fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r490-tall-167912709601126
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of Marcie+red for UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
5451.876 10425.00 13544.00 261.20 TTTFFTTTFFFFFTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r490-tall-167912709601126.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool marciexred
Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r490-tall-167912709601126
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 576K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K Feb 26 14:51 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K Feb 26 14:51 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 26 14:49 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K Feb 26 14:49 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Feb 25 17:24 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 32K Feb 25 17:24 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Feb 25 17:24 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Feb 25 17:24 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Feb 26 14:53 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 140K Feb 26 14:53 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Feb 26 14:52 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 110K Feb 26 14:52 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Feb 25 17:24 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.7K Feb 25 17:24 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 Mar 5 18:23 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 Mar 5 18:23 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Mar 5 18:23 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1679378997050

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=marciexred
BK_EXAMINATION=ReachabilityCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02
Applying reductions before tool marcie
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-21 06:09:58] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, ReachabilityCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2023-03-21 06:09:58] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-21 06:09:58] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 24 ms
[2023-03-21 06:09:58] [INFO ] Transformed 38 places.
[2023-03-21 06:09:58] [INFO ] Transformed 54 transitions.
[2023-03-21 06:09:58] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 38 places and 54 transitions and 170 arcs in 81 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/ReachabilityCardinality.xml in 17 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 8 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 8 transitions.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 402 ms. (steps per millisecond=24 ) properties (out of 8) seen :3
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 82 ms. (steps per millisecond=121 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 75 ms. (steps per millisecond=133 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 64 ms. (steps per millisecond=156 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 60 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 76 ms. (steps per millisecond=131 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 5 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 38 cols
[2023-03-21 06:09:59] [INFO ] Computed 7 place invariants in 6 ms
[2023-03-21 06:09:59] [INFO ] After 200ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:5
[2023-03-21 06:09:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 7 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2023-03-21 06:09:59] [INFO ] After 72ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :0
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
Fused 5 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
All properties solved without resorting to model-checking.
Total runtime 1258 ms.
timeout --kill-after=10s --signal=SIGINT 1m for testing only

Marcie built on Linux at 2019-11-18.
A model checker for Generalized Stochastic Petri nets

authors: Alex Tovchigrechko (IDD package and CTL model checking)

Martin Schwarick (Symbolic numerical analysis and CSL model checking)

Christian Rohr (Simulative and approximative numerical model checking)

marcie@informatik.tu-cottbus.de

called as: /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../marcie/bin/marcie --net-file=model.pnml --mcc-file=ReachabilityCardinality.xml --memory=6 --mcc-mode

parse successfull
net created successfully

Net: UtilityControlRoom_PT_Z2T4N02
(NrP: 38 NrTr: 54 NrArc: 170)

parse formulas
formulas created successfully
place and transition orderings generation:0m 0.000sec

net check time: 0m 0.000sec

init dd package: 0m 2.740sec


RS generation: 0m 0.004sec


-> reachability set: #nodes 332 (3.3e+02) #states 1,092 (3)



starting MCC model checker
--------------------------

checking: AG [~ [ControlRoomDispatch_0<=3]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ControlRoomDispatch_0<=3]]

abstracting: (ControlRoomDispatch_0<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.002sec

checking: AG [~ [Finished_1<=3]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U Finished_1<=3]]

abstracting: (Finished_1<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.000sec

checking: AG [4<=StartSecuring_1_0]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [4<=StartSecuring_1_0]]]

abstracting: (4<=StartSecuring_1_0)
states: 0
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.000sec

checking: AG [OpenRequests_1_0<=Clients_1]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [OpenRequests_1_0<=Clients_1]]]

abstracting: (OpenRequests_1_0<=Clients_1)
states: 972
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.002sec

checking: AG [OpenRequests_1_1<=StartSecuring_1_0]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [OpenRequests_1_1<=StartSecuring_1_0]]]

