Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r026-smll-171620167600386.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is BART-COL-005, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r026-smll-171620167600386
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 624K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K Apr 12 21:36 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K Apr 12 21:36 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K Apr 12 21:25 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Apr 12 21:25 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.4K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 12 22:11 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K Apr 12 22:11 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K Apr 12 21:48 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K Apr 12 21:48 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 186K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716366644439

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BART-COL-005
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-22 08:30:46] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-22 08:30:46] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-22 08:30:46] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-22 08:30:46] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-22 08:30:47] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 980 ms
[2024-05-22 08:30:47] [INFO ] Detected 3 constant HL places corresponding to 10373 PT places.
[2024-05-22 08:30:47] [INFO ] Imported 4 HL places and 7 HL transitions for a total of 11603 PT places and 7.03614756E9 transition bindings in 80 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 18 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:30:47] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 4 places and 7 transitions 26 arcs in 6 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:30:47] [INFO ] Skeletonized 2 HLPN properties in 2 ms. Removed 14 properties that had guard overlaps.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
All 16 properties of the HLPN use transition enablings in a way that makes the skeleton too coarse.
Domain [distance(41), speed(6), distance(41)] of place NewDistTable breaks symmetries in sort distance
Arc [0:1*[$db, (MOD (ADD $tsp 1) 6), $da2]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort speed
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :trainid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial detected :trainid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards detected :trainid
Applying symmetric unfolding of full symmetric sort :trainid domain size was 5
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 10619 places and 323 transitions 601 arcs in 552 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 10215 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 10487 places and 121 transitions.
Support contains 132 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 26 ms
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 253 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 186 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 482 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5591 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 3456 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9128ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9151ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9668 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Support contains 132 out of 132 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2024-05-22 08:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2024-05-22 08:30:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 24 to 20
RANDOM walk for 40007 steps (8 resets) in 593 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 1/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 134 ms. (296 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-22 08:30:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1/334 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 14 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 20ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-22 08:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-22 08:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-22 08:30:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:30:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:30:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:30:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:30:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5778 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5403 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11212ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11216ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11376 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15378361809081393380.gal : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3145091487798173121.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15378361809081393380.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3145091487798173121.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.235558,6856,2,788,5,22378,6,0,733,13230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((EX(A(((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_65>=1))||((TrainState_53>=1)||(TrainState_118>=1)))||(((TrainState_57>=1)||(TrainState...5520
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(!(EG(!(((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(Trai...9566
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 44/13659/158
(forward)formula 0,1,2.26794,48968,1,0,10,316435,34,2,4607,157243,12
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 100 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 100 transition count 170
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 73 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 73 transition count 143
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 69 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 69 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 66 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 66 transition count 136
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 63 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 63 transition count 133
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 60 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 60 transition count 130
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 57 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 57 transition count 127
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 54 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 54 transition count 124
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 52 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 52 transition count 122
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 50 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 50 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 49 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 49 transition count 119
Applied a total of 166 rules in 44 ms. Remains 49 /132 variables (removed 83) and now considering 119/202 (removed 83) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 49 cols
[2024-05-22 08:31:13] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:31:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:31:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 119/168 variables, 49/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 1584 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 119/168 variables, 49/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 83/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 1721 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3322ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3324ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/132 places, 119/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3541 ms. Remains : 49/132 places, 119/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12581492058119868433.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7153847323432077406.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12581492058119868433.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7153847323432077406.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.86968e+06,0.056105,4144,2,290,5,5547,6,0,318,3844,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((EF(AX((TrainState_42<1))) + (TrainState_0>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((E(TRUE U !(EX(!((TrainState_42<1))))) + (TrainState_0>=1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.263393,7576,1,0,9,24324,25,3,1608,15162,12
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 57 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 57 transitions
Performed 57 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 57
Iterating post reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 132 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 75 transition count 145
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 70 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 70 transition count 140
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 56 transition count 126
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 35 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 35 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 56 transition count 91
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 56 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 55 transition count 90
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 55 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 191 place count 54 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 54 transition count 89
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 54 transition count 88
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 54 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 53 transition count 87
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 53 transition count 86
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 53 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 52 transition count 85
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 52 transition count 84
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 52 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 51 transition count 83
Applied a total of 201 rules in 81 ms. Remains 51 /132 variables (removed 81) and now considering 83/202 (removed 119) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-22 08:31:16] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:31:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:31:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 08:31:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 83/134 variables, 51/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 52 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1810 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 83/134 variables, 51/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 81/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1518 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3347ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3349ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/132 places, 83/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3555 ms. Remains : 51/132 places, 83/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3074697019352668686.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9126935104764776484.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3074697019352668686.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9126935104764776484.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.47876e+06,0.202043,7228,2,302,5,19954,6,0,290,21172,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((TrainState_42>=1)||(TrainState_131>=1))||((TrainState_130>=1)||(TrainState_175>=1)))||(((TrainState_178>=1)||(TrainState_176>=...249
