Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r229-tall-167856413300482.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r229-tall-167856413300482
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.5M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 25 16:56 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K Feb 25 16:56 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Feb 25 16:56 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K Feb 25 16:56 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Feb 25 16:21 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K Feb 25 16:21 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 16:21 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Feb 25 16:21 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Feb 25 16:57 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 144K Feb 25 16:57 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Feb 25 16:57 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K Feb 25 16:57 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Feb 25 16:21 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K Feb 25 16:21 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 905K Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1679492025811

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-22 13:33:47] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-22 13:33:47] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-22 13:33:47] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 92 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:47] [INFO ] Transformed 1542 places.
[2023-03-22 13:33:47] [INFO ] Transformed 1449 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:33:47] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1542 places and 1449 transitions and 4668 arcs in 168 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 196 out of 1542 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1542/1542 places, 1449/1449 transitions.
Reduce places removed 293 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 293 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 1249 transition count 1449
Discarding 240 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 240 rule applications. Total rules 533 place count 1009 transition count 1209
Iterating global reduction 1 with 240 rules applied. Total rules applied 773 place count 1009 transition count 1209
Discarding 185 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 185 rule applications. Total rules 958 place count 824 transition count 1024
Iterating global reduction 1 with 185 rules applied. Total rules applied 1143 place count 824 transition count 1024
Discarding 158 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 158 rule applications. Total rules 1301 place count 666 transition count 866
Iterating global reduction 1 with 158 rules applied. Total rules applied 1459 place count 666 transition count 866
Applied a total of 1459 rules in 247 ms. Remains 666 /1542 variables (removed 876) and now considering 866/1449 (removed 583) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 866 rows 666 cols
[2023-03-22 13:33:47] [INFO ] Computed 54 place invariants in 41 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 602 ms returned [72, 116, 206, 281, 321, 390, 394]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 627 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 659/1542 places, 866/1449 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 650 transition count 857
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 650 transition count 857
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 649 transition count 856
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 649 transition count 856
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 648 transition count 855
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 648 transition count 855
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 647 transition count 854
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 647 transition count 854
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 646 transition count 853
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 646 transition count 853
Applied a total of 26 rules in 63 ms. Remains 646 /659 variables (removed 13) and now considering 853/866 (removed 13) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:33:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 852 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 852 rows 646 cols
[2023-03-22 13:33:48] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 20 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 208 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:33:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 852 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:33:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:33:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 508 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 718 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 646/1542 places, 853/1449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1656 ms. Remains : 646/1542 places, 853/1449 transitions.
Support contains 196 out of 646 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-22 13:33:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 81 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 853 transitions.
Support contains 195 out of 646 places (down from 196) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 377 resets, run finished after 405 ms. (steps per millisecond=24 ) properties (out of 109) seen :96
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 42 ms. (steps per millisecond=238 ) properties (out of 13) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 24 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=357 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=270 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 32 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=434 ) properties (out of 12) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 29 ms. (steps per millisecond=344 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 32 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=500 ) properties (out of 11) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 24 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=434 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 24 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=526 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 24 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=526 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=357 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 30 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 10) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=357 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 9 properties.
[2023-03-22 13:33:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 852 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:33:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:33:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 47 generalized place invariants in 20 ms returned sat
[2023-03-22 13:33:50] [INFO ] After 559ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:9
[2023-03-22 13:33:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 47 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2023-03-22 13:33:51] [INFO ] After 454ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :6
[2023-03-22 13:33:52] [INFO ] After 816ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :6
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 248 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:33:52] [INFO ] After 1343ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :6
Fused 9 Parikh solutions to 6 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 9 ms.
Support contains 42 out of 646 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1594 edges and 646 vertex of which 418 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 228 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 228 places :
Also discarding 124 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 124 transitions
Drop transitions removed 92 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 92 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 418 transition count 603
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 383 transition count 602
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 382 transition count 586
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 366 transition count 586
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 366 transition count 568
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 348 transition count 568
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 322 transition count 542
Iterating global reduction 4 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 322 transition count 542
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 287 place count 319 transition count 539
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 319 transition count 539
Performed 38 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 281 transition count 501
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 375 place count 272 transition count 492
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 272 transition count 492
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 385 place count 271 transition count 491
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 386 place count 271 transition count 491
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 270 transition count 491
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 269 transition count 490
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 4 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 269 transition count 486
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 265 transition count 486
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 26 times.
Drop transitions removed 26 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 265 transition count 486
Applied a total of 423 rules in 110 ms. Remains 265 /646 variables (removed 381) and now considering 486/853 (removed 367) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 110 ms. Remains : 265/646 places, 486/853 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 898 resets, run finished after 262 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 6) seen :3
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 64 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=454 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 61 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=416 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=625 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 3 properties.
[2023-03-22 13:33:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 387 transitions (discarded 99 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 387 rows 265 cols
[2023-03-22 13:33:52] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 14 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 26 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2023-03-22 13:33:52] [INFO ] After 129ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2 real:1
[2023-03-22 13:33:52] [INFO ] After 182ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2 real:1
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 58 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:33:53] [INFO ] After 310ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2 real:1
[2023-03-22 13:33:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 26 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2023-03-22 13:33:53] [INFO ] After 121ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
[2023-03-22 13:33:53] [INFO ] After 208ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 49 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:33:53] [INFO ] After 317ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2 ms.
