Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r048-tajo-171620398600010.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2' backing_fmt='qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r048-tajo-171620398600010
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 464K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K Apr 13 01:19 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K Apr 13 01:19 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Apr 13 01:17 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K Apr 13 01:17 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 13 01:27 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K Apr 13 01:27 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 13 01:26 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K Apr 13 01:26 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716320746322

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-21 19:45:47] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-21 19:45:47] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-21 19:45:47] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-21 19:45:48] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-21 19:45:48] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 881 ms
[2024-05-21 19:45:48] [INFO ] Imported 15 HL places and 11 HL transitions for a total of 48 PT places and 5438.0 transition bindings in 20 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 15 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:45:48] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 15 places and 11 transitions 56 arcs in 4 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:45:48] [INFO ] Skeletonized 3 HLPN properties in 2 ms. Removed 13 properties that had guard overlaps.
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 51 edges and 15 vertex of which 13 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Remains 2 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 22 edges and 12 vertex of which 10 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.14 ms
RANDOM walk for 3502 steps (1 resets) in 62 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
[2024-05-21 19:45:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2024-05-21 19:45:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Arc [13:1*[(MOD (ADD $cpt 1) 11)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort compteur
Arc [1:1*[(MOD (ADD $cA 1) 11)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort voitureA
Arc [6:1*[(MOD (ADD (MOD (MINUS $cB 1) 11) 11) 11)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort voitureB
Arc [14:1*[(MOD (ADD $s 1) 2)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort sens
[2024-05-21 19:45:49] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 48 places and 288 transitions 2090 arcs in 66 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:45:49] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 4 ms.
Support contains 46 out of 48 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 48/48 places, 288/288 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 46 transition count 288
Applied a total of 2 rules in 24 ms. Remains 46 /48 variables (removed 2) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 285 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:45:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-21 19:45:49] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-21 19:45:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 285 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 179 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 19:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 437 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD201 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD267 is UNSAT
[2024-05-21 19:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 477 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 265 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 90/136 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 22/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 136/136 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved in 8005 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 285/285 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 90/136 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 22/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 263/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 136/136 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved in 18080 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/285 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 26861ms problems are : Problem set: 22 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 22 dead transitions in 26948ms
Found 22 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 22 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) triggered by suspicious arc values removed 22 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:46:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-21 19:46:16] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:46:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:46:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:46:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:46:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:46:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 195 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/48 places, 266/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27309 ms. Remains : 46/48 places, 266/288 transitions.
Support contains 46 out of 46 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-21 19:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 99 ms
[2024-05-21 19:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
[2024-05-21 19:46:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 31 to 29
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (443 resets) in 5850 ms. (6 steps per ms) remains 3/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (180 resets) in 929 ms. (43 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (180 resets) in 687 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (150 resets) in 619 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2024-05-21 19:46:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:46:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:46:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/43 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 86/130 variables, 44/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/132 variables, 2/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 133 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 19/43 variables, 5/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 86/130 variables, 44/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 91 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 2/132 variables, 2/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 1599 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/3 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1823ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 35 ms.
