fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r026-smll-171620167600388
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for BART-COL-005

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
1804.380 274261.00 424543.00 1005.70 FFFTFTFFFTFFFFFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r026-smll-171620167600388.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is BART-COL-005, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r026-smll-171620167600388
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 624K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K Apr 12 21:36 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K Apr 12 21:36 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K Apr 12 21:25 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Apr 12 21:25 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.4K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 12 22:11 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K Apr 12 22:11 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K Apr 12 21:48 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K Apr 12 21:48 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 186K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716366700523

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BART-COL-005
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
LTLFireability COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-22 08:31:42] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-22 08:31:43] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-22 08:31:43] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-22 08:31:44] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-22 08:31:44] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1447 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:44] [INFO ] Detected 3 constant HL places corresponding to 10373 PT places.
[2024-05-22 08:31:44] [INFO ] Imported 4 HL places and 7 HL transitions for a total of 11603 PT places and 7.03614756E9 transition bindings in 88 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2024-05-22 08:31:45] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 4 places and 7 transitions 26 arcs in 8 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:31:45] [INFO ] Skeletonized 2 HLPN properties in 2 ms. Removed 14 properties that had guard overlaps.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
All 16 properties of the HLPN use transition enablings in a way that makes the skeleton too coarse.
Domain [distance(41), speed(6), distance(41)] of place NewDistTable breaks symmetries in sort distance
Arc [0:1*[$db, (MOD (ADD $tsp 1) 6), $da2]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort speed
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :trainid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial detected :trainid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards detected :trainid
Applying symmetric unfolding of full symmetric sort :trainid domain size was 5
[2024-05-22 08:31:45] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 10619 places and 323 transitions 601 arcs in 692 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:31:45] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 11 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
[2024-05-22 08:31:45] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:45] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:45] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:45] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:45] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:45] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 10215 places in 5 ms
Reduce places removed 10487 places and 121 transitions.
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 132 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 34 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 310 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:31:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 232 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 613 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 7375 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5432 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12940ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12983ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13646 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Support contains 132 out of 132 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 10 to 7
RANDOM walk for 7156 steps (0 resets) in 133 ms. (53 steps per ms) remains 0/7 properties
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((!p0 U (p1&&F(p2)))))'
Support contains 130 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:32:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6533 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5329 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11914ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11917ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12061 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 440 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 49263 reset in 664 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 49267 reset in 514 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 776 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
RANDOM walk for 4 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (0 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 746 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 172 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
[2024-05-22 08:32:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:32:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 238 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:32:17] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Proved EG (NOT p2)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p2), (G (NOT p2))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(G (NOT p2))
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 753 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-01 finished in 17491 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)||X(X(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 89 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 123 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 123 transition count 193
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 117 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 117 transition count 187
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 114 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 114 transition count 184
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 111 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 111 transition count 181
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 108 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 108 transition count 178
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 105 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 105 transition count 175
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 103 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 103 transition count 173
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 101 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 101 transition count 171
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 100 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 100 transition count 170
Applied a total of 64 rules in 36 ms. Remains 100 /132 variables (removed 32) and now considering 170/202 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 100 cols
[2024-05-22 08:32:18] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:32:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 220 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 134 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 170/270 variables, 100/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/270 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 270/270 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 4723 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 170/270 variables, 100/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 134/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/270 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 270/270 variables, and 235 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 3732 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8499ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8506ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/132 places, 170/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8765 ms. Remains : 100/132 places, 170/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 201 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 49281 reset in 573 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 49263 reset in 568 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 300 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 201 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 108 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 439 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 202 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 201 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 89 out of 100 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 170/170 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 170/170 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:32:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 134 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 170/270 variables, 100/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/270 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 270/270 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 4579 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 170/270 variables, 100/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 134/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/270 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 270/270 variables, and 235 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 3803 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8416ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8419ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8617 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 170/170 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 333 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 198 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 84 steps (0 resets) in 8 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 433 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 205 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 194 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 197 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 49297 reset in 310 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 49284 reset in 269 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, true, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 143 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 89 out of 100 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 170/170 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 100 transition count 170
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 100 transition count 170
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 100 transition count 170
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 98 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 98 transition count 168
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 98 transition count 168
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 98 transition count 167
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 92 transition count 161
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 92 transition count 161
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 27 rules in 28 ms. Remains 92 /100 variables (removed 8) and now considering 161/170 (removed 9) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 125 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 92 cols
