fond
Model Checking Contest 2023
13th edition, Paris, France, April 26, 2023 (at TOOLympics II)
Execution of r330-tall-167889203600698
Last Updated
May 14, 2023

About the Execution of Marcie+red for ResAllocation-PT-R003C015

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
5714.804 12266.00 17300.00 350.70 FFFTFTTFFFTFFTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r330-tall-167889203600698.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool marciexred
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C015, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r330-tall-167889203600698
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 548K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K Feb 25 15:20 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K Feb 25 15:20 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Feb 25 15:19 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K Feb 25 15:19 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Jan 29 11:41 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Jan 29 11:41 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 16:44 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Feb 25 16:44 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Feb 25 16:44 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Feb 25 16:44 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K Feb 25 15:21 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K Feb 25 15:21 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 25 15:21 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K Feb 25 15:21 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Feb 25 16:44 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 16:44 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 Mar 5 18:23 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:23 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 107K Mar 5 18:23 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1679180862009

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=marciexred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R003C015
Applying reductions before tool marcie
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-18 23:07:43] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2023-03-18 23:07:43] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-18 23:07:43] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 48 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:43] [INFO ] Transformed 90 places.
[2023-03-18 23:07:43] [INFO ] Transformed 60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:43] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 90 places and 60 transitions and 264 arcs in 108 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Support contains 84 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 90 cols
[2023-03-18 23:07:43] [INFO ] Computed 45 place invariants in 12 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 401 ms returned []
[2023-03-18 23:07:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 23:07:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 506 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-18 23:07:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 23:07:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 61 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 580 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Support contains 84 out of 90 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 293 resets, run finished after 392 ms. (steps per millisecond=25 ) properties (out of 68) seen :62
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 34 ms. (steps per millisecond=294 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 86 ms. (steps per millisecond=116 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 11 resets, run finished after 49 ms. (steps per millisecond=204 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 26 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=454 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 24 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=454 ) properties (out of 6) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 26 resets, run finished after 39 ms. (steps per millisecond=256 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 5 properties.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] After 36ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :3 sat :1 real:1
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] After 48ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :3 sat :0 real:2
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] After 128ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :3 sat :0 real:2
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] After 27ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :2
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] After 43ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :2
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 13 ms.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] After 110ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :2
Fused 5 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 79 transition count 50
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 79 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 77 transition count 49
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 77 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 76 transition count 47
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 14 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 76 transition count 33
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Remove reverse transitions (loop back) rule discarded transition t5.t4 and 2 places that fell out of Prefix Of Interest.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 42 transition count 31
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 29 transition count 23
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 29 transition count 15
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 23 transition count 15
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 23 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 17 transition count 12
Applied a total of 87 rules in 28 ms. Remains 17 /90 variables (removed 73) and now considering 12/60 (removed 48) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 28 ms. Remains : 17/90 places, 12/60 transitions.
Finished random walk after 110 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=110 )
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 75 transition count 46
Applied a total of 29 rules in 7 ms. Remains 75 /90 variables (removed 15) and now considering 46/60 (removed 14) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 75/90 places, 46/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 84 transition count 54
Applied a total of 12 rules in 6 ms. Remains 84 /90 variables (removed 6) and now considering 54/60 (removed 6) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 84/90 places, 54/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 78 transition count 49
Applied a total of 23 rules in 6 ms. Remains 78 /90 variables (removed 12) and now considering 49/60 (removed 11) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 78/90 places, 49/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 49 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 76 transition count 47
Applied a total of 27 rules in 7 ms. Remains 76 /90 variables (removed 14) and now considering 47/60 (removed 13) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 76/90 places, 47/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 47 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 16 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 2 ms.
[2023-03-18 23:07:45] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 90 places, 60 transitions and 264 arcs took 1 ms.
Total runtime 2415 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
timeout --kill-after=10s --signal=SIGINT 1m for testing only

Marcie built on Linux at 2019-11-18.
A model checker for Generalized Stochastic Petri nets

authors: Alex Tovchigrechko (IDD package and CTL model checking)

Martin Schwarick (Symbolic numerical analysis and CSL model checking)

Christian Rohr (Simulative and approximative numerical model checking)

marcie@informatik.tu-cottbus.de

called as: /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../marcie/bin/marcie --net-file=model.pnml --mcc-file=CTLFireability.xml --memory=6 --mcc-mode

parse successfull
net created successfully

Net: Petri
(NrP: 90 NrTr: 60 NrArc: 264)

parse formulas
formulas created successfully
place and transition orderings generation:0m 0.000sec

net check time: 0m 0.000sec

init dd package: 0m 2.751sec


RS generation: 0m 0.006sec


-> reachability set: #nodes 586 (5.9e+02) #states 578,878,464 (8)



starting MCC model checker
--------------------------

checking: EF [AG [[p29<=0 | p35<=0]]]
normalized: E [true U ~ [E [true U ~ [[p29<=0 | p35<=0]]]]]

abstracting: (p35<=0)
states: 299,449,344 (8)
abstracting: (p29<=0)
states: 303,357,952 (8)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.025sec

