fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r426-tajo-167905978600186
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of Marcie+red for ShieldRVt-PT-001B

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
5481.876 11449.00 20008.00 85.50 FTFFTTFFTTTFTTTT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r426-tajo-167905978600186.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool marciexred
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-001B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r426-tajo-167905978600186
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 448K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K Feb 25 23:13 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K Feb 25 23:13 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Feb 25 23:12 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K Feb 25 23:12 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Jan 29 11:41 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Jan 29 11:41 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Feb 25 17:03 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Feb 25 17:03 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Feb 25 17:03 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Feb 25 17:03 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K Feb 25 23:15 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 101K Feb 25 23:15 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.8K Feb 25 23:14 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K Feb 25 23:14 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Feb 25 17:03 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Feb 25 17:03 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 Mar 5 18:23 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Mar 5 18:23 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1679346120695

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=marciexred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-001B
Applying reductions before tool marcie
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-20 21:02:02] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2023-03-20 21:02:02] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 54 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Transformed 53 places.
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Transformed 53 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 53 places and 53 transitions and 124 arcs in 153 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 8 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 48 out of 53 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 53/53 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 52 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 52 transition count 52
Applied a total of 2 rules in 16 ms. Remains 52 /53 variables (removed 1) and now considering 52/53 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 52 cols
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned []
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 269 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 57 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/53 places, 52/53 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 356 ms. Remains : 52/53 places, 52/53 transitions.
Support contains 48 out of 52 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 335 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 ) properties (out of 51) seen :41
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 34 ms. (steps per millisecond=294 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 35 ms. (steps per millisecond=285 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=833 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 47 ms. (steps per millisecond=212 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=416 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 12 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=476 ) properties (out of 10) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=434 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=833 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 65 ms. (steps per millisecond=153 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=1250 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 9 properties.
[2023-03-20 21:02:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-20 21:02:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2023-03-20 21:02:04] [INFO ] After 288ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :2 sat :0 real:7
[2023-03-20 21:02:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2023-03-20 21:02:04] [INFO ] After 29ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :6 sat :3
[2023-03-20 21:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-20 21:02:04] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 82 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 137 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] After 281ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :7 sat :2
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 21 ms.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] After 492ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :7 sat :2
Fused 9 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 52 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 52 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 39 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 38 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 37 transition count 36
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 37 transition count 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 35 transition count 34
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 34 transition count 33
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 34 transition count 33
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 25 transition count 24
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 24 transition count 24
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 24 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 22 transition count 22
Applied a total of 61 rules in 21 ms. Remains 22 /52 variables (removed 30) and now considering 22/52 (removed 30) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 22/52 places, 22/52 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 48 ms. (steps per millisecond=208 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=500 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=357 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 211 states, properties seen :1
Probabilistic random walk after 784 steps, saw 211 distinct states, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=65 ) properties seen :1
Explored full state space saw : 211 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 784 steps, saw 211 distinct states, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=392 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 8 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
Support contains 39 out of 52 places (down from 41) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 16 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 42 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 42 transition count 42
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 41 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 41 transition count 41
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 40 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 40 transition count 40
Applied a total of 24 rules in 4 ms. Remains 40 /52 variables (removed 12) and now considering 40/52 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 40/52 places, 40/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 42 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 42 transition count 42
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 41 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 41 transition count 41
Applied a total of 22 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /52 variables (removed 11) and now considering 41/52 (removed 11) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 41/52 places, 41/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 44 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 44 transition count 44
Applied a total of 16 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /52 variables (removed 8) and now considering 44/52 (removed 8) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 44/52 places, 44/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 47 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 47 transition count 47
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 46 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 46 transition count 46
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /52 variables (removed 6) and now considering 46/52 (removed 6) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 46/52 places, 46/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 42 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 42 transition count 42
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 41 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 41 transition count 41
Applied a total of 22 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /52 variables (removed 11) and now considering 41/52 (removed 11) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 41/52 places, 41/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 42 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 42 transition count 42
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 41 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 41 transition count 41
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 40 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 40 transition count 40
Applied a total of 24 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /52 variables (removed 12) and now considering 40/52 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 40/52 places, 40/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 45 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 45 transition count 45
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /52 variables (removed 7) and now considering 45/52 (removed 7) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 45/52 places, 45/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 44 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 44 transition count 44
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 43 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 43 transition count 43
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 42 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 42 transition count 42
Applied a total of 20 rules in 3 ms. Remains 42 /52 variables (removed 10) and now considering 42/52 (removed 10) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 42/52 places, 42/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 45 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 45 transition count 45
Applied a total of 14 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /52 variables (removed 7) and now considering 45/52 (removed 7) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 45/52 places, 45/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 43 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 43 transition count 43
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 42 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 42 transition count 42
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 41 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 41 transition count 41
Applied a total of 22 rules in 3 ms. Remains 41 /52 variables (removed 11) and now considering 41/52 (removed 11) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 41/52 places, 41/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 42 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 42 transition count 42
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 41 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 41 transition count 41
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 40 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 40 transition count 40
Applied a total of 24 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /52 variables (removed 12) and now considering 40/52 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 40/52 places, 40/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 42 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 42 transition count 42
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 41 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 41 transition count 41
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 40 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 40 transition count 40
Applied a total of 24 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /52 variables (removed 12) and now considering 40/52 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 40/52 places, 40/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 44 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 44 transition count 44
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 43 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 43 transition count 43
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 42 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 42 transition count 42
Applied a total of 20 rules in 4 ms. Remains 42 /52 variables (removed 10) and now considering 42/52 (removed 10) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 42/52 places, 42/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 52/52 places, 52/52 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 51 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 42 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 41 transition count 41
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 41 transition count 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 36 transition count 36
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 30 transition count 30
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 30 transition count 30
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 30 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 29 transition count 29
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 23 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 22 transition count 22
Applied a total of 57 rules in 8 ms. Remains 22 /52 variables (removed 30) and now considering 22/52 (removed 30) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 22/52 places, 22/52 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 14 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 2 ms.
[2023-03-20 21:02:05] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 52 places, 52 transitions and 122 arcs took 1 ms.
Total runtime 2902 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
timeout --kill-after=10s --signal=SIGINT 1m for testing only

