Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r421-tajo-167905975200410.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r421-tajo-167905975200410
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 868K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Feb 26 10:26 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K Feb 26 10:26 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K Feb 26 10:25 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K Feb 26 10:25 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Feb 25 17:05 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Feb 25 17:05 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Feb 25 17:05 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 17:05 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Feb 26 10:27 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 120K Feb 26 10:27 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Feb 26 10:27 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K Feb 26 10:27 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Feb 25 17:05 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 17:05 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 450K Mar 5 18:23 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1679178590395

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-18 22:29:52] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-18 22:29:52] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-18 22:29:52] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 106 ms
[2023-03-18 22:29:52] [INFO ] Transformed 1295 places.
[2023-03-18 22:29:52] [INFO ] Transformed 749 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:29:52] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1295 places and 749 transitions and 2996 arcs in 185 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1036 places in 7 ms
Reduce places removed 1036 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 259 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 259/259 places, 749/749 transitions.
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 240 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 240 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 257 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 242 transition count 509
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 287 place count 212 transition count 461
Iterating global reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 212 transition count 461
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 322 place count 212 transition count 456
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 335 place count 199 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 199 transition count 443
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 199 transition count 437
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 362 place count 191 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 370 place count 191 transition count 429
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 191 transition count 426
Applied a total of 373 rules in 53 ms. Remains 191 /259 variables (removed 68) and now considering 426/749 (removed 323) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 426 rows 191 cols
[2023-03-18 22:29:52] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 19 ms
[2023-03-18 22:29:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 303 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:29:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:29:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 295 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:29:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 747 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1076 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:29:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:29:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 186 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 191/259 places, 426/749 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1317 ms. Remains : 191/259 places, 426/749 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 191 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-18 22:29:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2023-03-18 22:29:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2023-03-18 22:29:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 426 transitions.
Support contains 61 out of 191 places (down from 62) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2235 resets, run finished after 609 ms. (steps per millisecond=16 ) properties (out of 61) seen :3
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 58) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 58) seen :3
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 33 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 94 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 32 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 94 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 115 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 111 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 90 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 34 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 112 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 34 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 55 properties.
[2023-03-18 22:29:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:29:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-18 22:29:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2023-03-18 22:29:56] [INFO ] After 410ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:54
[2023-03-18 22:29:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-18 22:29:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2023-03-18 22:29:59] [INFO ] After 2468ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :6 sat :49
[2023-03-18 22:29:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 295 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:30:04] [INFO ] After 4806ms SMT Verify possible using 295 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :6 sat :49
[2023-03-18 22:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-18 22:30:05] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 203 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-18 22:30:07] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 113 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:10] [INFO ] After 11035ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :6 sat :49
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 4382 ms.
[2023-03-18 22:30:14] [INFO ] After 18262ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :6 sat :49
Fused 55 Parikh solutions to 49 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 658 ms.
Support contains 45 out of 191 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 722 edges and 191 vertex of which 190 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 190 transition count 424
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 185 transition count 415
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 185 transition count 415
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 185 transition count 412
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 182 transition count 409
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 182 transition count 409
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 182 transition count 408
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 179 transition count 403
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 179 transition count 403
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 179 transition count 386
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 178 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 178 transition count 385
Applied a total of 48 rules in 57 ms. Remains 178 /191 variables (removed 13) and now considering 385/426 (removed 41) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 178/191 places, 385/426 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2240 resets, run finished after 277 ms. (steps per millisecond=36 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 59 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 88 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 62 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 54 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 46) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 364554 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=121 ) properties seen :{0=1, 1=1, 2=1, 3=1, 4=1, 5=1, 6=1, 8=1, 9=1, 10=1, 11=1, 12=1, 13=1, 14=1, 15=1, 16=1, 17=1, 18=1, 19=1, 20=1, 21=1, 22=1, 23=1, 24=1, 25=1, 26=1, 27=1, 28=1, 29=1, 30=1, 31=1, 33=1, 34=1, 36=1, 37=1, 39=1, 40=1, 41=1, 42=1, 43=1, 44=1, 45=1}
Probabilistic random walk after 364554 steps, saw 134726 distinct states, run finished after 3002 ms. (steps per millisecond=121 ) properties seen :42
Running SMT prover for 4 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 178 cols
[2023-03-18 22:30:19] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-18 22:30:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-18 22:30:19] [INFO ] After 238ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:4
[2023-03-18 22:30:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-18 22:30:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-18 22:30:19] [INFO ] After 214ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
[2023-03-18 22:30:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 261 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:30:20] [INFO ] After 250ms SMT Verify possible using 261 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
[2023-03-18 22:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-18 22:30:20] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 92 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:20] [INFO ] After 685ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 470 ms.
