fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r490-tall-167912708600434
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of Marcie+red for Szymanski-PT-a10

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
7521.876 110679.00 106360.00 7115.70 FFTFFFFFTFTFFTFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r490-tall-167912708600434.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool marciexred
Input is Szymanski-PT-a10, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r490-tall-167912708600434
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K Feb 26 17:00 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K Feb 26 17:00 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Feb 26 16:59 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K Feb 26 16:59 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Feb 25 17:18 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Feb 25 17:18 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Feb 25 17:18 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Feb 25 17:18 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K Feb 26 17:02 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K Feb 26 17:02 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 26 17:01 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K Feb 26 17:01 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Feb 25 17:18 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Feb 25 17:18 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 5 18:23 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 101K Mar 5 18:23 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1679255160178

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=marciexred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Szymanski-PT-a10
Applying reductions before tool marcie
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-19 19:46:01] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2023-03-19 19:46:01] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-19 19:46:01] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 52 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:01] [INFO ] Transformed 61 places.
[2023-03-19 19:46:01] [INFO ] Transformed 224 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:01] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 61 places and 224 transitions and 900 arcs in 108 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 8 transitions.
FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 43 out of 49 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 49/49 places, 216/216 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 47 transition count 216
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 47 /49 variables (removed 2) and now considering 216/216 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 137 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 47 cols
[2023-03-19 19:46:01] [INFO ] Computed 1 place invariants in 12 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
[2023-03-19 19:46:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 137 similar events)
[2023-03-19 19:46:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 254 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 137 similar events)
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 112 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/49 places, 216/216 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 379 ms. Remains : 47/49 places, 216/216 transitions.
Support contains 43 out of 47 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 216 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 14 resets, run finished after 313 ms. (steps per millisecond=31 ) properties (out of 79) seen :47
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 32) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 31) seen :7
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 24) seen :3
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 21 properties.
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 137 similar events)
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-19 19:46:02] [INFO ] After 111ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:21
[2023-03-19 19:46:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-19 19:46:03] [INFO ] After 307ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :7 sat :14
[2023-03-19 19:46:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-19 19:46:03] [INFO ] After 58ms SMT Verify possible using 9 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :7 sat :14
[2023-03-19 19:46:03] [INFO ] After 170ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :7 sat :14
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 58 ms.
[2023-03-19 19:46:03] [INFO ] After 623ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :7 sat :14
Fused 21 Parikh solutions to 14 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 85 ms.
Support contains 14 out of 47 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 43 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 43 transition count 200
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 16 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 43 transition count 184
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 42 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 42 transition count 180
Applied a total of 26 rules in 22 ms. Remains 42 /47 variables (removed 5) and now considering 180/216 (removed 36) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 25 ms. Remains : 42/47 places, 180/216 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 49 ms. (steps per millisecond=204 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=384 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=357 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=434 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=434 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 27 ms. (steps per millisecond=370 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 27 ms. (steps per millisecond=370 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=384 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 34 ms. (steps per millisecond=294 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=384 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=357 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=400 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=322 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 27 ms. (steps per millisecond=370 ) properties (out of 14) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=384 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 5905 steps, run visited all 13 properties in 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=210 )
Probabilistic random walk after 5905 steps, saw 4530 distinct states, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=210 ) properties seen :13
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 216 transitions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 36 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 43 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 43 transition count 200
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 43 /47 variables (removed 4) and now considering 200/216 (removed 16) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 43/47 places, 200/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 42 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 42 transition count 196
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 42 /47 variables (removed 5) and now considering 196/216 (removed 20) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 42/47 places, 196/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 44 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 44 transition count 204
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 16 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 44 transition count 188
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 42 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 42 transition count 180
Applied a total of 26 rules in 21 ms. Remains 42 /47 variables (removed 5) and now considering 180/216 (removed 36) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 42/47 places, 180/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 180 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 44 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 44 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /47 variables (removed 3) and now considering 204/216 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 44/47 places, 204/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 204 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 43 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 43 transition count 200
Applied a total of 8 rules in 1 ms. Remains 43 /47 variables (removed 4) and now considering 200/216 (removed 16) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 43/47 places, 200/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 43 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 43 transition count 200
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 43 /47 variables (removed 4) and now considering 200/216 (removed 16) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 43/47 places, 200/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 43 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 43 transition count 200
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 43 /47 variables (removed 4) and now considering 200/216 (removed 16) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 43/47 places, 200/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 43 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 43 transition count 200
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 16 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 43 transition count 184
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 42 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 42 transition count 180
Applied a total of 26 rules in 13 ms. Remains 42 /47 variables (removed 5) and now considering 180/216 (removed 36) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13 ms. Remains : 42/47 places, 180/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 180 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 44 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 44 transition count 204
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 16 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 44 transition count 188
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 42 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 42 transition count 180
Applied a total of 26 rules in 11 ms. Remains 42 /47 variables (removed 5) and now considering 180/216 (removed 36) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11 ms. Remains : 42/47 places, 180/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 180 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 42 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 42 transition count 196
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 42 /47 variables (removed 5) and now considering 196/216 (removed 20) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 42/47 places, 196/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 42 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 42 transition count 196
Drop transitions removed 12 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 12 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 42 transition count 184
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 41 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 41 transition count 180
Applied a total of 24 rules in 11 ms. Remains 41 /47 variables (removed 6) and now considering 180/216 (removed 36) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11 ms. Remains : 41/47 places, 180/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 180 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 42 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 42 transition count 196
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 42 /47 variables (removed 5) and now considering 196/216 (removed 20) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 42/47 places, 196/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 43 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 43 transition count 200
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 43 /47 variables (removed 4) and now considering 200/216 (removed 16) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 43/47 places, 200/216 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 13 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 3 ms.
[2023-03-19 19:46:04] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 47 places, 216 transitions and 860 arcs took 2 ms.
Total runtime 3673 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
timeout --kill-after=10s --signal=SIGINT 1m for testing only

