fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r229-tall-167856413300458
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
15572.604 3600000.00 3653189.00 26249.30 TT?FFFTTFT?FFTTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r229-tall-167856413300458.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r229-tall-167856413300458
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 812K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Feb 25 16:54 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K Feb 25 16:54 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Feb 25 16:54 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K Feb 25 16:54 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K Feb 25 16:20 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Feb 25 16:20 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Feb 25 16:20 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Feb 25 16:20 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Feb 25 16:55 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 148K Feb 25 16:55 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 16:55 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K Feb 25 16:55 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Feb 25 16:20 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K Feb 25 16:20 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 254K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1679489678840

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-22 12:54:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-22 12:54:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-22 12:54:40] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 57 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:40] [INFO ] Transformed 462 places.
[2023-03-22 12:54:40] [INFO ] Transformed 409 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:40] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 462 places and 409 transitions and 1324 arcs in 118 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 146 out of 462 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 462/462 places, 409/409 transitions.
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 377 transition count 409
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 333 transition count 365
Iterating global reduction 1 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 333 transition count 365
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 318 transition count 350
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 318 transition count 350
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 210 place count 311 transition count 343
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 311 transition count 343
Applied a total of 217 rules in 68 ms. Remains 311 /462 variables (removed 151) and now considering 343/409 (removed 66) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 343 rows 311 cols
[2023-03-22 12:54:40] [INFO ] Computed 30 place invariants in 27 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 296 ms returned [128, 197]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 321 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 309/462 places, 343/409 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 309 /309 variables (removed 0) and now considering 343/343 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 393 ms. Remains : 309/462 places, 343/409 transitions.
Support contains 146 out of 309 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 343 transitions.
Support contains 145 out of 309 places (down from 146) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 377 resets, run finished after 535 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 107) seen :98
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 38 ms. (steps per millisecond=263 ) properties (out of 9) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 76 resets, run finished after 45 ms. (steps per millisecond=222 ) properties (out of 8) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 59 resets, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=270 ) properties (out of 7) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 75 resets, run finished after 35 ms. (steps per millisecond=285 ) properties (out of 6) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 76 resets, run finished after 33 ms. (steps per millisecond=303 ) properties (out of 5) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 64 resets, run finished after 38 ms. (steps per millisecond=263 ) properties (out of 4) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=666 ) properties (out of 3) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 63 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=588 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=666 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 343 rows 309 cols
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 7 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 28 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] After 125ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:1
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] After 158ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:1
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 29 ms.
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] After 320ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:1
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 28 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] After 118ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] After 174ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 41 ms.
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] After 308ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
Finished Parikh walk after 9 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=4 )
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 5 ms.
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 343 transitions.
Computed a total of 309 stabilizing places and 343 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 309 transition count 343
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 2 formulas.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 742 edges and 309 vertex of which 308 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 86 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 86 transitions
Performed 86 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 86
Iterating post reduction 0 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 308 transition count 256
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 222 transition count 256
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 222 transition count 239
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 205 transition count 239
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 181 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 181 transition count 215
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 171 transition count 205
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 290 place count 156 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 156 transition count 190
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 156 transition count 189
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 155 transition count 189
Applied a total of 307 rules in 51 ms. Remains 155 /309 variables (removed 154) and now considering 189/343 (removed 154) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 189 rows 155 cols
[2023-03-22 12:54:42] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned [3, 8, 15, 18, 23, 30, 33, 38, 45, 48, 53, 60, 63, 68, 75, 78, 83, 90, 97, 104, 107, 112, 119, 122, 127, 134]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 140 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/309 places, 189/343 transitions.
