fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r037-tajo-167813690600610
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for CANConstruction-PT-005

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
439.031 42090.00 57493.00 196.80 TFTFTTTFTTFTTFFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r037-tajo-167813690600610.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is CANConstruction-PT-005, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r037-tajo-167813690600610
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 696K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 25 21:13 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K Feb 25 21:13 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K Feb 25 21:11 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K Feb 25 21:11 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.7K Feb 25 15:39 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Feb 25 15:39 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K Feb 25 15:39 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Feb 25 15:39 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Feb 25 21:14 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 166K Feb 25 21:14 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Feb 25 21:13 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K Feb 25 21:13 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Feb 25 15:39 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Feb 25 15:39 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 167K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678366235036

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=CANConstruction-PT-005
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-09 12:50:36] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-09 12:50:36] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-09 12:50:36] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 55 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:36] [INFO ] Transformed 112 places.
[2023-03-09 12:50:36] [INFO ] Transformed 140 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:36] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 112 places and 140 transitions and 400 arcs in 143 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 8 ms.
Support contains 77 out of 112 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 111 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 111 transition count 138
Applied a total of 2 rules in 17 ms. Remains 111 /112 variables (removed 1) and now considering 138/140 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 111 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:37] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 5 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 170 ms returned [12, 68]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 211 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/112 places, 138/140 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 108 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 108 transition count 137
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 108 /109 variables (removed 1) and now considering 137/138 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 108 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:37] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:50:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:50:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:50:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 108/112 places, 137/140 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 387 ms. Remains : 108/112 places, 137/140 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 108 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
Support contains 76 out of 108 places (down from 77) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 130 resets, run finished after 466 ms. (steps per millisecond=21 ) properties (out of 72) seen :66
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 32 resets, run finished after 67 ms. (steps per millisecond=149 ) properties (out of 6) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 40 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 41 ms. (steps per millisecond=243 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 31 resets, run finished after 43 ms. (steps per millisecond=232 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 38 ms. (steps per millisecond=263 ) properties (out of 5) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 42 ms. (steps per millisecond=238 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 4 properties.
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 6 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] After 62ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] After 23ms SMT Verify possible using 45 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:3
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] After 179ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:3
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 6 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] After 48ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :3
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] After 22ms SMT Verify possible using 45 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :3
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] After 54ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :3
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 22 ms.
[2023-03-09 12:50:38] [INFO ] After 177ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :3
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 4 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 26 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 26 transitions
Performed 26 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 108 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 82 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 81 transition count 110
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 81 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 78 transition count 107
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 65 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 65 transition count 81
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 65 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 64 transition count 80
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 60 transition count 76
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -9
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 55 transition count 85
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 55 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 52 transition count 82
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 52 transition count 82
Applied a total of 113 rules in 65 ms. Remains 52 /108 variables (removed 56) and now considering 82/137 (removed 55) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 65 ms. Remains : 52/108 places, 82/137 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 346 resets, run finished after 96 ms. (steps per millisecond=104 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 69 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=400 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=322 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 65 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=322 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 4507 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 25244 steps, saw 4507 distinct states, run finished after 174 ms. (steps per millisecond=145 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 4507 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 25244 steps, saw 4507 distinct states, run finished after 83 ms. (steps per millisecond=304 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 24 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 95 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 95 transition count 112
