Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r026-smll-171620167000106.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-04a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r026-smll-171620167000106
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 488K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Apr 22 14:28 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Apr 22 14:28 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 22 14:28 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 22 14:28 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 12 22:12 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 159K Apr 12 22:12 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K Apr 12 22:10 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K Apr 12 22:10 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:28 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 22 14:28 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716252656004

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-04a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-21 00:50:58] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-21 00:50:58] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-21 00:50:58] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 83 ms
[2024-05-21 00:50:58] [INFO ] Transformed 107 places.
[2024-05-21 00:50:58] [INFO ] Transformed 105 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:50:58] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-21 00:50:58] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 107 places and 105 transitions and 340 arcs in 253 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 21 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 20 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 20 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 107 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 107 /107 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 107 cols
[2024-05-21 00:50:59] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-21 00:50:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 501 ms returned [37, 80]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 556 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 616 ms. Remains : 105/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 105 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-21 00:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2024-05-21 00:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
Support contains 75 out of 105 places (down from 81) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 58 to 50
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1354 resets) in 3122 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 8/50 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (256 resets) in 321 ms. (124 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (239 resets) in 198 ms. (201 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (257 resets) in 98 ms. (404 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (316 resets) in 72 ms. (548 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (211 resets) in 125 ms. (317 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (185 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (250 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:01] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp53 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 63/84 variables, 15/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 63/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 21/105 variables, 11/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 21/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 85/190 variables, 105/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 19/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/190 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 190/190 variables, and 255 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved in 513 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 105/105 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 68/78 variables, 9/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 68/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/105 variables, 17/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 27/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 85/190 variables, 105/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 19/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 4/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/190 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 190/190 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved in 517 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 105/105 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1102ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 92 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 105 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 75
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 88 transition count 68
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 62
Free-agglomeration rule applied 7 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 82 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 75 transition count 55
Applied a total of 60 rules in 80 ms. Remains 75 /105 variables (removed 30) and now considering 55/85 (removed 30) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 80 ms. Remains : 75/105 places, 55/85 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (730 resets) in 467 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 1989 steps (9 resets) in 30 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
Support contains 61 out of 105 places (down from 63) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 243 ms returned [7, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 257 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 88 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 88 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 87 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 87 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 86 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 86 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 85 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 85 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 84 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 84 transition count 76
Applied a total of 18 rules in 47 ms. Remains 84 /93 variables (removed 9) and now considering 76/85 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 84 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 229 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 84/105 places, 76/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 543 ms. Remains : 84/105 places, 76/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12111128690620894504.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12750426432700985897.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12111128690620894504.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12750426432700985897.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.95923e+06,0.157677,6468,2,806,5,11381,6,0,412,16236,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((EF(((p14==1)&&(p73==1))) + AG(AF((p68==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((E(TRUE U ((p14==1)&&(p73==1))) + !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p68==1)))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t57, t65, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,3.05021,80536,1,0,641,509952,181,323,2467,423287,760
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:06] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 212 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 87 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 83 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 82 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 81 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 81 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 80 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 80 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 79 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 79 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 78 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 78 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 77 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 77 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 76 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 76 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 75 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 75 transition count 68
Applied a total of 34 rules in 46 ms. Remains 75 /92 variables (removed 17) and now considering 68/85 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 231 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 494 ms. Remains : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7027785403892517260.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3998098741815331179.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7027785403892517260.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3998098741815331179.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92646e+06,0.145094,6748,2,769,5,12902,6,0,370,18996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(AX((p2==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((p2==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t33, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,1.59259,48560,1,0,186,271162,158,93,2211,196871,209