abstracting: (OpenRequests_1_1<=StartSecuring_1_0)
states: 972
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.001sec

checking: EF [sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=3]
normalized: E [true U sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=3]

abstracting: (sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.022sec

checking: EF [[~ [ClientsWaiting_0<=OpenRequests_0_1] | IdleTechs_0<=OpenRequests_0_0]]
normalized: E [true U [~ [ClientsWaiting_0<=OpenRequests_0_1] | IdleTechs_0<=OpenRequests_0_0]]

abstracting: (IdleTechs_0<=OpenRequests_0_0)
states: 728
abstracting: (ClientsWaiting_0<=OpenRequests_0_1)
states: 700
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.003sec

checking: AG [~ [[StartSecuring_0_0<=ControlRoomDispatch_1 & ~ [[~ [MovetoZ_0_1_0<=MovetoZ_1_1_1] & [3<=OpenRequests_0_1 & ~ [Clients_0<=OpenRequests_0_1]]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U [~ [[[~ [Clients_0<=OpenRequests_0_1] & 3<=OpenRequests_0_1] & ~ [MovetoZ_0_1_0<=MovetoZ_1_1_1]]] & StartSecuring_0_0<=ControlRoomDispatch_1]]]

abstracting: (StartSecuring_0_0<=ControlRoomDispatch_1)
states: 1,032 (3)
abstracting: (MovetoZ_0_1_0<=MovetoZ_1_1_1)
states: 1,028 (3)
abstracting: (3<=OpenRequests_0_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (Clients_0<=OpenRequests_0_1)
states: 1,032 (3)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.001sec

checking: EF [[[69<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) | sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=Idles] | sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=68]]
normalized: E [true U [[69<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) | sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=Idles] | sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=68]]

abstracting: (sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=68)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=Idles)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (69<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0))
states: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.065sec

checking: AG [[[sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0) & ~ [[~ [sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=0] | sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=74]]] | [sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=42 | [33<=Idles & [[~ [sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)] | [NumClientsReq<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0) & ~ [87<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)]]] & ~ [80<=Idles]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[~ [[~ [sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=0] | sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=74]] & sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)] | [[[~ [80<=Idles] & [[~ [87<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)] & NumClientsReq<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)] | ~ [sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)]]] & 33<=Idles] | sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=42]]]]]

abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=42)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (33<=Idles)
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0))
states: 308
abstracting: (NumClientsReq<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0))
states: 299
abstracting: (87<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (80<=Idles)
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0))
states: 983
abstracting: (sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=74)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=0)
states: 864
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.154sec

checking: EF [[30<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0) | [[[[[~ [[[sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0) & 25<=Idles] | [17<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0) | sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=Idles]]] | sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=83] & [sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0) | ~ [[26<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0) & [sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) & Idles<=25]]]]] | sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)] | [sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=30 & ~ [NumClientsReq<=32]]] | ~ [[86<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0) & sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=14]]]]]
normalized: E [true U [[[[[[~ [[[17<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0) | sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=Idles] | [sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0) & 25<=Idles]]] | sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=83] & [~ [[[sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) & Idles<=25] & 26<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]] | sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]] | sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)] | [~ [NumClientsReq<=32] & sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=30]] | ~ [[86<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0) & sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=14]]] | 30<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]]

abstracting: (30<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=14)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (86<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=30)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (NumClientsReq<=32)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0))
states: 1,008 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 896
abstracting: (26<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (Idles<=25)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0))
states: 119
abstracting: (sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=83)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (25<=Idles)
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0))
states: 724
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=Idles)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (17<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0))
states: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.266sec

