About the Execution of ITS-Tools for StigmergyElection-PT-03b
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
1076.039 | 532476.00 | 583483.00 | 2050.20 | TFTFFFFTTFFTTFFT | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r453-smll-167912645600578.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyElection-PT-03b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r453-smll-167912645600578
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 560K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K Feb 26 16:27 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K Feb 26 16:27 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K Feb 26 16:27 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K Feb 26 16:27 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Feb 25 17:14 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Feb 25 17:14 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Feb 25 17:14 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 17:14 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 26 16:28 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 112K Feb 26 16:28 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K Feb 26 16:28 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K Feb 26 16:28 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Feb 25 17:14 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 17:14 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 Mar 5 18:23 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 117K Mar 5 18:23 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1679409142119
bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyElection-PT-03b
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-21 14:32:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-21 14:32:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-21 14:32:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 164 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:25] [INFO ] Transformed 427 places.
[2023-03-21 14:32:25] [INFO ] Transformed 518 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:32:25] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2023-03-21 14:32:25] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 427 places and 518 transitions and 1323 arcs in 326 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 26 ms.
Support contains 122 out of 427 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 427/427 places, 518/518 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 392 transition count 483
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 392 transition count 483
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 379 transition count 470
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 379 transition count 470
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 378 transition count 469
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 378 transition count 469
Applied a total of 98 rules in 176 ms. Remains 378 /427 variables (removed 49) and now considering 469/518 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 469 rows 378 cols
[2023-03-21 14:32:26] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 27 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 546 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:32:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:32:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 491 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:32:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:32:27] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 572 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 378/427 places, 469/518 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1863 ms. Remains : 378/427 places, 469/518 transitions.
Support contains 122 out of 378 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-21 14:32:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 139 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 61 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 469 transitions.
Support contains 121 out of 378 places (down from 122) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 171 resets, run finished after 879 ms. (steps per millisecond=11 ) properties (out of 96) seen :43
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 53) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 53) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 51) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 49) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 49) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 49) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 49) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 49) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 49) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 48) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 48) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 47) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 47) seen :5
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 42 properties.
[2023-03-21 14:32:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:32:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2023-03-21 14:32:31] [INFO ] After 694ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :17 real:24
[2023-03-21 14:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 176 places in 219 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-21 14:32:32] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 280 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 177 places in 178 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-21 14:32:32] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 230 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 180 places in 233 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-21 14:32:33] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 263 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 174 places in 168 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-21 14:32:33] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 217 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:33] [INFO ] After 2521ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :2 sat :12 real:28
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 369 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:32:33] [INFO ] After 3679ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :2 sat :0 real:40
[2023-03-21 14:32:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2023-03-21 14:32:36] [INFO ] After 1275ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :39
[2023-03-21 14:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 176 places in 160 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-21 14:32:36] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 222 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 177 places in 184 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-21 14:32:37] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 247 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 175 places in 128 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-21 14:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 174 places in 130 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-21 14:32:37] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 347 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 173 places in 152 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-21 14:32:37] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 203 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:38] [INFO ] After 3757ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :38
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 746 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:32:39] [INFO ] After 5457ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :38
Fused 42 Parikh solutions to 38 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 29 properties in 308 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 378 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 368 edges and 378 vertex of which 49 / 378 are part of one of the 7 SCC in 8 ms
Free SCC test removed 42 places
Drop transitions removed 55 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 55 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 544 edges and 336 vertex of which 334 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 230 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 230 transitions
Performed 230 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 230
Iterating post reduction 0 with 231 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 334 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 230 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 234 rules applied. Total rules applied 467 place count 104 transition count 178
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 473 place count 102 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 98 transition count 174
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 98 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 499 place count 87 transition count 163
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 507 place count 79 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 515 place count 79 transition count 154
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 516 place count 79 transition count 153
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 517 place count 78 transition count 153
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 517 place count 78 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 521 place count 76 transition count 151
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 523 place count 74 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 525 place count 74 transition count 140
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 526 place count 74 transition count 139
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 544 place count 65 transition count 130
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 549 place count 65 transition count 125
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 557 place count 57 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 8 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 565 place count 57 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 571 place count 57 transition count 83
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 581 place count 52 transition count 78
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 587 place count 49 transition count 82
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 591 place count 49 transition count 78
Free-agglomeration rule applied 17 times.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 608 place count 49 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 628 place count 32 transition count 58
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 10 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 631 place count 29 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 10 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 634 place count 29 transition count 55
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 635 place count 29 transition count 54
Applied a total of 635 rules in 117 ms. Remains 29 /378 variables (removed 349) and now considering 54/469 (removed 415) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 117 ms. Remains : 29/378 places, 54/469 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 242 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 9) seen :8
Finished Best-First random walk after 6801 steps, including 2 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=523 )
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-21 14:32:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 469 transitions.