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 129 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 111 transition count 171
Discarding 69 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 69 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 42 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 42 transition count 102
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 189 place count 27 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 27 transition count 87
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 26 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 25 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 25 transition count 85
Applied a total of 208 rules in 16 ms. Remains 25 /129 variables (removed 104) and now considering 85/189 (removed 104) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 23 transitions (discarded 62 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 25 cols
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 23 transitions (discarded 62 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 25/309 places, 85/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 280 ms. Remains : 25/309 places, 85/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5361880817896165647.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16990301092377870079.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5361880817896165647.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16990301092377870079.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5288,0.045018,5024,2,633,5,9135,6,0,176,5536,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((Node3IsActive<1)||(Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((Node3IsActive<1)||(Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode<1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 68/0/17
(forward)formula 0,1,0.133068,8444,1,0,21,25977,18,4,821,19618,18
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 742 edges and 309 vertex of which 308 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 74 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 74 transitions
Performed 74 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 74
Iterating post reduction 0 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 308 transition count 268
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 81 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 234 transition count 261
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 227 transition count 261
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 227 transition count 246
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 212 transition count 246
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 189 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 189 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 240 place count 188 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 188 transition count 222
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 179 transition count 213
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 272 place count 166 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 166 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 286 place count 165 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 165 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 164 transition count 199
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 163 transition count 198
Applied a total of 290 rules in 52 ms. Remains 163 /309 variables (removed 146) and now considering 198/343 (removed 145) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 198 rows 163 cols
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Computed 27 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned [3, 8, 18, 23, 30, 40, 48, 51, 56, 63, 66, 80, 83, 95, 102, 109, 112, 127, 130, 135, 142]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/309 places, 198/343 transitions.
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 142 transition count 189
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 133 transition count 189
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 79 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 79 transition count 135
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 68 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 68 transition count 124
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 60 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 60 transition count 116
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 51 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 50 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 50 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 49 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 49 transition count 105
Applied a total of 186 rules in 15 ms. Remains 49 /142 variables (removed 93) and now considering 105/198 (removed 93) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 61 transitions (discarded 44 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 49 cols
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 61 transitions (discarded 44 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 49/309 places, 105/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 271 ms. Remains : 49/309 places, 105/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13298131944174186168.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10455436839891632467.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13298131944174186168.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10455436839891632467.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,56623,0.137828,9424,2,2554,5,29058,6,0,292,24314,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((!(A(AG(((RequestOfNode5IsSentToRx>=1)&&(RxIsActiveAndNotInTheLeafSet>=1))) U ((!((Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3>=1)&&(Le...565
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(!((E(!(((!((Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode2>=1)...983
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t12, t13, t14, t18, t19, t20, t21, t24, t25, t26, t27, t...522
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,2.08938,76504,1,0,403,417602,252,165,2006,403086,353
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 267 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 267 transition count 301
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 237 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 237 transition count 271
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 236 transition count 271
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 214 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 214 transition count 249
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 9 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 205 transition count 249
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 197 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 197 transition count 241
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 221 place count 190 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 190 transition count 234
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 235 place count 183 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 183 transition count 227
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 249 place count 176 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 176 transition count 220
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 275 place count 157 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 157 transition count 201
Applied a total of 294 rules in 36 ms. Remains 157 /309 variables (removed 152) and now considering 201/343 (removed 142) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 182 transitions (discarded 19 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 182 rows 157 cols
[2023-03-22 12:54:45] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [22, 32, 52, 56, 77, 114, 121, 136, 140]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/309 places, 201/343 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 120 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 120 transition count 173
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 119 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 119 transition count 172
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 118 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 118 transition count 171
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 117 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 117 transition count 170
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 116 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 116 transition count 169
Applied a total of 64 rules in 9 ms. Remains 116 /148 variables (removed 32) and now considering 169/201 (removed 32) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 142 transitions (discarded 27 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 142 rows 116 cols
[2023-03-22 12:54:45] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:54:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 142 transitions (discarded 27 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:54:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:54:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 116/309 places, 169/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 271 ms. Remains : 116/309 places, 169/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 169 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:54:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13174096105017639421.gal : 5 ms
[2023-03-22 12:54:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13434911841173953312.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13174096105017639421.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13434911841173953312.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.81503e+06,1.28661,48408,2,12934,5,165194,6,0,623,292323,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(EX(((!(((Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode4>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5>=1))) * E(((Node0DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node5IsA...1148
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((((!((E(!(((Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode3>=1)...9440