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned [7, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 163 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 90 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 90 transition count 81
Applied a total of 8 rules in 4 ms. Remains 90 /94 variables (removed 4) and now considering 81/85 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 90 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/105 places, 81/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 354 ms. Remains : 90/105 places, 81/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13479241309489383514.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11331876108243607477.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13479241309489383514.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11331876108243607477.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.99635e+06,0.098199,6500,2,818,5,12586,6,0,441,16035,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AG((EF(((p14==0)||(p73==0))) + AG((p19==0))))) * A(A((((AX(((p71==1)||(p30==1))) + E(((p14==1)&&(p65==1)) U ((p8==1)&&(p59==1)))) + (...280
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p14==0)||(p73==0))))),TRUE) * !((p19==0)))] = FALSE * (([FwdG((FwdU(...620
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 78/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,0.284229,10988,1,0,11,37990,20,4,2128,23560,9
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned [14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 209 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 88 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 88 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 87 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 87 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 86 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 86 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 85 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 85 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 84 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 84 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 83 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 83 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 82 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 82 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 81 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 81 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 80 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 80 transition count 72
Applied a total of 26 rules in 30 ms. Remains 80 /93 variables (removed 13) and now considering 72/85 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 80 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 225 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/105 places, 72/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 467 ms. Remains : 80/105 places, 72/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1864843055909509894.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12669901874244537820.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1864843055909509894.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12669901874244537820.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.94285e+06,0.083708,6256,2,774,5,11112,6,0,392,15815,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(!(AX(((p7==1)&&(p54==1))))) U (p51==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(!(!(EX(!(((p7==1)&&(p54==1)))))))) * (p51==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, t61, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,1,1.46114,39700,1,0,323,185194,166,205,2254,258832,355
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:11] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned [14, 28, 31, 34, 61, 84, 96, 102]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 131 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 94 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 94 transition count 82
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 94 /97 variables (removed 3) and now considering 82/85 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:11] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 00:51:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 249 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 94/105 places, 82/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 384 ms. Remains : 94/105 places, 82/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16646199342052713030.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2202406297744443700.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16646199342052713030.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2202406297744443700.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.18557e+06,0.139583,8132,2,1894,5,17833,6,0,454,23222,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((EF(((p13==1)&&(p89==1))) * !(A(((p92==1)&&(p105==1)) U ((p40==1)&&(p103==1))))) * (((p93==0)||(p106==0))||(p2==0)))) + ((EG(AG(((p6...383
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((Init * !(EG(((E(TRUE U ((p13==1)&&(p89==1))) * !(!((E(!(((p40==1)&&(p103==1))) U (!(((p92==1)&&(p105==1))) ...1560
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step enab...207
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,23.8853,502616,1,0,1325,3.43818e+06,238,776,2938,2.33748e+06,1633
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 105 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 75
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 88 transition count 68
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 62
Applied a total of 46 rules in 16 ms. Remains 82 /105 variables (removed 23) and now considering 62/85 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 82 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned [12, 17, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 43, 62, 68, 73, 79]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 137 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/105 places, 62/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 67 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 57 transition count 52
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 57 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 49 transition count 44
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 45 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 45 transition count 40
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 44 transition count 39
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 44 transition count 39
Applied a total of 46 rules in 7 ms. Remains 44 /67 variables (removed 23) and now considering 39/62 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/105 places, 39/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 287 ms. Remains : 44/105 places, 39/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8453143053607929173.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7698543927314495637.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8453143053607929173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7698543927314495637.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,12417,0.021574,3916,2,265,5,2441,6,0,215,2800,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(((AF(((p99==1)&&(p106==1))) + EF((p13==0))) + ((p6==0)||((p7==1)&&(p72==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(((!(EG(!(((p99==1)&&(p106==1))))) + E(TRUE U (p13==0))) + ((p6==0)||((p7==1)&&(p72==1)))...170
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t8, t15, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/...172
(forward)formula 0,1,0.217562,10516,1,0,268,42918,110,135,1407,45072,312
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 105 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 97 transition count 77
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 97 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 92 transition count 72
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 85 transition count 65
Applied a total of 40 rules in 13 ms. Remains 85 /105 variables (removed 20) and now considering 65/85 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 85 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:36] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned [6, 11, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 43, 64, 70, 76, 82, 84]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 166 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/105 places, 65/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 69 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 48 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 47 transition count 43
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 47 transition count 42
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 46 transition count 42
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 42 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 42 transition count 38
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 41 transition count 37
