fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r039-tajo-167813692700532
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of LoLa+red for BusinessProcesses-PT-11

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
514.855 33108.00 62334.00 191.60 TTFFFFFTFTFFFFFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r039-tajo-167813692700532.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool lolaxred
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-11, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r039-tajo-167813692700532
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K Feb 25 16:49 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K Feb 25 16:49 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K Feb 25 16:48 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K Feb 25 16:48 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Feb 25 15:39 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Feb 25 15:39 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Feb 25 15:39 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Feb 25 15:39 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K Feb 25 16:49 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Feb 25 16:49 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K Feb 25 16:49 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K Feb 25 16:49 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Feb 25 15:39 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 15:39 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 141K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678502805039

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=lolaxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-11
Applying reductions before tool lola
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-11 02:46:47] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2023-03-11 02:46:47] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-11 02:46:47] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 79 ms
[2023-03-11 02:46:47] [INFO ] Transformed 567 places.
[2023-03-11 02:46:47] [INFO ] Transformed 508 transitions.
[2023-03-11 02:46:47] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2023-03-11 02:46:47] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 567 places and 508 transitions and 1512 arcs in 205 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 16 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 5 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 7 transitions.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 36 out of 560 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 560/560 places, 501/501 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 556 transition count 501
Discarding 72 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 72 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 484 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 1 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 484 transition count 429
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 449 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 449 transition count 394
Applied a total of 218 rules in 153 ms. Remains 449 /560 variables (removed 111) and now considering 394/501 (removed 107) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 394 rows 449 cols
[2023-03-11 02:46:48] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 29 ms
[2023-03-11 02:46:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 486 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 02:46:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:46:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 4269 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 4818 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-11 02:46:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:46:53] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 340 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 449/560 places, 394/501 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5325 ms. Remains : 449/560 places, 394/501 transitions.
Support contains 36 out of 449 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-11 02:46:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 101 ms
[2023-03-11 02:46:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2023-03-11 02:46:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 394 transitions.
Support contains 35 out of 449 places (down from 36) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 74 resets, run finished after 517 ms. (steps per millisecond=19 ) properties (out of 27) seen :12
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 40 ms. (steps per millisecond=25 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 15 properties.
[2023-03-11 02:46:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:46:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 49 positive place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2023-03-11 02:46:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 49 positive and 42 generalized place invariants in 36 ms returned sat
[2023-03-11 02:46:55] [INFO ] After 617ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :2 sat :2 real:11
[2023-03-11 02:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:56] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 423 ms
[2023-03-11 02:46:56] [INFO ] After 1085ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :2 sat :0 real:13
[2023-03-11 02:46:56] [INFO ] After 1716ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :2 sat :0 real:13
[2023-03-11 02:46:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 49 positive place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2023-03-11 02:46:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 49 positive and 42 generalized place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2023-03-11 02:46:56] [INFO ] After 338ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :13
[2023-03-11 02:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 116 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 107 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:57] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 10/9 trap constraints in 860 ms
[2023-03-11 02:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:58] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 261 ms
[2023-03-11 02:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:58] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 107 ms
[2023-03-11 02:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 106 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 129 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 106 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 129 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 102 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:59] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 687 ms
[2023-03-11 02:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-11 02:46:59] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 139 ms
[2023-03-11 02:46:59] [INFO ] After 2739ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :13
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 282 ms.
[2023-03-11 02:46:59] [INFO ] After 3335ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :13
Fused 15 Parikh solutions to 13 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 232 ms.
