Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r037-tajo-167813690000170.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r037-tajo-167813690000170
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.6M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Feb 25 12:04 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K Feb 25 12:04 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K Feb 25 12:03 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 218K Feb 25 12:03 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Jan 29 11:40 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Feb 25 15:35 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K Feb 25 15:35 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 15:35 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K Feb 25 15:35 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Feb 25 12:09 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 193K Feb 25 12:09 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 118K Feb 25 12:08 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 526K Feb 25 12:08 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Feb 25 15:35 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Feb 25 15:35 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 223K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678328866562

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 48 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Transformed 48 places.
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Transformed 288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 48 places and 288 transitions and 2090 arcs in 106 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 17 ms.
Support contains 46 out of 48 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 48/48 places, 288/288 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 46 transition count 288
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 46 /48 variables (removed 2) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 7 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 281 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:27:48] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 114 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/48 places, 288/288 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 518 ms. Remains : 46/48 places, 288/288 transitions.
Support contains 46 out of 46 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-09 02:27:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 111 resets, run finished after 577 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 ) properties (out of 64) seen :37
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 44 ms. (steps per millisecond=22 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 34 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 27) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 27 properties.
[2023-03-09 02:27:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:27:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:27:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-09 02:27:51] [INFO ] After 349ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :4 sat :0 real:23
[2023-03-09 02:27:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2023-03-09 02:27:51] [INFO ] After 154ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :23
[2023-03-09 02:27:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:27:51] [INFO ] After 184ms SMT Verify possible using 22 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :23
[2023-03-09 02:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-09 02:27:51] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 60 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:52] [INFO ] After 677ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :7 sat :20
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 536 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:27:52] [INFO ] After 1457ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :7 sat :20
Fused 27 Parikh solutions to 20 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 129 ms.
Support contains 25 out of 46 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 43 transition count 286
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 41 transition count 284
Applied a total of 9 rules in 47 ms. Remains 41 /46 variables (removed 5) and now considering 284/288 (removed 4) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 48 ms. Remains : 41/46 places, 284/288 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 154 resets, run finished after 283 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties (out of 20) seen :4
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 16 properties.
[2023-03-09 02:27:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 41 cols
[2023-03-09 02:27:53] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2023-03-09 02:27:53] [INFO ] After 157ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:16
[2023-03-09 02:27:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2023-03-09 02:27:53] [INFO ] After 97ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :16
[2023-03-09 02:27:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:27:53] [INFO ] After 132ms SMT Verify possible using 22 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :16
[2023-03-09 02:27:54] [INFO ] After 298ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :16
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 124 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:27:54] [INFO ] After 577ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :16
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 107 ms.
Support contains 23 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 284/284 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 284/284 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 284/284 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 154 resets, run finished after 299 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties (out of 16) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 67 resets, run finished after 157 ms. (steps per millisecond=63 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 69 resets, run finished after 95 ms. (steps per millisecond=105 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 78 ms. (steps per millisecond=128 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 64 resets, run finished after 74 ms. (steps per millisecond=135 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 67 resets, run finished after 79 ms. (steps per millisecond=126 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 71 resets, run finished after 86 ms. (steps per millisecond=116 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 85 ms. (steps per millisecond=117 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 63 resets, run finished after 75 ms. (steps per millisecond=133 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 64 resets, run finished after 77 ms. (steps per millisecond=129 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 63 resets, run finished after 72 ms. (steps per millisecond=138 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 67 resets, run finished after 77 ms. (steps per millisecond=129 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 64 resets, run finished after 72 ms. (steps per millisecond=138 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 69 resets, run finished after 78 ms. (steps per millisecond=128 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 70 resets, run finished after 81 ms. (steps per millisecond=123 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 14 properties.
[2023-03-09 02:27:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:27:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:27:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-09 02:27:55] [INFO ] After 133ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:14
[2023-03-09 02:27:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-09 02:27:56] [INFO ] After 123ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :14
[2023-03-09 02:27:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:27:56] [INFO ] After 119ms SMT Verify possible using 22 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :14
[2023-03-09 02:27:56] [INFO ] After 264ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :14
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 109 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:27:56] [INFO ] After 571ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :14
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 26 ms.
