Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.r101-tall-167814475200298.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2023-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5348
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r101-tall-167814475200298
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 2.0M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K Feb 26 15:29 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K Feb 26 15:29 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K Feb 26 15:27 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Feb 26 15:27 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Feb 25 15:49 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Feb 25 15:49 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Feb 25 15:49 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Feb 25 15:49 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Feb 26 15:31 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 108K Feb 26 15:31 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K Feb 26 15:30 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K Feb 26 15:30 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Feb 25 15:49 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Feb 25 15:49 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Mar 5 18:22 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6M Mar 5 18:22 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1678248389929

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202303021504
[2023-03-08 04:06:31] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2023-03-08 04:06:31] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2023-03-08 04:06:31] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 225 ms
[2023-03-08 04:06:31] [INFO ] Transformed 4763 places.
[2023-03-08 04:06:31] [INFO ] Transformed 2478 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:06:31] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 4763 places and 2478 transitions and 9912 arcs in 515 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 3580 places in 16 ms
Reduce places removed 3580 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 108 out of 1183 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1183/1183 places, 2478/2478 transitions.
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 199 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 199 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 245 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 1137 transition count 2279
Discarding 345 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 345 rule applications. Total rules 590 place count 792 transition count 1626
Iterating global reduction 1 with 345 rules applied. Total rules applied 935 place count 792 transition count 1626
Ensure Unique test removed 66 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 66 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 1001 place count 792 transition count 1560
Discarding 263 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 263 rule applications. Total rules 1264 place count 529 transition count 1297
Iterating global reduction 2 with 263 rules applied. Total rules applied 1527 place count 529 transition count 1297
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 1529 place count 529 transition count 1295
Discarding 187 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 187 rule applications. Total rules 1716 place count 342 transition count 1050
Iterating global reduction 3 with 187 rules applied. Total rules applied 1903 place count 342 transition count 1050
Ensure Unique test removed 247 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 247 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 247 rules applied. Total rules applied 2150 place count 342 transition count 803
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 2154 place count 338 transition count 798
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 2158 place count 338 transition count 798
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2160 place count 336 transition count 796
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2162 place count 336 transition count 796
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2164 place count 334 transition count 794
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2166 place count 334 transition count 794
Applied a total of 2166 rules in 193 ms. Remains 334 /1183 variables (removed 849) and now considering 794/2478 (removed 1684) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 794 rows 334 cols
[2023-03-08 04:06:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 28 ms
[2023-03-08 04:06:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 381 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:06:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:06:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 466 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:06:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1457 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1865 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:06:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:06:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 280 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 334/1183 places, 794/2478 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2339 ms. Remains : 334/1183 places, 794/2478 transitions.
Support contains 108 out of 334 places after structural reductions.
[2023-03-08 04:06:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 86 ms
[2023-03-08 04:06:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2023-03-08 04:06:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 794 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2318 resets, run finished after 617 ms. (steps per millisecond=16 ) properties (out of 92) seen :6
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 87 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 35 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 90 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 36 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 31 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 92 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 78 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 86) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 86) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 86 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 85) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 92 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 85) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 85) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 85) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 85) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 85) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 85) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 34 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 85) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 85) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 88 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 78 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 91 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 36 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 94 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 83 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 94 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 90 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 116 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 108 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 84) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 84) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 83) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 83 properties.
[2023-03-08 04:06:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:06:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 04:06:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 04:06:37] [INFO ] After 676ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:83
[2023-03-08 04:06:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 04:06:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 04:06:48] [INFO ] After 9685ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :80
[2023-03-08 04:06:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 466 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:07:02] [INFO ] After 14421ms SMT Verify possible using 466 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :79
[2023-03-08 04:07:02] [INFO ] After 14423ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :79
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 2 ms.
[2023-03-08 04:07:02] [INFO ] After 25012ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :79
Fused 83 Parikh solutions to 80 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 10 properties in 561 ms.
Support contains 77 out of 334 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 315 transition count 696
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 315 transition count 696
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 315 transition count 689
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 299 transition count 666
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 299 transition count 666
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 299 transition count 661
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 285 transition count 640
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 285 transition count 640
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 285 transition count 632
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 280 transition count 625
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 280 transition count 625
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 280 transition count 607
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 279 transition count 606
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 279 transition count 606
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 278 transition count 604
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 278 transition count 604
Applied a total of 150 rules in 134 ms. Remains 278 /334 variables (removed 56) and now considering 604/794 (removed 190) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 134 ms. Remains : 278/334 places, 604/794 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2270 resets, run finished after 319 ms. (steps per millisecond=31 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 60 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 83 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 96 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 90 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 99 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 90 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 96 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 93 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 85 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 109 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 94 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 70) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 690112 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=229 ) properties seen :{0=1, 1=1, 2=1, 3=1, 4=1, 5=1, 6=1, 7=1, 8=1, 10=1, 11=1, 12=1, 13=1, 14=1, 15=1, 16=1, 17=1, 18=1, 19=1, 20=1, 21=1, 22=1, 23=1, 24=1, 25=1, 26=1, 27=1, 28=1, 29=1, 30=1, 31=1, 32=1, 33=1, 34=1, 35=1, 36=1, 37=1, 38=1, 39=1, 40=1, 41=1, 42=1, 43=1, 44=1, 45=1, 46=1, 47=1, 48=1, 49=1, 50=1, 51=1, 52=1, 53=1, 54=1, 55=1, 56=1, 57=1, 58=1, 59=1, 60=1, 61=1, 62=1, 63=1, 64=1, 65=1, 66=1, 67=1, 68=1, 69=1}
Probabilistic random walk after 690112 steps, saw 263547 distinct states, run finished after 3002 ms. (steps per millisecond=229 ) properties seen :69
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 604 rows 278 cols
[2023-03-08 04:07:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 11 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 04:07:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 04:07:07] [INFO ] After 266ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
[2023-03-08 04:07:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 04:07:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2023-03-08 04:07:07] [INFO ] After 202ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2023-03-08 04:07:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 337 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:07:07] [INFO ] After 204ms SMT Verify possible using 337 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2023-03-08 04:07:08] [INFO ] After 330ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 121 ms.
