fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r490-tall-167912709100806
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of Marcie+red for TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
5450.376 8687.00 12870.00 237.50 TTFTFTTTTTTTTTTT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r490-tall-167912709100806.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool marciexred
Input is TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r490-tall-167912709100806
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 440K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K Feb 25 17:35 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K Feb 25 17:35 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K Feb 25 17:33 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K Feb 25 17:33 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 17:22 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Feb 25 17:22 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Feb 25 17:22 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 17:22 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 25 17:36 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 103K Feb 25 17:36 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 25 17:36 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K Feb 25 17:36 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Feb 25 17:22 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Feb 25 17:22 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10 Mar 5 18:23 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K Mar 5 18:23 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1679339148879

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=marciexred
BK_EXAMINATION=ReachabilityCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD
Applying reductions before tool marcie
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-20 19:05:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, ReachabilityCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2023-03-20 19:05:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-20 19:05:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 18 ms
[2023-03-20 19:05:50] [INFO ] Transformed 8 places.
[2023-03-20 19:05:50] [INFO ] Transformed 6 transitions.
[2023-03-20 19:05:50] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 8 places and 6 transitions and 18 arcs in 93 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/ReachabilityCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 82 resets, run finished after 191 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 94 resets, run finished after 177 ms. (steps per millisecond=56 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 12 resets, run finished after 133 ms. (steps per millisecond=75 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 188 ms. (steps per millisecond=53 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 123 ms. (steps per millisecond=81 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 94 ms. (steps per millisecond=106 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 53 ms. (steps per millisecond=188 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 58 ms. (steps per millisecond=172 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 56 ms. (steps per millisecond=178 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 45 ms. (steps per millisecond=222 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 46 ms. (steps per millisecond=217 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 48 ms. (steps per millisecond=208 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 63 ms. (steps per millisecond=158 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 46 ms. (steps per millisecond=217 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 7006 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 35891 steps, saw 7006 distinct states, run finished after 201 ms. (steps per millisecond=178 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 7006 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 35891 steps, saw 7006 distinct states, run finished after 165 ms. (steps per millisecond=217 ) properties seen :0
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL EXHAUSTIVE_WALK
All properties solved without resorting to model-checking.
Total runtime 1838 ms.
timeout --kill-after=10s --signal=SIGINT 1m for testing only

Marcie built on Linux at 2019-11-18.
A model checker for Generalized Stochastic Petri nets

authors: Alex Tovchigrechko (IDD package and CTL model checking)

Martin Schwarick (Symbolic numerical analysis and CSL model checking)

Christian Rohr (Simulative and approximative numerical model checking)

marcie@informatik.tu-cottbus.de

called as: /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../marcie/bin/marcie --net-file=model.pnml --mcc-file=ReachabilityCardinality.xml --memory=6 --mcc-mode

parse successfull
net created successfully

Net: TwoPhaseLocking_PT_nC00020vD
(NrP: 8 NrTr: 6 NrArc: 18)

parse formulas
formulas created successfully
place and transition orderings generation:0m 0.000sec

net check time: 0m 0.000sec

init dd package: 0m 2.775sec


RS generation: 0m 0.006sec


-> reachability set: #nodes 1122 (1.1e+03) #states 7,006 (3)



starting MCC model checker
--------------------------

checking: AG [haveA2<=18]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [haveA2<=18]]]

abstracting: (haveA2<=18)
states: 7,006 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.000sec

checking: AG [resA<=11]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [resA<=11]]]

abstracting: (resA<=11)
states: 7,006 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.000sec

checking: AG [resB<=19]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [resB<=19]]]

abstracting: (resB<=19)
states: 7,006 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.000sec

checking: AG [haveA<=haveA]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [haveA<=haveA]]]

abstracting: (haveA<=haveA)
states: 7,006 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.000sec

checking: AG [haveA<=haveA]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [haveA<=haveA]]]

abstracting: (haveA<=haveA)
states: 7,006 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.000sec

checking: EF [~ [[haveA2<=13 & resB<=Clients]]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [[haveA2<=13 & resB<=Clients]]]

abstracting: (resB<=Clients)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=13)
states: 7,006 (3)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.001sec