checking: AF [EX [[1<=p47 & [1<=p50 & 1<=p53]]]]
normalized: ~ [EG [~ [EX [[[1<=p50 & 1<=p53] & 1<=p47]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p53)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p50)
states: 151,635,968 (8)
......................
EG iterations: 21
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.094sec

checking: E [[1<=p81 & [1<=p84 & 1<=p87]] U EX [~ [EF [1<=p4]]]]
normalized: E [[[1<=p84 & 1<=p87] & 1<=p81] U EX [~ [E [true U 1<=p4]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p81)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p87)
states: 350,884,864 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p84)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.034sec

checking: EG [AF [AG [EF [[[1<=p27 & [1<=p33 & 1<=p34]] | [1<=p47 & [1<=p50 & 1<=p53]]]]]]]
normalized: EG [~ [EG [E [true U ~ [E [true U [[[1<=p50 & 1<=p53] & 1<=p47] | [[1<=p33 & 1<=p34] & 1<=p27]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p27)
states: 278,065,664 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p34)
states: 221,420,544 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p53)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p50)
states: 151,635,968 (8)

EG iterations: 0
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.041sec

checking: EX [EG [[[AF [E [[1<=p67 & 1<=p73] U [1<=p81 & [1<=p84 & 1<=p87]]]] & 1<=p69] & [1<=p72 & 1<=p75]]]]
normalized: EX [EG [[[1<=p72 & 1<=p75] & [~ [EG [~ [E [[1<=p67 & 1<=p73] U [[1<=p84 & 1<=p87] & 1<=p81]]]]] & 1<=p69]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p81)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p87)
states: 350,884,864 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p84)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 293,114,880 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p67)
states: 272,586,752 (8)
.....................
EG iterations: 21
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p72)
states: 240,407,552 (8)
.......................
EG iterations: 23
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.090sec

checking: EX [A [AG [[~ [[1<=p49 & [1<=p55 & 1<=p56]]] | [[1<=p31 & 1<=p37] | [[1<=p71 & 1<=p74] & [1<=p77 & [1<=p2 & 1<=p5]]]]]] U EG [AG [[1<=p25 & [1<=p31 & 1<=p32]]]]]]
normalized: EX [[~ [EG [~ [EG [~ [E [true U ~ [[[1<=p31 & 1<=p32] & 1<=p25]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [EG [~ [E [true U ~ [[[1<=p31 & 1<=p32] & 1<=p25]]]]]] U [E [true U ~ [[[[[[1<=p2 & 1<=p5] & 1<=p77] & [1<=p71 & 1<=p74]] | [1<=p31 & 1<=p37]] | ~ [[[1<=p55 & 1<=p56] & 1<=p49]]]]] & ~ [EG [~ [E [true U ~ [[[1<=p31 & 1<=p32] & 1<=p25]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 276,522,496 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p32)
states: 144,236,544 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 279,715,840 (8)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p49)
states: 279,715,840 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p56)
states: 144,236,544 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p55)
states: 276,522,496 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 279,715,840 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p74)
states: 174,430,208 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p71)
states: 267,206,656 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p77)
states: 300,168,704 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 227,993,600 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 276,522,496 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p32)
states: 144,236,544 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 279,715,840 (8)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 276,522,496 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p32)
states: 144,236,544 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 279,715,840 (8)
.
EG iterations: 1

EG iterations: 0
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.026sec

checking: [EX [AX [E [1<=p30 U ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p5]]]]] & AX [E [[[1<=p9 & [1<=p12 & 1<=p15]] | AX [AX [[1<=p35 & [1<=p38 & 1<=p41]]]]] U [[1<=p43 & 1<=p49] | EG [[1<=p41 & 1<=p47]]]]]]
normalized: [~ [EX [~ [E [[~ [EX [EX [~ [[[1<=p38 & 1<=p41] & 1<=p35]]]]] | [[1<=p12 & 1<=p15] & 1<=p9]] U [EG [[1<=p41 & 1<=p47]] | [1<=p43 & 1<=p49]]]]]] & EX [~ [EX [~ [E [1<=p30 U ~ [[1<=p2 & 1<=p5]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 227,993,600 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p30)
states: 72,609,792 (7)
..abstracting: (1<=p49)
states: 279,715,840 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p43)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
...........................
EG iterations: 27
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 240,407,552 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p35)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p38)
states: 151,635,968 (8)
...-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.214sec

checking: AX [EX [E [[AG [1<=p78] | [E [[1<=p35 & [1<=p38 & 1<=p41]] U [1<=p75 & [1<=p81 & 1<=p82]]] & AF [[1<=p33 & [1<=p36 & 1<=p39]]]]] U ~ [[p47<=0 | [p50<=0 | p53<=0]]]]]]
normalized: ~ [EX [~ [EX [E [[[~ [EG [~ [[1<=p33 & [1<=p36 & 1<=p39]]]]] & E [[1<=p35 & [1<=p38 & 1<=p41]] U [1<=p75 & [1<=p81 & 1<=p82]]]] | ~ [E [true U ~ [1<=p78]]]] U ~ [[p47<=0 | [p50<=0 | p53<=0]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (p53<=0)
states: 299,449,344 (8)
abstracting: (p50<=0)
states: 427,242,496 (8)
abstracting: (p47<=0)
states: 300,959,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p78)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p82)
states: 180,807,168 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p81)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p38)
states: 151,635,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p35)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p39)
states: 280,910,336 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 226,552,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
.....................
EG iterations: 21
..-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.104sec

