fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r481-tall-167912692500798
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of Marcie for TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
5449.035 4595.00 4078.00 0.00 TFFTFTFTFTTFFTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r481-tall-167912692500798.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool marcie
Input is TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 1
Run identifier is r481-tall-167912692500798
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 408K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Feb 25 17:53 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K Feb 25 17:53 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K Feb 25 17:53 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Feb 25 17:53 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Feb 25 17:22 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Feb 25 17:22 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Feb 25 17:22 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Feb 25 17:22 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Feb 25 17:54 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K Feb 25 17:54 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K Feb 25 17:53 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K Feb 25 17:53 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Feb 25 17:22 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Feb 25 17:22 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10 Mar 5 18:23 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K Mar 5 18:23 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1679868287613

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=marcie
BK_EXAMINATION=ReachabilityCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
ReachabilityCardinality PT
timeout --kill-after=10s --signal=SIGINT 1m for testing only

Marcie built on Linux at 2019-11-18.
A model checker for Generalized Stochastic Petri nets

authors: Alex Tovchigrechko (IDD package and CTL model checking)

Martin Schwarick (Symbolic numerical analysis and CSL model checking)

Christian Rohr (Simulative and approximative numerical model checking)

marcie@informatik.tu-cottbus.de

called as: /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../marcie/bin/marcie --net-file=model.pnml --mcc-file=ReachabilityCardinality.xml --memory=6 --mcc-mode

parse successfull
net created successfully

Net: TwoPhaseLocking_PT_nC00010vN
(NrP: 8 NrTr: 6 NrArc: 18)

parse formulas
formulas created successfully
place and transition orderings generation:0m 0.000sec

net check time: 0m 0.000sec

init dd package: 0m 2.839sec


RS generation: 0m 0.001sec


-> reachability set: #nodes 285 (2.8e+02) #states 624



starting MCC model checker
--------------------------

checking: AG [haveAandB<=2]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [haveAandB<=2]]]

abstracting: (haveAandB<=2)
states: 576
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.002sec

checking: AG [resB<=10]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [resB<=10]]]

abstracting: (resB<=10)
states: 624
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.000sec

checking: AG [3<=resB]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [3<=resB]]]

abstracting: (3<=resB)
states: 258
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.000sec

checking: EF [~ [[2<=haveA | 4<=haveA2]]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [[2<=haveA | 4<=haveA2]]]

abstracting: (4<=haveA2)
states: 31
abstracting: (2<=haveA)
states: 199
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.001sec

checking: EF [[~ [haveA2andB<=6] | 4<=haveB]]
normalized: E [true U [~ [haveA2andB<=6] | 4<=haveB]]

abstracting: (4<=haveB)
states: 147
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=6)
states: 624
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.000sec

checking: EF [~ [resA<=resB]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [resA<=resB]]

abstracting: (resA<=resB)
states: 498
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.001sec

checking: AG [[haveA2andB<=haveB | [~ [haveB<=resB] | Clients<=5]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[~ [haveB<=resB] | Clients<=5] | haveA2andB<=haveB]]]]

abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveB)
states: 507
abstracting: (Clients<=5)
states: 498
abstracting: (haveB<=resB)
states: 348
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.001sec

checking: AG [[haveA2<=resB | ~ [[[~ [haveA2andB<=haveA2] & Clients<=haveAandB] | haveB<=3]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[~ [[[~ [haveA2andB<=haveA2] & Clients<=haveAandB] | haveB<=3]] | haveA2<=resB]]]]

abstracting: (haveA2<=resB)
states: 503
abstracting: (haveB<=3)
states: 477
abstracting: (Clients<=haveAandB)
states: 66
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveA2)
states: 440
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.001sec

