fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r522-tall-167987246800002
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of Marcie+red for Anderson-PT-04

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
5749.283 19491.00 25856.00 239.20 TTFFFFTTTTTTTFFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r522-tall-167987246800002.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool marciexred
Input is Anderson-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r522-tall-167987246800002
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 428K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Mar 23 15:19 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K Mar 23 15:19 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K Mar 23 15:19 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K Mar 23 15:19 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Mar 23 07:06 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Mar 23 07:06 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K Mar 23 07:06 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Mar 23 07:06 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Mar 26 22:42 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K Mar 23 15:20 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K Mar 23 15:20 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K Mar 23 15:20 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 32K Mar 23 15:20 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Mar 23 07:06 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Mar 23 07:06 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 26 22:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Mar 26 22:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 26 22:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 103K Mar 31 16:48 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1680839021824

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=marciexred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Anderson-PT-04
Applying reductions before tool marcie
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202304061127
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 48 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Transformed 105 places.
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Transformed 200 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 105 places and 200 transitions and 752 arcs in 108 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Support contains 56 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 99 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 99 transition count 194
Applied a total of 12 rules in 16 ms. Remains 99 /105 variables (removed 6) and now considering 194/200 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 99 cols
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 19 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 194 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 355 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 03:43:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 130 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/105 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 504 ms. Remains : 99/105 places, 194/200 transitions.
Support contains 56 out of 99 places after structural reductions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 382 ms. (steps per millisecond=26 ) properties (out of 71) seen :52
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 19) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 17) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 15) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 14) seen :3
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 11) seen :3
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 8) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 8 properties.
[2023-04-07 03:43:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 03:43:44] [INFO ] After 71ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:8
[2023-04-07 03:43:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 03:43:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 03:43:44] [INFO ] After 114ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :5
[2023-04-07 03:43:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 03:43:44] [INFO ] After 69ms SMT Verify possible using 12 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :5
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] After 179ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :5
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 70 ms.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] After 426ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :5
Fused 8 Parikh solutions to 5 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 21 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 99 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 99 transition count 182
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 87 transition count 182
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 75 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 75 transition count 134
Applied a total of 48 rules in 17 ms. Remains 75 /99 variables (removed 24) and now considering 134/194 (removed 60) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 17 ms. Remains : 75/99 places, 134/194 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 153 ms. (steps per millisecond=65 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 27 ms. (steps per millisecond=370 ) properties (out of 5) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=434 ) properties (out of 3) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=400 ) properties (out of 2) seen :1
Finished Best-First random walk after 4358 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=1089 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
Support contains 51 out of 99 places (down from 54) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 99 transition count 182
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 87 transition count 182
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 71 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 71 transition count 106
Applied a total of 56 rules in 11 ms. Remains 71 /99 variables (removed 28) and now considering 106/194 (removed 88) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11 ms. Remains : 71/99 places, 106/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 84 transition count 113
Applied a total of 30 rules in 5 ms. Remains 84 /99 variables (removed 15) and now considering 113/194 (removed 81) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 84/99 places, 113/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 84 transition count 125
Applied a total of 30 rules in 5 ms. Remains 84 /99 variables (removed 15) and now considering 125/194 (removed 69) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 84/99 places, 125/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 85 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 85 transition count 132
Applied a total of 28 rules in 5 ms. Remains 85 /99 variables (removed 14) and now considering 132/194 (removed 62) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 85/99 places, 132/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 82 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 82 transition count 111
Applied a total of 34 rules in 5 ms. Remains 82 /99 variables (removed 17) and now considering 111/194 (removed 83) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 82/99 places, 111/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 83 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 83 transition count 118
Applied a total of 32 rules in 4 ms. Remains 83 /99 variables (removed 16) and now considering 118/194 (removed 76) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 83/99 places, 118/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 84 transition count 125
Applied a total of 30 rules in 2 ms. Remains 84 /99 variables (removed 15) and now considering 125/194 (removed 69) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 84/99 places, 125/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 85 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 85 transition count 120
Applied a total of 28 rules in 2 ms. Remains 85 /99 variables (removed 14) and now considering 120/194 (removed 74) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 85/99 places, 120/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 83 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 83 transition count 118
Applied a total of 32 rules in 3 ms. Remains 83 /99 variables (removed 16) and now considering 118/194 (removed 76) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 83/99 places, 118/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 82 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 82 transition count 111
Applied a total of 34 rules in 2 ms. Remains 82 /99 variables (removed 17) and now considering 111/194 (removed 83) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 82/99 places, 111/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 90 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 90 transition count 155
Applied a total of 18 rules in 1 ms. Remains 90 /99 variables (removed 9) and now considering 155/194 (removed 39) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 90/99 places, 155/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 85 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 85 transition count 132
Applied a total of 28 rules in 6 ms. Remains 85 /99 variables (removed 14) and now considering 132/194 (removed 62) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 85/99 places, 132/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 99 transition count 182
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 87 transition count 182
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 71 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 71 transition count 106
Applied a total of 56 rules in 7 ms. Remains 71 /99 variables (removed 28) and now considering 106/194 (removed 88) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 71/99 places, 106/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 85 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 85 transition count 132
Applied a total of 28 rules in 2 ms. Remains 85 /99 variables (removed 14) and now considering 132/194 (removed 62) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 85/99 places, 132/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 85 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 85 transition count 132
Applied a total of 28 rules in 2 ms. Remains 85 /99 variables (removed 14) and now considering 132/194 (removed 62) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 85/99 places, 132/194 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 15 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 2 ms.
[2023-04-07 03:43:45] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 99 places, 194 transitions and 740 arcs took 1 ms.
Total runtime 2781 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
timeout --kill-after=10s --signal=SIGINT 1m for testing only

