Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r101-tall-167814475100234.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r101-tall-167814475100234
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 844K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Feb 26 15:35 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K Feb 26 15:35 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K Feb 26 15:34 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Feb 26 15:34 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Feb 25 15:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Feb 25 15:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Feb 25 15:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 15:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 26 15:36 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 105K Feb 26 15:36 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K Feb 26 15:35 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K Feb 26 15:35 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Feb 25 15:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 15:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 432K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678239624298

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-08 01:40:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-08 01:40:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-08 01:40:26] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 101 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:26] [INFO ] Transformed 1440 places.
[2023-03-08 01:40:26] [INFO ] Transformed 672 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:40:26] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1440 places and 672 transitions and 2688 arcs in 174 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1093 places in 6 ms
Reduce places removed 1093 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 347 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 347/347 places, 672/672 transitions.
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 80 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 80 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 101 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 326 transition count 592
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 269 transition count 507
Iterating global reduction 1 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 269 transition count 507
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 269 transition count 498
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 262 place count 231 transition count 460
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 231 transition count 460
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 314 place count 217 transition count 441
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 217 transition count 441
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 217 transition count 428
Applied a total of 341 rules in 69 ms. Remains 217 /347 variables (removed 130) and now considering 428/672 (removed 244) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 428 rows 217 cols
[2023-03-08 01:40:26] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 24 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 292 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:40:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:40:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 240 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:40:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 678 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 995 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:40:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:40:27] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 164 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 217/347 places, 428/672 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1232 ms. Remains : 217/347 places, 428/672 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 217 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-08 01:40:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 428 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2298 resets, run finished after 527 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 ) properties (out of 71) seen :15
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 56) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 56) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 101 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 86 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 87 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 80 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 105 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 88 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 152 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 96 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 91 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 55) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 55 properties.
[2023-03-08 01:40:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:40:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:40:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:40:29] [INFO ] After 363ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:55
[2023-03-08 01:40:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:40:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 01:40:32] [INFO ] After 2558ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :54
[2023-03-08 01:40:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 240 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:40:37] [INFO ] After 5223ms SMT Verify possible using 240 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :54
[2023-03-08 01:40:42] [INFO ] After 10389ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :54
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 5212 ms.
[2023-03-08 01:40:48] [INFO ] After 18654ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :54
Fused 55 Parikh solutions to 54 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 668 ms.
Support contains 70 out of 217 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 214 transition count 417
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 214 transition count 417
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 212 transition count 415
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 212 transition count 415
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 212 transition count 413
Applied a total of 12 rules in 70 ms. Remains 212 /217 variables (removed 5) and now considering 413/428 (removed 15) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 70 ms. Remains : 212/217 places, 413/428 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2257 resets, run finished after 313 ms. (steps per millisecond=31 ) properties (out of 54) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 101 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 117 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 112 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 53) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 156 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 88 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 105 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 65038 states, properties seen :49
Probabilistic random walk after 166609 steps, saw 65038 distinct states, run finished after 1129 ms. (steps per millisecond=147 ) properties seen :49
Explored full state space saw : 65203 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 166840 steps, saw 65203 distinct states, run finished after 699 ms. (steps per millisecond=238 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-08 01:40:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 428 transitions.
