Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r004-smll-171620117600009.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ASLink-PT-01a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r004-smll-171620117600009
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 684K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 22 14:26 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Apr 22 14:26 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 19 07:11 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 19 17:45 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 11 18:09 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 130K Apr 11 18:09 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K Apr 11 18:08 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K Apr 11 18:08 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:26 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 22 14:26 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 201K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716211514962

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ASLink-PT-01a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-20 13:25:17] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-20 13:25:17] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-20 13:25:18] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 334 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:18] [INFO ] Transformed 431 places.
[2024-05-20 13:25:18] [INFO ] Transformed 735 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:25:18] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-20 13:25:18] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 431 places and 735 transitions and 2801 arcs in 604 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 53 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 7 transitions.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 86 out of 431 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 431/431 places, 728/728 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 places
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 426 transition count 728
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 422 transition count 711
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 421 transition count 711
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 421 transition count 710
Applied a total of 15 rules in 176 ms. Remains 421 /431 variables (removed 10) and now considering 710/728 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 710 rows 421 cols
[2024-05-20 13:25:18] [INFO ] Computed 74 invariants in 79 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1367 ms returned [1, 20, 23, 33, 51, 69, 198, 203, 216, 221, 222, 223, 257, 259, 262, 280, 282, 283, 301, 309, 317, 323, 329, 335, 341, 349, 355, 361, 369]
Discarding 29 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 1437 ms to find 29 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 392/431 places, 710/728 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 381 transition count 699
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 381 transition count 699
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 375 transition count 693
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 375 transition count 693
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 372 transition count 690
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 372 transition count 690
Applied a total of 40 rules in 87 ms. Remains 372 /392 variables (removed 20) and now considering 690/710 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 690 rows 372 cols
[2024-05-20 13:25:20] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 23 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 496 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:25:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:25:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 988 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1486 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 372/431 places, 690/728 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 3226 ms. Remains : 372/431 places, 690/728 transitions.
Support contains 86 out of 372 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-20 13:25:22] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-20 13:25:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 183 ms
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-20 13:25:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
Support contains 79 out of 372 places (down from 86) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (773 resets) in 2431 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 6/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (283 resets) in 616 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (281 resets) in 462 ms. (86 steps per ms) remains 4/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (291 resets) in 243 ms. (163 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (279 resets) in 115 ms. (344 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2024-05-20 13:25:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 173/184 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 18/202 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 170/372 variables, 32/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 690/1062 variables, 372/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1062 variables, 0/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/1062 variables, 0/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1062/1062 variables, and 417 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 965 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 372/372 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 173/184 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 18/202 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 170/372 variables, 32/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-05-20 13:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 444 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-20 13:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 150 places in 433 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-20 13:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 152 places in 381 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 3/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 690/1062 variables, 372/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1062 variables, 2/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1062 variables, 0/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/1062 variables, 0/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1062/1062 variables, and 422 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved in 2378 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 372/372 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/4 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 3432ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 550 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 372 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 371 transition count 625
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 306 transition count 624
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 305 transition count 624
Performed 31 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 31 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 305 transition count 593
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 264 transition count 593
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 263 transition count 592
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 262 transition count 592
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 262 transition count 589
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 4 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 259 transition count 589
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 253 transition count 576
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 253 transition count 576
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 252 transition count 572
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 249 transition count 572
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 249 transition count 571
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 248 transition count 571
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 246 transition count 562
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 246 transition count 562
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 246 transition count 561
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 245 transition count 561
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 243 transition count 552
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 243 transition count 552
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 247 place count 242 transition count 544
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 242 transition count 544
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 249 place count 241 transition count 536
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 241 transition count 536
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 251 place count 240 transition count 528
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 240 transition count 528
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 253 place count 239 transition count 520
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 239 transition count 520
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 238 transition count 512
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 238 transition count 512
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 257 place count 237 transition count 504
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 237 transition count 504
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 236 transition count 496
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 236 transition count 496
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 261 place count 235 transition count 488
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 235 transition count 488
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 263 place count 234 transition count 480
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 234 transition count 480
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 233 transition count 472
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 233 transition count 472
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 267 place count 232 transition count 464
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 232 transition count 464
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 231 transition count 456
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 231 transition count 456
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 230 transition count 448
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 230 transition count 448
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 202 transition count 420
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 329 place count 201 transition count 419
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 201 transition count 419
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 331 place count 200 transition count 418
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 200 transition count 418
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 200 transition count 417
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 199 transition count 417
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 8 times.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 199 transition count 409
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 10 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 190 transition count 409
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 11 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 190 transition count 408
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 11 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 357 place count 190 transition count 408
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 11 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 189 transition count 407
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 11 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 360 place count 187 transition count 407
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 12 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 360 place count 187 transition count 400
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 12 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 174 transition count 400
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 12 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 384 place count 170 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 12 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 170 transition count 396
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 12 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 170 transition count 392
Applied a total of 392 rules in 481 ms. Remains 170 /372 variables (removed 202) and now considering 392/690 (removed 298) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 481 ms. Remains : 170/372 places, 392/690 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1053 resets) in 295 ms. (135 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (501 resets) in 241 ms. (165 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (558 resets) in 150 ms. (264 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 245151 steps, run visited all 2 properties in 923 ms. (steps per millisecond=265 )
Probabilistic random walk after 245151 steps, saw 95404 distinct states, run finished after 928 ms. (steps per millisecond=264 ) properties seen :2
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2024-05-20 13:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
Support contains 65 out of 372 places (down from 72) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 371 transition count 690
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 364 transition count 676
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 364 transition count 676
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 364 transition count 675
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 359 transition count 663
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 359 transition count 663
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 356 transition count 653
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 356 transition count 653
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 354 transition count 644
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 354 transition count 644
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 352 transition count 635
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 352 transition count 635
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 350 transition count 626
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 350 transition count 626
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 348 transition count 617
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 348 transition count 617
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 347 transition count 609
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 347 transition count 609
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 346 transition count 601
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 346 transition count 601
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 345 transition count 593
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 345 transition count 593
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 344 transition count 585
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 344 transition count 585
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 343 transition count 577
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 343 transition count 577
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 342 transition count 569
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 342 transition count 569
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 341 transition count 561
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 341 transition count 561
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 340 transition count 553
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 340 transition count 553
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 339 transition count 545
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 339 transition count 545
Applied a total of 66 rules in 90 ms. Remains 339 /372 variables (removed 33) and now considering 545/690 (removed 145) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 545 rows 339 cols
[2024-05-20 13:25:29] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 15 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 382 ms returned [18, 248]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 383 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 337/372 places, 545/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 337 /337 variables (removed 0) and now considering 545/545 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 488 ms. Remains : 337/372 places, 545/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:25:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 545 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:25:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11382844720182012738.gal : 25 ms
[2024-05-20 13:25:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4585156887315670847.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11382844720182012738.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4585156887315670847.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59357e+08,6.31312,138724,2,29339,5,406634,6,0,1895,452729,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-20 13:26:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-20 13:26:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-20 13:26:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7803208941400538069.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7803208941400538069.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7803208941400538069.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7803208941400538069.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7803208941400538069.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-20 13:26:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-20 13:26:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-20 13:26:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 814 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:26:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 129 ms
[2024-05-20 13:26:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 24 ms.