checking: [E [AF [EX [~ [[1<=p25 & [1<=p31 & 1<=p32]]]]] U AX [AG [A [[1<=p21 & [1<=p24 & 1<=p27]] U 1<=p16]]]] & EF [[EX [[AX [[p1<=0 | [p7<=0 | p8<=0]]] & [[p11<=0 | [p14<=0 | p17<=0]] & p4<=0]]] & AX [p40<=0]]]]
normalized: [E [true U [~ [EX [~ [p40<=0]]] & EX [[[p4<=0 & [p11<=0 | [p14<=0 | p17<=0]]] & ~ [EX [~ [[p1<=0 | [p7<=0 | p8<=0]]]]]]]]] & E [~ [EG [~ [EX [~ [[[1<=p31 & 1<=p32] & 1<=p25]]]]]] U ~ [EX [E [true U ~ [[~ [EG [~ [1<=p16]]] & ~ [E [~ [1<=p16] U [~ [[[1<=p24 & 1<=p27] & 1<=p21]] & ~ [1<=p16]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 97,902,592 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p27)
states: 278,065,664 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 229,746,176 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 97,902,592 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p16)
states: 97,902,592 (7)
.
EG iterations: 1
.abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 276,522,496 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p32)
states: 144,236,544 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 279,715,840 (8)
...
EG iterations: 2
abstracting: (p8<=0)
states: 478,665,216 (8)
abstracting: (p7<=0)
states: 285,763,584 (8)
abstracting: (p1<=0)
states: 312,117,248 (8)
.abstracting: (p17<=0)
states: 311,671,808 (8)
abstracting: (p14<=0)
states: 404,448,256 (8)
abstracting: (p11<=0)
states: 278,709,760 (8)
abstracting: (p4<=0)
states: 410,565,632 (8)
.abstracting: (p40<=0)
states: 500,849,664 (8)
.-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.093sec

checking: A [[EF [EX [[[EX [1<=p88] & [1<=p57 & 1<=p60]] & [1<=p63 & [1<=p49 & 1<=p43]]]]] | [1<=p43 & 1<=p49]] U AG [A [~ [AX [[1<=p75 & [1<=p81 & 1<=p82]]]] U EF [[1<=p88 | [1<=p73 & [1<=p79 & 1<=p80]]]]]]]
normalized: [~ [EG [E [true U ~ [[~ [EG [~ [E [true U [1<=p88 | [1<=p73 & [1<=p79 & 1<=p80]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [E [true U [1<=p88 | [1<=p73 & [1<=p79 & 1<=p80]]]]] U [~ [EX [~ [[1<=p75 & [1<=p81 & 1<=p82]]]]] & ~ [E [true U [1<=p88 | [1<=p73 & [1<=p79 & 1<=p80]]]]]]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [E [true U ~ [[~ [EG [~ [E [true U [1<=p88 | [1<=p73 & [1<=p79 & 1<=p80]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [E [true U [1<=p88 | [1<=p73 & [1<=p79 & 1<=p80]]]]] U [~ [EX [~ [[1<=p75 & [1<=p81 & 1<=p82]]]]] & ~ [E [true U [1<=p88 | [1<=p73 & [1<=p79 & 1<=p80]]]]]]]]]]] U [~ [[[1<=p43 & 1<=p49] | E [true U EX [[[1<=p63 & [1<=p49 & 1<=p43]] & [[1<=p57 & 1<=p60] & EX [1<=p88]]]]]]] & E [true U ~ [[~ [EG [~ [E [true U [1<=p88 | [1<=p73 & [1<=p79 & 1<=p80]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [E [true U [1<=p88 | [1<=p73 & [1<=p79 & 1<=p80]]]]] U [~ [EX [~ [[1<=p75 & [1<=p81 & 1<=p82]]]]] & ~ [E [true U [1<=p88 | [1<=p73 & [1<=p79 & 1<=p80]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p80)
states: 100,213,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 293,114,880 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p82)
states: 180,807,168 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p81)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p80)
states: 100,213,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 293,114,880 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p80)
states: 100,213,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 293,114,880 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p60)
states: 229,746,176 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p57)
states: 278,065,664 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p43)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p49)
states: 279,715,840 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p63)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p49)
states: 279,715,840 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p43)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p80)
states: 100,213,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 293,114,880 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p82)
states: 180,807,168 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p81)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p80)
states: 100,213,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 293,114,880 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p80)
states: 100,213,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 293,114,880 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p80)
states: 100,213,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 293,114,880 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p82)
states: 180,807,168 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p81)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p80)
states: 100,213,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 293,114,880 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p80)
states: 100,213,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 293,114,880 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
.
EG iterations: 1