Support contains 18 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1009 edges and 449 vertex of which 448 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 41 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 41 transitions
Performed 41 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 41
Iterating post reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 448 transition count 352
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 407 transition count 348
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 403 transition count 348
Performed 92 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 92 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 403 transition count 256
Deduced a syphon composed of 92 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 108 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 295 transition count 256
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 297 place count 289 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 289 transition count 250
Performed 107 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 107 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 110 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 217 rules applied. Total rules applied 520 place count 179 transition count 143
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 521 place count 179 transition count 142
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 523 place count 178 transition count 146
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 528 place count 178 transition count 146
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 529 place count 177 transition count 145
Applied a total of 529 rules in 101 ms. Remains 177 /449 variables (removed 272) and now considering 145/394 (removed 249) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 101 ms. Remains : 177/449 places, 145/394 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1088 resets, run finished after 404 ms. (steps per millisecond=24 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 295 resets, run finished after 96 ms. (steps per millisecond=104 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 312 resets, run finished after 93 ms. (steps per millisecond=107 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 252 resets, run finished after 62 ms. (steps per millisecond=161 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 321 resets, run finished after 71 ms. (steps per millisecond=140 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 308 resets, run finished after 68 ms. (steps per millisecond=147 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 322 resets, run finished after 58 ms. (steps per millisecond=172 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 309 resets, run finished after 65 ms. (steps per millisecond=153 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 317 resets, run finished after 72 ms. (steps per millisecond=138 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 343 resets, run finished after 83 ms. (steps per millisecond=120 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 316 resets, run finished after 79 ms. (steps per millisecond=126 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 252 resets, run finished after 76 ms. (steps per millisecond=131 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 311 resets, run finished after 86 ms. (steps per millisecond=116 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 287 resets, run finished after 91 ms. (steps per millisecond=109 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 59451 steps, run visited all 13 properties in 188 ms. (steps per millisecond=316 )
Probabilistic random walk after 59451 steps, saw 15138 distinct states, run finished after 188 ms. (steps per millisecond=316 ) properties seen :13
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
Computed a total of 434 stabilizing places and 379 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1009 edges and 449 vertex of which 448 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.16 ms
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)||(p1 U (p2||G(p1))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 205 edges and 449 vertex of which 6 / 449 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1003 edges and 444 vertex of which 443 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 442 transition count 338
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 394 transition count 338
Performed 94 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 94 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 394 transition count 244
Deduced a syphon composed of 94 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 110 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 204 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 284 transition count 244
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 310 place count 276 transition count 236
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 276 transition count 236
Performed 109 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 109
Deduced a syphon composed of 109 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 221 rules applied. Total rules applied 539 place count 164 transition count 127
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 541 place count 163 transition count 131
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 542 place count 162 transition count 130
Applied a total of 542 rules in 54 ms. Remains 162 /449 variables (removed 287) and now considering 130/394 (removed 264) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 162 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:02] [INFO ] Computed 72 place invariants in 11 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned [129, 135]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 141 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 160/449 places, 130/394 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 160 /160 variables (removed 0) and now considering 130/130 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 203 ms. Remains : 160/449 places, 130/394 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 162 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(NEQ s43 1), p2:(AND (NEQ s56 1) (NEQ s1 1)), p1:(NEQ s1 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 18148 reset in 359 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 18181 reset in 251 ms.
Computed a total of 160 stabilizing places and 129 stable transitions
Computed a total of 160 stabilizing places and 129 stable transitions
Detected a total of 160/160 stabilizing places and 129/130 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 3/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p2 p1), (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 223 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 85 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2011 resets, run finished after 154 ms. (steps per millisecond=64 ) properties (out of 2) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 554 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=769 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 160 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:03] [INFO ] Computed 70 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 52 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2023-03-11 02:47:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 52 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2023-03-11 02:47:03] [INFO ] After 104ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0
Fused 1 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p2 p1), (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1)))), (G (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge :(G (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 216 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-01 finished in 1890 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((G(p0)||X((p1||F(G(p1))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 440 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 440 transition count 385
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 438 transition count 383
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 438 transition count 383
Applied a total of 22 rules in 36 ms. Remains 438 /449 variables (removed 11) and now considering 383/394 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 383 rows 438 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:03] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 6 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 02:47:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 502 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 738 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-11 02:47:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:04] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 268 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 438/449 places, 383/394 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1043 ms. Remains : 438/449 places, 383/394 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 170 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-02 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}]], initial=2, aps=[p0:(EQ s382 1), p1:(AND (EQ s201 1) (EQ s264 1) (EQ s399 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 137 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-02 finished in 1243 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(p0)&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 440 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 440 transition count 385
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 438 transition count 383
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 438 transition count 383
Applied a total of 22 rules in 51 ms. Remains 438 /449 variables (removed 11) and now considering 383/394 (removed 11) transitions.
