)||(i1.u5.ROUTE_B<1))&&((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_4<1)||(i1.u5.RO...16327
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t54, t94, t95, t134, t135, t224, t225, i0.u2.t10, i0.u2.t23, i2.t245, i2.t...266
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,22.7581,380348,1,0,618036,65593,1366,1.73531e+06,836,595863,454988
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EX((AF(EG(AX((((i1.u0.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i2.u3.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i2.u4.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i2.u3.COMPTEUR_10>=1)))))) * AF(EX(((E((((((((i0.u2.CAP...13878
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!(EX(!((((i1.u0.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i2.u3.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i2.u4.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i2.u3.COMPTE...13941
(forward)formula 1,0,34.4313,537692,1,0,856514,91284,2028,2.3049e+06,873,786931,625688
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(((!(A((((((((((((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i1.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_3>=1)&&(i2.u3.COMPTEUR_7>=1)))||(((i1.u0.NB_...38481
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((((i0.u2.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i2.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u5.NB_A...80274
(forward)formula 2,1,38.0249,588380,1,0,951203,96078,2886,2.44719e+06,906,807011,718677
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EX((AG(((!(E((((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i1.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i2.u3.COMPTEUR_9>=1))) U (((i1.u0.NB_ATT...912
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(E((((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i1.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=...1269
(forward)formula 3,0,45.6049,640652,1,0,1.00387e+06,104245,2936,2.5598e+06,910,861548,776300
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: ((EG(AF((((i0.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1)&&(i2.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i2.u3.COMPTEUR_9>=1))))) + EX(((AG(((i0.u1.RO...1190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !((EG(!(EG(!((((i0.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1)&&(i2.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&...2433
(forward)formula 4,0,55.2539,695300,1,0,1.04693e+06,110019,3009,2.66989e+06,913,904408,828210
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF(((((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i1.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_6>=1)&&(i2.u3.COMPTEUR_3>=1)))&&(((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0<...248
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(EG(!(((((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i1.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_6>=1)&&(i2.u3...304
(forward)formula 5,0,59.7973,718796,1,0,1.05943e+06,112597,3023,2.72954e+06,913,929420,846734
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((EX(A((A((((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i1.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i1.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_2>=1)&&(i2.u3.COMPTEUR_1>=1))) U (i0.u2.SUR_PONT_...452
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((i1.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i1.u0.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i1.u5.N...864
(forward)formula 6,0,60.0017,721964,1,0,1.06407e+06,112712,3044,2.74033e+06,913,929967,856271
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1119970 ms.

BK_STOP 1716326751711

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r048-tajo-171620398900170"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10.tgz
mv BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;