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t18, t19, t20, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t29, t30, t3...624
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 12:55:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 12:55:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6056451802319263260.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6056451802319263260.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6056451802319263260.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6056451802319263260.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6056451802319263260.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 12:55:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 12:55:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 12:55:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 98 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:55:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 15 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2023-03-22 12:55:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18245284468920590073.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7172026449847521819.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18245284468920590073.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7172026449847521819.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.81503e+06,2.70353,86160,4466,1535,109945,19512,486,478042,124,134809,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(EX(((!(((i0.i0.u20.Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode4>=1)&&(i0.i0.u21.LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5>=1))) * E(((i1.u5.Node0DontAnsw...1361
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((((!((E(!(((i0.i2.u12.Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8>=1)&&(i0.i2.u30.LeafSetO...11145
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t12, t14, t23, t35, t38, t39, t41, t42, t51, t52, t66, t70, t80, t83, t88, t89, t92,...844
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 262 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 262 transition count 296
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 224 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 224 transition count 258
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 223 transition count 258
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 199 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 199 transition count 234
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 13 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 186 transition count 234
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 245 place count 173 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 173 transition count 221
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 160 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 160 transition count 208
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 296 place count 148 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 148 transition count 196
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 321 place count 135 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 135 transition count 183
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 373 place count 96 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 2 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 96 transition count 144
Applied a total of 412 rules in 30 ms. Remains 96 /309 variables (removed 213) and now considering 144/343 (removed 199) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 104 transitions (discarded 40 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 96 cols
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned [23, 34, 44, 48, 52, 56, 64, 69, 73, 77, 85]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 104 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/309 places, 144/343 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 61 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 61 transition count 120
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 59 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 59 transition count 118
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 57 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 57 transition count 116
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 55 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 55 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 53 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 53 transition count 112
Applied a total of 64 rules in 3 ms. Remains 53 /85 variables (removed 32) and now considering 112/144 (removed 32) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 62 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 53 cols
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 62 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 53/309 places, 112/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 251 ms. Remains : 53/309 places, 112/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 112 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10659855813051800231.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14783507556908292234.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10659855813051800231.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14783507556908292234.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,210141,0.231842,12620,2,2638,5,43214,6,0,314,48010,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EF(AG(EF(((Node2IsActive>=1)&&(Node4DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))))) + (((Node0HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode7>=1) + AG((Node8ManageTheBre...291
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((Node2IsActive>=1)&&(Node4DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)))))))))...497
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t12, t14, t19, t20, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, t32, t34, t35, t36...535
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,5.49334,162920,1,0,466,903236,258,193,2110,1.0553e+06,406
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 742 edges and 309 vertex of which 308 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 82 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 82 transitions
Performed 82 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 82
Iterating post reduction 0 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 308 transition count 260
Reduce places removed 82 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 226 transition count 260
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 226 transition count 243
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 209 transition count 243
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 224 place count 184 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 184 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 183 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 183 transition count 217
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 173 transition count 207
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 286 place count 158 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 158 transition count 192
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 158 transition count 191
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 157 transition count 191
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 304 place count 156 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 156 transition count 190
Applied a total of 305 rules in 31 ms. Remains 156 /309 variables (removed 153) and now considering 190/343 (removed 153) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 190 rows 156 cols
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned [3, 8, 15, 18, 23, 30, 33, 38, 45, 48, 53, 60, 63, 69, 76, 79, 84, 91, 98, 105, 108, 113, 120, 123, 128, 135]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 114 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 130/309 places, 190/343 transitions.
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 130 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 112 transition count 172
Discarding 69 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 69 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 43 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 43 transition count 103
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 29 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 29 transition count 89
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 28 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 27 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 27 transition count 87
Applied a total of 206 rules in 9 ms. Remains 27 /130 variables (removed 103) and now considering 87/190 (removed 103) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 58 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 27 cols
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 58 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 27/309 places, 87/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 218 ms. Remains : 27/309 places, 87/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4707633223199134651.gal : 0 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8979120117032524727.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4707633223199134651.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8979120117032524727.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8872,0.033192,4872,2,758,5,7523,6,0,186,4780,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((Node0IsActive>=1)&&(Node6DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) * (E(!(((RequestOfNode4IsSentToRx>=1)&&(RxIsActiveAndNotInTheLeafSet>=1))) U (...266
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((Node0IsActive>=1)&&(Node6DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) * (E(!(((RequestOfNode4IsSen...326
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21, t22, t...517
(forward)formula 0,0,0.308618,16676,1,0,333,83500,207,128,1233,74938,268
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 742 edges and 309 vertex of which 308 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 56 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 56 transitions