Support contains 24 out of 46 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Applied a total of 2 rules in 53 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 265/266 (removed 1) transitions.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:46:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 45 cols
[2024-05-21 19:46:22] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:46:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 5680 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 262/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 8127 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 14304ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14312ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 14367 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (508 resets) in 743 ms. (53 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (187 resets) in 1148 ms. (34 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 164516 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 664718 steps, saw 164516 distinct states, run finished after 1830 ms. (steps per millisecond=363 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 164516 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 664718 steps, saw 164516 distinct states, run finished after 1416 ms. (steps per millisecond=469 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-21 19:46:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2024-05-21 19:46:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
[2024-05-21 19:46:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
Computed a total of 29 stabilizing places and 42 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 37 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:46:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-21 19:46:41] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:46:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 75 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 19:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 2/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 5883 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7200 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 13553ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13558ms
[2024-05-21 19:46:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:46:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:46:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:46:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:46:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:46:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:46:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 19:46:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 13 ms returned []
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:46:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:46:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:46:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 83 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 5027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7728 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13189ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13194ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26948 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-21 19:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2024-05-21 19:47:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-21 19:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-21 19:47:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17742939045063439785.gal : 30 ms
[2024-05-21 19:47:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5911755513356659826.ctl : 17 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17742939045063439785.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5911755513356659826.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,22.9051,494732,2,197803,5,390581,6,0,452,700619,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((AF((EG(((((((NB_ATTENTE_B_9<1)||(ROUTE_B<1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_3<1)||(ROUTE_B<1)))&&(((NB_ATTENTE_B_8<1)||(ROUTE_B<1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B...12472
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!((EG(((((((NB_ATTENTE_B_9<1)||(ROUTE_B<1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_3<1)||(ROUTE_B<1)))&&(((NB_ATTENTE...12103
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
[2024-05-21 19:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-21 19:47:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3771295277668440461.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3771295277668440461.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3771295277668440461.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3771295277668440461.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3771295277668440461.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:47:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:47:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:47:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 538 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 109 ms
[2024-05-21 19:47:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 112 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:47:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12955338529334521738.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:47:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5654491841113864600.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12955338529334521738.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5654491841113864600.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,11.5861,165956,5759,946,230917,7554,174,669198,135,66081,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((AF((EG(((((((u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9<1)||(i2.u3.ROUTE_B<1))&&((i2.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_3<1)||(i2.u3.ROUTE_B<1)))&&(((u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_8<1)||(i2....15844
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!((EG(((((((u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9<1)||(i2.u3.ROUTE_B<1))&&((i2.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_3<1)||(i2.u3.ROUTE_...16123
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t54, t55, t92, t93, t152, t153, t159, t165, i1.t225, i1.t224, i2.u0.t10, i...263
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:48:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:48:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:48:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 5001 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7247 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12583ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12589ms
[2024-05-21 19:48:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:48:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:48:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:48:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:48:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:48:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:48:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:48:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:48:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:48:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4055 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 8485 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12846ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12850ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25630 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:48:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2024-05-21 19:48:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2024-05-21 19:48:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:48:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-21 19:48:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-21 19:48:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1925728050023677888.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 19:48:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8964110643026943922.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1925728050023677888.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8964110643026943922.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,17.6915,494376,2,197803,5,390581,6,0,452,700619,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF(!(E(AX((SUR_PONT_B>=1)) U !((((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1)))))))) * EG(EF(((AG(AF((SUR_PONT_B>...2487
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * EG(E(TRUE U !(E(!(EX(!((SUR_PONT_B>=1)))) U !((((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(C...1608
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
[2024-05-21 19:49:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-21 19:49:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:49:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7429072589703727160.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7429072589703727160.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7429072589703727160.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7429072589703727160.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7429072589703727160.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:49:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:49:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:49:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 479 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:49:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2024-05-21 19:49:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 131 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:49:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13289332717869805223.gal : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 19:49:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1510106144443189662.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13289332717869805223.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1510106144443189662.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:49:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:49:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:49:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 10132 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 14594ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14598ms
