fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r234-tall-167856420300462
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of Marcie+red for LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
10176.712 1054978.00 1087661.00 2550.60 FFTTTTTFFFTTFTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r234-tall-167856420300462.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool marciexred
Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r234-tall-167856420300462
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 812K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Feb 25 16:54 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K Feb 25 16:54 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Feb 25 16:54 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K Feb 25 16:54 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K Feb 25 16:20 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Feb 25 16:20 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Feb 25 16:20 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Feb 25 16:20 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Feb 25 16:55 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 148K Feb 25 16:55 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 16:55 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K Feb 25 16:55 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Feb 25 16:20 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K Feb 25 16:20 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 254K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1679505636126

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=marciexred
BK_EXAMINATION=ReachabilityCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3
Applying reductions before tool marcie
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-22 17:20:37] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, ReachabilityCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2023-03-22 17:20:37] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-22 17:20:37] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 86 ms
[2023-03-22 17:20:37] [INFO ] Transformed 462 places.
[2023-03-22 17:20:37] [INFO ] Transformed 409 transitions.
[2023-03-22 17:20:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 462 places and 409 transitions and 1324 arcs in 153 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/ReachabilityCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 379 resets, run finished after 453 ms. (steps per millisecond=22 ) properties (out of 16) seen :3
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 67 resets, run finished after 73 ms. (steps per millisecond=137 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 65 resets, run finished after 62 ms. (steps per millisecond=161 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 120 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 42 ms. (steps per millisecond=238 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 44 ms. (steps per millisecond=227 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 65 resets, run finished after 52 ms. (steps per millisecond=192 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 55 ms. (steps per millisecond=181 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 44 ms. (steps per millisecond=227 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 63 resets, run finished after 35 ms. (steps per millisecond=285 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 64 resets, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=270 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 65 resets, run finished after 42 ms. (steps per millisecond=238 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 50 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 65 resets, run finished after 38 ms. (steps per millisecond=263 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 13 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 409 rows 462 cols
[2023-03-22 17:20:39] [INFO ] Computed 53 place invariants in 35 ms
[2023-03-22 17:20:39] [INFO ] After 326ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:13
[2023-03-22 17:20:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2023-03-22 17:20:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive and 42 generalized place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2023-03-22 17:20:40] [INFO ] After 294ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :9 sat :4
[2023-03-22 17:20:40] [INFO ] After 539ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :9 sat :4
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 180 ms.
[2023-03-22 17:20:40] [INFO ] After 1016ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :9 sat :4
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STRUCTURAL_REDUCTION TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT
Fused 13 Parikh solutions to 4 different solutions.
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PARIKH_WALK
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PARIKH_WALK
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 13 ms.
Support contains 75 out of 462 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 462/462 places, 409/409 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 849 edges and 462 vertex of which 284 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 178 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 178 places :
Also discarding 62 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 62 transitions
Drop transitions removed 40 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 40 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 284 transition count 289
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 264 transition count 278
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 27 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 253 transition count 251
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 226 transition count 251
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 226 transition count 237
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 212 transition count 237
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 203 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 203 transition count 228
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 9 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 203 transition count 219
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 194 transition count 219
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 10 times.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 194 transition count 219
Applied a total of 229 rules in 72 ms. Remains 194 /462 variables (removed 268) and now considering 219/409 (removed 190) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 72 ms. Remains : 194/462 places, 219/409 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 728 resets, run finished after 41 ms. (steps per millisecond=243 ) properties (out of 2) seen :1
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Finished Best-First random walk after 196 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=196 )
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
All properties solved without resorting to model-checking.
Total runtime 3141 ms.
timeout --kill-after=10s --signal=SIGINT 1m for testing only

Marcie built on Linux at 2019-11-18.
A model checker for Generalized Stochastic Petri nets

authors: Alex Tovchigrechko (IDD package and CTL model checking)

Martin Schwarick (Symbolic numerical analysis and CSL model checking)

Christian Rohr (Simulative and approximative numerical model checking)

marcie@informatik.tu-cottbus.de

called as: /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../marcie/bin/marcie --net-file=model.pnml --mcc-file=ReachabilityCardinality.xml --memory=6 --mcc-mode

parse successfull
net created successfully

Net: LeafsetExtension_PT_S08C3
(NrP: 462 NrTr: 409 NrArc: 1324)

parse formulas
formulas created successfully
place and transition orderings generation:0m 0.018sec

net check time: 0m 0.000sec

init dd package: 0m 2.758sec


RS generation: 8m51.878sec


-> reachability set: #nodes 3360441 (3.4e+06) #states 26,263,874 (7)



starting MCC model checker
--------------------------

checking: AG [Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=1]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=1]]]