[2023-03-11 02:47:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 196 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 02:47:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 519 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 717 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-11 02:47:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 238 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 438/449 places, 383/394 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1007 ms. Remains : 438/449 places, 383/394 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 157 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(EQ s99 1), p1:(EQ s135 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-04 finished in 1195 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((((p0 U p1)||X(G(p2))) U !p3)))'
Support contains 3 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 442 transition count 387
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 442 transition count 387
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 440 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 440 transition count 385
Applied a total of 18 rules in 31 ms. Remains 440 /449 variables (removed 9) and now considering 385/394 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 440 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:06] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 11 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 212 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 02:47:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 543 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 758 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-11 02:47:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 244 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 440/449 places, 385/394 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1034 ms. Remains : 440/449 places, 385/394 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 218 ms :[p3, p3, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-07 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p3, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=p2, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0 p2), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=0, aps=[p3:(AND (EQ s96 1) (EQ s304 1)), p1:(EQ s193 1), p0:(EQ s96 1), p2:(EQ s304 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 453 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 317 ms.
Computed a total of 425 stabilizing places and 370 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 996 edges and 440 vertex of which 439 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Computed a total of 425 stabilizing places and 370 stable transitions
Detected a total of 425/440 stabilizing places and 370/385 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 4/4 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p3)), (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (F (OR (G p3) (G (NOT p3)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge :(X (NOT p3))
Knowledge based reduction with 16 factoid took 241 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 13 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-07 finished in 2296 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0 U (p1||G(p0)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 442 transition count 387
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 442 transition count 387
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 441 transition count 386
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 441 transition count 386
Applied a total of 16 rules in 32 ms. Remains 441 /449 variables (removed 8) and now considering 386/394 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 441 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:08] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 8 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 189 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 02:47:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 535 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 731 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-11 02:47:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:09] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 211 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 441/449 places, 386/394 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 981 ms. Remains : 441/449 places, 386/394 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 104 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-08 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p1:(AND (EQ s388 1) (NEQ s338 1)), p0:(NEQ s338 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1860 steps with 13 reset in 7 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-08 finished in 1112 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(((p0||X((p0&&X(!p0)))) U (G((p0||X((p0&&X(!p0)))))||(p1&&(p0||X((p0&&X(!p0)))))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 442 transition count 387
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 442 transition count 387
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 440 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 440 transition count 385
Applied a total of 18 rules in 36 ms. Remains 440 /449 variables (removed 9) and now considering 385/394 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 385 rows 440 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:09] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 7 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 02:47:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 504 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 714 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-11 02:47:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 216 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 440/449 places, 385/394 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 969 ms. Remains : 440/449 places, 385/394 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 138 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true, true, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(NEQ s342 1), p0:(NEQ s396 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 362 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 348 ms.
Computed a total of 425 stabilizing places and 370 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 996 edges and 440 vertex of which 439 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Computed a total of 425 stabilizing places and 370 stable transitions
Detected a total of 425/440 stabilizing places and 370/385 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge :(AND p1 p0)
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 255 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-09 finished in 2110 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0&&(p1 U p2)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 440 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 440 transition count 385
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 438 transition count 383
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 438 transition count 383
Applied a total of 22 rules in 37 ms. Remains 438 /449 variables (removed 11) and now considering 383/394 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 383 rows 438 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:11] [INFO ] Computed 91 place invariants in 5 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 188 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 02:47:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 512 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 702 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-11 02:47:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:12] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 231 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 438/449 places, 383/394 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 971 ms. Remains : 438/449 places, 383/394 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-10 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(AND (EQ s73 1) (EQ s238 1) (EQ s410 1)), p1:(EQ s337 1), p0:(EQ s337 0)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 129 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-10 finished in 1111 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(((p0 U p1)||F(p0))))'
Support contains 5 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 440 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 440 transition count 385
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 438 transition count 383
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 438 transition count 383
Applied a total of 22 rules in 18 ms. Remains 438 /449 variables (removed 11) and now considering 383/394 (removed 11) transitions.