checking: AG [~ [[[18<=haveA | ~ [resA<=haveA2andB]] & [~ [[19<=haveA2andB & [~ [[[Clients<=haveA2andB & haveA<=0] | haveAandB<=haveAandB]] & Clients<=resB]]] & [14<=resB & 17<=Clients]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U [[[14<=resB & 17<=Clients] & ~ [[[~ [[[Clients<=haveA2andB & haveA<=0] | haveAandB<=haveAandB]] & Clients<=resB] & 19<=haveA2andB]]] & [~ [resA<=haveA2andB] | 18<=haveA]]]]

abstracting: (18<=haveA)
states: 0
abstracting: (resA<=haveA2andB)
states: 3,485 (3)
abstracting: (19<=haveA2andB)
states: 0
abstracting: (Clients<=resB)
states: 120
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveAandB)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=0)
states: 1,715 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=haveA2andB)
states: 65
abstracting: (17<=Clients)
states: 56
abstracting: (14<=resB)
states: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.005sec

checking: AG [[[[resB<=13 | ~ [haveA2<=15]] & ~ [[~ [[[haveA2andB<=haveB & 12<=haveA2] | [haveA2andB<=18 | resB<=resA]]] & ~ [[[[resB<=haveB | haveA<=16] | ~ [resA<=haveA2]] | [haveA<=resA & [haveA<=14 | Clients<=18]]]]]]] | 15<=resA]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[~ [[~ [[[[haveA<=14 | Clients<=18] & haveA<=resA] | [~ [resA<=haveA2] | [resB<=haveB | haveA<=16]]]] & ~ [[[haveA2andB<=18 | resB<=resA] | [haveA2andB<=haveB & 12<=haveA2]]]]] & [~ [haveA2<=15] | resB<=13]] | 15<=resA]]]]

abstracting: (15<=resA)
states: 0
abstracting: (resB<=13)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=15)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (12<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveB)
states: 5,298 (3)
abstracting: (resB<=resA)
states: 3,002 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=18)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=16)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (resB<=haveB)
states: 3,758 (3)
abstracting: (resA<=haveA2)
states: 3,968 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=resA)
states: 3,968 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=18)
states: 7,000 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=14)
states: 7,006 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.007sec

checking: AG [[haveB<=1 | [~ [[haveAandB<=14 & [[[~ [[resA<=haveB & Clients<=haveA2andB]] | [haveA2<=6 & 2<=haveA2andB]] & [~ [16<=haveB] & haveA<=haveB]] & ~ [[~ [8<=haveB] | [haveAandB<=4 | [17<=Clients & 2<=haveA2andB]]]]]]] | ~ [[~ [haveA2<=haveA] & haveB<=18]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[~ [[~ [haveA2<=haveA] & haveB<=18]] | ~ [[[~ [[[[17<=Clients & 2<=haveA2andB] | haveAandB<=4] | ~ [8<=haveB]]] & [[~ [16<=haveB] & haveA<=haveB] & [[haveA2<=6 & 2<=haveA2andB] | ~ [[resA<=haveB & Clients<=haveA2andB]]]]] & haveAandB<=14]]] | haveB<=1]]]]

abstracting: (haveB<=1)
states: 1,991 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=14)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=haveA2andB)
states: 65
abstracting: (resA<=haveB)
states: 5,004 (3)
abstracting: (2<=haveA2andB)
states: 2,871 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=6)
states: 6,664 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=haveB)
states: 5,004 (3)
abstracting: (16<=haveB)
states: 0
abstracting: (8<=haveB)
states: 552
abstracting: (haveAandB<=4)
states: 6,502 (3)
abstracting: (2<=haveA2andB)
states: 2,871 (3)
abstracting: (17<=Clients)
states: 56
abstracting: (haveB<=18)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveA)
states: 3,969 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.004sec

checking: AG [[[~ [18<=haveAandB] | [20<=haveA2andB & [[haveA<=resA & 2<=Clients] & ~ [resB<=haveA2]]]] | [~ [[[[[haveAandB<=3 & ~ [2<=haveB]] & [11<=haveA2 | ~ [haveAandB<=9]]] & ~ [[12<=haveA2andB & [[19<=haveA2 & haveA2<=17] | haveAandB<=haveA2]]]] | [~ [resA<=3] | ~ [haveA2andB<=haveA2]]]] | ~ [haveAandB<=11]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[~ [haveAandB<=11] | ~ [[[~ [haveA2andB<=haveA2] | ~ [resA<=3]] | [~ [[[[19<=haveA2 & haveA2<=17] | haveAandB<=haveA2] & 12<=haveA2andB]] & [[~ [haveAandB<=9] | 11<=haveA2] & [~ [2<=haveB] & haveAandB<=3]]]]]] | [[[~ [resB<=haveA2] & [haveA<=resA & 2<=Clients]] & 20<=haveA2andB] | ~ [18<=haveAandB]]]]]]