[2024-05-20 13:26:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5019039708692763256.gal : 17 ms
[2024-05-20 13:26:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4514768605586009786.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5019039708692763256.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4514768605586009786.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59357e+08,1.7223,45832,1911,249,79530,2669,1103,136626,139,17717,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((i7.u88.p304==1) U EG(AX((i0.i0.u8.p31==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((i7.u88.p304==1) U EG(!(EX(!((i0.i0.u8.p31==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t10, t276, t278, t465, t518, i0.i1.t5, i4.i0.u37.t64, i4.i2.u46.t54, i4.i3.u53.t4...396
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 370 transition count 624
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 303 transition count 623
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 302 transition count 622
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 301 transition count 622
Performed 38 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 38 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 301 transition count 584
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 12 places
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 251 transition count 584
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 245 transition count 573
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 234 transition count 573
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 234 transition count 569
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 230 transition count 569
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 220 transition count 552
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 220 transition count 552
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 6 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 219 transition count 544
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 216 transition count 544
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 8 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 216 transition count 543
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 215 transition count 543
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 297 place count 213 transition count 534
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 213 transition count 534
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 213 transition count 533
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 212 transition count 533
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 210 transition count 524
Iterating global reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 210 transition count 524
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 306 place count 209 transition count 516
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 209 transition count 516
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 308 place count 208 transition count 508
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 208 transition count 508
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 310 place count 207 transition count 500
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 207 transition count 500
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 312 place count 206 transition count 492
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 206 transition count 492
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 314 place count 205 transition count 484
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 205 transition count 484
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 316 place count 204 transition count 476
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 204 transition count 476
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 318 place count 203 transition count 468
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 203 transition count 468
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 320 place count 202 transition count 460
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 202 transition count 460
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 322 place count 201 transition count 452
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 201 transition count 452
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 324 place count 200 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 200 transition count 444
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 326 place count 199 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 199 transition count 436
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 328 place count 198 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 198 transition count 428
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 330 place count 197 transition count 420
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 197 transition count 420
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 182 transition count 405
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 362 place count 181 transition count 404
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 363 place count 181 transition count 404
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 364 place count 180 transition count 403
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 180 transition count 403
Applied a total of 365 rules in 252 ms. Remains 180 /372 variables (removed 192) and now considering 403/690 (removed 287) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 403 rows 180 cols
[2024-05-20 13:26:31] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 336 ms returned [17, 74, 95, 102, 108, 110, 177]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 348 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 173/372 places, 403/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 173 transition count 402
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 172 transition count 402
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 172 transition count 401
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 171 transition count 401
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 169 transition count 399
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 169 transition count 399
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 167 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 167 transition count 397
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 166 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 166 transition count 396
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 163 transition count 393
Applied a total of 20 rules in 46 ms. Remains 163 /173 variables (removed 10) and now considering 393/403 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 393 rows 163 cols
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 241 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 404 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 649 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 163/372 places, 393/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1296 ms. Remains : 163/372 places, 393/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 393 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1557499632716021978.gal : 7 ms
[2024-05-20 13:26:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8679261127979177623.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1557499632716021978.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8679261127979177623.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,352188,1.73507,42952,2,7962,5,119775,6,0,1048,136033,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p34==0)||(p103==1)) U AF((p109==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((p109==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!((p109==1))))) U (!(((p34==0)||(p103==1))) * !(!(EG(!((p1...179
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t11, t303, t306, t337, t338, t345, t351, t352, t356, t357, t358, t361, t362, t370, t380, t381...325
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-20 13:27:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-20 13:27:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-20 13:27:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9880594895796099237.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9880594895796099237.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9880594895796099237.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9880594895796099237.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9880594895796099237.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-20 13:27:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-20 13:27:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-20 13:27:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 793 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:27:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2024-05-20 13:27:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2024-05-20 13:27:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17559742218096528747.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:27:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1288337204073149135.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17559742218096528747.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1288337204073149135.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,352188,13.5806,258244,1008,499,296342,25048,716,1.23676e+06,155,188292,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i2.i1.u9.p34==0)||(i1.u25.p103==1)) U AF((i1.u26.p109==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((i1.u26.p109==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!((i1.u26.p109==1))))) U (!(((i2.i1.u9.p34==0)||(i1...216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t303, t306, t351, t370, t392, i1.t345, i1.u24.t337, i1.u24.t338, i1.u24.t380, i1.u24.t381, i1...421
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 371 transition count 690
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 363 transition count 675
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 363 transition count 675
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 363 transition count 674
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 358 transition count 662
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 358 transition count 662
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 355 transition count 652
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 355 transition count 652
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 353 transition count 643
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 353 transition count 643
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 351 transition count 634
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 351 transition count 634
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 350 transition count 626
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 350 transition count 626
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 349 transition count 618
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 349 transition count 618
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 348 transition count 610
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 348 transition count 610
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 347 transition count 602
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 347 transition count 602
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 346 transition count 594
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 346 transition count 594
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 345 transition count 586
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 345 transition count 586
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 344 transition count 578
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 344 transition count 578
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 343 transition count 570
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 343 transition count 570
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 342 transition count 562
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 342 transition count 562
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 341 transition count 554
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 341 transition count 554
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 340 transition count 546
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 340 transition count 546
Applied a total of 64 rules in 134 ms. Remains 340 /372 variables (removed 32) and now considering 546/690 (removed 144) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 546 rows 340 cols