Marcie built on Linux at 2019-11-18.
A model checker for Generalized Stochastic Petri nets

authors: Alex Tovchigrechko (IDD package and CTL model checking)

Martin Schwarick (Symbolic numerical analysis and CSL model checking)

Christian Rohr (Simulative and approximative numerical model checking)

marcie@informatik.tu-cottbus.de

called as: /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../marcie/bin/marcie --net-file=model.pnml --mcc-file=CTLFireability.xml --memory=6 --mcc-mode

parse successfull
net created successfully

Net: Petri
(NrP: 47 NrTr: 216 NrArc: 860)

parse formulas
formulas created successfully
place and transition orderings generation:0m 0.001sec

net check time: 0m 0.000sec

init dd package: 0m 2.787sec


RS generation: 0m14.647sec


-> reachability set: #nodes 8414 (8.4e+03) #states 284,523,132,989,069 (14)



starting MCC model checker
--------------------------

checking: EG [AG [EF [~ [A [[1<=p2 & 1<=p32] U [1<=p2 & 1<=p21]]]]]]
normalized: EG [~ [E [true U ~ [E [true U ~ [[~ [E [~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p21]] U [~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p32]] & ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p21]]]]] & ~ [EG [~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p21]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p32)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)

EG iterations: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 1.567sec

checking: AX [EG [[EF [[1<=p0 & 1<=p12]] & EG [AX [[p2<=0 | p31<=0]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [EX [~ [EG [[EG [~ [EX [~ [[p2<=0 | p31<=0]]]]] & E [true U [1<=p0 & 1<=p12]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 119,852,796,887,252 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (p31<=0)
states: 185,573,774,757,670 (14)
abstracting: (p2<=0)
states: 204,230,445,686,203 (14)
.....................
EG iterations: 20
......................
EG iterations: 22
.-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m10.003sec

checking: EF [AG [[1<=p2 & [1<=p40 & [AG [[1<=p1 & 1<=p37]] | 1<=p29]]]]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [E [true U ~ [[1<=p2 & [1<=p40 & [1<=p29 | ~ [E [true U ~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p37]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p29)
states: 98,949,317,480,910 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p40)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.947sec