[2023-03-08 04:07:08] [INFO ] After 715ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 278 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 604/604 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1068 edges and 278 vertex of which 277 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 277 transition count 595
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 223 transition count 412
Iterating global reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 223 transition count 412
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 223 transition count 402
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 183 transition count 349
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 183 transition count 349
Ensure Unique test removed 21 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 21 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 183 transition count 328
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 252 place count 160 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 160 transition count 296
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 160 transition count 282
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 301 place count 148 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 148 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 148 transition count 256
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 325 place count 139 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 139 transition count 247
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 139 transition count 239
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 353 place count 128 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 6 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 128 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 128 transition count 190
Applied a total of 368 rules in 51 ms. Remains 128 /278 variables (removed 150) and now considering 190/604 (removed 414) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 51 ms. Remains : 128/278 places, 190/604 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2295 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=588 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 450 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=1428 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 27525 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 46 ms. (steps per millisecond=598 )
Probabilistic random walk after 27525 steps, saw 13387 distinct states, run finished after 47 ms. (steps per millisecond=585 ) properties seen :1
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2023-03-08 04:07:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 794 transitions.
Support contains 97 out of 334 places (down from 99) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 50 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1449 edges and 334 vertex of which 333 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 69 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 69 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 265 transition count 518
Iterating global reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 265 transition count 518
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 265 transition count 504
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 213 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 1 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 213 transition count 432
Ensure Unique test removed 26 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 26 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 213 transition count 406
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 316 place count 179 transition count 356
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 350 place count 179 transition count 356
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 179 transition count 338
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 383 place count 164 transition count 312
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 164 transition count 312
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 164 transition count 297
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 420 place count 157 transition count 290
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 427 place count 157 transition count 290
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 435 place count 157 transition count 282
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 443 place count 149 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 451 place count 149 transition count 245
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 149 transition count 243
Applied a total of 453 rules in 23 ms. Remains 149 /334 variables (removed 185) and now considering 243/794 (removed 551) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 149 cols
[2023-03-08 04:07:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:07:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:07:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 102 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:07:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 364 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 469 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:07:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:07:09] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 118 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/334 places, 243/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 611 ms. Remains : 149/334 places, 243/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:07:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 243 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:07:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5747489311118498662.gal : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5374037806109801177.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5747489311118498662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5374037806109801177.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,510782,11.3108,301932,2,25127,5,704117,6,0,839,983586,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AX((EF(((s1<1)||(l4272<1))) * EF(((s1<1)||(l4103<1))))) + (EG(EX(((p105<1)||(l0<1)))) * ((s1<1)||(l4123<1)))) + ((AF(EG(((s1<1)||(l3...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EX(!((E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l4272<1))) * E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l4103<1))))))) + (EG(EX(((p105<1)||(l0<1...258
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t69, t70, t74, t75, t76, t84, t85, t86, t88, t89, t90, t91, t92, t93, t...897
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 04:07:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 04:07:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6733167771153820912.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6733167771153820912.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6733167771153820912.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6733167771153820912.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6733167771153820912.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 04:07:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 04:07:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 04:07:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 324 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:07:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 169 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2023-03-08 04:07:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8588333394865013739.gal : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17279166064538625866.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8588333394865013739.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17279166064538625866.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,510782,4.6493,149640,2708,1816,115634,32367,630,1.09786e+06,224,285120,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AX((EF(((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i6.u24.l4272<1))) * EF(((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i7.u20.l4103<1))))) + (EG(EX(((i0.u8.p105<1)||(i2.u2.l0<1)))) * ((i0.u...267
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EX(!((E(TRUE U ((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i6.u24.l4272<1))) * E(TRUE U ((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i7.u20.l4103<1)))))))...334
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t13, t14, t68, t84, t101, t109, t112, t113, t115, t120, t134, t135, t137, t140, t159,...748
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,18.528,497068,1,0,332951,79709,2884,4.21918e+06,1114,774484,1037088
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 74 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 74 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 260 transition count 473
Iterating global reduction 0 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 260 transition count 473
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 260 transition count 462
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 215 place count 204 transition count 386
Iterating global reduction 1 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 204 transition count 386
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 25 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 204 transition count 361
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 334 place count 166 transition count 306
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 166 transition count 306
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 166 transition count 288
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 408 place count 148 transition count 253
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 148 transition count 253
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 437 place count 148 transition count 242
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 447 place count 138 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 138 transition count 232
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 464 place count 138 transition count 225
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 475 place count 127 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 5 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 127 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 490 place count 127 transition count 182
Applied a total of 490 rules in 52 ms. Remains 127 /334 variables (removed 207) and now considering 182/794 (removed 612) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 182 rows 127 cols