EG iterations: 0
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.040sec

checking: EF [EG [E [[[1<=p35 & [1<=p38 & 1<=p41]] | [EG [[1<=p57 & [1<=p60 & 1<=p63]]] & [[1<=p81 & [1<=p84 & 1<=p87]] | [1<=p47 & [1<=p50 & 1<=p53]]]]] U [AG [1<=p54] & [EF [1<=p76] | [[1<=p33 & 1<=p36] & [1<=p39 & 1<=p76]]]]]]]
normalized: E [true U EG [E [[[[[1<=p47 & [1<=p50 & 1<=p53]] | [1<=p81 & [1<=p84 & 1<=p87]]] & EG [[1<=p57 & [1<=p60 & 1<=p63]]]] | [1<=p35 & [1<=p38 & 1<=p41]]] U [[[[1<=p39 & 1<=p76] & [1<=p33 & 1<=p36]] | E [true U 1<=p76]] & ~ [E [true U ~ [1<=p54]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p54)
states: 72,609,792 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p76)
states: 97,902,592 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 226,552,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p76)
states: 97,902,592 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p39)
states: 280,910,336 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p38)
states: 151,635,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p35)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p63)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p60)
states: 229,746,176 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p57)
states: 278,065,664 (8)
........................
EG iterations: 24
abstracting: (1<=p87)
states: 350,884,864 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p84)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p81)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p53)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p50)
states: 151,635,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.051sec

checking: [AX [[EG [[EX [[1<=p49 & [1<=p55 & 1<=p56]]] | [AF [1<=p52] | [1<=p77 & 1<=p83]]]] & [AF [[[p9<=0 | [p12<=0 | p15<=0]] & [p37<=0 | [p43<=0 | p44<=0]]]] | [AG [[p39<=0 | [p45<=0 | p46<=0]]] & 1<=p6]]]] | EF [AG [[p79<=0 | p85<=0]]]]
normalized: [E [true U ~ [E [true U ~ [[p79<=0 | p85<=0]]]]] | ~ [EX [~ [[[[1<=p6 & ~ [E [true U ~ [[p39<=0 | [p45<=0 | p46<=0]]]]]] | ~ [EG [~ [[[p37<=0 | [p43<=0 | p44<=0]] & [p9<=0 | [p12<=0 | p15<=0]]]]]]] & EG [[[[1<=p77 & 1<=p83] | ~ [EG [~ [1<=p52]]]] | EX [[1<=p49 & [1<=p55 & 1<=p56]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p56)
states: 144,236,544 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p55)
states: 276,522,496 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p49)
states: 279,715,840 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p52)
states: 78,028,800 (7)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p83)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p77)
states: 300,168,704 (8)
.............................
EG iterations: 29
abstracting: (p15<=0)
states: 308,766,720 (8)
abstracting: (p12<=0)
states: 338,470,912 (8)
abstracting: (p9<=0)
states: 274,643,456 (8)
abstracting: (p44<=0)
states: 432,546,304 (8)
abstracting: (p43<=0)
states: 300,650,496 (8)
abstracting: (p37<=0)
states: 300,650,496 (8)
.......................
EG iterations: 23
abstracting: (p46<=0)
states: 355,948,032 (8)
abstracting: (p45<=0)
states: 297,968,128 (8)
abstracting: (p39<=0)
states: 297,968,128 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
.abstracting: (p85<=0)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (p79<=0)
states: 312,117,248 (8)
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.347sec

checking: E [EG [~ [[1<=p76 & [1<=p54 & p18<=0]]]] U AF [[[~ [E [[1<=p69 & [1<=p72 & 1<=p75]] U [1<=p33 & [1<=p36 & 1<=p39]]]] & AG [AX [[1<=p53 & 1<=p59]]]] & [1<=p31 & [1<=p37 & [~ [[1<=p83 & [1<=p86 & 1<=p89]]] | [[AG [[1<=p5 & 1<=p11]] & [1<=p40 & 1<=p78]] | [1<=p53 & 1<=p59]]]]]]]]
normalized: E [EG [~ [[1<=p76 & [1<=p54 & p18<=0]]]] U ~ [EG [~ [[[1<=p31 & [1<=p37 & [[[1<=p53 & 1<=p59] | [[1<=p40 & 1<=p78] & ~ [E [true U ~ [[1<=p5 & 1<=p11]]]]]] | ~ [[1<=p83 & [1<=p86 & 1<=p89]]]]]] & [~ [E [true U EX [~ [[1<=p53 & 1<=p59]]]]] & ~ [E [[1<=p69 & [1<=p72 & 1<=p75]] U [1<=p33 & [1<=p36 & 1<=p39]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p39)
states: 280,910,336 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 226,552,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p72)
states: 240,407,552 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p59)
states: 275,520,512 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p53)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p89)
states: 410,565,632 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p86)
states: 227,993,600 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p83)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 300,168,704 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p78)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p40)
states: 78,028,800 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p59)
states: 275,520,512 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p53)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 279,715,840 (8)

