About the Execution of ITS-Tools for AutoFlight-PT-03a
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 353.455 | 25008.00 | 40170.00 | 261.30 | FTTFFTTTTFFFTTFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r026-smll-171620167000089.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-03a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r026-smll-171620167000089
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 444K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 22 14:28 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K Apr 22 14:28 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 22 14:28 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 22 14:28 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.0K Apr 12 22:09 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 94K Apr 12 22:09 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K Apr 12 22:07 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K Apr 12 22:07 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:28 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 22 14:28 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716248579019
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-03a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-20 23:43:00] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-20 23:43:00] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-20 23:43:01] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 80 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:01] [INFO ] Transformed 82 places.
[2024-05-20 23:43:01] [INFO ] Transformed 80 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:01] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-20 23:43:01] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 82 places and 80 transitions and 260 arcs in 252 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 27 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 15 transitions.
Support contains 56 out of 82 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 82/82 places, 65/65 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 25 ms. Remains 82 /82 variables (removed 0) and now considering 65/65 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 82 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:01] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 15 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 347 ms returned [14, 30, 47, 61, 73, 81]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 395 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/82 places, 65/65 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 65/65 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 452 ms. Remains : 76/82 places, 65/65 transitions.
Support contains 56 out of 76 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
Support contains 55 out of 76 places (down from 56) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 60 to 55
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1462 resets) in 1766 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 2/55 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (343 resets) in 388 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (301 resets) in 185 ms. (215 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 5/141 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 51 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 2/76 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/16 constraints, State Equation: 0/76 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 106ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Applied a total of 4 rules in 16 ms. Remains 74 /76 variables (removed 2) and now considering 63/65 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned [7, 20, 23, 26, 62, 72]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 129 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/76 places, 63/65 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 67 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 67 transition count 62
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 67 /68 variables (removed 1) and now considering 62/63 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 67 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 67/76 places, 62/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 322 ms. Remains : 67/76 places, 62/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14639223262931316339.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6809120864868215684.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14639223262931316339.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6809120864868215684.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,148393,0.056483,4760,2,531,5,6025,6,0,332,7587,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AX(EG((p40==0)))) * EG((((p74==0)||(p32==1)) * EF((A((p70==1) U (p77==1)) * EG((p28==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(EG((p40==0))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EG((((p74==0)||(p32==1)) * E(TRUE U (!((E(!((p77==1)) U...235
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t28, t37, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (dest...196
(forward)formula 0,0,1.05368,34504,1,0,528,218520,165,260,1867,179615,618
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 73 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 73 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 72 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 72 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 71 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 71 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 70 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 70 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 69 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 69 transition count 58
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 68 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 68 transition count 57
Applied a total of 16 rules in 32 ms. Remains 68 /76 variables (removed 8) and now considering 57/65 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:04] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned [7, 20, 23, 26, 56, 66]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 84 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/76 places, 57/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 60 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 60 transition count 55
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 59 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 59 transition count 54
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 58 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 58 transition count 53
Applied a total of 8 rules in 7 ms. Remains 58 /62 variables (removed 4) and now considering 53/57 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:04] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 58/76 places, 53/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 282 ms. Remains : 58/76 places, 53/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10362285197200175818.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1975510334429816826.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10362285197200175818.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1975510334429816826.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,143785,0.066081,5568,2,482,5,7894,6,0,287,11734,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(E((p3==1) U ((((p3==1)||(p71==1))||((p19==0)||(p41==1))) * !((AF((p28==1)) + EF((p62==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(EY(Init),(p3==1)) * (((p3==1)||(p71==1))||((p19==0)||(p41==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U (p62==1)))),!((p28==1...167
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t22, t28, t31, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. ...201
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 48/0/5
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 51/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.713095,25628,1,0,148,129152,146,76,1859,103099,176
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 73 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 73 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 72 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 72 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 71 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 71 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 70 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 70 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 69 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 69 transition count 58
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 68 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 68 transition count 57