Performed 56 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 56
Iterating post reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 308 transition count 286
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 1 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 252 transition count 269
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 235 transition count 269
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 235 transition count 255
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 221 transition count 255
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 204 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 204 transition count 238
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 211 place count 202 transition count 236
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 202 transition count 236
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 194 transition count 228
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 180 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 180 transition count 214
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 178 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 178 transition count 212
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 176 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 264 place count 175 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 175 transition count 211
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 174 transition count 210
Applied a total of 267 rules in 38 ms. Remains 174 /309 variables (removed 135) and now considering 210/343 (removed 133) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 174 cols
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [3, 15, 18, 35, 40, 47, 59, 67, 77, 85, 103, 110, 117, 127, 134, 137]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 158/309 places, 210/343 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 158 transition count 207
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 155 transition count 207
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 118 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 118 transition count 170
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 111 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 111 transition count 163
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 102 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 102 transition count 154
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 84 transition count 136
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 83 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 83 transition count 135
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 82 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 82 transition count 134
Applied a total of 152 rules in 12 ms. Remains 82 /158 variables (removed 76) and now considering 134/210 (removed 76) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 108 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 82 cols
[2023-03-22 12:55:52] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:55:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 108 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:55:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:55:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 82/309 places, 134/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 261 ms. Remains : 82/309 places, 134/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:55:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 134 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:55:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2089620523490373208.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:55:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2908879135177551075.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2089620523490373208.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2908879135177551075.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,252482,0.650144,27872,2,10091,5,94339,6,0,453,129739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(EG(AG(A(((Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode3>=1)) U ((RequestOfNode5IsSentToRx>=1)&&(RxIsActiveA...994
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((RequestOfNode5IsSentToRx>=1)&&(RxIsActiveAndNotInTheLeafSet>=1))) U (!(((...1703
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t17, t31, t37, t43, t44, t45, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64...564
(forward)formula 0,0,13.5229,333964,1,0,455,1.68748e+06,303,188,3262,2.01193e+06,394
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 742 edges and 309 vertex of which 308 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 77 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 77 transitions
Performed 77 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 77
Iterating post reduction 0 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 308 transition count 265
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 231 transition count 258
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 224 transition count 258
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 224 transition count 242
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 208 transition count 242
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 224 place count 185 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 185 transition count 219
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 175 transition count 209
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 282 place count 160 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 160 transition count 194
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 160 transition count 193
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 159 transition count 193
Applied a total of 299 rules in 26 ms. Remains 159 /309 variables (removed 150) and now considering 193/343 (removed 150) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 159 cols
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [3, 8, 15, 25, 33, 36, 41, 48, 51, 56, 63, 66, 71, 78, 81, 86, 93, 100, 110, 115, 122, 125, 130, 138]
Discarding 24 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 99 ms to find 24 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/309 places, 193/343 transitions.
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 135 transition count 183
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 125 transition count 183
Discarding 58 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 58 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 67 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 67 transition count 125
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 53 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 53 transition count 111
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 176 place count 41 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 41 transition count 99
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 38 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 37 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 37 transition count 95
Applied a total of 196 rules in 8 ms. Remains 37 /135 variables (removed 98) and now considering 95/193 (removed 98) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 40 transitions (discarded 55 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 37 cols
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 40 transitions (discarded 55 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 37/309 places, 95/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 211 ms. Remains : 37/309 places, 95/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9032156990677382576.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14774014047584288400.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9032156990677382576.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14774014047584288400.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17173,0.035735,4612,2,614,5,6383,6,0,234,5076,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((Node8ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7>=1) + AF(((Node2WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<1)||(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<1)))) + ((Node...230
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((Node1HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode3>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode1>=1)))) * ...288
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,0.16541,10420,1,0,31,38556,17,6,1126,31882,25
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 742 edges and 309 vertex of which 308 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 85 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 85 transitions
Performed 85 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 85
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 308 transition count 257
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 223 transition count 257
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 223 transition count 240
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 206 transition count 240
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 182 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 182 transition count 216
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 172 transition count 206
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 288 place count 157 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 157 transition count 191
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 157 transition count 190
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 156 transition count 190
Applied a total of 305 rules in 23 ms. Remains 156 /309 variables (removed 153) and now considering 190/343 (removed 153) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 190 rows 156 cols
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Computed 28 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned [4, 9, 16, 19, 24, 31, 34, 39, 46, 49, 54, 61, 64, 69, 76, 79, 84, 91, 98, 105, 108, 113, 120, 123, 128, 135]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 105 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 130/309 places, 190/343 transitions.