checking: EF [[[9<=haveB & haveB<=haveB] | [~ [[haveA2<=haveB | resA<=haveA2]] | [haveA2<=Clients | [[[~ [[~ [6<=resA] & ~ [4<=haveA]]] | 5<=haveA2andB] | [[[haveA2andB<=0 | 4<=haveA2andB] & [haveA<=10 | resB<=8]] & haveA2andB<=haveA2andB]] & Clients<=2]]]]]
normalized: E [true U [[[[[[[[haveA<=10 | resB<=8] & [haveA2andB<=0 | 4<=haveA2andB]] & haveA2andB<=haveA2andB] | [~ [[~ [4<=haveA] & ~ [6<=resA]]] | 5<=haveA2andB]] & Clients<=2] | haveA2<=Clients] | ~ [[haveA2<=haveB | resA<=haveA2]]] | [9<=haveB & haveB<=haveB]]]

abstracting: (haveB<=haveB)
states: 624
abstracting: (9<=haveB)
states: 0
abstracting: (resA<=haveA2)
states: 382
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveB)
states: 498
abstracting: (haveA2<=Clients)
states: 561
abstracting: (Clients<=2)
states: 141
abstracting: (5<=haveA2andB)
states: 2
abstracting: (6<=resA)
states: 0
abstracting: (4<=haveA)
states: 31
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveA2andB)
states: 624
abstracting: (4<=haveA2andB)
states: 13
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=0)
states: 316
abstracting: (resB<=8)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveA<=10)
states: 624
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.001sec

checking: AG [[[4<=resA | 1<=Clients] | [[~ [[~ [haveAandB<=haveA] & haveAandB<=haveA2andB]] & [~ [[resB<=resA | [~ [[haveA2<=haveA2andB | haveA<=haveA]] & [[haveB<=Clients & haveA<=haveA2andB] & ~ [haveA2andB<=haveA2]]]]] | ~ [1<=Clients]]] & 1<=resB]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[[[~ [1<=Clients] | ~ [[[[~ [haveA2andB<=haveA2] & [haveB<=Clients & haveA<=haveA2andB]] & ~ [[haveA2<=haveA2andB | haveA<=haveA]]] | resB<=resA]]] & ~ [[haveAandB<=haveA2andB & ~ [haveAandB<=haveA]]]] & 1<=resB] | [4<=resA | 1<=Clients]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=Clients)
states: 603
abstracting: (4<=resA)
states: 33
abstracting: (1<=resB)
states: 504
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveA)
states: 440
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveA2andB)
states: 412
abstracting: (resB<=resA)
states: 246
abstracting: (haveA<=haveA)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveA2andB)
states: 359
abstracting: (haveA<=haveA2andB)
states: 359
abstracting: (haveB<=Clients)
states: 453
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveA2)
states: 440
abstracting: (1<=Clients)
states: 603
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.002sec

checking: EF [[[~ [[~ [8<=haveAandB] & [[[[[haveAandB<=haveA2 & resA<=10] & ~ [haveAandB<=1]] & haveB<=4] & resA<=3] & ~ [haveA2<=resA]]]] & ~ [[[~ [haveB<=Clients] | [haveA<=7 & [[10<=haveA2 & Clients<=haveB] | ~ [haveA2andB<=haveAandB]]]] & [[[[haveA2<=resB | haveB<=5] | [6<=haveA & haveB<=resB]] | haveAandB<=4] & 10<=haveAandB]]]] & Clients<=4]]
normalized: E [true U [[~ [[[[[[6<=haveA & haveB<=resB] | [haveA2<=resB | haveB<=5]] | haveAandB<=4] & 10<=haveAandB] & [[[~ [haveA2andB<=haveAandB] | [10<=haveA2 & Clients<=haveB]] & haveA<=7] | ~ [haveB<=Clients]]]] & ~ [[[~ [haveA2<=resA] & [[[~ [haveAandB<=1] & [haveAandB<=haveA2 & resA<=10]] & haveB<=4] & resA<=3]] & ~ [8<=haveAandB]]]] & Clients<=4]]