Support contains 21 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 284/284 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 284/284 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 10 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 284/284 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 154 resets, run finished after 152 ms. (steps per millisecond=65 ) properties (out of 14) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 87 ms. (steps per millisecond=114 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 68 resets, run finished after 100 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 67 resets, run finished after 74 ms. (steps per millisecond=135 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 64 resets, run finished after 74 ms. (steps per millisecond=135 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 100 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 79 ms. (steps per millisecond=126 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 63 resets, run finished after 78 ms. (steps per millisecond=128 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 64 resets, run finished after 88 ms. (steps per millisecond=113 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 62 resets, run finished after 87 ms. (steps per millisecond=114 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 65 resets, run finished after 89 ms. (steps per millisecond=112 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 63 resets, run finished after 92 ms. (steps per millisecond=108 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 69 resets, run finished after 97 ms. (steps per millisecond=103 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 67 resets, run finished after 93 ms. (steps per millisecond=107 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 133520 steps, run visited all 13 properties in 482 ms. (steps per millisecond=277 )
Probabilistic random walk after 133520 steps, saw 37968 distinct states, run finished after 483 ms. (steps per millisecond=276 ) properties seen :13
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
Computed a total of 29 stabilizing places and 44 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 7 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 116 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:27:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:27:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned [28]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 244 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability877949282033524180.gal : 4 ms
[2023-03-09 02:27:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9959036733801743868.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability877949282033524180.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9959036733801743868.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,17.1652,479020,2,131211,5,534568,6,0,470,736443,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(A(((((AF((((((((CHOIX_2>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_6>=1))||((CHOIX_2>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_7>=1)))||(((CHOIX_2>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_4>=1))||((CHOIX_2>=1)&&(C...12401
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTE...28558
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:213)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-09 02:28:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-09 02:28:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:28:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15841574286741655432.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15841574286741655432.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15841574286741655432.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15841574286741655432.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15841574286741655432.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:28:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:28:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:28:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 512 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:28:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
[2023-03-09 02:28:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 115 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:28:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10029480526370541227.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 02:28:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17306939398475932325.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10029480526370541227.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17306939398475932325.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,12.5398,302796,1350,1404,93732,36061,133,3.29332e+06,141,532113,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(A(((((AF((((((((u1.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_6>=1))||((u1.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_7>=1)))||(((u1.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEU...15812
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((i1.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i1.u2.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u2.NB_ATTENT...40440
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t57, t193, t200, u1.t11, u1.t24, i2.t90, i2.t80, Intersection with r...233
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 167 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 120 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 399 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-09 02:28:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2023-03-09 02:29:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:29:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2023-03-09 02:29:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2023-03-09 02:29:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8818073745410127601.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 02:29:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17206925549019704563.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8818073745410127601.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17206925549019704563.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,19.9907,502280,2,207776,5,393585,6,0,474,730624,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX((SUR_PONT_B>=1)) U (((((AF((((((AX((SUR_PONT_B>=1)) + ((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))) + (((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_3>=1))||(...31425
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((((!(EG(!((((((!(EX(!((SUR_PONT_B>=1)))) + ((ROUTE_A>=1)&&(NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))) + (((ROUTE_A>...91454
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:213)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
[2023-03-09 02:29:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-09 02:29:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:29:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2605216103768429193.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2605216103768429193.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2605216103768429193.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2605216103768429193.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2605216103768429193.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:29:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:29:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:29:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 531 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:29:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2023-03-09 02:29:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 133 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:29:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16439438654756933386.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:29:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8246871328096543650.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16439438654756933386.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8246871328096543650.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,4.72457,71196,2530,664,82977,5324,127,309109,110,41264,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX((i0.u2.SUR_PONT_B>=1)) U (((((AF((((((AX((i0.u2.SUR_PONT_B>=1)) + ((i0.u0.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))) + (((i0.u0.ROUTE_...40239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((((!(EG(!((((((!(EX(!((i0.u2.SUR_PONT_B>=1)))) + ((i0.u0.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=...120774
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t57, t70, t79, i0.u2.t11, i0.u2.t24, i1.t266, i1.t256, Intersection ...238
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 135 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned [12]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 248 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14914810315711480388.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 02:30:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6955531464408135618.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14914810315711480388.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6955531464408135618.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,13.6808,367292,2,128585,5,455610,6,0,470,555403,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EF(((((((((((CAPACITE>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(ATTENTE_B>=1)))||(((CAPACITE>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTE...21486