Marcie built on Linux at 2019-11-18.
A model checker for Generalized Stochastic Petri nets

authors: Alex Tovchigrechko (IDD package and CTL model checking)

Martin Schwarick (Symbolic numerical analysis and CSL model checking)

Christian Rohr (Simulative and approximative numerical model checking)

marcie@informatik.tu-cottbus.de

called as: /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../marcie/bin/marcie --net-file=model.pnml --mcc-file=CTLFireability.xml --memory=6 --mcc-mode

parse successfull
net created successfully

Net: Petri
(NrP: 99 NrTr: 194 NrArc: 740)

parse formulas
formulas created successfully
place and transition orderings generation:0m 0.002sec

net check time: 0m 0.000sec

init dd package: 0m 2.728sec


RS generation: 0m 0.810sec


-> reachability set: #nodes 12253 (1.2e+04) #states 24,568 (4)



starting MCC model checker
--------------------------

checking: E [EF [[[p27<=1 & 1<=p27] & [1<=p5 & p5<=1]]] U [[p7<=1 & 1<=p7] & [p28<=1 & 1<=p28]]]
normalized: E [E [true U [[p27<=1 & 1<=p27] & [1<=p5 & p5<=1]]] U [[p7<=1 & 1<=p7] & [p28<=1 & 1<=p28]]]

abstracting: (1<=p28)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p28<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 5,243 (3)
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p5<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 3,422 (3)
abstracting: (1<=p27)
states: 2,224 (3)
abstracting: (p27<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 1.281sec

checking: AX [AF [~ [E [AG [[[p6<=1 & 1<=p6] & [p17<=1 & 1<=p17]]] U ~ [[[p1<=1 & 1<=p1] & [p78<=1 & 1<=p78]]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [EX [EG [E [~ [E [true U ~ [[[p17<=1 & 1<=p17] & [p6<=1 & 1<=p6]]]]] U ~ [[[p78<=1 & 1<=p78] & [p1<=1 & 1<=p1]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 4,495 (3)
abstracting: (p1<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p78)
states: 384
abstracting: (p78<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 4,164 (3)
abstracting: (p6<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 2,314 (3)
abstracting: (p17<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.....................
EG iterations: 21
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.828sec

checking: EF [AG [~ [A [~ [AX [[[p10<=1 & 1<=p10] & [p13<=1 & 1<=p13]]]] U AG [[[p11<=1 & 1<=p11] & [p27<=1 & 1<=p27]]]]]]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [E [true U [~ [EG [E [true U ~ [[[p27<=1 & 1<=p27] & [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]]]]]] & ~ [E [E [true U ~ [[[p27<=1 & 1<=p27] & [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]]]] U [~ [EX [~ [[[p13<=1 & 1<=p13] & [p10<=1 & 1<=p10]]]]] & E [true U ~ [[[p27<=1 & 1<=p27] & [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 840
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p27)
states: 2,224 (3)
abstracting: (p27<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,836 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 2,433 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 840
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p27)
states: 2,224 (3)
abstracting: (p27<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 840
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p27)
states: 2,224 (3)
abstracting: (p27<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)

EG iterations: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.047sec

checking: AG [[EX [EF [[[p5<=1 & 1<=p5] & [p19<=1 & 1<=p19]]]] | [[p2<=1 & 1<=p2] & [p69<=1 & 1<=p69]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[[p69<=1 & 1<=p69] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]] | EX [E [true U [[p19<=1 & 1<=p19] & [p5<=1 & 1<=p5]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 3,422 (3)
abstracting: (p5<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 2,203 (3)
abstracting: (p19<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 324
abstracting: (p69<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.443sec

checking: AX [AF [[AG [[[p5<=0 & 0<=p5] | [p13<=0 & 0<=p13]]] & [EG [[[p6<=0 & 0<=p6] | [p27<=0 & 0<=p27]]] | AG [[[p10<=0 & 0<=p10] | [p16<=0 & 0<=p16]]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [EX [EG [~ [[[~ [E [true U ~ [[[p16<=0 & 0<=p16] | [p10<=0 & 0<=p10]]]]] | EG [[[p27<=0 & 0<=p27] | [p6<=0 & 0<=p6]]]] & ~ [E [true U ~ [[[p13<=0 & 0<=p13] | [p5<=0 & 0<=p5]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (0<=p5)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p5<=0)
states: 21,146 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p13)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p13<=0)
states: 22,135 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p6)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p6<=0)
states: 20,404 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p27)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p27<=0)
states: 22,344 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (0<=p10)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p10<=0)
states: 22,732 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p16)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p16<=0)
states: 22,031 (4)

