fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r074-smll-167814400000210
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of Marcie+red for ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
5979.960 31088.00 36594.00 579.10 FFFTFFTTTTFTTFFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r074-smll-167814400000210.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool marciexred
Input is ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r074-smll-167814400000210
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 396K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Feb 26 13:27 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K Feb 26 13:27 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K Feb 26 13:26 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K Feb 26 13:26 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Feb 25 15:43 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Feb 25 15:43 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Feb 25 15:43 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 15:43 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10K Feb 26 13:27 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 107K Feb 26 13:27 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K Feb 26 13:27 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K Feb 26 13:27 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Feb 25 15:43 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 15:43 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678333702742

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=marciexred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0
Applying reductions before tool marcie
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-09 03:48:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2023-03-09 03:48:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-09 03:48:26] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 167 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:26] [INFO ] Transformed 25 places.
[2023-03-09 03:48:26] [INFO ] Transformed 18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:26] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 25 places and 18 transitions and 54 arcs in 318 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 23 ms.
Support contains 25 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 24 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 25 cols
[2023-03-09 03:48:26] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 8 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 251 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 03:48:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 03:48:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 395 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-09 03:48:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 03:48:26] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 99 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 523 ms. Remains : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Support contains 25 out of 25 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10003 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 200 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 34) seen :33
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 55 ms. (steps per millisecond=181 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] After 43ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0
Fused 1 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 24 transition count 18
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 24 /25 variables (removed 1) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 24/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 23 transition count 17
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 22 transition count 15
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 20 transition count 15
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 20 transition count 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 19 transition count 14
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 18 transition count 13
Applied a total of 12 rules in 16 ms. Remains 18 /25 variables (removed 7) and now considering 13/18 (removed 5) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16 ms. Remains : 18/25 places, 13/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 13 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 24 transition count 18
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 24 /25 variables (removed 1) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 24/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 21 transition count 15
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 18 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 17 transition count 14
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 17 transition count 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 13
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 13 transition count 10
Applied a total of 20 rules in 6 ms. Remains 13 /25 variables (removed 12) and now considering 10/18 (removed 8) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 13/25 places, 10/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /25 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 22/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /25 variables (removed 4) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 22 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 17 transition count 13
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 17 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 14 transition count 10
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 12 transition count 8
Applied a total of 23 rules in 5 ms. Remains 12 /25 variables (removed 13) and now considering 8/18 (removed 10) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 12/25 places, 8/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 8 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /25 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 22/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 18
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 23 /25 variables (removed 2) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 23/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 21 transition count 12
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 15 transition count 12
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 15 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 14 transition count 11
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 10 transition count 7
Applied a total of 26 rules in 4 ms. Remains 10 /25 variables (removed 15) and now considering 7/18 (removed 11) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 10/25 places, 7/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 7 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 21 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 17 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 13
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 13 transition count 10
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 10 transition count 7
Applied a total of 26 rules in 5 ms. Remains 10 /25 variables (removed 15) and now considering 7/18 (removed 11) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 10/25 places, 7/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 7 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 0 ms. Remains : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /25 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 22/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 21 transition count 12
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 15 transition count 12
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 15 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 13 transition count 10
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 9 transition count 6
Applied a total of 28 rules in 4 ms. Remains 9 /25 variables (removed 16) and now considering 6/18 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 9/25 places, 6/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /25 variables (removed 4) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /25 variables (removed 4) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 21/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
[2023-03-09 03:48:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 03:48:28] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 16 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 4 ms.
[2023-03-09 03:48:28] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 25 places, 18 transitions and 54 arcs took 1 ms.
Total runtime 2205 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
timeout --kill-after=10s --signal=SIGINT 1m for testing only

Marcie built on Linux at 2019-11-18.
A model checker for Generalized Stochastic Petri nets

authors: Alex Tovchigrechko (IDD package and CTL model checking)

Martin Schwarick (Symbolic numerical analysis and CSL model checking)