Support contains 29 out of 265 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 486/486 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1017 edges and 265 vertex of which 164 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 101 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 101 places :
Also discarding 9 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Drop transitions removed 77 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 77 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 164 transition count 399
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 162 transition count 395
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 162 transition count 390
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 157 transition count 390
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 131 transition count 364
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 131 transition count 364
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 131 transition count 363
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 130 transition count 363
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 10 times.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 130 transition count 363
Applied a total of 159 rules in 34 ms. Remains 130 /265 variables (removed 135) and now considering 363/486 (removed 123) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 34 ms. Remains : 130/265 places, 363/486 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1057 resets, run finished after 127 ms. (steps per millisecond=78 ) properties (out of 3) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=666 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 83 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=1000 ) properties (out of 2) seen :1
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
[2023-03-22 13:33:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 171 transitions (discarded 192 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 171 rows 130 cols
[2023-03-22 13:33:53] [INFO ] Computed 7 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-22 13:33:53] [INFO ] After 40ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2023-03-22 13:33:53] [INFO ] After 55ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 14 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:33:53] [INFO ] After 102ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 15 out of 130 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 363/363 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 383 edges and 130 vertex of which 86 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 44 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 44 places :
Also discarding 13 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 13 transitions
Drop transitions removed 27 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 27 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 85 transition count 323
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 82 transition count 320
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 82 transition count 320
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 81 transition count 319
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 81 transition count 319
Applied a total of 41 rules in 23 ms. Remains 81 /130 variables (removed 49) and now considering 319/363 (removed 44) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 23 ms. Remains : 81/130 places, 319/363 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1425 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=454 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 126 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=909 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 170182 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 613 ms. (steps per millisecond=277 )
Probabilistic random walk after 170182 steps, saw 44983 distinct states, run finished after 613 ms. (steps per millisecond=277 ) properties seen :1
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 853 transitions.
Computed a total of 646 stabilizing places and 853 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 646 transition count 853
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 1 formulas.
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 79 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 79 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 567 transition count 774
Iterating global reduction 0 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 567 transition count 774
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 511 transition count 718
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 511 transition count 718
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 505 transition count 718
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 310 place count 471 transition count 684
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 471 transition count 684
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 22 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 449 transition count 684
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 398 place count 417 transition count 652
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 417 transition count 652
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 458 place count 389 transition count 624
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 389 transition count 624
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 514 place count 361 transition count 596
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 542 place count 361 transition count 596
Discarding 64 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 64 rule applications. Total rules 606 place count 297 transition count 532
Iterating global reduction 2 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 670 place count 297 transition count 532
Discarding 163 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 163 rule applications. Total rules 833 place count 134 transition count 369
Iterating global reduction 2 with 163 rules applied. Total rules applied 996 place count 134 transition count 369
Applied a total of 996 rules in 104 ms. Remains 134 /646 variables (removed 512) and now considering 369/853 (removed 484) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 153 transitions (discarded 216 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 153 rows 134 cols
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [26, 30, 46, 50, 54, 60, 64, 70, 77, 88, 92, 96, 119, 123]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/646 places, 369/853 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 82 transition count 331
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 82 transition count 331
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 80 transition count 329
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 80 transition count 329
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 78 transition count 327
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 78 transition count 327
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 76 transition count 325
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 76 transition count 325
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 74 transition count 323
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 74 transition count 323
Applied a total of 92 rules in 9 ms. Remains 74 /120 variables (removed 46) and now considering 323/369 (removed 46) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 239 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 74 cols
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 239 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 74/646 places, 323/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 350 ms. Remains : 74/646 places, 323/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 323 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5533655286229130111.gal : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:33:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4806758512451301183.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5533655286229130111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4806758512451301183.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,987785,3.72984,113732,2,22136,5,483606,6,0,601,395639,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(AX(AG(((Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7>=1)||(Node15HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode5>=1)))) U !(A(EX(((Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownO...340
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7>=1)||(Node15HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode5>...688
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t19, t20, t21, t22, t24, t25, t26, t28, t29...1586
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 13:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 13:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14596861067713944748.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14596861067713944748.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14596861067713944748.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14596861067713944748.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14596861067713944748.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 13:34:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 13:34:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 13:34:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 321 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11854671432800369699.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1262363213609668971.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11854671432800369699.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1262363213609668971.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,987785,1.14425,45796,1302,1854,39587,35105,289,139506,224,314270,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(AX(AG(((i0.u0.Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7>=1)||(i5.u13.Node15HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode5>=1)))) U !(A(EX(((i0.u0.Node0WantsTo...383
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.u0.Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7>=1)||(i5.u13.Node15HasTheLeafSetOfLxTo...767
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t14, t15, t19, t25, t31, t37, t38, t39, t44, t106, t124, t125, t130, t141, t176, t189, t1...1204
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,11.5385,372376,1,0,280317,192013,1771,1.7842e+06,1315,2.8624e+06,429395
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 69 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 69 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 577 transition count 784
Iterating global reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 577 transition count 784
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 186 place count 529 transition count 736
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 529 transition count 736
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 522 transition count 736
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 273 place count 490 transition count 704
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 490 transition count 704
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 14 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 476 transition count 704
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 343 place count 452 transition count 680
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 452 transition count 680
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 388 place count 431 transition count 659
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 431 transition count 659
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 430 place count 410 transition count 638
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 451 place count 410 transition count 638
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 513 place count 348 transition count 576
Iterating global reduction 2 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 575 place count 348 transition count 576
Discarding 99 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 99 rule applications. Total rules 674 place count 249 transition count 477
Iterating global reduction 2 with 99 rules applied. Total rules applied 773 place count 249 transition count 477
Applied a total of 773 rules in 86 ms. Remains 249 /646 variables (removed 397) and now considering 477/853 (removed 376) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:34:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 321 transitions (discarded 156 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 321 rows 249 cols
[2023-03-22 13:34:36] [INFO ] Computed 26 place invariants in 5 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned [31, 54, 60, 64, 79, 83, 88, 102, 141, 145, 159, 163, 174, 210, 231]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 130 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/646 places, 477/853 transitions.