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((TrainState_42>=1)||(TrainState_131>=1))||((TrainState_130>=1)||(TrainState_1...309
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.297736,7492,1,0,6,19954,14,0,1404,21172,5
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:31:20] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:31:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:31:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 169 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6908 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 4618 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11561ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11565ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11796 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability196471579142216240.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17129788338682971870.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability196471579142216240.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17129788338682971870.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.223642,6972,2,788,5,22378,6,0,733,13230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((A(!((!(((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(((TrainState_176>=1)||(TrainStat...6206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((!(!(EX(!(((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(Tr...13451
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,14.3645,314112,1,0,10,1.84422e+06,32,2,4048,1.6033e+06,15
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:31:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6786 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5250 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12061ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12064ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12211 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4998950583791381133.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 08:31:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13291313361810019762.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4998950583791381133.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13291313361810019762.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.209583,6968,2,788,5,22378,6,0,733,13230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((!(A((E((TrainState_42>=1) U (TrainState_42>=1)) * ((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainState...7576
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(!((E(!(EX((TrainState_0>=1))) U (!((E((TrainState_42>=1) U (TrainState_42>=1)) * (((((...9587
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 44/0/158
(forward)formula 0,1,15.861,346864,1,0,21,2.02323e+06,44,6,4535,1.82305e+06,25
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Iterating post reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 132 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 109 transition count 179
Applied a total of 46 rules in 14 ms. Remains 109 /132 variables (removed 23) and now considering 179/202 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 109 cols
[2024-05-22 08:32:15] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:32:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 08:32:15] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 11 ms returned []
Running 143 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 179/288 variables, 109/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/288 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 288/288 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 5300 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 179/288 variables, 109/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 143/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/288 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 288/288 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved in 4057 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9382ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 143 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9385ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/132 places, 179/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9619 ms. Remains : 109/132 places, 179/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 179 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10186561171336721724.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability631872303223384728.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10186561171336721724.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability631872303223384728.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40365e+08,0.191731,6588,2,650,5,18523,6,0,618,14362,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(((TrainState_176>=1)||(TrainState_177>=1...3508
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||...3559
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.976204,18232,1,0,10,82788,25,3,3461,55043,12
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:32:26] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:32:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 08:32:26] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6662 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5492 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12172ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12174ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12346 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11021991486274451695.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9311558467147584077.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11021991486274451695.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9311558467147584077.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.218168,6972,2,788,5,22378,6,0,733,13230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF(!(E((TrainState_42>=1) U ((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainState_189>=1)))||(((TrainSta...7994
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U !(E((TrainState_42>=1) U ((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>...8049
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 200/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 200/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 42/0/160
(forward)formula 0,1,7.75607,175608,1,0,73,1.0004e+06,60,62,4519,926429,80
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:32:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6766 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5404 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12190ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12193ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12335 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8094794436435260854.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 08:32:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4250348004160607761.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8094794436435260854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4250348004160607761.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.220414,6968,2,788,5,22378,6,0,733,13230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX(!(E(!(((((((((TrainState_0>=1)||(TrainState_61>=1))||((TrainState_65>=1)||(TrainState_53>=1)))||(((TrainState_118>=1)||(TrainState_...2463
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(E(!(((((((((TrainState_0>=1)||(TrainState_61>=1))||((TrainState_65>=1)||(TrainState_53>=1)))...2522
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.935807,14944,1,0,7,66927,22,0,3782,27135,6
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:32:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:32:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 225 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:32:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 7034 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 4821 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11889ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11893ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12122 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11377789942642397085.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8835997413363049167.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11377789942642397085.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8835997413363049167.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.153161,6972,2,788,5,22378,6,0,733,13230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((EX((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))||(((TrainState_176>=1)||(TrainState_...1775
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((EX((((((TrainState_131>=1)||(TrainState_130>=1))||((TrainState_175>=1)||(TrainState_178>=1)))...1824
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,20.1005,492388,1,0,13,3.0978e+06,22,4,3785,2.43644e+06,8
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 132 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 129 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 103 transition count 173
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 102 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 102 transition count 172
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 98 transition count 168
Applied a total of 68 rules in 17 ms. Remains 98 /132 variables (removed 34) and now considering 168/202 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-22 08:33:32] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:33:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:33:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 08:33:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 4375 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 132/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 3579 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7966ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7967ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8112 ms. Remains : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability791884244574426955.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6089156456864730952.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability791884244574426955.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6089156456864730952.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.32917e+07,0.136948,5732,2,584,5,13527,6,0,563,9730,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainState_189>=1)))||(((TrainState_65>=1)||(TrainState_195>=1))...3115
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainState_189>=1)))||(((Trai...3173
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/0/167
(forward)formula 0,0,8.76901,210248,1,0,9,1.28017e+06,31,1,3010,1.07047e+06,11
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:33:49] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-22 08:33:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:33:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:33:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:33:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6894 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5439 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12352ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12354ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12501 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4770737714015024987.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2436610123929679846.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4770737714015024987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2436610123929679846.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.219954,6960,2,788,5,22378,6,0,733,13230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EX(A(EX(!((((((TrainState_131<1)&&(TrainState_130<1))&&((TrainState_175<1)&&(TrainState_178<1)))&&(((TrainState_176<1)&&(TrainState_1...2492
