Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r517-tall-167987243300026.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is Anderson-PT-07, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r517-tall-167987243300026
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 924K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K Mar 23 15:19 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K Mar 23 15:19 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K Mar 23 15:19 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K Mar 23 15:19 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Mar 23 07:06 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Mar 23 07:06 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.7K Mar 23 07:06 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Mar 23 07:06 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Mar 26 22:42 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Mar 23 15:20 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 107K Mar 23 15:20 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Mar 23 15:20 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K Mar 23 15:20 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Mar 23 07:06 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Mar 23 07:06 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 26 22:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Mar 26 22:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 26 22:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 461K Mar 31 16:48 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1680841882626

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Anderson-PT-07
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202304061127
[2023-04-07 04:31:24] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-04-07 04:31:24] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-04-07 04:31:24] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 89 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:24] [INFO ] Transformed 309 places.
[2023-04-07 04:31:24] [INFO ] Transformed 917 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:31:24] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2023-04-07 04:31:24] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 309 places and 917 transitions and 3500 arcs in 161 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Support contains 100 out of 309 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 917/917 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 278 transition count 850
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 278 transition count 850
Applied a total of 62 rules in 56 ms. Remains 278 /309 variables (removed 31) and now considering 850/917 (removed 67) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 850 rows 278 cols
[2023-04-07 04:31:24] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 35 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 346 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:31:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:31:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:31:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 703 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1074 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-04-07 04:31:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:31:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 480 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 278/309 places, 850/917 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1617 ms. Remains : 278/309 places, 850/917 transitions.
Support contains 100 out of 278 places after structural reductions.
[2023-04-07 04:31:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 107 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 850 transitions.
Support contains 99 out of 278 places (down from 100) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 519 ms. (steps per millisecond=19 ) properties (out of 91) seen :41
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 50) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 49) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 47) seen :3
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 44) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 44) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 44) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 44) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 44) seen :7
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 37) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 36) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 34) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=142 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 32) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 32) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 31) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 30) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 29) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 29 properties.
[2023-04-07 04:31:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:31:27] [INFO ] After 253ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:29
[2023-04-07 04:31:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:30] [INFO ] After 2046ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :24
[2023-04-07 04:31:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:31:32] [INFO ] After 2177ms SMT Verify possible using 42 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :24
[2023-04-07 04:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 175 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:34] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 248 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 154 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 149 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 140 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 154 places in 146 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 137 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 137 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:36] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 7/6 trap constraints in 1087 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:37] [INFO ] After 7478ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :24
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 1740 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:31:39] [INFO ] After 11615ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :24
Fused 29 Parikh solutions to 24 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 305 ms.
Support contains 42 out of 278 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Performed 38 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 38 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 278 transition count 812
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 240 transition count 812
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 213 transition count 581
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 213 transition count 581
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 210 transition count 578
Applied a total of 136 rules in 72 ms. Remains 210 /278 variables (removed 68) and now considering 578/850 (removed 272) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 72 ms. Remains : 210/278 places, 578/850 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 285 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties (out of 24) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 23) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 23) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 23) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 23) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 23) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 23) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 23) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 23) seen :3
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 20) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 19) seen :3
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 16 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 578 rows 210 cols
[2023-04-07 04:31:40] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 22 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:40] [INFO ] After 109ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:16
[2023-04-07 04:31:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:41] [INFO ] After 945ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :16
[2023-04-07 04:31:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:31:42] [INFO ] After 750ms SMT Verify possible using 42 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :16
[2023-04-07 04:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 109 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 102 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 99 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 108 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 99 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 103 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 104 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:43] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 8/7 trap constraints in 928 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 97 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 111 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 106 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:44] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 433 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:44] [INFO ] After 3063ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :16
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 940 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:31:45] [INFO ] After 5121ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :16
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 43 ms.
Support contains 29 out of 210 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 210/210 places, 578/578 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 204 transition count 500
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 204 transition count 500
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 202 transition count 498
Applied a total of 16 rules in 36 ms. Remains 202 /210 variables (removed 8) and now considering 498/578 (removed 80) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 36 ms. Remains : 202/210 places, 498/578 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 263 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 212857 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=70 ) properties seen :{1=1, 14=1}
Probabilistic random walk after 212857 steps, saw 127134 distinct states, run finished after 3003 ms. (steps per millisecond=70 ) properties seen :2
Running SMT prover for 14 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 498 rows 202 cols
[2023-04-07 04:31:48] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:49] [INFO ] After 83ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:14
[2023-04-07 04:31:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:49] [INFO ] After 618ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :14
[2023-04-07 04:31:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:31:50] [INFO ] After 550ms SMT Verify possible using 42 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :14
[2023-04-07 04:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 97 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 97 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 88 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 88 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 89 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 99 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-04-07 04:31:51] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 7/6 trap constraints in 698 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:51] [INFO ] After 1886ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :14
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 526 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:31:52] [INFO ] After 3187ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :14
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 97 ms.