abstracting: (Clients<=4)
states: 372
abstracting: (8<=haveAandB)
states: 0
abstracting: (resA<=3)
states: 591
abstracting: (haveB<=4)
states: 558
abstracting: (resA<=10)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveA2)
states: 440
abstracting: (haveAandB<=1)
states: 491
abstracting: (haveA2<=resA)
states: 387
abstracting: (haveB<=Clients)
states: 453
abstracting: (haveA<=7)
states: 624
abstracting: (Clients<=haveB)
states: 212
abstracting: (10<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveAandB)
states: 412
abstracting: (10<=haveAandB)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveAandB<=4)
states: 622
abstracting: (haveB<=5)
states: 609
abstracting: (haveA2<=resB)
states: 503
abstracting: (haveB<=resB)
states: 348
abstracting: (6<=haveA)
states: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.002sec

checking: AG [[~ [[[[~ [5<=haveA2] & [resA<=haveB & [[Clients<=haveA | haveA2<=haveA2] | [haveB<=Clients | resA<=4]]]] & [[[[haveA2<=resA & haveB<=haveA] & [haveA2andB<=resB & resB<=0]] | [7<=haveA2 | [haveAandB<=haveA2andB | haveAandB<=haveAandB]]] & haveA2<=0]] & [haveAandB<=10 | [[[9<=haveA2andB & [resA<=2 | Clients<=8]] & ~ [[Clients<=5 | haveA<=resA]]] & [Clients<=9 | resB<=haveA]]]]] | resB<=0]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[~ [[[[[Clients<=9 | resB<=haveA] & [~ [[Clients<=5 | haveA<=resA]] & [[resA<=2 | Clients<=8] & 9<=haveA2andB]]] | haveAandB<=10] & [[[[[haveAandB<=haveA2andB | haveAandB<=haveAandB] | 7<=haveA2] | [[haveA2andB<=resB & resB<=0] & [haveA2<=resA & haveB<=haveA]]] & haveA2<=0] & [[[[haveB<=Clients | resA<=4] | [Clients<=haveA | haveA2<=haveA2]] & resA<=haveB] & ~ [5<=haveA2]]]]] | resB<=0]]]]

abstracting: (resB<=0)
states: 120
abstracting: (5<=haveA2)
states: 6
abstracting: (resA<=haveB)
states: 498
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveA2)
states: 624
abstracting: (Clients<=haveA)
states: 112
abstracting: (resA<=4)
states: 617
abstracting: (haveB<=Clients)
states: 453
abstracting: (haveA2<=0)
states: 251
abstracting: (haveB<=haveA)
states: 252
abstracting: (haveA2<=resA)
states: 387
abstracting: (resB<=0)
states: 120
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=resB)
states: 507
abstracting: (7<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveAandB)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveA2andB)
states: 412
abstracting: (haveAandB<=10)
states: 624
abstracting: (9<=haveA2andB)
states: 0
abstracting: (Clients<=8)
states: 618
abstracting: (resA<=2)
states: 531
abstracting: (haveA<=resA)
states: 387
abstracting: (Clients<=5)
states: 498
abstracting: (resB<=haveA)
states: 246
abstracting: (Clients<=9)
states: 623
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.003sec

checking: AG [[[haveAandB<=haveAandB | [haveAandB<=2 | [~ [[[Clients<=resA | [resA<=10 | haveB<=resB]] | 8<=haveA]] | [~ [[haveA2andB<=3 | [haveA<=7 & [haveA<=Clients & 2<=Clients]]]] & [[[~ [4<=haveB] & [haveA2andB<=4 | haveA2<=haveA2]] | [~ [haveA<=2] & [haveA<=haveA & resB<=9]]] & haveA<=6]]]]] & [[[~ [[~ [haveA2andB<=7] | ~ [[haveAandB<=resA | 10<=haveA2]]]] | ~ [[[haveA2<=0 | ~ [resA<=7]] | resB<=haveA2]]] | [haveAandB<=resA & ~ [3<=haveA]]] | haveAandB<=haveB]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[[[~ [3<=haveA] & haveAandB<=resA] | [~ [[[~ [resA<=7] | haveA2<=0] | resB<=haveA2]] | ~ [[~ [[haveAandB<=resA | 10<=haveA2]] | ~ [haveA2andB<=7]]]]] | haveAandB<=haveB] & [[[[[[[[haveA<=haveA & resB<=9] & ~ [haveA<=2]] | [[haveA2andB<=4 | haveA2<=haveA2] & ~ [4<=haveB]]] & haveA<=6] & ~ [[[[haveA<=Clients & 2<=Clients] & haveA<=7] | haveA2andB<=3]]] | ~ [[[[resA<=10 | haveB<=resB] | Clients<=resA] | 8<=haveA]]] | haveAandB<=2] | haveAandB<=haveAandB]]]]]

abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveAandB)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveAandB<=2)
states: 576
abstracting: (8<=haveA)
states: 0
abstracting: (Clients<=resA)
states: 66
abstracting: (haveB<=resB)
states: 348
abstracting: (resA<=10)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=3)
states: 611
abstracting: (haveA<=7)
states: 624
abstracting: (2<=Clients)
states: 558
abstracting: (haveA<=Clients)
states: 561
abstracting: (haveA<=6)
states: 624
abstracting: (4<=haveB)
states: 147
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveA2)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=4)
states: 622
abstracting: (haveA<=2)
states: 534
abstracting: (resB<=9)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveA<=haveA)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveB)
states: 507
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=7)
states: 624
abstracting: (10<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveAandB<=resA)
states: 440
abstracting: (resB<=haveA2)
states: 246
abstracting: (haveA2<=0)
states: 251
abstracting: (resA<=7)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveAandB<=resA)
states: 440
abstracting: (3<=haveA)
states: 90
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.003sec

checking: AG [[[[[~ [6<=haveA2] | 4<=haveA2andB] & [resA<=9 | [[[[[haveB<=haveB | haveA2andB<=haveA2andB] & 4<=haveAandB] | [10<=haveA2 & ~ [haveA2andB<=6]]] & [[[resB<=haveA2andB | 1<=resA] | [Clients<=6 | resB<=0]] | ~ [[resA<=0 & haveA2<=Clients]]]] | ~ [[7<=haveAandB & [[2<=haveA2 & haveA2andB<=7] & [Clients<=haveA2 | haveA<=haveB]]]]]]] & [5<=Clients | [[[[~ [[9<=haveA2 | Clients<=8]] & [[10<=haveA & 5<=Clients] & haveA2<=haveA2andB]] & ~ [resA<=haveA]] | [[~ [Clients<=9] & [~ [5<=resB] | [7<=resA & 1<=resA]]] & ~ [4<=Clients]]] & resB<=haveA2andB]]] | 9<=resB]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[[[[[~ [4<=Clients] & [[[7<=resA & 1<=resA] | ~ [5<=resB]] & ~ [Clients<=9]]] | [~ [resA<=haveA] & [[[10<=haveA & 5<=Clients] & haveA2<=haveA2andB] & ~ [[9<=haveA2 | Clients<=8]]]]] & resB<=haveA2andB] | 5<=Clients] & [[[~ [[[[Clients<=haveA2 | haveA<=haveB] & [2<=haveA2 & haveA2andB<=7]] & 7<=haveAandB]] | [[~ [[resA<=0 & haveA2<=Clients]] | [[Clients<=6 | resB<=0] | [resB<=haveA2andB | 1<=resA]]] & [[~ [haveA2andB<=6] & 10<=haveA2] | [[haveB<=haveB | haveA2andB<=haveA2andB] & 4<=haveAandB]]]] | resA<=9] & [~ [6<=haveA2] | 4<=haveA2andB]]] | 9<=resB]]]]