abstracting: (18<=haveAandB)
states: 0
abstracting: (20<=haveA2andB)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=Clients)
states: 6,955 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=resA)
states: 3,968 (3)
abstracting: (resB<=haveA2)
states: 3,002 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=3)
states: 6,040 (3)
abstracting: (2<=haveB)
states: 5,015 (3)
abstracting: (11<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveAandB<=9)
states: 7,005 (3)
abstracting: (12<=haveA2andB)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveA2)
states: 4,696 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=17)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (19<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (resA<=3)
states: 5,200 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveA2)
states: 4,696 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=11)
states: 7,006 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.005sec

checking: AG [[~ [haveB<=4] | [~ [haveA2<=haveAandB] | [~ [[[Clients<=2 & [10<=Clients & [~ [haveB<=resB] | [haveA2<=resA & haveAandB<=8]]]] & ~ [[[haveAandB<=6 | [haveA<=13 & resB<=resA]] | [3<=haveA2andB | [resB<=20 | Clients<=haveA2]]]]]] | ~ [resA<=haveAandB]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[[[~ [resA<=haveAandB] | ~ [[~ [[[3<=haveA2andB | [resB<=20 | Clients<=haveA2]] | [haveAandB<=6 | [haveA<=13 & resB<=resA]]]] & [Clients<=2 & [10<=Clients & [[haveA2<=resA & haveAandB<=8] | ~ [haveB<=resB]]]]]]] | ~ [haveA2<=haveAandB]] | ~ [haveB<=4]]]]]

abstracting: (haveB<=4)
states: 4,683 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveAandB)
states: 3,486 (3)
abstracting: (haveB<=resB)
states: 3,759 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=8)
states: 6,998 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=resA)
states: 3,969 (3)
abstracting: (10<=Clients)
states: 3,003 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=2)
states: 146
abstracting: (resB<=resA)
states: 3,002 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=13)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=6)
states: 6,908 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=haveA2)
states: 629
abstracting: (resB<=20)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (3<=haveA2andB)
states: 1,716 (3)
abstracting: (resA<=haveAandB)
states: 3,485 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.009sec

checking: AG [[[6<=haveA2 | [~ [17<=haveB] | [~ [[[[[resB<=resA & Clients<=4] & haveB<=resB] | [~ [haveA<=haveA] & 1<=Clients]] & [20<=resB | [[resA<=Clients | haveA2<=19] & 10<=haveAandB]]]] & [[[[[haveB<=3 & 6<=haveA2andB] & [haveA<=7 & Clients<=Clients]] | [~ [haveB<=20] & [haveA<=17 | haveA2andB<=15]]] | haveB<=18] | 7<=haveB]]]] | 17<=haveA]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[17<=haveA | [6<=haveA2 | [[[7<=haveB | [haveB<=18 | [[[haveA<=17 | haveA2andB<=15] & ~ [haveB<=20]] | [[haveA<=7 & Clients<=Clients] & [haveB<=3 & 6<=haveA2andB]]]]] & ~ [[[20<=resB | [10<=haveAandB & [resA<=Clients | haveA2<=19]]] & [[1<=Clients & ~ [haveA<=haveA]] | [haveB<=resB & [resB<=resA & Clients<=4]]]]]] | ~ [17<=haveB]]]]]]]

abstracting: (17<=haveB)
states: 0
abstracting: (Clients<=4)
states: 601
abstracting: (resB<=resA)
states: 3,002 (3)
abstracting: (haveB<=resB)
states: 3,759 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=haveA)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (1<=Clients)
states: 6,996 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=19)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (resA<=Clients)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (10<=haveAandB)
states: 1
abstracting: (20<=resB)
states: 0
abstracting: (6<=haveA2andB)
states: 238
abstracting: (haveB<=3)
states: 3,857 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=Clients)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=7)
states: 6,853 (3)
abstracting: (haveB<=20)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=15)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=17)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveB<=18)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (7<=haveB)
states: 1,007 (3)
abstracting: (6<=haveA2)
states: 657
abstracting: (17<=haveA)
states: 0
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.005sec