Support contains 21 out of 202 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 202/202 places, 498/498 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 196 transition count 420
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 196 transition count 420
Applied a total of 12 rules in 15 ms. Remains 196 /202 variables (removed 6) and now considering 420/498 (removed 78) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 15 ms. Remains : 196/202 places, 420/498 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 161 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 86 ms. (steps per millisecond=116 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 111 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 77 ms. (steps per millisecond=129 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 72 ms. (steps per millisecond=138 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 109 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 106 ms. (steps per millisecond=94 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 111 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 117 ms. (steps per millisecond=85 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 106 ms. (steps per millisecond=94 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 57 ms. (steps per millisecond=175 ) properties (out of 12) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 109 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 110 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 243672 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=81 ) properties seen :{0=1, 1=1, 2=1, 4=1, 10=1}
Probabilistic random walk after 243672 steps, saw 146216 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=81 ) properties seen :5
Running SMT prover for 6 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 420 rows 196 cols
[2023-04-07 04:31:56] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 11 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:57] [INFO ] After 340ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:6
[2023-04-07 04:31:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:57] [INFO ] After 300ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
[2023-04-07 04:31:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:31:57] [INFO ] After 223ms SMT Verify possible using 42 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
[2023-04-07 04:31:57] [INFO ] After 485ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 230 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:31:58] [INFO ] After 1103ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 29 ms.
Support contains 12 out of 196 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 196/196 places, 420/420 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 192 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 192 transition count 368
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 189 transition count 365
Applied a total of 14 rules in 17 ms. Remains 189 /196 variables (removed 7) and now considering 365/420 (removed 55) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 18 ms. Remains : 189/196 places, 365/420 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 139 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 44 ms. (steps per millisecond=227 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 78 ms. (steps per millisecond=128 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 60 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 6) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 76 ms. (steps per millisecond=131 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 86 ms. (steps per millisecond=116 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 73 ms. (steps per millisecond=137 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 5 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 365 rows 189 cols
[2023-04-07 04:31:58] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:31:58] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:58] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:59] [INFO ] After 245ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:5
[2023-04-07 04:31:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:31:59] [INFO ] After 262ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :5
[2023-04-07 04:31:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:31:59] [INFO ] After 142ms SMT Verify possible using 42 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :5
[2023-04-07 04:31:59] [INFO ] After 305ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :5
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 136 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:31:59] [INFO ] After 788ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :5
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 32 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 189 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 189/189 places, 365/365 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 188 transition count 352
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 188 transition count 352
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 188 /189 variables (removed 1) and now considering 352/365 (removed 13) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 14 ms. Remains : 188/189 places, 352/365 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 162 ms. (steps per millisecond=61 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 46 ms. (steps per millisecond=217 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 58 ms. (steps per millisecond=172 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 76 ms. (steps per millisecond=131 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 74 ms. (steps per millisecond=135 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 67 ms. (steps per millisecond=149 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 533133 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=177 ) properties seen :{0=1, 1=1, 2=1, 3=1}
Probabilistic random walk after 533133 steps, saw 288327 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=177 ) properties seen :4
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 352 rows 188 cols
[2023-04-07 04:32:03] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 6 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:32:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:32:03] [INFO ] After 171ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
[2023-04-07 04:32:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:32:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2023-04-07 04:32:03] [INFO ] After 110ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2023-04-07 04:32:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:32:03] [INFO ] After 45ms SMT Verify possible using 42 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2023-04-07 04:32:03] [INFO ] After 72ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 22 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:32:03] [INFO ] After 270ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 188 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 188/188 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 184 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 184 transition count 300
Applied a total of 8 rules in 19 ms. Remains 184 /188 variables (removed 4) and now considering 300/352 (removed 52) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 19 ms. Remains : 184/188 places, 300/352 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=714 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=1250 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 291677 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 684 ms. (steps per millisecond=426 )
Probabilistic random walk after 291677 steps, saw 165757 distinct states, run finished after 684 ms. (steps per millisecond=426 ) properties seen :1
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2023-04-07 04:32:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 850 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 278 transition count 808
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 236 transition count 808
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 190 transition count 378
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 190 transition count 378
Applied a total of 176 rules in 23 ms. Remains 190 /278 variables (removed 88) and now considering 378/850 (removed 472) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 378 rows 190 cols
[2023-04-07 04:32:04] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:32:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 411 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 553 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 26 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 191 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 190/278 places, 378/850 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 799 ms. Remains : 190/278 places, 378/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 378 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9320430097586513998.gal : 13 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3579336022626618367.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9320430097586513998.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3579336022626618367.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14584126464500132110.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14584126464500132110.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14584126464500132110.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14584126464500132110.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14584126464500132110.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:32:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:32:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:32:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 427 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:32:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 132 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 148 labels/synchronizations in 24 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:32:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2606617923660806593.gal : 10 ms