Applied a total of 16 rules in 13 ms. Remains 68 /76 variables (removed 8) and now considering 57/65 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [20, 23, 26, 56, 66]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/76 places, 57/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 61 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 61 transition count 55
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 61 /63 variables (removed 2) and now considering 55/57 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 61 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 61/76 places, 55/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 264 ms. Remains : 61/76 places, 55/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16614059746282193578.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17793972252592626585.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16614059746282193578.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17793972252592626585.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,139489,0.042013,4804,2,549,5,5304,6,0,299,6853,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(AF(((p46==0)&&(p70==1)))) + ((EX((p64==0)) * AG((p58==0))) * (p7==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((p46==0)&&(p70==1)))))))))] != FALSE + [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p7==0)) ...209
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t25, t34, t45, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. ...201
(forward)formula 0,1,0.713991,27308,1,0,426,154347,138,210,1800,148516,480
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 71 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 50 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 49 transition count 42
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 49 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 42 transition count 38
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 42 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 39 transition count 35
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 38 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 38 transition count 34
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 29 transition count 25
Applied a total of 85 rules in 28 ms. Remains 29 /76 variables (removed 47) and now considering 25/65 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned [22, 27]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 27/76 places, 25/65 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 27 /27 variables (removed 0) and now considering 25/25 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 92 ms. Remains : 27/76 places, 25/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2099610874602959239.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14526308490402670394.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2099610874602959239.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14526308490402670394.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,960,0.006432,3476,2,82,5,560,6,0,136,483,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((p50==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((p50==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.012008,3792,1,0,7,1551,15,1,594,665,5
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 73 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 73 transition count 62
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 73 /76 variables (removed 3) and now considering 62/65 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 73 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [7, 20, 23, 26, 61, 71]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/76 places, 62/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 65 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 65 transition count 60
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 65 /67 variables (removed 2) and now considering 60/62 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 65/76 places, 60/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 230 ms. Remains : 65/76 places, 60/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2800155578189061735.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4436161045674587908.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2800155578189061735.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4436161045674587908.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,142049,0.042259,4820,2,492,5,5276,6,0,322,6753,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AG(EX(TRUE))) * AX(!(E(((!(AF(((p66==0)||(p57==1)))) + (p52==0)) + (p54==1)) U (p33==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(TRUE)))))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(EY(Init),((!(!(EG(!(((p66==0)||(p57==1)))))) + (p52...195
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t27, t35, t36, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. ...201
(forward)formula 0,0,0.502125,18120,1,0,259,82056,150,187,1817,96915,375
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 76 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 69 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 68 transition count 57
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 68 transition count 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 60 transition count 49
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 59 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 59 transition count 48
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 51 transition count 40
Applied a total of 50 rules in 16 ms. Remains 51 /76 variables (removed 25) and now considering 40/65 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned [5, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 49]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 76 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/76 places, 40/65 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 43 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 36 transition count 31
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 34 transition count 31
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 34 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 32 transition count 29
Applied a total of 22 rules in 4 ms. Remains 32 /43 variables (removed 11) and now considering 29/40 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 32 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 32/76 places, 29/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 257 ms. Remains : 32/76 places, 29/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13429121090517834028.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5901490427056663958.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13429121090517834028.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5901490427056663958.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1153,0.008516,3500,2,164,5,770,6,0,159,576,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(E(((p69==1)||(p48==0)) U EF(((p67==0)||(p40==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(E(((p69==1)||(p48==0)) U E(TRUE U ((p67==0)||(p40==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 25/0/4
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.06483,5664,1,0,44,14647,32,37,835,10766,45
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 74 /76 variables (removed 2) and now considering 63/65 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [7, 23, 26, 62, 72]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/76 places, 63/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 67 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 67 transition count 61
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 67 /69 variables (removed 2) and now considering 61/63 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 67 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 67/76 places, 61/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 226 ms. Remains : 67/76 places, 61/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7217736940048157057.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17434767504409804796.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7217736940048157057.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17434767504409804796.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,142561,0.059766,4840,2,482,5,6196,6,0,329,8002,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(AF((p40==1)) U AX((AG((((p32==0)||(p58==1))&&(p21==1))) * ((EF(((p69==0)||(p76==1))) + EG((p10==0))) + EX(TRUE))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(EY((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((((p32==0)||(p58==1))&&(p21==1))))) * ((E(TRUE U ((p69==0)||(p76==...682
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t28, t37, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (dest...196
(forward)formula 0,1,3.0332,77740,1,0,887,463066,163,479,2072,483573,1030