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 130 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 113 transition count 173
Discarding 68 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 68 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 45 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 45 transition count 105
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 30 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 30 transition count 90
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 28 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 27 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 27 transition count 87
Applied a total of 206 rules in 8 ms. Remains 27 /130 variables (removed 103) and now considering 87/190 (removed 103) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 26 transitions (discarded 61 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 27 cols
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 26 transitions (discarded 61 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 27/309 places, 87/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 201 ms. Remains : 27/309 places, 87/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1515458013141200697.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8496694807661561375.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1515458013141200697.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8496694807661561375.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6296,0.033209,4604,2,599,5,6685,6,0,186,3819,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 85/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.127647,8828,1,0,21,28362,18,2,900,19972,20
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 742 edges and 309 vertex of which 308 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 54 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 54 transitions
Performed 54 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 54
Iterating post reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 308 transition count 288
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 1 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 254 transition count 266
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 232 transition count 266
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 232 transition count 251
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 217 transition count 251
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 196 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 196 transition count 230
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 193 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 193 transition count 227
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 184 transition count 218
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 263 place count 170 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 170 transition count 204
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 278 place count 169 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 169 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 168 transition count 203
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 167 transition count 202
Applied a total of 282 rules in 42 ms. Remains 167 /309 variables (removed 142) and now considering 202/343 (removed 141) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 167 cols
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Computed 27 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned [3, 8, 18, 23, 41, 49, 59, 77, 84, 92, 106, 113, 116, 131, 134, 139, 146]
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 17 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 150/309 places, 202/343 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 150 transition count 200
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 148 transition count 200
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 118 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 118 transition count 170
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 108 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 108 transition count 160
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 93 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 93 transition count 145
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 82 transition count 134
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 81 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 81 transition count 133
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 79 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 79 transition count 131
Applied a total of 142 rules in 13 ms. Remains 79 /150 variables (removed 71) and now considering 131/202 (removed 71) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 97 transitions (discarded 34 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 79 cols
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 97 transitions (discarded 34 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 79/309 places, 131/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 259 ms. Remains : 79/309 places, 131/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 131 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2542684313612917082.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14570550052796616277.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2542684313612917082.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14570550052796616277.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,156009,0.996383,39324,2,9986,5,131818,6,0,438,157318,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1)&&(Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1)) U A(((((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode3>=1)&&(Node7W...997
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((!(EG(!((E(((RequestOfNode5IsSentToLx>=1)&&(LxIsActiveAndNotInTheLeafSet>=1)) U ((Node2H...6843
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t13, t21, t26, t30, t33, t36, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73...539
(forward)formula 0,0,8.40221,225568,1,0,385,1.10693e+06,307,153,3019,1.04451e+06,340
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 264 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 264 transition count 298
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 229 transition count 263
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 229 transition count 263
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 228 transition count 263
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 204 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 204 transition count 239
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 11 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 193 transition count 239
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 182 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 182 transition count 228
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 253 place count 171 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 171 transition count 217
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 275 place count 160 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 160 transition count 206
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 298 place count 148 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 148 transition count 194
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 342 place count 116 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 116 transition count 162
Applied a total of 374 rules in 21 ms. Remains 116 /309 variables (removed 193) and now considering 162/343 (removed 181) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 33 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 116 cols
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [31, 41, 47, 51, 79, 83, 87, 103]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 76 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/309 places, 162/343 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 93 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 93 transition count 147
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 91 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 91 transition count 145
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 89 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 89 transition count 143
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 87 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 87 transition count 141
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 83 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 83 transition count 137
Applied a total of 50 rules in 4 ms. Remains 83 /108 variables (removed 25) and now considering 137/162 (removed 25) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 43 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 83 cols
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 43 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 83/309 places, 137/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 217 ms. Remains : 83/309 places, 137/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14940101246519374802.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability166507097581904303.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14940101246519374802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability166507097581904303.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,467972,0.863092,31484,2,7154,5,116221,6,0,459,174245,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF((AG((Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<1)) * AX(((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1)&&(Node8WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1))))...614
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !((Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1<1)))) * !(EX(!(((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfN...693
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t16, t17, t18, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t34, t35, t36, t37, t4...527
(forward)formula 0,1,9.80446,259592,1,0,467,1.34835e+06,312,198,3189,1.44332e+06,425
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 742 edges and 309 vertex of which 308 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 308 transition count 294
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 1 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 260 transition count 278
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 244 transition count 278
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 244 transition count 267
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 233 transition count 267
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 217 transition count 251
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 217 transition count 251
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 215 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 215 transition count 249
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 206 transition count 240
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 195 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 195 transition count 229
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 193 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 193 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 192 transition count 227
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 191 transition count 226
Applied a total of 234 rules in 42 ms. Remains 191 /309 variables (removed 118) and now considering 226/343 (removed 117) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 226 rows 191 cols
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Computed 27 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned [22, 63, 73, 80, 83, 88, 95, 105, 113, 131, 142, 149]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 110 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 179/309 places, 226/343 transitions.