Support contains 79 out of 217 places (down from 84) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 852 edges and 217 vertex of which 216 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 171 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 171 transition count 266
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 171 transition count 261
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 133 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 133 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 133 transition count 205
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 112 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 112 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 112 transition count 161
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 102 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 102 transition count 143
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 102 transition count 141
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 265 place count 95 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 95 transition count 134
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 95 transition count 131
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 280 place count 90 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 90 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 90 transition count 118
Applied a total of 287 rules in 18 ms. Remains 90 /217 variables (removed 127) and now considering 118/428 (removed 310) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 90 cols
[2023-03-08 01:40:51] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:40:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:40:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:40:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 210 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:40:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:40:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/217 places, 118/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 288 ms. Remains : 90/217 places, 118/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:40:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:40:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16032134003028628849.gal : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13836263287313833149.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16032134003028628849.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13836263287313833149.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11637,0.247495,14028,2,3581,5,37319,6,0,478,27482,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EF(((s1>=1)&&(l36>=1))) * AG(EX(((s1<1)||(l1284<1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l36>=1))) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((s1<1)||(l1284<1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t39, t45, t46, t47, t53, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t72,...463
(forward)formula 0,0,1.30434,51756,1,0,255,186301,262,95,3370,130750,273
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 176 transition count 305
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 176 transition count 305
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 176 transition count 296
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 142 transition count 255
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 142 transition count 255
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 142 transition count 243
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 189 place count 124 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 124 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 124 transition count 202
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 226 place count 119 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 119 transition count 195
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 116 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 116 transition count 192
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 116 transition count 191
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 240 place count 114 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 114 transition count 183
Applied a total of 242 rules in 17 ms. Remains 114 /217 variables (removed 103) and now considering 183/428 (removed 245) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 114 cols
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 79 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 204 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 275 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 75 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/217 places, 183/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 368 ms. Remains : 114/217 places, 183/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11375899715056823459.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2167547270638667715.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11375899715056823459.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2167547270638667715.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,21569,0.602903,30724,2,4590,5,79525,6,0,639,44986,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AG(((s1<1)||(l1215<1))) + (A((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l948>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l1018>=1))) U ((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l1307>=1))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l1024>=1)...325
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1<1)||(l1215<1))))))),!(((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l1307>=1))) + (((s1>=1)...939
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t...742
(forward)formula 0,0,2.40406,82288,1,0,443,339152,421,186,4590,180789,517
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 175 transition count 292
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 175 transition count 292
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 175 transition count 283
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 140 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 140 transition count 243
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 140 transition count 228
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 123 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 123 transition count 200
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 123 transition count 190
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 230 place count 115 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 115 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 115 transition count 173
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 109 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 109 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 109 transition count 164
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 106 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 106 transition count 161
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 106 transition count 159
Applied a total of 263 rules in 15 ms. Remains 106 /217 variables (removed 111) and now considering 159/428 (removed 269) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 106 cols
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 71 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 199 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 259 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 67 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/217 places, 159/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 343 ms. Remains : 106/217 places, 159/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7941803464518378918.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8360926708851689943.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7941803464518378918.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8360926708851689943.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,15306,0.485345,24648,2,5067,5,66503,6,0,583,49414,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((!(E((((s1>=1)&&(l1019>=1))||((p47>=1)&&(l619>=1))) U AG(((s1>=1)&&(l415>=1))))) * AG(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l612>=1))))) * E(((AG(((s1>=1)&&...275
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((!(E((((s1>=1)&&(l1019>=1))||((p47>=1)&&(l619>=1))) U !(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l415>=1)))))...384
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 3/0/156
(forward)formula 0,0,2.1974,76828,1,0,20,261496,20,4,3019,160283,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 173 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 173 transition count 268
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 173 transition count 263
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 137 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 137 transition count 220
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 137 transition count 211
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 119 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 119 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 119 transition count 171
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 227 place count 112 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 112 transition count 160
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 239 place count 107 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 107 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 107 transition count 153
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 249 place count 104 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 104 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 104 transition count 143
Applied a total of 254 rules in 14 ms. Remains 104 /217 variables (removed 113) and now considering 143/428 (removed 285) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 143 rows 104 cols
[2023-03-08 01:40:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:40:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:40:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 54 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:40:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 190 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 255 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:40:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:40:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 65 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/217 places, 143/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 340 ms. Remains : 104/217 places, 143/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 143 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5433167058240404429.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:40:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7911148803596139574.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5433167058240404429.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7911148803596139574.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,15900,0.357629,18780,2,3742,5,49122,6,0,559,34739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((EG(AG(((p103<1)||(l0<1)))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l939>=1)))) + A(AX(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l451>=1)))) U EG((EG((((s1>=1)&&(l1226>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l95...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY((Init * !(!((E(!(EG((EG((((s1>=1)&&(l1226>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l957>=1)))) + !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l1...539