EG iterations: 0
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 1.111sec

checking: EG [[[EX [[[p9<=1 & 1<=p9] & [p24<=1 & 1<=p24]]] | [p7<=0 & 0<=p7]] | [[p15<=0 & 0<=p15] | [[p4<=1 & 1<=p4] & [p79<=1 & 1<=p79]]]]]
normalized: EG [[[[[p79<=1 & 1<=p79] & [p4<=1 & 1<=p4]] | [p15<=0 & 0<=p15]] | [[p7<=0 & 0<=p7] | EX [[[p24<=1 & 1<=p24] & [p9<=1 & 1<=p9]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p24<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (0<=p7)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p7<=0)
states: 19,325 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p15)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p15<=0)
states: 22,290 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 4,983 (3)
abstracting: (p4<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 359
abstracting: (p79<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.......
EG iterations: 7
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.184sec

checking: AF [AG [E [[AG [[[p9<=1 & 1<=p9] & [p48<=1 & 1<=p48]]] | [~ [[[p9<=1 & 1<=p9] & [p22<=1 & 1<=p22]]] | AG [[[p12<=1 & 1<=p12] & [p32<=1 & 1<=p32]]]]] U EG [[[p5<=1 & 1<=p5] & [p18<=1 & 1<=p18]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [EG [E [true U ~ [E [[~ [E [true U ~ [[[p48<=1 & 1<=p48] & [p9<=1 & 1<=p9]]]]] | [~ [E [true U ~ [[[p32<=1 & 1<=p32] & [p12<=1 & 1<=p12]]]]] | ~ [[[p22<=1 & 1<=p22] & [p9<=1 & 1<=p9]]]]] U EG [[[p5<=1 & 1<=p5] & [p18<=1 & 1<=p18]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p18)
states: 2,239 (3)
abstracting: (p18<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 3,422 (3)
abstracting: (p5<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.............
EG iterations: 13
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 2,261 (3)
abstracting: (p22<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 192
abstracting: (p12<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p32)
states: 1,478 (3)
abstracting: (p32<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p48)
states: 1,364 (3)
abstracting: (p48<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)

EG iterations: 0
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.063sec

checking: EX [[AX [AF [E [[[p5<=1 & 1<=p5] & [p16<=1 & 1<=p16]] U [[p2<=1 & 1<=p2] & [p73<=1 & 1<=p73]]]]] & [EF [[[p11<=0 & 0<=p11] | [p20<=0 & 0<=p20]]] & [AX [EG [[[p6<=0 & 0<=p6] | [p13<=0 & 0<=p13]]]] | EF [[[p11<=1 & 1<=p11] & [p18<=1 & 1<=p18]]]]]]]
normalized: EX [[[[E [true U [[p18<=1 & 1<=p18] & [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]]] | ~ [EX [~ [EG [[[p13<=0 & 0<=p13] | [p6<=0 & 0<=p6]]]]]]] & E [true U [[p20<=0 & 0<=p20] | [p11<=0 & 0<=p11]]]] & ~ [EX [EG [~ [E [[[p16<=1 & 1<=p16] & [p5<=1 & 1<=p5]] U [[p73<=1 & 1<=p73] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 312
abstracting: (p73<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 3,422 (3)
abstracting: (p5<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 2,537 (3)
abstracting: (p16<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.....................
EG iterations: 21
.abstracting: (0<=p11)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p11<=0)
states: 23,728 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p20)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p20<=0)
states: 22,175 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p6)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p6<=0)
states: 20,404 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p13)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p13<=0)
states: 22,135 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
.abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 840
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p18)
states: 2,239 (3)
abstracting: (p18<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.988sec