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 179 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 173 transition count 220
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 145 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 145 transition count 192
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 142 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 142 transition count 189
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 137 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 137 transition count 184
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 116 transition count 163
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 115 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 115 transition count 162
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 114 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 114 transition count 161
Applied a total of 130 rules in 12 ms. Remains 114 /179 variables (removed 65) and now considering 161/226 (removed 65) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 148 transitions (discarded 13 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 114 cols
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 148 transitions (discarded 13 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 114/309 places, 161/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 324 ms. Remains : 114/309 places, 161/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 161 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5670398761054416419.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4463378482604329546.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5670398761054416419.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4463378482604329546.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,728772,2.524,81632,2,31642,5,282961,6,0,608,473251,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((!((!((((Node8HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode1>=1)||(Node3HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode0>=1))||(((Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode5...1386
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1)))))) * !(E(!(...1651
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t10, t13, t20, t22, t36, t38, t41, t43, t47, t51, t52, t53, t54, t75, t76, t77, t78, ...618
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 12:56:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 12:56:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16785754951741745723.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16785754951741745723.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16785754951741745723.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16785754951741745723.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16785754951741745723.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 12:56:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 12:56:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 12:56:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 121 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:56:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 17 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-22 12:56:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16857090158348597666.gal : 11 ms
[2023-03-22 12:56:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2393079903870943786.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16857090158348597666.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2393079903870943786.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,728772,14.9916,368456,25504,3437,506199,34784,536,2.03504e+06,160,722366,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 265 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 265 transition count 299
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 228 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 228 transition count 262
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 227 transition count 262
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 202 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 202 transition count 237
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 13 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 189 transition count 237
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 177 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 177 transition count 225
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 261 place count 166 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 166 transition count 214
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 282 place count 156 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 156 transition count 204
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 302 place count 146 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 146 transition count 194
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 342 place count 116 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 116 transition count 164
Applied a total of 372 rules in 33 ms. Remains 116 /309 variables (removed 193) and now considering 164/343 (removed 179) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 134 transitions (discarded 30 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 134 rows 116 cols
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [23, 33, 42, 54, 67, 87, 94, 99, 103]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 81 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/309 places, 164/343 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 83 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 83 transition count 140
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 82 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 82 transition count 139
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 81 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 81 transition count 138
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 80 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 80 transition count 137
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 79 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 79 transition count 136
Applied a total of 56 rules in 4 ms. Remains 79 /107 variables (removed 28) and now considering 136/164 (removed 28) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 38 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 79 cols
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 38 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 79/309 places, 136/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 227 ms. Remains : 79/309 places, 136/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1155472615975980373.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13903156832844440233.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1155472615975980373.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13903156832844440233.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,666533,0.440308,20296,2,4742,5,67315,6,0,442,100115,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(AX((AG((((Node5DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node7IsActive>=1))&&(LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode2>=1))) + (Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode5>=...813
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!((E(!(EG(((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1)&&(Node7WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1)))) U...1502
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t19, t20, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, t28, t30, t31, t32, t...599
(forward)formula 0,0,11.6556,305828,1,0,675,1.75396e+06,322,320,2874,2.01708e+06,593
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 268 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 268 transition count 302
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 235 transition count 269
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 235 transition count 269
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 234 transition count 269
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 170 place count 213 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 213 transition count 248
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 207 transition count 248
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 201 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 201 transition count 242
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 196 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 196 transition count 237
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 224 place count 191 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 191 transition count 232
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 235 place count 185 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 185 transition count 226
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 171 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 171 transition count 212
Applied a total of 269 rules in 16 ms. Remains 171 /309 variables (removed 138) and now considering 212/343 (removed 131) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 197 transitions (discarded 15 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 171 cols