[2024-05-21 19:49:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:49:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:49:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [13]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 14679 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-21 19:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 19:49:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-21 19:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-21 19:49:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3883024867121825352.gal : 28 ms
[2024-05-21 19:49:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4101704134993115627.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3883024867121825352.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4101704134993115627.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,13.4673,328860,2,121585,5,435998,6,0,448,533487,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(EG(AX((((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1)))))) * AF(EX(((E((((((((CAPACITE>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)...10836
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!(EX(!((((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))))))))))) * !(...9643
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:50:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-21 19:50:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:50:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17587877216394188614.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17587877216394188614.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17587877216394188614.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17587877216394188614.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17587877216394188614.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:50:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:50:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:50:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 586 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:50:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 64 ms
[2024-05-21 19:50:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 110 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:50:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9848765329746827458.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:50:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2641615510805854832.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9848765329746827458.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2641615510805854832.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.87691,63004,1056,649,88371,15632,189,337399,125,101426,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(EG(AX((((i2.u0.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i0.u5.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_10>=1)))))) * AF(EX(((E((((((((i1.u2.CAP...13878
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!(EX(!((((i2.u0.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i0.u5.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTE...13941
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t55, t102, t152, t160, t165, t220, t225, i1.u2.t10, i1.u2.t23, i2.t155, i2...268
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:50:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:50:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:50:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4076 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7506 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 11899ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11903ms
[2024-05-21 19:51:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:51:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:51:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:51:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:51:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:51:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:51:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:51:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:51:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:51:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 3873 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 8082 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12254ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12259ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24305 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:51:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-21 19:51:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-21 19:51:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:51:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2024-05-21 19:51:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-21 19:51:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11940713512178794728.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:51:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12144417404069571339.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11940713512178794728.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12144417404069571339.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,20.5677,494924,2,197803,5,390581,6,0,452,700619,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG((((EF(((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(ROUTE_A>=1))||((NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(ROUTE_A>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_9>=1)&&(ROUTE_A>=1))||((NB_ATT...13104
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG((((E(TRUE U ((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(ROUTE_A>=1))||((NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(ROUTE_A>=1)))||(((...11471
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-21 19:51:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7086367223923915505.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7086367223923915505.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7086367223923915505.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7086367223923915505.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7086367223923915505.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:51:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:51:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:51:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 577 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2024-05-21 19:51:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 107 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:51:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1534310698390508789.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:51:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16778711457109430191.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1534310698390508789.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16778711457109430191.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.51349,41416,939,690,64104,12570,203,141084,113,78760,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG((((EF(((((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i0.u1.ROUTE_A>=1))||((i0.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(i0.u1.ROUTE_A>=1)))||(((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_...16998
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG((((E(TRUE U ((((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i0.u1.ROUTE_A>=1))||((i0.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(...19211
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t54, t97, t102, t147, t152, t220, t225, i0.u2.t10, i0.u2.t23, i2.t235, i2....267
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,23.8523,478344,1,0,792336,78465,1922,2.08549e+06,794,621677,568444
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:52:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:52:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:52:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 78 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4439 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 9490 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 14405ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14409ms
[2024-05-21 19:52:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:52:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:52:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:52:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:52:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:52:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:52:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-21 19:52:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:52:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:52:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:52:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4734 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 8041 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13027ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13030ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27600 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:52:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-21 19:52:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-21 19:52:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:52:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-21 19:52:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-21 19:52:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1019778747555450294.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:52:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16448348267908368956.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1019778747555450294.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16448348267908368956.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,17.2057,495532,2,197803,5,390581,6,0,452,700619,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AG(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_0>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_0...41812
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_1>=1)&&(C...44203
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