Support contains 106 out of 378 places (down from 108) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 49 stabilizing places and 52 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 355 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 355 transition count 446
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 341 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 341 transition count 432
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 338 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 338 transition count 429
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 337 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 337 transition count 428
Applied a total of 82 rules in 60 ms. Remains 337 /378 variables (removed 41) and now considering 428/469 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 428 rows 337 cols
[2023-03-21 14:32:40] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 6 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:32:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:32:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 287 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 402 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:32:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:32:41] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 450 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 337/378 places, 428/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 917 ms. Remains : 337/378 places, 428/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:32:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 428 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:32:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5958372737803954565.gal : 18 ms
[2023-03-21 14:32:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16941568648203624648.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5958372737803954565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16941568648203624648.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05246e+07,1.97856,52808,2,6159,5,162365,6,0,1778,244261,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((p26==1)&&(p173==1))&&(p321==1)) U (EF((((p202!=1) + A((p21==1) U (p113==1))) * E((((p85==1)&&(p233==1))&&(p343==1)) U (p297==1)))) *...272
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,(((p26==1)&&(p173==1))&&(p321==1))) * E(TRUE U (((p202!=1) + !((E(!((p113==1)) U (!((p21==1)) * !(...688
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t60, t94, t95, t96, t129, t130, t132, t149, t158, t192, t193, t194, t227, t228, t230, t2...313
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-21 14:33:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-21 14:33:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5797401097794632595.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5797401097794632595.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5797401097794632595.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5797401097794632595.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5797401097794632595.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-21 14:33:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-21 14:33:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-21 14:33:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 342 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:33:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 175 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 28 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:33:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12570102302037320655.gal : 18 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4152572636534630519.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12570102302037320655.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4152572636534630519.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05246e+07,0.21303,7016,618,16,5606,377,624,6223,60,804,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((i1.i0.u7.p26==1)&&(i9.i0.u53.p173==1))&&(i17.i2.u98.p321==1)) U (EF((((i10.u60.p202!=1) + A((i0.i1.u6.p21==1) U (i5.u34.p113==1))) *...456
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,(((i1.i0.u7.p26==1)&&(i9.i0.u53.p173==1))&&(i17.i2.u98.p321==1))) * E(TRUE U (((i10.u60.p202!=1) +...1063
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t96, t129, t130, t132, t149, t193, t194, t228, t230, t246, t326, t328, t345, t346, t348,...369
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,3.98922,116576,1,0,239256,411,5100,315293,291,816,595321
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 357 transition count 448
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 357 transition count 448
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 344 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 344 transition count 435
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 340 transition count 431
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 340 transition count 431
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 338 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 338 transition count 429
Applied a total of 80 rules in 67 ms. Remains 338 /378 variables (removed 40) and now considering 429/469 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 429 rows 338 cols
[2023-03-21 14:33:16] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 144 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:33:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:33:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 734 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 907 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:33:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:33:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 415 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 338/378 places, 429/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1400 ms. Remains : 338/378 places, 429/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 429 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3457574864454565059.gal : 12 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10461085236467741579.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3457574864454565059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10461085236467741579.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06235e+07,2.0861,55312,2,5939,5,165161,6,0,1783,245151,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(E((p414==1) U (p231==1)) U AG(!(((p292==1)||(p381==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),E((p414==1) U (p231==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(((p292==1)||(p381==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t60, t94, t95, t96, t130, t131, t133, t150, t159, t167, t195, t196, t197, t230, t231, t2...325
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-21 14:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-21 14:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2399827974284087649.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2399827974284087649.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2399827974284087649.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2399827974284087649.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2399827974284087649.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-21 14:33:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-21 14:33:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-21 14:33:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 342 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:33:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3469219901386727681.gal : 10 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12024706879808186055.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3469219901386727681.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12024706879808186055.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06235e+07,0.158279,7668,718,19,6663,326,572,7990,65,595,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(E((i23.u128.p414==1) U (i12.i0.i2.u73.p231==1)) U AG(!(((i15.u88.p292==1)||(i17.u117.p381==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),E((i23.u128.p414==1) U (i12.i0.i2.u73.p231==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(((i15.u88.p292==1)||(i17.u117....179
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t95, t96, t196, t197, t230, t233, t249, t293, t294, t328, t330, t347, t348, t350, i0.u3....404
(forward)formula 0,0,1.07396,37500,1,0,65844,326,4417,98652,284,595,295980
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 356 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 356 transition count 447
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 343 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 343 transition count 434
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 340 transition count 431
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 340 transition count 431
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 339 transition count 430
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 339 transition count 430
Applied a total of 78 rules in 40 ms. Remains 339 /378 variables (removed 39) and now considering 430/469 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 430 rows 339 cols
[2023-03-21 14:33:49] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:33:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:33:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 340 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 488 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:33:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:33:50] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 342 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 339/378 places, 430/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 877 ms. Remains : 339/378 places, 430/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:33:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 430 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:33:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10152223385662627281.gal : 4 ms