checking: EG [[AF [EG [EF [[[p5<=1 & 1<=p5] & [p17<=1 & 1<=p17]]]]] | [[AF [[[[p9<=1 & 1<=p9] & [p17<=1 & 1<=p17]] | [[[p9<=1 & 1<=p9] & [p48<=1 & 1<=p48]] | [[p7<=1 & 1<=p7] & [p27<=1 & 1<=p27]]]]] & AX [1<=0]] & [[p9<=1 & 1<=p9] & [p20<=1 & 1<=p20]]]]]
normalized: EG [[~ [EG [~ [EG [E [true U [[p17<=1 & 1<=p17] & [p5<=1 & 1<=p5]]]]]]] | [[~ [EX [~ [1<=0]]] & ~ [EG [~ [[[[[p27<=1 & 1<=p27] & [p7<=1 & 1<=p7]] | [[p48<=1 & 1<=p48] & [p9<=1 & 1<=p9]]] | [[p17<=1 & 1<=p17] & [p9<=1 & 1<=p9]]]]]]] & [[p9<=1 & 1<=p9] & [p20<=1 & 1<=p20]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p20)
states: 2,393 (3)
abstracting: (p20<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 2,314 (3)
abstracting: (p17<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p48)
states: 1,364 (3)
abstracting: (p48<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 5,243 (3)
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p27)
states: 2,224 (3)
abstracting: (p27<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.......
EG iterations: 7
abstracting: (1<=0)
states: 0
.abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 3,422 (3)
abstracting: (p5<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 2,314 (3)
abstracting: (p17<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)

EG iterations: 0
.
EG iterations: 1

EG iterations: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.392sec

checking: [EX [A [~ [AF [E [[[p9<=1 & 1<=p9] & [p36<=1 & 1<=p36]] U [p38<=1 & 1<=p38]]]] U [EG [[[p11<=1 & 1<=p11] & [p13<=1 & 1<=p13]]] | [AX [[[p7<=1 & 1<=p7] & [p13<=1 & 1<=p13]]] & [[p4<=1 & 1<=p4] & [p71<=1 & 1<=p71]]]]]] | EF [[[[p4<=0 & 0<=p4] | [p59<=0 & 0<=p59]] & AG [[p49<=1 & 1<=p49]]]]]
normalized: [E [true U [~ [E [true U ~ [[p49<=1 & 1<=p49]]]] & [[p59<=0 & 0<=p59] | [p4<=0 & 0<=p4]]]] | EX [[~ [EG [~ [[[[[p71<=1 & 1<=p71] & [p4<=1 & 1<=p4]] & ~ [EX [~ [[[p13<=1 & 1<=p13] & [p7<=1 & 1<=p7]]]]]] | EG [[[p13<=1 & 1<=p13] & [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[[[[p71<=1 & 1<=p71] & [p4<=1 & 1<=p4]] & ~ [EX [~ [[[p13<=1 & 1<=p13] & [p7<=1 & 1<=p7]]]]]] | EG [[[p13<=1 & 1<=p13] & [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]]]]] U [~ [EG [~ [E [[[p36<=1 & 1<=p36] & [p9<=1 & 1<=p9]] U [p38<=1 & 1<=p38]]]]] & ~ [[[[[p71<=1 & 1<=p71] & [p4<=1 & 1<=p4]] & ~ [EX [~ [[[p13<=1 & 1<=p13] & [p7<=1 & 1<=p7]]]]]] | EG [[[p13<=1 & 1<=p13] & [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 840
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 2,433 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
....
EG iterations: 4
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 5,243 (3)
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 2,433 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 4,983 (3)
abstracting: (p4<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p71)
states: 390
abstracting: (p71<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p38)
states: 626
abstracting: (p38<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 1,396 (3)
abstracting: (p36<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 840
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 2,433 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
....
EG iterations: 4
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 5,243 (3)
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 2,433 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 4,983 (3)
abstracting: (p4<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p71)
states: 390
abstracting: (p71<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 840
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 2,433 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
....
EG iterations: 4
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 5,243 (3)
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 2,433 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 4,983 (3)
abstracting: (p4<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p71)
states: 390
abstracting: (p71<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)

EG iterations: 0
.abstracting: (0<=p4)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p4<=0)
states: 19,585 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p59)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p59<=0)
states: 23,196 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p49)
states: 1,119 (3)
abstracting: (p49<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.321sec