checking: AG [AX [EF [[EF [[p0<=0 | p16<=0]] | [[p1<=0 | p17<=0] & [p0<=0 | p24<=0]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U EX [~ [E [true U [[[p0<=0 | p24<=0] & [p1<=0 | p17<=0]] | E [true U [p0<=0 | p16<=0]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (p16<=0)
states: 181,664,378,033,697 (14)
abstracting: (p0<=0)
states: 264,575,398,550,007 (14)
abstracting: (p17<=0)
states: 181,664,378,033,697 (14)
abstracting: (p1<=0)
states: 204,230,465,716,212 (14)
abstracting: (p24<=0)
states: 181,664,378,033,697 (14)
abstracting: (p0<=0)
states: 264,575,398,550,007 (14)
.-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.098sec

checking: AG [AX [[A [[1<=p2 & 1<=p44] U [1<=p2 & 1<=p25]] & [p3<=0 | p40<=0]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U EX [~ [[[p3<=0 | p40<=0] & [~ [EG [~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p25]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p25]] U [~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p44]] & ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p25]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p44)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (p40<=0)
states: 185,573,774,757,670 (14)
abstracting: (p3<=0)
states: 264,575,405,456,908 (14)
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.882sec

checking: AG [~ [A [[EX [[1<=p1 & 1<=p31]] & [1<=p0 & 1<=p8]] U AF [[[1<=p3 & 1<=p8] & [1<=p3 & 1<=p39]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U [~ [EG [EG [~ [[[1<=p3 & 1<=p39] & [1<=p3 & 1<=p8]]]]]] & ~ [E [EG [~ [[[1<=p3 & 1<=p39] & [1<=p3 & 1<=p8]]]] U [~ [[[1<=p0 & 1<=p8] & EX [[1<=p1 & 1<=p31]]]] & EG [~ [[[1<=p3 & 1<=p39] & [1<=p3 & 1<=p8]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 35,905,489,609,834 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p39)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
.abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 35,905,489,609,834 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 35,905,489,609,834 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p39)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 35,905,489,609,834 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p39)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 4.787sec

checking: E [AG [[~ [A [[1<=p2 & 1<=p13] U [1<=p0 & 1<=p30]]] | ~ [[AF [[1<=p1 & 1<=p16]] & [1<=p3 & 1<=p42]]]]] U [1<=p3 & 1<=p9]]
normalized: E [~ [E [true U ~ [[~ [[[1<=p3 & 1<=p42] & ~ [EG [~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p16]]]]]] | ~ [[~ [EG [~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p30]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p30]] U [~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p13]] & ~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p30]]]]]]]]]]] U [1<=p3 & 1<=p9]]

abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 54,409,301,006,723 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p30)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p30)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p30)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p42)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 2.811sec

checking: AG [[EF [[p3<=0 | p38<=0]] & [[[EX [[1<=p1 & 1<=p38]] & [AG [[p3<=0 | p35<=0]] & EX [[p3<=0 | p8<=0]]]] | [EF [EG [[1<=p2 & 1<=p17]]] & EF [[p3<=0 | p28<=0]]]] & [p0<=0 | p24<=0]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[[[E [true U [p3<=0 | p28<=0]] & E [true U EG [[1<=p2 & 1<=p17]]]] | [[EX [[p3<=0 | p8<=0]] & ~ [E [true U ~ [[p3<=0 | p35<=0]]]]] & EX [[1<=p1 & 1<=p38]]]] & [p0<=0 | p24<=0]] & E [true U [p3<=0 | p38<=0]]]]]]

abstracting: (p38<=0)
states: 185,573,774,757,670 (14)
abstracting: (p3<=0)
states: 264,575,405,456,908 (14)
abstracting: (p24<=0)
states: 181,664,378,033,697 (14)
abstracting: (p0<=0)
states: 264,575,398,550,007 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p38)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
.abstracting: (p35<=0)
states: 185,573,774,757,670 (14)
abstracting: (p3<=0)
states: 264,575,405,456,908 (14)
abstracting: (p8<=0)
states: 248,617,643,379,235 (14)
abstracting: (p3<=0)
states: 264,575,405,456,908 (14)
.abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
.............................
EG iterations: 29
abstracting: (p28<=0)
states: 181,664,378,033,697 (14)
abstracting: (p3<=0)
states: 264,575,405,456,908 (14)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 9.916sec