[2023-03-08 04:07:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 378 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:07:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:07:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 61 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 358 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 739 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 7 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 107 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/334 places, 182/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 922 ms. Remains : 127/334 places, 182/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 182 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2275 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=322 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 991 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=1000 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16773876070036349951.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15399848499278727798.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16773876070036349951.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15399848499278727798.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
Finished probabilistic random walk after 16652 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=520 )
Probabilistic random walk after 16652 steps, saw 8205 distinct states, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=520 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
ITS runner failed with exception null
java.lang.InterruptedException
at java.base/java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1304)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1372)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.AbstractRunner.join(AbstractRunner.java:27)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner.join(ITSRunner.java:177)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.global.GlobalPropertySolver.verifyWithSDD(GlobalPropertySolver.java:675)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.ReachabilitySolver.lambda$2(ReachabilitySolver.java:63)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 67 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 67 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 267 transition count 514
Iterating global reduction 0 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 267 transition count 514
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 267 transition count 499
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 198 place count 218 transition count 431
Iterating global reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 218 transition count 431
Ensure Unique test removed 23 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 23 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 218 transition count 408
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 302 place count 186 transition count 362
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 186 transition count 362
Ensure Unique test removed 20 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 20 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 186 transition count 342
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 368 place count 172 transition count 313
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 172 transition count 313
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 172 transition count 303
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 401 place count 163 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 163 transition count 294
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 163 transition count 286
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 424 place count 157 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 157 transition count 279
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 433 place count 157 transition count 276
Applied a total of 433 rules in 15 ms. Remains 157 /334 variables (removed 177) and now considering 276/794 (removed 518) transitions.
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15399848499278727798.prop.
// Phase 1: matrix 276 rows 157 cols
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 24
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :24 after 56
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :56 after 88
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :88 after 152
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :152 after 246
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :246 after 470
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :470 after 1211
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1211 after 3418
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 129 read => feed constraints.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :3418 after 15007
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 411 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 507 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:07:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 106 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 157/334 places, 276/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 629 ms. Remains : 157/334 places, 276/794 transitions.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :15007 after 40608
[2023-03-08 04:08:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 276 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:08:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14879777393050112681.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13360200850565766597.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14879777393050112681.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13360200850565766597.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Reachability property DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-01 is true.
Found states matching all0 target predicate
Will report total states built up to this point. Computation was interrupted after 4097 fixpoint passes
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,69842,1.34266,50564,2,13862,17,132742,6,0,690,132981,0
Total reachable state count : 69842

Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Reachability property DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-01 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-01,3,1.34381,50564,2,137,17,132742,7,0,694,132981,0
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,343658,9.58334,260624,2,25402,5,618074,6,0,904,640403,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((((s1<1)||(l2690<1)) * ((EG(((p410>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l2464>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l2275>=1)))) * (AG(((s1>=1)&&(l3089>=1))) + ...346
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !((EX(((s1<1)||(l3091<1))) * EX((!(E(TRUE U !(((p293<1)||(l0<1))))) + (!(!((E(!(((p183>=1)&&(l0>=1...499
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t50, t51, t52, t53, t78, t80, t81, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, t...1041
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 04:08:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 04:08:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5145253158254429383.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5145253158254429383.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5145253158254429383.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5145253158254429383.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5145253158254429383.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 04:08:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 04:08:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 04:08:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 249 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:08:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 163 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2023-03-08 04:08:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11176638693311009670.gal : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12005925177450098702.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11176638693311009670.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12005925177450098702.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,343658,1.90482,71304,2070,2686,69491,59582,620,146155,296,358094,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i4.u11.l2690<1)) * ((EG(((i9.u17.p410>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1))) + ((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i4.u11.l2464>=1))) + ((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&...491
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !((EX(((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i4.u16.l3091<1))) * EX((!(E(TRUE U !(((i3.u15.p293<1)||(i0.u0.l0<1))))) + (!...668
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t6, t7, t43, t50, t78, t113, t122, t132, t135, t141, t145, t154, t156, t158, t164, t167, ...1129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,0,6.54106,196980,1,0,191091,140718,3030,481803,1659,983962,1042058
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 70 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 70 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 264 transition count 508
Iterating global reduction 0 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 264 transition count 508
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 264 transition count 496
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 210 transition count 423
Iterating global reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 210 transition count 423
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 27 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 210 transition count 396
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 323 place count 174 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 174 transition count 344
Ensure Unique test removed 21 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 21 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 174 transition count 323
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 396 place count 158 transition count 291
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 158 transition count 291
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 429 place count 158 transition count 274
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 437 place count 150 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 445 place count 150 transition count 266
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 150 transition count 258
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 460 place count 143 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 467 place count 143 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 470 place count 143 transition count 236
Applied a total of 470 rules in 43 ms. Remains 143 /334 variables (removed 191) and now considering 236/794 (removed 558) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 143 cols