[2024-05-21 19:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2024-05-21 19:53:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8698316515029068030.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8698316515029068030.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8698316515029068030.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8698316515029068030.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8698316515029068030.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:53:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:53:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:53:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 577 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2024-05-21 19:53:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 113 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:53:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12181641889411879719.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:53:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13612003334052875858.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12181641889411879719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13612003334052875858.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.98038,69388,989,534,101853,12710,188,382421,115,101058,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AG(((((((((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)&&(i2.u3.COMPTEUR_0>=1)))||(((i1.u1.NB_AT...53548
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((i2.u5.CO...56868
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t54, t89, t94, t149, t154, t209, t215, i1.u2.t10, i1.u2.t23, i2.t235, i2.t...266
(forward)formula 0,0,3.63527,69388,1,0,101853,12710,2025,382421,780,101058,51245
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:53:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:53:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:53:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 81 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 3984 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 8368 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12694ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12699ms
[2024-05-21 19:53:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:53:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:53:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:53:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:53:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:53:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:53:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:53:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:53:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:53:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 76 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 5039 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7121 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12527ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12532ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25365 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2024-05-21 19:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-21 19:53:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-21 19:53:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-21 19:53:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11358319674705463432.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:53:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16412024875312177774.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11358319674705463432.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16412024875312177774.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,25.0772,495640,2,197803,5,390581,6,0,452,700619,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((AX((SUR_PONT_B<1)) + EF(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0<1)||(NB_ATTENTE_B_5<1))||((CONTROLEUR_0<1)||(COMPTEUR_6<1)))&&(((NB_ATTENTE_A_0<...20140
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((!(EX(!((SUR_PONT_B<1)))) + E(TRUE U ((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0<1)||(NB_ATTENT...53587
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6376290306910211200.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6376290306910211200.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6376290306910211200.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6376290306910211200.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6376290306910211200.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:54:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:54:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:54:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 577 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 99 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:54:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15304776779527435083.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13710070134884109760.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15304776779527435083.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13710070134884109760.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.18804,51988,1011,526,85044,7712,207,222433,115,64610,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((AX((i0.u1.SUR_PONT_B<1)) + EF(((((((((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0<1)||(i0.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_5<1))||((i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_0<1)||(i2.u4.COMPT...26068
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((!(EX(!((i0.u1.SUR_PONT_B<1)))) + E(TRUE U ((((((((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0<1)...73218
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t55, t100, t150, t240, t245, t250, t255, i0.u1.t10, i0.u1.t23, i2.t147, i2...268
(forward)formula 0,1,4.28315,51988,1,0,85044,11178,1655,226922,744,64610,104457
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:54:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:54:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:54:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 86 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 5296 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 8151 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13805ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13811ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:54:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:54:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [27]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 13876 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:54:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10224699973321601357.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9470263864681913845.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10224699973321601357.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9470263864681913845.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,20.1148,405068,2,119801,5,518455,6,0,448,703923,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(A((A((((CAPACITE>=10)&&(VIDANGE_1>=1))||((CAPACITE>=10)&&(VIDANGE_0>=1))) U ((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1))&&((C...10394
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!((E(!(EX((((((((CAPACITE>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1))&&((ATTENTE_A>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_0>=1)))||(((CAPA...30565
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
[2024-05-21 19:54:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:54:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5250110266711919381.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5250110266711919381.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5250110266711919381.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5250110266711919381.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5250110266711919381.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:54:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:54:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:54:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 513 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:54:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 67 ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 84 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:54:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4164000136758251985.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:54:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1864099071182240501.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4164000136758251985.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1864099071182240501.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.82102,44304,920,939,40842,16166,180,112319,146,261552,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(A((A((((i0.u0.CAPACITE>=10)&&(u4.VIDANGE_1>=1))||((i0.u0.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i2.u3.VIDANGE_0>=1))) U ((((((((((i0.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>=1)...13271
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!((E(!(EX((((((((i0.u0.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1))&&((i0.u1.ATTENTE_A>=1)&&(u4.CONTRO...39608
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t54, t58, t148, t216, t225, i0.u0.t10, i0.u0.t23, i2.t205, i2.t204, i2.t55...255
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:55:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:55:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:55:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4487 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7537 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12374ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12384ms
[2024-05-21 19:55:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:55:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:55:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [13]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 12441 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:55:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 19:55:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-21 19:55:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:55:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-21 19:55:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-21 19:55:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability283316263044321076.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:55:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3861846240709646702.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability283316263044321076.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3861846240709646702.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,16.7783,328300,2,121585,5,435998,6,0,448,533487,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((!(A((((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B...30069