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(EX(!((E(!((TrainState_0<1)) U (!(EX(!((((((TrainState_131<1)&&(TrainState_130<1))&&((TrainSt...2925
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 165/0/37
(forward)formula 0,1,1.59255,38112,1,0,49,199238,29,40,4028,166662,66
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:34:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6323 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5369 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11708ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11710ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11840 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15539835034845014906.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6022571464631792227.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15539835034845014906.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6022571464631792227.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.215877,6972,2,788,5,22378,6,0,733,13230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(((AF(((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)||(TrainState_189>=1)))||(((TrainState_65>=1)||(TrainStat...10811
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(EG(!(((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((TrainState_63>=1)|...24789
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 42/2/160
(forward)formula 0,1,3.55345,80524,1,0,23,509493,54,6,4453,318666,20
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 57 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 57 transitions
Performed 57 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 57
Iterating post reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 132 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 75 transition count 145
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 70 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 70 transition count 140
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 56 transition count 126
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 35 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 35 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 56 transition count 91
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 56 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 55 transition count 90
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 55 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 191 place count 54 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 54 transition count 89
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 54 transition count 88
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 54 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 53 transition count 87
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 53 transition count 86
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 53 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 52 transition count 85
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 52 transition count 84
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 52 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 51 transition count 83
Applied a total of 201 rules in 23 ms. Remains 51 /132 variables (removed 81) and now considering 83/202 (removed 119) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-22 08:34:18] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:34:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 08:34:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 83/134 variables, 51/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 52 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1804 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 83/134 variables, 51/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 81/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1540 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3354ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3355ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/132 places, 83/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3454 ms. Remains : 51/132 places, 83/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14783732581580644186.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability450606847279932429.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14783732581580644186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability450606847279932429.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.47876e+06,0.200451,7228,2,302,5,19954,6,0,290,21172,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((TrainState_42>=1) U !((((((TrainState_131<1)&&(TrainState_130<1))&&((TrainState_175<1)&&(TrainState_178<1)))&&(((TrainState_176<1)&...241
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((TrainState_42>=1) U !((((((TrainState_131<1)&&(TrainState_130<1))&&((TrainState_175<1)&&(TrainSt...286
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 81/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,3.15313,78168,1,0,473,389155,24,314,1468,540464,322
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 132 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 68 transition count 138
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 68 transition count 134
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 64 transition count 134
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 58 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 58 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 58 transition count 127
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 54 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 54 transition count 123
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 51 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 51 transition count 120
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 48 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 48 transition count 117
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 46 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 46 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 44 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 44 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 43 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 43 transition count 112
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 37 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 37 transition count 104
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 36 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 36 transition count 101
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 35 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 35 transition count 98
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 34 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 34 transition count 95
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 33 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 33 transition count 92
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 32 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 32 transition count 89
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 31 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 31 transition count 86
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 30 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 30 transition count 83
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 11 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 29 transition count 82
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 11 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 29 transition count 80
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 12 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 28 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 12 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 28 transition count 77
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 13 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 27 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 13 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 27 transition count 74
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 14 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 26 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 14 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 26 transition count 71
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 15 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 25 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 15 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 25 transition count 68
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 16 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 24 transition count 67
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 16 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 24 transition count 65
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 17 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 23 transition count 64
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 17 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 23 transition count 62
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 18 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 22 transition count 61
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 18 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 22 transition count 59
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 19 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 21 transition count 58
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 19 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 21 transition count 56
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 20 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 20 transition count 55
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 20 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 20 transition count 53
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 21 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 19 transition count 52
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 21 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 19 transition count 50
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 22 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 18 transition count 49
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 22 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 18 transition count 47
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 23 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 17 transition count 46
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 23 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 17 transition count 44
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 24 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 16 transition count 43
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 24 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 16 transition count 41
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 25 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 15 transition count 40
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 25 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 15 transition count 38