[2023-03-08 04:08:36] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:08:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 348 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 428 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 12 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 96 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 143/334 places, 236/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 589 ms. Remains : 143/334 places, 236/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2689556261310766248.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17322430509465556732.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2689556261310766248.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17322430509465556732.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,337866,7.10666,218028,2,22435,5,549597,6,0,808,633958,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AG(((AF(((s1<1)||(l1637<1))) + (((s1<1)||(l3080<1))&&((s1<1)||(l4108<1)))) + AG(((s1<1)||(l4272<1))))) * (p194>=1)) * (l0>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (l0>=1)) * (p194>=1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(EG(!(((s1<1)||(l1637<1))))) + (((s1<1)||(l3080<1)...232
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t23, t71, t72, t76, t77, t78, t79, t80, t82, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t...834
(forward)formula 0,1,18.8671,469008,1,0,505,2.01767e+06,505,201,5855,992619,607
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 67 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 67 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 267 transition count 530
Iterating global reduction 0 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 267 transition count 530
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 267 transition count 514
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 215 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 1 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 215 transition count 443
Ensure Unique test removed 24 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 24 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 215 transition count 419
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 311 place count 182 transition count 376
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 182 transition count 376
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 182 transition count 359
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 376 place count 167 transition count 329
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 167 transition count 329
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 167 transition count 311
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 417 place count 159 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 425 place count 159 transition count 303
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 431 place count 159 transition count 297
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 441 place count 149 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 451 place count 149 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 149 transition count 257
Applied a total of 453 rules in 14 ms. Remains 149 /334 variables (removed 185) and now considering 257/794 (removed 537) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 257 rows 149 cols
[2023-03-08 04:08:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:08:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:08:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 111 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:08:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 355 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 441 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:08:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:08:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 108 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/334 places, 257/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 588 ms. Remains : 149/334 places, 257/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:08:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 257 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:08:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10125091405289906041.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:08:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6833239962173082349.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10125091405289906041.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6833239962173082349.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,422099,8.12372,236620,2,21069,5,629889,6,0,853,592103,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((((EG(AG(((s2>=1)&&(l4183>=1)))) + !(A(((s1>=1)&&(l4121>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l3078>=1))))) + ((s1<1)||(l4117<1))) + (EX(((p74>=1)&&(l0...253
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(((EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((s2>=1)&&(l4183>=1)))))) + !(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l3078>=1))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l4...379
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t28, t69, t70, t71, t75, t76, t77, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t...885
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 04:09:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 04:09:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12240797894099554287.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12240797894099554287.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12240797894099554287.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12240797894099554287.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12240797894099554287.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 04:09:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 04:09:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 04:09:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 252 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:09:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 240 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2023-03-08 04:09:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13205736409312990785.gal : 3 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability471544436127227860.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13205736409312990785.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability471544436127227860.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,422099,1.10735,43708,1457,1974,36763,23307,560,152551,313,175933,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((((EG(AG(((i2.u1.s2>=1)&&(i6.u17.l4183>=1)))) + !(A(((i2.u1.s1>=1)&&(i6.u17.l4121>=1)) U ((i2.u1.s1>=1)&&(i2.u9.l3078>=1))))) + ((i...355
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(((EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u1.s2>=1)&&(i6.u17.l4183>=1)))))) + !(!((E(!(((i2.u1.s1>=1)&&(i2.u9.l3078...505
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t13, t28, t77, t86, t97, t99, t103, t115, t119, t128, t178, t195, t196, t197, t200, t201,...690
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,1,6.91651,248308,1,0,171252,101201,2708,1.55886e+06,1724,1.09359e+06,574670
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 74 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 74 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 260 transition count 484
Iterating global reduction 0 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 260 transition count 484
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 260 transition count 470
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 204 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 1 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 204 transition count 394
Ensure Unique test removed 26 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 26 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 204 transition count 368
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 337 place count 167 transition count 315
Iterating global reduction 2 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 167 transition count 315
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 167 transition count 298
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 409 place count 149 transition count 263
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 427 place count 149 transition count 263
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 444 place count 149 transition count 246
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 453 place count 140 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 140 transition count 237
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 140 transition count 230
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 480 place count 129 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 5 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 491 place count 129 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 493 place count 129 transition count 182
Applied a total of 493 rules in 26 ms. Remains 129 /334 variables (removed 205) and now considering 182/794 (removed 612) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 182 rows 129 cols
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 244 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 311 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 95 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/334 places, 182/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 449 ms. Remains : 129/334 places, 182/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 182 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8809347152362739509.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5384069799127849309.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8809347152362739509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5384069799127849309.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,242844,2.83608,95744,2,12160,5,249620,6,0,698,329399,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(AF(((s1<1)||(l4117<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((s1<1)||(l4117<1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t68, t69, t73, t74, t75, t83, t85, t86, t87, t89, t90, t97, t98, t100, ...591
(forward)formula 0,1,8.66985,237068,1,0,346,731963,392,140,5105,603053,417
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 69 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 69 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 265 transition count 495
Iterating global reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 265 transition count 495
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 265 transition count 485
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 212 transition count 412
Iterating global reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 212 transition count 412
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 27 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 212 transition count 385
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 317 place count 176 transition count 336
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 176 transition count 336
Ensure Unique test removed 19 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 19 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 176 transition count 317
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 387 place count 161 transition count 290
