About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for BART-COL-050
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
3381.304 | 699260.00 | 775797.00 | 1899.70 | FF?FFFTFFFFFFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r025-smll-171620166600428.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is BART-COL-050, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r025-smll-171620166600428
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 764K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K Apr 13 01:28 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K Apr 13 01:28 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Apr 12 22:06 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K Apr 12 22:06 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 22 14:29 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 22 14:29 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 13 08:03 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 162K Apr 13 08:03 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 13 03:53 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 13 03:53 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:29 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 213K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716372784122
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BART-COL-050
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-22 10:13:05] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-22 10:13:05] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-22 10:13:06] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-22 10:13:06] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-22 10:13:07] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1372 ms
[2024-05-22 10:13:07] [INFO ] Detected 3 constant HL places corresponding to 10373 PT places.
[2024-05-22 10:13:07] [INFO ] Imported 4 HL places and 7 HL transitions for a total of 22673 PT places and 7.03614756E10 transition bindings in 108 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 15 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2024-05-22 10:13:07] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 4 places and 7 transitions 26 arcs in 8 ms.
[2024-05-22 10:13:07] [INFO ] Skeletonized 2 HLPN properties in 2 ms. Removed 14 properties that had guard overlaps.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
All 16 properties of the HLPN use transition enablings in a way that makes the skeleton too coarse.
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :trainid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial detected :trainid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards detected :trainid
Applying symmetric unfolding of full symmetric sort :trainid domain size was 50
Domain [distance(41), speed(6), distance(41)] of place NewDistTable breaks symmetries in sort distance
Arc [0:1*[$db, (MOD (ADD $tsp 1) 6), $da2]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort speed
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 10619 places and 323 transitions 601 arcs in 2203 ms.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Reduced 35 identical enabling conditions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 10215 places in 4 ms
Reduce places removed 10487 places and 121 transitions.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 132 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 26 ms
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 249 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 200 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 499 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 5142 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 3670 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8906ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8930ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9471 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Support contains 132 out of 132 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2024-05-22 10:13:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-22 10:13:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 8 to 6
RANDOM walk for 1942 steps (0 resets) in 17 ms. (107 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G((X(p0)||(p0 U p1))) U (X(p0) U G(p0))))'
Support contains 130 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:13:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:13:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:13:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 4501 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 3422 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7956ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7962ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8123 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 316 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 580 steps with 1 reset in 16 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-00 finished in 8547 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)||X(F((X(X(!p0))&&F(p1)))))))'
Support contains 69 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 132 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 129 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 103 transition count 173
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 102 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 102 transition count 172
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 98 transition count 168
Applied a total of 68 rules in 50 ms. Remains 98 /132 variables (removed 34) and now considering 168/202 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-22 10:13:28] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-22 10:13:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:13:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:13:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 10:13:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 2904 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 132/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 2343 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5273ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5277ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5490 ms. Remains : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 642 reset in 614 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 645 reset in 509 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 203 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 80 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 1483 steps (0 resets) in 8 ms. (164 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 282 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 69 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 168/168 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 168/168 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:13:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:13:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:13:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 10:13:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 3139 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 132/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 2434 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5594ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5596ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5743 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 168/168 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 200 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 80 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 1942 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (242 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 271 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 643 reset in 467 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 640 reset in 453 ms.
Support contains 69 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 168/168 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 168/168 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:13:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:13:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:13:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 10:13:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 7 ms returned []
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 2913 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 132/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 2340 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5271ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5273ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5429 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 168/168 transitions.