[2023-04-07 04:32:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3060506226735420836.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2606617923660806593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3060506226735420836.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.17738e+06,9.87445,226708,4970,14023,297159,105346,779,690144,632,401812,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF((((i1.u3.next_8==0)||(i1.u3.ncs_4_5==0)) * AF(((i1.u3.next_10==0)||(i1.u4.ncs_4_0==0))))) + (i1.u4.next_12==0)) + ((i2.u1.ncs_3_4...430
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(TRUE U (((i1.u3.next_8==0)||(i1.u3.ncs_4_5==0)) * !(EG(!(((i1.u3.next_10==0)||...897
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t287, t291, t292, t293, t301, t302, t307, t309, t310, t312, t314, t315, t319, t320, t322, t32...363
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 237 transition count 449
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 237 transition count 449
Applied a total of 82 rules in 17 ms. Remains 237 /278 variables (removed 41) and now considering 449/850 (removed 401) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 449 rows 237 cols
[2023-04-07 04:33:06] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:33:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:33:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:33:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:33:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 743 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 891 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-04-07 04:33:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:33:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 282 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/278 places, 449/850 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1206 ms. Remains : 237/278 places, 449/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:33:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2023-04-07 04:33:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2023-04-07 04:33:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 449 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:33:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-04-07 04:33:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2023-04-07 04:33:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1077981963878128345.gal : 19 ms
[2023-04-07 04:33:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8458576550927061395.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1077981963878128345.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8458576550927061395.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:33:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2023-04-07 04:33:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:33:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16487168559635016932.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16487168559635016932.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16487168559635016932.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16487168559635016932.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16487168559635016932.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:33:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:33:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:33:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 731 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:33:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2023-04-07 04:33:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 51 labels/synchronizations in 28 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:33:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11344294824392115473.gal : 10 ms
[2023-04-07 04:33:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17124549975339146824.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11344294824392115473.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17124549975339146824.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.16256e+07,14.5268,315076,14910,8030,543762,22364,1019,492547,544,27938,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 235 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 235 transition count 435
Applied a total of 86 rules in 8 ms. Remains 235 /278 variables (removed 43) and now considering 435/850 (removed 415) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 435 rows 235 cols
[2023-04-07 04:34:08] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:34:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:34:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:34:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:34:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 547 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 799 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-04-07 04:34:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:34:09] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 233 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 235/278 places, 435/850 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1063 ms. Remains : 235/278 places, 435/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:34:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-04-07 04:34:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-04-07 04:34:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 435 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:34:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-04-07 04:34:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-04-07 04:34:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8051818869476709342.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:34:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11601985975747057203.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8051818869476709342.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11601985975747057203.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:34:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2023-04-07 04:34:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:34:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2831622804644855804.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2831622804644855804.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2831622804644855804.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2831622804644855804.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2831622804644855804.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:34:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:34:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:34:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 689 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:34:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2023-04-07 04:34:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 32 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:34:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability997444899387423377.gal : 4 ms
[2023-04-07 04:34:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9582093587836069461.ctl : 43 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability997444899387423377.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9582093587836069461.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.81254e+07,21.5039,420748,15323,10714,680607,62075,885,603983,592,1.2014e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 278 transition count 808
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 236 transition count 808
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 188 transition count 352
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 188 transition count 352
Applied a total of 180 rules in 22 ms. Remains 188 /278 variables (removed 90) and now considering 352/850 (removed 498) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 352 rows 188 cols
[2023-04-07 04:35:09] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 311 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 440 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 765 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 176 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/278 places, 352/850 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 977 ms. Remains : 188/278 places, 352/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 352 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3001367418185109008.gal : 17 ms
[2023-04-07 04:35:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5019522793948160428.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3001367418185109008.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5019522793948160428.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-04-07 04:35:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6996732572070007072.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6996732572070007072.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6996732572070007072.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6996732572070007072.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6996732572070007072.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:35:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:35:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:35:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 507 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2023-04-07 04:35:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 93 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1024278559304437772.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17433572565653290430.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1024278559304437772.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17433572565653290430.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,960672,4.36766,129996,7452,8888,222792,45431,758,140128,488,136485,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((AF(!(((i2.u5.next_10==1)&&(i6.u19.ncs_0_0==1)))) * (i2.u5.next_10==1)) * ((u7.ncs_1_0==1)&&(u0.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.F==1))) * (u0.cs_3_5...360