[2023-03-21 14:33:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13330753933059083644.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10152223385662627281.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13330753933059083644.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06465e+07,2.26937,51048,2,5786,5,157116,6,0,1788,237470,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(((p286==0) + (AG(A((p248==1) U (p298==1))) * !(A((p325==1) U (p36==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(((p286==0) + (!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((p298==1)) U (!((p248==1)) * !((p298==1)))) + EG(!((p298==1)))))...246
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t61, t99, t100, t133, t134, t136, t153, t162, t196, t197, t198, t231, t232, t234, t250, ...315
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-21 14:34:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2023-03-21 14:34:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-21 14:34:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph843959716417722575.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph843959716417722575.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph843959716417722575.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph843959716417722575.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph843959716417722575.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-21 14:34:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-21 14:34:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-21 14:34:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 338 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:34:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2023-03-21 14:34:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:34:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15303726289830668447.gal : 7 ms
[2023-03-21 14:34:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17850450251793595137.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15303726289830668447.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17850450251793595137.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06465e+07,0.220872,7324,649,24,5868,445,679,6905,71,932,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(((i15.i0.u84.p286==0) + (AG(A((i13.i0.u73.p248==1) U (i16.i0.u87.p298==1))) * !(A((i18.i0.u97.p325==1) U (i1.i2.u10.p36==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(((i15.i0.u84.p286==0) + (!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((i16.i0.u87.p298==1)) U (!((i13.i0.u73.p248==1)) * !(...342
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t99, t100, t134, t136, t198, t231, t232, t234, t295, t328, t329, t331, t348, t349, t351, i3.t...403
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
(forward)formula 0,1,10.8098,286108,1,0,584469,574,5290,810793,334,1987,1305892
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 355 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 355 transition count 446
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 341 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 341 transition count 432
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 337 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 337 transition count 428
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 335 transition count 426
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 335 transition count 426
Applied a total of 86 rules in 64 ms. Remains 335 /378 variables (removed 43) and now considering 426/469 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 426 rows 335 cols
[2023-03-21 14:34:31] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 5 ms
[2023-03-21 14:34:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:34:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:34:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 412 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 575 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:34:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:34:32] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 515 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 335/378 places, 426/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1160 ms. Remains : 335/378 places, 426/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:34:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-21 14:34:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-21 14:34:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 426 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:34:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-21 14:34:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-21 14:34:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15674806413474409219.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:34:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12909954739936685051.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15674806413474409219.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12909954739936685051.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04368e+07,2.3059,52760,2,6563,5,163098,6,0,1768,240578,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((((p85==1)&&(p220==1))&&(p355==1))) U AX(AG(AX(AX((((p119==1)&&(p256==1))&&(p391==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(!(EX(!((((p119==1)&&(p256==1))&&(p391==1)))))))))))))))))) * !(E(!(!...381
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t60, t94, t95, t96, t129, t130, t132, t149, t158, t192, t193, t194, t227, t228, t230, t2...319
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-21 14:35:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-21 14:35:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15038502421512226679.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15038502421512226679.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15038502421512226679.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15038502421512226679.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15038502421512226679.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-21 14:35:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-21 14:35:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-21 14:35:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 333 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:35:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:35:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14352289955972977529.gal : 4 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10537663251269810454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14352289955972977529.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10537663251269810454.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04368e+07,0.19553,8320,577,18,7963,381,687,9024,62,868,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((((i5.i0.u25.p85==1)&&(i14.i0.u64.p220==1))&&(i22.i0.u104.p355==1))) U AX(AG(AX(AX((((i13.i0.u36.p119==1)&&(i13.i1.u75.p256==1))&&(i1...178
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(!(EX(!((((i13.i0.u36.p119==1)&&(i13.i1.u75.p256==1))&&(i13.i2.u79.p3...513
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t96, t129, t130, t132, t149, t194, t227, t228, t230, t246, t291, t324, t325, t327, t344,...376
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
(forward)formula 0,0,18.8302,404716,1,0,723507,520,4980,1.12082e+06,294,1321,1813753
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 356 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 356 transition count 447
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 343 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 343 transition count 434
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 339 transition count 430
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 339 transition count 430
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 337 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 337 transition count 428
Applied a total of 82 rules in 33 ms. Remains 337 /378 variables (removed 41) and now considering 428/469 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 428 rows 337 cols
[2023-03-21 14:35:22] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:35:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:35:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 357 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 467 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:35:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:35:23] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 505 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 337/378 places, 428/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1007 ms. Remains : 337/378 places, 428/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 428 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5279793978344026932.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9441920279575170444.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5279793978344026932.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9441920279575170444.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05587e+07,2.41508,53404,2,6517,5,163628,6,0,1778,246270,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p63==1) * AG(AX((p358==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p63==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((p358==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t60, t94, t95, t96, t129, t130, t132, t149, t158, t192, t193, t194, t227, t228, t230, t2...319