checking: EF [[[[[[24<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0) | ~ [[[[sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=94 | 38<=Idles] & [sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0) | sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]] | sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)]]] & [[10<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0) & sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)] & ~ [Idles<=67]]] & ~ [[[99<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) & ~ [[sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0) | 38<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)]]] & sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=13]]] & ~ [85<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)]] & sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]]
normalized: E [true U [[~ [85<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)] & [~ [[[~ [[sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0) | 38<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)]] & 99<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)] & sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=13]] & [[~ [Idles<=67] & [10<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0) & sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)]] & [~ [[[[sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0) | sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)] & [sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=94 | 38<=Idles]] | sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)]] | 24<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)]]]] & sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]]

abstracting: (sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 676
abstracting: (24<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 868
abstracting: (38<=Idles)
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=94)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 507
abstracting: (sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 708
abstracting: (sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0))
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (10<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (Idles<=67)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=13)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (99<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (38<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 55
abstracting: (85<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0))
states: 0
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.276sec

checking: AG [[sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=37 & [[sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=11 | ~ [[[~ [[sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=35 & 77<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)]] & ~ [[[sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=22 & sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=41] & ~ [88<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)]]]] & ~ [[sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0) & sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)]]]]] | [~ [sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)] | [[[~ [sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)] & ~ [[~ [sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=97] & 96<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]]] | [[sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0) & ~ [80<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)]] | Idles<=80]] | 91<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[[[[[[~ [80<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)] & sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)] | Idles<=80] | [~ [[~ [sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=97] & 96<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]] & ~ [sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)]]] | 91<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)] | ~ [sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]] | [~ [[~ [[sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0) & sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)]] & [~ [[~ [88<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)] & [sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=22 & sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=41]]] & ~ [[sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=35 & 77<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)]]]]] | sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=11]] & sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=37]]]]

abstracting: (sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=37)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=11)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (77<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=35)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=41)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=22)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (88<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0))
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0))
states: 1,019 (3)
abstracting: (sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 976
abstracting: (91<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0))
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (96<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=97)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (Idles<=80)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0))
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (80<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0))
states: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.352sec