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((((CAPACITE>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((ATTENTE_B>=1)&&(CONT...60042
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:56:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-21 19:56:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:56:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8303219328028765223.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8303219328028765223.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8303219328028765223.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8303219328028765223.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8303219328028765223.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:56:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:56:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:56:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 515 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:56:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2024-05-21 19:56:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 94 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:56:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10757446951574915782.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:56:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8590598057655659567.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10757446951574915782.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8590598057655659567.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,3.49324,72260,2103,1112,54580,18687,155,385914,148,288609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((!(A((((((((((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((i0.u0.CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(i0.u4.COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((i0.u0.NB_...37431
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((((i1.u1.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i1.u3.AT...78084
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t55, t132, t152, t203, t205, i0.t155, i0.t115, i0.t54, i1.u1.t10, i1.u1.t2...256
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 42 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:56:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:56:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:56:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 3677 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 10404 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 14482ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14488ms
[2024-05-21 19:56:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:56:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:56:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 186 ms returned [13, 27]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 189 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 14732 ms. Remains : 44/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:56:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 19:56:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-21 19:56:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:56:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 19:56:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 19:56:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15599638633426570476.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:56:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7638650577346841413.ctl : 13 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15599638633426570476.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7638650577346841413.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,23.4717,406448,2,55429,5,730037,6,0,444,742884,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-21 19:57:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14970392856585065683.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14970392856585065683.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14970392856585065683.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14970392856585065683.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14970392856585065683.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:57:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:57:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:57:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 333 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-21 19:57:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 77 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:57:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11811516255358384593.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 19:57:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2195152768410422037.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11811516255358384593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2195152768410422037.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 265/266 (removed 1) transitions.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:57:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 45 cols
[2024-05-21 19:57:54] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:57:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 3962 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 262/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 20049 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 24427ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24435ms
[2024-05-21 19:58:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:58:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:58:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 19:58:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:58:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:58:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 19:58:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:58:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:58:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:58:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 19:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 2/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 7220 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 262/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 6756 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 14385ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14388ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38958 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-21 19:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-21 19:58:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-21 19:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-21 19:58:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4235175777865679623.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 19:58:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14106949844589144027.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4235175777865679623.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14106949844589144027.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 19:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 19:59:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 19:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2986140367136528450.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2986140367136528450.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2986140367136528450.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2986140367136528450.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2986140367136528450.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 19:59:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 19:59:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 19:59:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 578 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2024-05-21 19:59:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 105 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2024-05-21 19:59:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3939323633848438646.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 19:59:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability118884815561729422.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3939323633848438646.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability118884815561729422.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,3.55977,106880,1161,695,159430,14277,197,630580,116,142076,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(AG((((((((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i0.u4.ATTENTE_B>=1)&&(i2.u3.CONTROLEUR_1>=1)))||(((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=1)&&(...27396
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(!(EX(!(EX(!((((((((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i1.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1))&&((i1.u1.ATTENTE_A>=1)&&(...54077
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t23, t53, t119, t124, t149, t154, t191, t194, i1.u2.t10, i2.t164, i2.t160, i2.t...257
(forward)formula 0,1,26.8557,535452,1,0,779050,74223,1623,3.24754e+06,777,606858,510458
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:59:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-21 19:59:30] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 19:59:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 19:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 19:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 2/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 4857 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 8282 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 13491ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13493ms