EG iterations: 0
abstracting: (p18<=0)
states: 512,994,304 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p54)
states: 72,609,792 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p76)
states: 97,902,592 (7)
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.025sec

checking: [E [~ [[[[1<=p4 & [1<=p41 & 1<=p47]] | [[1<=p37 & [1<=p43 & 1<=p44]] | ~ [[1<=p17 & [1<=p23 & 1<=p6]]]]] & [[[1<=p27 & 1<=p33] & [1<=p34 & [[1<=p27 & [1<=p33 & 1<=p34]] | [1<=p3 & [1<=p9 & 1<=p10]]]]] | [1<=p15 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]]]]] U EG [[[1<=p3 & 1<=p9] & [1<=p10 & 1<=p1]]]] & EG [[[[[[1<=p0 & 1<=p3] | [1<=p71 & [1<=p74 & 1<=p77]]] & 1<=p15] & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]] | AF [~ [A [1<=p88 U 1<=p42]]]]]]
normalized: [EG [[~ [EG [[~ [EG [~ [1<=p42]]] & ~ [E [~ [1<=p42] U [~ [1<=p88] & ~ [1<=p42]]]]]]] | [[1<=p21 & 1<=p22] & [1<=p15 & [[1<=p71 & [1<=p74 & 1<=p77]] | [1<=p0 & 1<=p3]]]]]] & E [~ [[[[1<=p15 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]] | [[1<=p34 & [[1<=p3 & [1<=p9 & 1<=p10]] | [1<=p27 & [1<=p33 & 1<=p34]]]] & [1<=p27 & 1<=p33]]] & [[~ [[1<=p17 & [1<=p23 & 1<=p6]]] | [1<=p37 & [1<=p43 & 1<=p44]]] | [1<=p4 & [1<=p41 & 1<=p47]]]]] U EG [[[1<=p10 & 1<=p1] & [1<=p3 & 1<=p9]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p1)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 180,807,168 (8)
.....................
EG iterations: 21
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p4)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p44)
states: 146,332,160 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p43)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 283,171,840 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 267,206,656 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p27)
states: 278,065,664 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p34)
states: 221,420,544 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p27)
states: 278,065,664 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p10)
states: 180,807,168 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p34)
states: 221,420,544 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 213,769,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p77)
states: 300,168,704 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p74)
states: 174,430,208 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p71)
states: 267,206,656 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 213,769,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p42)
states: 74,097,664 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p42)
states: 74,097,664 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p42)
states: 74,097,664 (7)
.
EG iterations: 1
.....................
EG iterations: 21
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.264sec

