About the Execution of ITS-Tools for BART-COL-050
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
5362.460 | 3600000.00 | 6622503.00 | 6564.00 | FF?FFFTFFFFFFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r026-smll-171620167700428.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is BART-COL-050, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r026-smll-171620167700428
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 764K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K Apr 13 01:28 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K Apr 13 01:28 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Apr 12 22:06 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K Apr 12 22:06 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 13 08:03 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 162K Apr 13 08:03 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 13 03:53 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 13 03:53 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 213K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716377727075
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BART-COL-050
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
LTLFireability COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-22 11:35:28] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-22 11:35:28] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-22 11:35:29] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-22 11:35:30] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-22 11:35:31] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1837 ms
[2024-05-22 11:35:31] [INFO ] Detected 3 constant HL places corresponding to 10373 PT places.
[2024-05-22 11:35:31] [INFO ] Imported 4 HL places and 7 HL transitions for a total of 22673 PT places and 7.03614756E10 transition bindings in 218 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 23 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2024-05-22 11:35:31] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 4 places and 7 transitions 26 arcs in 10 ms.
[2024-05-22 11:35:31] [INFO ] Skeletonized 2 HLPN properties in 3 ms. Removed 14 properties that had guard overlaps.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
All 16 properties of the HLPN use transition enablings in a way that makes the skeleton too coarse.
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :trainid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial detected :trainid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards detected :trainid
Applying symmetric unfolding of full symmetric sort :trainid domain size was 50
Domain [distance(41), speed(6), distance(41)] of place NewDistTable breaks symmetries in sort distance
Arc [0:1*[$db, (MOD (ADD $tsp 1) 6), $da2]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort speed
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 10619 places and 323 transitions 601 arcs in 2221 ms.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 10215 places in 4 ms
Reduce places removed 10487 places and 121 transitions.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 132 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 11:35:33] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 30 ms
[2024-05-22 11:35:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 310 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:35:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:35:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 190 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 550 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5227 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 4373 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9696ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9721ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10314 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Support contains 132 out of 132 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2024-05-22 11:35:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-22 11:35:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 8 to 6
RANDOM walk for 2299 steps (0 resets) in 15 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G((X(p0)||(p0 U p1))) U (X(p0) U G(p0))))'
Support contains 130 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:35:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:35:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:35:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5899 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 4194 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10139ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10144ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10311 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 381 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1267 steps with 2 reset in 26 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-00 finished in 10805 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)||X(F((X(X(!p0))&&F(p1)))))))'
Support contains 69 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 132 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 129 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 103 transition count 173
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 102 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 102 transition count 172
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 98 transition count 168
Applied a total of 68 rules in 42 ms. Remains 98 /132 variables (removed 34) and now considering 168/202 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-22 11:35:55] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-22 11:35:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:35:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:35:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 213 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 11:35:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:35:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 3560 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 132/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 3339 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6923ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6926ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7195 ms. Remains : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 656 reset in 826 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 648 reset in 522 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 183 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 1534 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (219 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 370 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 108 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 94 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 69 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 168/168 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 168/168 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:36:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:36:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:36:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:36:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 126 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 187 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 11:36:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:36:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 4032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 132/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 2919 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6980ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6985ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7201 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 168/168 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 201 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 1534 steps (0 resets) in 9 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 411 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 105 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 89 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 637 reset in 468 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 641 reset in 440 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin5142223907215956141
[2024-05-22 11:36:14] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 168 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:36:14] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 7 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 11:36:14] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 168 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:36:14] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 11:36:14] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 168 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:36:14] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 11:36:14] [INFO ] Built C files in 66ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin5142223907215956141
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5142223907215956141;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1170 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5142223907215956141;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 78 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin5142223907215956141;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased11563138350896746308.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 69 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 168/168 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 168/168 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:36:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:36:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:36:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:36:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 11:36:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:36:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 3350 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 132/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 2513 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5892ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5895ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6051 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 168/168 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin7421296064741387613
[2024-05-22 11:36:35] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 168 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:36:35] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 11:36:35] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 168 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:36:35] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 11:36:35] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 168 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:36:35] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 11:36:35] [INFO ] Built C files in 40ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin7421296064741387613