Applied a total of 56 rules in 9 ms. Remains 41 /69 variables (removed 28) and now considering 37/65 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 41 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 41/105 places, 37/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 367 ms. Remains : 41/105 places, 37/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 37 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15374748469075583275.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16006375481191578626.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15374748469075583275.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16006375481191578626.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16129,0.023139,3884,2,283,5,1774,6,0,203,1787,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p68==0) + ((EF(((p3==0)||(p82==0))) * (p35==1)) * (p96==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p68==0))) * !(E(TRUE U ((p3==0)||(p82==0)))))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p68==...245
(forward)formula 0,0,0.02448,4148,1,0,9,1774,11,4,211,1787,2
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 211 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 213 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 87 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 83 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 82 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 81 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 81 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 80 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 80 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 79 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 79 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 78 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 78 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 77 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 77 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 76 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 76 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 75 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 75 transition count 68
Applied a total of 34 rules in 18 ms. Remains 75 /92 variables (removed 17) and now considering 68/85 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 459 ms. Remains : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability64204472524179465.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18150666181467814343.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability64204472524179465.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18150666181467814343.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92646e+06,0.153406,6748,2,769,5,12902,6,0,370,18996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX((p17==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX((p17==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t33, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,1,1.45561,40980,1,0,327,204655,158,199,2119,269733,278
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 198 ms returned [7, 21, 31, 34, 39, 61, 84, 90, 102, 104]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 199 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 91 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 91 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 90 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 90 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 89 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 89 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 88 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 88 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 87 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 87 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 86 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 86 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 85 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 85 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 84 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 84 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 83 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 83 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 82 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 82 transition count 72
Applied a total of 26 rules in 15 ms. Remains 82 /95 variables (removed 13) and now considering 72/85 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 82 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 240 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 82/105 places, 72/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 456 ms. Remains : 82/105 places, 72/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6351084966052639883.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11090935013226112130.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6351084966052639883.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11090935013226112130.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.04373e+06,0.264752,9704,2,1228,5,22761,6,0,398,35843,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((((EX(((p28==1)&&(p75==1))) * AX(((p14==1)&&(p73==1)))) * ((p98==1)&&(p105==1))) * (p9==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((EX(((p28==1)&&(p75==1))) * !(EX(!(((p14==1)&&(p73==1)))))) * ((p98==1)&&(p10...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, t61, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,0.729204,16572,1,0,150,69939,169,76,2361,54219,164
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 170 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 183 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 87 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 83 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 82 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 81 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 81 transition count 74
Applied a total of 22 rules in 11 ms. Remains 81 /92 variables (removed 11) and now considering 74/85 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 81 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 81/105 places, 74/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 396 ms. Remains : 81/105 places, 74/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4442142443949536550.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3628501109035467808.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4442142443949536550.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3628501109035467808.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.95104e+06,0.137344,6788,2,810,5,13021,6,0,400,19021,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(E(EG(((p26==1)||(p70==1))) U AF((p70==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(EY(Init)),EG(((p26==1)||(p70==1)))) * !(EG(!((p70==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t59, t65, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,1,2.33346,66892,1,0,689,420669,180,331,2268,360331,802
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 105 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 75
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 88 transition count 68
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 62
Applied a total of 46 rules in 9 ms. Remains 82 /105 variables (removed 23) and now considering 62/85 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 82 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned [12, 17, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 43, 62, 68, 73, 79]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 118 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/105 places, 62/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 67 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 57 transition count 52
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 57 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 49 transition count 44
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 45 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 45 transition count 40
Applied a total of 44 rules in 6 ms. Remains 45 /67 variables (removed 22) and now considering 40/62 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 45 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/105 places, 40/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 239 ms. Remains : 45/105 places, 40/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3595551978059536695.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3006870291854154189.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3595551978059536695.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3006870291854154189.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,12481,0.018567,3932,2,320,5,2394,6,0,220,2473,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(A(AG((A((p9==1) U ((p4==1)&&(p76==1))) * A(((p87==1)&&(p106==1)) U ((p7==1)&&(p64==1))))) U !(EF((p13!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U (p13!=1)))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!(((p4==1)&&(p76==1))) U (!((p9==1)) * !(((p4...399
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t15, t32, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inter...177
(forward)formula 0,1,0.613036,18812,1,0,551,94940,126,276,1459,93054,668
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 105 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 75
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 88 transition count 68