[2023-03-18 22:30:20] [INFO ] After 1461ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 50 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 178 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 385/385 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 149 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 149 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 149 transition count 180
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 125 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 125 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 125 transition count 144
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 111 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 111 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 111 transition count 121
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 107 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 107 transition count 116
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 103 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 103 transition count 112
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 100 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 100 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 100 transition count 107
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 97 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 97 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 96 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 96 transition count 103
Applied a total of 188 rules in 47 ms. Remains 96 /178 variables (removed 82) and now considering 103/385 (removed 282) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 48 ms. Remains : 96/178 places, 103/385 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2247 resets, run finished after 172 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 475 resets, run finished after 57 ms. (steps per millisecond=175 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 483 resets, run finished after 62 ms. (steps per millisecond=161 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 489 resets, run finished after 61 ms. (steps per millisecond=163 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 481 resets, run finished after 61 ms. (steps per millisecond=163 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 52209 states, properties seen :1
Probabilistic random walk after 130228 steps, saw 52209 distinct states, run finished after 827 ms. (steps per millisecond=157 ) properties seen :1
Explored full state space saw : 52209 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 130228 steps, saw 52209 distinct states, run finished after 602 ms. (steps per millisecond=216 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 9 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-18 22:30:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:22] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2023-03-18 22:30:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 426 transitions.
Support contains 48 out of 191 places (down from 50) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 44 stabilizing places and 73 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 794 edges and 191 vertex of which 190 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 158 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 158 transition count 247
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 158 transition count 243
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 132 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 132 transition count 214
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 132 transition count 204
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 115 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 115 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 24 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 24 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 115 transition count 162
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 111 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 111 transition count 157
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 200 place count 109 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 109 transition count 155
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 107 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 107 transition count 152
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 105 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 105 transition count 150
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 212 place count 103 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 103 transition count 148
Applied a total of 214 rules in 20 ms. Remains 103 /191 variables (removed 88) and now considering 148/426 (removed 278) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 103 cols
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 80 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 203 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 61 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 103/191 places, 148/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 287 ms. Remains : 103/191 places, 148/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15414819491030846541.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11862139540296301201.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15414819491030846541.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11862139540296301201.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,100255,1.23058,49432,2,3529,5,204242,6,0,560,64522,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1192>=1))) * (A(EG(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1197>=1)))) U AF((((s1>=1)&&(l1189>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l959>=1))))) + ((EX(((s1<1)||(l9...214
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((EY(Init) * E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l1192>=1)))) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((((s1>=1)&&(l1189>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l959>=1)))))...477
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t17, t21, t28, t29, t40, t41, t42, t43, t49, t51, t54, t59, t62, t64, t74, t83, t84, t85,...493
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/0/146
(forward)formula 0,1,10.2552,264076,1,0,693,1.31475e+06,345,364,4012,746100,913
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 155 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 155 transition count 197
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 155 transition count 192
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 126 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 126 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 126 transition count 147
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 107 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 107 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 107 transition count 117
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 100 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 100 transition count 109
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 215 place count 95 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 95 transition count 104
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 223 place count 92 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 92 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 92 transition count 98
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 89 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 89 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 235 place count 88 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 88 transition count 94
Applied a total of 236 rules in 31 ms. Remains 88 /191 variables (removed 103) and now considering 94/426 (removed 332) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 88 cols
[2023-03-18 22:30:33] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:30:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:30:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 201 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:30:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 74 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/191 places, 94/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 309 ms. Remains : 88/191 places, 94/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3942758974058081441.gal : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16987757159592323406.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3942758974058081441.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16987757159592323406.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,58391,0.225729,10476,2,2470,5,26633,6,0,446,17960,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(AF(E(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l213>=1))) U (((s1>=1)&&(l77>=1))&&(l953>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(EG(!(E(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l213>=1))) U (((s1>=1)&&(l77>=1))&&(l953>=1))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t12, t13, t29, t30, t42, t43, t48, t61, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t78, t81,...299
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.11747,62228,1,0,409,318921,221,214,3069,216283,463
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 157 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 157 transition count 223
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 157 transition count 220
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 130 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 130 transition count 190
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 130 transition count 179