abstracting: (Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 2.235sec

checking: AG [LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5<=3]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5<=3]]]

abstracting: (LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.005sec

checking: EF [~ [Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode5<=Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode5<=Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2]]

abstracting: (Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode5<=Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 25,875,069 (7)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m48.771sec

checking: AG [[2<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8 | Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=3]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[2<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8 | Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=3]]]]

abstracting: (Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8)
states: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 1.323sec

checking: AG [[Node1FailureProcessedByNode5<=2 | LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode2<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode7]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[Node1FailureProcessedByNode5<=2 | LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode2<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode7]]]]

abstracting: (LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode2<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode7)
states: 25,662,224 (7)
abstracting: (Node1FailureProcessedByNode5<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.709sec

checking: AG [~ [[[Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0 & 3<=RequestOfNode8IsSentToRx] & ~ [[Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node4FailureProcessedByNode0 & [1<=Node4FailureProcessedByNode8 | ~ [[~ [2<=Node7FailureProcessedByNode5] | [Node3FailureProcessedByNode2<=Node6FailureProcessedByNode1 & Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6<=3]]]]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U [~ [[Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node4FailureProcessedByNode0 & [1<=Node4FailureProcessedByNode8 | ~ [[~ [2<=Node7FailureProcessedByNode5] | [Node3FailureProcessedByNode2<=Node6FailureProcessedByNode1 & Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6<=3]]]]]] & [Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0 & 3<=RequestOfNode8IsSentToRx]]]]

abstracting: (3<=RequestOfNode8IsSentToRx)
states: 7
abstracting: (Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0)
states: 26,133,383 (7)
abstracting: (Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node3FailureProcessedByNode2<=Node6FailureProcessedByNode1)
states: 26,028,346 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node7FailureProcessedByNode5)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=Node4FailureProcessedByNode8)
states: 394,580 (5)
abstracting: (Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node4FailureProcessedByNode0)
states: 26,137,037 (7)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 7.130sec

checking: EF [~ [[[3<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 & 1<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1] | [~ [3<=Node5isTheNodeMaster] | ~ [[~ [[Node2HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=0 | [Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node7DontAnswerToAnyNode | Node5Failure<=0]]] & ~ [[[Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=1 & 1<=Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2] | [Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=2 & Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=0]]]]]]]]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [[[~ [[~ [[[Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=1 & 1<=Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2] | [Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=2 & Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=0]]] & ~ [[Node2HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=0 | [Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node7DontAnswerToAnyNode | Node5Failure<=0]]]]] | ~ [3<=Node5isTheNodeMaster]] | [3<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 & 1<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1]]]]

abstracting: (1<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1)
states: 381,189 (5)
abstracting: (3<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 0
abstracting: (3<=Node5isTheNodeMaster)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node5Failure<=0)
states: 17,938,166 (7)
abstracting: (Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node7DontAnswerToAnyNode)
states: 26,132,445 (7)
abstracting: (Node2HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=0)
states: 26,131,938 (7)
abstracting: (Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=0)
states: 26,131,933 (7)
abstracting: (Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2)
states: 391,557 (5)
abstracting: (Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m14.082sec

checking: AG [[[[Node3FailureProcessedByNode0<=Node6DontAnswerToAnyNode & [[[[Node1FailureProcessedByNode3<=2 | Node4FailureProcessedByNode8<=2] | [[[RequestOfNode5IsSentToLx<=0 & Node2HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2] & ~ [Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7<=Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5]] | Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=1]] & [RequestOfNode0IsSentToRx<=2 | [[Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=1 | [Node8FailureProcessedByNode2<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode4 | 1<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1]] & LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode7<=3]]] & Node3FailureProcessedByNode6<=0]] & Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=0] | RequestOfNode4IsSentToRx<=1]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[RequestOfNode4IsSentToRx<=1 | [Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=0 & [Node3FailureProcessedByNode0<=Node6DontAnswerToAnyNode & [Node3FailureProcessedByNode6<=0 & [[RequestOfNode0IsSentToRx<=2 | [LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode7<=3 & [Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=1 | [Node8FailureProcessedByNode2<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode4 | 1<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1]]]] & [[Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=1 | [~ [Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7<=Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5] & [RequestOfNode5IsSentToLx<=0 & Node2HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2]]] | [Node1FailureProcessedByNode3<=2 | Node4FailureProcessedByNode8<=2]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (Node4FailureProcessedByNode8<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node1FailureProcessedByNode3<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node2HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2)
states: 26,133,407 (7)
abstracting: (RequestOfNode5IsSentToLx<=0)
states: 25,744,849 (7)
abstracting: (Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7<=Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 25,873,886 (7)
abstracting: (Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1)
states: 128,477 (5)
abstracting: (Node8FailureProcessedByNode2<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode4)
states: 26,031,002 (7)
abstracting: (Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode7<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (RequestOfNode0IsSentToRx<=2)
states: 26,263,870 (7)
abstracting: (Node3FailureProcessedByNode6<=0)
states: 26,027,422 (7)
abstracting: (Node3FailureProcessedByNode0<=Node6DontAnswerToAnyNode)
states: 26,027,566 (7)
abstracting: (Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=0)
states: 26,131,933 (7)
abstracting: (RequestOfNode4IsSentToRx<=1)
states: 26,261,042 (7)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m18.779sec