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 161 transition count 290
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 161 transition count 279
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 420 place count 154 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 427 place count 154 transition count 272
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 434 place count 154 transition count 265
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 443 place count 145 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 145 transition count 228
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 145 transition count 225
Applied a total of 455 rules in 19 ms. Remains 145 /334 variables (removed 189) and now considering 225/794 (removed 569) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 145 cols
[2023-03-08 04:09:43] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:09:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:09:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 83 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 332 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 408 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:09:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:09:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 98 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 145/334 places, 225/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 526 ms. Remains : 145/334 places, 225/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:09:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 225 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:09:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16756126438316178957.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 04:09:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9036054634879738733.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16756126438316178957.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9036054634879738733.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,481086,10.6772,249816,2,26154,5,625366,6,0,805,785133,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((!(A(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l3083>=1))) U AF(((s1>=1)&&(l4140>=1))))) + AG((((s1>=1)&&(l1720>=1)) + AF(((s1<1)||(l4272<1)))))) + AG(A(((s1>=1)...195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([FwdG((FwdU(EY(Init),!(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l4140>=1))))))) * !(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l3083>=1))))),!(((s1>=1)&&(l4140>=...493
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t28, t70, t71, t75, t76, t77, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t85, t...873
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 04:10:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 04:10:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15736331491913522263.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15736331491913522263.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15736331491913522263.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15736331491913522263.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15736331491913522263.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 04:10:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 04:10:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 04:10:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 231 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:10:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 203 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2023-03-08 04:10:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6738480239607883845.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13978329432339535406.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6738480239607883845.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13978329432339535406.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,481086,2.28059,88248,1701,1813,60789,29297,567,634905,290,209729,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((!(A(EX(((u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u14.l3083>=1))) U AF(((u0.s1>=1)&&(i6.u5.l4140>=1))))) + AG((((u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u14.l1720>=1)) + AF(((u0.s1<1)...255
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([FwdG((FwdU(EY(Init),!(!(EG(!(((u0.s1>=1)&&(i6.u5.l4140>=1))))))) * !(EX(((u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u14.l3083>=1))))),!...595
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t13, t24, t69, t71, t77, t99, t117, t118, t137, t146, t148, t150, t166, t167, t168, t169,...703
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,1,10.7397,315788,1,0,287415,100668,2538,1.88092e+06,1633,1.06983e+06,766223
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 71 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 71 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 263 transition count 496
Iterating global reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 263 transition count 496
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 263 transition count 483
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 210 place count 208 transition count 409
Iterating global reduction 1 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 208 transition count 409
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 27 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 208 transition count 382
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 328 place count 172 transition count 329
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 172 transition count 329
Ensure Unique test removed 19 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 19 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 172 transition count 310
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 399 place count 156 transition count 282
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 156 transition count 282
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 156 transition count 271
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 435 place count 147 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 444 place count 147 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 451 place count 147 transition count 255
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 460 place count 138 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 138 transition count 224
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 473 place count 138 transition count 220
Applied a total of 473 rules in 51 ms. Remains 138 /334 variables (removed 196) and now considering 220/794 (removed 574) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 138 cols
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 88 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 356 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 433 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 164 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/334 places, 220/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 656 ms. Remains : 138/334 places, 220/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1491783715475919211.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16710247572954098395.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1491783715475919211.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16710247572954098395.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,309339,4.57017,140184,2,16893,5,351044,6,0,772,438772,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(E(A(((p242>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l3082>=1))) U (!(A(((s1>=1)&&(l4126>=1)) U ((p411>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) * EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l3086>=1))...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l3082>=1))) U (!(((p242>=1)&&(l0>=1))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l3082>=1))))) + EG(!(((s1...344
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t28, t70, t71, t75, t76, t77, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, t92, t...813
(forward)formula 0,0,19.7686,575280,1,0,628,2.97422e+06,490,264,5580,1.49132e+06,784
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 74 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 74 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 260 transition count 484
Iterating global reduction 0 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 260 transition count 484
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 260 transition count 470
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 217 place count 205 transition count 395
Iterating global reduction 1 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 205 transition count 395
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 25 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 205 transition count 370
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 334 place count 168 transition count 317
Iterating global reduction 2 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 168 transition count 317
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 168 transition count 300
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 406 place count 150 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 424 place count 150 transition count 265
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 441 place count 150 transition count 248
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 450 place count 141 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 141 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 466 place count 141 transition count 232
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 476 place count 131 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 131 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 489 place count 131 transition count 191
Applied a total of 489 rules in 39 ms. Remains 131 /334 variables (removed 203) and now considering 191/794 (removed 603) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 131 cols
[2023-03-08 04:10:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:10:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:10:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:10:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 292 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 399 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:10:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:10:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:10:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 112 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 131/334 places, 191/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 561 ms. Remains : 131/334 places, 191/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:10:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 191 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:10:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13849570753226293244.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16873091813543660535.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13849570753226293244.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16873091813543660535.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,240410,3.21856,105148,2,13302,5,271937,6,0,715,339028,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((EF(AG(((s1<1)||(l2464<1)))) + !(A(((s1>=1)&&(l1725>=1)) U !(((s1>=1)&&(l4105>=1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((s1<1)||(l2464<1)))))) + !(!((E(!(!(((s1>=1)&&(l4105>=1)))) U (!((...257