checking: AG [[haveA2andB<=haveA2andB | ~ [[[~ [[[[[6<=haveA2 & haveA2andB<=6] | haveB<=Clients] | haveAandB<=haveA2] | [haveA2<=resA & [haveA<=8 | [resB<=haveB & haveA2andB<=haveAandB]]]]] | haveA2<=resB] | [[~ [[[~ [16<=haveA2] & [haveA<=12 & resB<=haveA2andB]] | [haveA<=haveA2andB | ~ [haveB<=Clients]]]] & haveA2andB<=16] | 12<=Clients]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[haveA2andB<=haveA2andB | ~ [[[12<=Clients | [haveA2andB<=16 & ~ [[[haveA<=haveA2andB | ~ [haveB<=Clients]] | [[haveA<=12 & resB<=haveA2andB] & ~ [16<=haveA2]]]]]] | [haveA2<=resB | ~ [[[haveA2<=resA & [haveA<=8 | [resB<=haveB & haveA2andB<=haveAandB]]] | [haveAandB<=haveA2 | [haveB<=Clients | [6<=haveA2 & haveA2andB<=6]]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (haveA2andB<=6)
states: 6,908 (3)
abstracting: (6<=haveA2)
states: 657
abstracting: (haveB<=Clients)
states: 5,985 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveA2)
states: 4,696 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveAandB)
states: 4,213 (3)
abstracting: (resB<=haveB)
states: 3,758 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=8)
states: 6,953 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=resA)
states: 3,969 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=resB)
states: 5,005 (3)
abstracting: (16<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (resB<=haveA2andB)
states: 2,568 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=12)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveB<=Clients)
states: 5,985 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=haveA2andB)
states: 3,485 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=16)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (12<=Clients)
states: 1,287 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveA2andB)
states: 7,006 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.006sec

checking: AG [[[[~ [haveA2<=resB] | ~ [[~ [haveA<=haveB] | [17<=resB & [~ [16<=resB] | [17<=haveA2 | haveA<=haveA2andB]]]]]] & ~ [haveAandB<=haveAandB]] | ~ [[[[Clients<=haveA2 | 2<=Clients] & ~ [10<=Clients]] & ~ [[[resB<=16 & [resB<=10 | ~ [[16<=Clients & 13<=haveAandB]]]] | [[[haveA2<=haveB & 14<=haveA2] & ~ [Clients<=haveB]] & [[[haveA<=haveA2andB | haveA<=17] | 4<=haveB] & 4<=Clients]]]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[~ [[~ [[[[4<=Clients & [4<=haveB | [haveA<=haveA2andB | haveA<=17]]] & [~ [Clients<=haveB] & [haveA2<=haveB & 14<=haveA2]]] | [resB<=16 & [resB<=10 | ~ [[16<=Clients & 13<=haveAandB]]]]]] & [~ [10<=Clients] & [Clients<=haveA2 | 2<=Clients]]]] | [~ [haveAandB<=haveAandB] & [~ [[[17<=resB & [[17<=haveA2 | haveA<=haveA2andB] | ~ [16<=resB]]] | ~ [haveA<=haveB]]] | ~ [haveA2<=resB]]]]]]]

abstracting: (haveA2<=resB)
states: 5,005 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=haveB)
states: 5,004 (3)
abstracting: (16<=resB)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA<=haveA2andB)
states: 3,485 (3)
abstracting: (17<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (17<=resB)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveAandB)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (2<=Clients)
states: 6,955 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=haveA2)
states: 629
abstracting: (10<=Clients)
states: 3,003 (3)
abstracting: (13<=haveAandB)
states: 0
abstracting: (16<=Clients)
states: 126
abstracting: (resB<=10)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (resB<=16)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (14<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveB)
states: 5,004 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=haveB)
states: 1,357 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=17)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveA<=haveA2andB)
states: 3,485 (3)
abstracting: (4<=haveB)
states: 3,149 (3)
abstracting: (4<=Clients)
states: 6,685 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.005sec