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((!(EG(!(!(((i2.u5.next_10==1)&&(i6.u19.ncs_0_0==1)))))) * (i2.u5.next_10==1)) * ((u7.ncs_1_0==1)&&...436
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t261, t262, t263, t264, t267, t268, t269, t270, t271, t272, t274, t275, t278, t279, t280, t28...393
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 228 transition count 356
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 228 transition count 356
Applied a total of 100 rules in 14 ms. Remains 228 /278 variables (removed 50) and now considering 356/850 (removed 494) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 356 rows 228 cols
[2023-04-07 04:36:11] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 179 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/278 places, 356/850 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 227 /227 variables (removed 0) and now considering 356/356 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 195 ms. Remains : 227/278 places, 356/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 356 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11697804731918477951.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7529913845209428599.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11697804731918477951.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7529913845209428599.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.77175e+07,13.1307,370808,2,113966,5,1.12064e+06,6,0,1267,1.20992e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:36:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:36:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2066110305484457395.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2066110305484457395.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2066110305484457395.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2066110305484457395.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2066110305484457395.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:36:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:36:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:36:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 565 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:36:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 5 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:36:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2067205182386138306.gal : 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2517959988793132424.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2067205182386138306.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2517959988793132424.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.77175e+07,2.36292,72572,12031,28,136105,212,1001,90575,40,389,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((i2.u11.p1_2_0==0) + EX(((i0.i1.u0.next_2==0)||(i1.u5.ncs_0_1==0)))) + EX(((i0.i1.u2.next_6==0)||(i0.i1.u49.ncs_4_1==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((i0.i1.u2.next_6==0)||(i0.i1.u49.ncs_4_1==0))))) * !((i2.u11.p1_2_0==0))) * !(EX(((i...206
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t307, t308, t309, t310, t311, t312, t313, t316, t317, t318, t319, t320, t321, t322, t323, t32...763
(forward)formula 0,1,13.4596,414952,1,0,716155,261,4462,1.13982e+06,170,1099,4004031
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 278 transition count 808
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 236 transition count 808
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 189 transition count 365
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 189 transition count 365
Applied a total of 178 rules in 21 ms. Remains 189 /278 variables (removed 89) and now considering 365/850 (removed 485) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 365 rows 189 cols
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 146 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/278 places, 365/850 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 29 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 29 transitions
Performed 29 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 29
Iterating post reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 188 transition count 336
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 159 transition count 329
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 152 transition count 329
Applied a total of 72 rules in 9 ms. Remains 152 /188 variables (removed 36) and now considering 329/365 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 329 rows 152 cols
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 4 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 329 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 439 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 152/278 places, 329/850 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 616 ms. Remains : 152/278 places, 329/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 329 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15852108187381879478.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:36:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2127512892711493813.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15852108187381879478.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2127512892711493813.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,815168,8.5999,273776,2,44995,5,702023,6,0,940,534089,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-04-07 04:37:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:37:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3248886288087010032.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3248886288087010032.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3248886288087010032.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3248886288087010032.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3248886288087010032.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:37:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:37:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:37:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 494 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:37:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2023-04-07 04:37:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 174 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:37:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17062031840247492227.gal : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 04:37:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14590566227708736348.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17062031840247492227.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14590566227708736348.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,815168,2.55636,85176,7492,271,173846,2219,835,137601,168,31536,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AG((((((i3.u5.next_6==1)&&(i4.u6.ncs_5_6==1))||(i6.u0.slot_F.F.F.F.F.T.F==0))||(i1.u31.p3_4_5==0)) * EF(((i2.u4.next_4==0)||(i4.u6.nc...361
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (!(!((E(!(((i3.u5.next_6==1)&&(i8.u35.ncs_2_3==1))) U (!(((i4.u3.next_0==1...1119
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t230, t231, t232, t233, t234, t236, t238, t239, t242, t243, t248, t249, t250, t251, t252, t25...456
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,20.4021,535836,1,0,975767,31799,3947,869141,748,241789,4160336
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 230 transition count 370
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 230 transition count 370
Applied a total of 96 rules in 9 ms. Remains 230 /278 variables (removed 48) and now considering 370/850 (removed 480) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 370 rows 230 cols
[2023-04-07 04:37:46] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:37:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 244 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 247 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/278 places, 370/850 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 229 /229 variables (removed 0) and now considering 370/370 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 259 ms. Remains : 229/278 places, 370/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:37:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:37:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:37:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 370 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:37:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:37:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-04-07 04:37:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16222176637079853342.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:37:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8568733504864576119.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16222176637079853342.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8568733504864576119.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97571e+07,14.1508,404848,2,98246,5,1.16799e+06,6,0,1289,1.1598e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:38:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:38:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:38:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15498856439824100801.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15498856439824100801.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15498856439824100801.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15498856439824100801.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15498856439824100801.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:38:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:38:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:38:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 619 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:38:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-04-07 04:38:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:38:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15907056968542181607.gal : 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:38:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9304681586159784329.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15907056968542181607.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9304681586159784329.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.97571e+07,4.94842,131460,13199,41,288087,376,1023,212695,53,730,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EG(AG(AF(((i0.i0.u5.next_12==0)||(i0.i0.u94.ncs_5_6==0)))))) + !(A((((i8.u22.p1_4_9==1)&&(i0.i0.u1.next_3==1))&&(i0.i1.u77.ncs_5_2==1...243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.i1.u54.p1_5_8==1) * EX(((i0.i0.u2.next_6==1)&&(i4.u29.ncs_0_3==1))))))) ...518