abstracting: (9<=resB)
states: 0
abstracting: (4<=haveA2andB)
states: 13
abstracting: (6<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (resA<=9)
states: 624
abstracting: (4<=haveAandB)
states: 13
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveA2andB)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveB<=haveB)
states: 624
abstracting: (10<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=6)
states: 624
abstracting: (1<=resA)
states: 378
abstracting: (resB<=haveA2andB)
states: 227
abstracting: (resB<=0)
states: 120
abstracting: (Clients<=6)
states: 568
abstracting: (haveA2<=Clients)
states: 561
abstracting: (resA<=0)
states: 246
abstracting: (7<=haveAandB)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=7)
states: 624
abstracting: (2<=haveA2)
states: 199
abstracting: (haveA<=haveB)
states: 498
abstracting: (Clients<=haveA2)
states: 112
abstracting: (5<=Clients)
states: 252
abstracting: (resB<=haveA2andB)
states: 227
abstracting: (Clients<=8)
states: 618
abstracting: (9<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveA2andB)
states: 359
abstracting: (5<=Clients)
states: 252
abstracting: (10<=haveA)
states: 0
abstracting: (resA<=haveA)
states: 382
abstracting: (Clients<=9)
states: 623
abstracting: (5<=resB)
states: 72
abstracting: (1<=resA)
states: 378
abstracting: (7<=resA)
states: 0
abstracting: (4<=Clients)
states: 378
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.002sec

checking: EF [~ [[[[~ [haveAandB<=9] | [2<=resB | [haveA2<=5 & [[haveA<=10 & [Clients<=2 & resA<=haveA2andB]] & [[haveA<=5 | 7<=resA] & [1<=resB | haveA2<=haveAandB]]]]]] | [[~ [resB<=resB] & haveA<=2] | [[~ [[2<=haveA2andB & [resB<=7 | haveAandB<=6]]] & ~ [resA<=5]] & [[~ [haveA2<=haveB] | [~ [resB<=haveA2andB] & [Clients<=resA & 5<=resA]]] | [~ [[resB<=8 | 10<=haveA2andB]] & ~ [resB<=haveA2andB]]]]]] | ~ [[[haveA<=resB & [~ [haveA2<=0] & [[[haveB<=haveA & Clients<=Clients] | ~ [resB<=9]] & [haveAandB<=9 & ~ [haveAandB<=3]]]]] | ~ [[~ [[~ [5<=resA] | ~ [haveA2<=Clients]]] & haveA2<=Clients]]]]]]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [[~ [[~ [[~ [[~ [haveA2<=Clients] | ~ [5<=resA]]] & haveA2<=Clients]] | [[[[~ [haveAandB<=3] & haveAandB<=9] & [~ [resB<=9] | [haveB<=haveA & Clients<=Clients]]] & ~ [haveA2<=0]] & haveA<=resB]]] | [[[[[~ [resB<=haveA2andB] & ~ [[resB<=8 | 10<=haveA2andB]]] | [[[Clients<=resA & 5<=resA] & ~ [resB<=haveA2andB]] | ~ [haveA2<=haveB]]] & [~ [resA<=5] & ~ [[[resB<=7 | haveAandB<=6] & 2<=haveA2andB]]]] | [~ [resB<=resB] & haveA<=2]] | [[[[[[1<=resB | haveA2<=haveAandB] & [haveA<=5 | 7<=resA]] & [[Clients<=2 & resA<=haveA2andB] & haveA<=10]] & haveA2<=5] | 2<=resB] | ~ [haveAandB<=9]]]]]]