checking: AG [[[haveB<=6 & ~ [16<=resA]] | ~ [[~ [[4<=resA & [~ [haveAandB<=3] | ~ [19<=haveA2andB]]]] & [resB<=resA & [[~ [[~ [20<=haveA2andB] & [resB<=haveA | 17<=haveA]]] & [[[14<=resA & haveB<=haveB] & ~ [haveB<=20]] & [~ [haveAandB<=haveA2] & haveB<=10]]] & [~ [[3<=haveA2andB & [2<=haveA & 9<=haveB]]] | [[[resB<=haveB & resB<=resA] | [resA<=haveA & resB<=haveA]] & haveAandB<=11]]]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[~ [[[resB<=resA & [[[haveAandB<=11 & [[resA<=haveA & resB<=haveA] | [resB<=haveB & resB<=resA]]] | ~ [[3<=haveA2andB & [2<=haveA & 9<=haveB]]]] & [[[haveB<=10 & ~ [haveAandB<=haveA2]] & [~ [haveB<=20] & [14<=resA & haveB<=haveB]]] & ~ [[[resB<=haveA | 17<=haveA] & ~ [20<=haveA2andB]]]]]] & ~ [[4<=resA & [~ [19<=haveA2andB] | ~ [haveAandB<=3]]]]]] | [haveB<=6 & ~ [16<=resA]]]]]]

abstracting: (16<=resA)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveB<=6)
states: 5,999 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=3)
states: 6,040 (3)
abstracting: (19<=haveA2andB)
states: 0
abstracting: (4<=resA)
states: 1,806 (3)
abstracting: (20<=haveA2andB)
states: 0
abstracting: (17<=haveA)
states: 0
abstracting: (resB<=haveA)
states: 3,002 (3)
abstracting: (haveB<=haveB)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (14<=resA)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveB<=20)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveA2)
states: 4,696 (3)
abstracting: (haveB<=10)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (9<=haveB)
states: 241
abstracting: (2<=haveA)
states: 3,861 (3)
abstracting: (3<=haveA2andB)
states: 1,716 (3)
abstracting: (resB<=resA)
states: 3,002 (3)
abstracting: (resB<=haveB)
states: 3,758 (3)
abstracting: (resB<=haveA)
states: 3,002 (3)
abstracting: (resA<=haveA)
states: 3,968 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=11)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (resB<=resA)
states: 3,002 (3)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.004sec