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t32, t41, t47, t48, t49, t51, t52, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t85, t86, t...546
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,3.23224,95716,1,0,462,453323,331,220,3867,304874,537
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 171 transition count 267
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 171 transition count 267
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 171 transition count 261
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 133 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 133 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 133 transition count 205
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 114 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 114 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 114 transition count 163
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 104 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 104 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 104 transition count 142
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 262 place count 97 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 97 transition count 135
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 97 transition count 132
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 276 place count 93 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 93 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 93 transition count 125
Applied a total of 283 rules in 10 ms. Remains 93 /217 variables (removed 124) and now considering 125/428 (removed 303) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 93 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/217 places, 125/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 276 ms. Remains : 93/217 places, 125/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9111636129884602791.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16048901474902686396.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9111636129884602791.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16048901474902686396.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11091,0.264135,15460,2,3875,5,40353,6,0,497,30190,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((A(A(((s1>=1)&&(l302>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l444>=1))) U EX(((s1>=1)&&(l421>=1)))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l606>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (!((E(!(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l421>=1)))) U (!(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l444>=1))) U (!(((s1>=1)...333
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t29, t30, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t58, t60, t61, t62, t...483
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.98001,105304,1,0,468,536825,290,222,3479,358053,546
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 175 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 175 transition count 287
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 175 transition count 279
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 142 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 142 transition count 242
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 142 transition count 228
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 126 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 126 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 126 transition count 193
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 120 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 120 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 120 transition count 181
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 117 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 117 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 117 transition count 177
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 237 place count 115 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 115 transition count 174
Applied a total of 239 rules in 15 ms. Remains 115 /217 variables (removed 102) and now considering 174/428 (removed 254) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 115 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 70 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 226 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 299 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 76 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 115/217 places, 174/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 391 ms. Remains : 115/217 places, 174/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 174 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12404486705071601054.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16839025236366379617.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12404486705071601054.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16839025236366379617.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,23063,0.680419,30772,2,6524,5,81296,6,0,634,63280,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(AF(AX((!(((s1>=1)&&(l449>=1))) * A(((s1>=1)&&(l1282>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l608>=1)))))) U ((!(((p34>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1238>=1))))...240
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * !((E(!(((!(((p34>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1238>=1))))||((s1>=1)&&(l1239>=1)))) U (!(!(EG(!(...544
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t19, t30, t31, t32, t35, t36, t37, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t...734
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,5.4966,170196,1,0,499,725947,399,222,4604,439272,570
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 169 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 169 transition count 256
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 169 transition count 251
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 130 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 130 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 130 transition count 194
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 211 place count 109 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 109 transition count 161
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 109 transition count 151
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 252 place count 99 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 99 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 99 transition count 132
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 91 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 91 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 91 transition count 121
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 288 place count 85 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 85 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 85 transition count 106
Applied a total of 297 rules in 33 ms. Remains 85 /217 variables (removed 132) and now considering 106/428 (removed 322) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 85 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 56 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/217 places, 106/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 293 ms. Remains : 85/217 places, 106/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17172803549589846587.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16061753354023672857.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17172803549589846587.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16061753354023672857.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9153,0.142926,10040,2,2599,5,23451,6,0,446,16297,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((s1<1)||(l1029<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((s1<1)||(l1029<1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 3/0/103
(forward)formula 0,1,0.761225,34572,1,0,20,120968,19,4,2314,77188,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 169 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 169 transition count 256
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 169 transition count 251
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 130 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 130 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 130 transition count 194
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 212 place count 108 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 108 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 108 transition count 149
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 254 place count 98 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 98 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 98 transition count 128
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 273 place count 91 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 91 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 91 transition count 118
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 288 place count 86 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 86 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 86 transition count 105
Applied a total of 296 rules in 21 ms. Remains 86 /217 variables (removed 131) and now considering 105/428 (removed 323) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 86 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 59 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/217 places, 105/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 281 ms. Remains : 86/217 places, 105/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10785676974862183075.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4652603717434176121.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10785676974862183075.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4652603717434176121.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9153,0.175329,11616,2,3153,5,28544,6,0,449,21824,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p50<1)||(l0<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p50<1)||(l0<1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t40, t46, t48, t49, t50, t66, t73, t74, t75, t76, t77, t78, t79, t80, t...378
(forward)formula 0,1,0.766444,31440,1,0,199,108102,231,81,3017,58319,223
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 173 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 173 transition count 275