Marcie built on Linux at 2019-11-18.
A model checker for Generalized Stochastic Petri nets

authors: Alex Tovchigrechko (IDD package and CTL model checking)

Martin Schwarick (Symbolic numerical analysis and CSL model checking)

Christian Rohr (Simulative and approximative numerical model checking)

marcie@informatik.tu-cottbus.de

called as: /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../marcie/bin/marcie --net-file=model.pnml --mcc-file=CTLFireability.xml --memory=6 --mcc-mode

parse successfull
net created successfully

Net: Petri
(NrP: 52 NrTr: 52 NrArc: 122)

parse formulas
formulas created successfully
place and transition orderings generation:0m 0.000sec

net check time: 0m 0.000sec

init dd package: 0m 3.210sec


RS generation: 0m 0.009sec


-> reachability set: #nodes 739 (7.4e+02) #states 20,511 (4)



starting MCC model checker
--------------------------

checking: AX [1<=0]
normalized: ~ [EX [~ [1<=0]]]

abstracting: (1<=0)
states: 0
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.042sec

checking: EX [EG [[p4<=1 & 1<=p4]]]
normalized: EX [EG [[p4<=1 & 1<=p4]]]

abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 1
abstracting: (p4<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
..
EG iterations: 2
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.001sec

checking: ~ [E [EF [AG [EX [[p48<=1 & 1<=p48]]]] U [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]
normalized: ~ [E [E [true U ~ [E [true U ~ [EX [[p48<=1 & 1<=p48]]]]]] U [p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]

abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 1,079 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p48)
states: 2,626 (3)
abstracting: (p48<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.011sec

checking: EF [AX [[[p15<=1 & 1<=p15] & [p29<=1 & 1<=p29]]]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [EX [~ [[[p29<=1 & 1<=p29] & [p15<=1 & 1<=p15]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 1,981 (3)
abstracting: (p15<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p29)
states: 1,703 (3)
abstracting: (p29<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.016sec