[2024-05-22 08:32:40] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 4 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 161/253 variables, 92/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/253 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 253/253 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved in 3489 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/92 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 161/253 variables, 92/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 123/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/253 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 253/253 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved in 2788 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/125 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6300ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 6302ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/100 places, 159/170 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 159 edges and 92 vertex of which 90 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 14 ms. Remains 90 /92 variables (removed 2) and now considering 159/159 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/100 places, 159/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 6363 ms. Remains : 90/100 places, 159/170 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin13894149378515708222
[2024-05-22 08:32:47] [INFO ] Built C files in 26ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin13894149378515708222
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13894149378515708222;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1065 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13894149378515708222;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 72 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin13894149378515708222;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9809160243032112732.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 511 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-02 finished in 30859 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 68 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 129 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 129 transition count 199
Applied a total of 6 rules in 10 ms. Remains 129 /132 variables (removed 3) and now considering 199/202 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 129 cols
[2024-05-22 08:32:49] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:32:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 169 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 231 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 163 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 199/328 variables, 129/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 328/328 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 6740 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 199/328 variables, 129/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 163/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 328/328 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 5187 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11959ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11963ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/132 places, 199/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12205 ms. Remains : 129/132 places, 199/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 117 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 294 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 284 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 13 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-03 finished in 12940 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 69 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 132 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 129 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 103 transition count 173
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 102 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 102 transition count 172
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 98 transition count 168
Applied a total of 68 rules in 19 ms. Remains 98 /132 variables (removed 34) and now considering 168/202 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-22 08:33:02] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:33:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:33:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 08:33:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 4698 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 132/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 3669 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8382ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8384ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8575 ms. Remains : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 58 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 833 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 192 steps with 0 reset with depth 193 and stack size 193 in 3 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-04 finished in 9490 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F((X(X(!p1))||p0)))))'
Support contains 79 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 205 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6844 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5257 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12120ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12122ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12331 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 255 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 216 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 297 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-05 finished in 13151 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(G((p0 U p1))) U (G(p2)||F(G(p0)))))'
Support contains 98 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:33:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:33:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:33:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6976 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5410 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12414ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12418ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12633 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 303 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 383 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 819 steps with 0 reset with depth 820 and stack size 818 in 3 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-06 finished in 13359 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(!p0)))'
Support contains 88 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 44 edges and 132 vertex of which 6 / 132 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 127 transition count 196
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 126 transition count 187
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 117 transition count 187
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 117 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 115 transition count 185
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 110 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 110 transition count 180
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 107 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 107 transition count 177
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 104 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 104 transition count 174
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 101 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 101 transition count 171
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 99 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 99 transition count 169
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 97 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 97 transition count 167
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 96 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 96 transition count 166
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 89 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 89 transition count 158
Applied a total of 78 rules in 39 ms. Remains 89 /132 variables (removed 43) and now considering 158/202 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-22 08:33:38] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:33:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:33:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 08:33:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 122 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 157/246 variables, 89/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/247 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 3245 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 157/246 variables, 89/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 122/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/247 variables, and 212 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 2694 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5959ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5962ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/132 places, 158/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6134 ms. Remains : 89/132 places, 158/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 48 ms :[p0]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-08 finished in 6197 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((!p0||X((G(p1) U (!p2&&G(p1)))))))'
Support contains 10 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 109 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 109 transition count 179
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 90 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 90 transition count 160
Applied a total of 84 rules in 13 ms. Remains 90 /132 variables (removed 42) and now considering 160/202 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 90 cols
[2024-05-22 08:33:44] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:33:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:33:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/250 variables, 90/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 250/250 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 3700 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/250 variables, 90/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 124/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 250/250 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 2933 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6656ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6659ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6809 ms. Remains : 90/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 263 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1)) (AND p0 p2)), true, (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1)) (AND p0 p2)), (OR (NOT p1) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 187 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 218 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND p2 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 19 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-09 finished in 7526 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(!p0)))'
Support contains 9 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 178 edges and 132 vertex of which 41 / 132 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 40 places
Ensure Unique test removed 75 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 75 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 56 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 56 transitions
Performed 56 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 56
