fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r261-smll-167863536300370
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ParamProductionCell-PT-1

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
526.955 53721.00 75355.00 332.80 FTFTFTTTFTFFFTTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r261-smll-167863536300370.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-1, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r261-smll-167863536300370
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 728K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K Feb 26 17:16 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K Feb 26 17:16 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K Feb 26 17:15 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K Feb 26 17:15 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K Feb 25 16:29 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Feb 25 16:29 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K Feb 25 16:29 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 16:29 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Feb 26 17:17 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 185K Feb 26 17:17 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Feb 26 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K Feb 26 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Feb 25 16:29 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Feb 25 16:29 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 Mar 5 18:23 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 174K Mar 5 18:23 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678917349697

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ParamProductionCell-PT-1
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-15 21:55:52] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-15 21:55:52] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-15 21:55:52] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 150 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:52] [INFO ] Transformed 231 places.
[2023-03-15 21:55:52] [INFO ] Transformed 202 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:55:52] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2023-03-15 21:55:52] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 231 places and 202 transitions and 846 arcs in 296 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 21 ms.
Support contains 118 out of 231 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 231/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 227 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 227 transition count 198
Applied a total of 8 rules in 62 ms. Remains 227 /231 variables (removed 4) and now considering 198/202 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 198 rows 227 cols
[2023-03-15 21:55:52] [INFO ] Computed 59 place invariants in 31 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 665 ms returned [1, 15, 16, 19, 36, 46, 47, 59, 73, 79, 114, 118, 192]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 724 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 214/231 places, 198/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 214 /214 variables (removed 0) and now considering 198/198 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 800 ms. Remains : 214/231 places, 198/202 transitions.
Support contains 118 out of 214 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-15 21:55:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 84 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 198 transitions.
Support contains 117 out of 214 places (down from 118) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 868 ms. (steps per millisecond=11 ) properties (out of 73) seen :52
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 52 ms. (steps per millisecond=19 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=31 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 21) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 33 ms. (steps per millisecond=30 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 30 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 29 ms. (steps per millisecond=34 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 20 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 198 rows 214 cols
[2023-03-15 21:55:55] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 10 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 27 positive place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2023-03-15 21:55:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 27 positive and 19 generalized place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2023-03-15 21:55:56] [INFO ] After 509ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:20
[2023-03-15 21:55:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 27 positive place invariants in 17 ms returned sat
[2023-03-15 21:55:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 27 positive and 19 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2023-03-15 21:55:56] [INFO ] After 255ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :8 sat :12
[2023-03-15 21:55:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:55:56] [INFO ] After 241ms SMT Verify possible using 68 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :8 sat :12
[2023-03-15 21:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 132 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 142 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 114 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 147 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 111 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 118 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 130 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 122 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 111 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 78 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 122 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:58] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 14 trap constraints in 1969 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 111 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 83 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 122 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 2 trap constraints in 226 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 79 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] After 2850ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :20 sat :0
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] After 3454ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :20 sat :0
Fused 20 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Successfully simplified 20 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 198 transitions.
Support contains 69 out of 214 places (down from 86) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 214 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 207 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 206 transition count 190
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 206 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 189 transition count 173
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 187 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 187 transition count 171
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 170 transition count 154
Applied a total of 88 rules in 104 ms. Remains 170 /214 variables (removed 44) and now considering 154/198 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 170 cols
[2023-03-15 21:55:59] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 287 ms returned [1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 22, 25, 28, 29, 41, 42, 50, 55, 61, 62, 64, 76, 79, 98, 111, 112, 114, 116, 117, 140, 141, 144, 145, 149, 150, 152, 161]
Discarding 32 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 291 ms to find 32 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/214 places, 154/198 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 138 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 125 transition count 139
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 123 transition count 139
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 123 transition count 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 115 transition count 131
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 113 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 113 transition count 129
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 79 transition count 95
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 78 transition count 94