checking: AG [A [~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p26]] U [~ [[[AG [[1<=p1 & 1<=p16]] | [1<=p2 & 1<=p17]] | [[1<=p0 & 1<=p20] | [1<=p3 & 1<=p17]]]] & AG [[~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p22]] | [1<=p3 & 1<=p11]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[~ [EG [~ [[~ [E [true U ~ [[[1<=p3 & 1<=p11] | ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p22]]]]]] & ~ [[[[1<=p3 & 1<=p17] | [1<=p0 & 1<=p20]] | [[1<=p2 & 1<=p17] | ~ [E [true U ~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p16]]]]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[~ [E [true U ~ [[[1<=p3 & 1<=p11] | ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p22]]]]]] & ~ [[[[1<=p3 & 1<=p17] | [1<=p0 & 1<=p20]] | [[1<=p2 & 1<=p17] | ~ [E [true U ~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p16]]]]]]]]] U [[1<=p1 & 1<=p26] & ~ [[~ [E [true U ~ [[[1<=p3 & 1<=p11] | ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p22]]]]]] & ~ [[[[1<=p3 & 1<=p17] | [1<=p0 & 1<=p20]] | [[1<=p2 & 1<=p17] | ~ [E [true U ~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p16]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p20)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 58,813,402,884,028 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p26)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p20)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 58,813,402,884,028 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p20)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 58,813,402,884,028 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 7.347sec

checking: A [[E [[1<=p2 & 1<=p20] U [1<=p1 & 1<=p11]] | [AX [[1<=p0 & 1<=p16]] | A [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p9]] U EX [[1<=p1 & 1<=p31]]]]] U EF [[[AF [AG [[1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]] & 1<=p2] & [1<=p26 & ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p17]]]]]]
normalized: [~ [EG [~ [E [true U [[1<=p26 & ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p17]]] & [1<=p2 & ~ [EG [E [true U ~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]]]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [E [true U [[1<=p26 & ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p17]]] & [1<=p2 & ~ [EG [E [true U ~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]]]]]]]] U [~ [[[[~ [EG [~ [EX [[1<=p1 & 1<=p31]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [EX [[1<=p1 & 1<=p31]]] U [[1<=p3 & 1<=p9] & ~ [EX [[1<=p1 & 1<=p31]]]]]]] | ~ [EX [~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p16]]]]] | E [[1<=p2 & 1<=p20] U [1<=p1 & 1<=p11]]]] & ~ [E [true U [[1<=p26 & ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p17]]] & [1<=p2 & ~ [EG [E [true U ~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)

EG iterations: 0
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p26)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 58,813,402,884,028 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p20)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
.abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
.abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 54,409,301,006,723 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
.abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
...
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)

EG iterations: 0
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p26)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)

EG iterations: 0
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p26)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)

EG iterations: 0
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 4.661sec

checking: [~ [E [[A [A [[1<=p5 & 1<=p11] U [1<=p3 & 1<=p23]] U EF [[1<=p1 & 1<=p9]]] | E [[1<=p3 & 1<=p16] U EF [[1<=p6 & 1<=p11]]]] U [1<=p1 & 1<=p21]]] | EF [AG [EX [~ [A [[1<=p3 & 1<=p36] U [1<=p1 & 1<=p8]]]]]]]
normalized: [E [true U ~ [E [true U ~ [EX [~ [[~ [E [~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p8]] U [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p36]] & ~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p8]]]]] & ~ [EG [~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p8]]]]]]]]]]] | ~ [E [[E [[1<=p3 & 1<=p16] U E [true U [1<=p6 & 1<=p11]]] | [~ [EG [~ [E [true U [1<=p1 & 1<=p9]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [E [true U [1<=p1 & 1<=p9]]] U [~ [[~ [EG [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p23]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p23]] U [~ [[1<=p5 & 1<=p11]] & ~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p23]]]]]]] & ~ [E [true U [1<=p1 & 1<=p9]]]]]]]] U [1<=p1 & 1<=p21]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 54,409,301,006,723 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 58,813,402,884,028 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 10,584,851,471,870 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 54,409,301,006,723 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 54,409,301,006,723 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 58,813,402,884,028 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 10,584,858,378,770 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 35,905,489,609,834 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 35,905,489,609,834 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 35,905,489,609,834 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m13.235sec