[2024-05-20 13:27:33] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 13 ms
[2024-05-20 13:27:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 271 ms returned [18, 248]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 273 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 338/372 places, 546/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 338 /338 variables (removed 0) and now considering 546/546 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 418 ms. Remains : 338/372 places, 546/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:27:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-20 13:27:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-20 13:27:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 546 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:27:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-20 13:27:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-20 13:27:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3313923252334085257.gal : 7 ms
[2024-05-20 13:27:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2624231740732819861.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3313923252334085257.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2624231740732819861.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59758e+08,7.13248,146996,2,29140,5,424076,6,0,1900,477072,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-20 13:28:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-20 13:28:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-20 13:28:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15991740983393331755.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15991740983393331755.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15991740983393331755.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15991740983393331755.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15991740983393331755.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-20 13:28:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-20 13:28:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-20 13:28:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 802 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2024-05-20 13:28:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 56 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2024-05-20 13:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16727965474695915284.gal : 7 ms
[2024-05-20 13:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality189403081229862525.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16727965474695915284.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality189403081229862525.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59758e+08,1.72717,52512,1554,270,84082,11187,1139,167650,157,69557,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EX((i3.i0.u40.p130==1)) + (i7.i1.u92.p361==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EX((i3.i0.u40.p130==1)) + (i7.i1.u92.p361==0)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t277, t278, t466, t519, i0.i2.t5, i3.i1.u37.t65, i3.i2.u46.t55, i3.i3.u53.t45, i4...420
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 371 transition count 690
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 363 transition count 675
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 363 transition count 675
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 363 transition count 674
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 359 transition count 663
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 359 transition count 663
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 356 transition count 653
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 356 transition count 653
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 354 transition count 644
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 354 transition count 644
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 353 transition count 636
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 353 transition count 636
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 352 transition count 628
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 352 transition count 628
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 351 transition count 620
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 351 transition count 620
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 350 transition count 612
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 350 transition count 612
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 349 transition count 604
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 349 transition count 604
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 348 transition count 596
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 348 transition count 596
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 347 transition count 588
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 347 transition count 588
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 346 transition count 580
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 346 transition count 580
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 345 transition count 572
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 345 transition count 572
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 344 transition count 564
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 344 transition count 564
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 343 transition count 556
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 343 transition count 556
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 342 transition count 548
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 342 transition count 548
Applied a total of 60 rules in 152 ms. Remains 342 /372 variables (removed 30) and now considering 548/690 (removed 142) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 548 rows 342 cols
[2024-05-20 13:28:34] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-20 13:28:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 400 ms returned [18, 248]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 412 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 340/372 places, 548/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 340 /340 variables (removed 0) and now considering 548/548 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 574 ms. Remains : 340/372 places, 548/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-20 13:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-20 13:28:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 548 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-20 13:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-20 13:28:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6122840133727176315.gal : 9 ms
[2024-05-20 13:28:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12419422365655991029.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6122840133727176315.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12419422365655991029.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.6587e+08,6.46847,146584,2,28931,5,423537,6,0,1910,476621,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-20 13:29:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-20 13:29:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-20 13:29:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7182627772970826983.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7182627772970826983.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7182627772970826983.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7182627772970826983.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7182627772970826983.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-20 13:29:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-20 13:29:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-20 13:29:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 831 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:29:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2024-05-20 13:29:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 34 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2024-05-20 13:29:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8360700244870824564.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-20 13:29:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3792407223934689089.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8360700244870824564.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3792407223934689089.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.6587e+08,2.28455,57420,1919,270,94114,3070,1049,227058,159,21563,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((i7.u100.p362==0) U !(AX((AG((i3.i1.i1.u89.p300==1)) + !(E((i8.u104.p388==0) U (i6.u66.p57==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((i3.i1.i1.u89.p300==1)))) + !(E((i8.u104.p388==0) U (i6.u66.p57==1))))))...409
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t278, t279, t468, t521, i1.t5, i4.u39.t66, i4.u48.t56, i4.u55.t46, i5.t4, i5.t0, ...376
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 371 transition count 690
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 364 transition count 676
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 364 transition count 676
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 364 transition count 675
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 359 transition count 663
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 359 transition count 663
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 357 transition count 661
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 357 transition count 661
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 356 transition count 660
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 356 transition count 660
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 355 transition count 659
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 355 transition count 659
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 354 transition count 658
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 354 transition count 658
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 353 transition count 657
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 353 transition count 657
Applied a total of 38 rules in 39 ms. Remains 353 /372 variables (removed 19) and now considering 657/690 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 657 rows 353 cols
[2024-05-20 13:29:35] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-20 13:29:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 385 ms returned [18]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 391 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 352/372 places, 657/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 352 /352 variables (removed 0) and now considering 657/657 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 437 ms. Remains : 352/372 places, 657/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:29:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-20 13:29:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-20 13:29:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 657 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:29:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-20 13:29:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-20 13:29:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11736896390323572169.gal : 7 ms
[2024-05-20 13:29:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14663591353090475864.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11736896390323572169.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14663591353090475864.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58935e+08,8.32282,166076,2,35547,5,453978,6,0,2067,522311,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-20 13:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-20 13:30:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-20 13:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10154240613090338236.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10154240613090338236.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10154240613090338236.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10154240613090338236.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10154240613090338236.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-20 13:30:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-20 13:30:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-20 13:30:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1109 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2024-05-20 13:30:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 93 labels/synchronizations in 18 ms.