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 113 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 113 transition count 161
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 113 transition count 144
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 108 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 108 transition count 138
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 104 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 104 transition count 134
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 102 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 102 transition count 132
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 210 place count 101 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 101 transition count 131
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 212 place count 100 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 100 transition count 130
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 99 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 99 transition count 128
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 98 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 98 transition count 127
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 97 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 97 transition count 126
Applied a total of 219 rules in 25 ms. Remains 97 /191 variables (removed 94) and now considering 126/426 (removed 300) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 97 cols
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 62 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 74 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/191 places, 126/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 306 ms. Remains : 97/191 places, 126/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8582073528217559663.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2239035669007911972.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8582073528217559663.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2239035669007911972.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,99227,0.578864,25504,2,3006,5,93270,6,0,514,38880,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((AF(((s1<1)||(l1186<1))) + EX(((s1>=1)&&(l351>=1)))) + ((s1<1)||(l1203<1)))) + EG(((s1<1)||(l1196<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,((!(EG(!(((s1<1)||(l1186<1))))) + EX(((s1>=1)&&(l351>=1)))) + ((s1<1)||(l1203<1))))] != FALSE + [Fwd...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t36, t38, t41, t42, t43, t44, t50, t52, t56, t57, t71, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t85, t86,...359
(forward)formula 0,1,2.31143,56536,1,0,282,215754,277,117,3539,121396,351
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 160 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 160 transition count 226
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 160 transition count 224
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 133 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 133 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 133 transition count 183
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 116 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 116 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 116 transition count 151
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 181 place count 112 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 112 transition count 147
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 109 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 109 transition count 144
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 193 place count 107 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 107 transition count 141
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 106 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 106 transition count 140
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 198 place count 105 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 105 transition count 139
Applied a total of 199 rules in 57 ms. Remains 105 /191 variables (removed 86) and now considering 139/426 (removed 287) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 105 cols
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 70 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 254 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 57 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/191 places, 139/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 382 ms. Remains : 105/191 places, 139/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9544621480761006719.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14749894075744551179.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9544621480761006719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14749894075744551179.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,108503,0.78298,26700,2,3938,5,88628,6,0,559,40550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(((p31<1)||(l0<1))) + AG((((A(((s1>=1)&&(l1195>=1)) U !(((s1<1)||(l1196<1)))) * ((p59<1)||(l0<1))) * ((s1<1)||(l1209<1))) + E(AG(((...225
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U ((p31<1)||(l0<1))) + !(E(TRUE U !((((!((E(!(!(((s1<1)||(l1196<1)))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l1195>=...371
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t13, t19, t23, t26, t27, t28, t30, t48, t49, t50, t51, t57, t60, t64, t65, t80, t90, t91,...415
(forward)formula 0,1,4.44368,122236,1,0,486,546801,320,208,3966,346251,599
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 157 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 157 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 157 transition count 208
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 129 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 129 transition count 177
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 129 transition count 164
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 111 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 111 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 111 transition count 132
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 105 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 105 transition count 125
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 101 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 101 transition count 121
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 98 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 98 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 98 transition count 115
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 221 place count 95 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 95 transition count 112
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 226 place count 93 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 93 transition count 110
Applied a total of 228 rules in 25 ms. Remains 93 /191 variables (removed 98) and now considering 110/426 (removed 316) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 93 cols
[2023-03-18 22:30:43] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 216 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 61 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/191 places, 110/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 303 ms. Remains : 93/191 places, 110/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3590167893748635362.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5772521299491979613.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3590167893748635362.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5772521299491979613.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,97969,0.22483,14288,2,3088,5,38851,6,0,482,23801,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(AG((EF(((s1>=1)&&(l164>=1))) * AX(((s1>=1)&&(l1198>=1)))))) U (EX(((s1>=1)&&(l34>=1))) * EF(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1198>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l34>=1))) * E(TRUE U EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1198>=1))))))))) * !(E(!((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l34>...375
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t11, t19, t23, t27, t28, t32, t34, t45, t46, t47, t57, t58, t68, t76, t83, t84, t85, ...335
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,4.48047,134204,1,0,592,725413,252,310,3337,510915,677
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 154 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 154 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 154 transition count 191
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 124 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 124 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 124 transition count 145
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 104 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 104 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 104 transition count 113
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 97 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 97 transition count 105
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 222 place count 91 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 91 transition count 99
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 86 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 86 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 86 transition count 91
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 82 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 82 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 80 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 80 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 253 place count 79 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 79 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 78 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 78 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 257 place count 77 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 77 transition count 81