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t153, t154, t155, t156, t157, t321, t322, t323, t324, t325, t326, t327, t328, t329, t330, t33...838
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,23.8472,622920,1,0,1.13069e+06,559,5357,1.76539e+06,258,3205,5309221
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 238 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 238 transition count 438
Applied a total of 80 rules in 5 ms. Remains 238 /278 variables (removed 40) and now considering 438/850 (removed 412) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 438 rows 238 cols
[2023-04-07 04:38:41] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 7 ms
[2023-04-07 04:38:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:38:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:38:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:38:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 728 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 863 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-04-07 04:38:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:38:42] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 212 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/278 places, 438/850 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1083 ms. Remains : 238/278 places, 438/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:38:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-04-07 04:38:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-04-07 04:38:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 438 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:38:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-04-07 04:38:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-04-07 04:38:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13452758762886534187.gal : 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:38:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2614502463376151237.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13452758762886534187.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2614502463376151237.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-04-07 04:39:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6219651088014968608.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6219651088014968608.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6219651088014968608.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6219651088014968608.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6219651088014968608.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:39:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:39:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:39:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 703 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2023-04-07 04:39:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 31 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:39:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18325769522192666422.gal : 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:39:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16444888130405514920.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18325769522192666422.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16444888130405514920.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 278 transition count 809
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 237 transition count 809
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 188 transition count 328
Iterating global reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 188 transition count 328
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 187 transition count 327
Applied a total of 182 rules in 21 ms. Remains 187 /278 variables (removed 91) and now considering 327/850 (removed 523) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 327 rows 187 cols
[2023-04-07 04:39:42] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:39:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 152 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 156 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/278 places, 327/850 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 186 transition count 281
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 140 transition count 281
Applied a total of 92 rules in 6 ms. Remains 140 /186 variables (removed 46) and now considering 281/327 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 281 rows 140 cols
[2023-04-07 04:39:42] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2023-04-07 04:39:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:39:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:39:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:39:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 259 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 384 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 140/278 places, 281/850 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 567 ms. Remains : 140/278 places, 281/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 04:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 04:39:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 281 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 04:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 04:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15502943510359845341.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4259698927989719093.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15502943510359845341.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4259698927989719093.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,554211,6.15928,156608,2,38964,5,428377,6,0,844,301385,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15535291719745076858.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15535291719745076858.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15535291719745076858.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15535291719745076858.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15535291719745076858.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:40:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:40:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:40:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 446 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 83 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18068299750246119394.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14118004493980075464.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18068299750246119394.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14118004493980075464.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,554211,1.5551,52300,5968,227,83027,1713,765,105345,152,23393,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EF(AG(((i4.u4.next_5!=1)||(i4.u4.ncs_4_0!=1)))) * EG((E((i2.u21.p1_3_9==1) U ((i3.u5.next_6==1)&&(i4.u4.ncs_4_1==1))) + ((i4.u7.next_...183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((i4.u4.next_5!=1)||(i4.u4.ncs_4_0!=1)))))) * EG((E((i2.u21.p1_3_9==1) U ((i...246
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t193, t194, t195, t196, t197, t198, t199, t200, t201, t202, t203, t204, t205, t206, t207, t20...477
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,0,12.246,318248,1,0,529616,15102,3711,754587,618,119971,2305281
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 230 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 230 transition count 394
Applied a total of 96 rules in 5 ms. Remains 230 /278 variables (removed 48) and now considering 394/850 (removed 456) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 394 rows 230 cols
[2023-04-07 04:40:25] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 157 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/278 places, 394/850 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 229 /229 variables (removed 0) and now considering 394/394 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 165 ms. Remains : 229/278 places, 394/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 394 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17568193990490945762.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13697293511562335284.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17568193990490945762.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13697293511562335284.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.07406e+07,12.4539,371764,2,109296,5,1.16681e+06,6,0,1313,1.09131e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((next_1==1)&&(ncs_3_4==1)) U EG(((!(((AX(((next_5==1)&&(ncs_0_0==1))) + ((next_12==1)&&(ncs_0_5==1))) + ((next_5==1)&&(ncs_0_5==1)))) ...350