[2024-05-20 13:30:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14717710700615987456.gal : 10 ms
[2024-05-20 13:30:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7385484230935475193.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14717710700615987456.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7385484230935475193.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58935e+08,2.73278,67924,1896,314,113004,9625,1331,207726,168,58758,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A(!((AF(((i6.i1.u82.p273==1)&&((i2.u25.p89==0)||(i8.i4.u100.p332==1)))) * (((EX(((i7.u107.p390==0)||(i3.i3.u53.p171==1))) * (i0.i1.u33....431
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((i6.i1.u84.p279==1) + E(!((E(TRUE U (i3.i3.u53.p170==0)) * ((i1.i1.u16.p48==0)||(i6.i1.u86.p2...981
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t275, t276, t556, t577, t627, i1.t495, i1.t383, i3.i0.u38.t64, i3.i2.u46.t54, i3....436
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 371 transition count 690
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 363 transition count 675
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 363 transition count 675
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 363 transition count 674
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 358 transition count 662
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 358 transition count 662
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 356 transition count 660
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 356 transition count 660
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 355 transition count 659
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 355 transition count 659
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 354 transition count 658
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 354 transition count 658
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 353 transition count 657
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 353 transition count 657
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 352 transition count 656
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 352 transition count 656
Applied a total of 40 rules in 51 ms. Remains 352 /372 variables (removed 20) and now considering 656/690 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 656 rows 352 cols
[2024-05-20 13:30:36] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:30:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 422 ms returned [18, 262]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 433 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 350/372 places, 656/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 350 /350 variables (removed 0) and now considering 656/656 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 489 ms. Remains : 350/372 places, 656/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-20 13:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-20 13:30:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 656 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2024-05-20 13:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-20 13:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4263761113223748872.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5782253874203087128.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4263761113223748872.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5782253874203087128.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58935e+08,9.03211,174848,2,37107,5,490209,6,0,2058,549096,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-20 13:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-20 13:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15860325068371638842.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15860325068371638842.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15860325068371638842.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15860325068371638842.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15860325068371638842.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-20 13:31:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-20 13:31:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-20 13:31:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1122 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-20 13:31:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4276929591055909080.gal : 7 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9620024373434837629.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4276929591055909080.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9620024373434837629.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58935e+08,1.52683,37548,1750,288,63249,3608,1280,109441,157,16824,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EG((EX(((i2.u76.p245==0)||(i3.i1.u30.p111==1))) * AG((i7.i1.u106.p381==0)))) + ((AG(((i2.u70.p233==0)||(i8.u113.p403==1))) * EX((i7.i...228
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(EG((EX(((i2.u76.p245==0)||(i3.i1.u30.p111==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((i7.i1.u106.p381==0)))))))...542
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t10, t275, t276, t277, t576, t626, i1.i2.t5, i2.t495, i2.t383, i4.i0.u37.t64, i4....440
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,22.0845,514332,1,0,1.07709e+06,5377,10023,1.63635e+06,779,29109,1944214
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 67 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 67 transitions
Performed 67 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 67
Iterating post reduction 0 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 370 transition count 622
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 301 transition count 621
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 300 transition count 620
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 299 transition count 620
Performed 39 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 39 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 299 transition count 581
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 12 places
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 248 transition count 581
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 242 transition count 570
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 231 transition count 570
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 231 transition count 566
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 227 transition count 566
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 217 transition count 549
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 217 transition count 549
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 6 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 216 transition count 541
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 213 transition count 541
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 8 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 213 transition count 540
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 212 transition count 540
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 210 transition count 531
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 210 transition count 531
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 210 transition count 530
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 209 transition count 530
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 309 place count 207 transition count 521
Iterating global reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 207 transition count 521
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 312 place count 206 transition count 513
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 206 transition count 513
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 314 place count 205 transition count 505
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 205 transition count 505
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 316 place count 204 transition count 497
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 204 transition count 497
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 318 place count 203 transition count 489
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 203 transition count 489
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 320 place count 202 transition count 481
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 202 transition count 481
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 322 place count 201 transition count 473
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 201 transition count 473
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 324 place count 200 transition count 465
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 200 transition count 465
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 326 place count 199 transition count 457
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 199 transition count 457
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 328 place count 198 transition count 449
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 198 transition count 449
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 330 place count 197 transition count 441
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 197 transition count 441
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 332 place count 196 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 196 transition count 433
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 334 place count 195 transition count 425
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 195 transition count 425
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 336 place count 194 transition count 417
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 194 transition count 417
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 179 transition count 402
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 368 place count 178 transition count 401
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 369 place count 178 transition count 401
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 370 place count 177 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 177 transition count 400
Applied a total of 371 rules in 116 ms. Remains 177 /372 variables (removed 195) and now considering 400/690 (removed 290) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 177 cols
[2024-05-20 13:31:29] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 235 ms returned [17, 73, 92, 99, 105, 107, 174]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 239 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 170/372 places, 400/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 170 transition count 399
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 169 transition count 399
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 169 transition count 398
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 168 transition count 398
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 166 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 166 transition count 396
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 164 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 164 transition count 394
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 163 transition count 393
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 163 transition count 393
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 160 transition count 390
Applied a total of 20 rules in 35 ms. Remains 160 /170 variables (removed 10) and now considering 390/400 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 390 rows 160 cols