(forward)formula 0,0,17.1857,327664,1,0,570,1.44503e+06,879,405,10864,1.07786e+06,871
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 358 transition count 449
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 358 transition count 449
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 346 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 346 transition count 437
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 342 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 342 transition count 433
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 340 transition count 431
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 340 transition count 431
Applied a total of 76 rules in 29 ms. Remains 340 /378 variables (removed 38) and now considering 431/469 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 431 rows 340 cols
[2023-03-21 14:35:40] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:35:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:35:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 331 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 450 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:35:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:35:41] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 514 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 340/378 places, 431/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 996 ms. Remains : 340/378 places, 431/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 431 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability187407382340857753.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-21 14:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3635812488866955889.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability187407382340857753.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3635812488866955889.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15067e+07,2.40964,53936,2,8554,5,165561,6,0,1793,249163,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A((p104!=1) U E(!(EF((p231==1))) U (((p51==1)&&(p186==1)) * ((p308==1) * ((p287!=1) + EX((p426==1))))))) U (p244==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(E(!(E(TRUE U (p231==1))) U (((p51==1)&&(p186==1)) * ((p308==1) * ((p287!=1) + EX((p426==1))))...408
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, t39, t53, t62, t96, t97, t98, t131, t132, t133, t134, t151, t160, t168, t196, t197, t198...353
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-21 14:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-21 14:36:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-21 14:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8748725063149977769.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8748725063149977769.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8748725063149977769.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8748725063149977769.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8748725063149977769.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-21 14:36:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-21 14:36:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-21 14:36:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 334 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2023-03-21 14:36:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:36:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2595612229334388854.gal : 5 ms
[2023-03-21 14:36:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3414094145906676155.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2595612229334388854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3414094145906676155.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15067e+07,0.302893,9488,908,25,10564,585,602,13314,71,1476,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A((i6.u34.p104!=1) U E(!(EF((i13.i1.i1.u68.p231==1))) U (((i15.u15.p51==1)&&(i8.u54.p186==1)) * ((i18.u91.p308==1) * ((i16.u83.p287!=1)...205
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(E(!(E(TRUE U (i13.i1.i1.u68.p231==1))) U (((i15.u15.p51==1)&&(i8.u54.p186==1)) * ((i18.u91.p3...584
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t53, t98, t131, t132, t134, t198, t231, t232, t233, t234, t250, t296, t329, t330, t332, t349,...445
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
(forward)formula 0,0,24.6718,586600,1,0,1.0956e+06,590,4971,1.76454e+06,349,1836,2081520
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 360 transition count 451
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 360 transition count 451
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 349 transition count 440
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 349 transition count 440
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 347 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 347 transition count 438
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 345 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 345 transition count 436
Applied a total of 66 rules in 29 ms. Remains 345 /378 variables (removed 33) and now considering 436/469 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 436 rows 345 cols
[2023-03-21 14:36:36] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:36:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:36:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:36:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 273 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 378 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:36:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:36:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 281 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 345/378 places, 436/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 690 ms. Remains : 345/378 places, 436/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:36:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-21 14:36:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-21 14:36:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 436 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:36:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-21 14:36:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-21 14:36:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7531399449071307499.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:36:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4450361013251926538.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7531399449071307499.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4450361013251926538.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09705e+07,1.83324,45228,2,6184,5,144776,6,0,1818,202394,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((A(A(A((((p38==1)&&(p173==1))&&(p321==1)) U (p322==1)) U ((p42!=1)&&(p239!=1))) U E((p27==1) U ((p6==1)||(p33==1)))) + ((AX(EX(E((p241=...261
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(EX(E((p278==1) U ((p260==1)&&(p425==1))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(EX(E((p278==1) U ((p260=...665
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t16, t52, t61, t95, t97, t98, t132, t134, t151, t170, t199, t200, t233, t234, t235, t236, t25...312
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-21 14:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-21 14:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14884296118216409403.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14884296118216409403.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14884296118216409403.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14884296118216409403.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14884296118216409403.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-21 14:37:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-21 14:37:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-21 14:37:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 342 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:37:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5289344642911206802.gal : 6 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16805310304064650495.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5289344642911206802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16805310304064650495.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09705e+07,0.224014,7372,640,18,5964,316,639,6734,57,647,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((A(A(A((((i2.i0.u12.p38==1)&&(i10.i0.u55.p173==1))&&(i17.i2.u100.p321==1)) U (i17.i2.u100.p322==1)) U ((i2.i0.u13.p42!=1)&&(i13.u80.p23...437
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(EX(E((i15.i0.u86.p278==1) U ((i14.i0.u81.p260==1)&&(i23.i1.u129.p425==1))))))))))) * !(E...1019
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t52, t97, t98, t132, t134, t200, t234, t235, t236, t297, t298, t335, t336, t353, t354, t356, ...380
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
(forward)formula 0,0,25.2109,627852,1,0,1.18891e+06,479,5553,1.86582e+06,288,1120,2252039
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 384 edges and 378 vertex of which 55 / 378 are part of one of the 9 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 46 places
Ensure Unique test removed 52 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 52 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 236 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 236 transitions
Performed 236 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 236
Iterating post reduction 0 with 236 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 331 transition count 180
Reduce places removed 236 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 242 rules applied. Total rules applied 479 place count 95 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 483 place count 92 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 484 place count 91 transition count 173