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,((next_1==1)&&(ncs_3_4==1))),((!(((!(EX(!(((next_5==1)&&(ncs_0_0==1))))) + ((next_12==1)&&(ncs_0...400
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 351/41/43
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:40:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:40:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9903064303443727216.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9903064303443727216.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9903064303443727216.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9903064303443727216.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9903064303443727216.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:40:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:40:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:40:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 706 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:40:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:40:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4280125162580977324.gal : 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:40:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1087938390990144378.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4280125162580977324.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1087938390990144378.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.07406e+07,4.39303,131452,13296,27,258512,175,977,164066,36,335,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((i0.i0.u0.next_1==1)&&(i10.u75.ncs_3_4==1)) U EG(((!(((AX(((i0.i1.u2.next_5==1)&&(i1.u60.ncs_0_0==1))) + ((i0.i2.u5.next_12==1)&&(i1.u...496
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,((i0.i0.u0.next_1==1)&&(i10.u75.ncs_3_4==1))),((!(((!(EX(!(((i0.i1.u2.next_5==1)&&(i1.u60.ncs_0_...546
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t345, t346, t347, t348, t349, t350, t351, t352, t353, t354, t355, t356, t357, t358, t359, t36...459
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 278 transition count 808
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 236 transition count 808
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 185 transition count 313
Iterating global reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 185 transition count 313
Applied a total of 186 rules in 12 ms. Remains 185 /278 variables (removed 93) and now considering 313/850 (removed 537) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 313 rows 185 cols
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 149 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/278 places, 313/850 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 47 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 47 transitions
Performed 47 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 47
Iterating post reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 184 transition count 266
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 137 transition count 266
Applied a total of 94 rules in 6 ms. Remains 137 /184 variables (removed 47) and now considering 266/313 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 266 rows 137 cols
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 263 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 379 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 137/278 places, 266/850 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 547 ms. Remains : 137/278 places, 266/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4483119986970517771.gal : 1 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3518054675022986272.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4483119986970517771.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3518054675022986272.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,445958,3.3126,117596,2,34731,5,328166,6,0,817,243903,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((next_2==1)&&(ncs_0_6==1))) + AG(((next_3==1)&&(ncs_6_2==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(((next_2==1)&&(ncs_0_6==1))))))),TRUE) * !(((next_3==1)&&(ncs_6_2==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t173, t174, t175, t176, t177, t178, t180, t181, t182, t183, t184, t185, t186, t187, t188, t18...456
(forward)formula 0,0,23.2603,653584,1,0,559,2.81005e+06,558,273,7096,1.34782e+06,546
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 228 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 228 transition count 368
Applied a total of 100 rules in 7 ms. Remains 228 /278 variables (removed 50) and now considering 368/850 (removed 482) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 228 cols
[2023-04-07 04:41:50] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 178 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/278 places, 368/850 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 227 /227 variables (removed 0) and now considering 368/368 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 187 ms. Remains : 227/278 places, 368/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:41:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 368 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:41:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3870750233389085209.gal : 14 ms
[2023-04-07 04:41:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10103352808476369455.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3870750233389085209.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10103352808476369455.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82588e+07,11.8262,343784,2,103172,5,1.0561e+06,6,0,1279,1.01182e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-04-07 04:42:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13015039260785197641.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13015039260785197641.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13015039260785197641.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13015039260785197641.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13015039260785197641.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:42:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:42:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:42:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 620 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-04-07 04:42:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 11 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:42:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13795265806941523260.gal : 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:42:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9510607274779696327.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13795265806941523260.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9510607274779696327.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82588e+07,6.20404,135436,11828,24,287982,185,990,219978,37,347,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((EX(((i7.i0.u65.slot_F.T.F.F.F.F.F==0)||(i3.u28.p2_6_1==0))) + !(A(((i0.i1.u1.next_4==1)&&(i1.u6.ncs_0_6==1)) U ((i0.i0.u0.next_2=...296
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((EX(((i7.i0.u65.slot_F.T.F.F.F.F.F==0)||(i3.u28.p2_6_1==0))) + !(!((E(!(((i0.i0.u0.nex...465
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t319, t320, t321, t322, t323, t324, t325, t328, t329, t330, t331, t332, t333, t334, t335, t33...462
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,1,26.1684,527880,1,0,944692,252,5642,1.20656e+06,178,1005,4820626
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 278 transition count 809
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 237 transition count 809
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 189 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 189 transition count 341
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 188 transition count 340
Applied a total of 180 rules in 15 ms. Remains 188 /278 variables (removed 90) and now considering 340/850 (removed 510) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 188 cols
[2023-04-07 04:42:46] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 6 ms
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 162 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/278 places, 340/850 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 45 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 45 transitions
Performed 45 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 45
Iterating post reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 187 transition count 295
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 142 transition count 295
Applied a total of 90 rules in 5 ms. Remains 142 /187 variables (removed 45) and now considering 295/340 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 295 rows 142 cols
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 314 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 417 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 142/278 places, 295/850 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 601 ms. Remains : 142/278 places, 295/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 295 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11777182461846808459.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:42:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3278018512523133344.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11777182461846808459.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3278018512523133344.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,640884,6.42965,163452,2,41438,5,461319,6,0,866,317355,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(E(((next_3==1)&&(ncs_3_0==1)) U (E((p1_5_5==1) U ((next_7==1)&&(p1_4_6==1))) * (((next_7==1)&&(ncs_0_6==1))||((next_2==1)&&(ncs_6_4...200
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((next_2==1)&&(ncs_6_0==1))))),((next_3==1)&&(ncs_3_0==1))) * (((next...259