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned [10, 21, 32, 37, 45, 55, 68, 78, 92, 105, 109, 116, 126, 130, 152]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 109 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 156/309 places, 212/343 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 118 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 118 transition count 174
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 112 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 112 transition count 168
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 107 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 107 transition count 163
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 102 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 102 transition count 158
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 97 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 97 transition count 153
Applied a total of 118 rules in 4 ms. Remains 97 /156 variables (removed 59) and now considering 153/212 (removed 59) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 32 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 97 cols
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 32 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 97/309 places, 153/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 277 ms. Remains : 97/309 places, 153/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 153 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10720196419517177992.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:57:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11317515773016390501.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10720196419517177992.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11317515773016390501.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.0705e+06,0.322802,15804,2,8153,5,47052,6,0,531,53539,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(((EG((((Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6>=1)&&(RequestOfNode2IsSentToRx>=1))&&(RxIsActiveAndNotInTheLeafSet>=1))) + !((((Node7ManageTh...1017
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(((EG((((Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6>=1)&&(RequestOfNode2IsSentToRx>=1))&&(RxIsActiveAndNotInTh...1287
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t12, t16, t17, t18, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t27, t28, t29, t31, t32, t33...581
(forward)formula 0,0,24.9982,706584,1,0,697,4.33263e+06,371,316,3651,4.55188e+06,655
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 267 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 267 transition count 301
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 235 transition count 269
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 235 transition count 269
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 234 transition count 269
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 172 place count 211 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 211 transition count 246
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 9 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 202 transition count 246
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 193 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 193 transition count 237
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 184 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 184 transition count 228
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 248 place count 176 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 176 transition count 220
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 167 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 167 transition count 211
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 296 place count 145 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 145 transition count 189
Applied a total of 318 rules in 21 ms. Remains 145 /309 variables (removed 164) and now considering 189/343 (removed 154) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 166 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 145 cols
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned [19, 39, 55, 60, 68, 92, 116, 122, 126, 130]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/309 places, 189/343 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 103 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 103 transition count 157
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 102 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 102 transition count 156
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 101 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 101 transition count 155
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 100 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 100 transition count 154
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 99 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 99 transition count 153
Applied a total of 72 rules in 4 ms. Remains 99 /135 variables (removed 36) and now considering 153/189 (removed 36) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 32 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 99 cols
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 32 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 99/309 places, 153/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 238 ms. Remains : 99/309 places, 153/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 153 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15077336670741686886.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11941660210948252164.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15077336670741686886.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11941660210948252164.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.3231e+06,0.342842,18996,2,6671,5,60825,6,0,539,85066,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8>=1)) + E((((EF(((Node5IsActive>=1)&&(Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))) + AF(((Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToR...853
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E((((E(TRUE U ((Node5IsActive>=1)&&(Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))) + !(EG(!(((Node4HasAskedItsLe...925
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t14, t15, t16, t22, t23, t26, t27, t28, t29, t32, t33, t34, t36, t37,...588
(forward)formula 0,1,10.84,365524,1,0,649,2.11435e+06,367,298,3539,2.36654e+06,585
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 261 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 261 transition count 295
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 222 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 222 transition count 256
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 221 transition count 256
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 194 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 194 transition count 229
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 16 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 178 transition count 229
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 260 place count 163 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 163 transition count 214
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 290 place count 148 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 148 transition count 199
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 320 place count 133 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 133 transition count 184
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 350 place count 118 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 118 transition count 169
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 416 place count 67 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 2 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 467 place count 67 transition count 118
Applied a total of 467 rules in 13 ms. Remains 67 /309 variables (removed 242) and now considering 118/343 (removed 225) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 49 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 67 cols
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [19, 24, 38, 42, 46, 50, 54, 58]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/309 places, 118/343 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 44 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 44 transition count 103
Applied a total of 30 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /59 variables (removed 15) and now considering 103/118 (removed 15) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 54 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 44 cols
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 54 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/309 places, 103/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 145 ms. Remains : 44/309 places, 103/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14535900687850933608.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17640420770469436796.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14535900687850933608.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17640420770469436796.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,124184,0.053293,5460,2,1112,5,10905,6,0,269,10114,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(!(A(((Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode2>=1)) U (LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode2>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(!((E(!((LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode2>=1)) U (!(((Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2>=1)&&(...294