Discarding 65 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 65 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 169 transition count 412
Iterating global reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 169 transition count 412
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 165 transition count 408
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 165 transition count 408
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 161 transition count 404
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 161 transition count 404
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 157 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 157 transition count 400
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 164 place count 147 transition count 390
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 147 transition count 390
Applied a total of 174 rules in 12 ms. Remains 147 /234 variables (removed 87) and now considering 390/477 (removed 87) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 196 transitions (discarded 194 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 147 cols
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 196 transitions (discarded 194 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 147/646 places, 390/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 411 ms. Remains : 147/646 places, 390/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 390 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7576888293069423272.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:34:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability85997091428712676.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7576888293069423272.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability85997091428712676.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.08654e+06,6.19001,192748,2,38412,5,695949,6,0,960,1.11279e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 13:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-22 13:35:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 13:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5409205930814454517.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5409205930814454517.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5409205930814454517.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5409205930814454517.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5409205930814454517.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 13:35:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 13:35:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 13:35:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 367 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2023-03-22 13:35:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 23 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:35:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3092187821099251348.gal : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 13:35:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14660532226228506686.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3092187821099251348.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14660532226228506686.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 72 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 72 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 574 transition count 781
Iterating global reduction 0 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 574 transition count 781
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 524 transition count 731
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 524 transition count 731
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 519 transition count 731
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 281 place count 487 transition count 699
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 487 transition count 699
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 18 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 469 transition count 699
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 358 place count 442 transition count 672
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 385 place count 442 transition count 672
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 407 place count 420 transition count 650
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 429 place count 420 transition count 650
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 451 place count 398 transition count 628
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 473 place count 398 transition count 628
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 525 place count 346 transition count 576
Iterating global reduction 2 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 577 place count 346 transition count 576
Discarding 121 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 121 rule applications. Total rules 698 place count 225 transition count 455
Iterating global reduction 2 with 121 rules applied. Total rules applied 819 place count 225 transition count 455
Applied a total of 819 rules in 58 ms. Remains 225 /646 variables (removed 421) and now considering 455/853 (removed 398) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 288 transitions (discarded 167 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 288 rows 225 cols
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned [29, 43, 47, 51, 55, 82, 94, 124, 176, 199, 203]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 214/646 places, 455/853 transitions.
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 160 transition count 401
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 160 transition count 401
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 159 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 159 transition count 400
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 158 transition count 399
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 158 transition count 399
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 157 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 157 transition count 398
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 153 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 153 transition count 394
Applied a total of 122 rules in 6 ms. Remains 153 /214 variables (removed 61) and now considering 394/455 (removed 61) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 212 transitions (discarded 182 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 212 rows 153 cols
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Computed 13 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 212 transitions (discarded 182 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 153/646 places, 394/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 377 ms. Remains : 153/646 places, 394/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 394 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability902111026384537286.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:35:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14108870707781308584.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability902111026384537286.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14108870707781308584.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.34118e+07,3.83786,121756,2,37843,5,403769,6,0,987,543447,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 13:36:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 13:36:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1238262138143770472.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1238262138143770472.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1238262138143770472.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1238262138143770472.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1238262138143770472.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 13:36:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 13:36:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 13:36:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 397 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:36:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:36:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5504374125497117103.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13895987459583325502.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5504374125497117103.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13895987459583325502.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 76 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 76 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 570 transition count 777
Iterating global reduction 0 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 570 transition count 777
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 517 transition count 724
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 517 transition count 724
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 510 transition count 724
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 301 place count 474 transition count 688
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 474 transition count 688
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 19 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 455 transition count 688
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 386 place count 425 transition count 658
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 425 transition count 658
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 442 place count 399 transition count 632
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 399 transition count 632
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 494 place count 373 transition count 606
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 520 place count 373 transition count 606
Discarding 67 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 67 rule applications. Total rules 587 place count 306 transition count 539
Iterating global reduction 2 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 654 place count 306 transition count 539
Discarding 142 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 142 rule applications. Total rules 796 place count 164 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 2 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 938 place count 164 transition count 397
Applied a total of 938 rules in 51 ms. Remains 164 /646 variables (removed 482) and now considering 397/853 (removed 456) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 196 transitions (discarded 201 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 164 cols
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [26, 31, 35, 40, 44, 50, 68, 75, 86, 92, 96, 100, 122, 134]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 150/646 places, 397/853 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 104 transition count 351
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 104 transition count 351
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 102 transition count 349
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 102 transition count 349
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 100 transition count 347
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 100 transition count 347
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 98 transition count 345
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 98 transition count 345
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 94 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 94 transition count 341
Applied a total of 112 rules in 5 ms. Remains 94 /150 variables (removed 56) and now considering 341/397 (removed 56) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 223 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 94 cols
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Computed 7 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 223 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 94/646 places, 341/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 290 ms. Remains : 94/646 places, 341/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 341 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13220945583969250717.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4310403106455749628.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13220945583969250717.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4310403106455749628.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.68704e+06,0.907719,36024,2,13181,5,138099,6,0,699,111809,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E((E(((Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode14>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode14>=1)) U (Node9ManageTheBreakDownOfNode16>=1)) * (N...513
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E((E(((Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode14>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode14>=1)) U (Node9Man...562
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t18, t19, t20, t21, t23, t24, t26, t28, t29, t30...1616
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,16.4446,520224,1,0,1009,2.74489e+06,717,371,4715,2.35555e+06,772
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 76 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 76 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 570 transition count 777