Applied a total of 258 rules in 18 ms. Remains 77 /191 variables (removed 114) and now considering 81/426 (removed 345) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2023-03-18 22:30:48] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:30:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 209 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:30:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 51 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/191 places, 81/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 280 ms. Remains : 77/191 places, 81/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8799407562474523892.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8244334049544417714.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8799407562474523892.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8244334049544417714.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,52143,0.26784,12744,2,2284,5,34925,6,0,389,19677,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t52, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t69, t70, t73, t74, t76, t77, t78, t79, t80, In...250
(forward)formula 0,0,1.48963,46704,1,0,543,199531,183,316,2579,176036,456
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 160 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 160 transition count 240
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 160 transition count 235
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 138 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 138 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 138 transition count 205
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 122 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 122 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 19 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 19 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 122 transition count 168
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 173 place count 117 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 117 transition count 161
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 181 place count 114 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 114 transition count 158
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 111 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 111 transition count 154
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 111 transition count 150
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 197 place count 108 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 108 transition count 147
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 106 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 106 transition count 145
Applied a total of 204 rules in 47 ms. Remains 106 /191 variables (removed 85) and now considering 145/426 (removed 281) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 145 rows 106 cols
[2023-03-18 22:30:50] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:30:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 72 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:30:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 195 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 282 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:30:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:30:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 75 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/191 places, 145/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 416 ms. Remains : 106/191 places, 145/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 145 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1973712496303162438.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability241828964780835090.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1973712496303162438.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability241828964780835090.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,139083,0.667252,26476,2,3753,5,85920,6,0,569,38804,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EF(!(E(A(((s1>=1)&&(l1188>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l159>=1))) U !(((s9>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) * AG(((((s1<1)||(l1189<1))||(((p81<1)||(l156<1))&&(...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * E(TRUE U !(E(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l159>=1))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l1188>=1))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l159>=...338
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t15, t16, t20, t24, t29, t30, t31, t35, t37, t39, t50, t51, t52, t57, t63, t65, t67, t69,...504
(forward)formula 0,0,6.14945,141936,1,0,567,729900,329,248,3963,443648,693
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 164 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 164 transition count 303
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 164 transition count 299
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 144 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 144 transition count 277
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 144 transition count 270
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 131 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 131 transition count 256
Ensure Unique test removed 38 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 38 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 131 transition count 218
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 173 place count 127 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 127 transition count 213
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 179 place count 125 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 125 transition count 211
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 123 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 123 transition count 208
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 121 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 121 transition count 206
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 191 place count 119 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 119 transition count 204
Applied a total of 193 rules in 23 ms. Remains 119 /191 variables (removed 72) and now considering 204/426 (removed 222) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 119 cols
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 121 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 322 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 409 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 101 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/191 places, 204/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 534 ms. Remains : 119/191 places, 204/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 204 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10267269862098652605.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:30:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17393798171648468348.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10267269862098652605.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17393798171648468348.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,172715,2.67374,88320,2,4372,5,343143,6,0,680,89831,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(AF(((AG(((EX(((p80>=1)&&(l963>=1))) * (s1>=1)) * (l159>=1))) * A(((s1>=1)&&(l1189>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1190>=1)))) * ((s1>=1)&&(l1191>=...349
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((EX(((p80>=1)&&(l963>=1))) * (s1>=1)) * (l159>=1))))) * !((E(!(((s1>...567
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t18, t22, t26, t27, t31, t33, t44, t45, t46, t47, t53, t54, t58, t61, t72, t74, t85, t86,...542
(forward)formula 0,1,8.87453,171260,1,0,803,882287,468,377,4727,463606,1107
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 154 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 154 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 154 transition count 191
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 124 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 124 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 124 transition count 145
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 104 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 104 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 104 transition count 113
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 97 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 97 transition count 105
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 222 place count 91 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 91 transition count 99
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 86 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 86 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 86 transition count 91
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 82 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 82 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 80 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 80 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 253 place count 79 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 79 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 78 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 78 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 257 place count 77 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 77 transition count 81