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 202 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 403 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 616 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 160/372 places, 390/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1007 ms. Remains : 160/372 places, 390/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 390 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 869 steps (29 resets) in 10 ms. (79 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10677724878458291771.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8252955353241553203.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10677724878458291771.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8252955353241553203.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 68 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 68 transitions
Performed 68 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 68
Iterating post reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 370 transition count 621
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 300 transition count 620
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 299 transition count 620
Performed 39 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 39 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 299 transition count 581
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 12 places
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 248 transition count 581
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 242 transition count 570
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 231 transition count 570
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 231 transition count 566
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 227 transition count 566
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 276 place count 218 transition count 550
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 218 transition count 550
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 218 transition count 545
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 217 transition count 545
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 217 transition count 544
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 216 transition count 544
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 295 place count 214 transition count 535
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 214 transition count 535
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 214 transition count 534
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 213 transition count 534
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 301 place count 211 transition count 525
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 211 transition count 525
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 304 place count 210 transition count 517
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 210 transition count 517
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 306 place count 209 transition count 509
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 209 transition count 509
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 308 place count 208 transition count 501
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 208 transition count 501
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 310 place count 207 transition count 493
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 207 transition count 493
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 312 place count 206 transition count 485
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 206 transition count 485
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 314 place count 205 transition count 477
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 205 transition count 477
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 316 place count 204 transition count 469
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 204 transition count 469
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 318 place count 203 transition count 461
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 203 transition count 461
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 320 place count 202 transition count 453
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 202 transition count 453
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 322 place count 201 transition count 445
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 201 transition count 445
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 324 place count 200 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 200 transition count 437
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 326 place count 199 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 199 transition count 429
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 328 place count 198 transition count 421
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 198 transition count 421
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 183 transition count 406
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 360 place count 182 transition count 405
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 182 transition count 405
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 362 place count 181 transition count 404
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 363 place count 181 transition count 404
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 181 transition count 404
Applied a total of 364 rules in 168 ms. Remains 181 /372 variables (removed 191) and now considering 404/690 (removed 286) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 404 rows 181 cols
[2024-05-20 13:31:30] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 237 ms returned [17, 73, 92, 99, 105, 107, 174, 180]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 240 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 173/372 places, 404/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 173 transition count 402
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 171 transition count 402
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 171 transition count 401
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 170 transition count 401
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 168 transition count 399
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 168 transition count 399
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 166 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 166 transition count 397
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 165 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 165 transition count 396
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 162 transition count 393
Applied a total of 22 rules in 32 ms. Remains 162 /173 variables (removed 11) and now considering 393/404 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 393 rows 162 cols
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 198 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 391 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 594 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 162/372 places, 393/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1034 ms. Remains : 162/372 places, 393/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 393 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6552757904831550272.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10555677315237096139.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6552757904831550272.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10555677315237096139.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,316040,1.63201,34768,2,6660,5,97236,6,0,1044,105063,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p425==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p425==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 391/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,4.6887,88476,1,0,8,269308,19,4,6560,171243,8
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 371 transition count 624
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 304 transition count 623
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 303 transition count 623
Performed 38 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 38 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 303 transition count 585
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 13 places
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 89 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 252 transition count 585
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 247 transition count 574
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 236 transition count 574
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 236 transition count 570
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 232 transition count 570
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 268 place count 222 transition count 553
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 222 transition count 553
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 221 transition count 545
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 218 transition count 545
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 218 transition count 544
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 217 transition count 544
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 294 place count 215 transition count 535
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 215 transition count 535
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 215 transition count 534
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 214 transition count 534
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 300 place count 212 transition count 525
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 212 transition count 525
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 211 transition count 517
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 211 transition count 517
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 305 place count 210 transition count 509
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 210 transition count 509
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 307 place count 209 transition count 501
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 209 transition count 501
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 309 place count 208 transition count 493
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 208 transition count 493
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 311 place count 207 transition count 485
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 207 transition count 485
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 313 place count 206 transition count 477
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 314 place count 206 transition count 477
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 315 place count 205 transition count 469
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 205 transition count 469
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 317 place count 204 transition count 461
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 204 transition count 461
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 319 place count 203 transition count 453
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 203 transition count 453
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 321 place count 202 transition count 445
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 322 place count 202 transition count 445
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 323 place count 201 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 201 transition count 437