checking: [AG [~ [A [[AX [[[p10<=1 & 1<=p10] & [p27<=1 & 1<=p27]]] & AG [[[p11<=1 & 1<=p11] & [p13<=1 & 1<=p13]]]] U [[EG [[[p8<=1 & 1<=p8] & [p17<=1 & 1<=p17]]] | AG [[[p5<=1 & 1<=p5] & [p24<=1 & 1<=p24]]]] & [[p2<=1 & 1<=p2] & [p73<=1 & 1<=p73]]]]]] & EG [[[p12<=0 & 0<=p12] | [p32<=0 & 0<=p32]]]]
normalized: [EG [[[p32<=0 & 0<=p32] | [p12<=0 & 0<=p12]]] & ~ [E [true U [~ [EG [~ [[[[p73<=1 & 1<=p73] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]] & [~ [E [true U ~ [[[p24<=1 & 1<=p24] & [p5<=1 & 1<=p5]]]]] | EG [[[p17<=1 & 1<=p17] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[[[p73<=1 & 1<=p73] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]] & [~ [E [true U ~ [[[p24<=1 & 1<=p24] & [p5<=1 & 1<=p5]]]]] | EG [[[p17<=1 & 1<=p17] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]]] U [~ [[~ [E [true U ~ [[[p13<=1 & 1<=p13] & [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]]]]] & ~ [EX [~ [[[p27<=1 & 1<=p27] & [p10<=1 & 1<=p10]]]]]]] & ~ [[[[p73<=1 & 1<=p73] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]] & [~ [E [true U ~ [[[p24<=1 & 1<=p24] & [p5<=1 & 1<=p5]]]]] | EG [[[p17<=1 & 1<=p17] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 2,314 (3)
abstracting: (p17<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
..............
EG iterations: 14
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 3,422 (3)
abstracting: (p5<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p24<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 312
abstracting: (p73<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,836 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p27)
states: 2,224 (3)
abstracting: (p27<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 840
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 2,433 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 2,314 (3)
abstracting: (p17<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
..............
EG iterations: 14
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 3,422 (3)
abstracting: (p5<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p24<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 312
abstracting: (p73<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 2,314 (3)
abstracting: (p17<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
..............
EG iterations: 14
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 3,422 (3)
abstracting: (p5<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p24<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 312
abstracting: (p73<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)

EG iterations: 0
abstracting: (0<=p12)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p12<=0)
states: 24,376 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p32)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p32<=0)
states: 23,090 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.125sec

checking: E [~ [[[p7<=1 & 1<=p7] & [p20<=1 & 1<=p20]]] U [[~ [AF [[[p10<=1 & 1<=p10] & [p15<=1 & 1<=p15]]]] & [p10<=1 & 1<=p10]] & [[p19<=1 & 1<=p19] & [AG [AX [[[p9<=1 & 1<=p9] & [p13<=1 & 1<=p13]]]] | [~ [[[p8<=1 & 1<=p8] & [p15<=1 & 1<=p15]]] | [[p4<=1 & 1<=p4] & [p59<=1 & 1<=p59]]]]]]]
normalized: E [~ [[[p20<=1 & 1<=p20] & [p7<=1 & 1<=p7]]] U [[[[[[p59<=1 & 1<=p59] & [p4<=1 & 1<=p4]] | ~ [[[p15<=1 & 1<=p15] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]] | ~ [E [true U EX [~ [[[p13<=1 & 1<=p13] & [p9<=1 & 1<=p9]]]]]]] & [p19<=1 & 1<=p19]] & [[p10<=1 & 1<=p10] & EG [~ [[[p15<=1 & 1<=p15] & [p10<=1 & 1<=p10]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,836 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,278 (3)
abstracting: (p15<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,836 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 2,203 (3)
abstracting: (p19<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 2,433 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,278 (3)
abstracting: (p15<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 4,983 (3)
abstracting: (p4<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p59)
states: 1,372 (3)
abstracting: (p59<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 5,243 (3)
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p20)
states: 2,393 (3)
abstracting: (p20<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.501sec

checking: E [[[p2<=1 & 1<=p2] & [[p81<=1 & 1<=p81] & [~ [[AF [[[p8<=1 & 1<=p8] & [p28<=1 & 1<=p28]]] & AF [[[p10<=1 & 1<=p10] & [p19<=1 & 1<=p19]]]]] | ~ [[[p11<=1 & 1<=p11] & [p18<=1 & 1<=p18]]]]]] U [AX [AG [[[[p6<=1 & 1<=p6] & [p26<=1 & 1<=p26]] | [[p11<=1 & 1<=p11] & [p18<=1 & 1<=p18]]]]] | [[p1<=1 & 1<=p1] & [p82<=1 & 1<=p82]]]]
normalized: E [[[[~ [[[p18<=1 & 1<=p18] & [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]]] | ~ [[~ [EG [~ [[[p19<=1 & 1<=p19] & [p10<=1 & 1<=p10]]]]] & ~ [EG [~ [[[p28<=1 & 1<=p28] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]]]]] & [p81<=1 & 1<=p81]] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]] U [[[p82<=1 & 1<=p82] & [p1<=1 & 1<=p1]] | ~ [EX [E [true U ~ [[[[p18<=1 & 1<=p18] & [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]] | [[p26<=1 & 1<=p26] & [p6<=1 & 1<=p6]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 4,164 (3)
abstracting: (p6<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p26)
states: 2,261 (3)
abstracting: (p26<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 840
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p18)
states: 2,239 (3)
abstracting: (p18<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 4,495 (3)
abstracting: (p1<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p82)
states: 384
abstracting: (p82<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p81)
states: 320
abstracting: (p81<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p28)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p28<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
........
EG iterations: 8
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,836 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 2,203 (3)
abstracting: (p19<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 840
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p18)
states: 2,239 (3)
abstracting: (p18<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.192sec