checking: AG [[[[~ [[[1<=RequestOfNode6IsSentToLx & [2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7 | [Node7HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3<=2 | Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=2]]] & [[Node0FailureProcessedByNode6<=2 & [[3<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode1 & Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode7] & ~ [Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<=2]]] | ~ [1<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode3]]]] | [~ [[~ [Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=0] | 1<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5]] | [~ [Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7] & [~ [Node8FailureProcessedByNode1<=3] & RequestOfNode4IsSentToLx<=1]]]] | Node3HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node6IsActive] & [[2<=Node1HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7 & Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7] | ~ [1<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[~ [1<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2] | [2<=Node1HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7 & Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7]] & [Node3HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node6IsActive | [[[[RequestOfNode4IsSentToLx<=1 & ~ [Node8FailureProcessedByNode1<=3]] & ~ [Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7]] | ~ [[1<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 | ~ [Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=0]]]] | ~ [[[~ [1<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode3] | [Node0FailureProcessedByNode6<=2 & [~ [Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<=2] & [3<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode1 & Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode7]]]] & [1<=RequestOfNode6IsSentToLx & [2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7 | [Node7HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3<=2 | Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=2]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node7HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=RequestOfNode6IsSentToLx)
states: 519,025 (5)
abstracting: (Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode7)
states: 26,044,894 (7)
abstracting: (3<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode1)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node0FailureProcessedByNode6<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode3)
states: 237,240 (5)
abstracting: (Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=0)
states: 26,131,949 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 131,941 (5)
abstracting: (Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7)
states: 26,132,437 (7)
abstracting: (Node8FailureProcessedByNode1<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (RequestOfNode4IsSentToLx<=1)
states: 26,261,042 (7)
abstracting: (Node3HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node6IsActive)
states: 26,232,627 (7)
abstracting: (Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7)
states: 25,873,883 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node1HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2)
states: 391,446 (5)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 1m 3.617sec

checking: AG [~ [[2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 & [3<=Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1 | [~ [1<=Node7HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode4] & [[[[[3<=Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 | 3<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8] & [2<=Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0 | Node6FailureProcessedByNode5<=1]] & [[2<=Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6 | Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7<=1] & Node0HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=Node8Failure]] & [Node6Failure<=3 | [[Node4HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode0<=2 & 2<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8] | [Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 & 2<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8]]]] & [~ [[Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 & 1<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1]] & [1<=RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode6 & ~ [[RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode7<=Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode | 1<=Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5]]]]]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U [2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 & [3<=Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1 | [[[[1<=RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode6 & ~ [[RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode7<=Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode | 1<=Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5]]] & ~ [[Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 & 1<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1]]] & [[Node6Failure<=3 | [[Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 & 2<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8] | [Node4HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode0<=2 & 2<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8]]] & [[Node0HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=Node8Failure & [2<=Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6 | Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7<=1]] & [[2<=Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0 | Node6FailureProcessedByNode5<=1] & [3<=Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 | 3<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8]]]]] & ~ [1<=Node7HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode4]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=Node7HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode4)
states: 659,532 (5)
abstracting: (3<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 0
abstracting: (3<=Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node6FailureProcessedByNode5<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node0HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=Node8Failure)
states: 26,163,049 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node4HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode0<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 26,132,426 (7)
abstracting: (Node6Failure<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1)
states: 131,936 (5)
abstracting: (Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 26,132,437 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5)
states: 131,947 (5)
abstracting: (RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode7<=Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode)
states: 25,659,710 (7)
abstracting: (1<=RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode6)
states: 606,032 (5)
abstracting: (3<=Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m18.828sec