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 173 transition count 266
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 136 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 136 transition count 222
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 136 transition count 211
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 117 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 117 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 117 transition count 174
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 240 place count 107 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 107 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 107 transition count 151
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 260 place count 101 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 101 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 101 transition count 143
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 272 place count 97 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 97 transition count 138
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 97 transition count 136
Applied a total of 278 rules in 8 ms. Remains 97 /217 variables (removed 120) and now considering 136/428 (removed 292) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 97 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 51 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 71 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/217 places, 136/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 295 ms. Remains : 97/217 places, 136/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6941931200901326178.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5445780224438255305.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6941931200901326178.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5445780224438255305.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,15094,0.306266,17144,2,4000,5,44806,6,0,524,36488,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG((!(A(!(((s1<1)||(l606<1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l545>=1)))) + AX(((s1<1)||(l1305<1))))) * AX((!(E(((p115>=1)&&(l531>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l488...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !((!(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l545>=1))) U (!(!(((s1<1)||(l606<1)))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l545>=1)))))...334
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t40, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t...549
(forward)formula 0,0,2.77433,96884,1,0,418,470130,315,184,3661,289321,506
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 171 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 171 transition count 271
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 171 transition count 265
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 133 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 133 transition count 220
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 133 transition count 209
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 112 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 112 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 112 transition count 162
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 102 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 102 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 102 transition count 142
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 95 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 95 transition count 135
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 95 transition count 132
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 284 place count 90 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 90 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 90 transition count 120
Applied a total of 290 rules in 12 ms. Remains 90 /217 variables (removed 127) and now considering 120/428 (removed 308) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 90 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 130 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 186 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 61 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/217 places, 120/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 260 ms. Remains : 90/217 places, 120/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16839596554140970311.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14909449834821149919.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16839596554140970311.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14909449834821149919.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11851,0.267025,14632,2,3504,5,37669,6,0,480,29463,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A(EF(EG(!(((s1<1)||(l606<1))))) U !(((s1<1)||(l606<1)))) U EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1291>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1291>=1))))))) * !(E(!(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1291>=1)))) U (!(!((E(!(!(((s1<1)||(l606<1...309
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t51, t52, t53, t60, t74, t78, t79, t...453
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.20221,74260,1,0,395,339295,277,188,3373,234499,465
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 174 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 174 transition count 280
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 174 transition count 271
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 140 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 140 transition count 231
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 140 transition count 221
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 121 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 121 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 121 transition count 181
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 232 place count 112 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 112 transition count 164
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 112 transition count 160
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 251 place count 106 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 106 transition count 154
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 106 transition count 153
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 262 place count 102 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 102 transition count 148
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 102 transition count 146
Applied a total of 268 rules in 8 ms. Remains 102 /217 variables (removed 115) and now considering 146/428 (removed 282) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 102 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 56 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 196 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 264 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:20] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 70 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/217 places, 146/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 343 ms. Remains : 102/217 places, 146/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 146 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12645008830674312762.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10653282463919337685.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12645008830674312762.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10653282463919337685.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16675,0.482469,23552,2,5045,5,60059,6,0,554,45992,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((!(A(!(((s1<1)||(l1284<1))) U (((s1>=1)&&(l1217>=1))||((p35>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) * EG((((s1<1)||(l610<1))&&((s1<1)||(l1240<1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(!(!((E(!((((s1>=1)&&(l1217>=1))||((p35>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) U (!(!(((s1<1)||(l1284<1)))) * !((((s1>=1...311
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t20, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t...573
(forward)formula 0,1,4.13136,142264,1,0,547,618124,327,266,3913,466100,593
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 174 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 174 transition count 280
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 174 transition count 275
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 138 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 138 transition count 232
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 138 transition count 218
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 198 place count 117 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 117 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 117 transition count 175
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 107 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 107 transition count 157
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 107 transition count 153
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 100 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 100 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 100 transition count 143
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 273 place count 96 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 96 transition count 138
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 96 transition count 137
Applied a total of 278 rules in 29 ms. Remains 96 /217 variables (removed 121) and now considering 137/428 (removed 291) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 96 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 56 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 72 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/217 places, 137/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 358 ms. Remains : 96/217 places, 137/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15365471237897054749.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10825840874863790067.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15365471237897054749.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10825840874863790067.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,13821,0.38041,20576,2,4244,5,56615,6,0,521,41858,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(!(A(((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l7>=1))) * AG(((s1>=1)&&(l612>=1)))) + A(((s1>=1)&&(l1255>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l414>=1)))) U AG(A(((s1>=1)&&(l304>=1...214
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1220>=1))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l304>=1))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l122...740
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 3/0/134
(forward)formula 0,0,1.6644,60156,1,0,20,216045,20,4,2710,123957,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 171 transition count 270
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 171 transition count 270
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 171 transition count 259