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 484 place count 91 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 504 place count 81 transition count 163
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 515 place count 70 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 526 place count 70 transition count 150
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 527 place count 70 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 528 place count 69 transition count 149
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 528 place count 69 transition count 147
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 532 place count 67 transition count 147
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 535 place count 64 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 538 place count 64 transition count 134
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 539 place count 64 transition count 133
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 541 place count 62 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 543 place count 62 transition count 129
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 559 place count 54 transition count 121
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 568 place count 45 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 7 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 577 place count 45 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 583 place count 45 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 584 place count 44 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 585 place count 44 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 586 place count 43 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 587 place count 43 transition count 75
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 590 place count 43 transition count 72
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 596 place count 40 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 597 place count 39 transition count 68
Applied a total of 597 rules in 100 ms. Remains 39 /378 variables (removed 339) and now considering 68/469 (removed 401) transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:37:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 39 cols
[2023-03-21 14:37:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:37:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2023-03-21 14:37:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 86 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/378 places, 68/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 315 ms. Remains : 39/378 places, 68/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7858964985430436794.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5577031554387181305.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7858964985430436794.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5577031554387181305.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1265 resets, run finished after 61 ms. (steps per millisecond=163 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5577031554387181305.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 6
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 209 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=714 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :6 after 49
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :49 after 128
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :128 after 616
Finished probabilistic random walk after 1793 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=119 )
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
Probabilistic random walk after 1793 steps, saw 781 distinct states, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=112 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
ITS runner failed with exception null
java.lang.InterruptedException
at java.base/java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1304)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1372)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.AbstractRunner.join(AbstractRunner.java:27)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner.join(ITSRunner.java:177)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.global.GlobalPropertySolver.verifyWithSDD(GlobalPropertySolver.java:675)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.ReachabilitySolver.lambda$2(ReachabilitySolver.java:63)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
SDD size :616 after 973
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 355 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 355 transition count 446
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 342 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 342 transition count 433
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 338 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 338 transition count 429
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :973 after 2264
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,2810,0.083369,4484,2,621,11,3523,7,0,219,3645,0
Total reachable state count : 2810
Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Reachability property StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-07 is true.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-07,144,0.084298,4484,2,136,11,3523,7,0,221,3645,0
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 336 transition count 427
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 336 transition count 427
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Applied a total of 84 rules in 42 ms. Remains 336 /378 variables (removed 42) and now considering 427/469 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 427 rows 336 cols
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 6 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 408 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 575 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:37:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:37:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 430 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 336/378 places, 427/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1051 ms. Remains : 336/378 places, 427/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:37:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 427 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:37:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2564568616431096239.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:37:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5041751974132640451.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2564568616431096239.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5041751974132640451.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05015e+07,2.44052,52916,2,6188,5,162246,6,0,1773,245336,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((AX(AX((p225==0))) + (AX((p136==0)) * (p253==0))) + (((p405==0)&&(p404==0))&&(p289==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((!(EX(!(!(EX(!((p225==0))))))) + (!(EX(!((p136==0)))) * (p253==0))) + (((p405==0)&&(p404==0))&&...178
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t60, t94, t95, t96, t130, t131, t133, t150, t159, t193, t194, t195, t228, t229, t231, t2...319
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-21 14:38:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-21 14:38:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9158374952463610434.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9158374952463610434.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9158374952463610434.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9158374952463610434.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9158374952463610434.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-21 14:38:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-21 14:38:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-21 14:38:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 338 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:38:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:38:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17776368881396543076.gal : 10 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11842339558576642987.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17776368881396543076.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11842339558576642987.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05015e+07,0.133579,7172,646,18,5771,330,574,6505,57,680,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((AX(AX((i13.u69.p225==0))) + (AX((i14.u1.p136==0)) * (i12.u78.p253==0))) + (((i14.u123.p405==0)&&(i14.u122.p404==0))&&(i15.u85.p28...164
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((!(EX(!(!(EX(!((i13.u69.p225==0))))))) + (!(EX(!((i14.u1.p136==0)))) * (i12.u78.p253==0))) + ((...227
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t96, t130, t131, t133, t194, t195, t229, t231, t292, t325, t326, t328, t345, t346, t348, i1.t...409
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
(forward)formula 0,1,6.46843,182204,1,0,349809,342,4130,619709,260,834,679066
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 355 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 355 transition count 446
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 341 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 341 transition count 432
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 338 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 338 transition count 429
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 336 transition count 427
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 336 transition count 427