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7421296064741387613;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 802 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7421296064741387613;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 35 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin7421296064741387613;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased17040853234624683898.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-22 11:36:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 11:36:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 11:36:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL5172477724154493020.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 11:36:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL17018593031448917367.prop : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL5172477724154493020.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut12391925001898726952.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL17018593031448917367.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...319
Loading property file /tmp/LTL17018593031448917367.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut12391925001898726952.hoa
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 11:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 11:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 11:37:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL7441407022035801138.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 11:37:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL13952439325793390087.ltl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL7441407022035801138.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL13952439325793390087.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G((F("((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_191<1))&&((TrainState_63<1)&&(TrainState_189<1)))&&(((TrainState_65<1)&&(TrainState_195...3049
Formula 0 simplified : F(G!"((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_191<1))&&((TrainState_63<1)&&(TrainState_189<1)))&&(((TrainState_65<1)&&(TrainState_195<1...3033
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 11:37:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 11:37:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 11:37:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12546966470133883997.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12546966470133883997.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12546966470133883997.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12546966470133883997.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12546966470133883997.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 11:37:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 11:37:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 11:37:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:37:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2024-05-22 11:37:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2024-05-22 11:37:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14400435746304801928.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 11:37:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL11318113248265682085.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL14400435746304801928.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL11318113248265682085.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...256
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G((F("((((((((i3.i0.u3.TrainState_61<1)&&(i2.u35.TrainState_191<1))&&((i3.i1.u4.TrainState_63<1)&&(i7.i1.u21.TrainState_189<1)))&&(...4200
Formula 0 simplified : F(G!"((((((((i3.i0.u3.TrainState_61<1)&&(i2.u35.TrainState_191<1))&&((i3.i1.u4.TrainState_63<1)&&(i7.i1.u21.TrainState_189<1)))&&(((...4184
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-02 finished in 100582 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0||F(G(!p1))))))'
Support contains 97 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 11:37:36] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-22 11:37:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:37:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:37:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:37:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5125 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 4717 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9861ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9863ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10038 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 207 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 198 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 5799 steps with 0 reset with depth 5800 and stack size 5800 in 14 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-03 finished in 10497 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((!p0||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 89 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 132 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 130 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 121 transition count 191
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 121 transition count 187
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 117 transition count 187
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 111 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 111 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 111 transition count 180
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 108 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 108 transition count 177
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 105 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 105 transition count 174
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 102 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 102 transition count 171
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 100 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 100 transition count 169
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 98 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 98 transition count 167
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 97 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 97 transition count 166
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 91 transition count 160
Applied a total of 83 rules in 44 ms. Remains 91 /132 variables (removed 41) and now considering 160/202 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 91 cols
[2024-05-22 11:37:46] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 11:37:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:37:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:37:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 11:37:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:37:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/251 variables, 91/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 251/251 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 3385 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/251 variables, 91/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 124/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 251/251 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 2683 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6088ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6091ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6266 ms. Remains : 91/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 85 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 271 reset in 822 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 530 steps with 3 reset with depth 266 and stack size 266 in 4 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-04 finished in 7200 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(!p0)&&X(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 97 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 26 edges and 132 vertex of which 6 / 132 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 127 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 119 transition count 189
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 107 transition count 177
Applied a total of 41 rules in 19 ms. Remains 107 /132 variables (removed 25) and now considering 177/202 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 177 rows 107 cols
[2024-05-22 11:37:54] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 11:37:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:37:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:37:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 110 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 11:37:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:37:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 176/283 variables, 107/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/283 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 283/284 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3332 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 176/283 variables, 107/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 141/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/283 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 283/284 variables, and 249 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 2895 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6255ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6260ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/132 places, 177/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6444 ms. Remains : 107/132 places, 177/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 163 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p0), p0, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-07
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-07 finished in 6683 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&X(G((G(p2)||p1))))))'
Support contains 10 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 109 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 109 transition count 179
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 90 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 90 transition count 160
Applied a total of 84 rules in 21 ms. Remains 90 /132 variables (removed 42) and now considering 160/202 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 90 cols
[2024-05-22 11:38:00] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 11:38:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:38:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:38:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/250 variables, 90/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 250/250 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 3802 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/250 variables, 90/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 124/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 250/250 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 2040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5868ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5871ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6049 ms. Remains : 90/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 188 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-10 finished in 6261 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(G(!p0)))&&(G(!p0)||(p0 U !p1))))'