[2023-03-11 02:47:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 171 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 02:47:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 402 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 576 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-11 02:47:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:13] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 223 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 438/449 places, 383/394 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 819 ms. Remains : 438/449 places, 383/394 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 160 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s411 1) (EQ s414 1)), p1:(AND (EQ s51 1) (EQ s268 1) (EQ s399 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 125 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-11 finished in 997 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 1 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 206 edges and 449 vertex of which 6 / 449 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1003 edges and 444 vertex of which 443 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 442 transition count 338
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 394 transition count 338
Performed 96 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 96 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 394 transition count 242
Deduced a syphon composed of 96 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 210 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 280 transition count 242
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 315 place count 273 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 322 place count 273 transition count 235
Performed 111 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 111
Deduced a syphon composed of 111 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 225 rules applied. Total rules applied 547 place count 159 transition count 124
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 549 place count 158 transition count 128
Applied a total of 549 rules in 74 ms. Remains 158 /449 variables (removed 291) and now considering 128/394 (removed 266) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 158 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:13] [INFO ] Computed 70 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned [1, 4, 5, 28, 29, 30, 31, 38, 39, 40, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 151 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 140/449 places, 128/394 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 232 ms. Remains : 140/449 places, 128/394 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 48 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-12 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(EQ s111 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-12 finished in 300 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 207 edges and 449 vertex of which 6 / 449 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1003 edges and 444 vertex of which 443 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 442 transition count 337
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 393 transition count 337
Performed 96 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 96 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 393 transition count 241
Deduced a syphon composed of 96 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 210 rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 279 transition count 241
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 317 place count 272 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 272 transition count 234
Performed 111 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 111
Deduced a syphon composed of 111 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 225 rules applied. Total rules applied 549 place count 158 transition count 123
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 551 place count 157 transition count 127
Applied a total of 551 rules in 52 ms. Remains 157 /449 variables (removed 292) and now considering 127/394 (removed 267) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 157 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:14] [INFO ] Computed 70 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 154 ms returned [1, 4, 5, 28, 29, 30, 31, 38, 39, 40, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 156 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 139/449 places, 127/394 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 139 /139 variables (removed 0) and now considering 127/127 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 215 ms. Remains : 139/449 places, 127/394 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-14 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(EQ s94 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-14 finished in 312 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 449 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 449/449 places, 394/394 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 207 edges and 449 vertex of which 6 / 449 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1003 edges and 444 vertex of which 443 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 442 transition count 338
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 394 transition count 338
Performed 96 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 96 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 394 transition count 242
Deduced a syphon composed of 96 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 210 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 280 transition count 242
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 316 place count 272 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 272 transition count 234
Performed 111 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 111
Deduced a syphon composed of 111 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 225 rules applied. Total rules applied 549 place count 158 transition count 123
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 551 place count 157 transition count 127
Applied a total of 551 rules in 36 ms. Remains 157 /449 variables (removed 292) and now considering 127/394 (removed 267) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 157 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:14] [INFO ] Computed 70 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [1, 4, 5, 29, 30, 31, 32, 39, 40, 41, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 130 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 139/449 places, 127/394 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 139 /139 variables (removed 0) and now considering 127/127 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 173 ms. Remains : 139/449 places, 127/394 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 41 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-15 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(NEQ s4 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 21765 reset in 357 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 21586 reset in 318 ms.