checking: [EX [[[p1<=1 & 1<=p1] & [p62<=1 & 1<=p62]]] | EG [[[[EF [[p40<=1 & 1<=p40]] & [A [[[p7<=1 & 1<=p7] & [p26<=1 & 1<=p26]] U [[p2<=1 & 1<=p2] & [p57<=1 & 1<=p57]]] & [p0<=1 & 1<=p0]]] & [[p88<=1 & 1<=p88] & [[p9<=1 & 1<=p9] & [p26<=1 & 1<=p26]]]] | ~ [A [AF [[[p6<=1 & 1<=p6] & [p26<=1 & 1<=p26]]] U [A [[[p0<=1 & 1<=p0] & [p87<=1 & 1<=p87]] U [p47<=1 & 1<=p47]] & [[p7<=1 & 1<=p7] & [p15<=1 & 1<=p15]]]]]]]]
normalized: [EG [[~ [[~ [EG [~ [[[[p15<=1 & 1<=p15] & [p7<=1 & 1<=p7]] & [~ [EG [~ [[p47<=1 & 1<=p47]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[p47<=1 & 1<=p47]] U [~ [[[p87<=1 & 1<=p87] & [p0<=1 & 1<=p0]]] & ~ [[p47<=1 & 1<=p47]]]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[[[p15<=1 & 1<=p15] & [p7<=1 & 1<=p7]] & [~ [EG [~ [[p47<=1 & 1<=p47]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[p47<=1 & 1<=p47]] U [~ [[[p87<=1 & 1<=p87] & [p0<=1 & 1<=p0]]] & ~ [[p47<=1 & 1<=p47]]]]]]]] U [EG [~ [[[p26<=1 & 1<=p26] & [p6<=1 & 1<=p6]]]] & ~ [[[[p15<=1 & 1<=p15] & [p7<=1 & 1<=p7]] & [~ [EG [~ [[p47<=1 & 1<=p47]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[p47<=1 & 1<=p47]] U [~ [[[p87<=1 & 1<=p87] & [p0<=1 & 1<=p0]]] & ~ [[p47<=1 & 1<=p47]]]]]]]]]]]]] | [[[[p26<=1 & 1<=p26] & [p9<=1 & 1<=p9]] & [p88<=1 & 1<=p88]] & [[[p0<=1 & 1<=p0] & [~ [EG [~ [[[p57<=1 & 1<=p57] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[[p57<=1 & 1<=p57] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]] U [~ [[[p26<=1 & 1<=p26] & [p7<=1 & 1<=p7]]] & ~ [[[p57<=1 & 1<=p57] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]]]]] & E [true U [p40<=1 & 1<=p40]]]]]] | EX [[[p62<=1 & 1<=p62] & [p1<=1 & 1<=p1]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 4,495 (3)
abstracting: (p1<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p62)
states: 1,537 (3)
abstracting: (p62<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p40)
states: 1,145 (3)
abstracting: (p40<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p57)
states: 1,368 (3)
abstracting: (p57<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 5,243 (3)
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p26)
states: 2,261 (3)
abstracting: (p26<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p57)
states: 1,368 (3)
abstracting: (p57<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p57)
states: 1,368 (3)
abstracting: (p57<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
....................
EG iterations: 20
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,732 (3)
abstracting: (p0<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 340
abstracting: (p88<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p26)
states: 2,261 (3)
abstracting: (p26<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 1,301 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,732 (3)
abstracting: (p0<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p87)
states: 390
abstracting: (p87<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 1,301 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 1,301 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 5,243 (3)
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,278 (3)
abstracting: (p15<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 4,164 (3)
abstracting: (p6<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p26)
states: 2,261 (3)
abstracting: (p26<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.......
EG iterations: 7
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 1,301 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,732 (3)
abstracting: (p0<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p87)
states: 390
abstracting: (p87<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 1,301 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 1,301 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 5,243 (3)
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,278 (3)
abstracting: (p15<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 1,301 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 5,732 (3)
abstracting: (p0<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p87)
states: 390
abstracting: (p87<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 1,301 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 1,301 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 5,243 (3)
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 2,278 (3)
abstracting: (p15<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)