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((CAPACITE>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(ATTENTE_B>=1)))||(((C...39953
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:213)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-09 02:30:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2023-03-09 02:30:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:30:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7925809353276671843.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7925809353276671843.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7925809353276671843.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7925809353276671843.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7925809353276671843.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:30:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:30:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:30:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 545 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:30:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2023-03-09 02:30:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 108 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:30:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15278004288043756585.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 02:30:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11832621288320123160.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15278004288043756585.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11832621288320123160.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.4848,44568,786,1023,48347,16610,168,215897,149,117958,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EF(((((((((((u0.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i1.u2.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i2.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(i2.u4.ATTENTE_B>=1)))||(((u0.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i1.u...27480
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((u0.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i1.u2.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i2.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(i2.u4....51828
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t57, t100, t101, t155, t156, u0.t11, u0.t24, i1.t200, i1.t196, Inter...247
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 22 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 153 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned [28]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 287 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12901780558674066508.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 02:31:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13762482445128075788.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12901780558674066508.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13762482445128075788.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,18.8108,478912,2,131211,5,534568,6,0,470,736443,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EG((((((((CHOIX_2<1)||(COMPTEUR_6<1))&&((CHOIX_2<1)||(COMPTEUR_7<1)))&&(((CHOIX_2<1)||(COMPTEUR_4<1))&&((CHOIX_2<1)||(COMPTEUR_5<1)))...12450
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(EG((((((((CHOIX_2<1)||(COMPTEUR_6<1))&&((CHOIX_2<1)||(COMPTEUR_7<1)))&&(((CHOIX_2<...12125
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:213)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
[2023-03-09 02:31:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2023-03-09 02:31:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:31:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3878559260689983341.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3878559260689983341.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3878559260689983341.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3878559260689983341.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3878559260689983341.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:31:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:31:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:31:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 545 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:31:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2023-03-09 02:31:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 98 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:31:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8168905486431261062.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:31:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12405927097032704856.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8168905486431261062.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12405927097032704856.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,3.19558,56704,1539,1048,48123,16202,163,170734,149,300255,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EG((((((((i1.u2.CHOIX_2<1)||(i1.u4.COMPTEUR_6<1))&&((i1.u2.CHOIX_2<1)||(i1.u4.COMPTEUR_7<1)))&&(((i1.u2.CHOIX_2<1)||(i1.u4.COMPTEUR_4...15963
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(EG((((((((i1.u2.CHOIX_2<1)||(i1.u4.COMPTEUR_6<1))&&((i1.u2.CHOIX_2<1)||(i1.u4.COMP...16234
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t82, t90, t236, t244, i0.u1.t11, i0.u1.t24, i1.t222, i1.t212, i1.t57,...254
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:32:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:32:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:32:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 155 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:32:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:32:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:32:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:32:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:32:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:32:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:32:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 291 ms. Remains : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:32:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-09 02:32:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-09 02:32:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:32:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-09 02:32:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-09 02:32:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9655906584637930668.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 02:32:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8021831713335246016.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9655906584637930668.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8021831713335246016.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,18.4189,475828,2,58987,5,767172,6,0,466,804609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EG(((E(!(((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_3>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_7>=1)))||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(CONTROLEU...29020
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_...44707
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:213)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-09 02:32:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2023-03-09 02:32:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:32:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9812905046377558320.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9812905046377558320.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9812905046377558320.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9812905046377558320.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9812905046377558320.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:32:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:32:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:32:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 493 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:32:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2023-03-09 02:32:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 58 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:32:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6873123237430966724.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:32:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1730238748923164235.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6873123237430966724.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1730238748923164235.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.02474,36320,806,1008,28966,19779,87,70509,121,317779,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EG(((E(!(((((((((((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u3.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_3>=1)&&(u0.COMPTEUR_7>=1)))||(((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>...33061