Support contains 69 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 129 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 129 transition count 199
Applied a total of 6 rules in 11 ms. Remains 129 /132 variables (removed 3) and now considering 199/202 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 129 cols
[2024-05-22 11:38:06] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 11:38:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:38:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:38:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 163 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 199/328 variables, 129/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 328/328 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 6128 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 199/328 variables, 129/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 163/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 328/328 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 4796 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10956ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10960ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/132 places, 199/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11149 ms. Remains : 129/132 places, 199/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 207 ms :[p0, p0, p0, p1, true]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-11
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 10 steps with 4 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-11 finished in 11376 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0&&(p0 U (p1||G(p0)))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 132 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 68 transition count 138
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 68 transition count 134
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 64 transition count 134
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 58 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 58 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 58 transition count 127
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 54 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 54 transition count 123
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 51 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 51 transition count 120
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 48 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 48 transition count 117
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 46 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 46 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 44 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 44 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 43 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 43 transition count 112
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 36 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 36 transition count 101
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 34 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 34 transition count 95
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 32 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 32 transition count 89
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 30 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 30 transition count 83
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 28 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 28 transition count 77
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 26 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 26 transition count 71
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 24 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 24 transition count 65
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 22 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 10 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 22 transition count 59
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 11 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 20 transition count 57
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 11 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 20 transition count 53
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 12 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 18 transition count 51
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 12 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 18 transition count 47
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 13 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 16 transition count 45
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 13 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 16 transition count 41
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 14 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 14 transition count 39
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 14 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 14 transition count 35
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 15 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 12 transition count 33
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 15 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 12 transition count 29
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 16 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 10 transition count 27
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 16 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 10 transition count 23
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 17 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 8 transition count 21
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 17 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 8 transition count 17
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 18 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 6 transition count 15
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 18 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 6 transition count 11
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 19 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 4 transition count 9
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 19 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 4 transition count 4
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 20 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 3 transition count 3
Applied a total of 328 rules in 61 ms. Remains 3 /132 variables (removed 129) and now considering 3/202 (removed 199) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 3 cols
[2024-05-22 11:38:18] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 11:38:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:38:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:38:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 11:38:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 2 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/6 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 6/6 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 41 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/6 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 6/6 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 41 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 86ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 86ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 3/132 places, 3/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 215 ms. Remains : 3/132 places, 3/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 175 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 48 reset in 67 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 61 reset in 71 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 272 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 179 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 208 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (34 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 341 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 156 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 2 out of 3 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 3/3 places, 3/3 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 3 /3 variables (removed 0) and now considering 3/3 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:38:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:38:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:38:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 20 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 41 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 11:38:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 2 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/6 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 6/6 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 35 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/6 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 6/6 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 35 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 81ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 82ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 130 ms. Remains : 3/3 places, 3/3 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 259 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 146 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 208 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 346 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 132 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 143 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 139 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 49 reset in 84 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 71 reset in 79 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin15478734664221170816
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 3 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 3 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 3 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Built C files in 4ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin15478734664221170816