EG iterations: 0

EG iterations: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 1.013sec

checking: A [[A [~ [EF [[[[p3<=1 & 1<=p3] & [p52<=1 & 1<=p52]] | [[p6<=1 & 1<=p6] & [p26<=1 & 1<=p26]]]]] U [~ [A [[p37<=1 & 1<=p37] U [[p8<=1 & 1<=p8] & [p25<=1 & 1<=p25]]]] & AF [[[[p9<=1 & 1<=p9] & [p36<=1 & 1<=p36]] | [1<=p41 & p41<=1]]]]] & ~ [EG [[[p37<=1 & 1<=p37] & [[p7<=1 & 1<=p7] & [p14<=1 & 1<=p14]]]]]] U [E [[[EX [[[p2<=1 & 1<=p2] & [p73<=1 & 1<=p73]]] | [[p8<=1 & 1<=p8] & [p28<=1 & 1<=p28]]] & EX [[[p6<=1 & 1<=p6] & [p16<=1 & 1<=p16]]]] U ~ [AF [EG [[[p12<=1 & 1<=p12] & [p32<=1 & 1<=p32]]]]]] & AG [[~ [[AF [[[p2<=1 & 1<=p2] & [p77<=1 & 1<=p77]]] & [[[p10<=1 & 1<=p10] & [p23<=1 & 1<=p23]] | [[p10<=1 & 1<=p10] & [p24<=1 & 1<=p24]]]]] | EG [AG [[[p2<=1 & 1<=p2] & [p57<=1 & 1<=p57]]]]]]]]
normalized: [~ [EG [~ [[~ [E [true U ~ [[EG [~ [E [true U ~ [[[p57<=1 & 1<=p57] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]]] | ~ [[[[[p24<=1 & 1<=p24] & [p10<=1 & 1<=p10]] | [[p23<=1 & 1<=p23] & [p10<=1 & 1<=p10]]] & ~ [EG [~ [[[p77<=1 & 1<=p77] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]]]]]]]] & E [[EX [[[p16<=1 & 1<=p16] & [p6<=1 & 1<=p6]]] & [[[p28<=1 & 1<=p28] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]] | EX [[[p73<=1 & 1<=p73] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]] U EG [~ [EG [[[p32<=1 & 1<=p32] & [p12<=1 & 1<=p12]]]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[~ [E [true U ~ [[EG [~ [E [true U ~ [[[p57<=1 & 1<=p57] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]]] | ~ [[[[[p24<=1 & 1<=p24] & [p10<=1 & 1<=p10]] | [[p23<=1 & 1<=p23] & [p10<=1 & 1<=p10]]] & ~ [EG [~ [[[p77<=1 & 1<=p77] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]]]]]]]] & E [[EX [[[p16<=1 & 1<=p16] & [p6<=1 & 1<=p6]]] & [[[p28<=1 & 1<=p28] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]] | EX [[[p73<=1 & 1<=p73] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]] U EG [~ [EG [[[p32<=1 & 1<=p32] & [p12<=1 & 1<=p12]]]]]]]] U [~ [[~ [EG [[[[p14<=1 & 1<=p14] & [p7<=1 & 1<=p7]] & [p37<=1 & 1<=p37]]]] & [~ [EG [~ [[~ [EG [~ [[[1<=p41 & p41<=1] | [[p36<=1 & 1<=p36] & [p9<=1 & 1<=p9]]]]]] & ~ [[~ [EG [~ [[[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]] U [~ [[p37<=1 & 1<=p37]] & ~ [[[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[~ [EG [~ [[[1<=p41 & p41<=1] | [[p36<=1 & 1<=p36] & [p9<=1 & 1<=p9]]]]]] & ~ [[~ [EG [~ [[[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]] U [~ [[p37<=1 & 1<=p37]] & ~ [[[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]]]]]]] U [E [true U [[[p26<=1 & 1<=p26] & [p6<=1 & 1<=p6]] | [[p52<=1 & 1<=p52] & [p3<=1 & 1<=p3]]]] & ~ [[~ [EG [~ [[[1<=p41 & p41<=1] | [[p36<=1 & 1<=p36] & [p9<=1 & 1<=p9]]]]]] & ~ [[~ [EG [~ [[[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]] U [~ [[p37<=1 & 1<=p37]] & ~ [[[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] & ~ [[~ [E [true U ~ [[EG [~ [E [true U ~ [[[p57<=1 & 1<=p57] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]]] | ~ [[[[[p24<=1 & 1<=p24] & [p10<=1 & 1<=p10]] | [[p23<=1 & 1<=p23] & [p10<=1 & 1<=p10]]] & ~ [EG [~ [[[p77<=1 & 1<=p77] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]]]]]]]] & E [[EX [[[p16<=1 & 1<=p16] & [p6<=1 & 1<=p6]]] & [[[p28<=1 & 1<=p28] & [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]] | EX [[[p73<=1 & 1<=p73] & [p2<=1 & 1<=p2]]]]] U EG [~ [EG [[[p32<=1 & 1<=p32] & [p12<=1 & 1<=p12]]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 192
abstracting: (p12<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p32)
states: 1,478 (3)
abstracting: (p32<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.....
EG iterations: 5