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t27, t69, t70, t74, t75, t76, t84, t85, t86, t87, t89, t90, t91, t92, t...633
(forward)formula 0,1,11.9436,314612,1,0,419,1.3671e+06,417,174,5155,730008,510
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 274 transition count 544
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 274 transition count 544
Ensure Unique test removed 20 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 20 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 274 transition count 524
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 230 transition count 462
Iterating global reduction 1 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 230 transition count 462
Ensure Unique test removed 22 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 22 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 230 transition count 440
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 276 place count 204 transition count 403
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 204 transition count 403
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 204 transition count 393
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 328 place count 188 transition count 362
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 188 transition count 362
Ensure Unique test removed 21 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 21 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 188 transition count 341
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 372 place count 181 transition count 334
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 379 place count 181 transition count 334
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 181 transition count 326
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 392 place count 176 transition count 312
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 176 transition count 312
Applied a total of 397 rules in 19 ms. Remains 176 /334 variables (removed 158) and now considering 312/794 (removed 482) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 312 rows 176 cols
[2023-03-08 04:10:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:10:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:10:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 146 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:10:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 540 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 659 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:10:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:10:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 116 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 176/334 places, 312/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 795 ms. Remains : 176/334 places, 312/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 312 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6089972555799293474.gal : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:10:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability412082974888504860.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6089972555799293474.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability412082974888504860.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,680690,14.9354,407928,2,32346,5,917353,6,0,1016,1.08212e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(EF(!(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l2670>=1))))) U (((!(((s1>=1)&&(l3844>=1))) * A(((p195>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((p236>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + A(((s1>=1)&&(l364...463
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(!((E(!((((!(((s1>=1)&&(l3844>=1))) * !((E(!(((p236>=1)&&(l0>=1))) U (!(((p195>=1)&&(l0>=1))) *...1557
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t33, t46, t76, t77, t78, t80, t81, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, t...1114
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 04:11:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:11:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 04:11:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph76408046612357152.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph76408046612357152.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph76408046612357152.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph76408046612357152.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph76408046612357152.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 04:11:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 04:11:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 04:11:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 312 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:11:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2023-03-08 04:11:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 294 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2023-03-08 04:11:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14053631675092390965.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:11:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4542145750345518267.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14053631675092390965.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4542145750345518267.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,680690,4.7134,110464,2093,2616,83921,68365,689,447804,409,577249,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(EF(!(EG(((i3.u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.i1.u2.l2670>=1))))) U (((!(((i3.u0.s1>=1)&&(i6.u18.l3844>=1))) * A(((i3.u0.p195>=1)&&(i2.i1.u2.l0>=1)) U...682
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(!((E(!((((!(((i3.u0.s1>=1)&&(i6.u18.l3844>=1))) * !((E(!(((i3.u0.p236>=1)&&(i2.i1.u2.l0>=1))) ...2236
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t12, t14, t80, t134, t138, t148, t149, t157, t164, t166, t167, t170, t173, t174, t178...1185
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,1,19.2828,393096,1,0,376975,148000,3410,1.91947e+06,2344,1.50681e+06,990217
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 66 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 66 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 268 transition count 521
Iterating global reduction 0 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 268 transition count 521
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 268 transition count 504
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 198 place count 219 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 219 transition count 438
Ensure Unique test removed 19 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 19 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 219 transition count 419
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 297 place count 188 transition count 374
Iterating global reduction 2 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 188 transition count 374
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 188 transition count 358
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 358 place count 174 transition count 330
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 174 transition count 330
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 174 transition count 313
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 396 place count 167 transition count 306
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 167 transition count 306
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 167 transition count 302
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 411 place count 163 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 163 transition count 297
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 163 transition count 296
Applied a total of 416 rules in 17 ms. Remains 163 /334 variables (removed 171) and now considering 296/794 (removed 498) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 296 rows 163 cols
[2023-03-08 04:11:48] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:11:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:11:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:11:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 142 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:11:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 449 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 529 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:11:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:11:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 112 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 163/334 places, 296/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 659 ms. Remains : 163/334 places, 296/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2023-03-08 04:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:11:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 296 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2023-03-08 04:11:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11307680930853863467.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:11:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14971577455307984025.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11307680930853863467.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14971577455307984025.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,554207,10.9464,314416,2,32750,5,748101,6,0,948,820858,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EG(AF(((((s1>=1)&&(l3847>=1))||(p295<1))||(l3102<1)))) + ((EF(((s1<1)||(l4116<1))) * AG(((s1<1)||(l4107<1)))) * (((EG(((s1>=1)&&(l426...323
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!(((((s1>=1)&&(l3847>=1))||(p295<1))||(l3102<1)))))))) * !(E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l4116<1)...1153
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t56, t57, t76, t77, t82, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t89, t90, t91, t92, t...1145