Applied a total of 84 rules in 53 ms. Remains 336 /378 variables (removed 42) and now considering 427/469 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 427 rows 336 cols
[2023-03-21 14:38:11] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 229 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:38:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:38:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 262 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 520 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:38:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:38:12] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 312 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 336/378 places, 427/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 897 ms. Remains : 336/378 places, 427/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:38:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 427 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:38:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5021327188803437241.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6595123732630866671.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5021327188803437241.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6595123732630866671.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04807e+07,2.09147,52548,2,6770,5,163722,6,0,1773,240505,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AG(((AG(((p342==1)&&(p410==1))) + (p391==1)) + ((p30==0)&&(p243==0)))) + AG((p225==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(E(TRUE U !(((p342==1)&&(p410==1))))) + (p391==1)) + ((p30==0)&&(p243==0)))))))] !...215
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t60, t94, t95, t96, t129, t130, t132, t149, t159, t194, t195, t228, t229, t231, t247, t2...313
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-21 14:38:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-21 14:38:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11492815473757962755.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11492815473757962755.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11492815473757962755.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11492815473757962755.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11492815473757962755.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-21 14:38:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-21 14:38:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-21 14:38:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 344 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:38:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:38:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14716932750783298447.gal : 4 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13952893522981412569.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14716932750783298447.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13952893522981412569.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04807e+07,0.171174,8376,701,19,8081,346,647,9332,59,671,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AG(((AG(((i20.i0.u105.p342==1)&&(i25.i1.u127.p410==1))) + (i22.i1.u85.p391==1)) + ((i2.i1.u9.p30==0)&&(i11.i0.u77.p243==0)))) + AG((i...176
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(E(TRUE U !(((i20.i0.u105.p342==1)&&(i25.i1.u127.p410==1))))) + (i22.i1.u85.p391==...281
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t95, t96, t130, t132, t149, t194, t195, t228, t231, t247, t292, t325, t326, t328, t345, ...373
(forward)formula 0,0,1.63449,44280,1,0,80411,359,4554,110660,259,671,363599
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 332 edges and 378 vertex of which 29 / 378 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 24 places
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 27 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 202 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 202 transitions
Performed 202 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 202
Iterating post reduction 0 with 202 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 353 transition count 239
Reduce places removed 202 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 213 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 151 transition count 228
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 441 place count 145 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 460 place count 126 transition count 209
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 460 place count 126 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 480 place count 116 transition count 199
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 490 place count 106 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 500 place count 106 transition count 188
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 500 place count 106 transition count 186
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 504 place count 104 transition count 186
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 505 place count 103 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 506 place count 103 transition count 184
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 520 place count 96 transition count 177
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 524 place count 92 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 528 place count 92 transition count 157
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 530 place count 92 transition count 155
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 533 place count 92 transition count 152
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 537 place count 90 transition count 150
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 538 place count 89 transition count 149
Applied a total of 538 rules in 56 ms. Remains 89 /378 variables (removed 289) and now considering 149/469 (removed 320) transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 147 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 147 rows 89 cols
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 147 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 147 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 94 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/378 places, 149/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 338 ms. Remains : 89/378 places, 149/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 149 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3508784833447056298.gal : 14 ms
[2023-03-21 14:38:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17642500722142143984.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3508784833447056298.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17642500722142143984.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,58908,0.144406,7900,2,1586,5,13732,6,0,501,14931,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(((p356!=1)||(p163!=1)) U A(E(AG((p198==1)) U A((p155==1) U (p203==1))) U ((E((p237==1) U (p181==1)) + AF((p246==1))) + (p132==1)))) U...423
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((E((((p85==1)&&(p233==1))&&(p343==1)) U (((p98==1)&&(p208==1))&&(p355==1))) * E(E(TRUE U ((p72...1481
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t7, t8, t29, t38, t46, t66, t72, t76, t89, t115, t122, t123, t124, t125, t140, t141, ...285
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,15.5485,377812,1,0,1530,2.60231e+06,382,800,3706,1.78194e+06,1849
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 356 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 356 transition count 447
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 342 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 342 transition count 433
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 338 transition count 429
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 338 transition count 429
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 336 transition count 427
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 336 transition count 427
Applied a total of 84 rules in 33 ms. Remains 336 /378 variables (removed 42) and now considering 427/469 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 427 rows 336 cols
[2023-03-21 14:39:00] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 12 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 171 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:39:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:39:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 248 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 465 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:39:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:39:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 478 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 336/378 places, 427/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1002 ms. Remains : 336/378 places, 427/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:39:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 427 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:39:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17802711251881035725.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10466777603868814037.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17802711251881035725.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10466777603868814037.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05015e+07,2.65372,58712,2,6400,5,172626,6,0,1773,273992,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((EG((((p85==0)||(p220==0))||(p368==0))) * ((p260==0)||(p425==0))) * (p307==0))) + !(A(A((p221!=1) U ((EX((p217==1)) + (p121==1)) + (...193
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY((Init * !(!(!((E(!((p421!=1)) U (!(!((E(!(((EX((p217==1)) + (p121==1)) + ((p388==1)&&(p318==1)))) U (!((p...1037