Applied a total of 26 rules in 12 ms. Remains 95 /108 variables (removed 13) and now considering 112/137 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 95 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 8 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 240 ms returned [24, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 244 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/108 places, 112/137 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 89 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 89 transition count 109
Applied a total of 6 rules in 13 ms. Remains 89 /92 variables (removed 3) and now considering 109/112 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 89 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 7 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 232 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/108 places, 109/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 501 ms. Remains : 89/108 places, 109/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17093985109138357522.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3600244049865382946.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17093985109138357522.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3600244049865382946.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,93219,0.061869,6348,2,1929,5,12326,6,0,450,10839,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((Node1GiveAnswer0<1) + EF(AX((Node3GiveAnswer4>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((Node1GiveAnswer0<1) + E(TRUE U !(EX(!((Node3GiveAnswer4>=1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t69, t70, t73, t74, t83, t84, ...265
(forward)formula 0,1,0.634333,35012,1,0,235,145240,245,135,2768,152701,291
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 108 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 76 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 75 transition count 104
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 75 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 73 transition count 102
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 59 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 59 transition count 74
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 59 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 56 transition count 71
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 53 transition count 68
Applied a total of 110 rules in 32 ms. Remains 53 /108 variables (removed 55) and now considering 68/137 (removed 69) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 53 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned [8, 14, 21]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 151 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/108 places, 68/137 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 50 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 44 transition count 62
Applied a total of 12 rules in 11 ms. Remains 44 /50 variables (removed 6) and now considering 62/68 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 44 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/108 places, 62/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 310 ms. Remains : 44/108 places, 62/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3032393955112514509.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14519860480971572369.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3032393955112514509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14519860480971572369.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3789,0.049009,6228,2,1644,5,12244,6,0,223,8876,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EF((Node3DHTinfo2>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (Node3DHTinfo2>=1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t6, t9, t12, t15, t18, t58, t59, Intersection with reachable at each step enable...205
(forward)formula 0,0,0.265402,16524,1,0,128,61020,149,75,1494,43347,155
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 98 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 98 transition count 118
Applied a total of 20 rules in 12 ms. Remains 98 /108 variables (removed 10) and now considering 118/137 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 98 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned [24, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/108 places, 118/137 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 92 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 92 transition count 115
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 92 /95 variables (removed 3) and now considering 115/118 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 92 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/108 places, 115/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 274 ms. Remains : 92/108 places, 115/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10394523728949863782.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14189658005782292790.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10394523728949863782.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14189658005782292790.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94542,0.065408,6716,2,2018,5,14458,6,0,468,12161,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((EG((((Node0Request>=1)&&(Node3IsInserted>=1))&&((Node2Request>=1)&&(Node3IsInserted>=1)))) + EF(EG((Node3GiveAnswer2<1)))) * (EG(((E...539
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U EG((Node3GiveAnswer2<1))))) * !(EG((((Node0Request>=1)&&(Node3IsInserted>=1))&&((Node2...798
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t58, t61, t62, t65, t66, t69, t73, t74, ...308
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,7.30339,207536,1,0,988,1.27176e+06,285,592,2877,1.16482e+06,1111
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 98 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 98 transition count 118
Applied a total of 20 rules in 6 ms. Remains 98 /108 variables (removed 10) and now considering 118/137 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 98 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:48] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [24, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/108 places, 118/137 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 92 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 92 transition count 115
Applied a total of 6 rules in 4 ms. Remains 92 /95 variables (removed 3) and now considering 115/118 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 92 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 180 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/108 places, 115/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 290 ms. Remains : 92/108 places, 115/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17795982045734515771.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4765294091781830747.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17795982045734515771.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4765294091781830747.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94386,0.090096,6716,2,1995,5,14291,6,0,468,12752,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AX(((E((Node0Bootstrap>=1) U ((Node3IsInserted>=1)&&(Node4Request>=1))) * (AG(((Node1IsInserted>=1)&&(Node3requestsent1>=1))) + ((Nod...668
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(((E((Node0Bootstrap>=1) U ((Node3IsInserted>=1)&&(Node4Request>=1))) * (!(E(TRUE U !(((Node...1379
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t58, t61, t65, t69, t70, t73, t74, t81, ...303
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,3.64504,119280,1,0,507,622373,288,334,2868,609873,618