abstracting: (haveAandB<=9)
states: 624
abstracting: (2<=resB)
states: 378
abstracting: (haveA2<=5)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveA<=10)
states: 624
abstracting: (resA<=haveA2andB)
states: 354
abstracting: (Clients<=2)
states: 141
abstracting: (7<=resA)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA<=5)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveAandB)
states: 359
abstracting: (1<=resB)
states: 504
abstracting: (haveA<=2)
states: 534
abstracting: (resB<=resB)
states: 624
abstracting: (2<=haveA2andB)
states: 133
abstracting: (haveAandB<=6)
states: 624
abstracting: (resB<=7)
states: 624
abstracting: (resA<=5)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveB)
states: 498
abstracting: (resB<=haveA2andB)
states: 227
abstracting: (5<=resA)
states: 7
abstracting: (Clients<=resA)
states: 66
abstracting: (10<=haveA2andB)
states: 0
abstracting: (resB<=8)
states: 624
abstracting: (resB<=haveA2andB)
states: 227
abstracting: (haveA<=resB)
states: 503
abstracting: (haveA2<=0)
states: 251
abstracting: (Clients<=Clients)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveB<=haveA)
states: 252
abstracting: (resB<=9)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveAandB<=9)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveAandB<=3)
states: 611
abstracting: (haveA2<=Clients)
states: 561
abstracting: (5<=resA)
states: 7
abstracting: (haveA2<=Clients)
states: 561
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.002sec

checking: AG [[[[[haveA2andB<=haveA2andB & 2<=resA] & 9<=resA] | [9<=haveA2andB & ~ [[[4<=haveA2andB | ~ [haveA2<=resB]] & ~ [Clients<=9]]]]] | [[~ [[[[haveAandB<=7 & ~ [[haveA2andB<=haveA | 10<=haveA2]]] | [2<=haveB | ~ [Clients<=8]]] & [4<=Clients | [[[haveB<=haveA2andB | haveAandB<=8] & [haveA<=1 & haveA2andB<=5]] | [~ [3<=resB] | [4<=haveA2andB | haveA<=0]]]]]] | ~ [3<=resB]] & [[[~ [haveB<=5] & [haveAandB<=resA & Clients<=9]] & [~ [[[Clients<=7 & Clients<=3] & [haveA2<=0 | resA<=haveB]]] | [[haveAandB<=haveA2 | 2<=haveA2] | [haveA2andB<=10 & ~ [haveB<=2]]]]] | [[[~ [resA<=10] | 8<=haveAandB] & [[~ [[3<=haveB & resA<=resB]] | ~ [[haveA<=1 & 1<=Clients]]] | [[[resB<=haveA2 | resA<=4] | Clients<=Clients] | [[4<=haveB & haveA2<=haveAandB] | haveA<=5]]]] & ~ [[~ [[[haveA<=7 | 7<=resA] | [haveA2<=0 & resA<=haveA2]]] & ~ [8<=resB]]]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[[[~ [[~ [8<=resB] & ~ [[[haveA2<=0 & resA<=haveA2] | [haveA<=7 | 7<=resA]]]]] & [[[[[4<=haveB & haveA2<=haveAandB] | haveA<=5] | [[resB<=haveA2 | resA<=4] | Clients<=Clients]] | [~ [[haveA<=1 & 1<=Clients]] | ~ [[3<=haveB & resA<=resB]]]] & [~ [resA<=10] | 8<=haveAandB]]] | [[[[~ [haveB<=2] & haveA2andB<=10] | [haveAandB<=haveA2 | 2<=haveA2]] | ~ [[[haveA2<=0 | resA<=haveB] & [Clients<=7 & Clients<=3]]]] & [[haveAandB<=resA & Clients<=9] & ~ [haveB<=5]]]] & [~ [3<=resB] | ~ [[[[[[4<=haveA2andB | haveA<=0] | ~ [3<=resB]] | [[haveA<=1 & haveA2andB<=5] & [haveB<=haveA2andB | haveAandB<=8]]] | 4<=Clients] & [[~ [Clients<=8] | 2<=haveB] | [~ [[haveA2andB<=haveA | 10<=haveA2]] & haveAandB<=7]]]]]] | [[~ [[~ [Clients<=9] & [~ [haveA2<=resB] | 4<=haveA2andB]]] & 9<=haveA2andB] | [[haveA2andB<=haveA2andB & 2<=resA] & 9<=resA]]]]]]