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 325 place count 200 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 200 transition count 429
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 327 place count 199 transition count 421
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 199 transition count 421
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 185 transition count 407
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 357 place count 184 transition count 406
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 184 transition count 406
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 359 place count 183 transition count 405
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 360 place count 183 transition count 405
Applied a total of 360 rules in 106 ms. Remains 183 /372 variables (removed 189) and now considering 405/690 (removed 285) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 405 rows 183 cols
[2024-05-20 13:31:36] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 213 ms returned [17, 73, 93, 100, 106, 111, 180]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 215 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 176/372 places, 405/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 176 transition count 404
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 175 transition count 404
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 175 transition count 403
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 174 transition count 403
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 173 transition count 402
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 173 transition count 402
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 172 transition count 401
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 172 transition count 401
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 169 transition count 398
Applied a total of 14 rules in 22 ms. Remains 169 /176 variables (removed 7) and now considering 398/405 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 398 rows 169 cols
[2024-05-20 13:31:36] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:31:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:31:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 542 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 725 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 169/372 places, 398/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1071 ms. Remains : 169/372 places, 398/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:31:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 398 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:31:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12486993762580944705.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7647122811633372648.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12486993762580944705.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7647122811633372648.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,442281,2.07895,53732,2,8830,5,153050,6,0,1077,180808,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((p221!=1) U AG(EF(((p122==0)||(p342==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((p122==0)||(p342==1)))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((p122==0)||...254
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t14, t306, t310, t340, t344, t356, t357, t358, t359, t362, t363, t364, t367, t368, t376, ...329
(forward)formula 0,1,8.8548,190456,1,0,310,530582,602,167,9745,370395,587
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 371 transition count 690
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 363 transition count 675
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 363 transition count 675
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 363 transition count 674
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 358 transition count 662
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 358 transition count 662
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 355 transition count 652
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 355 transition count 652
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 353 transition count 643
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 353 transition count 643
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 351 transition count 634
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 351 transition count 634
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 349 transition count 625
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 349 transition count 625
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 347 transition count 616
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 347 transition count 616
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 346 transition count 608
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 346 transition count 608
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 345 transition count 600
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 345 transition count 600
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 344 transition count 592
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 344 transition count 592
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 343 transition count 584
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 343 transition count 584
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 342 transition count 576
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 342 transition count 576
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 341 transition count 568
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 341 transition count 568
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 340 transition count 560
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 340 transition count 560
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 339 transition count 552
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 339 transition count 552
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 338 transition count 544
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 338 transition count 544
Applied a total of 68 rules in 78 ms. Remains 338 /372 variables (removed 34) and now considering 544/690 (removed 146) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 544 rows 338 cols
[2024-05-20 13:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 275 ms returned [248]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 279 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 337/372 places, 544/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 337 /337 variables (removed 0) and now considering 544/544 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 361 ms. Remains : 337/372 places, 544/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 544 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1547924713043138049.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:31:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1789156533659574607.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1547924713043138049.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1789156533659574607.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58935e+08,6.87634,153684,2,30405,5,433984,6,0,1894,492043,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-20 13:32:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-20 13:32:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-20 13:32:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13895417411628102116.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13895417411628102116.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13895417411628102116.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13895417411628102116.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13895417411628102116.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-20 13:32:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-20 13:32:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-20 13:32:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 807 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:32:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2024-05-20 13:32:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 52 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-20 13:32:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4051726241558159341.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-20 13:32:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12582470831618430243.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4051726241558159341.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12582470831618430243.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58935e+08,2.04567,47172,1553,290,69716,8823,1097,161869,153,59838,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AX(AX(AF(((i0.i0.u7.p20!=0)&&(i2.i0.u58.p185!=1)))))) * EF((i2.i0.u30.p98==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((i0.i0.u7.p20!=0)&&(i2.i0.u58.p185!=1)))))))))))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(T...192
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t10, t276, t277, t464, t517, i0.i2.t5, i2.t4, i2.i0.t0, i3.i0.u39.t64, i3.i2.u48....388
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 371 transition count 690
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 364 transition count 676
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 364 transition count 676
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 364 transition count 675
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 360 transition count 664
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 360 transition count 664
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 358 transition count 655
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 358 transition count 655
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 357 transition count 647
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 357 transition count 647
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 356 transition count 639
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 356 transition count 639
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 355 transition count 631
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 355 transition count 631
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 354 transition count 623
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 354 transition count 623
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 353 transition count 615
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 353 transition count 615
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 352 transition count 607
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 352 transition count 607
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 351 transition count 599
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 351 transition count 599
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 350 transition count 591
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 350 transition count 591
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 349 transition count 583
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 349 transition count 583
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 348 transition count 575
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 348 transition count 575
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 347 transition count 567
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 347 transition count 567
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 346 transition count 559