checking: AG [[Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1 | [[Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6 & ~ [1<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0]] | [[[Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 | [[[[Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1 | Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7] & 1<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode5] & [~ [2<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode1] | ~ [1<=Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1]]] & Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node8FailureProcessedByNode0]] & ~ [Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=3]] | [1<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8 & ~ [[[[[Node7FailureProcessedByNode6<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode4 | Node7FailureProcessedByNode4<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2] | [3<=RightNodeHasDetectedBreakDownOfMaster | 3<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode3]] & [[1<=Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6 | 2<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1] & [2<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0 & Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=RequestOfNode7IsSentToLx]]] | 1<=Node6FailureProcessedByNode0]]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1 | [[[~ [Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=3] & [Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 | [Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node8FailureProcessedByNode0 & [[~ [1<=Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1] | ~ [2<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode1]] & [1<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode5 & [Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1 | Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7]]]]]] | [1<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8 & ~ [[1<=Node6FailureProcessedByNode0 | [[[3<=RightNodeHasDetectedBreakDownOfMaster | 3<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode3] | [Node7FailureProcessedByNode6<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode4 | Node7FailureProcessedByNode4<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2]] & [[2<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0 & Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=RequestOfNode7IsSentToLx] & [1<=Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6 | 2<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1]]]]]]] | [Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6 & ~ [1<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0)
states: 131,936 (5)
abstracting: (Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6)
states: 26,132,437 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6)
states: 131,925 (5)
abstracting: (Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=RequestOfNode7IsSentToLx)
states: 26,133,388 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node7FailureProcessedByNode4<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2)
states: 26,035,196 (7)
abstracting: (Node7FailureProcessedByNode6<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode4)
states: 26,028,346 (7)
abstracting: (3<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode3)
states: 0
abstracting: (3<=RightNodeHasDetectedBreakDownOfMaster)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=Node6FailureProcessedByNode0)
states: 236,432 (5)
abstracting: (1<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 131,936 (5)
abstracting: (Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7)
states: 26,132,429 (7)
abstracting: (Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1)
states: 26,044,032 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode5)
states: 236,452 (5)
abstracting: (2<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode1)
states: 2,904 (3)
abstracting: (1<=Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1)
states: 131,936 (5)
abstracting: (Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node8FailureProcessedByNode0)
states: 25,875,041 (7)
abstracting: (Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 26,135,877 (7)
abstracting: (Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1)
states: 26,132,426 (7)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m28.797sec

checking: AG [[[[[~ [[Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8 & [[RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode4<=0 | Node0FailureProcessedByNode8<=2] & 2<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode8]]] & ~ [LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode3]] | [1<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8 | 2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]] | [[[~ [[[Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=3 | RequestOfNode2IsSentToRx<=3] & [Node6HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=2 & 3<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2]]] & [~ [[ANodeFromTheLeafSetOfLxIsACtiveInTheLeafSet<=Node2DontAnswerToAnyNode & [Node5Failure<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode1 | 1<=Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6]]] | [[Node3Failure<=3 & [Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=3 & Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=BreakDownReservoir]] | ~ [[1<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3 & 3<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]]]]] | Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6] | [~ [Node6FailureProcessedByNode4<=1] | Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode4<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]]] & Node5FailureProcessedByNode7<=Node5DontAnswerToAnyNode]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[Node5FailureProcessedByNode7<=Node5DontAnswerToAnyNode & [[[Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode4<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3 | ~ [Node6FailureProcessedByNode4<=1]] | [Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6 | [[[~ [[1<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3 & 3<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]] | [Node3Failure<=3 & [Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=3 & Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=BreakDownReservoir]]] | ~ [[ANodeFromTheLeafSetOfLxIsACtiveInTheLeafSet<=Node2DontAnswerToAnyNode & [Node5Failure<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode1 | 1<=Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6]]]] & ~ [[[Node6HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=2 & 3<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2] & [Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=3 | RequestOfNode2IsSentToRx<=3]]]]]] | [[1<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8 | 2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3] | [~ [LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode3] & ~ [[Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8 & [2<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode8 & [RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode4<=0 | Node0FailureProcessedByNode8<=2]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (Node0FailureProcessedByNode8<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode4<=0)
states: 25,755,004 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode8)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 26,132,421 (7)
abstracting: (LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode3)
states: 25,752,297 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 131,925 (5)
abstracting: (RequestOfNode2IsSentToRx<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (3<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node6HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6)
states: 391,446 (5)
abstracting: (Node5Failure<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode1)
states: 18,086,222 (7)
abstracting: (ANodeFromTheLeafSetOfLxIsACtiveInTheLeafSet<=Node2DontAnswerToAnyNode)
states: 21,811,168 (7)
abstracting: (Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=BreakDownReservoir)
states: 26,132,499 (7)
abstracting: (Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node3Failure<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (3<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 131,925 (5)
abstracting: (Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6)
states: 25,876,775 (7)
abstracting: (Node6FailureProcessedByNode4<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode4<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 25,606,964 (7)
abstracting: (Node5FailureProcessedByNode7<=Node5DontAnswerToAnyNode)
states: 26,026,634 (7)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 1m21.164sec