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 73 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 73 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 72 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 72 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 71 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 71 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 70 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 70 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 69 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 69 transition count 58
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 68 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 68 transition count 57
Applied a total of 16 rules in 5 ms. Remains 68 /76 variables (removed 8) and now considering 57/65 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [7, 20, 26, 56, 66]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/76 places, 57/65 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 60 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 60 transition count 54
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /63 variables (removed 3) and now considering 54/57 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 60/76 places, 54/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 191 ms. Remains : 60/76 places, 54/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6720541532993529528.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1126912763409465729.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6720541532993529528.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1126912763409465729.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,138977,0.039589,4784,2,563,5,5432,6,0,294,7059,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A((EG((p0!=0)) + ((EF((p65==1)) * (p76==0)) * ((p63==0)&&(p58==1)))) U EG(EF((p6==0)))) U !(A(EG(!(AX(((p13==0)||(p56==1))))) U (p24==0...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!((E(!((p24==0)) U (!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((p13==0)||(p56==1)))))))) * !((p24==0)))) + EG(!((p24==0))...568
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t24, t33, t43, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. ...201
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,2.17458,65780,1,0,539,411633,153,293,1841,339155,716
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 71 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 50 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 49 transition count 42
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 49 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 42 transition count 38
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 42 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 39 transition count 35
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 38 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 38 transition count 34
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 29 transition count 25
Applied a total of 85 rules in 9 ms. Remains 29 /76 variables (removed 47) and now considering 25/65 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [22, 27]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 27/76 places, 25/65 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 27 /27 variables (removed 0) and now considering 25/25 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 69 ms. Remains : 27/76 places, 25/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality737011077889832101.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11697340375366222295.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality737011077889832101.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11697340375366222295.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,960,0.007328,3472,2,94,5,597,6,0,136,512,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p35==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p35==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 23/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.015889,3788,1,0,8,1941,19,4,634,1410,8
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 73 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 73 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 72 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 72 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 71 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 71 transition count 60
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 71 /76 variables (removed 5) and now considering 60/65 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 71 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned [7, 20, 23, 26, 59, 69]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 95 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/76 places, 60/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 63 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 58
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 58/60 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 63/76 places, 58/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 244 ms. Remains : 63/76 places, 58/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 58 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8795538699227748844.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10973414322863342732.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8795538699227748844.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10973414322863342732.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,141025,0.073878,4808,2,517,5,6087,6,0,312,8063,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(AG((p35==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !((p35==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t34, t45, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. ...201
(forward)formula 0,0,0.261391,8504,1,0,116,28205,138,59,1751,18759,129
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 73 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 73 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 72 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 72 transition count 61
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 72 /76 variables (removed 4) and now considering 61/65 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned [7, 20, 23, 26, 60]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 105 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/76 places, 61/65 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 66 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 66 transition count 60
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 66 /67 variables (removed 1) and now considering 60/61 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 66 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 66/76 places, 60/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 268 ms. Remains : 66/76 places, 60/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8548179837439637775.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5223453215463219084.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8548179837439637775.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5223453215463219084.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,147369,0.063384,4564,2,588,5,5231,6,0,326,6393,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p34==0)||(p57==1)) U ((!(((EF(((p69==0)||(p71==1))) + (p26==0)) + ((p45==0)||(p3==1)))) * EF((EX((p42==1)) * (p1!=1)))) * (((AF((p66=...305
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(((E(TRUE U ((p69==0)||(p71==1))) + (p26==0)) + ((p45==0)||(p3==1)))) * E(TRUE U (EX((p42==1...994
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t26, t33, t35, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. ...201
(forward)formula 0,0,2.58683,65152,1,0,887,424799,177,492,1967,355398,1154
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 65/65 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned [7, 23, 26, 63, 74]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 135 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 69 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 69 transition count 63
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 69 /71 variables (removed 2) and now considering 63/65 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 69 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 69/76 places, 63/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 333 ms. Remains : 69/76 places, 63/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10345397390299158990.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14213080253242424775.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10345397390299158990.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14213080253242424775.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,150121,0.070782,4848,2,595,5,5551,6,0,339,6512,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(AF(!((((p75==0)||(p55==1))&&((p58==0)||(p56==0))))) U (EF((p21!=1)) * (!(AX(((p65==0)||(p66==1)))) + !((((p68==1)||(p70==0))||((p45=...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!((E(TRUE U (p21!=1)) * (!(!(EX(!(((p65==0)||(p66==1)))))) + !((((p68==1)||(p70==0))||((p45==...558