[2024-05-21 19:59:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 19:59:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 19:59:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [27]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 81 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 13578 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:59:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-21 19:59:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 19:59:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 19:59:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-21 19:59:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-21 19:59:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11363866660167053494.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 19:59:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8188873858130717410.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11363866660167053494.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8188873858130717410.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,22.589,404856,2,119801,5,518455,6,0,448,703923,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((EG((SUR_PONT_B>=1)) + !((((CAPACITE>=10)&&(VIDANGE_1>=1))||((CAPACITE>=10)&&(VIDANGE_0>=1))))) + (((EG((((((((CAPACITE>=1)&&(NB_ATTEN...12137
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((((((((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_2>=1))||((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_3>=1)))||(((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMP...12438
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 20:00:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-21 20:00:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 20:00:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15640935172542563196.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15640935172542563196.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15640935172542563196.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15640935172542563196.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15640935172542563196.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 20:00:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 20:00:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 20:00:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 515 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:00:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-21 20:00:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 94 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 20:00:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1759094195358143547.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 20:00:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13062204240423759449.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1759094195358143547.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13062204240423759449.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.8121,38468,873,935,32777,15954,151,92610,146,257596,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((EG((i0.u1.SUR_PONT_B>=1)) + !((((i0.u1.CAPACITE>=10)&&(u4.VIDANGE_1>=1))||((i0.u1.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i2.u3.VIDANGE_0>=1))))) + (((EG((((...15449
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((((((((i0.u1.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(i2.u2.COMPTEUR_2>=1))||((i0.u1.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(i2.u2.COMPTEUR_3>=1))...17422
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t54, t58, t148, t166, t175, i0.u1.t10, i0.u1.t23, i2.t245, i2.t244, i2.t55...255
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,28.4284,342480,1,0,270665,58024,1631,1.22531e+06,980,3.33375e+06,233312
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 43 transition count 264
Applied a total of 5 rules in 39 ms. Remains 43 /46 variables (removed 3) and now considering 264/266 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:00:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 43 cols
[2024-05-21 20:00:43] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 20:00:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned [12, 24]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 165 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/46 places, 264/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 264/264 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 217 ms. Remains : 41/46 places, 264/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:00:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 20:00:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 20:00:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 264 transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:00:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 20:00:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 20:00:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17574390809611018482.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 20:00:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1166996447355237229.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17574390809611018482.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1166996447355237229.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,69476,1.87354,59088,2,9950,5,122170,6,0,429,120758,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((((CHOIX_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((CHOIX_1>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_10>=1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t10, t11, t12, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56,...1396
(forward)formula 0,0,14.9194,336592,1,0,853,973957,540,259,3627,992982,646
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 265
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 265/266 (removed 1) transitions.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:00:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 45 cols
[2024-05-21 20:00:58] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 20:00:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 20:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 3697 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/130 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 262/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
[2024-05-21 20:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 10454 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 14587ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14593ms
[2024-05-21 20:01:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 20:01:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 20:01:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [13]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 265/265 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 14650 ms. Remains : 44/46 places, 265/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:01:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-21 20:01:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-21 20:01:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:01:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 20:01:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 20:01:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7284674240676165832.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 20:01:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13620180218761316043.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7284674240676165832.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13620180218761316043.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,24.2001,463448,2,133149,5,623344,6,0,443,816624,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(((EF(AX(((((((NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(ROUTE_B>=1))||((NB_ATTENTE_B_3>=1)&&(ROUTE_B>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_B_8>=1)&&(ROUTE_B>=1))||((NB_A...21077
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((((((NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(ROUTE_B>=1))||((NB_ATTENTE_B_3>=1)&&(ROU...40362
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
[2024-05-21 20:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2024-05-21 20:01:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 20:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4741333339220472829.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4741333339220472829.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4741333339220472829.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4741333339220472829.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4741333339220472829.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 20:01:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 20:01:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 20:01:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 515 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2024-05-21 20:01:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 86 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-21 20:01:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7437954741348244734.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 20:01:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9809703397026073057.ctl : 15 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7437954741348244734.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9809703397026073057.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.9517,46128,966,920,45982,16357,168,114425,143,259754,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(((EF(AX(((((((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i1.u3.ROUTE_B>=1))||((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_3>=1)&&(i1.u3.ROUTE_B>=1)))||(((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_...24854
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((((((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i1.u3.ROUTE_B>=1))||((i1.u3.NB_ATT...48205
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t23, t54, t112, t152, t190, t194, i1.u0.t10, i2.t154, i2.t114, i2.t53, Interse...245
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 266/266 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:02:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-21 20:02:13] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 20:02:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 20:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 80 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 20:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-21 20:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 2/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 20044 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7501 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 27990ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27997ms