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 31 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 31 transitions
Performed 31 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 31
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 108 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 77 transition count 106
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 77 transition count 103
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 74 transition count 103
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 60 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 60 transition count 75
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 60 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 57 transition count 72
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 54 transition count 69
Applied a total of 108 rules in 20 ms. Remains 54 /108 variables (removed 54) and now considering 69/137 (removed 68) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 54 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned [10, 16, 23]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/108 places, 69/137 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 51 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 46 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 45 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 45 transition count 63
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 45 /51 variables (removed 6) and now considering 63/69 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 45 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/108 places, 63/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 179 ms. Remains : 45/108 places, 63/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4735196331326122812.gal : 0 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7548643385418037539.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4735196331326122812.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7548643385418037539.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4349,0.077077,6224,2,1719,5,13146,6,0,228,10303,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((Node1Request>=1)&&(Node3IsInserted>=1)) U EF(EG((Node1JoinMsg>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(FwdU(Init,((Node1Request>=1)&&(Node3IsInserted>=1))),TRUE),(Node1JoinMsg>=1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 50/12/13
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 61/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.299107,14144,1,0,13,52257,27,2,1236,29379,16
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 28 rules in 5 ms. Remains 94 /108 variables (removed 14) and now considering 110/137 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [24, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/108 places, 110/137 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/108 places, 107/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 296 ms. Remains : 88/108 places, 107/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13562575519648814283.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17210212793711515411.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13562575519648814283.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17210212793711515411.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.073048,6144,2,1724,5,11757,6,0,444,9827,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((!(A((!(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node4ReadyToInsert>=1))) + EG((Node3GiveAnswer4>=1))) U !(E((Node2IsNonInsertedNode>=1) U (Node2ID>=1)))...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(!((E(!(!(E((Node2IsNonInsertedNode>=1) U (Node2ID>=1)))) U (!((!(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node4ReadyT...364
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t69, t70, t73, t97, t98, Inte...249
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.82581,103892,1,0,561,544383,257,382,2605,627753,584
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 23 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 23 transitions
Performed 23 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 23
Iterating post reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 108 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 85 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 80 transition count 109
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 80 transition count 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 77 transition count 106
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 64 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 64 transition count 80
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 64 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 63 transition count 79
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 59 transition count 75
Applied a total of 98 rules in 15 ms. Remains 59 /108 variables (removed 49) and now considering 75/137 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 59 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:56] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 241 ms returned [27]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 243 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/108 places, 75/137 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 58 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 56 transition count 73
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 56 /58 variables (removed 2) and now considering 73/75 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 56 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:56] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:50:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:50:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:50:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 56/108 places, 73/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 364 ms. Remains : 56/108 places, 73/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17443700484808991114.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12866873939709240616.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17443700484808991114.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12866873939709240616.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7535,0.061311,6840,2,2303,5,14429,6,0,282,12291,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((Node1ID2>=1)||((((Node1WaitAnswer>=1)&&(Node1OKshare>=1))&&((Node3GiveAnswer4<1)&&((Node3ID>=1)||(Node2DHTinfo>=1))))&&((Node2WaitAn...184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((Node1ID2>=1)||((((Node1WaitAnswer>=1)&&(Node1OKshare>=1))&&((Node3GiveAnswer4<1)&&((Node3ID>=1)||...229
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 56/17/17
(forward)formula 0,0,0.315363,18876,1,0,14,71149,20,4,1454,46141,12
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 31 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 31 transitions
Performed 31 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 31
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 108 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 77 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 76 transition count 105
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 76 transition count 103
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 74 transition count 103
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 62 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 62 transition count 79
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 62 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 61 transition count 78
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 55 transition count 72