Applied a total of 120 rules in 43 ms. Remains 78 /138 variables (removed 60) and now considering 94/154 (removed 60) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 78 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 197 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 299 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 78/214 places, 94/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 740 ms. Remains : 78/214 places, 94/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6116479430236788922.gal : 5 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2469294065516172880.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6116479430236788922.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2469294065516172880.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,570,0.047647,4300,2,654,5,2816,6,0,409,2089,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(((arm2_backward==1)&&(A2U_ret_rs==1)) U ((A2U_out!=1) + AG((A1U_out==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(((arm2_backward==1)&&(A2U_ret_rs==1)) U ((A2U_out!=1) + !(E(TRUE U !((A1U_out==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t56, t57, t60, t66, t71, t78, t80, t84, t88, t91, t92, t93, In...251
(forward)formula 0,0,0.353882,15112,1,0,261,46185,197,209,2455,50982,320
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 214 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 204 transition count 188
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 204 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 188 transition count 172
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 186 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 186 transition count 170
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 167 transition count 151
Applied a total of 94 rules in 49 ms. Remains 167 /214 variables (removed 47) and now considering 151/198 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 167 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 304 ms returned [1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 22, 25, 28, 29, 41, 42, 50, 55, 60, 61, 63, 75, 77, 78, 96, 109, 112, 114, 115, 137, 138, 141, 142, 146, 147, 149, 158]
Discarding 32 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 306 ms to find 32 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/214 places, 151/198 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 135 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 125 transition count 141
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 125 transition count 133
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 117 transition count 133
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 115 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 115 transition count 131
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 81 transition count 97
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 80 transition count 96
Applied a total of 110 rules in 35 ms. Remains 80 /135 variables (removed 55) and now considering 96/151 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 80 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 232 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 326 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/214 places, 96/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 717 ms. Remains : 80/214 places, 96/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9274033625183791379.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16845168166608481314.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9274033625183791379.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16845168166608481314.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,540,0.031359,4048,2,564,5,2404,6,0,419,1749,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((arm1_stop==1)&&(A1L_loaded==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((arm1_stop==1)&&(A1L_loaded==1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 87/0/9
(forward)formula 0,1,0.188718,9644,1,0,7,26529,20,1,2041,17252,8
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 212 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 212 transition count 196
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 212 /214 variables (removed 2) and now considering 196/198 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 212 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:01] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 389 ms returned [15, 20, 27, 31, 36, 37, 56, 57, 69, 88, 89, 91, 103, 105, 107, 147, 148, 150, 152, 153, 176, 178, 181, 182, 187, 188, 203]
Discarding 27 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 391 ms to find 27 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/214 places, 196/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 183 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 183 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 183 /185 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:02] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 142 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 459 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 605 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 183/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1015 ms. Remains : 183/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14667782145557860702.gal : 5 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5345317860904433915.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14667782145557860702.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5345317860904433915.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.202336,7552,2,3189,5,16788,6,0,929,10458,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((EG(((press_at_upper_pos==1)&&(forge_run==1))) * AF(((crane_lower==0)||(CU_lower_rs==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((EG(((press_at_upper_pos==1)&&(forge_run==1))) * !(EG(!(((crane_lower==0)||(CU_lower_...180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,2.22037,66364,1,0,400,197313,384,229,4982,133729,566
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 212 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 212 transition count 196
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 212 /214 variables (removed 2) and now considering 196/198 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 212 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:05] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 280 ms returned [15, 20, 27, 31, 36, 37, 56, 57, 69, 88, 89, 91, 103, 105, 107, 147, 148, 150, 152, 153, 176, 178, 181, 182, 187, 188, 192, 203]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 281 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/214 places, 196/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 182 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 182 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 182 /184 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 182 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:05] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 341 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 441 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 182/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 735 ms. Remains : 182/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15568956787143396689.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5045008246362794100.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15568956787143396689.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5045008246362794100.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.122973,7012,2,2888,5,15249,6,0,925,9370,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(EX(EX(TRUE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EX(EX(TRUE)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,1.75679,55668,1,0,250,157742,376,165,5015,107909,366
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 214 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 204 transition count 188
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 204 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 188 transition count 172
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 186 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 186 transition count 170
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 167 transition count 151
Applied a total of 94 rules in 21 ms. Remains 167 /214 variables (removed 47) and now considering 151/198 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 167 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:07] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 203 ms returned [1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 22, 25, 28, 29, 41, 42, 50, 55, 60, 61, 63, 75, 77, 78, 96, 109, 110, 112, 114, 115, 137, 138, 141, 142, 146, 147, 149, 158]
Discarding 33 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 204 ms to find 33 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 134/214 places, 151/198 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 134 transition count 135