Iterating post reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 92 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 36 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 32 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 28 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 24 transition count 39
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 19 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 19 transition count 34
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 19 transition count 29
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 19 transition count 28
Applied a total of 173 rules in 20 ms. Remains 19 /132 variables (removed 113) and now considering 28/202 (removed 174) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 19 cols
[2024-05-22 08:33:51] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:33:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:33:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 08:33:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 18 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 27/46 variables, 19/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/47 variables, and 20 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved in 283 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 27/46 variables, 19/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 18/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/47 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved in 224 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 513ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 514ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/132 places, 28/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 638 ms. Remains : 19/132 places, 28/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 44 ms :[p0]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 12 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-10 finished in 701 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)||X(G(p1))))'
Support contains 77 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:33:52] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:33:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:33:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 192 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6869 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5238 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12129ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12132ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12326 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 164 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5487 reset in 612 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5556 reset in 368 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 381 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 143 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 112 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 535 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 145 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 146 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
[2024-05-22 08:34:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:34:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 243 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:34:07] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 08:34:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:34:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 153 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:34:08] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 166/270/166 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 41 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:34:09] [INFO ] Added : 166 causal constraints over 34 iterations in 945 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Support contains 77 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:34:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6978 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 4282 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11292ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11295ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11514 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 387 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 130 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 519 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 145 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
[2024-05-22 08:34:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:34:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 244 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:34:22] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 08:34:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:34:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 153 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:34:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 166/270/166 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 22 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:34:24] [INFO ] Added : 166 causal constraints over 34 iterations in 873 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 139 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5556 reset in 588 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5523 reset in 367 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 114 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 77 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Performed 24 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 132 transition count 202
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 24 rules in 8 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
[2024-05-22 08:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 139 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved in 7708 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 25/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 142/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved in 5841 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/166 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13571ms problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 13575ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/132 places, 178/202 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 178 edges and 132 vertex of which 108 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 24 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 24 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 6 ms. Remains 108 /132 variables (removed 24) and now considering 178/178 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 108/132 places, 178/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 13601 ms. Remains : 108/132 places, 178/202 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin18298555829764847309
[2024-05-22 08:34:39] [INFO ] Built C files in 6ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin18298555829764847309
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin18298555829764847309;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 572 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin18298555829764847309;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 30 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin18298555829764847309;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1911882044487333951.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 296 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-11 finished in 47705 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(!p0)))'
Support contains 68 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 129 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 129 transition count 199
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 129 /132 variables (removed 3) and now considering 199/202 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 129 cols
[2024-05-22 08:34:40] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:34:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 163 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 199/328 variables, 129/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 328/328 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 5868 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 199/328 variables, 129/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 163/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 328/328 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 3937 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9824ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9826ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/132 places, 199/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9978 ms. Remains : 129/132 places, 199/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 80 ms :[true, p0, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-12
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-12 finished in 10073 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 132 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 68 transition count 138
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 68 transition count 134
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 64 transition count 134
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 58 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 58 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 58 transition count 127
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 54 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 54 transition count 123
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 51 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 51 transition count 120
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 48 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 48 transition count 117
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 46 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 46 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 44 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 44 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 43 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 43 transition count 112
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 36 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 36 transition count 101
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 34 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 34 transition count 95
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 32 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 32 transition count 89
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 30 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 30 transition count 83
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 28 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 28 transition count 77
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 26 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 26 transition count 71
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 24 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 24 transition count 65
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 22 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 10 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 22 transition count 59
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 11 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 20 transition count 57
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 11 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 20 transition count 53
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 12 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 18 transition count 51
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 12 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 18 transition count 47
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 13 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 16 transition count 45