EG iterations: 0
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 312
abstracting: (p73<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p28)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p28<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 4,164 (3)
abstracting: (p6<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 2,537 (3)
abstracting: (p16<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p77)
states: 320
abstracting: (p77<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.....................
EG iterations: 21
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,836 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 2,224 (3)
abstracting: (p23<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,836 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p24<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p57)
states: 1,368 (3)
abstracting: (p57<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,323 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 1,429 (3)
abstracting: (p37<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,323 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,323 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 1,396 (3)
abstracting: (p36<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p41<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 1,301 (3)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 4,833 (3)
abstracting: (p3<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p52)
states: 1,446 (3)
abstracting: (p52<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 4,164 (3)
abstracting: (p6<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p26)
states: 2,261 (3)
abstracting: (p26<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,323 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 1,429 (3)
abstracting: (p37<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,323 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,323 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 1,396 (3)
abstracting: (p36<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p41<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 1,301 (3)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,323 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 1,429 (3)
abstracting: (p37<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,323 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,323 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 2,734 (3)
abstracting: (p9<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 1,396 (3)
abstracting: (p36<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (p41<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 1,301 (3)
.
EG iterations: 1
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 1,429 (3)
abstracting: (p37<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 5,243 (3)
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 2,334 (3)
abstracting: (p14<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
......
EG iterations: 6
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 192
abstracting: (p12<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p32)
states: 1,478 (3)
abstracting: (p32<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.....
EG iterations: 5

EG iterations: 0
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 312
abstracting: (p73<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p28)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p28<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 4,164 (3)
abstracting: (p6<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 2,537 (3)
abstracting: (p16<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p77)
states: 320
abstracting: (p77<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.....................
EG iterations: 21
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,836 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 2,224 (3)
abstracting: (p23<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,836 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p24<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p57)
states: 1,368 (3)
abstracting: (p57<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 192
abstracting: (p12<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p32)
states: 1,478 (3)
abstracting: (p32<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.....
EG iterations: 5

EG iterations: 0
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 312
abstracting: (p73<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 6,137 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p28)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p28<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 4,164 (3)
abstracting: (p6<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 2,537 (3)
abstracting: (p16<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p77)
states: 320
abstracting: (p77<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.....................
EG iterations: 21
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,836 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 2,224 (3)
abstracting: (p23<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,836 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 2,387 (3)
abstracting: (p24<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 4,525 (3)
abstracting: (p2<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p57)
states: 1,368 (3)
abstracting: (p57<=1)
states: 24,568 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA Anderson-PT-04-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 1.168sec

totally nodes used: 4152765 (4.2e+06)
number of garbage collections: 0
fire ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 9072439 27086490 36158929
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 24970090 42138774 16 1024MB
basic ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 1431350 3470100 4901450
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 5084768 11692448 12 192MB
unary ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 8 128MB
abstract ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 12 192MB
state nr cache: hits/miss/sum: 19661 97747 117408
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 97201 8291407 32 256MB
max state cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 8388608 32 256MB
uniqueHash elements/entry size/size: 67108864 4 256MB
0 63492249
1 3162806
2 381656
3 63007
4 8196
5 861
6 86
7 3
8 0
9 0
>= 10 0

Total processing time: 0m14.336sec


BK_STOP 1680839041315

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202304061127.jar
+ VERSION=202304061127
+ echo 'Running Version 202304061127'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
check for maximal unmarked siphon
ok
check for constant places
ok
check if there are places and transitions
ok
check if there are transitions without pre-places
ok
check if at least one transition is enabled in m0
ok
check if there are transitions that can never fire
ok


initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:60073 (309), effective:1636 (8)

initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:20780 (107), effective:666 (3)

iterations count:17157 (88), effective:564 (2)

iterations count:1138 (5), effective:33 (0)

iterations count:194 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:518 (2), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:518 (2), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:518 (2), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:194 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:27621 (142), effective:903 (4)

iterations count:22925 (118), effective:717 (3)

iterations count:19462 (100), effective:610 (3)

iterations count:296 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:265 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:194 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:901 (4), effective:13 (0)

iterations count:520 (2), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:33408 (172), effective:1090 (5)

iterations count:29816 (153), effective:940 (4)

iterations count:194 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:34764 (179), effective:1123 (5)

iterations count:328 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:452 (2), effective:15 (0)

iterations count:521 (2), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:452 (2), effective:15 (0)

iterations count:194 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:452 (2), effective:15 (0)

iterations count:194 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:37937 (195), effective:1268 (6)

iterations count:1135 (5), effective:28 (0)

iterations count:194 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:14638 (75), effective:463 (2)

iterations count:1175 (6), effective:30 (0)

iterations count:299 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:299 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:1197 (6), effective:34 (0)

iterations count:299 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:194 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:222 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:310 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:12821 (66), effective:397 (2)

iterations count:310 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:194 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:310 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:194 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:222 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:194 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:222 (1), effective:1 (0)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Anderson-PT-04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="marciexred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool marciexred"
echo " Input is Anderson-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r522-tall-167987246800002"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Anderson-PT-04.tgz
mv Anderson-PT-04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;