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 04:12:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 04:12:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3119976446086940813.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3119976446086940813.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3119976446086940813.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3119976446086940813.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3119976446086940813.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 04:12:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 04:12:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 04:12:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 231 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:12:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 232 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2023-03-08 04:12:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4779325483240994639.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15272734275038982761.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4779325483240994639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15272734275038982761.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,554207,0.714865,35196,1098,2930,24783,25706,472,88940,488,242033,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EG(AF(((((u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u12.l3847>=1))||(i3.u3.p295<1))||(i7.u9.l3102<1)))) + ((EF(((u0.s1<1)||(i7.u15.l4116<1))) * AG(((u0.s1<1)||(...440
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!(((((u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u12.l3847>=1))||(i3.u3.p295<1))||(i7.u9.l3102<1)))))))) * !(E(TRU...1459
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t55, t75, t128, t148, t152, t159, t163, t190, t196, t210, t219, t223, t229, t231, t232, t...1094
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,2.91155,110448,1,0,94269,147540,2336,213133,2901,684663,291662
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 74 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 74 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 260 transition count 487
Iterating global reduction 0 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 260 transition count 487
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 260 transition count 474
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 203 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 1 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 203 transition count 397
Ensure Unique test removed 29 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 29 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 203 transition count 368
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 342 place count 165 transition count 313
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 165 transition count 313
Ensure Unique test removed 19 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 19 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 165 transition count 294
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 417 place count 147 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 435 place count 147 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 447 place count 147 transition count 247
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 457 place count 137 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 467 place count 137 transition count 237
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 474 place count 137 transition count 230
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 486 place count 125 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 498 place count 125 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 502 place count 125 transition count 179
Applied a total of 502 rules in 21 ms. Remains 125 /334 variables (removed 209) and now considering 179/794 (removed 615) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 125 cols
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 60 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 242 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 314 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 70 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/334 places, 179/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 418 ms. Remains : 125/334 places, 179/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 179 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3390217779535201253.gal : 1 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13513784180960919628.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3390217779535201253.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13513784180960919628.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,188286,3.29332,84680,2,11448,5,226340,6,0,679,255598,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((s1<1)||(l3086<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((s1<1)||(l3086<1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 3/0/176
(forward)formula 0,1,9.40102,250172,1,0,20,867939,19,4,3585,556444,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 67 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 67 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 267 transition count 533
Iterating global reduction 0 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 267 transition count 533
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 267 transition count 515
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 215 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 1 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 215 transition count 447
Ensure Unique test removed 29 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 29 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 215 transition count 418
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 319 place count 181 transition count 369
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 181 transition count 369
Ensure Unique test removed 19 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 19 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 181 transition count 350
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 387 place count 166 transition count 319
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 166 transition count 319
Ensure Unique test removed 21 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 21 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 166 transition count 298
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 429 place count 160 transition count 292
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 435 place count 160 transition count 292
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 439 place count 160 transition count 288
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 445 place count 154 transition count 270
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 451 place count 154 transition count 270
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 154 transition count 268
Applied a total of 453 rules in 11 ms. Remains 154 /334 variables (removed 180) and now considering 268/794 (removed 526) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 268 rows 154 cols
[2023-03-08 04:12:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:12:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 124 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:12:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 443 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 513 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:12:33] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 116 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 154/334 places, 268/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 654 ms. Remains : 154/334 places, 268/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 268 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13041435835904521941.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13933727163489138419.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13041435835904521941.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13933727163489138419.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,407802,7.53431,219336,2,25899,5,537801,6,0,884,571720,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((EX(E((((s1>=1)&&(l3076>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l3079>=1))) U !(((s1>=1)&&(l3>=1))))) + AG(((((p314>=1)&&(l3101>=1)) + AG(((p356>=1)&&(l2273>...396
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,((EX(E((((s1>=1)&&(l3076>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l3079>=1))) U !(((s1>=1)&&(l3>=1))))) + !(E(TRUE U !(...556
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t54, t55, t56, t75, t76, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t...1005
(forward)formula 0,0,18.5672,473060,1,0,505,1.51686e+06,569,195,6296,737989,631
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 68 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 68 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 266 transition count 516
Iterating global reduction 0 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 266 transition count 516
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 266 transition count 499
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 218 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 218 transition count 436
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 25 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 218 transition count 411
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 306 place count 186 transition count 364
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 186 transition count 364
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 186 transition count 351
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 368 place count 169 transition count 317
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 385 place count 169 transition count 317
Ensure Unique test removed 21 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 21 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 406 place count 169 transition count 296
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 414 place count 161 transition count 288
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 161 transition count 288
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 161 transition count 280
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 436 place count 155 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 442 place count 155 transition count 265
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 444 place count 155 transition count 263
Applied a total of 444 rules in 18 ms. Remains 155 /334 variables (removed 179) and now considering 263/794 (removed 531) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 263 rows 155 cols
[2023-03-08 04:12:51] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:12:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:12:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 110 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:12:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 355 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 439 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:12:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:12:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 105 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 155/334 places, 263/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 562 ms. Remains : 155/334 places, 263/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 263 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4752921862772778072.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:12:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability136629750396070765.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4752921862772778072.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability136629750396070765.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,462249,15.6248,437996,2,29733,5,1.07814e+06,6,0,883,1.28195e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(E((((s1>=1)&&(l4313>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l2673>=1))) U ((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l4109>=1))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l4308>=1))&&((p350>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + (...380