checking: [AG [E [A [[[[[1<=p9 & [1<=p12 & 1<=p15]] | [1<=p37 & [1<=p43 & 1<=p44]]] & [1<=p83 & 1<=p86]] & [[1<=p89 & 1<=p35] & [1<=p38 & 1<=p41]]] U [AX [~ [[p39<=0 | [p45<=0 | p46<=0]]]] | [[1<=p2 & 1<=p5] | [1<=p53 & 1<=p59]]]] U ~ [E [1<=p66 U 1<=p88]]]] | [[EX [[~ [A [p42<=0 U p4<=0]] & ~ [E [[[1<=p61 & [1<=p67 & 1<=p68]] | [1<=p5 & 1<=p11]] U E [[1<=p0 & 1<=p3] U [1<=p31 & 1<=p37]]]]]] & AF [[p47<=0 | [p50<=0 | p53<=0]]]] & [~ [A [[1<=p67 & 1<=p73] U [1<=p15 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]]]] & AX [[EX [p6<=0] & AF [[1<=p47 & [1<=p50 & 1<=p53]]]]]]]]
normalized: [[[~ [EX [~ [[~ [EG [~ [[1<=p47 & [1<=p50 & 1<=p53]]]]] & EX [p6<=0]]]]] & ~ [[~ [EG [~ [[1<=p15 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[1<=p15 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]]] U [~ [[1<=p67 & 1<=p73]] & ~ [[1<=p15 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]]]]]]]]] & [~ [EG [~ [[p47<=0 | [p50<=0 | p53<=0]]]]] & EX [[~ [E [[[1<=p5 & 1<=p11] | [1<=p61 & [1<=p67 & 1<=p68]]] U E [[1<=p0 & 1<=p3] U [1<=p31 & 1<=p37]]]] & ~ [[~ [EG [~ [p4<=0]]] & ~ [E [~ [p4<=0] U [~ [p42<=0] & ~ [p4<=0]]]]]]]]]] | ~ [E [true U ~ [E [[~ [EG [~ [[[[1<=p53 & 1<=p59] | [1<=p2 & 1<=p5]] | ~ [EX [[p39<=0 | [p45<=0 | p46<=0]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[[[1<=p53 & 1<=p59] | [1<=p2 & 1<=p5]] | ~ [EX [[p39<=0 | [p45<=0 | p46<=0]]]]]] U [~ [[[[1<=p38 & 1<=p41] & [1<=p89 & 1<=p35]] & [[1<=p83 & 1<=p86] & [[1<=p37 & [1<=p43 & 1<=p44]] | [1<=p9 & [1<=p12 & 1<=p15]]]]]] & ~ [[[[1<=p53 & 1<=p59] | [1<=p2 & 1<=p5]] | ~ [EX [[p39<=0 | [p45<=0 | p46<=0]]]]]]]]]] U ~ [E [1<=p66 U 1<=p88]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p88)
states: 168,312,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p66)
states: 65,884,160 (7)
abstracting: (p46<=0)
states: 355,948,032 (8)
abstracting: (p45<=0)
states: 297,968,128 (8)
abstracting: (p39<=0)
states: 297,968,128 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 227,993,600 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p59)
states: 275,520,512 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p53)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p12)
states: 240,407,552 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p9)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p44)
states: 146,332,160 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p43)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p86)
states: 227,993,600 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p83)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p35)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p89)
states: 410,565,632 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p38)
states: 151,635,968 (8)
abstracting: (p46<=0)
states: 355,948,032 (8)
abstracting: (p45<=0)
states: 297,968,128 (8)
abstracting: (p39<=0)
states: 297,968,128 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 227,993,600 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p59)
states: 275,520,512 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p53)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
abstracting: (p46<=0)
states: 355,948,032 (8)
abstracting: (p45<=0)
states: 297,968,128 (8)
abstracting: (p39<=0)
states: 297,968,128 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 227,993,600 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p59)
states: 275,520,512 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p53)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
.............................
EG iterations: 29
abstracting: (p4<=0)
states: 410,565,632 (8)
abstracting: (p42<=0)
states: 504,780,800 (8)
abstracting: (p4<=0)
states: 410,565,632 (8)
abstracting: (p4<=0)
states: 410,565,632 (8)
.........................
EG iterations: 25
abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p31)
states: 279,715,840 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p68)
states: 134,336,512 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p67)
states: 272,586,752 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p61)
states: 283,248,128 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 300,168,704 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
.abstracting: (p53<=0)
states: 299,449,344 (8)
abstracting: (p50<=0)
states: 427,242,496 (8)
abstracting: (p47<=0)
states: 300,959,232 (8)
......................
EG iterations: 22
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 213,769,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p73)
states: 293,114,880 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p67)
states: 272,586,752 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 213,769,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 213,769,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
...................
EG iterations: 19
abstracting: (p6<=0)
states: 533,522,432 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p53)
states: 279,429,120 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p50)
states: 151,635,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
......................
EG iterations: 22
.-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.755sec