Iterating global reduction 0 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 570 transition count 777
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 516 transition count 723
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 516 transition count 723
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 509 transition count 723
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 302 place count 474 transition count 688
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 474 transition count 688
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 19 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 455 transition count 688
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 386 place count 425 transition count 658
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 425 transition count 658
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 442 place count 399 transition count 632
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 399 transition count 632
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 493 place count 374 transition count 607
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 518 place count 374 transition count 607
Discarding 66 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 66 rule applications. Total rules 584 place count 308 transition count 541
Iterating global reduction 2 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 650 place count 308 transition count 541
Discarding 132 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 132 rule applications. Total rules 782 place count 176 transition count 409
Iterating global reduction 2 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 914 place count 176 transition count 409
Applied a total of 914 rules in 57 ms. Remains 176 /646 variables (removed 470) and now considering 409/853 (removed 444) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 218 transitions (discarded 191 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 176 cols
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned [26, 44, 48, 67, 74, 85, 89, 95, 103, 122, 126, 137, 142, 146, 159, 163]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 99 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 160/646 places, 409/853 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 101 transition count 350
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 101 transition count 350
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 98 transition count 347
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 98 transition count 347
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 95 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 95 transition count 344
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 92 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 92 transition count 341
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 88 transition count 337
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 88 transition count 337
Applied a total of 144 rules in 4 ms. Remains 88 /160 variables (removed 72) and now considering 337/409 (removed 72) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 115 transitions (discarded 222 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 88 cols
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 115 transitions (discarded 222 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/646 places, 337/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 293 ms. Remains : 88/646 places, 337/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 337 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14905651396342979427.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:36:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6788446120582183518.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14905651396342979427.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6788446120582183518.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.24e+06,2.04411,69284,2,11827,5,288840,6,0,671,288194,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(EF(((Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode14>=1)||(Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1)))) U !(((((Node4IsActive>=1)&&(Node7DontAnswerTo...819
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(((((Node4IsActive>=1)&&(Node7DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) + !(((!(E(TRUE U !((Node12HasTheLeafSet...2917
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29...1676
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4646807288936524633.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4646807288936524633.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4646807288936524633.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4646807288936524633.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4646807288936524633.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 304 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 43 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10398198552051487832.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:37:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16567713418458636166.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10398198552051487832.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16567713418458636166.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.24e+06,2.34558,81232,2880,4564,69873,62517,369,235135,241,548049,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(EF(((i6.u11.Node4HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode14>=1)||(i4.i1.u13.Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1)))) U !(((((i6.u9.Node4IsActive>...940
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(((((i6.u9.Node4IsActive>=1)&&(u1.Node7DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) + !(((!(E(TRUE U !((i7.u22.Nod...3282
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t19, t21, t24, t28, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t40, t42, t43, t54, t83, t85, t86, t87, t88,...1459
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 77 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 77 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 569 transition count 776
Iterating global reduction 0 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 569 transition count 776
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 514 transition count 721
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 514 transition count 721
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 508 transition count 721
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 304 place count 474 transition count 687
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 474 transition count 687
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 21 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 453 transition count 687
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 389 place count 423 transition count 657
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 423 transition count 657
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 445 place count 397 transition count 631
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 471 place count 397 transition count 631
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 497 place count 371 transition count 605
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 523 place count 371 transition count 605
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 577 place count 317 transition count 551
Iterating global reduction 2 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 631 place count 317 transition count 551
Discarding 156 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 156 rule applications. Total rules 787 place count 161 transition count 395
Iterating global reduction 2 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 943 place count 161 transition count 395
Applied a total of 943 rules in 53 ms. Remains 161 /646 variables (removed 485) and now considering 395/853 (removed 458) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 194 transitions (discarded 201 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 161 cols
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned [26, 49, 53, 57, 62, 76, 80, 117, 125, 129, 133, 137, 148]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/646 places, 395/853 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 103 transition count 350
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 103 transition count 350
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 101 transition count 348
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 101 transition count 348
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 99 transition count 346
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 99 transition count 346
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 97 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 97 transition count 344
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 93 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 93 transition count 340
Applied a total of 110 rules in 4 ms. Remains 93 /148 variables (removed 55) and now considering 340/395 (removed 55) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 117 transitions (discarded 223 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 93 cols
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Computed 7 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 117 transitions (discarded 223 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/646 places, 340/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 278 ms. Remains : 93/646 places, 340/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:37:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 340 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:37:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:37:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:37:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15392534056623657765.gal : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 13:37:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8972952208622371805.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15392534056623657765.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8972952208622371805.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.40148e+06,1.94308,67608,2,14156,5,274601,6,0,694,259566,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(A((E(AX(((Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1))) U (Node16ManageTheBreakDownOfNode9<1)) + ...588
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY((Init * !(EX((!(E((LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode10>=1) U !(((Node1HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode10>=...1176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t19, t20, t21, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t29, t30...1556
(forward)formula 0,0,28.2124,816740,1,0,1068,4.07032e+06,718,420,4864,4.49582e+06,808
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 78 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 78 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 568 transition count 775
Iterating global reduction 0 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 568 transition count 775
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 210 place count 514 transition count 721
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 514 transition count 721
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 508 transition count 721
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 306 place count 472 transition count 685
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 472 transition count 685
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 21 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 363 place count 451 transition count 685
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 394 place count 420 transition count 654
Iterating global reduction 2 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 425 place count 420 transition count 654
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 451 place count 394 transition count 628
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 394 transition count 628
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 502 place count 369 transition count 603
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 527 place count 369 transition count 603
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 589 place count 307 transition count 541
Iterating global reduction 2 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 651 place count 307 transition count 541
Discarding 138 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 138 rule applications. Total rules 789 place count 169 transition count 403
Iterating global reduction 2 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 927 place count 169 transition count 403
Applied a total of 927 rules in 62 ms. Remains 169 /646 variables (removed 477) and now considering 403/853 (removed 450) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 212 transitions (discarded 191 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 212 rows 169 cols
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned [26, 31, 39, 43, 54, 70, 82, 89, 96, 100, 125, 130, 148, 152]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 90 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 155/646 places, 403/853 transitions.