checking: EF [[[[Assigned_0_1<=3 & ~ [[~ [[OpenRequests_1_0<=3 & ClientsWaiting_1<=DoSecuring_0_0]] | [~ [ClientsTimeout_0<=MovetoZ_1_0_0] | ~ [MovetoZ_1_1_1<=OpenRequests_0_0]]]]] & [[[3<=Finished_1 | 4<=Clients_1] | [[~ [[[1<=ClientsTimeout_1 | 4<=Assigned_1_0] & 1<=DoSecuring_1_0]] | [[~ [4<=DoSecuring_0_1] & [1<=Idles & Finished_0<=3]] | OpenRequests_1_0<=IdleTechs_0]] & [[OpenRequests_0_1<=0 | [~ [3<=Assigned_1_1] | ~ [Assigned_1_0<=ControlRoomDispatch_1]]] & 4<=OpenRequests_0_0]]] | [~ [[[[4<=ClientsTimeout_1 | [2<=ClientsTimeout_1 | 2<=OpenRequests_1_1]] & ~ [[MovetoZ_1_0_1<=3 | 2<=ClientsTimeout_0]]] | [OpenRequests_1_1<=2 | [[1<=StartSecuring_1_0 & OpenRequests_0_1<=MovetoZ_1_0_0] | ~ [MovetoZ_0_0_1<=IdleTechs_0]]]]] | ~ [[[[[MovetoZ_0_0_0<=2 & 3<=ClientsWaiting_0] | ~ [2<=Finished_1]] & [[MovetoZ_1_1_0<=2 | 2<=ClientsTimeout_0] | [Idles<=2 & 2<=ClientsTimeout_1]]] & ~ [[4<=OpenRequests_1_1 & Finished_0<=ControlRoomDispatch_0]]]]]]] & [IdleTechs_1<=3 & [[[[[[[StartSecuring_1_1<=MovetoZ_1_0_0 & MovetoZ_1_0_0<=3] & Assigned_0_1<=ControlRoomDispatch_1] & DoSecuring_0_0<=0] & IdleTechs_1<=ControlRoomDispatch_0] | ~ [ClientsWaiting_0<=1]] | ~ [[~ [[OpenRequests_1_1<=3 & ControlRoomDispatch_1<=4]] | [~ [MovetoZ_1_0_1<=3] | [[IdleTechs_1<=IdleTechs_1 | DoSecuring_0_0<=4] & ~ [1<=Assigned_1_1]]]]]] | [[[2<=ClientsTimeout_0 | StartSecuring_0_0<=MovetoZ_0_0_1] & [[[[1<=OpenRequests_1_0 & 2<=Finished_0] & MovetoZ_0_1_1<=3] & [[2<=StartSecuring_0_1 | 4<=Finished_1] & [OpenRequests_0_1<=OpenRequests_0_1 | ClientsTimeout_0<=1]]] | [[ControlRoomDispatch_0<=1 & 2<=MovetoZ_1_0_1] | [[1<=ControlRoomDispatch_1 & DoSecuring_0_1<=DoSecuring_1_1] | Assigned_0_0<=StartSecuring_0_1]]]] | 2<=DoSecuring_0_0]]]]]
normalized: E [true U [[[[[[[[[1<=ControlRoomDispatch_1 & DoSecuring_0_1<=DoSecuring_1_1] | Assigned_0_0<=StartSecuring_0_1] | [ControlRoomDispatch_0<=1 & 2<=MovetoZ_1_0_1]] | [[[OpenRequests_0_1<=OpenRequests_0_1 | ClientsTimeout_0<=1] & [2<=StartSecuring_0_1 | 4<=Finished_1]] & [[1<=OpenRequests_1_0 & 2<=Finished_0] & MovetoZ_0_1_1<=3]]] & [2<=ClientsTimeout_0 | StartSecuring_0_0<=MovetoZ_0_0_1]] | 2<=DoSecuring_0_0] | [~ [[[[~ [1<=Assigned_1_1] & [IdleTechs_1<=IdleTechs_1 | DoSecuring_0_0<=4]] | ~ [MovetoZ_1_0_1<=3]] | ~ [[OpenRequests_1_1<=3 & ControlRoomDispatch_1<=4]]]] | [~ [ClientsWaiting_0<=1] | [[[[StartSecuring_1_1<=MovetoZ_1_0_0 & MovetoZ_1_0_0<=3] & Assigned_0_1<=ControlRoomDispatch_1] & DoSecuring_0_0<=0] & IdleTechs_1<=ControlRoomDispatch_0]]]] & IdleTechs_1<=3] & [[[[[[[~ [3<=Assigned_1_1] | ~ [Assigned_1_0<=ControlRoomDispatch_1]] | OpenRequests_0_1<=0] & 4<=OpenRequests_0_0] & [[[[1<=Idles & Finished_0<=3] & ~ [4<=DoSecuring_0_1]] | OpenRequests_1_0<=IdleTechs_0] | ~ [[[1<=ClientsTimeout_1 | 4<=Assigned_1_0] & 1<=DoSecuring_1_0]]]] | [3<=Finished_1 | 4<=Clients_1]] | [~ [[~ [[4<=OpenRequests_1_1 & Finished_0<=ControlRoomDispatch_0]] & [[[Idles<=2 & 2<=ClientsTimeout_1] | [MovetoZ_1_1_0<=2 | 2<=ClientsTimeout_0]] & [~ [2<=Finished_1] | [MovetoZ_0_0_0<=2 & 3<=ClientsWaiting_0]]]]] | ~ [[[[~ [MovetoZ_0_0_1<=IdleTechs_0] | [1<=StartSecuring_1_0 & OpenRequests_0_1<=MovetoZ_1_0_0]] | OpenRequests_1_1<=2] | [~ [[MovetoZ_1_0_1<=3 | 2<=ClientsTimeout_0]] & [[2<=ClientsTimeout_1 | 2<=OpenRequests_1_1] | 4<=ClientsTimeout_1]]]]]] & [~ [[[~ [MovetoZ_1_1_1<=OpenRequests_0_0] | ~ [ClientsTimeout_0<=MovetoZ_1_0_0]] | ~ [[OpenRequests_1_0<=3 & ClientsWaiting_1<=DoSecuring_0_0]]]] & Assigned_0_1<=3]]]]