Applied a total of 258 rules in 9 ms. Remains 77 /191 variables (removed 114) and now considering 81/426 (removed 345) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2023-03-18 22:31:06] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:31:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:31:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:31:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 75 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/191 places, 81/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 278 ms. Remains : 77/191 places, 81/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17630659065806749719.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11812642534303979846.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17630659065806749719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11812642534303979846.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,52143,0.176734,12476,2,2284,5,34925,6,0,389,19677,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t52, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t69, t70, t73, t74, t76, t77, t78, t79, t80, In...250
(forward)formula 0,0,1.13337,46720,1,0,543,199531,183,316,2567,176124,456
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 156 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 156 transition count 209
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 156 transition count 205
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 128 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 128 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 128 transition count 162
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 111 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 111 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 111 transition count 130
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 106 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 106 transition count 125
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 102 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 102 transition count 121
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 211 place count 99 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 99 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 99 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 97 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 97 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 221 place count 96 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 96 transition count 112
Applied a total of 222 rules in 34 ms. Remains 96 /191 variables (removed 95) and now considering 112/426 (removed 314) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 96 cols
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 82 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/191 places, 112/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 383 ms. Remains : 96/191 places, 112/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 112 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability522485906242061497.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5883458155209033748.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability522485906242061497.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5883458155209033748.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,79581,0.398812,16416,2,3465,5,46672,6,0,496,26680,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(((s1>=1)&&(l193>=1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1199>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1199>=1)))))) * !(E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1199>=1))) U (!(!(((s1>=1)&&(l193>=1)))) * !(((s1...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t12, t19, t23, t32, t46, t47, t48, t57, t59, t69, t77, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90,...321
(forward)formula 0,0,5.31739,112960,1,0,785,601575,250,367,3326,399753,891
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 157 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 157 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 157 transition count 206
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 130 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 130 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 130 transition count 164
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 157 place count 113 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 113 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 113 transition count 136
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 190 place count 107 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 107 transition count 129
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 102 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 102 transition count 124
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 210 place count 98 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 98 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 98 transition count 117
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 95 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 95 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 224 place count 93 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 93 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 227 place count 92 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 92 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 91 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 91 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 90 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 90 transition count 108
Applied a total of 232 rules in 21 ms. Remains 90 /191 variables (removed 101) and now considering 108/426 (removed 318) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 90 cols
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 9 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 233 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 341 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 63 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/191 places, 108/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 439 ms. Remains : 90/191 places, 108/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13756988968439694943.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13914721139735217354.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13756988968439694943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13914721139735217354.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,87197,0.55933,21912,2,2851,5,78485,6,0,468,36862,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(!(EX(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l1197>=1)))))) U (((!((s1>=1)&&(l1197>=1)))&&(s1>=1))&&((l953>=1)&&(!((s1>=1)&&(l947>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l1197>=1))))))))) * (((!((s1>=1)&&(l1197>=1)))&&(s1>=1))&&((l9...199
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t43, t45, t50, t52, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t82...345
(forward)formula 0,1,1.48775,44424,1,0,196,178326,240,90,3224,93492,230
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 156 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 156 transition count 221
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 156 transition count 217
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 129 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 129 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 129 transition count 176
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 112 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 112 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 112 transition count 142
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 107 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 107 transition count 136
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 104 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 104 transition count 133
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 102 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 102 transition count 130
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 211 place count 100 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 100 transition count 128
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 215 place count 98 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 98 transition count 126
Applied a total of 217 rules in 23 ms. Remains 98 /191 variables (removed 93) and now considering 126/426 (removed 300) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 98 cols
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 61 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 270 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 65 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/191 places, 126/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 360 ms. Remains : 98/191 places, 126/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6596763285650793127.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14507866178528124330.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6596763285650793127.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14507866178528124330.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,86359,0.602984,22660,2,3213,5,73235,6,0,518,32839,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((!(EF(!(((p11>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) * EX(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l1193>=1))))) * ((s1>=1)&&(l1195>=1))) U !(EG(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l1193>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1193>=1))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1193>=1)))))))) U (!...322
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t18, t22, t29, t31, t42, t43, t44, t45, t50, t53, t59, t62, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76, t77,...379