checking: EX [EG [[[p41<=1 & 1<=p41] | AF [EX [[p32<=1 & 1<=p32]]]]]]
normalized: EX [EG [[~ [EG [~ [EX [[p32<=1 & 1<=p32]]]]] | [p41<=1 & 1<=p41]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 51
abstracting: (p41<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p32)
states: 2,441 (3)
abstracting: (p32<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.....................................................................
EG iterations: 68
.
EG iterations: 1
.-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.221sec

checking: A [[p29<=1 & 1<=p29] U ~ [AX [[p25<=1 & 1<=p25]]]]
normalized: [~ [EG [~ [EX [~ [[p25<=1 & 1<=p25]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [EX [~ [[p25<=1 & 1<=p25]]]] U [~ [[p29<=1 & 1<=p29]] & ~ [EX [~ [[p25<=1 & 1<=p25]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,220 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p29)
states: 1,703 (3)
abstracting: (p29<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,220 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,220 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
...
EG iterations: 2
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.002sec

checking: [AF [[p49<=1 & 1<=p49]] | EX [[[EX [0<=0] & [p33<=0 & 0<=p33]] | [p44<=0 & 0<=p44]]]]
normalized: [EX [[[p44<=0 & 0<=p44] | [[p33<=0 & 0<=p33] & EX [0<=0]]]] | ~ [EG [~ [[p49<=1 & 1<=p49]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p49)
states: 2,626 (3)
abstracting: (p49<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
...........................................................
EG iterations: 59
abstracting: (0<=0)
states: 20,511 (4)
.abstracting: (0<=p33)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (p33<=0)
states: 18,410 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p44)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (p44<=0)
states: 17,885 (4)
.-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.134sec

checking: AG [[EX [[p24<=0 & 0<=p24]] & [AF [[p28<=0 & 0<=p28]] | [[p11<=1 & 1<=p11] | AG [[p7<=0 & 0<=p7]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[EX [[p24<=0 & 0<=p24]] & [[~ [E [true U ~ [[p7<=0 & 0<=p7]]]] | [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]] | ~ [EG [~ [[p28<=0 & 0<=p28]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (0<=p28)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (p28<=0)
states: 18,808 (4)
................
EG iterations: 16
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 1,981 (3)
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p7)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (p7<=0)
states: 20,395 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p24)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (p24<=0)
states: 18,291 (4)
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.014sec

checking: AG [E [~ [EX [[AG [[p14<=1 & 1<=p14]] | [[p45<=1 & 1<=p45] & [p37<=1 & 1<=p37]]]]] U ~ [AX [[p10<=1 & 1<=p10]]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [E [~ [EX [[[[p37<=1 & 1<=p37] & [p45<=1 & 1<=p45]] | ~ [E [true U ~ [[p14<=1 & 1<=p14]]]]]]] U EX [~ [[p10<=1 & 1<=p10]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 1,981 (3)
abstracting: (p10<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 1,981 (3)
abstracting: (p14<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p45)
states: 1,886 (3)
abstracting: (p45<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 2,441 (3)
abstracting: (p37<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.007sec

checking: EF [[~ [A [AF [[p7<=1 & 1<=p7]] U [AX [[p8<=1 & 1<=p8]] | ~ [[[p20<=1 & 1<=p20] | [p47<=1 & 1<=p47]]]]]] & [p25<=1 & 1<=p25]]]
normalized: E [true U [[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & ~ [[~ [EG [~ [[~ [[[p47<=1 & 1<=p47] | [p20<=1 & 1<=p20]]] | ~ [EX [~ [[p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[~ [[[p47<=1 & 1<=p47] | [p20<=1 & 1<=p20]]] | ~ [EX [~ [[p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]]] U [EG [~ [[p7<=1 & 1<=p7]]] & ~ [[~ [[[p47<=1 & 1<=p47] | [p20<=1 & 1<=p20]]] | ~ [EX [~ [[p8<=1 & 1<=p8]]]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 1,079 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p20)
states: 1,703 (3)
abstracting: (p20<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 2,626 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p7)
states: 116
abstracting: (p7<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.......
EG iterations: 7
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 1,079 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p20)
states: 1,703 (3)
abstracting: (p20<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 2,626 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 1,079 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p20)
states: 1,703 (3)
abstracting: (p20<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 2,626 (3)
abstracting: (p47<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
..............................
EG iterations: 30
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,220 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.042sec