Christian Rohr (Simulative and approximative numerical model checking)

marcie@informatik.tu-cottbus.de

called as: /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../marcie/bin/marcie --net-file=model.pnml --mcc-file=CTLFireability.xml --memory=6 --mcc-mode

parse successfull
net created successfully

Net: Petri
(NrP: 25 NrTr: 18 NrArc: 54)

parse formulas
formulas created successfully
place and transition orderings generation:0m 0.000sec

net check time: 0m 0.000sec

init dd package: 0m 3.370sec


RS generation: 0m 1.041sec


-> reachability set: #nodes 17697 (1.8e+04) #states 7,081,638 (6)



starting MCC model checker
--------------------------

checking: AG [EF [p22<=0]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [E [true U p22<=0]]]]

abstracting: (p22<=0)
states: 2,570,690 (6)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.310sec

checking: AF [1<=p10]
normalized: ~ [EG [~ [1<=p10]]]

abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
..................................................................................................................
EG iterations: 114
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 2.603sec

checking: AX [[AG [EX [p20<=0]] | EX [0<=0]]]
normalized: ~ [EX [~ [[EX [0<=0] | ~ [E [true U ~ [EX [p20<=0]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (p20<=0)
states: 5,182,067 (6)
.abstracting: (0<=0)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
..-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.173sec

checking: AG [EF [EG [[p4<=0 | p21<=0]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [E [true U EG [[p4<=0 | p21<=0]]]]]]

abstracting: (p21<=0)
states: 59,885 (4)
abstracting: (p4<=0)
states: 1,437,851 (6)
..................................................................................................................................
EG iterations: 130
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 2.638sec

checking: EG [[p3<=0 | p14<=0]]
normalized: EG [[p3<=0 | p14<=0]]

abstracting: (p14<=0)
states: 0
abstracting: (p3<=0)
states: 5,175,317 (6)
.........................................................................................................................................................
EG iterations: 153
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 1.479sec

checking: AX [AX [AG [[AF [1<=p6] | EG [1<=p12]]]]]
normalized: ~ [EX [EX [E [true U ~ [[EG [1<=p12] | ~ [EG [~ [1<=p6]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
................................
EG iterations: 32
..-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.090sec

checking: AG [AX [EF [[1<=p10 | [1<=p2 & 1<=p14]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U EX [~ [E [true U [1<=p10 | [1<=p2 & 1<=p14]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.135sec

checking: EX [EX [[EG [[p12<=0 & [p2<=0 | p14<=0]]] & [AF [[p1<=0 | p19<=0]] | 1<=p24]]]]
normalized: EX [EX [[[1<=p24 | ~ [EG [~ [[p1<=0 | p19<=0]]]]] & EG [[p12<=0 & [p2<=0 | p14<=0]]]]]]

abstracting: (p14<=0)
states: 0
abstracting: (p2<=0)
states: 5,543,750 (6)
abstracting: (p12<=0)
states: 5,543,750 (6)
..............................................................
EG iterations: 62
abstracting: (p19<=0)
states: 2,028,905 (6)
abstracting: (p1<=0)
states: 5,182,067 (6)
................................
EG iterations: 32
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
..-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 1.292sec

checking: AG [A [EF [[[1<=p7 & 1<=p23] | [~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p19]] & 1<=p9]]] U ~ [[AF [1<=p12] & 1<=p12]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[~ [EG [[1<=p12 & ~ [EG [~ [1<=p12]]]]]] & ~ [E [[1<=p12 & ~ [EG [~ [1<=p12]]]] U [~ [E [true U [[1<=p9 & ~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]] | [1<=p7 & 1<=p23]]]] & [1<=p12 & ~ [EG [~ [1<=p12]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
............................................................................................................................
EG iterations: 124
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 7,022,428 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 5,052,733 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
............................................................................................................................
EG iterations: 124
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
............................................................................................................................
EG iterations: 124
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
................................
EG iterations: 32
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.624sec

checking: EG [[EG [AF [p10<=0]] & [1<=p24 & [E [1<=p24 U [1<=p0 & 1<=p13]] | [1<=p16 & 1<=p6]]]]]
normalized: EG [[[1<=p24 & [[1<=p16 & 1<=p6] | E [1<=p24 U [1<=p0 & 1<=p13]]]] & EG [~ [EG [~ [p10<=0]]]]]]

abstracting: (p10<=0)
states: 5,543,750 (6)
................................
EG iterations: 32
..................................................................................................
EG iterations: 98
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,586,990 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.837sec