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 13 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 16 transition count 41
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 14 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 14 transition count 39
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 14 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 14 transition count 35
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 15 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 12 transition count 33
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 15 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 12 transition count 29
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 16 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 10 transition count 27
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 16 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 10 transition count 23
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 17 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 8 transition count 21
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 17 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 8 transition count 17
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 18 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 6 transition count 15
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 18 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 6 transition count 11
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 19 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 4 transition count 9
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 19 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 4 transition count 4
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 20 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 3 transition count 3
Applied a total of 328 rules in 53 ms. Remains 3 /132 variables (removed 129) and now considering 3/202 (removed 199) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 3 cols
[2024-05-22 08:34:50] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:34:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 19 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 39 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 08:34:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 2 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/6 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 6/6 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 36 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/6 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 6/6 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 29 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 69ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 69ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 3/132 places, 3/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 168 ms. Remains : 3/132 places, 3/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 131 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 59 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 10 steps with 0 reset with depth 11 and stack size 11 in 0 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-14 finished in 379 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((F(p0)||X(p1)))))'
Support contains 77 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:34:50] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:34:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 4656 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 3352 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8025ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8027ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8175 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1092 reset in 218 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1071 reset in 270 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 271 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 138 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 172 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p0), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 262 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 151 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
[2024-05-22 08:35:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:35:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:35:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 173 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:35:00] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 08:35:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:35:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 91 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:35:01] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 166/270/166 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 15 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:35:01] [INFO ] Added : 166 causal constraints over 34 iterations in 581 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Support contains 77 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:35:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:35:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:35:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:35:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:35:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5416 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 4856 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10302ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10306ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10486 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 294 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 186 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 166 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (27 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p0), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 386 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 180 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 188 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
[2024-05-22 08:35:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:35:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:35:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 169 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:35:13] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-22 08:35:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:35:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 151 ms returned sat
[2024-05-22 08:35:14] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 166/270/166 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 23 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:35:15] [INFO ] Added : 166 causal constraints over 34 iterations in 720 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 192 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1034 reset in 453 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1073 reset in 456 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 195 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 77 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Performed 24 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 132 transition count 202
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 24 rules in 30 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:35:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:35:16] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
[2024-05-22 08:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 98 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved in 8220 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 25/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 142/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved in 5625 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/166 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13878ms problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 13883ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/132 places, 178/202 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 178 edges and 132 vertex of which 108 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 24 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 24 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 4 ms. Remains 108 /132 variables (removed 24) and now considering 178/178 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 108/132 places, 178/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 13929 ms. Remains : 108/132 places, 178/202 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin9953406128992418963
[2024-05-22 08:35:30] [INFO ] Built C files in 4ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin9953406128992418963
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9953406128992418963;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 582 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9953406128992418963;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 54 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin9953406128992418963;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased10735463916986948132.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 77 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:35:45] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 08:35:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:35:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:35:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:35:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6230 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5397 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11647ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11650ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11813 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16097867633618624861
[2024-05-22 08:35:57] [INFO ] Built C files in 5ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16097867633618624861
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16097867633618624861;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 797 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16097867633618624861;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 47 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16097867633618624861;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased5986407229724406840.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-22 08:36:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-22 08:36:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 08:36:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL9923089421538432378.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 08:36:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2260061272660347426.prop : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL9923089421538432378.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut16173356374539506589.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL2260061272660347426.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...318
Loading property file /tmp/LTL2260061272660347426.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut16173356374539506589.hoa
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
4 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
179 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,1.82252,55980,1,0,79,240742,29,12,3927,184943,174
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE HOA DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Treatment of property BART-COL-005-LTLFireability-15 finished in 84178 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 271753 ms.

BK_STOP 1716366974784

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BART-COL-005"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BART-COL-005, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r026-smll-171620167600388"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BART-COL-005.tgz
mv BART-COL-005 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;