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,3.00945,84280,1,0,473,404268,286,204,3579,247528,575
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 154 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 154 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 154 transition count 191
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 124 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 124 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 124 transition count 145
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 170 place count 105 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 105 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 105 transition count 115
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 98 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 98 transition count 107
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 92 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 92 transition count 101
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 230 place count 87 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 87 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 87 transition count 93
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 241 place count 83 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 83 transition count 89
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 247 place count 81 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 81 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 80 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 80 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 252 place count 79 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 79 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 254 place count 78 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 78 transition count 83
Applied a total of 255 rules in 26 ms. Remains 78 /191 variables (removed 113) and now considering 83/426 (removed 343) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 78 cols
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 43 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 78/191 places, 83/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 289 ms. Remains : 78/191 places, 83/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11713929983457608006.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5697186255778568462.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11713929983457608006.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5697186255778568462.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,52819,0.161459,12756,2,2110,5,36281,6,0,395,18694,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((s1<1)||(l948<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1<1)||(l948<1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t54, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t71, t72, t75, t76, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, In...250
(forward)formula 0,0,1.40787,48628,1,0,528,220553,194,300,2651,171143,476
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 156 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 156 transition count 221
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 156 transition count 217
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 128 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 128 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 128 transition count 175
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 110 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 110 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 110 transition count 139
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 105 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 105 transition count 133
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 101 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 101 transition count 129
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 99 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 99 transition count 127
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 217 place count 98 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 98 transition count 126
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 97 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 97 transition count 125
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 221 place count 96 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 96 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 223 place count 95 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 95 transition count 122
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 225 place count 94 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 94 transition count 121
Applied a total of 226 rules in 16 ms. Remains 94 /191 variables (removed 97) and now considering 121/426 (removed 305) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 94 cols
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 28 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 60 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 269 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 82 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/191 places, 121/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 382 ms. Remains : 94/191 places, 121/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7770082861679311412.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6071520693583208915.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7770082861679311412.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6071520693583208915.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,83791,0.734886,23552,2,2928,5,84121,6,0,497,36617,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((A(((s1>=1)&&(l1201>=1)) U EG(((s1>=1)&&(l1194>=1)))) + !(AG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))))))) U (AG(AF(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l970>=1))))) + ((s1>=1...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,!((!((E(!(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l1194>=1)))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l1201>=1))) * !(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l1194>=1)))))) +...532
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t34, t35, t36, t37, t40, t41, t42, t43, t49, t50, t57, t59, t70, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83,...365
(forward)formula 0,0,3.26823,85280,1,0,479,415010,283,214,3405,251660,574
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 191/191 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 156 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 156 transition count 221
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 156 transition count 217
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 128 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 128 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 128 transition count 175
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 110 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 110 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 110 transition count 139
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 105 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 105 transition count 133
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 101 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 101 transition count 129
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 97 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 97 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 97 transition count 121
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 226 place count 94 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 94 transition count 118
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 92 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 92 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 91 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 91 transition count 114
Applied a total of 235 rules in 25 ms. Remains 91 /191 variables (removed 100) and now considering 114/426 (removed 312) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 91 cols
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 55 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 83 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/191 places, 114/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 296 ms. Remains : 91/191 places, 114/426 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7874799380578356958.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15003160040043143506.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7874799380578356958.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15003160040043143506.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,82809,0.564528,23144,2,2981,5,80972,6,0,478,36443,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1194>=1)))) + (EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1198>=1))) * ((s1<1)||(l149<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1194>=1)))))) + (E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l1198>=1))) * ((s1<1)||(l149<1))))))] =...161
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t15, t19, t37, t38, t39, t45, t46, t50, t53, t54, t64, t72, t80, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91,...327
(forward)formula 0,1,1.8156,52096,1,0,288,222864,257,129,3289,139710,357
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2023-03-18 22:31:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2023-03-18 22:31:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Total runtime 94748 ms.

BK_STOP 1679178687454

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r421-tajo-167905975200410"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06.tgz
mv SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;