abstracting: (9<=resA)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=resA)
states: 203
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveA2andB)
states: 624
abstracting: (9<=haveA2andB)
states: 0
abstracting: (4<=haveA2andB)
states: 13
abstracting: (haveA2<=resB)
states: 503
abstracting: (Clients<=9)
states: 623
abstracting: (haveAandB<=7)
states: 624
abstracting: (10<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveA)
states: 440
abstracting: (2<=haveB)
states: 372
abstracting: (Clients<=8)
states: 618
abstracting: (4<=Clients)
states: 378
abstracting: (haveAandB<=8)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveB<=haveA2andB)
states: 233
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=5)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveA<=1)
states: 425
abstracting: (3<=resB)
states: 258
abstracting: (haveA<=0)
states: 251
abstracting: (4<=haveA2andB)
states: 13
abstracting: (3<=resB)
states: 258
abstracting: (haveB<=5)
states: 609
abstracting: (Clients<=9)
states: 623
abstracting: (haveAandB<=resA)
states: 440
abstracting: (Clients<=3)
states: 246
abstracting: (Clients<=7)
states: 603
abstracting: (resA<=haveB)
states: 498
abstracting: (haveA2<=0)
states: 251
abstracting: (2<=haveA2)
states: 199
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveA2)
states: 440
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=10)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveB<=2)
states: 372
abstracting: (8<=haveAandB)
states: 0
abstracting: (resA<=10)
states: 624
abstracting: (resA<=resB)
states: 498
abstracting: (3<=haveB)
states: 252
abstracting: (1<=Clients)
states: 603
abstracting: (haveA<=1)
states: 425
abstracting: (Clients<=Clients)
states: 624
abstracting: (resA<=4)
states: 617
abstracting: (resB<=haveA2)
states: 246
abstracting: (haveA<=5)
states: 624
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveAandB)
states: 359
abstracting: (4<=haveB)
states: 147
abstracting: (7<=resA)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA<=7)
states: 624
abstracting: (resA<=haveA2)
states: 382
abstracting: (haveA2<=0)
states: 251
abstracting: (8<=resB)
states: 0
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN-ReachabilityCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.002sec

totally nodes used: 5991 (6.0e+03)
number of garbage collections: 0
fire ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 16967 9315 26282
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 11693 67097171 16 1024MB
basic ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 22984 29951 52935
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 41406 16735810 12 192MB
unary ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 8 128MB
abstract ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 12 192MB
state nr cache: hits/miss/sum: 4792 2465 7257
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 2465 8386143 32 256MB
max state cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 8388608 32 256MB
uniqueHash elements/entry size/size: 67108864 4 256MB
0 67103470
1 5174
2 151
3 21
4 9
5 3
6 4
7 4
8 1
9 7
>= 10 20

Total processing time: 0m 4.544sec


BK_STOP 1679868292208

--------------------
content from stderr:

check for maximal unmarked siphon
ok
check for constant places
ok
check if there are places and transitions
ok
check if there are transitions without pre-places
ok
check if at least one transition is enabled in m0
ok
check if there are transitions that can never fire
ok


initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:131 (21), effective:40 (6)

initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:72 (12), effective:23 (3)

iterations count:26 (4), effective:12 (2)

iterations count:67 (11), effective:21 (3)

iterations count:62 (10), effective:20 (3)

iterations count:52 (8), effective:20 (3)

iterations count:135 (22), effective:39 (6)

iterations count:97 (16), effective:33 (5)

iterations count:12 (2), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:89 (14), effective:32 (5)

iterations count:35 (5), effective:13 (2)

iterations count:42 (7), effective:14 (2)

iterations count:96 (16), effective:32 (5)

iterations count:30 (5), effective:10 (1)

iterations count:45 (7), effective:19 (3)

iterations count:11 (1), effective:1 (0)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="marcie"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool marcie"
echo " Input is TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 1"
echo " Run identifier is r481-tall-167912692500798"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN.tgz
mv TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00010vN execution
cd execution
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME ReachabilityCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;