checking: EF [[EG [[AX [1<=p9] | EX [[1<=p2 & 1<=p14]]]] & [~ [A [~ [[p4<=0 | p21<=0]] U ~ [[p2<=0 | p14<=0]]]] | EX [[p4<=0 | p21<=0]]]]]
normalized: E [true U [[EX [[p4<=0 | p21<=0]] | ~ [[~ [EG [[p2<=0 | p14<=0]]] & ~ [E [[p2<=0 | p14<=0] U [[p4<=0 | p21<=0] & [p2<=0 | p14<=0]]]]]]] & EG [[EX [[1<=p2 & 1<=p14]] | ~ [EX [~ [1<=p9]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
.abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
.................................
EG iterations: 32
abstracting: (p14<=0)
states: 0
abstracting: (p2<=0)
states: 5,543,750 (6)
abstracting: (p21<=0)
states: 59,885 (4)
abstracting: (p4<=0)
states: 1,437,851 (6)
abstracting: (p14<=0)
states: 0
abstracting: (p2<=0)
states: 5,543,750 (6)
abstracting: (p14<=0)
states: 0
abstracting: (p2<=0)
states: 5,543,750 (6)
....................................................................................................................
EG iterations: 116
abstracting: (p21<=0)
states: 59,885 (4)
abstracting: (p4<=0)
states: 1,437,851 (6)
.-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.974sec

checking: [EX [AF [[AX [[1<=p8 & 1<=p15]] | [E [[1<=p3 & 1<=p14] U [1<=p1 & 1<=p19]] | EF [[p2<=0 | p14<=0]]]]]] & EF [[~ [E [1<=p6 U [1<=p7 & 1<=p23]]] & AG [p22<=0]]]]
normalized: [E [true U [~ [E [true U ~ [p22<=0]]] & ~ [E [1<=p6 U [1<=p7 & 1<=p23]]]]] & EX [~ [EG [~ [[[E [true U [p2<=0 | p14<=0]] | E [[1<=p3 & 1<=p14] U [1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]] | ~ [EX [~ [[1<=p8 & 1<=p15]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,356,515 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
.abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 5,052,733 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (p14<=0)
states: 0
abstracting: (p2<=0)
states: 5,543,750 (6)
.
EG iterations: 1
.abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 7,022,428 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (p22<=0)
states: 2,570,690 (6)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.498sec

checking: AG [A [[EG [[A [1<=p12 U [1<=p14 & 1<=p3]] | EG [[1<=p11 & 1<=p17]]]] & ~ [AX [EF [1<=p6]]]] U EX [[[1<=p24 | [1<=p18 & EF [[1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]]] | [[1<=p7 & 1<=p23] | [1<=p8 & 1<=p15]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[~ [EG [~ [EX [[[[1<=p8 & 1<=p15] | [1<=p7 & 1<=p23]] | [1<=p24 | [1<=p18 & E [true U [1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [EX [[[[1<=p8 & 1<=p15] | [1<=p7 & 1<=p23]] | [1<=p24 | [1<=p18 & E [true U [1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]]]]]] U [~ [[EX [~ [E [true U 1<=p6]]] & EG [[EG [[1<=p11 & 1<=p17]] | [~ [EG [~ [[1<=p14 & 1<=p3]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[1<=p14 & 1<=p3]] U [~ [1<=p12] & ~ [[1<=p14 & 1<=p3]]]]]]]]]] & ~ [EX [[[[1<=p8 & 1<=p15] | [1<=p7 & 1<=p23]] | [1<=p24 | [1<=p18 & E [true U [1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 5,052,733 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p18)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 7,022,428 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,356,515 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
.abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
.........................................................................................................................................................
EG iterations: 153
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 5,062,183 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
................................
EG iterations: 32
................................
EG iterations: 32
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
.abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 5,052,733 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p18)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 7,022,428 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,356,515 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
.abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 5,052,733 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p18)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 7,022,428 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,356,515 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
.......................
EG iterations: 22
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.636sec