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-02 finished in 20511 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0||F(G(!p1))))))'
Support contains 97 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 132 cols
[2024-05-22 10:13:49] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 10:13:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:13:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:13:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 334/334 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 4351 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 202/334 variables, 132/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 166/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/334 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 334/334 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 3404 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7782ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7785ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7946 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 164 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 206 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 37250 steps with 0 reset with depth 37251 and stack size 16790 in 122 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-03 finished in 8464 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((!p0||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 89 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 132 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 130 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 121 transition count 191
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 121 transition count 187
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 117 transition count 187
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 111 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 111 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 111 transition count 180
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 108 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 108 transition count 177
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 105 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 105 transition count 174
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 102 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 102 transition count 171
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 100 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 100 transition count 169
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 98 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 98 transition count 167
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 97 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 97 transition count 166
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 91 transition count 160
Applied a total of 83 rules in 38 ms. Remains 91 /132 variables (removed 41) and now considering 160/202 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 91 cols
[2024-05-22 10:13:57] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 10:13:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:13:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:13:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 10:13:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:13:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/251 variables, 91/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 251/251 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 2698 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/251 variables, 91/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 124/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 251/251 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 2122 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4838ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4840ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5036 ms. Remains : 91/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 241 reset in 1019 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 928 steps with 6 reset with depth 226 and stack size 226 in 4 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-04 finished in 6165 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(!p0)&&X(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 97 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 26 edges and 132 vertex of which 6 / 132 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 127 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 119 transition count 189
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 107 transition count 177
Applied a total of 41 rules in 23 ms. Remains 107 /132 variables (removed 25) and now considering 177/202 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 177 rows 107 cols
[2024-05-22 10:14:04] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 10:14:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:14:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:14:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 10:14:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:14:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 176/283 variables, 107/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/283 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 283/284 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3334 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 176/283 variables, 107/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 141/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/283 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 283/284 variables, and 249 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 2598 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5961ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5963ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/132 places, 177/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6143 ms. Remains : 107/132 places, 177/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 125 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p0), p0, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-07
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-07 finished in 6291 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&X(G((G(p2)||p1))))))'
Support contains 10 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 109 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 109 transition count 179
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 90 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 90 transition count 160
Applied a total of 84 rules in 13 ms. Remains 90 /132 variables (removed 42) and now considering 160/202 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 90 cols
[2024-05-22 10:14:10] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 10:14:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:14:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:14:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:14:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/250 variables, 90/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 250/250 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 2657 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/250 variables, 90/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 124/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 250/250 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 2121 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4796ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4798ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4938 ms. Remains : 90/132 places, 160/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-10 finished in 5131 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(G(!p0)))&&(G(!p0)||(p0 U !p1))))'
Support contains 69 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 129 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 129 transition count 199
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 129 /132 variables (removed 3) and now considering 199/202 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 129 cols
[2024-05-22 10:14:15] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 10:14:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:14:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:14:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 119 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 163 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:14:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 199/328 variables, 129/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 328/328 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 4523 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 199/328 variables, 129/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 163/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 328/328 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 3394 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7944ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7947ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/132 places, 199/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8114 ms. Remains : 129/132 places, 199/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[p0, p0, p0, p1, true]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-11
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 14 steps with 6 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-11 finished in 8318 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0&&(p0 U (p1||G(p0)))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 132 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 68 transition count 138
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 68 transition count 134
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 64 transition count 134
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 58 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 58 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 58 transition count 127
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 54 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 54 transition count 123
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 51 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 51 transition count 120
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 48 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 48 transition count 117
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 46 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 46 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 44 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 44 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 43 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 43 transition count 112
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 36 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 36 transition count 101
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 34 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 34 transition count 95