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 101 transition count 349
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 101 transition count 349
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 99 transition count 347
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 99 transition count 347
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 97 transition count 345
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 97 transition count 345
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 95 transition count 343
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 95 transition count 343
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 92 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 92 transition count 340
Applied a total of 126 rules in 6 ms. Remains 92 /155 variables (removed 63) and now considering 340/403 (removed 63) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 216 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 92 cols
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 216 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/646 places, 340/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 281 ms. Remains : 92/646 places, 340/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 340 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability103669454231669724.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1181990124583958740.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability103669454231669724.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1181990124583958740.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.00788e+06,1.0882,44920,2,9036,5,156509,6,0,690,186710,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(A(AX(EF(((Node14HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode6>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode14>=1)))) U EG((((Node7IsActive>=1)&&(Node14DontAns...888
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * (!(!((E(!(EG((((Node7IsActive>=1)&&(Node14DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))&&((Node4IsActive>=1)&&(Node11DontA...2214
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t26, t28, t30...1645
(forward)formula 0,0,22.153,629564,1,0,1113,3.576e+06,717,424,4757,3.40987e+06,876
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 77 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 77 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 569 transition count 776
Iterating global reduction 0 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 569 transition count 776
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 515 transition count 722
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 515 transition count 722
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 508 transition count 722
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 474 transition count 688
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 474 transition count 688
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 20 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 357 place count 454 transition count 688
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 385 place count 426 transition count 660
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 426 transition count 660
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 439 place count 400 transition count 634
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 465 place count 400 transition count 634
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 491 place count 374 transition count 608
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 517 place count 374 transition count 608
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 577 place count 314 transition count 548
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 637 place count 314 transition count 548
Discarding 147 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 147 rule applications. Total rules 784 place count 167 transition count 401
Iterating global reduction 2 with 147 rules applied. Total rules applied 931 place count 167 transition count 401
Applied a total of 931 rules in 52 ms. Remains 167 /646 variables (removed 479) and now considering 401/853 (removed 452) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 204 transitions (discarded 197 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 167 cols
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Computed 20 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned [30, 46, 50, 95, 100, 106, 126, 135, 139, 143, 154]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 156/646 places, 401/853 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 116 transition count 361
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 116 transition count 361
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 115 transition count 360
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 115 transition count 360
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 114 transition count 359
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 114 transition count 359
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 113 transition count 358
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 113 transition count 358
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 110 transition count 355
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 110 transition count 355
Applied a total of 92 rules in 5 ms. Remains 110 /156 variables (removed 46) and now considering 355/401 (removed 46) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 211 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 144 rows 110 cols
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 211 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 110/646 places, 355/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 298 ms. Remains : 110/646 places, 355/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 355 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16258620681333312637.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:38:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11075265508235271401.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16258620681333312637.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11075265508235271401.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.04402e+06,2.93168,98000,2,18708,5,392239,6,0,777,466741,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((E(!(AX(((Node4DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node10IsActive>=1)))) U (((Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode13>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBrea...884
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((E(!(!(EX(!(((Node4DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node10IsActive>=1)))))) U (((Node4WantsToManageTheBr...935
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t25, t26, t28, t29, t30, t31, t3...1519
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 13:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-22 13:39:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 13:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph488807389324092174.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph488807389324092174.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph488807389324092174.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph488807389324092174.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph488807389324092174.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 13:39:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 13:39:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 13:39:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 352 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-22 13:39:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 45 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:39:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4616623941472912819.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:39:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8461665881243575245.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4616623941472912819.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8461665881243575245.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.04402e+06,4.69384,133160,4839,2450,147838,45627,524,481456,216,725456,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((E(!(AX(((i5.u14.Node4DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(i7.u19.Node10IsActive>=1)))) U (((i8.u21.Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode13>=1)&...1016
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((E(!(!(EX(!(((i5.u14.Node4DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(i7.u19.Node10IsActive>=1)))))) U (((i8.u21.No...1067
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t12, t14, t28, t29, t30, t43, t46, t52, t53, t65, t69, t70, t80, t82, t86, t87, t97, t98,...1344
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 73 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 73 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 573 transition count 780
Iterating global reduction 0 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 573 transition count 780
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 198 place count 521 transition count 728
Iterating global reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 521 transition count 728
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 514 transition count 728
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 290 place count 481 transition count 695
Iterating global reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 481 transition count 695
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 17 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 464 transition count 695
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 368 place count 436 transition count 667
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 436 transition count 667
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 420 place count 412 transition count 643
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 444 place count 412 transition count 643
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 468 place count 388 transition count 619
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 492 place count 388 transition count 619
Discarding 64 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 64 rule applications. Total rules 556 place count 324 transition count 555
Iterating global reduction 2 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 620 place count 324 transition count 555
Discarding 123 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 123 rule applications. Total rules 743 place count 201 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 2 with 123 rules applied. Total rules applied 866 place count 201 transition count 432
Applied a total of 866 rules in 50 ms. Remains 201 /646 variables (removed 445) and now considering 432/853 (removed 421) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 249 transitions (discarded 183 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 249 rows 201 cols
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned [13, 28, 43, 48, 53, 57, 61, 91, 95, 132, 138, 142, 155, 174, 186]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 102 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/646 places, 432/853 transitions.