checking: [EF [[A [EG [[1<=p6 & [1<=p4 & 1<=p21]]] U ~ [EF [1<=p10]]] & AF [EX [p22<=0]]]] & EG [[A [E [[[1<=p3 & 1<=p14] | 1<=p24] U p18<=0] U ~ [[~ [[1<=p4 & 1<=p21]] | [1<=p4 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]]]]] | p20<=0]]]
normalized: [EG [[p20<=0 | [~ [EG [[[1<=p4 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]] | ~ [[1<=p4 & 1<=p21]]]]] & ~ [E [[[1<=p4 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]] | ~ [[1<=p4 & 1<=p21]]] U [~ [E [[1<=p24 | [1<=p3 & 1<=p14]] U p18<=0]] & [[1<=p4 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]] | ~ [[1<=p4 & 1<=p21]]]]]]]]] & E [true U [~ [EG [~ [EX [p22<=0]]]] & [~ [EG [E [true U 1<=p10]]] & ~ [E [E [true U 1<=p10] U [~ [EG [[1<=p6 & [1<=p4 & 1<=p21]]]] & E [true U 1<=p10]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 7,021,753 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
..............................
EG iterations: 30
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (p22<=0)
states: 2,570,690 (6)
...............................
EG iterations: 30
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 7,021,753 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 7,021,753 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (p18<=0)
states: 5,543,750 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 7,021,753 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 7,021,753 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 7,021,753 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 7,021,753 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
..................................
EG iterations: 34
abstracting: (p20<=0)
states: 5,182,067 (6)
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 1.771sec

checking: E [E [EF [~ [[~ [[1<=p13 & 1<=p0]] & [[1<=p11 & 1<=p17] | [1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]]]] U AG [~ [AX [[1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]]]] U ~ [A [[[A [1<=p12 U [1<=p0 & 1<=p13]] & ~ [E [[1<=p3 & 1<=p14] U [1<=p3 & 1<=p14]]]] & [1<=p7 & 1<=p23]] U EF [[1<=p5 & 1<=p15]]]]]
normalized: E [E [E [true U ~ [[[[1<=p1 & 1<=p19] | [1<=p11 & 1<=p17]] & ~ [[1<=p13 & 1<=p0]]]]] U ~ [E [true U ~ [EX [~ [[1<=p1 & 1<=p19]]]]]]] U ~ [[~ [EG [~ [E [true U [1<=p5 & 1<=p15]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [E [true U [1<=p5 & 1<=p15]]] U [~ [[[1<=p7 & 1<=p23] & [~ [E [[1<=p3 & 1<=p14] U [1<=p3 & 1<=p14]]] & [~ [EG [~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p13]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p13]] U [~ [1<=p12] & ~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p13]]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [true U [1<=p5 & 1<=p15]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,356,515 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,586,990 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,586,990 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,586,990 (6)
........................................................................................................................
EG iterations: 120
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 7,022,428 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,356,515 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,356,515 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 5,052,733 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
.abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,586,990 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 5,062,183 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 5,052,733 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.491sec

checking: E [[~ [AX [AF [~ [[p2<=0 | p14<=0]]]]] | [[AX [[~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p14]] | [1<=p4 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p6]]]] | [E [EX [1<=p10] U AG [1<=p9]] & [E [[1<=p1 & 1<=p19] U 1<=p22] | ~ [[1<=p4 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p18]]]]]] & [[1<=p4 & [1<=p21 & ~ [[1<=p20 & [1<=p8 & 1<=p15]]]]] | [1<=p24 & ~ [[[1<=p0 & 1<=p13] | EX [[1<=p8 & 1<=p15]]]]]]]] U [1<=p16 & [[~ [[[EF [1<=p22] | [1<=p7 & 1<=p23]] & [[1<=p11 & [1<=p17 & 1<=p10]] | [[1<=p2 & 1<=p14] | [1<=p2 & 1<=p14]]]]] & [1<=p3 & 1<=p14]] | [AX [AF [1<=p18]] & [~ [E [[1<=p0 & 1<=p13] U [1<=p5 & 1<=p15]]] & EX [AG [[1<=p0 & 1<=p13]]]]]]]]
normalized: E [[[[[1<=p24 & ~ [[EX [[1<=p8 & 1<=p15]] | [1<=p0 & 1<=p13]]]] | [1<=p4 & [1<=p21 & ~ [[1<=p20 & [1<=p8 & 1<=p15]]]]]] & [[[~ [[1<=p4 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p18]]] | E [[1<=p1 & 1<=p19] U 1<=p22]] & E [EX [1<=p10] U ~ [E [true U ~ [1<=p9]]]]] | ~ [EX [~ [[[1<=p4 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p6]] | ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p14]]]]]]]] | EX [EG [[p2<=0 | p14<=0]]]] U [1<=p16 & [[[EX [~ [E [true U ~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p13]]]]] & ~ [E [[1<=p0 & 1<=p13] U [1<=p5 & 1<=p15]]]] & ~ [EX [EG [~ [1<=p18]]]]] | [[1<=p3 & 1<=p14] & ~ [[[[[1<=p2 & 1<=p14] | [1<=p2 & 1<=p14]] | [1<=p11 & [1<=p17 & 1<=p10]]] & [[1<=p7 & 1<=p23] | E [true U 1<=p22]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 7,022,428 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 5,062,183 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p18)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
....................................................................................................................................
EG iterations: 132
.abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,356,515 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,586,990 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,586,990 (6)
.abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (p14<=0)
states: 0
abstracting: (p2<=0)
states: 5,543,750 (6)
....................................................................................................................
EG iterations: 116
.abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 7,081,638 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 7,021,753 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
.abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
.abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 4,510,948 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 5,052,733 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p18)
states: 1,537,888 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 7,021,753 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,356,515 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p20)
states: 1,899,571 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 7,021,753 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 1,906,321 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,586,990 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,356,515 (6)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
.abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 5,643,787 (6)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 2.126sec