checking: A [[AX [AF [[[1<=p43 & 1<=p44] & 1<=p37]]] & EG [E [~ [E [1<=p76 U [1<=p21 & [1<=p24 & 1<=p27]]]] U [E [[1<=p65 & 1<=p71] U [1<=p2 & 1<=p5]] | ~ [[1<=p83 & [1<=p86 & 1<=p89]]]]]]] U [EG [[AF [[1<=p0 & 1<=p3]] & [A [[1<=p45 & [1<=p48 & 1<=p51]] U 1<=p6] | [[1<=p15 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]] | [1<=p41 & 1<=p47]]]]] | [[AG [~ [AX [[1<=p69 & [1<=p72 & 1<=p75]]]]] & [EX [~ [[1<=p63 & [1<=p69 & 1<=p70]]]] | [EX [[1<=p5 & 1<=p11]] & AF [[1<=p33 & [1<=p36 & 1<=p39]]]]]] | [EF [AG [[[1<=p69 & 1<=p72] & [1<=p75 & 1<=p76]]]] & ~ [[[1<=p79 & 1<=p85] & [[~ [[1<=p17 & 1<=p23]] | [[1<=p57 & 1<=p60] & [1<=p63 & 1<=p42]]] & [1<=p19 & 1<=p25]]]]]]]]
normalized: [~ [EG [~ [[[[~ [[[[1<=p19 & 1<=p25] & [[[1<=p63 & 1<=p42] & [1<=p57 & 1<=p60]] | ~ [[1<=p17 & 1<=p23]]]] & [1<=p79 & 1<=p85]]] & E [true U ~ [E [true U ~ [[[1<=p75 & 1<=p76] & [1<=p69 & 1<=p72]]]]]]] | [[[~ [EG [~ [[1<=p33 & [1<=p36 & 1<=p39]]]]] & EX [[1<=p5 & 1<=p11]]] | EX [~ [[1<=p63 & [1<=p69 & 1<=p70]]]]] & ~ [E [true U ~ [EX [~ [[1<=p69 & [1<=p72 & 1<=p75]]]]]]]]] | EG [[[[[1<=p41 & 1<=p47] | [1<=p15 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]]] | [~ [EG [~ [1<=p6]]] & ~ [E [~ [1<=p6] U [~ [[1<=p45 & [1<=p48 & 1<=p51]]] & ~ [1<=p6]]]]]] & ~ [EG [~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p3]]]]]]]]]] & ~ [E [~ [[[[~ [[[[1<=p19 & 1<=p25] & [[[1<=p63 & 1<=p42] & [1<=p57 & 1<=p60]] | ~ [[1<=p17 & 1<=p23]]]] & [1<=p79 & 1<=p85]]] & E [true U ~ [E [true U ~ [[[1<=p75 & 1<=p76] & [1<=p69 & 1<=p72]]]]]]] | [[[~ [EG [~ [[1<=p33 & [1<=p36 & 1<=p39]]]]] & EX [[1<=p5 & 1<=p11]]] | EX [~ [[1<=p63 & [1<=p69 & 1<=p70]]]]] & ~ [E [true U ~ [EX [~ [[1<=p69 & [1<=p72 & 1<=p75]]]]]]]]] | EG [[[[[1<=p41 & 1<=p47] | [1<=p15 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]]] | [~ [EG [~ [1<=p6]]] & ~ [E [~ [1<=p6] U [~ [[1<=p45 & [1<=p48 & 1<=p51]]] & ~ [1<=p6]]]]]] & ~ [EG [~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p3]]]]]]]] U [~ [[EG [E [~ [E [1<=p76 U [1<=p21 & [1<=p24 & 1<=p27]]]] U [~ [[1<=p83 & [1<=p86 & 1<=p89]]] | E [[1<=p65 & 1<=p71] U [1<=p2 & 1<=p5]]]]] & ~ [EX [EG [~ [[1<=p37 & [1<=p43 & 1<=p44]]]]]]]] & ~ [[[[~ [[[[1<=p19 & 1<=p25] & [[[1<=p63 & 1<=p42] & [1<=p57 & 1<=p60]] | ~ [[1<=p17 & 1<=p23]]]] & [1<=p79 & 1<=p85]]] & E [true U ~ [E [true U ~ [[[1<=p75 & 1<=p76] & [1<=p69 & 1<=p72]]]]]]] | [[[~ [EG [~ [[1<=p33 & [1<=p36 & 1<=p39]]]]] & EX [[1<=p5 & 1<=p11]]] | EX [~ [[1<=p63 & [1<=p69 & 1<=p70]]]]] & ~ [E [true U ~ [EX [~ [[1<=p69 & [1<=p72 & 1<=p75]]]]]]]]] | EG [[[[[1<=p41 & 1<=p47] | [1<=p15 & [1<=p21 & 1<=p22]]] | [~ [EG [~ [1<=p6]]] & ~ [E [~ [1<=p6] U [~ [[1<=p45 & [1<=p48 & 1<=p51]]] & ~ [1<=p6]]]]]] & ~ [EG [~ [[1<=p0 & 1<=p3]]]]]]]]]]]]

abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
......................
EG iterations: 22
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p51)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p48)
states: 226,552,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p45)
states: 280,910,336 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 213,769,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
..........................
EG iterations: 26
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p72)
states: 240,407,552 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p70)
states: 213,769,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p63)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 300,168,704 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p39)
states: 280,910,336 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 226,552,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
.....................
EG iterations: 21
abstracting: (1<=p72)
states: 240,407,552 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p76)
states: 97,902,592 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p85)
states: 312,117,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 283,171,840 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 267,206,656 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p60)
states: 229,746,176 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p57)
states: 278,065,664 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p42)
states: 74,097,664 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p63)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 276,522,496 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 283,248,128 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p44)
states: 146,332,160 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p43)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p37)
states: 278,227,968 (8)
...................
EG iterations: 19
.abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p2)
states: 227,993,600 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p71)
states: 267,206,656 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p65)
states: 283,171,840 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p89)
states: 410,565,632 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p86)
states: 227,993,600 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p83)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p27)
states: 278,065,664 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p24)
states: 229,746,176 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p76)
states: 97,902,592 (7)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
......................
EG iterations: 22
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p51)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p48)
states: 226,552,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p45)
states: 280,910,336 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 213,769,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
..........................
EG iterations: 26
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p72)
states: 240,407,552 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p70)
states: 213,769,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p63)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 300,168,704 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p39)
states: 280,910,336 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 226,552,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
.....................
EG iterations: 21
abstracting: (1<=p72)
states: 240,407,552 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p76)
states: 97,902,592 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p85)
states: 312,117,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 283,171,840 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 267,206,656 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p60)
states: 229,746,176 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p57)
states: 278,065,664 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p42)
states: 74,097,664 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p63)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 276,522,496 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 283,248,128 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p3)
states: 250,671,616 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p0)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
......................
EG iterations: 22
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p51)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p48)
states: 226,552,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p45)
states: 280,910,336 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p6)
states: 45,356,032 (7)
.
EG iterations: 1
abstracting: (1<=p22)
states: 213,769,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p21)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p15)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p47)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p41)
states: 277,919,232 (8)
..........................
EG iterations: 26
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p72)
states: 240,407,552 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p70)
states: 213,769,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p63)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p11)
states: 300,168,704 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p5)
states: 229,758,464 (8)
.abstracting: (1<=p39)
states: 280,910,336 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p36)
states: 226,552,832 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p33)
states: 283,005,952 (8)
.....................
EG iterations: 21
abstracting: (1<=p72)
states: 240,407,552 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p69)
states: 270,111,744 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p76)
states: 97,902,592 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p75)
states: 304,235,008 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p85)
states: 312,117,248 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p79)
states: 266,761,216 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p23)
states: 283,171,840 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p17)
states: 267,206,656 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p60)
states: 229,746,176 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p57)
states: 278,065,664 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p42)
states: 74,097,664 (7)
abstracting: (1<=p63)
states: 287,965,696 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p25)
states: 276,522,496 (8)
abstracting: (1<=p19)
states: 283,248,128 (8)
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C015-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT

MC time: 0m 0.503sec

totally nodes used: 4103222 (4.1e+06)
number of garbage collections: 0
fire ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 1355036 5674843 7029879
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 8794215 58314649 16 1024MB
basic ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 323348 1208534 1531882
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 2199529 14577687 12 192MB
unary ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 8 128MB
abstract ops cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 16777216 12 192MB
state nr cache: hits/miss/sum: 5415 28224 33639
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 28166 8360442 32 256MB
max state cache: hits/miss/sum: 0 0 0
used/not used/entry size/cache size: 0 8388608 32 256MB
uniqueHash elements/entry size/size: 67108864 4 256MB
0 63464336
1 3248024
2 341152
3 49125
4 5653
5 539
6 33
7 2
8 0
9 0
>= 10 0

Total processing time: 0m 7.399sec


BK_STOP 1679180874275

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
check for maximal unmarked siphon
ok
check for constant places
ok
check if there are places and transitions
ok
check if there are transitions without pre-places
ok
check if at least one transition is enabled in m0
ok
check if there are transitions that can never fire
ok


initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:459 (7), effective:90 (1)

initing FirstDep: 0m 0.000sec


iterations count:96 (1), effective:5 (0)

iterations count:134 (2), effective:13 (0)

iterations count:96 (1), effective:9 (0)

iterations count:79 (1), effective:5 (0)

iterations count:224 (3), effective:24 (0)

iterations count:183 (3), effective:21 (0)

iterations count:77 (1), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:70 (1), effective:2 (0)

iterations count:225 (3), effective:26 (0)

iterations count:70 (1), effective:2 (0)

iterations count:60 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:70 (1), effective:2 (0)

iterations count:62 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:157 (2), effective:14 (0)

iterations count:67 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:117 (1), effective:9 (0)

iterations count:118 (1), effective:9 (0)

iterations count:73 (1), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:70 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:582 (9), effective:96 (1)

iterations count:213 (3), effective:35 (0)

iterations count:136 (2), effective:12 (0)

iterations count:136 (2), effective:12 (0)

iterations count:536 (8), effective:89 (1)

iterations count:136 (2), effective:12 (0)

iterations count:93 (1), effective:6 (0)

iterations count:219 (3), effective:23 (0)

iterations count:136 (2), effective:12 (0)

iterations count:136 (2), effective:12 (0)

iterations count:536 (8), effective:89 (1)

iterations count:136 (2), effective:12 (0)

iterations count:93 (1), effective:6 (0)

iterations count:194 (3), effective:22 (0)

iterations count:136 (2), effective:12 (0)

iterations count:136 (2), effective:12 (0)

iterations count:536 (8), effective:89 (1)

iterations count:136 (2), effective:12 (0)

iterations count:93 (1), effective:6 (0)

iterations count:67 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:159 (2), effective:15 (0)

iterations count:124 (2), effective:9 (0)

iterations count:84 (1), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:132 (2), effective:12 (0)

iterations count:122 (2), effective:9 (0)

iterations count:81 (1), effective:3 (0)

iterations count:65 (1), effective:2 (0)

iterations count:181 (3), effective:23 (0)

iterations count:65 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:120 (2), effective:9 (0)

iterations count:75 (1), effective:4 (0)

iterations count:72 (1), effective:2 (0)

iterations count:284 (4), effective:35 (0)

iterations count:162 (2), effective:15 (0)

iterations count:94 (1), effective:5 (0)

iterations count:113 (1), effective:11 (0)

iterations count:122 (2), effective:10 (0)

iterations count:96 (1), effective:6 (0)

iterations count:601 (10), effective:98 (1)

iterations count:65 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:95 (1), effective:9 (0)

iterations count:122 (2), effective:9 (0)

iterations count:106 (1), effective:11 (0)

iterations count:96 (1), effective:6 (0)

iterations count:601 (10), effective:98 (1)

iterations count:65 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:67 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:96 (1), effective:6 (0)

iterations count:601 (10), effective:98 (1)

iterations count:65 (1), effective:1 (0)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R003C015"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="marciexred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool marciexred"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C015, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r330-tall-167889203600698"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R003C015.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R003C015 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;