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 81 transition count 61
Applied a total of 48 rules in 8 ms. Remains 81 /105 variables (removed 24) and now considering 61/85 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 81 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [5, 10, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 42, 61, 67, 72, 78, 80]
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 128 ms to find 17 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/105 places, 61/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 23 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 23 transitions
Performed 23 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 23
Iterating post reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 64 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 41 transition count 38
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 36 transition count 33
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 36 transition count 33
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 35 transition count 32
Applied a total of 58 rules in 6 ms. Remains 35 /64 variables (removed 29) and now considering 32/61 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 35 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/105 places, 32/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 233 ms. Remains : 35/105 places, 32/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14684222462233569862.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8957958097802211537.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14684222462233569862.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8957958097802211537.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6273,0.01068,3540,2,237,5,1022,6,0,174,934,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((p20==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(p20==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 27/0/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.033923,4384,1,0,11,5494,19,3,861,4102,9
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned [14, 21, 31, 34, 39, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 91 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 91 transition count 81
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 91 /95 variables (removed 4) and now considering 81/85 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 91 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 173 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 253 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/105 places, 81/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 355 ms. Remains : 91/105 places, 81/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8820081790379214701.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2377048035079224593.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8820081790379214701.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2377048035079224593.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.08059e+06,0.198489,7580,2,1284,5,15640,6,0,443,21468,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p13!=1) U (AG(!(((p87==1)&&(p106==1)))) + (!(AG(A(((p28==1)&&(p45==1)) U ((p3==1)&&(p82==1))))) * E(!(E(((p15==1)&&(p60==1)) U (p20==1...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(p13!=1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(((p87==1)&&(p106==1)))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,(p13!=1)) * ...371
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step enab...207
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 76/0/5
(forward)formula 0,1,6.04616,150236,1,0,1085,981285,217,542,2859,813366,1260
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:50] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 152 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 153 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 87 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 83 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 82 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 81 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 81 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 80 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 80 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 79 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 79 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 78 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 78 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 77 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 77 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 76 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 76 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 75 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 75 transition count 68
Applied a total of 34 rules in 16 ms. Remains 75 /92 variables (removed 17) and now considering 68/85 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 119 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 204 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 374 ms. Remains : 75/105 places, 68/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1391400624323268411.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12840625005875339517.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1391400624323268411.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12840625005875339517.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92646e+06,0.156197,6748,2,769,5,12902,6,0,370,18996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((((p5==1)&&(p24==1))&&(p100==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((((p5==1)&&(p24==1))&&(p100==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t33, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,1.33688,37732,1,0,314,178770,159,200,2128,246343,280
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:52] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 216 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 31, 34, 39, 61, 84, 90, 96, 102, 104]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 217 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/105 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 88 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 88 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 87 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 87 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 86 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 86 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 85 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 85 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 84 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 84 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 83 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 83 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 82 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 82 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 81 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 81 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 80 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 80 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 79 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 79 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 78 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 78 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 77 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 77 transition count 69
Applied a total of 32 rules in 6 ms. Remains 77 /93 variables (removed 16) and now considering 69/85 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 77 cols
[2024-05-21 00:51:52] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2024-05-21 00:51:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-21 00:51:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-21 00:51:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 77/105 places, 69/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 458 ms. Remains : 77/105 places, 69/85 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2024-05-21 00:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14515483318458795043.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5740779282917374567.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14515483318458795043.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5740779282917374567.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.93056e+06,0.156293,6772,2,856,5,12768,6,0,377,18938,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p36==0) + EX(((p28==0)||(p57==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p36==0))) * !(EX(((p28==0)||(p57==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, t61, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,1,0.409839,10732,1,0,140,39923,156,71,2119,30250,146
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-21 00:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-21 00:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 55122 ms.

BK_STOP 1716252713690

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-04a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-04a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r026-smll-171620167000106"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-04a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-04a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;