Applied a total of 106 rules in 7 ms. Remains 55 /108 variables (removed 53) and now considering 72/137 (removed 65) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 55 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [10, 16, 22]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/108 places, 72/137 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 52 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 48 transition count 68
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 46 transition count 66
Applied a total of 12 rules in 6 ms. Remains 46 /52 variables (removed 6) and now considering 66/72 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 46 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 46/108 places, 66/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 194 ms. Remains : 46/108 places, 66/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9502217500144684709.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1329937700973247541.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9502217500144684709.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1329937700973247541.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4029,0.064343,6520,2,1990,5,13293,6,0,235,11575,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((Node0Bootstrap>=1) U AF(((Node1GiveAnswer4>=1)&&(Node2GiveAnswer3>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(Node0Bootstrap>=1)) * !(EG(!(((Node1GiveAnswer4>=1)&&(Node2GiveAnswer3>=1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t8, t12, t53, t54, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, Intersection with...235
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 64/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.845454,42312,1,0,238,228238,162,128,1503,177187,262
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 108 transition count 113
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 84 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 83 transition count 112
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 83 transition count 108
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 79 transition count 108
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 66 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 66 transition count 82
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 66 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 65 transition count 81
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 63 transition count 79
Applied a total of 90 rules in 16 ms. Remains 63 /108 variables (removed 45) and now considering 79/137 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 63 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [12, 18]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/108 places, 79/137 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 61 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 58 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 57 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 57 transition count 75
Applied a total of 8 rules in 4 ms. Remains 57 /61 variables (removed 4) and now considering 75/79 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 57 cols
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Computed 7 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 57/108 places, 75/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 57/108 places, 75/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12479967749525119327.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:50:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4278221530600459276.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12479967749525119327.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4278221530600459276.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,12396,0.061876,6844,2,2075,5,14228,6,0,288,12253,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E((Node4IsNonInsertedNode>=1) U (!(AF((((Node3IsInserted>=1)&&(Node4Request>=1))||(Node3GiveAnswer4>=1)))) + (((Node3IsInserted>=1)&&(N...403
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,E((Node4IsNonInsertedNode>=1) U (!(!(EG(!((((Node3IsInserted>=1)&&(Node4Request>=1))||(Node3GiveAns...948
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t3, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t19, t23, t31, t34, t58, t73, t74, Intersection with reach...229
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.69359,72368,1,0,859,382184,205,473,1848,371618,957
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 97 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 97 transition count 116
Applied a total of 22 rules in 1 ms. Remains 97 /108 variables (removed 11) and now considering 116/137 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 97 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/108 places, 116/137 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 95 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 95 transition count 115
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 95 /96 variables (removed 1) and now considering 115/116 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 95 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 164 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 95/108 places, 115/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 223 ms. Remains : 95/108 places, 115/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2025534417111781706.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5172083927867600966.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2025534417111781706.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5172083927867600966.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94044,0.086027,6724,2,1966,5,12938,6,0,480,11818,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((!((EX(((Node2Bootstrap<1)||(((Node2WaitAnswer>=1)&&(Node2NOshare>=1))&&(Node2GiveAnswer0>=1)))) * !(AF((Node2ID2>=1))))) + AG(((Node...623
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((!((EX(((Node2Bootstrap<1)||(((Node2WaitAnswer>=1)&&(Node2NOshare>=1))&&(Node2GiveAnswer0>=1)))) *...717
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t15, t20, t27, t32, t38, t39, t49, t50, t59, t60, t67, t71, t72, t75, t76, t85, t86, ...286
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,3.94686,141716,1,0,748,818304,285,454,2971,763091,853
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 95 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 95 transition count 112
Applied a total of 26 rules in 2 ms. Remains 95 /108 variables (removed 13) and now considering 112/137 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 95 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [24, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/108 places, 112/137 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 89 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 89 transition count 109
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 89 /92 variables (removed 3) and now considering 109/112 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 89 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/108 places, 109/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 163 ms. Remains : 89/108 places, 109/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14516839622741614379.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16843106424875693276.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14516839622741614379.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16843106424875693276.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,93219,0.081423,6688,2,1845,5,13051,6,0,450,10835,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((((Node0GiveAnswer1>=1) + (EG((Node4Bootstrap>=1)) * !((((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node2ReadyToInsert>=1))||((Node0Request>=1)&&(Node1IsIn...260
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((EmptyCAN>=1)&&(Node1ReadyToInsert>=1)))))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((Empt...475