checking: EX [[EF [AX [[E [[1<=p1 & 1<=p28] U [1<=p1 & 1<=p16]] & [[1<=p1 & 1<=p34] | [1<=p1 & 1<=p31]]]]] & [[AX [~ [E [[1<=p3 & 1<=p41] U [1<=p2 & 1<=p19]]]] | [~ [E [[1<=p1 & 1<=p35] U [1<=p3 & 1<=p31]]] & [[p3<=0 | p9<=0] & [p3<=0 | p34<=0]]]] & [[1<=p0 & 1<=p38] | [[p2<=0 | p23<=0] & [AG [[1<=p3 & 1<=p14]] | [1<=p1 & 1<=p24]]]]]]]
normalized: EX [[[[[[~ [E [true U ~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p14]]]] | [1<=p1 & 1<=p24]] & [p2<=0 | p23<=0]] | [1<=p0 & 1<=p38]] & [[[[p3<=0 | p34<=0] & [p3<=0 | p9<=0]] & ~ [E [[1<=p1 & 1<=p35] U [1<=p3 & 1<=p31]]]] | ~ [EX [E [[1<=p3 & 1<=p41] U [1<=p2 & 1<=p19]]]]]] & E [true U ~ [EX [~ [[[[1<=p1 & 1<=p31] | [1<=p1 & 1<=p34]] & E [[1<=p1 & 1<=p28] U [1<=p1 & 1<=p16]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p28)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p34)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
.abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
.abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p35)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (p9<=0)
states: 230,113,831,982,346 (14)
abstracting: (p3<=0)
states: 264,575,405,456,908 (14)
abstracting: (p34<=0)
states: 185,573,774,757,670 (14)
abstracting: (p3<=0)
states: 264,575,405,456,908 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p38)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (p23<=0)
states: 181,664,378,033,697 (14)
abstracting: (p2<=0)
states: 204,230,445,686,203 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m14.651sec

checking: E [~ [[[A [[1<=p3 & 1<=p25] U AF [[1<=p1 & 1<=p24]]] | [1<=p2 & 1<=p38]] & A [[[[1<=p0 & 1<=p39] | [1<=p3 & 1<=p41]] & EG [[1<=p0 & 1<=p42]]] U [A [[1<=p0 & 1<=p40] U [1<=p3 & 1<=p33]] | [[1<=p3 & 1<=p36] | [1<=p3 & 1<=p17]]]]]] U ~ [E [[EX [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p43]]] | [1<=p3 & 1<=p40]] U [AF [[1<=p1 & 1<=p42]] | EF [~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p33]]]]]]]
normalized: E [~ [[[~ [EG [~ [[[[1<=p3 & 1<=p17] | [1<=p3 & 1<=p36]] | [~ [EG [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p33]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p33]] U [~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p40]] & ~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p33]]]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[[[1<=p3 & 1<=p17] | [1<=p3 & 1<=p36]] | [~ [EG [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p33]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p33]] U [~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p40]] & ~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p33]]]]]]]] U [~ [[EG [[1<=p0 & 1<=p42]] & [[1<=p3 & 1<=p41] | [1<=p0 & 1<=p39]]]] & ~ [[[[1<=p3 & 1<=p17] | [1<=p3 & 1<=p36]] | [~ [EG [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p33]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p33]] U [~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p40]] & ~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p33]]]]]]]]]]]] & [[1<=p2 & 1<=p38] | [~ [EG [EG [~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p24]]]]] & ~ [E [EG [~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p24]]] U [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p25]] & EG [~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p24]]]]]]]]]] U ~ [E [[[1<=p3 & 1<=p40] | EX [~ [[1<=p3 & 1<=p43]]]] U [E [true U ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p33]]] | ~ [EG [~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p42]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p42)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p43)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
.abstracting: (1<=p40)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 80,292,667,272,857 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p38)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 80,292,687,302,866 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p40)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p39)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p42)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
...................
EG iterations: 19
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p40)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p40)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 19,947,734,439,062 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 98,949,358,231,399 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 102,858,754,955,372 (14)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 19,947,727,532,161 (13)
..
EG iterations: 2
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Szymanski-PT-a10-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 1.686sec