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(u2.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((u2.NB_A...54836
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t57, t89, t90, t199, t200, u1.t11, u1.t24, Intersection with reachab...227
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 159 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 343 ms. Remains : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1584432711894193053.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 02:33:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1747144663582569091.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1584432711894193053.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1747144663582569091.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,18.2379,476580,2,58987,5,767172,6,0,466,804609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-09 02:33:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2023-03-09 02:33:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:33:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph846583510598615484.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph846583510598615484.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph846583510598615484.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph846583510598615484.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph846583510598615484.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:33:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:33:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:33:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 541 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:33:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2023-03-09 02:33:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 98 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:33:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability496295973773682618.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 02:33:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability347388348933430119.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability496295973773682618.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability347388348933430119.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...260
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,7.3443,121888,3037,1095,112691,20173,159,573517,144,326718,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EX(((EG((((i0.u4.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i0.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i1.u1.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i0.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1)))) * EG((i1.u1.SUR_PONT_A>=1))) ...683
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((EG((((i0.u4.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i0.u0.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i1.u1.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i0...747
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t57, t146, t156, t179, t189, i0.t68, i0.t67, i0.t56, i1.u1.t11, i1.u1.t24,...254
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 24 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 135 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned [12, 27]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 275 ms. Remains : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14529661772535213826.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16974869927848390653.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14529661772535213826.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16974869927848390653.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,164516,23.5522,552960,2,42000,5,965039,6,0,461,973837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((AF((((((((((SUR_PONT_B>=1)||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(COMPTEUR_6>=1))))||((((NB_ATTENTE_A_...28928
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((((((((((SUR_PONT_B>=1)||(((NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((NB_ATTENTE...28415
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:213)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
[2023-03-09 02:34:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:34:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11171538379957069491.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11171538379957069491.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11171538379957069491.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11171538379957069491.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11171538379957069491.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:34:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:34:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:34:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 619 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:34:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 117 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:34:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3650245139138819441.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16615954113745302759.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3650245139138819441.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16615954113745302759.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,164516,3.46026,101820,964,505,137320,12129,199,631011,120,117502,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((AF((((((((((i1.u2.SUR_PONT_B>=1)||(((i2.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i2.u1.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i2.u1.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.COMPTE...36986
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((((((((((i1.u2.SUR_PONT_B>=1)||(((i2.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i2.u1.CONTROLEUR_2>...37053
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t22, t24, t55, t95, t100, t117, t122, t238, t243, t277, t279, t280, t284, i1.u2.t23,...280
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,24.5341,416996,1,0,589860,73709,2263,2.29275e+06,721,649505,491182
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 147 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 344 ms. Remains : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10837190625058085983.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 02:34:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6867630954380766335.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10837190625058085983.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6867630954380766335.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,24.6132,553228,2,59968,5,819856,6,0,461,1.03138e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-09 02:35:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-09 02:35:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:35:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15538313989758364609.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15538313989758364609.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15538313989758364609.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15538313989758364609.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15538313989758364609.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:35:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:35:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:35:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 493 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:35:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2023-03-09 02:35:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 58 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:35:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6865676513602571195.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:35:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6525051004804048581.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6865676513602571195.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6525051004804048581.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,2.26613,66680,551,1180,73661,34952,87,127531,119,546248,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(!(E((((u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1)&&(u1.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((u1.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(u3.COMPTEUR_8>=1))) U (((u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_2>=1)&&(u1...673
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E((((u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1)&&(u1.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((u1.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(u3.CO...1074
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t24, t55, t56, t93, t100, t170, t177, u0.t11, Intersection with reachable at e...220