abstracting: (Assigned_0_1<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (ClientsWaiting_1<=DoSecuring_0_0)
states: 654
abstracting: (OpenRequests_1_0<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (ClientsTimeout_0<=MovetoZ_1_0_0)
states: 668
abstracting: (MovetoZ_1_1_1<=OpenRequests_0_0)
states: 1,032 (3)
abstracting: (4<=ClientsTimeout_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=OpenRequests_1_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=ClientsTimeout_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=ClientsTimeout_0)
states: 0
abstracting: (MovetoZ_1_0_1<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (OpenRequests_1_1<=2)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (OpenRequests_0_1<=MovetoZ_1_0_0)
states: 980
abstracting: (1<=StartSecuring_1_0)
states: 68
abstracting: (MovetoZ_0_0_1<=IdleTechs_0)
states: 1,040 (3)
abstracting: (3<=ClientsWaiting_0)
states: 0
abstracting: (MovetoZ_0_0_0<=2)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (2<=Finished_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=ClientsTimeout_0)
states: 0
abstracting: (MovetoZ_1_1_0<=2)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (2<=ClientsTimeout_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (Idles<=2)
states: 399
abstracting: (Finished_0<=ControlRoomDispatch_0)
states: 1,032 (3)
abstracting: (4<=OpenRequests_1_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (4<=Clients_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (3<=Finished_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=DoSecuring_1_0)
states: 34
abstracting: (4<=Assigned_1_0)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=ClientsTimeout_1)
states: 452
abstracting: (OpenRequests_1_0<=IdleTechs_0)
states: 1,040 (3)
abstracting: (4<=DoSecuring_0_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (Finished_0<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (1<=Idles)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (4<=OpenRequests_0_0)
states: 0
abstracting: (OpenRequests_0_1<=0)
states: 972
abstracting: (Assigned_1_0<=ControlRoomDispatch_1)
states: 1,024 (3)
abstracting: (3<=Assigned_1_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (IdleTechs_1<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (IdleTechs_1<=ControlRoomDispatch_0)
states: 728
abstracting: (DoSecuring_0_0<=0)
states: 1,058 (3)
abstracting: (Assigned_0_1<=ControlRoomDispatch_1)
states: 1,032 (3)
abstracting: (MovetoZ_1_0_0<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (StartSecuring_1_1<=MovetoZ_1_0_0)
states: 1,024 (3)
abstracting: (ClientsWaiting_0<=1)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (ControlRoomDispatch_1<=4)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (OpenRequests_1_1<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (MovetoZ_1_0_1<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (DoSecuring_0_0<=4)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (IdleTechs_1<=IdleTechs_1)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (1<=Assigned_1_1)
states: 68
abstracting: (2<=DoSecuring_0_0)
states: 0
abstracting: (StartSecuring_0_0<=MovetoZ_0_0_1)
states: 1,024 (3)
abstracting: (2<=ClientsTimeout_0)
states: 0
abstracting: (MovetoZ_0_1_1<=3)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (2<=Finished_0)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=OpenRequests_1_0)
states: 120
abstracting: (4<=Finished_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=StartSecuring_0_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (ClientsTimeout_0<=1)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (OpenRequests_0_1<=OpenRequests_0_1)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (2<=MovetoZ_1_0_1)
states: 0
abstracting: (ControlRoomDispatch_0<=1)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (Assigned_0_0<=StartSecuring_0_1)
states: 1,024 (3)
abstracting: (DoSecuring_0_1<=DoSecuring_1_1)
states: 1,059 (3)
abstracting: (1<=ControlRoomDispatch_1)
states: 120
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.006sec