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 118 transition count 135
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 118 transition count 130
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 113 transition count 130
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 111 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 111 transition count 128
Performed 39 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 39
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 72 transition count 89
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 71 transition count 88
Applied a total of 126 rules in 19 ms. Remains 71 /134 variables (removed 63) and now considering 88/151 (removed 63) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 71 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 257 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 71/214 places, 88/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 502 ms. Remains : 71/214 places, 88/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8809251077348329778.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2581456895403688339.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8809251077348329778.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2581456895403688339.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,520,0.029525,3992,2,528,5,2214,6,0,375,1614,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((A2U_in==1)&&(arm2_pick_up_angle==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((A2U_in==1)&&(arm2_pick_up_angle==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t45, t46, t49, t55, t57, t62, t65, t71, t73, t77, t81, t82, t85, t86, t87, Intersection...241
(forward)formula 0,0,0.150509,8268,1,0,110,15294,178,68,2305,10170,167
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 212 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 212 transition count 196
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 212 /214 variables (removed 2) and now considering 196/198 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 212 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 5 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 236 ms returned [15, 20, 27, 31, 36, 37, 56, 57, 69, 88, 89, 91, 103, 105, 107, 147, 148, 150, 152, 153, 176, 178, 181, 182, 187, 188, 203]
Discarding 27 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 237 ms to find 27 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/214 places, 196/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 183 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 183 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 183 /185 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 405 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 532 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 183/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 776 ms. Remains : 183/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1908529254248386374.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12733482391859195605.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1908529254248386374.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12733482391859195605.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.21911,7556,2,3189,5,16788,6,0,929,10458,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG((EF(((swivel==1)&&(arm1_waiting_for_swivel_2==1))) + AX(FALSE)))) * AX(AX(((crane_lower==0)||(CL_lower_rs==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U EG((E(TRUE U ((swivel==1)&&(arm1_waiting_for_swivel_2==1))) + !(EX(!(FALSE))))))))] = FALSE...225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,3.4807,92652,1,0,373,428393,382,229,5214,259399,528
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 214 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 204 transition count 188
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 204 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 189 transition count 173
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 187 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 187 transition count 171
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 172 transition count 156
Applied a total of 84 rules in 18 ms. Remains 172 /214 variables (removed 42) and now considering 156/198 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 172 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:12] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 261 ms returned [1, 7, 13, 17, 22, 25, 28, 29, 41, 42, 50, 63, 64, 66, 78, 80, 81, 99, 114, 115, 117, 119, 120, 142, 143, 146, 147, 152, 154, 163]
Discarding 30 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 262 ms to find 30 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/214 places, 156/198 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 142 transition count 143
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 129 transition count 143
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 129 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 127 transition count 141
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 125 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 125 transition count 139
Performed 40 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 40
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 85 transition count 99
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 84 transition count 98
Applied a total of 116 rules in 17 ms. Remains 84 /142 variables (removed 58) and now considering 98/156 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 84 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 186 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 270 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 84/214 places, 98/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 567 ms. Remains : 84/214 places, 98/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4368602967628282374.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16817147438371869800.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4368602967628282374.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16817147438371869800.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,940,0.032928,4064,2,649,5,2309,6,0,437,1529,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((crane_to_belt2==1)&&(CU_trans_rs==1)) U !(AF(AG(((swivel==1)&&(arm2_waiting_for_swivel_1==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,((crane_to_belt2==1)&&(CU_trans_rs==1))),!(!(E(TRUE U !(((swivel==1)&&(arm2_waiting_for_swivel_1...175
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 94/3/4
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t14, t26, t46, t53, t56, t57, t60, t66, t68, t73, t76, t82, t84, t88, t92, t95, t96, t97, In...251
(forward)formula 0,1,0.173879,8868,1,0,129,19097,205,78,2716,12489,190
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 212 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 212 transition count 196
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 212 /214 variables (removed 2) and now considering 196/198 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 212 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 257 ms returned [15, 20, 27, 36, 37, 56, 57, 69, 88, 89, 91, 103, 105, 107, 147, 148, 150, 152, 176, 178, 182, 187, 188, 192]
Discarding 24 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 259 ms to find 24 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/214 places, 196/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 186 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 186 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 186 /188 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 186 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:13] [INFO ] Computed 22 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 336 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 499 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 186/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 766 ms. Remains : 186/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13553107984517267878.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability196669284020002664.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13553107984517267878.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability196669284020002664.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.223626,7576,2,3285,5,17358,6,0,941,10569,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((EF(!(E((((crane_lift==1)&&(crane_pick_up_height==1))&&(CL_lift_run==1)) U ((A1_extended==1)&&(arm1_magnet_off==1))))) * EG((((PU_out...434
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(((EY(Init) * (E(TRUE U !(E((((crane_lift==1)&&(crane_pick_up_height==1))&&(CL_lift_run==1)) U ((A1_exte...1143