totally nodes used: 5642917 (5.6e+06)
number of garbage collections: 0
fire ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 17636368 14879952 32516320
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 16758720 50350144 16 1024MB
basic ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 3351695 3086618 6438313
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 4576252 12200964 12 192MB
unary ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 8 128MB
abstract ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 12 192MB
state nr cache: hits/miss/sum: 182604 139736 322340
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 138655 8249953 32 256MB
max state cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 8388608 32 256MB
uniqueHash elements/entry size/size: 67108864 4 256MB
0 62152167
1 4525584
2 358558
3 42898
4 9298
5 4210
6 2299
7 2366
8 1726
9 1739
>= 10 8019

Total processing time: 0m24.427sec


BK_STOP 1678333733830

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
check for maximal unmarked siphon
ok
check for constant places
ok
check if there are places and transitions
ok
check if there are transitions without pre-places
ok
check if at least one transition is enabled in m0
ok
check if there are transitions that can never fire
ok


initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:2022 (112), effective:438 (24)

initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:34 (1), effective:8 (0)

iterations count:627 (34), effective:141 (7)

iterations count:190 (10), effective:40 (2)

iterations count:163 (9), effective:29 (1)

iterations count:94 (5), effective:18 (1)

iterations count:621 (34), effective:126 (7)

iterations count:102 (5), effective:21 (1)

iterations count:137 (7), effective:26 (1)

iterations count:129 (7), effective:23 (1)

iterations count:50 (2), effective:16 (0)

iterations count:262 (14), effective:74 (4)

iterations count:103 (5), effective:18 (1)

iterations count:54 (3), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:116 (6), effective:20 (1)

iterations count:115 (6), effective:20 (1)

iterations count:653 (36), effective:143 (7)

iterations count:103 (5), effective:18 (1)

iterations count:34 (1), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:101 (5), effective:19 (1)

iterations count:103 (5), effective:18 (1)

iterations count:18 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:103 (5), effective:18 (1)

iterations count:359 (19), effective:92 (5)

iterations count:103 (5), effective:19 (1)

iterations count:103 (5), effective:19 (1)

iterations count:48 (2), effective:15 (0)

iterations count:103 (5), effective:19 (1)

iterations count:629 (34), effective:127 (7)

iterations count:38 (2), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:242 (13), effective:39 (2)

iterations count:104 (5), effective:19 (1)

iterations count:34 (1), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:18 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:104 (5), effective:19 (1)

iterations count:18 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:104 (5), effective:19 (1)

iterations count:769 (42), effective:173 (9)

iterations count:50 (2), effective:8 (0)

iterations count:18 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:115 (6), effective:20 (1)

iterations count:104 (5), effective:19 (1)

iterations count:30 (1), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:58 (3), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:115 (6), effective:20 (1)

iterations count:229 (12), effective:42 (2)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="marciexred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool marciexred"
echo " Input is ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r074-smll-167814400000210"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0.tgz
mv ClientsAndServers-PT-N0002P0 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;