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15478734664221170816;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 113 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15478734664221170816;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 47 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin15478734664221170816;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased12884476945022797266.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 189 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-12 finished in 3577 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 100 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 100 transition count 170
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 73 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 73 transition count 143
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 69 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 69 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 66 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 66 transition count 136
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 63 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 63 transition count 133
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 60 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 60 transition count 130
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 57 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 57 transition count 127
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 54 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 54 transition count 124
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 52 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 52 transition count 122
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 50 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 50 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 49 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 49 transition count 119
Applied a total of 166 rules in 16 ms. Remains 49 /132 variables (removed 83) and now considering 119/202 (removed 83) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 49 cols
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 119/168 variables, 49/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 1331 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 119/168 variables, 49/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 83/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 1463 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2807ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2808ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/132 places, 119/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2916 ms. Remains : 49/132 places, 119/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 106 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-13
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 88 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-13 finished in 3041 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((G(F(p0))||(!p1&&F(p0))))))'
Support contains 68 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 132 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 129 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 103 transition count 173
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 102 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 102 transition count 172
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 98 transition count 168
Applied a total of 68 rules in 9 ms. Remains 98 /132 variables (removed 34) and now considering 168/202 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-22 11:38:24] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 11:38:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 11:38:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 11:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 11:38:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 3913 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 132/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 3376 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7315ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7317ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7504 ms. Remains : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5 reset in 381 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 7465 steps with 0 reset with depth 7466 and stack size 7466 in 45 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-15 finished in 8068 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)||X(F((X(X(!p0))&&F(p1)))))))'
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
Using solver Z3 to compute partial order matrices.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin9900068340012093362
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 5 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15211894030971466129.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15211894030971466129.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15211894030971466129.weights'
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Built C files in 71ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin9900068340012093362
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9900068340012093362;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '720' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15211894030971466129.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15211894030971466129.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 17 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability6903583462540511304.gal : 22 ms
[2024-05-22 11:38:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability481663650389771037.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability6903583462540511304.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability481663650389771037.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...275
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G((F("((((((((i0.u2.TrainState_61<1)&&(i7.i0.u37.TrainState_191<1))&&((i4.i0.u16.TrainState_63<1)&&(i10.i0.u48.TrainState_189<1)))&...4169
Formula 0 simplified : F(G!"((((((((i0.u2.TrainState_61<1)&&(i7.i0.u37.TrainState_191<1))&&((i4.i0.u16.TrainState_63<1)&&(i10.i0.u48.TrainState_189<1)))&&(...4149
Compilation finished in 815 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9900068340012093362;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin9900068340012093362;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '[]((<>((LTLAPp0==true))||X(<>((X(X(!(LTLAPp0==true)))&&<>((LTLAPp1==true)))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
pins2lts-mc-linux64, 0.000: Registering PINS so language module
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.002: Loading model from ./gal.so
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.002: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.002: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.006: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.006: LTL layer: formula: []((<>((LTLAPp0==true))||X(<>((X(X(!(LTLAPp0==true)))&&<>((LTLAPp1==true)))))))
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.006: "[]((<>((LTLAPp0==true))||X(<>((X(X(!(LTLAPp0==true)))&&<>((LTLAPp1==true)))))))" is not a file, parsing as formula...
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.007: Using Spin LTL semantics
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 0.016: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 0.016: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 0.019: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 3/ 8), 0.018: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 3/ 8), 0.018: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 3/ 8), 0.021: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 5/ 8), 0.021: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 5/ 8), 0.021: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 4/ 8), 0.020: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 4/ 8), 0.020: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 5/ 8), 0.024: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 0.024: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 0.024: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 4/ 8), 0.024: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 0.024: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 0.024: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 6/ 8), 0.025: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 6/ 8), 0.025: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 0.027: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 0.032: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 6/ 8), 0.032: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.038: buchi has 2 states
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.066: Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.121: DFS-FIFO for weak LTL, using special progress label 205
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.121: There are 206 state labels and 1 edge labels
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.121: State length is 133, there are 205 groups
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.121: Running dfsfifo using 8 cores
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.121: Using a tree table with 2^27 elements
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.121: Successor permutation: rr
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.121: Global bits: 2, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 3.368: ~119 levels ~960 states ~60824 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 3.916: ~236 levels ~1920 states ~96616 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 4.153: ~426 levels ~3840 states ~117760 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 4.195: ~467 levels ~7680 states ~132496 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 4.290: ~467 levels ~15360 states ~149184 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 4.459: ~467 levels ~30720 states ~187056 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 4.826: ~467 levels ~61440 states ~271992 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 5.536: ~467 levels ~122880 states ~438520 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 8.484: ~464 levels ~245760 states ~782240 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 3/ 8), 11.801: ~468 levels ~491520 states ~1634704 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 15.316: ~464 levels ~983040 states ~3022856 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 20.711: ~464 levels ~1966080 states ~6295688 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 30.771: ~464 levels ~3932160 states ~12837024 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 51.924: ~464 levels ~7864320 states ~26964608 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 95.542: ~464 levels ~15728640 states ~57131144 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 183.455: ~464 levels ~31457280 states ~119211696 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 360.889: ~464 levels ~62914560 states ~243987712 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 728.891: ~464 levels ~125829120 states ~508665456 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 5/ 8), 951.315: Error: tree roots table full! Change -s/--ratio.