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 135 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 135 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 135 transition count 205
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 115 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 115 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 115 transition count 167
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 106 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 106 transition count 150
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 106 transition count 144
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 263 place count 102 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 102 transition count 140
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 102 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 99 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 99 transition count 130
Applied a total of 274 rules in 17 ms. Remains 99 /217 variables (removed 118) and now considering 130/428 (removed 298) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 99 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 66 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/217 places, 130/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 303 ms. Remains : 99/217 places, 130/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 130 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4757371197457320658.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14972609039045867148.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4757371197457320658.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14972609039045867148.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17443,0.432931,20828,2,4083,5,56434,6,0,526,41586,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1224>=1))) + EG(A(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1220>=1))) U ((p123>=1)&&(l531>=1))))) + EG(((s1>=1)&&(l941>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((s1>=1)&&(l1224>=1)))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(((p123>=1)&&(l531>=1))) U (!(!(((s1>=...294
(forward)formula 0,1,0.434446,21092,1,0,7,56434,8,1,530,41586,1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 180 transition count 312
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 180 transition count 312
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 180 transition count 303
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 150 transition count 270
Iterating global reduction 1 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 150 transition count 270
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 150 transition count 257
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 138 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 138 transition count 238
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 138 transition count 226
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 134 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 134 transition count 217
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 131 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 131 transition count 214
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 131 transition count 212
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 210 place count 129 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 129 transition count 210
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 129 transition count 208
Applied a total of 214 rules in 13 ms. Remains 129 /217 variables (removed 88) and now considering 208/428 (removed 220) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 129 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 94 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 249 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 320 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 82 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/217 places, 208/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 416 ms. Remains : 129/217 places, 208/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 208 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability248672796233154740.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13020169295235704074.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability248672796233154740.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13020169295235704074.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25011,1.21051,42224,2,7673,5,113494,6,0,724,76986,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((AX((((p74<1)||(l447<1))&&(((s1>=1)&&(l456>=1))||((s2>=1)&&(l1259>=1))))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l1217>=1))) + E(((!((p51>=1)&&(l619>=1)))||((...419
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(((!(EX(!((((p74<1)||(l447<1))&&(((s1>=1)&&(l456>=1))||((s2>=1)&&(l1259>=1))))))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l12...581
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t28, t30, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t...842
(forward)formula 0,0,8.26807,232440,1,0,596,969093,457,291,5130,673893,647
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 173 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 173 transition count 266
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 173 transition count 259
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 137 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 137 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 137 transition count 206
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 118 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 118 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 118 transition count 171
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 232 place count 109 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 109 transition count 154
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 109 transition count 150
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 104 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 104 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 104 transition count 143
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 260 place count 101 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 101 transition count 139
Applied a total of 263 rules in 14 ms. Remains 101 /217 variables (removed 116) and now considering 139/428 (removed 289) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 101 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:35] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 48 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 210 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 63 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/217 places, 139/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 297 ms. Remains : 101/217 places, 139/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability191583344620815628.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13128341630178709070.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability191583344620815628.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13128341630178709070.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17306,0.571705,23772,2,5108,5,61876,6,0,543,54914,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(((EF(((p46>=1)&&(l0>=1))) * (s1>=1)) * ((l1216>=1)&&(!((s1>=1)&&(l309>=1))))) U ((EF(((s1>=1)&&(l35>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l954>=1))) + ...205
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l35>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l954>=1))) + (((p88>=1)&&(l447>=1))&&(...541
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t11, t12, t19, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t...541
(forward)formula 0,0,3.15884,94020,1,0,303,368237,307,119,3788,226441,322
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 217/217 places, 428/428 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 172 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 172 transition count 276
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 172 transition count 268
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 135 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 135 transition count 224
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 135 transition count 208
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 115 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 115 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 115 transition count 167
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 248 place count 104 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 104 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 104 transition count 143
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 270 place count 97 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 97 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 97 transition count 133
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 284 place count 93 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 93 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 93 transition count 126
Applied a total of 290 rules in 13 ms. Remains 93 /217 variables (removed 124) and now considering 126/428 (removed 302) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 93 cols
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 59 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/217 places, 126/428 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 280 ms. Remains : 93/217 places, 126/428 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9388010614942876989.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12180116030462894231.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9388010614942876989.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12180116030462894231.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,12344,0.277795,14936,2,3563,5,38006,6,0,498,31018,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A((AF(!(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l1216>=1))))) * !(((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l608>=1))) * EF(((s1>=1)&&(l612>=1)))) * (((s1>=1)&&(l519>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l60...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU(EY(Init),!(((s1>=1)&&(l970>=1)))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l970>=1)))),!(!(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1216>=1)))))))...411
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/0/124
(forward)formula 0,0,1.45116,48732,1,0,21,173516,20,4,2597,114116,17
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2023-03-08 01:41:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-08 01:41:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Total runtime 75271 ms.

BK_STOP 1678239702210

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
++ sed s/.jar//
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r101-tall-167814475100234"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d1m04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;