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t7, t8, t9, t10, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t29, t32, t33...506
(forward)formula 0,1,2.07474,83316,1,0,508,468312,235,228,1725,544173,432
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 343/343 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 262 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 262 transition count 296
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 224 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 224 transition count 258
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 223 transition count 258
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 198 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 198 transition count 233
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 14 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 184 transition count 233
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 249 place count 170 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 170 transition count 219
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 156 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 156 transition count 205
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 305 place count 142 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 142 transition count 191
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 334 place count 127 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 349 place count 127 transition count 176
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 395 place count 81 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 441 place count 81 transition count 130
Applied a total of 441 rules in 38 ms. Remains 81 /309 variables (removed 228) and now considering 130/343 (removed 213) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 46 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 81 cols
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned [19, 28, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 67, 71]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 82 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/309 places, 130/343 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 56 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 56 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 55 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 55 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 54 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 54 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 53 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 53 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 52 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 52 transition count 110
Applied a total of 40 rules in 3 ms. Remains 52 /72 variables (removed 20) and now considering 110/130 (removed 20) transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 54 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 52 cols
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 54 similar events)
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/309 places, 110/343 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 226 ms. Remains : 52/309 places, 110/343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1127446705896750291.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12472375758725358191.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1127446705896750291.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12472375758725358191.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,157999,0.401164,21056,2,5547,5,87489,6,0,308,74227,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(((AX(((Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1))) * AG(((Node5DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node8...314
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((Node6IsActive>=1)&&(Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) * !(EX(!((Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<1...621
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t28, t30, t31...513
(forward)formula 0,0,6.69913,237700,1,0,450,1.31084e+06,253,207,2039,1.31574e+06,376
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2023-03-22 12:58:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 12:58:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7634923418753131353.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7634923418753131353.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7634923418753131353.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7634923418753131353.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7634923418753131353.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 12:58:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 12:58:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 12:58:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 256 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 12:58:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 7 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2023-03-22 12:58:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14367266777641196850.gal : 21 ms
[2023-03-22 12:58:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8496994025999223752.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14367266777641196850.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8496994025999223752.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06519e+07,219.081,2228648,177828,4564,2.47106e+06,279289,1123,1.34838e+07,160,6.44095e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(EX(((!(((i10.u55.Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode4>=1)&&(i13.u87.LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5>=1))) * E(((i2.u10.Node0DontAnswerT...1381
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((((!((E(!(((i5.i0.u37.Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8>=1)&&(i13.u38.LeafSetOfR...11285
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t14, t23, t28, t45, t49, t56, t71, t75, t83, t87, t110, t119, t126, t128, t130, t134, t15...979
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2023-03-22 13:13:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-22 13:13:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability862836608333046516.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:13:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11287124442397050272.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability862836608333046516.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11287124442397050272.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06519e+07,24.4467,660852,2,199823,5,2.06621e+06,6,0,1569,3.8187e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(EX(((!(((Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode4>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5>=1))) * E(((Node0DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node5IsA...1148
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((((!((E(!(((Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode3>=1)...9440
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t10, t14, t19, t21, t23, t24, t28, t33, t35, t41, t44, t45, t49, t52, t55, t56, t60, ...663
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 13:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 343 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:34:27] [INFO ] Transformed 309 places.
[2023-03-22 13:34:27] [INFO ] Transformed 343 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2023-03-22 13:34:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5356006046952216875.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6871386487468406097.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5356006046952216875.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6871386487468406097.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...328
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06519e+07,58.1798,1614368,2,230663,5,5.07672e+06,6,0,1569,6.51872e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(EX(((!(((Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode4>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5>=1))) * E(((Node0DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node5IsA...1148
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((((!((E(!(((Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode3>=1)...9440
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t10, t14, t19, t21, t23, t24, t28, t33, t35, t41, t44, t45, t49, t52, t55, t56, t60, ...663
TIME LIMIT: Killed by timeout after 3600 seconds
MemTotal: 16393216 kB
MemFree: 715448 kB
After kill :
MemTotal: 16393216 kB
MemFree: 15733272 kB

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r229-tall-167856413300458"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3.tgz
mv LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;