checking: AG [[Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=3 | [1<=Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 | [[[[~ [[Node4IsActive<=1 & 2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2]] & [Node0HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3<=2 | [[Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=RequestOfNode7IsSentToRx & Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3<=2] | [Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=1 & Node0HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7<=3]]]] & ~ [[[[3<=RequestOfNode1IsSentToRx & LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5<=Node1Failure] | [Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 | 3<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0]] & [2<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2 | [3<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3 & Node8IsActive<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5]]]]] | [[[[~ [LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode7<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5] | ~ [Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4]] & [[LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode0<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3 & Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=2] | Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=3]] & ~ [[Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=0 & 1<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1]]] | 1<=Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode]] & Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<=Node0IsActive]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=3 | [1<=Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 | [Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<=Node0IsActive & [[1<=Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode | [[[Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=3 | [LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode0<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3 & Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=2]] & [~ [Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4] | ~ [LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode7<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5]]] & ~ [[Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=0 & 1<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1]]]] | [~ [[[[Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 | 3<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0] | [3<=RequestOfNode1IsSentToRx & LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5<=Node1Failure]] & [2<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2 | [3<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3 & Node8IsActive<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5]]]] & [~ [[Node4IsActive<=1 & 2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2]] & [Node0HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3<=2 | [[Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=1 & Node0HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7<=3] | [Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=RequestOfNode7IsSentToRx & Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3<=2]]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=RequestOfNode7IsSentToRx)
states: 26,134,255 (7)
abstracting: (Node0HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node0HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node4IsActive<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node8IsActive<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 8,400,996 (6)
abstracting: (3<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2)
states: 0
abstracting: (LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5<=Node1Failure)
states: 25,885,066 (7)
abstracting: (3<=RequestOfNode1IsSentToRx)
states: 4
abstracting: (3<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 26,132,437 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1)
states: 131,925 (5)
abstracting: (Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=0)
states: 26,131,927 (7)
abstracting: (LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode7<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 25,659,678 (7)
abstracting: (Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4)
states: 26,132,829 (7)
abstracting: (Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode0<=Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 25,659,678 (7)
abstracting: (Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode)
states: 136,403 (5)
abstracting: (Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<=Node0IsActive)
states: 26,232,774 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 131,941 (5)
abstracting: (Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m42.252sec

checking: EF [~ [[Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4 | [[RequestOfNode1IsSentToRx<=2 | [[~ [[[Node7IsActive<=3 | Node4FailureProcessedByNode5<=Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3] | ~ [Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1]]] & ~ [2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8]] | [[1<=Node6FailureProcessedByNode1 & Node2FailureProcessedByNode6<=Node8FailureProcessedByNode0] & ~ [1<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6]]]] & [[Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=2 & [Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6 | [LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode8<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 | [[Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3<=Node4FailureProcessedByNode5 | 3<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode3] & ~ [RequestOfNode3IsSentToRx<=0]]]]] | [Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1<=Node8FailureProcessedByNode7 | [[~ [1<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode8] | ~ [[1<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6 | Node0Failure<=Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2]]] & ~ [[[Node2HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode5 & 1<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3] | [Node3isTheNodeMaster<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode6 | Node1FailureProcessedByNode3<=3]]]]]]]]]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [[Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4 | [[[Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1<=Node8FailureProcessedByNode7 | [~ [[[Node2HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode5 & 1<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3] | [Node3isTheNodeMaster<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode6 | Node1FailureProcessedByNode3<=3]]] & [~ [[1<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6 | Node0Failure<=Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2]] | ~ [1<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode8]]]] | [Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=2 & [Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6 | [LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode8<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 | [~ [RequestOfNode3IsSentToRx<=0] & [Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3<=Node4FailureProcessedByNode5 | 3<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]]]]]] & [RequestOfNode1IsSentToRx<=2 | [[~ [1<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6] & [1<=Node6FailureProcessedByNode1 & Node2FailureProcessedByNode6<=Node8FailureProcessedByNode0]] | [~ [2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8] & ~ [[~ [Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1] | [Node7IsActive<=3 | Node4FailureProcessedByNode5<=Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (Node4FailureProcessedByNode5<=Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 26,067,404 (7)
abstracting: (Node7IsActive<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1)
states: 25,873,886 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node2FailureProcessedByNode6<=Node8FailureProcessedByNode0)
states: 26,029,154 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node6FailureProcessedByNode1)
states: 236,432 (5)
abstracting: (1<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6)
states: 131,936 (5)
abstracting: (RequestOfNode1IsSentToRx<=2)
states: 26,263,870 (7)
abstracting: (3<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3<=Node4FailureProcessedByNode5)
states: 26,132,753 (7)
abstracting: (RequestOfNode3IsSentToRx<=0)
states: 25,744,849 (7)
abstracting: (LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode8<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 25,746,301 (7)
abstracting: (Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6)
states: 26,131,949 (7)
abstracting: (Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode8)
states: 236,432 (5)
abstracting: (Node0Failure<=Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 17,994,324 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6)
states: 391,446 (5)
abstracting: (Node1FailureProcessedByNode3<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node3isTheNodeMaster<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode6)
states: 22,954,548 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3)
states: 390,257 (5)
abstracting: (Node2HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode5)
states: 26,133,872 (7)
abstracting: (Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1<=Node8FailureProcessedByNode7)
states: 25,876,341 (7)
abstracting: (Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4)
states: 26,136,277 (7)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m32.633sec