totally nodes used: 13682740 (1.4e+07)
number of garbage collections: 0
fire ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 719190935 185269738 904460673
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 62254930 4853934 16 1024MB
basic ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 46999016 11081792 58080808
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 11736507 5040709 12 192MB
unary ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 8 128MB
abstract ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 12 192MB
state nr cache: hits/miss/sum: 447351 121582 568933
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 120775 8267833 32 256MB
max state cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 8388608 32 256MB
uniqueHash elements/entry size/size: 67108864 4 256MB
0 55095268
1 10728066
2 1139818
3 103337
4 15275
5 5350
6 4878
7 4506
8 2462
9 1410
>= 10 8494

Total processing time: 1m32.845sec


BK_STOP 1679255270857

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
check for maximal unmarked siphon
ok
check for constant places
ok
check if there are places and transitions
ok
check if there are transitions without pre-places
ok
check if at least one transition is enabled in m0
ok
check if there are transitions that can never fire
ok


initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec

7272 7831 14390 13680 14251 8900
iterations count:607275 (2811), effective:16435 (76)

initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:1328 (6), effective:14 (0)

iterations count:598 (2), effective:14 (0)

iterations count:33534 (155), effective:406 (1)

iterations count:3250 (15), effective:21 (0)

iterations count:757 (3), effective:13 (0)

iterations count:265 (1), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:216 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:878 (4), effective:14 (0)

iterations count:651 (3), effective:19 (0)

iterations count:224 (1), effective:8 (0)

iterations count:48286 (223), effective:560 (2)

iterations count:454 (2), effective:11 (0)

iterations count:8757 (40), effective:110 (0)

iterations count:446 (2), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:46592 (215), effective:532 (2)

iterations count:5322 (24), effective:96 (0)

iterations count:446 (2), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:31263 (144), effective:355 (1)

iterations count:2145 (9), effective:13 (0)

iterations count:5346 (24), effective:93 (0)

iterations count:2145 (9), effective:13 (0)

iterations count:5346 (24), effective:93 (0)

iterations count:30202 (139), effective:428 (1)

iterations count:2145 (9), effective:13 (0)

iterations count:5346 (24), effective:93 (0)

iterations count:216 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:1351 (6), effective:8 (0)

iterations count:2102 (9), effective:20 (0)

iterations count:14698 (68), effective:216 (1)

iterations count:1351 (6), effective:8 (0)

iterations count:13566 (62), effective:174 (0)

iterations count:1351 (6), effective:8 (0)

iterations count:24489 (113), effective:356 (1)

iterations count:368 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:24489 (113), effective:356 (1)

iterations count:294 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:24489 (113), effective:356 (1)

iterations count:4181 (19), effective:38 (0)

iterations count:216 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:23944 (110), effective:362 (1)

iterations count:446 (2), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:31315 (144), effective:357 (1)

iterations count:1581 (7), effective:9 (0)

iterations count:42911 (198), effective:468 (2)

iterations count:1458 (6), effective:16 (0)

iterations count:1967 (9), effective:18 (0)

iterations count:446 (2), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:1398 (6), effective:14 (0)

iterations count:216 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:446 (2), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:265 (1), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:265 (1), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:265 (1), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:265 (1), effective:4 (0)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Szymanski-PT-a10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="marciexred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool marciexred"
echo " Input is Szymanski-PT-a10, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r490-tall-167912708600434"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Szymanski-PT-a10.tgz
mv Szymanski-PT-a10 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;