Computed a total of 130 stabilizing places and 119 stable transitions
Computed a total of 130 stabilizing places and 119 stable transitions
Detected a total of 130/139 stabilizing places and 119/127 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 175 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 28 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2432 resets, run finished after 42 ms. (steps per millisecond=238 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 773 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=588 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 314 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 )
Probabilistic random walk after 314 steps, saw 161 distinct states, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties seen :1
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 196 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 39 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Support contains 1 out of 139 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 139/139 places, 127/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 139 /139 variables (removed 0) and now considering 127/127 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 139 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:15] [INFO ] Computed 52 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 02:47:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 02:47:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 223 ms returned [3, 26, 28, 30, 32, 42, 44, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 351 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/139 places, 127/127 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 370 edges and 111 vertex of which 101 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 10 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 10 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Drop transitions removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 101 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 89 transition count 111
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 80 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 80 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 79 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 79 transition count 79
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 71 transition count 73
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 70 transition count 72
Applied a total of 61 rules in 16 ms. Remains 70 /111 variables (removed 41) and now considering 72/127 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 70 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:16] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned [4]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 60 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 69/139 places, 72/127 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 69 /69 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 441 ms. Remains : 69/139 places, 72/127 transitions.
Computed a total of 60 stabilizing places and 64 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 240 edges and 69 vertex of which 66 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Computed a total of 60 stabilizing places and 64 stable transitions
Detected a total of 60/69 stabilizing places and 64/72 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 145 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 31 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2503 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=714 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 766 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=1666 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 190 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 )
Probabilistic random walk after 190 steps, saw 106 distinct states, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=31 ) properties seen :1
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 165 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 32 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22066 reset in 139 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22104 reset in 137 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 69 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 69 /69 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 69 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/69 places, 72/72 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 68 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 67 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 66 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 66 transition count 69
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 63 transition count 66
Applied a total of 10 rules in 11 ms. Remains 63 /68 variables (removed 5) and now considering 66/72 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 63 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [48, 53, 56]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 60/69 places, 66/72 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 59 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 59 transition count 65
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 58 transition count 64
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 56 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 56 transition count 60
Applied a total of 8 rules in 4 ms. Remains 56 /60 variables (removed 4) and now considering 60/66 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 56 cols
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 56/69 places, 60/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 354 ms. Remains : 56/69 places, 60/72 transitions.
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-15 finished in 3148 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 1 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 2 ms.
[2023-03-11 02:47:17] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 449 places, 394 transitions and 1280 arcs took 6 ms.
Total runtime 30302 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
starting LoLA
BK_INPUT BusinessProcesses-PT-11
BK_EXAMINATION: LTLFireability
bin directory: /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../lola/bin/
current directory: /home/mcc/execution/372
LTLFireability

FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT TOPOLOGICAL STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS USE_NUPN UNFOLDING_TO_PT

BK_STOP 1678502838147

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
lola: MEM LIMIT 32
lola: MEM LIMIT 5
lola: NET
lola: input: PNML file (--pnmlnet)
lola: reading net from /home/mcc/execution/372/model.pnml
lola: reading pnml
lola: PNML file contains place/transition net
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file /home/mcc/execution/372/model.pnml
lola: Reading formula.
lola: Using XML format (--xmlformula)
lola: reading XML formula
lola: reading formula from /home/mcc/execution/372/LTLFireability.xml
lola: Rule S: 0 transitions removed,0 places removed
lola: Created skeleton in 0.000000 secs.
lola: LAUNCH task # 1 (type EXCL) for 0 BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-15
lola: time limit : 3600 sec
lola: memory limit: 32 pages
lola: FINISHED task # 1 (type EXCL) for BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-15
lola: result : false
lola: markings : 101
lola: fired transitions : 171
lola: time used : 0.000000
lola: memory pages used : 1
lola: Portfolio finished: no open formulas

FINAL RESULTS
FINISHED FORMULA: CATEGORY VALUE PRODUCED BY
BusinessProcesses-PT-11-LTLFireability-15: LTL false LTL model checker


Time elapsed: 0 secs. Pages in use: 1

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-11"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="lolaxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool lolaxred"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-11, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r039-tajo-167813692700532"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-11.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-11 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;