checking: AG [[[[[[[[[[Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 & Node1HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=RequestOfNode8IsSentToLx] | [1<=Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 | Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=1]] & [Node3HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode6<=1 & Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=3]] & Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=2] | [RequestOfNode3IsSentToRx<=2 | [[~ [Node2HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode4<=Node4IsActive] | ~ [Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=2]] | ~ [Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=1]]]] | [[~ [[~ [Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode4] | ~ [Node5HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=2]]] & Node8HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode0<=Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0] & Node2HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7]] & Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode3] & Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4] | [~ [[[[Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=0 | [3<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 & [~ [RequestOfNode8IsSentToLx<=3] & ~ [Node0Failure<=Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8]]]] & ~ [[1<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode1 & Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node7IsActive]]] | [[[[[3<=Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode & 1<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2] | 2<=Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7] & [~ [Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=2] | [Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3 | Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7<=Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]]] & ~ [Node1FailureProcessedByNode7<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]] | 2<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6]]] | [[Node8HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode4 | ~ [[~ [[1<=Node0FailureProcessedByNode8 | RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode4<=2]] & 2<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0]]] & [Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2 | 2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[[[Node8HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode4 | ~ [[2<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0 & ~ [[1<=Node0FailureProcessedByNode8 | RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode4<=2]]]]] & [Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2 | 2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5]] | ~ [[[2<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6 | [[[[Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3 | Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7<=Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3] | ~ [Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=2]] & [2<=Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7 | [3<=Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode & 1<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2]]] & ~ [Node1FailureProcessedByNode7<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]]] | [~ [[1<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode1 & Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node7IsActive]] & [Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=0 | [3<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 & [~ [Node0Failure<=Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8] & ~ [RequestOfNode8IsSentToLx<=3]]]]]]]] | [Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4 & [Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode3 & [[Node2HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7 & [Node8HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode0<=Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0 & ~ [[~ [Node5HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=2] | ~ [Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode4]]]]] | [[Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=2 & [[Node3HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode6<=1 & Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=3] & [[1<=Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2 | Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=1] | [Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 & Node1HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=RequestOfNode8IsSentToLx]]]] | [RequestOfNode3IsSentToRx<=2 | [~ [Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=1] | [~ [Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=2] | ~ [Node2HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode4<=Node4IsActive]]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (Node2HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode4<=Node4IsActive)
states: 26,041,410 (7)
abstracting: (Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (RequestOfNode3IsSentToRx<=2)
states: 26,263,870 (7)
abstracting: (Node1HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=RequestOfNode8IsSentToLx)
states: 26,133,404 (7)
abstracting: (Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 26,136,349 (7)
abstracting: (Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 131,925 (5)
abstracting: (Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node3HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode6<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode4)
states: 26,133,859 (7)
abstracting: (Node5HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node8HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode0<=Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode0)
states: 26,131,938 (7)
abstracting: (Node2HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1<=Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7)
states: 26,132,429 (7)
abstracting: (Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node1FailureProcessedByNode3)
states: 26,136,297 (7)
abstracting: (Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4)
states: 26,132,829 (7)
abstracting: (RequestOfNode8IsSentToLx<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node0Failure<=Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 17,994,740 (7)
abstracting: (3<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=0)
states: 26,131,949 (7)
abstracting: (Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node7IsActive)
states: 26,232,774 (7)
abstracting: (1<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode1)
states: 1,188,399 (6)
abstracting: (Node1FailureProcessedByNode7<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 26,028,374 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2)
states: 131,936 (5)
abstracting: (3<=Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode7)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7<=Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 25,873,883 (7)
abstracting: (Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3)
states: 26,153,953 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2)
states: 26,132,437 (7)
abstracting: (RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode4<=2)
states: 26,263,870 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node0FailureProcessedByNode8)
states: 236,432 (5)
abstracting: (2<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node8HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode4)
states: 26,041,410 (7)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m55.500sec