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403:
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: mean standard work distribution: 37.8% (states) 37.8% (transitions)
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403:
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: Explored 134109638 states 552115915 transitions, fanout: 4.117
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: Total exploration time 951.250 sec (951.170 sec minimum, 951.201 sec on average)
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: States per second: 140983, Transitions per second: 580411
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403:
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: Progress states detected: 253
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: Redundant explorations: -0.0803
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403:
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: Queue width: 8B, total height: 3529, memory: 0.03MB
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: Tree memory: 1031.2MB, 8.1 B/state, compr.: 1.5%
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 99.0%/2.0%
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: Stored 202 string chucks using 0MB
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 951.403: Est. total memory use: 1031.2MB (~1024.0MB paged-in)
WARNING : LTS min runner thread failed on error :java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected exception when executing ltsmin :cd /tmp/ltsmin9900068340012093362;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '[]((<>((LTLAPp0==true))||X(<>((X(X(!(LTLAPp0==true)))&&<>((LTLAPp1==true)))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
255
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected exception when executing ltsmin :cd /tmp/ltsmin9900068340012093362;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '[]((<>((LTLAPp0==true))||X(<>((X(X(!(LTLAPp0==true)))&&<>((LTLAPp1==true)))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
255
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.ltsmin.LTSminRunner.checkProperty(LTSminRunner.java:241)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.ltsmin.LTSminRunner$1.checkProperties(LTSminRunner.java:176)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.ltsmin.LTSminRunner$1.run(LTSminRunner.java:114)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 11:59:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 11:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 11:59:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 11:59:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 11:59:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 140 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 11:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2024-05-22 11:59:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-22 11:59:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability14982255208278950221.gal : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 11:59:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability11543914254025507017.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability14982255208278950221.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability11543914254025507017.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...278
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G((F("((((((((trainidspeeddistance61.TrainState_61<1)&&(trainidspeeddistance191.TrainState_191<1))&&((trainidspeeddistance63.TrainS...6185
Formula 0 simplified : F(G!"((((((((trainidspeeddistance61.TrainState_61<1)&&(trainidspeeddistance191.TrainState_191<1))&&((trainidspeeddistance63.TrainSta...6165
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 12:20:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 12:20:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 12:20:36] [INFO ] Transformed 132 places.
[2024-05-22 12:20:36] [INFO ] Transformed 202 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2024-05-22 12:20:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability2882481915107410844.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 12:20:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability1663062025541111935.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability2882481915107410844.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability1663062025541111935.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ltl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...342
Read 1 LTL properties
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
Checking formula 0 : !((G((F("((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_191<1))&&((TrainState_63<1)&&(TrainState_189<1)))&&(((TrainState_65<1)&&(TrainState_195...2984
Formula 0 simplified : F(G!"((((((((TrainState_61<1)&&(TrainState_191<1))&&((TrainState_63<1)&&(TrainState_189<1)))&&(((TrainState_65<1)&&(TrainState_195<1...2964
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BART-COL-050"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BART-COL-050, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r026-smll-171620167700428"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BART-COL-050.tgz
mv BART-COL-050 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;