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t60, t94, t95, t96, t109, t130, t131, t133, t150, t159, t193, t194, t195, t228, t229, t2...325
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-21 14:39:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-21 14:39:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3802103359288378942.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3802103359288378942.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3802103359288378942.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3802103359288378942.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3802103359288378942.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-21 14:39:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-21 14:39:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-21 14:39:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 309 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:39:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:39:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13325326433535081395.gal : 7 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6501346711097149890.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13325326433535081395.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6501346711097149890.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05015e+07,0.288983,8312,653,24,7993,608,700,9929,59,1403,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((EG((((i5.u25.p85==0)||(i13.i0.u64.p220==0))||(i11.i2.u107.p368==0))) * ((i15.u76.p260==0)||(i23.i1.u119.p425==0))) * (i18.i0.u87.p3...318
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY((Init * !(!(!((E(!((i23.i1.u121.p421!=1)) U (!(!((E(!(((EX((i12.i1.u63.p217==1)) + (i11.i0.u2.p121==1)) +...1608
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t109, t131, t133, t150, t229, t231, t247, t290, t292, t326, t328, t345, t346, t348, i0.i...402
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
(forward)formula 0,1,14.2993,357584,1,0,697097,608,5306,1.10479e+06,306,1442,1543732
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 361 transition count 452
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 361 transition count 452
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 350 transition count 441
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 350 transition count 441
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 347 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 347 transition count 438
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 346 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 346 transition count 437
Applied a total of 64 rules in 25 ms. Remains 346 /378 variables (removed 32) and now considering 437/469 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 437 rows 346 cols
[2023-03-21 14:39:45] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 313 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 439 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 469 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 346/378 places, 437/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 944 ms. Remains : 346/378 places, 437/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 437 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13971441397595935590.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:39:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13623918288159495462.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13971441397595935590.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13623918288159495462.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.14439e+07,3.25389,70344,2,9008,5,208248,6,0,1823,347759,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG(((!(A((p87==1) U (p391==1))) * EX((p79==0))) + (((((p98==0)||(p208==0))||(p368==0))&&(p286==0))&&(p336==0))))) * ((EF((((p51==1)&&...505
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((!(!((E(!((p391==1)) U (!((p87==1)) * !((p391==1)))) + EG(!((p391==1)))))) * ...1432
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, t27, t53, t54, t63, t98, t99, t100, t133, t134, t135, t136, t137, t153, t162, t197, t198...347
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-21 14:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-21 14:40:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-21 14:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17069390032647460667.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17069390032647460667.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17069390032647460667.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17069390032647460667.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17069390032647460667.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-21 14:40:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-21 14:40:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-21 14:40:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 325 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-21 14:40:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:40:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability960462314203103617.gal : 5 ms
[2023-03-21 14:40:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17035824537781850342.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability960462314203103617.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17035824537781850342.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.14439e+07,0.1426,7728,777,24,6714,450,639,7982,63,872,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG(((!(A((i5.u29.p87==1) U (i11.i1.i1.u84.p391==1))) * EX((i4.u26.p79==0))) + (((((i9.u33.p98==0)||(i12.u64.p208==0))||(i11.i1.i1.u11...790
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((!(!((E(!((i11.i1.i1.u84.p391==1)) U (!((i5.u29.p87==1)) * !((i11.i1.i1.u84.p...2094
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t54, t100, t133, t134, t136, t153, t199, t232, t233, t235, t301, t302, t336, t338, t356, t358...457
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
(forward)formula 0,1,17.0085,451512,1,0,856927,470,5726,1.58212e+06,347,1110,1656570
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 356 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 356 transition count 447
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 343 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 343 transition count 434
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 339 transition count 430
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 339 transition count 430
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 337 transition count 428
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 337 transition count 428
Applied a total of 82 rules in 28 ms. Remains 337 /378 variables (removed 41) and now considering 428/469 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 428 rows 337 cols
[2023-03-21 14:40:34] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-21 14:40:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 147 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:40:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:40:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 417 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 566 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:40:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:40:35] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 312 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 337/378 places, 428/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 907 ms. Remains : 337/378 places, 428/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:40:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-21 14:40:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-21 14:40:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 428 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:40:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-21 14:40:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-21 14:40:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1865497282644156186.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-21 14:40:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2314268848641017754.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1865497282644156186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2314268848641017754.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05662e+07,1.81984,52724,2,6532,5,161452,6,0,1778,242125,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!((EG(EF((((p85==1)&&(p220==1))&&(p355==1)))) * EF(AX((p251==1))))) U E(E(EF((p288==1)) U EF((p156==1))) U !(((((p26==1)&&(p186==1))&...195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!((EG(E(TRUE U (((p85==1)&&(p220==1))&&(p355==1)))) * E(TRUE U !(EX(!((p251==1)))))))),E(E(TRUE...268
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t60, t94, t95, t96, t131, t132, t134, t151, t160, t194, t195, t196, t229, t230, t232, t2...319
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-21 14:41:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-21 14:41:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7841460810941490512.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7841460810941490512.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7841460810941490512.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7841460810941490512.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7841460810941490512.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-21 14:41:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-21 14:41:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-21 14:41:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 331 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:41:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-03-21 14:41:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7208900107916660638.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17145002276650668407.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7208900107916660638.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17145002276650668407.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05662e+07,0.175338,8080,669,20,7124,414,663,7999,66,893,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!((EG(EF((((i5.i0.u26.p85==1)&&(i13.i0.u64.p220==1))&&(i22.i0.u105.p355==1)))) * EF(AX((i14.i1.u73.p251==1))))) U E(E(EF((i16.i0.u81....313