checking: AG [[[~ [[[[~ [[[BreakDownReservoir<=0 & Node8HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8] & ~ [1<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4]]] | [~ [Node2FailureProcessedByNode3<=Node7HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8] & ~ [[3<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode8 & Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode6]]]] | [[[[Node6FailureProcessedByNode4<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0 & 2<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode4] | 2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8] & Node0HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7<=3] | [~ [Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=1] & [~ [Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=0] & [2<=Node4HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2 | Node5FailureProcessedByNode6<=0]]]]] & [Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=3 & ~ [[~ [2<=RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode8] & [[LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode7<=0 | Node4Failure<=Node7FailureProcessedByNode3] & Node2FailureProcessedByNode3<=1]]]]]] | [Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6 | [Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=3 | [[[[NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3 | LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode7<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3] | Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode6] & ~ [LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode5<=RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode5]] | [[[[3<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6 & Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=RequestOfNode5IsSentToRx] | [2<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 & Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2<=3]] | Node8HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode0<=3] & [[~ [Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8] | [3<=RequestOfNode5IsSentToLx | Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode4<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode7]] & [[Node3DontAnswerToAnyNode<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode2 & 1<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8] & [Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1 & 3<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode4]]]]]]]] | [[[2<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode5 & [2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4 & [~ [[[Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6<=2 | Node3FailureProcessedByNode2<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7] | ~ [Node0HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2]]] | [[Node8HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode6<=2 & [1<=Node5isTheNodeMaster | Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]] & 1<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1]]]] & ~ [[[2<=Node4DontAnswerToAnyNode & [1<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode2 & Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4]] | [[[1<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3 & Node6FailureProcessedByNode4<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode8] | [3<=Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8 & Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2]] & ~ [2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8]]]]] & [[[Node0Failure<=3 & [[~ [Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=1] & ~ [[1<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode8 & Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=2]]] | [Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=0 & [3<=Node3DontAnswerToAnyNode | [3<=Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8 | Node8HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=1]]]]] & Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3] | ~ [[[~ [[2<=Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6 | Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5]] | ~ [[2<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3 | 1<=Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5]]] | ~ [[~ [Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=Node1Failure] | Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3<=Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0]]]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[[[2<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode5 & [2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4 & [~ [[~ [Node0HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2] | [Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6<=2 | Node3FailureProcessedByNode2<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7]]] | [1<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1 & [Node8HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode6<=2 & [1<=Node5isTheNodeMaster | Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]]]]]] & ~ [[[2<=Node4DontAnswerToAnyNode & [1<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode2 & Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4]] | [~ [2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8] & [[3<=Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8 & Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2] | [1<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3 & Node6FailureProcessedByNode4<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode8]]]]]] & [~ [[~ [[Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3<=Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0 | ~ [Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=Node1Failure]]] | [~ [[2<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3 | 1<=Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5]] | ~ [[2<=Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6 | Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5]]]]] | [Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3 & [Node0Failure<=3 & [[~ [[1<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode8 & Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=2]] & ~ [Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=1]] | [Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=0 & [3<=Node3DontAnswerToAnyNode | [3<=Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8 | Node8HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=1]]]]]]]] | [~ [[[[[~ [Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=1] & [[2<=Node4HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2 | Node5FailureProcessedByNode6<=0] & ~ [Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=0]]] | [Node0HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7<=3 & [2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8 | [Node6FailureProcessedByNode4<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0 & 2<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode4]]]] | [[~ [[3<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode8 & Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode6]] & ~ [Node2FailureProcessedByNode3<=Node7HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8]] | ~ [[~ [1<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4] & [BreakDownReservoir<=0 & Node8HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8]]]]] & [Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=3 & ~ [[[Node2FailureProcessedByNode3<=1 & [LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode7<=0 | Node4Failure<=Node7FailureProcessedByNode3]] & ~ [2<=RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode8]]]]]] | [Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6 | [Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=3 | [[[[[Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1 & 3<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode4] & [Node3DontAnswerToAnyNode<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode2 & 1<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8]] & [[3<=RequestOfNode5IsSentToLx | Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode4<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode7] | ~ [Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8]]] & [Node8HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode0<=3 | [[2<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5 & Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2<=3] | [3<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6 & Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=RequestOfNode5IsSentToRx]]]] | [~ [LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode5<=RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode5] & [Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode6 | [NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3 | LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode7<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode7<=Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 25,660,150 (7)
abstracting: (NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3)
states: 25,088,570 (7)
abstracting: (Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode6)
states: 26,132,852 (7)
abstracting: (LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode5<=RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode5)
states: 25,752,297 (7)
abstracting: (Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=RequestOfNode5IsSentToRx)
states: 26,133,819 (7)
abstracting: (3<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node8HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode0<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6<=Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 25,884,119 (7)
abstracting: (Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode4<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode7)
states: 26,153,474 (7)
abstracting: (3<=RequestOfNode5IsSentToLx)
states: 4
abstracting: (1<=Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 128,477 (5)
abstracting: (Node3DontAnswerToAnyNode<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode2)
states: 26,127,530 (7)
abstracting: (3<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode4)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0<=Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1)
states: 25,873,886 (7)
abstracting: (Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6)
states: 26,132,426 (7)
abstracting: (2<=RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode8)
states: 4,062 (3)
abstracting: (Node4Failure<=Node7FailureProcessedByNode3)
states: 14,185,297 (7)
abstracting: (LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode7<=0)
states: 25,744,849 (7)
abstracting: (Node2FailureProcessedByNode3<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node8HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5<=Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8)
states: 26,133,407 (7)
abstracting: (BreakDownReservoir<=0)
states: 26,091,626 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4)
states: 222,464 (5)
abstracting: (Node2FailureProcessedByNode3<=Node7HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8)
states: 26,029,358 (7)
abstracting: (Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=Node2FailureProcessedByNode6)
states: 26,131,949 (7)
abstracting: (3<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode8)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode4)
states: 2,832 (3)
abstracting: (Node6FailureProcessedByNode4<=Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0)
states: 26,033,406 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node0HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=0)
states: 26,131,938 (7)
abstracting: (Node5FailureProcessedByNode6<=0)
states: 26,026,634 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node4HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node8HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (3<=Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 0
abstracting: (3<=Node3DontAnswerToAnyNode)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8<=0)
states: 26,131,938 (7)
abstracting: (Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<=1)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (1<=NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 1,188,399 (6)
abstracting: (Node0Failure<=3)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node7HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3)
states: 26,044,032 (7)
abstracting: (Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5)
states: 26,133,819 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5)
states: 131,941 (5)
abstracting: (2<=Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4<=Node1Failure)
states: 26,180,830 (7)
abstracting: (Node7HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3<=Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0)
states: 26,132,421 (7)
abstracting: (Node6FailureProcessedByNode4<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode8)
states: 26,035,984 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 131,941 (5)
abstracting: (Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<=Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2)
states: 26,133,390 (7)
abstracting: (3<=Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode0<=Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode4)
states: 26,132,818 (7)
abstracting: (1<=LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode2)
states: 606,032 (5)
abstracting: (2<=Node4DontAnswerToAnyNode)
states: 0
abstracting: (Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode3)
states: 25,873,883 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node5isTheNodeMaster)
states: 3,331,776 (6)
abstracting: (Node8HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode6<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (1<=Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1)
states: 391,446 (5)
abstracting: (Node3FailureProcessedByNode2<=Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7)
states: 26,029,316 (7)
abstracting: (Node0HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6<=2)
states: 26,263,874 (7)
abstracting: (Node0HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode8<=LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2)
states: 26,133,393 (7)
abstracting: (2<=Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=Node3FailureProcessedByNode5)
states: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-ReachabilityCardinality-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 1m27.875sec