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(E((((s1>=1)&&(l4313>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l2673>=1))) U ((!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l4109>=...800
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t28, t29, t30, t44, t74, t76, t77, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t...1041
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2023-03-08 04:13:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2023-03-08 04:13:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph329079521314278489.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph329079521314278489.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph329079521314278489.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph329079521314278489.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph329079521314278489.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2023-03-08 04:13:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2023-03-08 04:13:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2023-03-08 04:13:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 221 redundant transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:13:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 202 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2023-03-08 04:13:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15244882745736995205.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5186165038089129056.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15244882745736995205.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5186165038089129056.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,462249,2.70655,110068,1648,3275,52445,42405,500,755229,406,549591,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(E((((u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.u4.l4313>=1))||((u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.u12.l2673>=1))) U ((AX(((u0.s1>=1)&&(i5.u19.l4109>=1))) + (((u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.u4....497
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(E((((u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.u4.l4313>=1))||((u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.u12.l2673>=1))) U ((!(EX(!...1015
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t5, t13, t75, t131, t132, t133, t147, t149, t150, t154, t163, t165, t169, t183, t197, t20...1069
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,0,9.21567,306592,1,0,140539,157319,2437,2.25824e+06,2355,1.42308e+06,408788
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 71 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 71 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 263 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 263 transition count 502
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 263 transition count 491
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 208 transition count 416
Iterating global reduction 1 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 208 transition count 416
Ensure Unique test removed 28 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 28 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 208 transition count 388
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 327 place count 172 transition count 335
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 363 place count 172 transition count 335
Ensure Unique test removed 21 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 21 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 172 transition count 314
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 400 place count 156 transition count 286
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 156 transition count 286
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 427 place count 156 transition count 275
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 435 place count 148 transition count 267
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 443 place count 148 transition count 267
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 451 place count 148 transition count 259
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 460 place count 139 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 139 transition count 221
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 471 place count 139 transition count 219
Applied a total of 471 rules in 23 ms. Remains 139 /334 variables (removed 195) and now considering 219/794 (removed 575) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 139 cols
[2023-03-08 04:13:31] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:13:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:13:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:13:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 324 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 413 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:13:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:13:32] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 86 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 139/334 places, 219/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 541 ms. Remains : 139/334 places, 219/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:13:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 219 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:13:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4957442048547972698.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17348919330571363668.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4957442048547972698.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17348919330571363668.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,411806,6.51299,196624,2,20564,5,487934,6,0,775,686342,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(!(((s1>=1)&&(l4281>=1))) U !((AF(((s1>=1)&&(l1678>=1))) + ((E(((s1>=1)&&(l1>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l4129>=1))) * (s1>=1)) * (l3080>=1))))...157
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!((!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1678>=1))))) + ((E(((s1>=1)&&(l1>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l4129>=1))) * (s1>...462
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t27, t69, t70, t74, t75, t76, t84, t85, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, t92, t...818
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,21.4746,587712,1,0,545,2.82388e+06,475,231,5537,1.53243e+06,637
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 794/794 transitions.
Discarding 73 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 73 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 261 transition count 485
Iterating global reduction 0 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 261 transition count 485
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 261 transition count 471
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 215 place count 206 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 1 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 206 transition count 397
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 25 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 206 transition count 372
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 331 place count 170 transition count 321
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 170 transition count 321
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 170 transition count 305
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 401 place count 152 transition count 270
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 152 transition count 270
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 436 place count 152 transition count 253
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 443 place count 145 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 450 place count 145 transition count 246
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 145 transition count 239
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 466 place count 136 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 475 place count 136 transition count 195
Applied a total of 475 rules in 24 ms. Remains 136 /334 variables (removed 198) and now considering 195/794 (removed 599) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 195 rows 136 cols
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 61 read => feed constraints.
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 284 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 367 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 88 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 136/334 places, 195/794 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 481 ms. Remains : 136/334 places, 195/794 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1013960503156408726.gal : 2 ms
[2023-03-08 04:13:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability776624382731536535.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1013960503156408726.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability776624382731536535.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202303021504/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,332510,4.95435,155172,2,16085,5,382627,6,0,739,581879,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(EG((((s1<1)||(l4112<1))&&((s1<1)||(l3675<1))))) * EF(EX(((p342>=1)&&(l2273>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(EG((((s1<1)||(l4112<1))&&((s1<1)||(l3675<1)))))),TRUE)) * ((p342>=1)&&(l2273>=1)...167
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t13, t14, t68, t69, t73, t74, t75, t83, t85, t86, t87, t89, t90, t95, t96, t98, t...650
(forward)formula 0,1,17.8334,453476,1,0,452,2.04092e+06,414,182,5377,1.18136e+06,526
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2023-03-08 04:14:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2023-03-08 04:14:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Total runtime 461143 ms.

BK_STOP 1678248853490

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202303021504.jar
+ VERSION=202303021504
+ echo 'Running Version 202303021504'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5348"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r101-tall-167814475200298"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d2m05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;