checking: EF [[~ [[haveA2<=14 & [[[[~ [haveB<=haveB] | [[11<=resA | resB<=haveAandB] | haveAandB<=haveA]] | [~ [[13<=resB & 16<=resA]] & ~ [12<=Clients]]] | ~ [[[~ [haveAandB<=5] | [haveAandB<=haveA | resA<=14]] & ~ [[haveAandB<=resB | haveA2<=17]]]]] & [[[~ [[resB<=18 | 16<=Clients]] | [[haveA2andB<=20 & 20<=haveAandB] | ~ [Clients<=12]]] | [~ [[19<=Clients & 11<=haveA2]] & [[12<=Clients | haveAandB<=resA] | [Clients<=haveA & haveA2<=haveAandB]]]] | [~ [[~ [8<=haveA2andB] & 5<=resA]] & ~ [[haveA2andB<=Clients | resA<=haveA2andB]]]]]]] & ~ [[[resA<=15 | haveA2andB<=9] | [[~ [[~ [14<=haveAandB] | [haveA<=haveA2andB & 18<=haveA]]] | [[[[15<=haveB | Clients<=resB] & [4<=haveA2andB & 2<=haveA]] & [[haveA2andB<=haveB | Clients<=resB] | ~ [haveA2<=11]]] & [[[Clients<=14 | haveB<=haveA] | haveAandB<=resB] & ~ [13<=resB]]]] & 1<=resA]]]]]
normalized: E [true U [~ [[[1<=resA & [[[~ [13<=resB] & [haveAandB<=resB | [Clients<=14 | haveB<=haveA]]] & [[~ [haveA2<=11] | [haveA2andB<=haveB | Clients<=resB]] & [[4<=haveA2andB & 2<=haveA] & [15<=haveB | Clients<=resB]]]] | ~ [[[haveA<=haveA2andB & 18<=haveA] | ~ [14<=haveAandB]]]]] | [resA<=15 | haveA2andB<=9]]] & ~ [[haveA2<=14 & [[[~ [[haveA2andB<=Clients | resA<=haveA2andB]] & ~ [[5<=resA & ~ [8<=haveA2andB]]]] | [[[[Clients<=haveA & haveA2<=haveAandB] | [12<=Clients | haveAandB<=resA]] & ~ [[19<=Clients & 11<=haveA2]]] | [[~ [Clients<=12] | [haveA2andB<=20 & 20<=haveAandB]] | ~ [[resB<=18 | 16<=Clients]]]]] & [~ [[~ [[haveAandB<=resB | haveA2<=17]] & [[haveAandB<=haveA | resA<=14] | ~ [haveAandB<=5]]]] | [[~ [12<=Clients] & ~ [[13<=resB & 16<=resA]]] | [[haveAandB<=haveA | [11<=resA | resB<=haveAandB]] | ~ [haveB<=haveB]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (haveB<=haveB)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (resB<=haveAandB)
states: 2,568 (3)
abstracting: (11<=resA)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveA)
states: 4,696 (3)
abstracting: (16<=resA)
states: 0
abstracting: (13<=resB)
states: 0
abstracting: (12<=Clients)
states: 1,287 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=5)
states: 6,768 (3)
abstracting: (resA<=14)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=haveA)
states: 4,696 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=17)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=resB)
states: 5,298 (3)
abstracting: (16<=Clients)
states: 126
abstracting: (resB<=18)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (20<=haveAandB)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=20)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=12)
states: 6,214 (3)
abstracting: (11<=haveA2)
states: 0
abstracting: (19<=Clients)
states: 6
abstracting: (haveAandB<=resA)
states: 4,696 (3)
abstracting: (12<=Clients)
states: 1,287 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=haveAandB)
states: 3,486 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=haveA)
states: 629
abstracting: (8<=haveA2andB)
states: 33
abstracting: (5<=resA)
states: 1,134 (3)
abstracting: (resA<=haveA2andB)
states: 3,485 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=Clients)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=14)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=9)
states: 7,005 (3)
abstracting: (resA<=15)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (14<=haveAandB)
states: 0
abstracting: (18<=haveA)
states: 0
abstracting: (haveA<=haveA2andB)
states: 3,485 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=resB)
states: 120
abstracting: (15<=haveB)
states: 0
abstracting: (2<=haveA)
states: 3,861 (3)
abstracting: (4<=haveA2andB)
states: 966
abstracting: (Clients<=resB)
states: 120
abstracting: (haveA2andB<=haveB)
states: 5,298 (3)
abstracting: (haveA2<=11)
states: 7,006 (3)
abstracting: (haveB<=haveA)
states: 3,003 (3)
abstracting: (Clients<=14)
states: 6,754 (3)
abstracting: (haveAandB<=resB)
states: 5,298 (3)
abstracting: (13<=resB)
states: 0
abstracting: (1<=resA)
states: 5,291 (3)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD-ReachabilityCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.013sec

totally nodes used: 16593 (1.7e+04)
number of garbage collections: 0
fire ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 34595 13845 48440
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 15294 67093570 16 1024MB
basic ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 118727 125421 244148
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 160889 16616327 12 192MB
unary ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 8 128MB
abstract ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 12 192MB
state nr cache: hits/miss/sum: 26199 9972 36171
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 9972 8378636 32 256MB
max state cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 8388608 32 256MB
uniqueHash elements/entry size/size: 67108864 4 256MB
0 67093947
1 14268
2 464
3 92
4 29
5 3
6 3
7 2
8 5
9 1
>= 10 50

Total processing time: 0m 4.462sec


BK_STOP 1679339157566

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination ReachabilityCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
check for maximal unmarked siphon
ok
check for constant places
ok
check if there are places and transitions
ok
check if there are transitions without pre-places
ok
check if at least one transition is enabled in m0
ok
check if there are transitions that can never fire
ok


initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:268 (44), effective:87 (14)

initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="marciexred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool marciexred"
echo " Input is TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r490-tall-167912709100806"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD.tgz
mv TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00020vD execution
cd execution
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME ReachabilityCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;