Discarding 58 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 58 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 128 transition count 374
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 128 transition count 374
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 125 transition count 371
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 125 transition count 371
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 122 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 122 transition count 368
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 119 transition count 365
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 119 transition count 365
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 114 transition count 360
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 114 transition count 360
Applied a total of 144 rules in 5 ms. Remains 114 /186 variables (removed 72) and now considering 360/432 (removed 72) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 146 transitions (discarded 214 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 114 cols
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 146 transitions (discarded 214 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 114/646 places, 360/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 305 ms. Remains : 114/646 places, 360/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 360 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16047405926698844060.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:39:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14874277756420941792.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16047405926698844060.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14874277756420941792.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.13333e+06,1.38792,47964,2,17180,5,175899,6,0,798,160100,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode15>=1)&&(Node6DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) * ((Node8IsActive>=1) * ((A(((Node2WantsToManageTheBrea...937
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode15>=1)&&(Node6DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) * ((Node8IsActive>=1...1107
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t18, t19, t20, t21, t23, t25, t28, t30, t31, t32...1648
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 13:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 13:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3515971612852107009.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3515971612852107009.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3515971612852107009.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3515971612852107009.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3515971612852107009.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 13:40:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 13:40:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 13:40:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 341 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:40:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11143899834131833017.gal : 8 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8674781476895714330.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11143899834131833017.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8674781476895714330.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.13333e+06,7.78015,209752,7137,3661,222860,58234,503,856442,231,1.34591e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((i2.u14.Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode15>=1)&&(u0.Node6DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) * ((i2.u15.Node8IsActive>=1) * ((A(((i3.u3.No...1067
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((i2.u14.Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode15>=1)&&(u0.Node6DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) * ((i2.u15...1251
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t14, t18, t21, t56, t59, t63, t74, t77, t81, t100, t107, t108, t109, t119, t124, t125, t...1477
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1918 edges and 646 vertex of which 644 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions removed 111 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 111 transitions
Performed 111 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 111
Iterating post reduction 0 with 111 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 644 transition count 740
Reduce places removed 111 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 111 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 533 transition count 740
Performed 31 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 31 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 533 transition count 709
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 502 transition count 709
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 317 place count 470 transition count 677
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 349 place count 470 transition count 677
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 353 place count 466 transition count 673
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 357 place count 466 transition count 673
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 465 transition count 673
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 465 transition count 672
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 360 place count 464 transition count 672
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 361 place count 463 transition count 671
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 362 place count 463 transition count 671
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 363 place count 462 transition count 670
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 462 transition count 670
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 367 place count 459 transition count 667
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 370 place count 459 transition count 667
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 506 place count 391 transition count 599
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 536 place count 361 transition count 569
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 566 place count 361 transition count 569
Applied a total of 566 rules in 106 ms. Remains 361 /646 variables (removed 285) and now considering 569/853 (removed 284) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 558 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 558 rows 361 cols
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned [3, 10, 20, 23, 30, 40, 49, 59, 62, 78, 81, 88, 98, 101, 109, 121, 128, 138, 141, 148, 158, 161, 169, 181, 188, 198, 205, 216, 225, 228, 235, 246, 249, 256, 266, 269, 276, 286, 289, 296, 306, 309, 316, 326]
Discarding 44 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 229 ms to find 44 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 317/646 places, 569/853 transitions.
Discarding 210 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 210 rule applications. Total rules 210 place count 107 transition count 359
Iterating global reduction 0 with 210 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 107 transition count 359
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 448 place count 79 transition count 331
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 476 place count 79 transition count 331
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 504 place count 51 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 532 place count 51 transition count 303
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 544 place count 45 transition count 297
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 546 place count 43 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 548 place count 43 transition count 295
Applied a total of 548 rules in 15 ms. Remains 43 /317 variables (removed 274) and now considering 295/569 (removed 274) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 42 transitions (discarded 253 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 43 cols
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 42 transitions (discarded 253 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 43/646 places, 295/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 447 ms. Remains : 43/646 places, 295/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 295 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7120677085699014180.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9394319597972043006.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7120677085699014180.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9394319597972043006.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,39992,0.087703,6832,2,1040,5,21450,6,0,450,8194,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((Node12ManageTheBreakDownOfNode11<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(Node12ManageTheBreakDownOfNode11<1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 293/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.316003,15016,1,0,21,62906,18,2,1914,34455,20
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1918 edges and 646 vertex of which 644 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions removed 108 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 108 transitions
Performed 108 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 108
Iterating post reduction 0 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 644 transition count 743
Reduce places removed 108 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 536 transition count 741
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 534 transition count 741
Performed 31 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 31 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 534 transition count 710
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 503 transition count 710
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 314 place count 472 transition count 679
Iterating global reduction 3 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 472 transition count 679
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 348 place count 469 transition count 676
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 469 transition count 676
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 468 transition count 676
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 468 transition count 675
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 467 transition count 675
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 355 place count 466 transition count 674
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 466 transition count 674
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 357 place count 465 transition count 673
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 465 transition count 673
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 361 place count 462 transition count 670
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 462 transition count 670
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 500 place count 394 transition count 602
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 529 place count 365 transition count 573
Iterating global reduction 4 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 558 place count 365 transition count 573
Applied a total of 558 rules in 90 ms. Remains 365 /646 variables (removed 281) and now considering 573/853 (removed 280) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 562 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 562 rows 365 cols
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 220 ms returned [3, 10, 20, 23, 30, 40, 49, 59, 62, 78, 81, 88, 98, 101, 109, 121, 128, 138, 141, 148, 158, 161, 169, 181, 188, 198, 205, 216, 225, 228, 235, 245, 248, 255, 265, 268, 287, 290, 297, 307, 310, 330]
Discarding 42 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 222 ms to find 42 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 323/646 places, 573/853 transitions.