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t148, t155, t162, t169, t176, t190, t191, t200, t201, t202, t203, t204, t205, t207, t208, t20...498
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:43:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:43:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4617062457657850240.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4617062457657850240.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4617062457657850240.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4617062457657850240.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4617062457657850240.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:43:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:43:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:43:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 489 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:43:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 108 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:43:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13533829106776029667.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18015482354801093067.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13533829106776029667.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18015482354801093067.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,640884,2.38391,67740,5382,288,132738,2063,794,109241,167,22097,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(E(((i3.u4.next_3==1)&&(i8.u37.ncs_3_0==1)) U (E((i5.u17.p1_5_5==1) U ((i1.u6.next_7==1)&&(i1.u23.p1_4_6==1))) * (((i1.u6.next_7==1)...270
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((i3.u4.next_2==1)&&(i3.u4.ncs_6_0==1))))),((i3.u4.next_3==1)&&(i8.u3...329
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t176, t200, t204, t205, t207, t208, t209, t210, t211, t212, t213, t214, t215, t216, t217, t21...502
(forward)formula 0,1,11.0335,246892,1,0,421208,24694,3201,460873,678,161435,1820528
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 232 transition count 408
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 232 transition count 408
Applied a total of 92 rules in 5 ms. Remains 232 /278 variables (removed 46) and now considering 408/850 (removed 442) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 408 rows 232 cols
[2023-04-07 04:43:28] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned []
[2023-04-07 04:43:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:43:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2023-04-07 04:43:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 661 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 812 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-04-07 04:43:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-04-07 04:43:29] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 210 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/278 places, 408/850 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1028 ms. Remains : 232/278 places, 408/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:43:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 408 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:43:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5268836397718742639.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability926424081962566477.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5268836397718742639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability926424081962566477.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12392087791448770063.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12392087791448770063.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12392087791448770063.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12392087791448770063.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12392087791448770063.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:43:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:43:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:43:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 640 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 59 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:43:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13014878205540113179.gal : 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:43:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11345818485244070560.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13014878205540113179.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11345818485244070560.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.38374e+07,14.2509,272424,9881,4636,506205,24358,1006,369220,500,33233,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 850/850 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 228 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 228 transition count 368
Applied a total of 100 rules in 8 ms. Remains 228 /278 variables (removed 50) and now considering 368/850 (removed 482) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 228 cols
[2023-04-07 04:44:30] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:44:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 149 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/278 places, 368/850 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 227 /227 variables (removed 0) and now considering 368/368 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 162 ms. Remains : 227/278 places, 368/850 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:44:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-04-07 04:44:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:44:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 368 transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:44:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:44:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-04-07 04:44:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15388256136019285249.gal : 2 ms
[2023-04-07 04:44:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3243925576402534411.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15388256136019285249.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3243925576402534411.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83563e+07,12.3571,309552,2,74079,5,865672,6,0,1279,724983,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 04:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-04-07 04:45:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1095415050551082904.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1095415050551082904.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1095415050551082904.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1095415050551082904.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1095415050551082904.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:45:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:45:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:45:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 625 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-04-07 04:45:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:45:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2868211112196815733.gal : 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:45:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13240964178855101083.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2868211112196815733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13240964178855101083.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83563e+07,2.23949,69716,9663,25,139490,223,995,91285,36,357,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EF((((i0.u3.next_7==1)&&(i9.u78.ncs_1_6==1))||((i0.u2.next_4==1)&&(i4.u17.ncs_5_0==1)))) + EG((AX(EF(((i0.u5.next_10==1)&&(i1.u7.ncs_...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG((!(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((i0.u5.next_10==1)&&(i1.u7.ncs_0_1==1)))))) * ((i0.u4.next_9==0)||(i0.u33.p...279
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t319, t320, t321, t322, t323, t324, t325, t326, t327, t328, t329, t330, t331, t332, t333, t33...462
(forward)formula 0,1,16.7473,407480,1,0,720738,259,5058,683008,169,1150,4275127
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2023-04-07 04:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2023-04-07 04:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2023-04-07 04:45:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 04:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5346576561051170436.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5346576561051170436.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5346576561051170436.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5346576561051170436.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5346576561051170436.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-04-07 04:45:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 04:45:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 04:45:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1188 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 04:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2023-04-07 04:45:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 566 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2023-04-07 04:45:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7068351329290478497.gal : 3 ms
[2023-04-07 04:45:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability322005600630330280.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7068351329290478497.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability322005600630330280.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-04-07 05:09:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-04-07 05:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2023-04-07 05:09:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-04-07 05:09:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-04-07 05:09:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 977 redundant transitions.