checking: EF [~ [[[[~ [sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=60] | sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)<=74] | [[sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0) | sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)] & ~ [sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=20]]] | [[[[~ [[[sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0) | sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=38] | [sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) | 28<=NumClientsReq]]] & Idles<=NumClientsReq] & [[[[13<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0) | 78<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)] & sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)] | ~ [22<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)]] & [[~ [sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=Idles] | NumClientsReq<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)] & ~ [sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=NumClientsReq]]]] | [[[~ [[88<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0) | sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]] | [[sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=29 & sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=40] | ~ [70<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)]]] | sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=74] & sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=30]] | [~ [sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)] | ~ [sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)]]]]]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [[[[[[[[~ [sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=Idles] | NumClientsReq<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)] & ~ [sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=NumClientsReq]] & [~ [22<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)] | [[13<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0) | 78<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)] & sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)]]] & [~ [[[sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) | 28<=NumClientsReq] | [sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0) | sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=38]]] & Idles<=NumClientsReq]] | [[[[~ [70<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)] | [sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=29 & sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=40]] | ~ [[88<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0) | sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]]] | sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=74] & sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=30]] | [~ [sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)] | ~ [sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)]]] | [[~ [sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=20] & [sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0) | sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)]] | [~ [sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=60] | sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)<=74]]]]]

abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)<=74)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=60)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0))
states: 119
abstracting: (sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=20)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 55
abstracting: (sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 492
abstracting: (sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)<=30)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=74)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 507
abstracting: (88<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=40)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=29)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (70<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (Idles<=NumClientsReq)
states: 324
abstracting: (sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=38)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0))
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (28<=NumClientsReq)
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0))
states: 119
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0))
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (78<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (13<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (22<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=NumClientsReq)
states: 1,083 (3)
abstracting: (NumClientsReq<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0))
states: 299
abstracting: (sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=Idles)
states: 1,092 (3)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.392sec