Discarding 208 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 208 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 115 transition count 365
Iterating global reduction 0 with 208 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 115 transition count 365
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 442 place count 89 transition count 339
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 89 transition count 339
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 494 place count 63 transition count 313
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 520 place count 63 transition count 313
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 538 place count 54 transition count 304
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 540 place count 52 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 542 place count 52 transition count 302
Applied a total of 542 rules in 12 ms. Remains 52 /323 variables (removed 271) and now considering 302/573 (removed 271) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 238 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 52 cols
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 238 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/646 places, 302/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 429 ms. Remains : 52/646 places, 302/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1912016800425444937.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10436334886276017403.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1912016800425444937.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10436334886276017403.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,133202,0.297121,15352,2,5010,5,63800,6,0,493,35735,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((Node16HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode16>=1)) U AF(!(AF(AG((Node14HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode16>...163
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((Node14HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode16>=1))))))))))))))) * !(E(!(...428
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t11, t16, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43...1731
(forward)formula 0,1,3.65825,132844,1,0,915,833225,633,315,3233,651894,651
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 72 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 72 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 574 transition count 781
Iterating global reduction 0 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 574 transition count 781
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 524 transition count 731
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 524 transition count 731
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 520 transition count 731
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 282 place count 486 transition count 697
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 486 transition count 697
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 22 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 464 transition count 697
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 368 place count 434 transition count 667
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 434 transition count 667
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 423 place count 409 transition count 642
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 448 place count 409 transition count 642
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 473 place count 384 transition count 617
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 498 place count 384 transition count 617
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 546 place count 336 transition count 569
Iterating global reduction 2 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 594 place count 336 transition count 569
Discarding 150 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 150 rule applications. Total rules 744 place count 186 transition count 419
Iterating global reduction 2 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 894 place count 186 transition count 419
Applied a total of 894 rules in 61 ms. Remains 186 /646 variables (removed 460) and now considering 419/853 (removed 434) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 233 transitions (discarded 186 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 186 cols
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [26, 30, 37, 44, 82, 87, 125, 137, 153, 158, 163, 168]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 174/646 places, 419/853 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 128 transition count 373
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 128 transition count 373
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 127 transition count 372
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 127 transition count 372
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 126 transition count 371
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 126 transition count 371
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 125 transition count 370
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 125 transition count 370
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 122 transition count 367
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 122 transition count 367
Applied a total of 104 rules in 5 ms. Remains 122 /174 variables (removed 52) and now considering 367/419 (removed 52) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 164 transitions (discarded 203 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 164 rows 122 cols
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 164 transitions (discarded 203 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 122/646 places, 367/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 313 ms. Remains : 122/646 places, 367/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 367 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2905245058137763993.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:40:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16892212010771501935.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2905245058137763993.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16892212010771501935.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.3729e+06,1.98716,69220,2,27082,5,237261,6,0,837,249631,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(((EF((Node9ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<1)) * EX(AF((Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1)))) + ((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1)&&(No...1241
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode9>=1)) U (!((!((((EX(((Node15WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNo...2479
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30...1624
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 13:41:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-22 13:41:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 13:41:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12595076649144653299.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12595076649144653299.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12595076649144653299.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12595076649144653299.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12595076649144653299.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 13:41:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 13:41:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 13:41:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 367 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:41:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-22 13:41:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:41:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7219136836531176403.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:41:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12218243035663212008.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7219136836531176403.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12218243035663212008.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.3729e+06,15.2875,449708,8634,4339,422471,52503,590,3.65557e+06,215,792364,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(((EF((i6.i0.u19.Node9ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<1)) * EX(AF((i4.i1.u7.Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1)))) + ((i4.i0.u1.NoNodeManage...1438
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((i3.u5.Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode9>=1)) U (!((!((((EX(((i3.u2.Node15WantsToManageTheB...2657
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:213)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 75 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 75 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 571 transition count 778
Iterating global reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 571 transition count 778
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 519 transition count 726
Iterating global reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 519 transition count 726
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 512 transition count 726
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 294 place count 479 transition count 693
Iterating global reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 479 transition count 693
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 19 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 346 place count 460 transition count 693
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 375 place count 431 transition count 664
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 431 transition count 664
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 429 place count 406 transition count 639
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 454 place count 406 transition count 639
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 479 place count 381 transition count 614
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 504 place count 381 transition count 614
Discarding 67 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 67 rule applications. Total rules 571 place count 314 transition count 547
Iterating global reduction 2 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 638 place count 314 transition count 547
Discarding 133 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 133 rule applications. Total rules 771 place count 181 transition count 414
Iterating global reduction 2 with 133 rules applied. Total rules applied 904 place count 181 transition count 414
Applied a total of 904 rules in 47 ms. Remains 181 /646 variables (removed 465) and now considering 414/853 (removed 439) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 221 transitions (discarded 193 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 221 rows 181 cols
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Computed 21 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [26, 30, 34, 42, 63, 95, 127, 133, 137, 145, 162]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 170/646 places, 414/853 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 124 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 124 transition count 368
Applied a total of 92 rules in 2 ms. Remains 124 /170 variables (removed 46) and now considering 368/414 (removed 46) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 165 transitions (discarded 203 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 165 rows 124 cols
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 165 transitions (discarded 203 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 124/646 places, 368/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 294 ms. Remains : 124/646 places, 368/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:41:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 368 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:41:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5335292241409544315.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:41:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17895867080892482447.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5335292241409544315.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17895867080892482447.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.20216e+06,1.77284,59744,2,20144,5,206866,6,0,846,237673,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((AG((!(EX((RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode8>=1))) + E((Node15ManageTheBreakDownOfNode11<1) U (((Node7IsActive>=1)&&(Node10DontAnswerToAny...1062
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(!(EG(!(((Node9DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node13IsActive>=1)))))) + ((Node10DontAnswerToAnyNod...1421
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t19, t20, t21, t23, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30...1608