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t28, t55, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (dest...196
(forward)formula 0,0,1.8457,42640,1,0,527,260365,159,273,2045,226556,621
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 73 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 73 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 72 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 72 transition count 61
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 72 /76 variables (removed 4) and now considering 61/65 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [7, 20, 23, 26, 60, 70]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/76 places, 61/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 64 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 64 transition count 59
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 64 /66 variables (removed 2) and now considering 59/61 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 64/76 places, 59/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 183 ms. Remains : 64/76 places, 59/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality519216940548399464.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality482288848032612934.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality519216940548399464.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality482288848032612934.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,141537,0.056101,4816,2,504,5,5485,6,0,317,7065,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF(EG((p59==0))) + AX((p53==0))) + (((p64==1) * EG(!(E((p37==1) U ((p65==0)||(p40==1)))))) + ((p71==0)&&(p34==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U EG((p59==0))) + !(EX(!((p53==0))))) + (((p64==1) * EG(!(E((p37==1) U ((p65==0)||(p40==1)))...194
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t26, t33, t35, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. ...201
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1.07013,32188,1,0,478,187766,162,272,2037,170577,592
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 73 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 73 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 72 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 72 transition count 61
Applied a total of 8 rules in 5 ms. Remains 72 /76 variables (removed 4) and now considering 61/65 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [7, 20, 23, 26, 60, 70]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/76 places, 61/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 64 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 64 transition count 59
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 64 /66 variables (removed 2) and now considering 59/61 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 64/76 places, 59/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 261 ms. Remains : 64/76 places, 59/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9723183859906584820.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6139216762521889686.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9723183859906584820.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6139216762521889686.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,141537,0.06996,4816,2,504,5,5485,6,0,317,7065,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX((p51==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * (p51==1))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.079673,5080,1,0,7,5485,8,1,529,7065,2
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 73 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 73 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 72 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 72 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 71 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 71 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 70 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 70 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 69 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 69 transition count 58
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 68 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 68 transition count 57
Applied a total of 16 rules in 7 ms. Remains 68 /76 variables (removed 8) and now considering 57/65 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [7, 20, 23, 26, 56, 66]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/76 places, 57/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 60 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 60 transition count 55
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 60 /62 variables (removed 2) and now considering 55/57 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 181 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 60/76 places, 55/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 281 ms. Remains : 60/76 places, 55/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5451615837520451232.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5159579586471612709.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5451615837520451232.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5159579586471612709.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,139489,0.075384,5052,2,532,5,6277,6,0,297,8402,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AF(((p55==0)&&(p18==1))) * ((p40==0)||(p26==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),!(((p55==0)&&(p18==1))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(((p40==0)||(p26==1))))] = FALSE)
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 51/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.202753,7164,1,0,13,19188,22,5,1431,11553,11
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 65/65 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 73 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 73 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 72 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 72 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 71 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 71 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 70 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 70 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 69 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 69 transition count 58
Applied a total of 14 rules in 5 ms. Remains 69 /76 variables (removed 7) and now considering 58/65 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 69 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [7, 20, 23, 26, 57, 67]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/76 places, 58/65 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 62 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 62 transition count 57
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 62 /63 variables (removed 1) and now considering 57/58 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-20 23:43:22] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 23:43:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 23:43:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 62/76 places, 57/65 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 222 ms. Remains : 62/76 places, 57/65 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 57 transitions.
[2024-05-20 23:43:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3692609318192169173.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3300772762833626800.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3692609318192169173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3300772762833626800.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,145833,0.0705,4800,2,563,5,5608,6,0,307,7027,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(((((p15==0)||(p57==1))&&(p37==1)) + AG(((p62==0)||(p54==1))))) * (p62==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(((((p15==0)||(p57==1))&&(p37==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !(((p62==0)||(p54==1))))))))) * (p62==0))))]...163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t34, t43, t47, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. ...201
(forward)formula 0,0,1.75023,41628,1,0,296,218561,144,183,1830,234856,283
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
[2024-05-20 23:43:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 23:43:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 23077 ms.
BK_STOP 1716248604027
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-03a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-03a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r026-smll-171620167000089"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-03a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-03a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;