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,3.48674,88644,1,0,379,380828,391,235,5608,236792,543
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 212 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 212 transition count 196
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 212 /214 variables (removed 2) and now considering 196/198 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 212 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 257 ms returned [15, 20, 27, 31, 36, 37, 57, 69, 88, 89, 91, 103, 107, 147, 148, 150, 152, 176, 178, 181, 182, 187, 188, 192, 203]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 258 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/214 places, 196/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 185 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 185 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 185 /187 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 185 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 355 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 478 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 185/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 743 ms. Remains : 185/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10876925232116229956.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10578258379526419971.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10876925232116229956.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10578258379526419971.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.211605,7308,2,3046,5,15958,6,0,937,9635,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((A(((A1_extended==1)&&(arm1_magnet_off==1)) U (AG((((belt2_light_barrier_false==1)&&(belt2_start==1))&&(DB_trans_run==1))) + AF((A1...296
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U !((((belt2_light_barrier_false==1)&&(belt2_start==1))&&(DB_...641
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,6.92454,196252,1,0,1216,1.22744e+06,399,568,5304,781559,1558
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 212 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 212 transition count 196
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 212 /214 variables (removed 2) and now considering 196/198 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 212 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:25] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 239 ms returned [27, 31, 36, 56, 57, 88, 89, 91, 103, 107, 148, 152, 153, 176, 181, 182, 187, 192, 203]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 243 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 193/214 places, 196/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 191 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 191 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 191 /193 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 191 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Computed 27 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 324 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 448 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 191/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 698 ms. Remains : 191/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14163021006479608642.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6161649779273715974.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14163021006479608642.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6161649779273715974.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.133937,7380,2,3378,5,15815,6,0,961,9858,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((PU_out==1) + A((E(((table_stop_h==1)&&(TU_in==1)) U ((belt1_start==1)&&(FB_deliver_rs==1))) + ((arm1_forward==1)&&(A1L_ext_rs==1))) ...869
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((PU_out==1) + !((E(!(((!(EG(!(((crane_stop_h==1)&&(CL_ready_to_transport==1))))) + !(E(TRUE U !((F...1445
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,7.29382,196776,1,0,1133,1.21472e+06,385,525,5301,797204,1444
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 212 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 212 transition count 196
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 212 /214 variables (removed 2) and now considering 196/198 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 212 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:33] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 273 ms returned [15, 27, 31, 36, 37, 56, 57, 88, 89, 91, 103, 105, 107, 147, 150, 152, 153, 176, 178, 181, 182, 187, 188, 192, 203]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 275 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/214 places, 196/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 185 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 185 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 185 /187 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 185 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 391 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 506 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 185/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 788 ms. Remains : 185/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16384328649021021699.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10514708052603751735.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16384328649021021699.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10514708052603751735.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.142193,7576,2,3207,5,17632,6,0,937,11136,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((EX(((belt1_start==1)&&(FB_deliver_rs==1))) + (((press_upward==1)&&(forge_rs==1))&&((arm1_stop==0)||(A1U_unloadet==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((EX(((belt1_start==1)&&(FB_deliver_rs==1))) + (((press_upward==1)&&(forge_rs==1))&&((arm...198
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,3.01839,86408,1,0,255,303040,379,171,5060,210501,370
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 214/214 places, 198/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 212 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 212 transition count 196
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 212 /214 variables (removed 2) and now considering 196/198 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 212 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:37] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 314 ms returned [15, 20, 27, 31, 36, 37, 56, 57, 88, 89, 91, 105, 107, 147, 148, 150, 152, 153, 176, 178, 181, 187, 188, 192, 203]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 319 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/214 places, 196/198 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 185 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 185 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 185 /187 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 185 cols
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned []
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 395 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 565 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 185/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 900 ms. Remains : 185/214 places, 194/198 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2884721040909407814.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5465027046374160198.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2884721040909407814.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5465027046374160198.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.142358,7580,2,3313,5,17042,6,0,937,10761,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AF(((crane_stop_v==0)||(CL_in==0)))) * (A(AF((PU_out!=1)) U (((arm2_retract_ext==1)&&(arm2_forward==1))&&(A2U_ext_run==1))) + AX(EX(E...200
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(!(EG(!(((crane_stop_v==0)||(CL_in==0))))))))] = FALSE * [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!((((arm2_retract_ext...443
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,3.73456,93256,1,0,460,425300,386,265,5278,257359,646
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2023-03-15 21:56:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-15 21:56:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Total runtime 50372 ms.

BK_STOP 1678917403418

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ParamProductionCell-PT-1"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-1, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r261-smll-167863536300370"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ParamProductionCell-PT-1.tgz
mv ParamProductionCell-PT-1 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;