checking: EF [[[p35<=1 & 1<=p35] & [[[p17<=0 & 0<=p17] | [p23<=0 & 0<=p23]] | [[p39<=0 & 0<=p39] | [[p11<=1 & 1<=p11] | [[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & ~ [A [[p16<=1 & 1<=p16] U [p13<=1 & 1<=p13]]]]]]]]]
normalized: E [true U [[[[[~ [[~ [EG [~ [[p13<=1 & 1<=p13]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[p13<=1 & 1<=p13]] U [~ [[p16<=1 & 1<=p16]] & ~ [[p13<=1 & 1<=p13]]]]]]] & [p25<=1 & 1<=p25]] | [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]] | [p39<=0 & 0<=p39]] | [[p23<=0 & 0<=p23] | [p17<=0 & 0<=p17]]] & [p35<=1 & 1<=p35]]]

abstracting: (1<=p35)
states: 2,441 (3)
abstracting: (p35<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p17)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (p17<=0)
states: 18,486 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p23)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (p23<=0)
states: 18,291 (4)
abstracting: (0<=p39)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (p39<=0)
states: 18,036 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 1,981 (3)
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,220 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 1,981 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 1,934 (3)
abstracting: (p16<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 1,981 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p13)
states: 1,981 (3)
abstracting: (p13<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.039sec

checking: EX [E [~ [[p25<=1 & 1<=p25]] U EG [[[[[[p8<=1 & 1<=p8] & [p32<=1 & 1<=p32]] | [p40<=1 & 1<=p40]] | [p51<=1 & 1<=p51]] & [[p16<=1 & 1<=p16] | [[p26<=1 & 1<=p26] | [[p0<=1 & 1<=p0] & [p31<=1 & 1<=p31]]]]]]]]
normalized: EX [E [~ [[p25<=1 & 1<=p25]] U EG [[[[p51<=1 & 1<=p51] | [[[p8<=1 & 1<=p8] & [p32<=1 & 1<=p32]] | [p40<=1 & 1<=p40]]] & [[[p26<=1 & 1<=p26] | [[p31<=1 & 1<=p31] & [p0<=1 & 1<=p0]]] | [p16<=1 & 1<=p16]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 1,934 (3)
abstracting: (p16<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 1
abstracting: (p0<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 1,154 (3)
abstracting: (p31<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p26)
states: 2,220 (3)
abstracting: (p26<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p40)
states: 51
abstracting: (p40<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p32)
states: 2,441 (3)
abstracting: (p32<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p8)
states: 1,079 (3)
abstracting: (p8<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p51)
states: 69
abstracting: (p51<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
......
EG iterations: 6
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,220 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.004sec

checking: A [[~ [[[p15<=1 & 1<=p15] | [[EF [[p5<=1 & 1<=p5]] & AG [[p19<=1 & 1<=p19]]] | AG [[p51<=1 & 1<=p51]]]]] & EX [[EG [[p51<=1 & 1<=p51]] | E [[[p1<=1 & 1<=p1] & [p34<=1 & 1<=p34]] U [p40<=1 & 1<=p40]]]]] U EF [EX [[p22<=1 & 1<=p22]]]]
normalized: [~ [EG [~ [E [true U EX [[p22<=1 & 1<=p22]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [E [true U EX [[p22<=1 & 1<=p22]]]] U [~ [[EX [[E [[[p34<=1 & 1<=p34] & [p1<=1 & 1<=p1]] U [p40<=1 & 1<=p40]] | EG [[p51<=1 & 1<=p51]]]] & ~ [[[~ [E [true U ~ [[p51<=1 & 1<=p51]]]] | [~ [E [true U ~ [[p19<=1 & 1<=p19]]]] & E [true U [p5<=1 & 1<=p5]]]] | [p15<=1 & 1<=p15]]]]] & ~ [E [true U EX [[p22<=1 & 1<=p22]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 1,856 (3)
abstracting: (p22<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 1,981 (3)
abstracting: (p15<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 1
abstracting: (p5<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 1,079 (3)
abstracting: (p19<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p51)
states: 69
abstracting: (p51<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p51)
states: 69
abstracting: (p51<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.............
EG iterations: 13
abstracting: (1<=p40)
states: 51
abstracting: (p40<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 7,460 (3)
abstracting: (p1<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p34)
states: 2,441 (3)
abstracting: (p34<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 1,856 (3)
abstracting: (p22<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
.abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 1,856 (3)
abstracting: (p22<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
..
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.024sec