checking: EF [~ [[~ [[[[[~ [[sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(Finished_1, Finished_0) | sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)]] | 43<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)] & 80<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)] | [[[[sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=80 & 8<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)] | [86<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0) | sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)]] | ~ [sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=55]] | [[[sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=50 | 47<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)] & ~ [sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=39]] | [[sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=Idles & 57<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)] & [56<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0) & 92<=Idles]]]]] | [[[~ [[sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=19 | 17<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)]] | [[80<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0) | 39<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)] | [65<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0) & sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=56]]] & [[5<=NumClientsReq | [sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=NumClientsReq & sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=29]] & [[Idles<=19 | sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)] | [29<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) | sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]]]] & ~ [[~ [sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)] | [sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0) & [sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) | sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)]]]]]]] & ~ [[[[[~ [[sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=32 | 77<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)]] & ~ [[sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=95 | sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=100]]] & ~ [[[sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=37 & 38<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)] | ~ [sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=88]]]] | ~ [[[~ [sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)] & ~ [23<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)]] & [[sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=80 | sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=66] | [61<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0) | 9<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)]]]]] & ~ [sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=Idles]]]]]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [[~ [[~ [sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=Idles] & [~ [[[[61<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0) | 9<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)] | [sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=80 | sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=66]] & [~ [23<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)] & ~ [sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)]]]] | [~ [[~ [sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=88] | [sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=37 & 38<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)]]] & [~ [[sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=95 | sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=100]] & ~ [[sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=32 | 77<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)]]]]]]] & ~ [[[~ [[[[sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) | sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)] & sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)] | ~ [sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)]]] & [[[[29<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) | sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)] | [Idles<=19 | sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)]] & [[sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=NumClientsReq & sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=29] | 5<=NumClientsReq]] & [[[65<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0) & sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=56] | [80<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0) | 39<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)]] | ~ [[sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=19 | 17<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)]]]]] | [[[[[56<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0) & 92<=Idles] & [sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=Idles & 57<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0)]] | [~ [sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=39] & [sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=50 | 47<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)]]] | [~ [sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=55] | [[86<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0) | sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)] | [sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=80 & 8<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)]]]] | [80<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0) & [~ [[sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(Finished_1, Finished_0) | sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0)]] | 43<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (43<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0))
states: 308
abstracting: (sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(Finished_1, Finished_0))
states: 852
abstracting: (80<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (8<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=80)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0))
states: 1,016 (3)
abstracting: (86<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=55)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (47<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=50)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0)<=39)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (57<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=Idles)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (92<=Idles)
states: 0
abstracting: (56<=sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (17<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=19)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (39<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (80<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0)<=56)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (65<=sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (5<=NumClientsReq)
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=29)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=NumClientsReq)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0))
states: 1,019 (3)
abstracting: (Idles<=19)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 676
abstracting: (29<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0))
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(StartSecuring_1_1, StartSecuring_1_0, StartSecuring_0_1, StartSecuring_0_0)<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0))
states: 900
abstracting: (sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=sum(ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0))
states: 916
abstracting: (sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0))
states: 992
abstracting: (77<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=32)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(IdleTechs_1, IdleTechs_0)<=100)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=95)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (38<=sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(OpenRequests_1_1, OpenRequests_1_0, OpenRequests_0_1, OpenRequests_0_0)<=37)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(Finished_1, Finished_0)<=88)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=sum(ClientsTimeout_1, ClientsTimeout_0, ClientsWaiting_1, ClientsWaiting_0, Clients_1, Clients_0))
states: 1,080 (3)
abstracting: (23<=sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(DoSecuring_1_1, DoSecuring_1_0, DoSecuring_0_1, DoSecuring_0_0)<=66)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0)<=80)
states: 1,092 (3)
abstracting: (9<=sum(ControlRoomDispatch_1, ControlRoomDispatch_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (61<=sum(Assigned_1_1, Assigned_1_0, Assigned_0_1, Assigned_0_0))
states: 0
abstracting: (sum(MovetoZ_1_1_1, MovetoZ_1_1_0, MovetoZ_1_0_1, MovetoZ_1_0_0, MovetoZ_0_1_1, MovetoZ_0_1_0, MovetoZ_0_0_1, MovetoZ_0_0_0)<=Idles)
states: 1,092 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02-ReachabilityCardinality-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.921sec

totally nodes used: 12124 (1.2e+04)
number of garbage collections: 0
fire ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 17887 51347 69234
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 54286 67054578 16 1024MB
basic ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 12214 41839 54053
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 60528 16716688 12 192MB
unary ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 8 128MB
abstract ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 19214 19214
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 1 16777215 12 192MB
state nr cache: hits/miss/sum: 2240 4928 7168
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 4928 8383680 32 256MB
max state cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 8388608 32 256MB
uniqueHash elements/entry size/size: 67108864 4 256MB
0 67097072
1 11630
2 99
3 32
4 11
5 5
6 4
7 5
8 1
9 1
>= 10 4

Total processing time: 0m 6.791sec


BK_STOP 1679379007475

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination ReachabilityCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
check for maximal unmarked siphon
ok
check for constant places
ok
check if there are places and transitions
ok
check if there are transitions without pre-places
ok
check if at least one transition is enabled in m0
ok
check if there are transitions that can never fire
ok


initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:847 (15), effective:62 (1)

initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:54 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:54 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:54 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:405 (7), effective:33 (0)

iterations count:405 (7), effective:33 (0)

iterations count:54 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:195 (3), effective:16 (0)

iterations count:59 (1), effective:2 (0)

iterations count:54 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:54 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:109 (2), effective:6 (0)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="marciexred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool marciexred"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r490-tall-167912709601126"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N02 execution
cd execution
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME ReachabilityCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;