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:35:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:35:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 160 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 240 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 411 ms. Remains : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5996542707890134767.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-09 02:35:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2909438788976401470.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5996542707890134767.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2909438788976401470.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,23.9256,552328,2,59968,5,819856,6,0,461,1.03138e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-09 02:36:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2023-03-09 02:36:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:36:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11221547171610030833.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11221547171610030833.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11221547171610030833.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11221547171610030833.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11221547171610030833.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:36:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:36:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:36:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 493 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:36:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2023-03-09 02:36:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 58 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:36:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18398788007960939125.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:36:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10230125121190652615.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18398788007960939125.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10230125121190652615.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.43188,34472,642,686,27054,17792,87,65399,119,309358,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AF(AG((((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u3.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_10>=1)&&(u1.COMPTEUR_10>=1))))) + ((AF(EX((((u2.NB_ATTENTE_A...276
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u3.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_10>=...383
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t24, t55, t56, t141, t144, t185, t188, u0.t11, Intersection with reachable at ...221
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:36:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:36:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:36:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 120 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:36:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:36:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:36:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:36:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:36:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:36:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:37:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 349 ms. Remains : 43/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:37:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-09 02:37:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-09 02:37:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:37:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-09 02:37:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-09 02:37:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7028488209286099674.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 02:37:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14459711651845979056.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7028488209286099674.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14459711651845979056.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,28.0341,551808,2,59968,5,819856,6,0,461,1.03138e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-09 02:37:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-09 02:37:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:37:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16620436753552300488.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16620436753552300488.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16620436753552300488.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16620436753552300488.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16620436753552300488.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:37:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:37:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:37:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 551 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:37:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2023-03-09 02:37:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 97 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:37:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13756311459632226771.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 02:37:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7197124732844264657.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13756311459632226771.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7197124732844264657.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.74952,43996,887,773,35131,16359,159,114690,141,295791,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((AG(((A((((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A_5>=1)&&(i2.u1.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i2.u1.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.COMPTEUR_8>=1))) U (((i2.u1.NB_ATT...634
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((!(E(TRUE U !(((!((E(!((((i2.u1.NB_ATTENTE_A_9>=1)&&(i2.u1.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i2.u1.NB_ATTENTE_...938
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t24, t55, t138, t144, t171, t177, i0.u0.t11, i2.t276, i2.t267, i2.t56, Interse...245
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 46 cols
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 5 ms
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 133 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned [12, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 175 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 288/288 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 310 ms. Remains : 44/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6284280517839564946.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:38:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1567891238711598883.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6284280517839564946.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1567891238711598883.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,19.9918,476084,2,58987,5,767172,6,0,466,804609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-09 02:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2023-03-09 02:38:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11578306791711487672.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11578306791711487672.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11578306791711487672.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11578306791711487672.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11578306791711487672.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:38:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:38:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:38:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 592 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:38:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2023-03-09 02:38:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 97 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4903544712632049633.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:38:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2725584432370530144.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4903544712632049633.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2725584432370530144.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,1.18995,34456,554,874,26715,17154,129,70806,138,298247,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EX(EG((!((((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u3.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i1.u4.COMPTEUR_5>=1)))) + EX((((i0.u2.NB_ATTENTE_A...868
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,(EX(EG((!((((u3.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(u3.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i1.u4.COMP...939
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t82, t90, t192, t200, i0.u0.t11, i0.u0.t24, i1.t57, Intersection wit...236
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 288/288 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 45 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 287
Applied a total of 2 rules in 23 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 287/288 (removed 1) transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:39:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 45 cols