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 13:42:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 13:42:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9410056631430619896.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9410056631430619896.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9410056631430619896.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9410056631430619896.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9410056631430619896.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 13:42:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 13:42:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 13:42:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 346 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:42:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 51 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:42:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5782397297368835116.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18045484029972362669.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5782397297368835116.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18045484029972362669.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.20216e+06,11.1452,300388,7044,2463,375527,36377,501,1.87947e+06,220,537641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((AG((!(EX((i7.i1.u26.RxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode8>=1))) + E((i7.i0.u18.Node15ManageTheBreakDownOfNode11<1) U (((i3.u9.Node7IsActive>=...1232
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(!(EG(!(((u21.Node9DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(u21.Node13IsActive>=1)))))) + ((u21.Node10DontAn...1623
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t13, t15, t19, t27, t72, t90, t118, t120, t122, t129, t132, t146, t148, t150, t156, t166,...1338
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 78 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 78 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 568 transition count 775
Iterating global reduction 0 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 568 transition count 775
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 515 transition count 722
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 515 transition count 722
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 508 transition count 722
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 305 place count 472 transition count 686
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 472 transition count 686
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 21 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 362 place count 451 transition count 686
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 394 place count 419 transition count 654
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 419 transition count 654
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 454 place count 391 transition count 626
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 482 place count 391 transition count 626
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 510 place count 363 transition count 598
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 538 place count 363 transition count 598
Discarding 70 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 70 rule applications. Total rules 608 place count 293 transition count 528
Iterating global reduction 2 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 678 place count 293 transition count 528
Discarding 156 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 156 rule applications. Total rules 834 place count 137 transition count 372
Iterating global reduction 2 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 990 place count 137 transition count 372
Applied a total of 990 rules in 59 ms. Remains 137 /646 variables (removed 509) and now considering 372/853 (removed 481) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 156 transitions (discarded 216 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 137 cols
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned [26, 30, 34, 38, 54, 61, 65, 71, 77, 81, 98, 103, 122, 126]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 87 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/646 places, 372/853 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 82 transition count 331
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 82 transition count 331
Applied a total of 82 rules in 1 ms. Remains 82 /123 variables (removed 41) and now considering 331/372 (removed 41) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 228 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 82 cols
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 228 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 82/646 places, 331/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 275 ms. Remains : 82/646 places, 331/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 331 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13535511264001386135.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5287226401754372835.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13535511264001386135.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5287226401754372835.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.43436e+06,0.603157,27884,2,5628,5,103422,6,0,641,87287,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(E(AG(((EF(((Node15HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode7>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode15>=1))) * (Node15ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6>=1))...294
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(((E(TRUE U ((Node15HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode7>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToN...369
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t26, t27, t28, t29...1738
(forward)formula 0,1,4.22811,136496,1,0,953,824032,690,343,4302,699458,693
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 646/646 places, 853/853 transitions.
Discarding 79 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 79 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 567 transition count 774
Iterating global reduction 0 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 567 transition count 774
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 511 transition count 718
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 511 transition count 718
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 504 transition count 718
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 313 place count 468 transition count 682
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 349 place count 468 transition count 682
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 22 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 446 transition count 682
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 404 place count 413 transition count 649
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 437 place count 413 transition count 649
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 466 place count 384 transition count 620
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 495 place count 384 transition count 620
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 524 place count 355 transition count 591
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 553 place count 355 transition count 591
Discarding 71 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 71 rule applications. Total rules 624 place count 284 transition count 520
Iterating global reduction 2 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 695 place count 284 transition count 520
Discarding 161 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 161 rule applications. Total rules 856 place count 123 transition count 359
Iterating global reduction 2 with 161 rules applied. Total rules applied 1017 place count 123 transition count 359
Applied a total of 1017 rules in 58 ms. Remains 123 /646 variables (removed 523) and now considering 359/853 (removed 494) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:42:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 136 transitions (discarded 223 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 123 cols
[2023-03-22 13:42:58] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned [26, 30, 34, 38, 63, 67, 73, 79, 83, 87, 100, 104, 108, 113]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 81 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/646 places, 359/853 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 74 transition count 324
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 74 transition count 324
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 73 transition count 323
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 73 transition count 323
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 72 transition count 322
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 72 transition count 322
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 71 transition count 321
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 71 transition count 321
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 69 transition count 319
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 69 transition count 319
Applied a total of 80 rules in 4 ms. Remains 69 /109 variables (removed 40) and now considering 319/359 (removed 40) transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:42:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 241 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 69 cols
[2023-03-22 13:42:58] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2023-03-22 13:42:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 241 similar events)
[2023-03-22 13:42:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-22 13:42:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 69/646 places, 319/853 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 252 ms. Remains : 69/646 places, 319/853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:42:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 319 transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:42:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability550228691798354363.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-22 13:42:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7954087884408909930.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability550228691798354363.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7954087884408909930.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,944268,0.573188,25880,2,6308,5,105975,6,0,577,83898,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(!((((Node10DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node16IsActive>=1))&&(!((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1)&&(Node16WantsToManageTheBreakDownO...327
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !((((Node10DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node16IsActive>=1))&&(!((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNod...391
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29...1659
(forward)formula 0,1,6.68025,205508,1,0,938,1.0246e+06,668,329,4044,1.0104e+06,685
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2023-03-22 13:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2023-03-22 13:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2023-03-22 13:43:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-22 13:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6589355796687131504.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6589355796687131504.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6589355796687131504.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6589355796687131504.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6589355796687131504.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-22 13:43:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-22 13:43:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-22 13:43:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 755 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-22 13:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2023-03-22 13:43:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 128 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2023-03-22 13:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12768821314654154960.gal : 7 ms
[2023-03-22 13:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2282098597692674942.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12768821314654154960.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2282098597692674942.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 14:06:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 154 ms
[2023-03-22 14:06:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10206119376586453211.gal : 41 ms
[2023-03-22 14:06:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4203195157205807301.ctl : 12 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10206119376586453211.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4203195157205807301.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-22 14:30:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 164 ms
[2023-03-22 14:30:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 853 transitions.
[2023-03-22 14:30:44] [INFO ] Transformed 646 places.
[2023-03-22 14:30:45] [INFO ] Transformed 853 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2023-03-22 14:30:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14993287498469506717.gal : 12 ms
[2023-03-22 14:30:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2964952750376706606.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14993287498469506717.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2964952750376706606.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
TIME LIMIT: Killed by timeout after 3600 seconds
MemTotal: 16393216 kB
MemFree: 11536040 kB
After kill :
MemTotal: 16393216 kB
MemFree: 16063848 kB

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r229-tall-167856413300482"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3.tgz
mv LeafsetExtension-PT-S16C3 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;