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 346 transition count 559
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 345 transition count 551
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 345 transition count 551
Applied a total of 54 rules in 68 ms. Remains 345 /372 variables (removed 27) and now considering 551/690 (removed 139) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 551 rows 345 cols
[2024-05-20 13:32:47] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-05-20 13:32:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 330 ms returned [18, 248]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 331 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 343/372 places, 551/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 343 /343 variables (removed 0) and now considering 551/551 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 403 ms. Remains : 343/372 places, 551/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:32:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-20 13:32:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-20 13:32:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 551 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:32:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-20 13:32:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-20 13:32:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality730145453344471085.gal : 9 ms
[2024-05-20 13:32:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3473123769799944510.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality730145453344471085.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3473123769799944510.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.71982e+08,7.72128,165092,2,29117,5,477183,6,0,1925,544300,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-20 13:33:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-20 13:33:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-20 13:33:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11266776281054793146.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11266776281054793146.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11266776281054793146.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11266776281054793146.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11266776281054793146.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-20 13:33:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-20 13:33:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-20 13:33:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 809 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:33:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2024-05-20 13:33:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 27 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2024-05-20 13:33:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8275988253392940585.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-20 13:33:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17118831889625733583.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8275988253392940585.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17118831889625733583.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.71982e+08,2.65713,74904,1873,457,103082,30747,1066,298512,182,133259,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((!(E(((EX((i1.i0.u10.p27==0)) * ((i5.u62.p58==0)||(i8.u104.p395==1))) * (i0.u21.p77==0)) U !((((i7.i1.u93.p321==0)||(i7.i0.u99.p369==...224
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!((!(E(((EX((i1.i0.u10.p27==0)) * ((i5.u62.p58==0)||(i8.u104.p395==1))) * (i0.u21.p77==0)) U !((((i7...276
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t12, t279, t281, t471, t524, i1.i2.t5, i2.t4, i2.i0.t0, i4.i0.u38.t66, i4.i1.u46....410
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 371 transition count 690
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 363 transition count 675
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 363 transition count 675
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 363 transition count 674
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 359 transition count 670
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 359 transition count 670
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 357 transition count 668
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 357 transition count 668
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 356 transition count 667
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 356 transition count 667
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 355 transition count 666
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 355 transition count 666
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 354 transition count 665
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 354 transition count 665
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 353 transition count 664
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 353 transition count 664
Applied a total of 38 rules in 35 ms. Remains 353 /372 variables (removed 19) and now considering 664/690 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 664 rows 353 cols
[2024-05-20 13:33:48] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:33:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 329 ms returned [18, 263]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 343 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 351/372 places, 664/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 351 /351 variables (removed 0) and now considering 664/664 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 383 ms. Remains : 351/372 places, 664/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-20 13:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-20 13:33:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 664 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-20 13:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-20 13:33:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2648562866192808338.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:33:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5005840681890999208.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2648562866192808338.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5005840681890999208.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58935e+08,7.35849,165820,2,35833,5,453182,6,0,2070,501829,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-20 13:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-20 13:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12509497241599596354.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12509497241599596354.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12509497241599596354.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12509497241599596354.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12509497241599596354.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-20 13:34:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-20 13:34:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-20 13:34:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1129 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:34:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-20 13:34:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1867432273174762207.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15078551036938717849.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1867432273174762207.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15078551036938717849.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58935e+08,1.95482,51512,1930,449,84585,10390,1200,160159,177,52666,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EG(E(A(((i3.i1.u31.p107==0)||(i7.u86.p275==1)) U ((i0.u5.p16==0)||(i2.u15.p44==1))) U ((i2.u76.p249==0)||(i2.u79.p257==1)))) * AF((i2...171
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EG(E(!((E(!(((i0.u5.p16==0)||(i2.u15.p44==1))) U (!(((i3.i1.u31.p107==0)||(i7.u86.p275==1))) * !...337
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t275, t277, t584, t637, i1.i2.t5, i2.t510, i2.t390, i4.i1.u37.t64, i4.i2.u46.t54,...433
(forward)formula 0,1,14.0904,379664,1,0,702463,19591,8799,1.58273e+06,979,88443,1453178
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 370 transition count 625
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 304 transition count 624
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 303 transition count 624
Performed 39 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 39 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 303 transition count 585
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 12 places
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 252 transition count 585
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 247 transition count 576
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 238 transition count 575
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 237 transition count 575
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 237 transition count 571
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 233 transition count 571
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 224 transition count 555
Iterating global reduction 6 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 224 transition count 555
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 223 transition count 548
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 220 transition count 548
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 8 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 220 transition count 547
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 219 transition count 547
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 289 place count 217 transition count 538
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 217 transition count 538
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 217 transition count 537
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 216 transition count 537
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 295 place count 214 transition count 528
Iterating global reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 214 transition count 528
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 298 place count 213 transition count 520
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 213 transition count 520
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 300 place count 212 transition count 512
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 212 transition count 512
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 302 place count 211 transition count 504
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 211 transition count 504
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 197 transition count 490
Applied a total of 331 rules in 56 ms. Remains 197 /372 variables (removed 175) and now considering 490/690 (removed 200) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 490 rows 197 cols
[2024-05-20 13:34:33] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 214 ms returned [17, 73, 92, 99, 105, 112, 194]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 233 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 190/372 places, 490/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 190 transition count 489
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 189 transition count 489
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 189 transition count 488
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 188 transition count 488
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 186 transition count 486
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 486