[2023-03-09 02:39:00] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 159 ms found 0 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 198 similar events)
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned [12]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 358 ms. Remains : 44/46 places, 287/288 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6606659489026834433.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-09 02:39:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6705071075530431486.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6606659489026834433.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6705071075530431486.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,25.9886,517164,2,138655,5,633428,6,0,465,843439,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-09 02:39:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-09 02:39:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:39:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5843276145750934847.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5843276145750934847.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5843276145750934847.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5843276145750934847.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5843276145750934847.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:39:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:39:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:39:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 512 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:39:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2023-03-09 02:39:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 105 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:39:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14967198820516430303.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:39:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5155148016976414925.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14967198820516430303.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5155148016976414925.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-09 02:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2023-03-09 02:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2023-03-09 02:40:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-09 02:40:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9569705159645267573.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9569705159645267573.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9569705159645267573.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9569705159645267573.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9569705159645267573.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-09 02:40:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-09 02:40:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-09 02:40:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 597 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-09 02:40:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
[2023-03-09 02:40:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 116 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-09 02:40:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability57091940663546207.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-09 02:40:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13154498563410233506.ctl : 12 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability57091940663546207.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13154498563410233506.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,259556,10.3389,190088,1954,791,255318,17015,221,1.30227e+06,126,153699,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(A(((((AF((((((((i0.u4.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_6>=1))||((i0.u4.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_7>=1)))||(((i0.u4.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i2.u...15947
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i0.u4.NB_ATTENT...40593
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t22, t23, t25, t56, t57, t92, t101, t191, t200, t235, t244, i1.u2.t11, i1.u2.t24, i2.t79,...262
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,73.429,966392,1,0,1.3485e+06,38709,1701,6.08441e+06,786,361874,1218016
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(AX((i1.u2.SUR_PONT_B>=1)) U (((((AF((((((AX((i1.u2.SUR_PONT_B>=1)) + ((i0.u0.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=1))) + (((i0.u0.ROUTE_...40239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((((!(EG(!((((((!(EX(!((i1.u2.SUR_PONT_B>=1)))) + ((i0.u0.ROUTE_A>=1)&&(i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_4>=...120774
(forward)formula 1,1,78.9704,998600,1,0,1.39761e+06,40175,3064,6.20427e+06,830,371468,1300790
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EX(EF(((((((((((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(i1.u3.ATTENTE_B>=1)))||(((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=1)&...27540
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((i1.u2.CAPACITE>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i1.u3.NB_ATTENTE_B_4>=1)&&(i1....51888
dead was empty
(forward)formula 2,1,114.185,1301940,1,0,1.83867e+06,44226,3300,7.75641e+06,869,411009,1772508
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF(EG((((((((i0.u4.CHOIX_2<1)||(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_6<1))&&((i0.u4.CHOIX_2<1)||(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_7<1)))&&(((i0.u4.CHOIX_2<1)||(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_4...16056
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(EG((((((((i0.u4.CHOIX_2<1)||(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_6<1))&&((i0.u4.CHOIX_2<1)||(i2.u1.COMP...16327
(forward)formula 3,1,148.526,1664412,1,0,2.29561e+06,48849,3424,9.76148e+06,872,454886,2177670
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AX(EG(((E(!(((((((((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_3>=1)&&(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_7>=1)))||(((i2.u5....37102
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(E(TRUE U ((((((((((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_1>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i...61517
(forward)formula 4,0,193.444,1913364,1,0,2.71672e+06,53107,3448,1.06057e+07,873,502735,2537324
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(AG(EX(((EG((((i1.u2.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i0.u4.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_10>=1)))) * EG((i1.u2.SUR_PONT_A>=1))) ...746
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((EG((((i1.u2.CHOIX_1>=1)&&(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_10>=1))||((i0.u4.CHOIX_2>=1)&&(i2...810
(forward)formula 5,0,193.717,1914948,1,0,2.72028e+06,53116,3456,1.06079e+07,873,502810,2540672
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((AX(!(E((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_8>=1))) U (((i0.u4.NB_ATTEN...751
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_6>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1...1188
(forward)formula 6,0,194.177,1915740,1,0,2.72067e+06,53137,3467,1.06087e+07,873,503136,2543138
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((AF(AG((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_10>=1)&&(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_10>=1))))) + ((AF(EX((((i0....306
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i2.u5.NB_ATTEN...413
(forward)formula 7,0,226.199,2107140,1,0,2.90342e+06,56705,3472,1.14641e+07,873,533086,2699877
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(E((AG(((A((((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_A_5>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_B_0>=1)&&(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_8>=1))) U (((i0.u0.NB_ATT...643
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((!(E(TRUE U !(((!((E(!((((i0.u0.NB_ATTENTE_A_9>=1)&&(i0.u4.CONTROLEUR_2>=1))&&((i0.u4.NB_ATTENTE_...947
dead was empty
(forward)formula 8,1,260.636,2183700,1,0,2.93961e+06,57088,3497,1.15717e+07,873,539378,2749083
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E((EX(EG((!((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_5>=1)))) + EX((((i0.u0.NB_...904
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,(EX(EG((!((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_9>=1)&&(i...975
(forward)formula 9,1,334.017,2220924,1,0,2.97031e+06,58031,595,1.16583e+07,399,546225,645923
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(EF(((!(E((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B_3>=1)&&(i2.u1.COMPTEUR_8>=1))) U (((i2.u5.NB_ATTE...593
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(E((((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_A_0>=1)&&(i2.u5.CONTROLEUR_1>=1))&&((i2.u5.NB_ATTENTE_B...653
(forward)formula 10,1,334.583,2220924,1,0,2.97031e+06,58031,799,1.16583e+07,480,546225,680126
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1069147 ms.

BK_STOP 1678329937351

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r037-tajo-167813690000170"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10.tgz
mv BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V10P10N10 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;