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 26 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 14 transition count 37
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 26 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 14 transition count 35
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 27 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 13 transition count 34
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 27 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 13 transition count 32
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 28 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 12 transition count 31
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 28 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 12 transition count 29
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 29 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 11 transition count 28
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 29 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 11 transition count 26
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 30 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 10 transition count 25
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 30 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 10 transition count 23
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 31 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 9 transition count 22
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 31 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 9 transition count 20
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 32 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 8 transition count 19
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 32 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 8 transition count 17
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 33 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 7 transition count 16
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 33 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 7 transition count 14
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 34 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 6 transition count 13
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 34 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 6 transition count 11
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 35 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 5 transition count 10
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 35 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 5 transition count 8
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 36 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 4 transition count 7
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 36 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 4 transition count 4
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 37 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 3 transition count 3
Applied a total of 328 rules in 82 ms. Remains 3 /132 variables (removed 129) and now considering 3/202 (removed 199) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 3 cols
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 56 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 2 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/6 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 6/6 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 40 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/6 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 6/6 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 49 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 93ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 93ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 3/132 places, 3/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 238 ms. Remains : 3/132 places, 3/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 3 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12310117919315132829.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16524830605338620516.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12310117919315132829.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16524830605338620516.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,21,0.003666,3284,2,14,5,151,6,0,18,148,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF((TrainState_0>=1)) + (TrainState_42>=1)) + (TrainState_0>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U (TrainState_0>=1)) + (TrainState_42>=1)) + (TrainState_0>=1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.006922,3600,1,0,7,207,19,3,81,237,11
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 6576 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5503 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12101ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12104ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12307 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:34:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10922561463267646510.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-22 08:34:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11029284240056979298.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10922561463267646510.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11029284240056979298.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.217236,6972,2,788,5,22378,6,0,733,13230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(AX(!((((((TrainState_131<1)&&(TrainState_130<1))&&((TrainState_175<1)&&(TrainState_178<1)))&&(((TrainState_176<1)&&(TrainState_177<1)...12517
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(((!((!((E(!((TrainState_42>=1)) U (!(((((((((TrainState_61>=1)||(TrainState_191>=1))||((Train...34395
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 200/0/2
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 200/0/2
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 08:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-22 08:35:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 08:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1425617034367749091.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1425617034367749091.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1425617034367749091.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1425617034367749091.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1425617034367749091.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 08:35:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 08:35:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 08:35:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2024-05-22 08:35:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 19 labels/synchronizations in 21 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:35:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6555563765359112755.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-22 08:35:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5136840322354515738.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6555563765359112755.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5136840322354515738.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.546988,13920,230,97,20264,3561,417,40960,109,9981,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(AX(!((((((i4.i0.u47.TrainState_131<1)&&(i5.i1.u46.TrainState_130<1))&&((i5.i1.u46.TrainState_175<1)&&(i1.i1.u16.TrainState_178<1)))&&...17384
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(((!((!((E(!((i5.i1.u0.TrainState_42>=1)) U (!(((((((((i1.i1.u3.TrainState_61>=1)||(i8.i3.u51....47714
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-22 08:35:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 08:35:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-22 08:35:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 08:35:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14603733901773981783.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14603733901773981783.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14603733901773981783.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14603733901773981783.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14603733901773981783.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-22 08:35:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 08:35:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 08:35:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 44 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:35:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-22 08:35:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:35:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability53809930758361918.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-22 08:35:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12125719282810133474.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability53809930758361918.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12125719282810133474.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.388472,14632,254,109,21365,3914,406,42871,119,8154,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(AX(!((((((i2.u13.TrainState_131<1)&&(i0.u31.TrainState_130<1))&&((i0.u31.TrainState_175<1)&&(i8.u47.TrainState_178<1)))&&(((i3.u6.Tra...16563
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(((!((!((E(!((i0.u0.TrainState_42>=1)) U (!(((((((((i4.u2.TrainState_61>=1)||(i7.u49.TrainStat...45459
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2024-05-22 08:44:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-22 08:44:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-22 08:44:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-22 08:44:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-22 08:44:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 140 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-22 08:44:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2024-05-22 08:44:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-22 08:44:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2742501684222984912.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-22 08:44:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4635341394788733969.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2742501684222984912.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4635341394788733969.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59933e+08,0.201491,9128,794,7,10211,337,473,6958,5,229,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(AX(!((((((trainidspeeddistance131.TrainState_131<1)&&(trainidspeeddistance130.TrainState_130<1))&&((trainidspeeddistance175.TrainStat...25524
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(((!((!((E(!((trainidspeeddistance42.TrainState_42>=1)) U (!(((((((((trainidspeeddistance61.Tr...69948
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 105
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 113
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 120
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 121
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 128
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
(forward)formula 0,0,424.555,9485032,1,0,1.914e+07,337,1349,3.40307e+07,19,386,1894995
FORMULA BART-COL-005-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 1243928 ms.

BK_STOP 1716367890008

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BART-COL-005"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BART-COL-005, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r026-smll-171620167600386"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BART-COL-005.tgz
mv BART-COL-005 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;