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 184 transition count 484
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 184 transition count 484
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 183 transition count 483
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 183 transition count 483
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 180 transition count 480
Applied a total of 20 rules in 21 ms. Remains 180 /190 variables (removed 10) and now considering 480/490 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 480 rows 180 cols
[2024-05-20 13:34:33] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 183 ms returned []
[2024-05-20 13:34:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-20 13:34:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 444 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 644 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 180/372 places, 480/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 955 ms. Remains : 180/372 places, 480/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:34:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 480 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:34:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5297785085092150577.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality844219230098470364.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5297785085092150577.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality844219230098470364.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,415606,3.01028,70800,2,11700,5,187626,6,0,1203,215107,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(E(((p216==0)||((p194==1)&&(p392==1))) U EF((p324==1)))) + AG((((p100==0)||(p191==1))&&((p57==0)||(p254==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((p216==0)||((p194==1)&&(p392==1))) U E(TRUE U (p324==1)))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TR...236
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t14, t253, t333, t387, t391, t421, t422, t436, t437, t438, t441, t442, t443, t445, t4...345
(forward)formula 0,1,15.7629,365016,1,0,393,1.31958e+06,691,211,11228,835773,765
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 372/372 places, 690/690 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 371 transition count 690
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 364 transition count 676
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 364 transition count 676
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 364 transition count 675
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 361 transition count 672
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 361 transition count 672
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 359 transition count 670
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 359 transition count 670
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 358 transition count 669
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 358 transition count 669
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 357 transition count 668
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 357 transition count 668
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 356 transition count 667
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 356 transition count 667
Applied a total of 32 rules in 31 ms. Remains 356 /372 variables (removed 16) and now considering 667/690 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 667 rows 356 cols
[2024-05-20 13:34:50] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 285 ms returned [18, 263]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 300 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 354/372 places, 667/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 354 /354 variables (removed 0) and now considering 667/667 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 335 ms. Remains : 354/372 places, 667/690 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 667 transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality719256499889411019.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-20 13:34:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1000943840164049606.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality719256499889411019.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1000943840164049606.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.65047e+08,9.82279,185512,2,38558,5,513284,6,0,2085,574789,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-20 13:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-20 13:35:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-20 13:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15901334378989795207.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15901334378989795207.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15901334378989795207.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15901334378989795207.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15901334378989795207.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-20 13:35:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-20 13:35:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-20 13:35:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1153 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2024-05-20 13:35:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 60 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2024-05-20 13:35:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9679584713046284560.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-20 13:35:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16937294422047647414.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9679584713046284560.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16937294422047647414.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.65047e+08,2.04544,52816,2153,254,86913,2702,1185,198227,144,15055,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EF(EG((EX((i1.u70.p232==1)) + (i7.i1.i0.u101.p328==0))))) * AX((i1.u78.p252==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U EG((EX((i1.u70.p232==1)) + (i7.i1.i0.u101.p328==0)))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !((i1.u...178
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t276, t566, t587, t637, i1.t511, i1.t391, i2.t5, i3.t4, i3.t0, i4.u38.t65, i4.u47...437
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-20 13:35:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-20 13:35:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-20 13:35:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-20 13:35:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8385795576241215502.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8385795576241215502.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8385795576241215502.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8385795576241215502.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8385795576241215502.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-20 13:35:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-20 13:35:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-20 13:35:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1169 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-20 13:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-20 13:35:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 53 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-20 13:35:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13649726286239595631.gal : 10 ms
[2024-05-20 13:35:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9756473333281430747.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13649726286239595631.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9756473333281430747.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.81044e+08,1.76288,56256,2208,475,76041,18365,1274,223884,189,76144,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((i8.i1.u116.p304==1) U EG(AX((i5.i0.u12.p31==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((i8.i1.u116.p304==1) U EG(!(EX(!((i5.i0.u12.p31==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t284, t285, t589, t610, t660, i1.t535, i1.t407, i2.t4, i2.i0.t0, i4.i1.u39.t69, i...475
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,247.38,2311672,1,0,2.41885e+06,57462,2996,2.31204e+07,449,416945,2053840
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(((i5.i0.u13.p34==0)||(i2.i0.u29.p103==1)) U AF((i3.i1.u34.p109==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((i3.i1.u34.p109==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!((i3.i1.u34.p109==1))))) U (!(((i5.i0.u13.p34==...229
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,0,370.373,2639560,1,0,3.3029e+06,126842,3544,2.35637e+07,584,698450,4785178
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG((EX((i4.i0.u42.p130==1)) + (i8.i1.u114.p361==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EX((i4.i0.u42.p130==1)) + (i8.i1.u114.p361==0)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 2,1,607.524,2947944,1,0,3.36222e+06,128077,2996,2.79289e+07,449,704083,713049
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A((i8.i2.u112.p362==0) U !(AX((AG((i7.i1.u96.p300==1)) + !(E((i9.u93.p388==0) U (i6.u65.p57==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((i7.i1.u96.p300==1)))) + !(E((i9.u93.p388==0) U (i6.u65.p57==1))))))))))...400
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 3,1,618.263,2947944,1,0,3.36222e+06,128077,4581,2.79289e+07,624,704083,1998352
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(A(!((AF(((i6.u87.p273==1)&&((i0.u28.p89==0)||(i8.i2.u107.p332==1)))) * (((EX(((i9.u120.p390==0)||(i4.i3.u56.p171==1))) * (i3.i1.u34.p11...411
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((i6.u90.p279==1) + E(!((E(TRUE U (i4.i3.u56.p170==0)) * ((i1.u18.p48==0)||(i6.u91.p282==1))))...933
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 4,1,649.885,2947944,1,0,3.36222e+06,128077,4690,2.79289e+07,628,704083,3834001
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF(AX(AX(AF(((i5.i0.u11.p20!=0)&&(i2.i0.u59.p185!=1)))))) * EF((i2.i0.u31.p98==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((i5.i0.u11.p20!=0)&&(i2.i0.u59.p185!=1)))))))))))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(...193
(forward)formula 5,0,929.344,3244944,1,0,3.80114e+06,128077,2996,2.79289e+07,449,704083,3357486
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E(!((!(E(((EX((i5.i0.u10.p27==0)) * ((i6.u65.p58==0)||(i9.u93.p395==1))) * (i0.u22.p77==0)) U !((((i8.i2.u102.p321==0)||(i8.i1.u115.p369=...225
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!((!(E(((EX((i5.i0.u10.p27==0)) * ((i6.u65.p58==0)||(i9.u93.p395==1))) * (i0.u22.p77==0)) U !((((i8....277
(forward)formula 6,1,1137.31,3572164,1,0,3.80114e+06,128077,2998,3.1036e+07,449,704083,2742135
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EX(EF(EG((EX((i1.u70.p232==1)) + (i8.i2.u105.p328==0))))) * AX((i1.u80.p252==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U EG((EX((i1.u70.p232==1)) + (i8.i2.u105.p328==0)))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !((i1.u80....175
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 7,1,1215.31,3930188,1,0,3.80114e+06,128077,3293,3.51481e+07,536,704083,450217
FORMULA ASLink-PT-01a-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1850246 ms.

BK_STOP 1716213367929

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ASLink-PT-01a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ASLink-PT-01a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r004-smll-171620117600009"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ASLink-PT-01a.tgz
mv ASLink-PT-01a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;