[2023-04-07 05:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 66 ms
[2023-04-07 05:09:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 423 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2023-04-07 05:09:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5138773992518653927.gal : 3 ms
[2023-04-07 05:09:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16459913733103318047.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5138773992518653927.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16459913733103318047.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.04977e+08,24.6534,491528,13888,6390,685806,9421,733,1.08e+06,624,430353,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF((((u8.next_8==0)||(u1.ncs_4_5==0)) * AF(((u8.next_10==0)||(u1.ncs_4_0==0))))) + (u8.next_12==0)) + ((u7.ncs_3_4==0) + ((AG(((u8.n...384
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(TRUE U (((u8.next_8==0)||(u1.ncs_4_5==0)) * !(EG(!(((u8.next_10==0)||(u1.ncs_4...815
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t16, t17, t23, t27, t28, t35, t37, t39, t46, t47, t58, t70, t107, t108, t109, t114, t117, t11...1219
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,51.9623,779972,1,0,809618,783488,3374,1.10873e+06,2684,4.35388e+06,3960220
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EX(EF(((((u4.p1_0_11==1) + E((u5.p1_1_1==1) U ((u9.slot_F.F.F.F.F.T.F==1)&&(u1.p3_4_5==1)))) + A(((u9.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.F==1)&&(u2.cs_5_4...595
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (((u4.p1_0_11==1) + E((u5.p1_1_1==1) U ((u9.slot_F.F.F.F.F.T.F==1)&&(u1.p3_4_5==1)))...1201
(forward)formula 1,1,76.8078,1329044,1,0,1.56239e+06,797884,3970,2.36184e+06,2786,4.59503e+06,8000589
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(((EX(EG(!(((u8.next_12==1)&&(u7.p1_3_6==1))))) + !(((u8.next_7==1)&&(u2.ncs_5_2==1)))) + (((u8.next_4==1)&&(u2.ncs_5_3==1))&&(!((u1.p1_...481
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((EX(((u8.next_4==1)&&(u1.ncs_4_0==1))) * !(E(TRUE U ((u9.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.F==1)&&(u3.cs_6_0==...1158
(forward)formula 2,0,102.39,1960200,1,0,2.51179e+06,805569,4031,3.61764e+06,2793,4.61236e+06,12369928
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E((((AF(!(((u8.next_10==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_0==1)))) * (u8.next_10==1)) * ((u5.ncs_1_0==1)&&(u9.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.F==1))) * (u7.cs_3_5==1)) U AF...329
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((!(EG(!(!(((u8.next_10==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_0==1)))))) * (u8.next_10==1)) * ((u5.ncs_1_0==1)&&(u9.slot_F...405
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 3,1,152.614,2204352,1,0,2.83716e+06,817487,1982,4.03994e+06,1689,4.63919e+06,5727294
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (A(((EF(((u4.p1_0_8==1)||(u1.p1_4_3==1))) + (u3.p1_6_0==1)) + ((u8.next_1==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_2==1))) U !((EG(!(((u8.next_2==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_6==...487
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(!((E(!(!((EG(!(((u8.next_2==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_6==1)))) + (u7.p1_3_0==1)))) U (!(((E(TRUE U ((u4.p1_0_8=...1782
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 4,0,214.359,2464392,1,0,3.55761e+06,817487,2242,4.80438e+06,1631,4.63919e+06,627737
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E(((u8.next_1==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_4==1)) U EG(((!(((AX(((u8.next_5==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_0==1))) + ((u8.next_12==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_5==1))) + ((u8.next_5=...404
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,((u8.next_1==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_4==1))),((!(((!(EX(!(((u8.next_5==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_0==1))))) + ((u8.next...454
(forward)formula 5,1,217.389,2464392,1,0,3.55761e+06,817487,2754,4.80438e+06,1956,4.63919e+06,1420283
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(EG((((A(((u8.next_11==1)&&(u7.p1_3_6==1)) U ((u8.next_5==1)&&(u2.ncs_5_1==1))) + !(((u8.next_7==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_3==1)))) + (EX(((u9.slot_...481
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U (((u9.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.F==1)&&(u5.cs_1_6==1))&&(u7.p1_3_11==1))) * ((!((u9.s...1009
(forward)formula 6,1,231.532,2464392,1,0,3.55761e+06,817487,3042,4.80438e+06,2006,4.63919e+06,4911083
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 2542781 ms.

BK_STOP 1680844427920

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202304061127.jar
+ VERSION=202304061127
+ echo 'Running Version 202304061127'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Anderson-PT-07"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Anderson-PT-07, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r517-tall-167987243300026"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Anderson-PT-07.tgz
mv Anderson-PT-07 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;