totally nodes used: 59831925 (6.0e+07)
number of garbage collections: 0
fire ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 244543214 1736332424 1980875638
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 67108864 0 16 1024MB
basic ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 93969755 586087378 680057133
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 16777216 0 12 192MB
unary ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 8 128MB
abstract ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 12 192MB
state nr cache: hits/miss/sum: 18354080 41897248 60251328
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 8306636 81972 32 256MB
max state cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 8388608 32 256MB
uniqueHash elements/entry size/size: 67108864 4 256MB
0 28136232
1 23822290
2 10731267
3 3377606
4 834498
5 171647
6 29948
7 4710
8 601
9 61
>= 10 4

Total processing time: 17m29.378sec


BK_STOP 1679506691104

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination ReachabilityCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
check for maximal unmarked siphon
ok
check for constant places
ok
check if there are places and transitions
ok
check if there are transitions without pre-places
ok
check if at least one transition is enabled in m0
ok
check if there are transitions that can never fire
ok


initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec

290972 480537
iterations count:245882 (601), effective:5513 (13)

initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:888 (2), effective:5 (0)

iterations count:2301 (5), effective:15 (0)

iterations count:2558 (6), effective:29 (0)

iterations count:734 (1), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:3870 (9), effective:38 (0)

iterations count:2176 (5), effective:16 (0)

iterations count:1238 (3), effective:8 (0)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="marciexred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool marciexred"
echo " Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r234-tall-167856420300462"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3.tgz
mv LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3 execution
cd execution
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME ReachabilityCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;