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t58, t61, t62, t65, t69, t73, t85, t86, ...266
(forward)formula 0,1,0.751551,33084,1,0,225,141156,249,131,2652,138782,287
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 97 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 97 transition count 116
Applied a total of 22 rules in 1 ms. Remains 97 /108 variables (removed 11) and now considering 116/137 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 97 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [24, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 60 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/108 places, 116/137 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 91 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 91 transition count 113
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 91 /94 variables (removed 3) and now considering 113/116 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 91 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/108 places, 113/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 221 ms. Remains : 91/108 places, 113/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16288625576661310576.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9738290182644996686.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16288625576661310576.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9738290182644996686.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,94202,0.121574,6700,2,1905,5,13376,6,0,462,11830,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AF((Node4GiveAnswer2<1)) * EG(!(E((Node3ID2>=1) U ((Node0IsInserted>=1)&&(Node1Request>=1)))))) * ((A((Node1DHTinfo>=1) U ((EmptyCAN...522
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((EY(Init) * (!(EG(!((Node4GiveAnswer2<1)))) * EG(!(E((Node3ID2>=1) U ((Node0IsInserted>=1)&&(Node1Request>=...1487
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t58, t61, t62, t65, t66, t69, t70, t73, ...296
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,6.07185,178288,1,0,849,1.00822e+06,273,520,2853,1.18108e+06,946
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 93 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 93 transition count 108
Applied a total of 30 rules in 4 ms. Remains 93 /108 variables (removed 15) and now considering 108/137 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 93 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [24, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 87 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/108 places, 108/137 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 87 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 87 transition count 105
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 87 /90 variables (removed 3) and now considering 105/108 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 87 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 87/108 places, 105/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 241 ms. Remains : 87/108 places, 105/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9779664624411618295.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17757149200765442123.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9779664624411618295.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17757149200765442123.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92262,0.071832,6148,2,1711,5,12001,6,0,438,9686,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((Node2JoinMsg<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((Node2JoinMsg<1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t69, t73, Intersection with r...234
(forward)formula 0,0,0.456808,21704,1,0,173,78480,226,106,2417,81684,217
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 28 rules in 2 ms. Remains 94 /108 variables (removed 14) and now considering 110/137 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [24, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/108 places, 110/137 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 175 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/108 places, 107/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 255 ms. Remains : 88/108 places, 107/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9049989866880768958.gal : 0 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8712272678923959975.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9049989866880768958.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8712272678923959975.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.106064,6412,2,1795,5,12203,6,0,444,9922,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(!(EG(A((Node3Bootstrap>=1) U ((Node2IsInserted>=1)&&(Node3Request>=1))))) U (!(((Node3ID<1)||(Node0GiveAnswer2>=1))) + AG((EF(((Node...221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!(EG(!((E(!(((Node2IsInserted>=1)&&(Node3Request>=1))) U (!((Node3Bootstrap>=1)) * !(((Node2IsInser...399
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t62, t65, t69, t73, t77, t78, Inte...249
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,2.83965,98292,1,0,527,564675,264,300,2735,548742,639
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 94 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 94 transition count 110
Applied a total of 28 rules in 2 ms. Remains 94 /108 variables (removed 14) and now considering 110/137 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 94 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [24, 38, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/108 places, 110/137 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 107
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/110 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 88 cols
[2023-03-09 12:51:15] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 12:51:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 12:51:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 12:51:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/108 places, 107/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 213 ms. Remains : 88/108 places, 107/137 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2023-03-09 12:51:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6333587699827801565.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2223659206681714507.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6333587699827801565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2223659206681714507.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,92734,0.073411,6412,2,1753,5,12265,6,0,444,10408,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(E(EX(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node4ReadyToInsert>=1))) U EG((Node4GiveAnswer0>=1)))) * AF(((EG((Node1JoinMsg>=1)) + AX(((Node0Request...233
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(EX(((InsertedCount>=1)&&(Node4ReadyToInsert>=1))) U EG((Node4GiveAnswer0>=1)))))))...303
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t14, t15, t25, t26, t36, t37, t47, t48, t57, t61, t65, t69, t73, t74, t99, t100, Int...250
(forward)formula 0,1,0.768138,29960,1,0,241,127442,253,140,2506,137892,304
FORMULA CANConstruction-PT-005-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2023-03-09 12:51:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-09 12:51:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Total runtime 40099 ms.

BK_STOP 1678366277126

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CANConstruction-PT-005"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is CANConstruction-PT-005, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r037-tajo-167813690600610"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CANConstruction-PT-005.tgz
mv CANConstruction-PT-005 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;