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!((EG(E(TRUE U (((i5.i0.u26.p85==1)&&(i13.i0.u64.p220==1))&&(i22.i0.u105.p355==1)))) * E(TRUE U...386
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t95, t96, t132, t134, t151, t196, t229, t230, t232, t293, t326, t327, t329, t346, t347, ...386
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
(forward)formula 0,0,6.57618,188392,1,0,375510,435,5158,605844,307,1170,910911
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 384 edges and 378 vertex of which 55 / 378 are part of one of the 9 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 46 places
Ensure Unique test removed 52 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 52 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 237 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 237 transitions
Performed 237 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 237
Iterating post reduction 0 with 237 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 331 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 237 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 243 rules applied. Total rules applied 481 place count 94 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 485 place count 91 transition count 172
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 90 transition count 172
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 90 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 504 place count 81 transition count 163
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 516 place count 69 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 528 place count 69 transition count 149
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 529 place count 69 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 530 place count 68 transition count 148
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 530 place count 68 transition count 146
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 534 place count 66 transition count 146
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 538 place count 62 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 542 place count 62 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 543 place count 62 transition count 131
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 545 place count 60 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 547 place count 60 transition count 127
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 563 place count 52 transition count 119
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 572 place count 43 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 7 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 581 place count 43 transition count 82
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 586 place count 43 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 587 place count 42 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 588 place count 42 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 589 place count 41 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 590 place count 41 transition count 74
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 593 place count 41 transition count 71
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 599 place count 38 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 600 place count 37 transition count 67
Applied a total of 600 rules in 40 ms. Remains 37 /378 variables (removed 341) and now considering 67/469 (removed 402) transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:41:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 37 cols
[2023-03-21 14:41:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 66 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/378 places, 67/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 248 ms. Remains : 37/378 places, 67/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1189550519443325915.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4310889851207568803.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1189550519443325915.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4310889851207568803.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2636,0.032816,4204,2,655,5,3320,6,0,209,3379,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(EG((p48==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EG((p48==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t7, t8, t10, t11, t17, t28, t29, t30, t44, t45, t46, t52, t60, t61, t62, t63, Inters...246
(forward)formula 0,0,0.612231,16328,1,0,206,70787,156,88,1615,53230,233
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 469/469 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 384 edges and 378 vertex of which 55 / 378 are part of one of the 9 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 46 places
Ensure Unique test removed 52 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 52 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 236 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 236 transitions
Performed 236 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 236
Iterating post reduction 0 with 236 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 331 transition count 180
Reduce places removed 236 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 242 rules applied. Total rules applied 479 place count 95 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 483 place count 92 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 484 place count 91 transition count 173
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 484 place count 91 transition count 164
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 502 place count 82 transition count 164
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 514 place count 70 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 526 place count 70 transition count 150
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 527 place count 70 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 528 place count 69 transition count 149
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 528 place count 69 transition count 147
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 532 place count 67 transition count 147
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 536 place count 63 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 540 place count 63 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 541 place count 63 transition count 132
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 543 place count 61 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 545 place count 61 transition count 128
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 561 place count 53 transition count 120
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 570 place count 44 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 7 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 579 place count 44 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 585 place count 44 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 586 place count 43 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 587 place count 43 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 588 place count 42 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 589 place count 42 transition count 74
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 592 place count 42 transition count 71
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 598 place count 39 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 599 place count 38 transition count 67
Applied a total of 599 rules in 35 ms. Remains 38 /378 variables (removed 340) and now considering 67/469 (removed 402) transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 38 cols
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:41:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 52 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/378 places, 67/469 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 268 ms. Remains : 38/378 places, 67/469 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3164247783106683413.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14145229732248795917.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3164247783106683413.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14145229732248795917.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2712,0.037228,4468,2,731,5,4192,6,0,213,4127,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p116==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p116==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t7, t8, t12, t17, t27, t28, t29, t30, t44, t45, t46, t52, t60, t61, t62, t63, Inters...246
(forward)formula 0,1,0.323917,11596,1,0,137,43981,150,60,1591,31258,142
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03b-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-21 14:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Total runtime 528169 ms.
BK_STOP 1679409674595
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyElection-PT-03b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyElection-PT-03b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r453-smll-167912645600578"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyElection-PT-03b.tgz
mv StigmergyElection-PT-03b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;