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 32 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 32 transition count 89
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 30 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 30 transition count 83
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 28 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 28 transition count 77
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 26 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 26 transition count 71
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 24 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 24 transition count 65
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 22 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 10 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 22 transition count 59
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 11 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 20 transition count 57
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 11 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 20 transition count 53
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 12 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 18 transition count 51
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 12 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 18 transition count 47
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 13 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 16 transition count 45
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 13 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 16 transition count 41
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 14 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 14 transition count 39
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 14 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 14 transition count 35
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 15 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 12 transition count 33
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 15 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 12 transition count 29
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 16 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 10 transition count 27
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 16 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 10 transition count 23
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 17 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 8 transition count 21
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 17 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 8 transition count 17
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 18 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 6 transition count 15
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 18 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 6 transition count 11
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 19 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 4 transition count 9
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 19 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 4 transition count 4
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 20 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 3 transition count 3
Applied a total of 328 rules in 57 ms. Remains 3 /132 variables (removed 129) and now considering 3/202 (removed 199) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 3 cols
[2024-05-22 10:14:23] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-22 10:14:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:14:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:14:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 10:14:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 2 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:14:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/6 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 6/6 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 50 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/6 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 6/6 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 32 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 85ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 86ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 3/132 places, 3/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 201 ms. Remains : 3/132 places, 3/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 117 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 56 reset in 67 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 26969 steps with 14 reset with depth 393 and stack size 181 in 25 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-12 finished in 428 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 100 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 100 transition count 170
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 73 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 73 transition count 143
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 69 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 69 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 66 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 66 transition count 136
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 63 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 63 transition count 133
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 60 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 60 transition count 130
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 57 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 57 transition count 127
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 54 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 54 transition count 124
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 52 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 52 transition count 122
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 50 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 50 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 49 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 49 transition count 119
Applied a total of 166 rules in 20 ms. Remains 49 /132 variables (removed 83) and now considering 119/202 (removed 83) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 49 cols
[2024-05-22 10:14:24] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-22 10:14:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:14:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:14:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:14:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 119/168 variables, 49/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 1295 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 119/168 variables, 49/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 83/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved in 1085 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2394ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2396ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/132 places, 119/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2509 ms. Remains : 49/132 places, 119/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 89 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-13
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 94 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-13 finished in 2614 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((G(F(p0))||(!p1&&F(p0))))))'
Support contains 68 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 202/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 132 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 129 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 103 transition count 173
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 102 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 102 transition count 172
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 98 transition count 168
Applied a total of 68 rules in 12 ms. Remains 98 /132 variables (removed 34) and now considering 168/202 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-22 10:14:26] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-22 10:14:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-22 10:14:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-22 10:14:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-22 10:14:26] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-22 10:14:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 2821 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 168/266 variables, 98/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 132/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 2300 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5137ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5139ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5298 ms. Remains : 98/132 places, 168/202 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4 reset in 233 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1631 steps with 0 reset with depth 1632 and stack size 1632 in 6 ms.
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-15 finished in 5630 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)||X(F((X(X(!p0))&&F(p1)))))))'
[2024-05-22 10:14:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-22 10:14:32] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 1 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 4 ms.
[2024-05-22 10:14:32] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 132 places, 202 transitions and 404 arcs took 7 ms.
Total runtime 86838 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN-meddly tool, MCC 2023
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Running BART-COL-050
IS_COLORED=
IS_NUPN=
LOADING PETRI NET FILE /home/mcc/execution/408/model.pnml (PNML) ...
PNML VERSION 2009, P/T NET.
COLOR CLASSES: 0
CONSTANTS: 0
PLACES: 132
TRANSITIONS: 202
COLOR VARS: 0
MEASURES: 0
LOADING TIME: [User 0.001s, Sys 0.003s]
SAVING FILE /home/mcc/execution/408/model (.net / .def) ...
EXPORT TIME: [User 0.000s, Sys 0.000s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN/Meddly.
Copyright (C) 1987-2022, University of Torino, Italy.
website: https://github.com/greatspn/SOURCES
Based on MEDDLY version 0.16.0
Copyright (C) 2009, Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.
website: http://meddly.sourceforge.net
Process ID: 1034
MODEL NAME: /home/mcc/execution/408/model
132 places, 202 transitions.
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Building monolithic NSF...
FORMULA BART-COL-050-LTLFireability-02 CANNOT_COMPUTE
Ok.
EXITCODE: 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BK_STOP 1716373483382
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BART-COL-050"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is BART-COL-050, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r025-smll-171620166600428"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BART-COL-050.tgz
mv BART-COL-050 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;