[2024-05-21 20:02:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 20:02:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 20:02:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 20:02:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 20:02:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 20:02:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 20:02:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:02:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 180 similar events)
[2024-05-21 20:02:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 20:02:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
[2024-05-21 20:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 3961 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/132 variables, 46/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 263/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 7351 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 11607ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11610ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39719 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 266/266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-21 20:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-21 20:02:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-21 20:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-21 20:02:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7975141450732574195.gal : 14 ms
[2024-05-21 20:02:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16994176621534881580.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7975141450732574195.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16994176621534881580.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,22.6525,494828,2,197803,5,390581,6,0,452,700619,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((((((AG(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTE...22183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((((((!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(COMP...18776
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-21 20:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-21 20:03:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 20:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12373644061050023578.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12373644061050023578.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12373644061050023578.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12373644061050023578.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12373644061050023578.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 20:03:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 20:03:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 20:03:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 577 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2024-05-21 20:03:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 95 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 20:03:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8335898764419522292.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 20:03:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7923296867817597872.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8335898764419522292.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7923296867817597872.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,0.15624,9432,923,462,10238,3217,164,13469,110,14474,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((((((AG(((((((((((i1.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((i1.u1.CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(i1.u4.COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((i1.u1.N...27304
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((((((!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((i1.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((i1.u1.CONTROLE...27391
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t55, t60, t150, t166, t175, t226, t235, i0.u0.t10, i0.u0.t23, i1.t154, i1....267
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,6.47886,157800,1,0,297552,43604,2543,350446,852,295430,469303
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-21 20:03:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-21 20:03:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-21 20:03:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-21 20:03:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13594650993864220962.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13594650993864220962.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13594650993864220962.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13594650993864220962.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13594650993864220962.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-21 20:03:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-21 20:03:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-21 20:03:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 577 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-21 20:03:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2024-05-21 20:03:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 113 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-21 20:03:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10399720045114000990.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 20:03:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability224989100643597156.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10399720045114000990.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability224989100643597156.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.37745,62256,997,513,92049,13453,185,322151,115,92621,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((AF((EG(((((((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_9<1)||(i1.u3.ROUTE_B<1))&&((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_3<1)||(i1.u3.ROUTE_B<1)))&&(((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_8<1)...16042
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!((EG(((((((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_9<1)||(i1.u3.ROUTE_B<1))&&((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_3<1)||(i1.u3.ROU...16327
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t55, t122, t152, t222, t225, t252, t255, i1.u2.t10, i1.u2.t23, i2.t153, i2...267
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,49.3313,722176,1,0,864448,165371,1345,4.45432e+06,810,1.53327e+06,614518
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EG(EF(!(E(AX((i1.u2.SUR_PONT_B>=1)) U !((((i2.u4.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(i2.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i0.u5.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i2.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1)))))))...3255
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * EG(E(TRUE U !(E(!(EX(!((i1.u2.SUR_PONT_B>=1)))) U !((((i2.u4.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(i2.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1))|...3340
(forward)formula 1,0,54.6017,764416,1,0,933886,169444,1719,4.63934e+06,853,1.5559e+06,700835
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EX((AF(EG(AX((((i2.u4.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(i2.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i0.u5.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i2.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1)))))) * AF(EX(((E((((((((i1.u2.CAP...13878
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!(EX(!((((i2.u4.CHOIX_0>=1)&&(i2.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i0.u5.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i2.u0.COMPTE...13941
(forward)formula 2,0,83.3469,1035016,1,0,1.21251e+06,209823,2215,6.40399e+06,883,1.87536e+06,875724
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG(EX(A((A((((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i2.u4.VIDANGE_1>=1))||((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i0.u5.VIDANGE_0>=1))) U ((((((((((i0.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_8>...13304
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!((E(!(EX((((((((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_7>=1))&&((i0.u1.ATTENTE_A>=1)&&(i2.u4.CON...39701
dead was empty
(forward)formula 3,0,95.4765,1125424,1,0,1.32105e+06,220972,2252,6.76385e+06,883,1.97213e+06,955485
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(((!(A((((((((((((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_5>=1))&&((i2.u4.CONTROLEUR_0>=1)&&(i2.u0.COMPTEUR_6>=1)))||(((i2.u4.NB_...38481
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1))&&((i1.u3.AT...80274
(forward)formula 4,1,99.874,1191424,1,0,1.41935e+06,222742,2992,7.07904e+06,900,1.99048e+06,1057901
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AG((((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i2.u4.VIDANGE_1>=1))||((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i0.u5.VIDANGE_0>=1)))) + AF((i1.u2.SUR_PONT_A>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !((((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i2.u4.VIDANGE_1>=1))||((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=10)&&(i0.u5.VIDANG...204
(forward)formula 5,1,100.142,1194064,1,0,1.42361e+06,223215,3005,7.08544e+06,900,1.99345e+06,1066170
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(AX(((EF(AX(((((((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i1.u3.ROUTE_B>=1))||((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_3>=1)&&(i1.u3.ROUTE_B>=1)))||(((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_...26993
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((((((i2.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i1.u3.ROUTE_B>=1))||((i1.u3.NB_ATT...52450
(forward)formula 6,1,112.247,1293856,1,0,1.55693e+06,239328,3193,7.57616e+06,902,2.10964e+06,1172014
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Total runtime 1175578 ms.

BK_STOP 1716321923503

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r048-tajo-171620398600010"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10.tgz
mv BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V10P10N10 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;