checking: E [~ [[[AX [A [[p42<=1 & 1<=p42] U [p36<=1 & 1<=p36]]] | [p40<=1 & 1<=p40]] & E [AG [[[p25<=1 & 1<=p25] & [[p1<=1 & 1<=p1] & [p34<=1 & 1<=p34]]]] U EG [[p14<=1 & 1<=p14]]]]] U [AG [[[p11<=1 & 1<=p11] | [p31<=1 & 1<=p31]]] & [[p36<=1 & 1<=p36] & [p19<=1 & 1<=p19]]]]
normalized: E [~ [[E [~ [E [true U ~ [[[[p34<=1 & 1<=p34] & [p1<=1 & 1<=p1]] & [p25<=1 & 1<=p25]]]]] U EG [[p14<=1 & 1<=p14]]] & [[p40<=1 & 1<=p40] | ~ [EX [~ [[~ [EG [~ [[p36<=1 & 1<=p36]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[p36<=1 & 1<=p36]] U [~ [[p42<=1 & 1<=p42]] & ~ [[p36<=1 & 1<=p36]]]]]]]]]]]] U [[[p19<=1 & 1<=p19] & [p36<=1 & 1<=p36]] & ~ [E [true U ~ [[[p31<=1 & 1<=p31] | [p11<=1 & 1<=p11]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 1,981 (3)
abstracting: (p11<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 1,154 (3)
abstracting: (p31<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 2,441 (3)
abstracting: (p36<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 1,079 (3)
abstracting: (p19<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 2,441 (3)
abstracting: (p36<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p42)
states: 69
abstracting: (p42<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 2,441 (3)
abstracting: (p36<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 2,441 (3)
abstracting: (p36<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
....................................................................
EG iterations: 68
.abstracting: (1<=p40)
states: 51
abstracting: (p40<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p14)
states: 1,981 (3)
abstracting: (p14<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
...............
EG iterations: 15
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 2,220 (3)
abstracting: (p25<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 7,460 (3)
abstracting: (p1<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
abstracting: (1<=p34)
states: 2,441 (3)
abstracting: (p34<=1)
states: 20,511 (4)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-001B-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.175sec

totally nodes used: 595248 (6.0e+05)
number of garbage collections: 0
fire ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 704476 1630970 2335446
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 2220720 64888144 16 1024MB
basic ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 126567 246244 372811
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 496542 16280674 12 192MB
unary ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 8 128MB
abstract ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 12 192MB
state nr cache: hits/miss/sum: 2487 6474 8961
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 6474 8382134 32 256MB
max state cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 8388608 32 256MB
uniqueHash elements/entry size/size: 67108864 4 256MB
0 66546196
1 533260
2 26481
3 2693
4 223
5 11
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
>= 10 0

Total processing time: 0m 6.170sec


BK_STOP 1679346132144

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
++ sed s/.jar//
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
check for maximal unmarked siphon
ok
check for constant places
ok
check if there are places and transitions
ok
check if there are transitions without pre-places
ok
check if at least one transition is enabled in m0
ok
check if there are transitions that can never fire
ok


initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:967 (18), effective:177 (3)

initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:99 (1), effective:17 (0)

iterations count:52 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:777 (14), effective:137 (2)

iterations count:52 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:70 (1), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:777 (14), effective:137 (2)

iterations count:57 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:52 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:777 (14), effective:137 (2)

iterations count:56 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:773 (14), effective:130 (2)

iterations count:60 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:467 (8), effective:70 (1)

iterations count:578 (11), effective:95 (1)

iterations count:65 (1), effective:2 (0)

iterations count:54 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:74 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:52 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:578 (11), effective:95 (1)

iterations count:52 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:578 (11), effective:95 (1)

iterations count:59 (1), effective:2 (0)

iterations count:54 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:55 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:52 (1), effective:0 (0)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-001B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="marciexred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool marciexred"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-001B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r426-tajo-167905978600186"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-001B.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-001B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;